ll

© All Rights Reserved

2 views

ll

© All Rights Reserved

- Experiment 5 - Tensile Test
- Fundamentals of Engineering Plasticity
- ANSYS Workbench Static
- Plasticity-Failure Theories Lecture Notes
- Failure Theories.pdf
- Mmf Experiment No 1
- Plasticity
- jntuk_m_tech_r16_md_syllabus.pdf
- shaft part 1
- 7___8_Syllabus
- Mechanical Properties
- Stress Strain Curve
- 2009-08-25 Kinder Morgan Ltr to PHMSA Re MEP Special Permit & Joint Replacement Search Able
- 08 Plasticity 06 Strain Hardening
- STATIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AN ADVANCED POWER TILLER CHASSIS AND CHISEL PLOUGH
- Sti0808 Hill
- Machinedesign.com Article a Simpler Way to Predict Bolt
- Damage Assessment of Offshore Riser-guards Under A
- Chapter 1 Stress Strain
- 3.1.20 - Ms13-001 Design Equations for Plates Subjected to Heat Loads and Lateral Pressure

You are on page 1of 42

StressStrain Relations

Fig. 1

L0 = Original gauge length.

Ai = instantaneous cross section of the specimen.

Li = instantaneous length of specimen after extension

2

N = Necking Point F = Fracture Point

Fig. 3

3

Fig. 4

4

i. Engineering

Fi

Stress S A Fi = instantaneous load

0

L Change in length L L0

Engineering strain =

L0 Original length of specimen L0

Fi

ii. True stress and

Ai

Li

dL L

True strain L log L

i

L0 o

True stress is defined as load divided by actual cross sectional area (not original cross sectional area

A0) for that particular load.

Fi

Ai

Similarly, true strain is based on the instantaneous specimen length rather than original length. As such

true strain (or incremental strain) is defined as

dL

d

L

Where L is length at load F and is the true strain.

The true strain at load F is then obtained by summing all the increments of equation.

Arithmetically, this can be written as

dL0 dL1 dL2 dL3 dLn

d L0

L1

L2

L3

......

Ln

L1

dL L1

L

log

L0

L0

True strain is the sum of each incremental elongation divided by the current length of specimen, where

L0 is original gauge length and Li is the gauge length corresponding to load F i. The most important

characteristics of truestress strain diagram is that true stress increases all the way to fracture. Thus true

fracture strength f is greater than the true ultimate strength u in contrast with engineering stress

where fracture strength is lesser than ultimate strength.

5

From volume constancy, V = A0 L0 = Ai Li

Li A

0

L0 Ai

Li L0 Li

e= 1

L0 L

0

Li

( 1 e)

L0

Fi Fi A0 Li

S

Ai A0 Ai L0

S (1 e)

Li

dL L

log i log (1 e)

L0

L L0

log (1 e)

1. Engineering stressstrain diagram does not give true and accurate picture of deformation

characteristics of the material because it takes original cross sectional area for all calculations

though it reduces continuously after yield point in extension and markedly after necking. That’s

why we get fracture strength of a material less than its ultimate tensile strength is S u > Sf which is

not true.

2. Total engineering strain is not equal to sum of incremental strains which defies the logic.

6

Let us have a specimen with length of 50 mm which then is extended to 66.55 in three steps

E= L

0

0 50 50

1 50 55 5 5/50 = 0.1

2 55 60.5 5.5 5.5/55 = 0.1

3 60.5 66.55 6.05 6.05/60.5 = 0.1

5 5.5 6.05

Sum of incremental strain = 0.1 0.1 0.1 =0.3

50 55 60.5

Now we will calculate total strain considering original and final length after of extension L3 = 66.55

L3 L0 66.55 50

Total engineering strain when extended = 0.331

L0 50

The result is that summation of incremental engineering strain is NOT equal to total engineering strain.

Now same procedure is applied to true strain-

L1 L2 L3

01 12 2 3 = log log log

L0 L1 L 2

55 60.5 66.55

= log log log = 0.286

50 55 60.5

L3 66.55

But total true strain equals to 0.3 log log 0.286

L0 50

In the case of true strains, sum of incremental strain is equal to the overall strain. Thus true strains are

additive. This is not true for engineering strains.

3.

