Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and ascorbic acid in a 100:1 (w兾w) ratio was prepared and Table 1. Typical Results for Precision and Accuracy
analyzed. The results of six trials are shown in Table 1. of the Experimental Method
Data Citric Acid Ascorbic Acid
Experimental Procedure Number of Trials 6 6
Students work in pairs and each pair is given a package Mass added/g 20.3018 0.2114
of commercial powdered drink mix to be weighed and quan- a
Precision 20.80 ± 0.11 0.2067 ± 0.0006
titatively dissolved with water in a 250-mL volumetric flask.
One student analyzes the solution for total acid by titration Accuracy (% Error) 2.5 ᎑2.3
with a standardized ∼0.1 M NaOH prepared by the instruc- a
Mass values for the acids are reported as the experimental mean with
tor; students must note the actual concentration. The sec- a 95% confidence interval.
ond student analyzes the solution for ascorbic acid content
by titration with 0.00100 M KIO3, also prepared by the in-
structor. This procedure requires two hours of laboratory
time. Complete student procedures and data sheets for this powdered drink mixes are consistent with the package label-
experiment, as well as procedure variations are available in ing. Mass values for the acids are reported as the experimen-
the Supplemental Material.W tal mean with a 95% confidence interval.
Actual sample information for Kool-Aid brand powdered
Equipment drink mixes is proprietary and percent error for the experi-
mental masses cannot be reported. The experimental values
In addition to standard laboratory glassware, this pro- of “percent by mass” for citric acid range from 76.6% to
cedure requires two burets and an analytical balance. The pro- 97.0% and citric acid is listed as the primary ingredient on
cedure also requires the use of a 250-mL volumetric flask and all packages tested. Experimental values for ascorbic acid
volumetric pipets (10-mL and 50-mL). Graduated glassware range from 0.751% to 1.23% and ascorbic acid is listed as a
may be substituted for these. Required chemicals are potas- much less significant ingredient on each package tested. The
sium iodate (KIO3), potassium iodide (KI), hydrochloric acid percent RDA listed on the packages is 10% (of 70 mg) per
(HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), soluble starch, and thy- serving, which agrees with the results listed in Table 2.
mol blue indicator. A detailed equipment and reagent list is Thirteen students in the quantitative analysis course at
available in the Supplemental Material.W our university performed this experiment and their average
results for two flavors of Kool-aid are shown in Table 3. The
Hazards students’ results are similar to our findings in Table 2. Some
variation between the authors’ results and the students’ re-
HCl is corrosive and NaOH is caustic. Handle both with sults could be due to lot variation. While the results reported
care. KIO3 is an oxidizing agent. Solid KI is a possible skin are for Kool-Aid, other brands of powdered drink mixes were
and lung irritant. Solutions of KIO3, thymol blue and soluble tested and worked equally well.
starch pose minimal risk to students. Always wear eye pro-
tection in the lab. Summar y
Table 3. Students’ Results tory; Pauling, L. Ed.; W. H. Freeman: San Fransisco, CA, 1966;
Kool-Aid Citric Acid/ Ascorbic Acid/ RDA
pp 167–168.
Flavor (% by Mass) (% by Mass) (%) 3. Stone, M. B.; Soliah, L.; Craig, J. Qual. Plant. Plant Foods
Hum. Nutr. 1982, 31, 327–332.
Orange 76.3 1.25 10.
4. Digital Library: Chemistry Laboratory Series, Acids, Bases and
Lemon–Lime 97.8 1.34 10. Buffers.Titration Analysis of Weak Acid Solutions: Potassium Acid
Phthalate, Acetic Acid in Vinegar, and Citric Acid in Fruits and
Acid/Base Titration of Ascorbic Acid, http://
archive.thomson.com/pam/TC_new_user.htm
Acknowledgments 5. Roberts, J. L., Jr.; Hollenberg, J. L.; Postma, J. M. General
Chemistry in the Laboratory; W. H. Freeman: New York, 1987;
The initial work for this article began as a project for pp 427–432.
the North Carolina program, Summer Ventures in Science 6. Thompson, S. Chemtrek—Small Scale Experiments for General
and Mathematics. We would also like to thank the A. R. Chemistry; Allyn and Bacon: Needham Heights, MA, 1990;
Smith Department of Chemistry at Appalachian State Uni- Chapter 11.
versity. 7. Supplement Watch. http://www.supplementwatch.com/supatoz/
supplement.asp?supplementId=61 (accessed May 2004).
W
Supplemental Material 8. Sirota, G. R.; MacInnis, W. K.; Rasmussen, P. W. J. Chem.
Educ. 1979, 56, 421.
A student laboratory handout, including procedures,
9. Chemical Education Resources; http://www.cerlabs.com/ (ac-
sample calculations, and data sheets, and notes for the in-
cessed May 2004); Reed, R. G.: Kotz, J. C. ANAL 442—Ana-
structor, including solution preparation and laboratory setup,
lyzing Food Products for Vitamin C.
are available in this issue of JCE Online.
10. Chemical Education Resources; http://www.cerlabs.com/ (ac-
cessed May 2004); Silverstein, T. P.; Johnson, E. R. ANAL
Literature Cited
501—Determining the Effects of Cooking on the Vitamin C
1. Canella, A. W. Modular Laboratory Program in Chemistry; Content of Green Pepper.
Spencer, J. N., Neidig, H. A., Eds.; Willard Grant Press: Bos- 11. Bailey, D. N. J. Chem. Educ. 1974, 51, 488.
ton, MA, 1983. 12. Silva, C. R.; Simoni, J. A.; Collins, C. H.; Volpe, P. L. O. J.
2. Frantz, H. W.; Malm, L. E. Chemical Principles in the Labora- Chem. Educ. 1999, 76, 1421–1422.