You are on page 1of 12

TD-LTE Project

www.huawei.com
www.huawei.com

TD-LTE Load Analysis VS SINR


Quality
Author/ Email: Ray Khastur
Version: V2.0 (20150926)
0% Load on Planning Tools

By using Planning Tools U-Net, we can change the Actual Load Based on daily KPI
monitoring of RB (DL & UL) usage in order to know SINR level on 4G Live
Network .
2
How to Change 80% Load on Planning Tools

In this slide, We have to change the actual load from 0% to 80% in whole mini
cluster that we want to analysis in order to know what is the impact of Load with
SINR level.
3
Simulation Result
RSRP
RSRP with 0% Load

5
RSRP with 80% Load

6
RSRP Comparison

In this simulation one site have configuration of 10 MHz and all cell’s using the same Physical and RF Parameter as field implementation

From Simulation of mini cluster there is no difference between 0% Load compare with
80% Load.

7
Simulation Result
SINR
SINR with 0% Load

9
SINR with 80% Load

10
SINR Comparison

From Simulation of mini cluster there is degradation of SINR > 0 dB at 5.75% due to
Load incremental from 0% to 80%.

It’s mean in every time we want to do optimization, we have to consider load of RB


utilization from OSS Daily Monitoring.
We have to mapping each cell and implement to our planning tools as our reference or
justification if any degradation of SINR KPI during Drive Test as the time goes by.

11
OSS KPI Analysis
On the week days, DL PRB Utilization
higher than weekend days

User Number almost have correlation


with the increment of DL PRB Usage

MCS QPSK Decrease Significant on


the weekend days according with Low
PRB Usage

MCS 16 QAM Relative Increase on


the weekend days according with Low
PRB Usage

MCS 64 QAM Increase Significant on


the weekend days according with Low
PRB Usage

12