7

Fig

L1 = L0 = length after extension

L1 L 0 L1 L 0

Strain e = I

L0 L0

L1 = 0

Fig

To obtain strain of 1 the cylinder must be squeezed to zero thickness which is only hypothetical and not

true. Moreover, intuitively we expect that strain produced in compression should be equal in magnitude

but opposite in sign.

L1 2L 0

log log log 2

L0 L0

To compression; L1 = L0/2

L1 L0 / 2

log log log 1 / 2 log 2

L0 L0

gives consistent results. Thus true strains for equivalent deformation in tension and comprehension are

identical except for the sign. Further unlike engineering strains, true strains are consistent with actual

phenomenon.

Problem:

8

The following data were obtained during the true strain test of nickel specimen.

kN mm kN mm

0 6.40 15.88 5.11

15.30 6.35 15.57 5.08

15.92 6.22 14.90 4.83

16.32 6.10 14.01 4.57

16.5 5.97 13.12 4.32

16.55 5.84 12.45 3.78

B. Determine the following

1. True stress at maximum load.2.True fracture stress.3.True fracture strain.4.True uniform strain .5.

True necking strain. 6.Ultimate tensile strength.7. Strain hardening component.

Pmax 16.55 10 3

1. True stress at max load = = = 617.77 MPa

A 5.84 2

4

P 12.45 10 3

2. True fracture stress = A = = 1109 MPa

min 11 .22

2 2

d 6 .4

3. True fracture strain = ln 0 = ln = 1.053

d 3.78

i

2 2

d 6.4

4. True uniform strain = ln 0 = ln =0.183

d 5.84

i

true uniform strain = 1.053 0.183 = 0.87

Pmax 16.55 10 3

6. Ultimate tensile stress = = = 514 MPa

A max 6.4 2

4

9

Load Diamete Area True stress True strain = Engg. Stress Engg. Strain

KN r mm2 d

2

Pi ln 0 P 2

= d = d0

mm Ai i A = 1

di

(N/mm2)

(N/mm2)

0 6.40 32.17 0 0

15.3 6.35 31.67 48.31 0.0156 475.59 0.0158

15.92 6.22 30.39 523.86 0.057 494.87 0.059

16.32 6.10 29.22 558.52 0.096 507.30 0.10

16.5 5.97 27.99 589.50 0.139 512.90 0.149

16.55 5.84 26,79 617.77 0.183 514.45 0.20

15.88 5.11 20.5 774.63 0.45 493.62 0.568

15.57 5.08 20.27 768.13 0.46 484.00 0.587

14.90 4.83 18.32 813.32 0.56 463.16 0.755

14.01 4.57 16.40 854.27 0.67 435.5 0.961

13.12 4.32 14.66 894.95 0.786 407.83 1.19

12.45 3.78 11.22 1109.63 1.053 387.00 1.866

Engineering stress and strain are useful for many engineering design applications. Computation of

stress and strain is based on initial area or gauge length and therefore engineering stress and strain

represent only approximations of the real stress and strain in plastic zone.

In elastic deformation region (where dimensional changes are small and negligible) the initial and

instantaneous areas are approximately same and hence true stress equals engineering stress. Therefore,

in design problems where large dimensional changes do not occur, the use of engineering stress is

sufficiently accurate and used extensively as it is easier to measure.

However, for metal working where large plastic deformations occur and are necessary, the

approximations inherent in engineering stress and strain values are unacceptable. For this reason, the

true stress and true strains are used.

1. It represents the actual and accurate stress and strain. True strain refers to a length from which that

change is produced rather than to original gauge length.The engineering stresse and strains

provides incorrect values after yield point i.e. plastic zone which a main zone of interest for metal

working.

2. True strains additive i.e. the total overall strain is equal to sum of incremental strains.

10

3. True strains for equivalent deformation in tension and compression are identical except in sign.

4. The volume change is related to the sum of the three normal true strains and with volume constancy.

5. True stress can be related to true strain.

K () n (0 ) n

0 = the amount of strain hardening that material received prior to the tension test.

6. Truestresstrue strain values are quite sensitive to change in both metallurgical and mechanical

conditions of matter.

Truestressstrain Engineering

1. Actual values of gauge length and 1. Original cross sectional areas (A0) is

cross sectional area is used in used for calculating engineering stress.

calculating true stress and true strain. Fi

S=

Li A0

Fi dL

Ai

L Li L0

L0

Further strain e = is used.

L0

The sum of incremental strains is

The sum of incremental strains is not

equal to total strain

equal to total strain.

Unlike load elongation curve, there is

no maximum in the true strin curve.

The sloppe of the curve in the plastic

region decreases with increase in

strain

2. The calculated values of stress 2. The nominal stress (s) defined for the

strain are real and very useful in the tensile test in terms of original cross

plastic region of the curve. sectional area (A0) is not really stress

because the cross sectional area Ai at

the instant of load measurement is less

than A0 in the evaluation of s.

3. The metal working designers are 3. The structural designers are interested

interested in plastic region where in a region where strains are elastic

difference between Ai and A0 is and difference between Ai and A0 is

significant. The true stressstrains negligibly small. But this is not true in

give accurate picture and hence it is the plastic region and especially when

11

4. It is not easy to obtain values of 4. It is easy to obtain these values

from test since the force Fi and cross through test and convenientless

sectional area (Ai) must be measured costly. These values are widely

simultaneously. True stress ( ) is available and documented.

important in metal working

calculation because of its

fundamental significance.

5. It is more consistent with the 5. It is less consistent with physical

phenomenon of metal deformation. phenomenon of metal deformation.

Idealisation of stress – strain curves

The solutions to the plasticity problems are quite complex. To obtain solution to these problems,

stress – strain curves are idealized by [i] neglecting elastic strains and/or [ii] ignoring the effect work

hardening. Idealization and simplification restrict its field of application.

It considers elastic strains and neglects effects of work hardening; it yields more difficult constitutive

relations. As a consequence, it also leads to greater mathematical difficulties in practical applications. It

must be used for those processes in which elastic and plastic strains are of the same order. This is the

case in structural engineering or for bending.

In most metal forming operations, the permanent strains are much longer than the elastic. One therefore

in air no great error by assuming the metal to behave as a rigid body prior to yielding. It is for this

reason that one mainly employs perfectly plastic material idealisation.

12

Fig. 5

The flow curve

A true stress–strain curve is frequently called a flow curve because it gives the stress required to cause

the metal to flow physically to given strain.

The plastic region of a true stress – strain curve for many materials has a general form in the form of

Holloman equation which is

k () n

13

k is strength constant

Fig. 6

In a tension test of stell, a specimen of circular cross section with original diameter 9 mm is used. The

loads applied were 22 kN and 28 kN which reduces its diameter to 8.6 mm and 8.3 mm respectively.

Determine (i) true stress and true strain for given loads (ii) strain hardening exponent and strength

coefficient.

Solution:

d 0 original diameter of specimen = 9 mm

F1 22 10 3 ( N)

1 3.78 N / mm 2

/ 4 d12 / 4 (8.6) 2

F2 28 10 3

T2 517.5 N / mm 2

/ 4 (8.3) 2 / 4d2

2

L1

true strain log e

L0

L 0 length before deformation

A 0 L 0 A1 L1

14

2

2 L1 d

d 0 L 0 d12 L1 0

4 4 L 0 d1

2

d d

log 0 2 log 0

d1 d1

9

2 log 0.091

8 .6

d 9

2 log 0 2 log 0.1619

d1 8 .3

1 K1n

2 K n2

2

n

2 or log 2 n . log 2

1 1 1 1

2 517.5

log log

1 378 0.54

n

2 0.1619

log log

1 0.091

378 k (0.091) 0.54

K 1385 N / mm 2

15

Both n and K are material properties: The strain hardening exponent physically reflects the rate at which

the material hardens. The derivative of this equation

d d

n .

In states that fractional change in true stress caused by a fractional change in true strain is determined by

the strain hardening exponent (n). Therefore, the stress increases rapidly with strain for a material that

has a large strain hardening exponent, such as 3O 2 stainless steel (n = 0.3) compared to a material

where n is low such as 4.10 stainless steel (n = 0.1).

Plastic Instability

Necking or localised deformation begins at maximum load where decrease in cross sectional area

which hears the load is compensated by increase in strength due in load

dF = 0

Fig. 7

F .A

dF dA A d 0

16

dA d

A

L =

length of specimen

dV = 0 = A. dL + dA L

dA dL

A

L

d dl

d

L

d

d

Problem

Prove that uniform strain is equal strain hardening exponent (n).

Solution:

Fig.

17

P A A . k () n k () n (1)

Ao A0

log e

A A

A A 0 e (2)

P A 0 e K () n

P K A 0 [e () n ]

stress – strain curve dP = 0

u

n u n 1 u n

u n

Problem 1:

Hollomon equation for a material is given as 1400 () 0.33 . Find the ultimate tensile strength of the

material.

Solution:

Ultimate tensile strength of a material is measured at maximum load point and where necking begins.

Upto the necking point, deformation is uniform throughout its gauge length. It is a engineering stress

(S u ).

18

True strain for uniform elongation is equal to strain hardening exponent. Therefore u n.

u

Ultimate tensile strength = S u [ (1 e) S]

1 u

u log e (1 e u )

u (1 e u )

1 eu en

n n

u K . u n n

Su K u K n

e e

en en

0.33

0.33

1400 698.1 N / mm 2

2.71

UTS = 698. 1 N / mm 2

This shows that ultimate strength of a material can be calculated from the value of K and n.

Problem 2:

A metal obeys Hollomon relationship and has a UTS of 300 MPa. To reach the maximum load requires

an elongation of 35%. Find strain hardening exponent (n) and strength coefficient (K).

Solution:

UTS = S u = 300 MPa = 300 N / mm 2

Engineering elongation strain = e u = 35% = 0.35

uniform true strain u log (1 e u ) log (1.35) = 0.3

u S u (1 e u ) but n u 0.3

= 300 (1 + 0.35) = 405 N / mm 2 .

u K (u ) n k ( n ) n

19

K 581.2 N / mm 2

581.2 () 0.3

Deformation work

Work is defined as the product of force and distance. A quantity equivalent to work per unit volume is

the product of stress and strain. The area under the true stress strain curve for any strain 1 is the energy

per unit volume (u) or specific energy, of the deformed material.

Fig. 9

1

u d

0

The true stress–strain curve can be represented by the Hollomon equation K () n .

20

K 1n 1

u

n 1

1 1

n1

n K

u K () .d

0

n 1

0

similarly mean flow stress can be found

1 1

d K n .d

n1 n

K K

m 0 0 1 1

1 0 1 (n 1) 1 (n 1)

K 1n

m

n 1

The work calculated according to above equation assumes that the deformation is homogeneous through

out the deforming part. This work is called ideal deformation work.

21

Deformation of fully annealed AA–1100 aluminium is governed by the Hollomon equation. If a 10 cm

long bar of this material is pulled in tension from a diameter of 12.7 mm to a diameter of 11.5, calculate

the following:

a. the ideal work per unit volume of aluminium required;

b. the mean stress in the aluminium during deformation;

c. the peak stress applied to the aluminium.

Solutions

a. Calculate total strain during deformation

A0 d

ln 2 ln 0

A d

12.7

2 ln 0.199

11 .5

d2 (0.0127 m 2

V l 0.1 m 1.26 10 5 m 3

4 4

For AA–1100, K = 140 MPa and n = 0.25. Note that, as n , the deformation is homogeneous

n 1

Wi K 1 V

n 1

N 0.1991.25

140 10 6 1.26 10 5 m 3 187.5 N (J )

m6 1.25

1n

m K

n 1

0.199 0.25

140 MPa 74.8 MPa

1.25

1 K 1n 140 MPa 0.199 0.25 93.5 MPa

22

Yield Criterion

Yield point under simplified condition of uniaxial tension is widely known and documented. But such

simplified conditions [1 – Pure uniaxial tension 2 – Pure shear] are rare in reality. In many situations

complex and multiaxial stresses are present and in this situation it is necessary to know when a material

will yield. Mathematically and empirically, the relationships between the yield point under uniaxial

tensile test and yield strength under complex situations have been found out. These relationships are

known as yield criteria. Thus yield criterion is defined as mathematical and empirically derived

relationship between yield strength under uniaxial tensile load and yielding under multiaxial complex

stress situation.

Yield Criterion is a law defining the limit of elastic behaviour under any possible combination of

stresses is called yield criterion. Yield criterion is a mathematical expression which unites experimental

observations with mathematical expressions n a phenomenological manner. Yield criteria is primarily

used to predict if or when yielding

will occur under combined stress states in terms of particular properties of the metal being stressed [

0 , K] .

Any yield criterion is a postulated mathematical expression of the stress that will induce yielding or the

onset of plastic deformation. The most general form is

f( f (1 , 2 , 3 ) = C

For most ductile metals that are isotropic, the following assumptions are invoked:

1. There is no Bauschinger effect, thus the yield strengths in tension and compression are equivalent.

Bauschinger effect

23

The lowering of yield stress for a material when deformation in one direction is followed by deformation

in the opposite direction, is called Bauschinger effect.

Fig. 10

2. The constancy of volume prevails so that plastic equivalent of poison’s ratio 0.5.

3. The magnitude of the mean normal stress m 1 2 3 does not cause yielding. The

3

assumption that yielding is independent of σm (also called hydrostatic component of the total state

of stress) is reasonable if plastic flow depends upon shear mechanism such as slip or twinning. In

this context, yield criterion is written as

F[(σ1 σ2), (σ2 σ3), (σ3 σ1)] = C

which implies that yielding depends upon the size of the Mohr’s circle and not their position. It is

shown that if a stress state (σ1, σ2, σ3) will cause yielding, an equivalent stress state (1 , 2 , 3 )

Two widely used yield criterion:

1. Tresca criterion or maximum shear stress criterion.

2. Von Mises criterion or distortion energy criterion.

1. Tresca criterion

Tresca found that plastic flow in a metal begins when tangential stress attains a value.

24

Assume that a body is subjected to triaxial stresses. 1 , 2 , 3 are principal stresses and 1 2 3

(algebraically).

3

Tmax 1

2

when Tmax exceeds a certain value ‘c’, specific to that material, yielding will occur. To find the value

of ‘c’, the material is subjected to uniaxial tensile test and find out yield point strength ( 0 ).

1 0 , 2 3 0

3 0

Tmax 1 c

2 2

3 0

1 or 1 3 0

2 2

1 k 2 0 3 k k = shear strength of the material

1 3 0

k k 0

0

k 0.5 0

2

Application:

i) Plain stress condition. x , y, Txy

2

x y x y

1 (T ) 2

2 2 xy

25

2

x y x y

2 (T ) 2

2 2 xy

1 0 when 3 0

1 3 0 when 3 0

3

1 3 0 2 1

2

Shortcomings

1. An essential short coming of this criterion is that it ignore the effect of intermediate principal stress

( 2 ).

2. Since pastic flow depends upon slip phenomenon which is essentially a shearing. Slip is

practically absent in brittle materials. Therefore application of this criterion is limited to ductile

materials. This criterion is not applicable to crystalline brittle material which cannot be brought

into plastic state under tension but yield a little before compress fracture in compression.

3. Failure of/ yielding of a material under triaxial pure tension condition where 1 2 3 can not

be explained by this criterion.

4. It suffers from a major difficulty that it is necessary to know in advance which are maximum and

minimum stresses.

5. Moreover, the general form of this criterion is far more complicated than the Von Mises criterion.

Therefore Von Mises criterion is preferred in most theoretical (not practical) work.

26

According to this criterion, yielding will occur when shear strain energy per unit volume reaches a

critical value. The shear strain energy per unit volume is expressed terms of three principal stresses:

e

1

( 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2

G 1

G = modulus of shear which is a constant.

(1 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2 = Constant.

(1 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2 2 0 2

( x y ) 2 ( y z ) 2 ( z x ) 2 (T 2 T 2 T 2 ) 2 0 2

x y y z z x

1 3

ii) For plane strain: 2

2

1 k 2 0 3 k

(1 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2 3 1 ) 2 2 0 2

(k 0 0) 2 (0 k 0 ) 2 (k 0 k 0 ) 2 2 0 2

k02 2 y2

y

k = 0.557 0

3

This is the relationship between shear yield strength and tensile yield strength of the material as per Von

Mises criterion.

27

k 0 0.577 0 Von Mises criterion.

y

Von Mises criterion satisfy the experimental data better than Tresca and therefore k value is

3

normally used.

1. It overcomes major deficiency of Tresca criterion. Von Mises criterion implies that yielding is not

dependent on any particular normal stress but instead, depends on all three principal shearing

stresses.

2. Von Mises criterion conforms the experimental data better than Tresca and therefore more realistic.

3. Since it involves squared terms, the result is independent of sign of individual stresses. This is an

important since it is not necessary to know which is the largest and the smallest principal stress in

order to use this criterion.

( x

y ) 2 ( y z ) 2 ( z x ) 2 6 (T 2 xy T 2 yz T 2 zx ) 2 0 2

Effective stress

With the yield criterion, it is useful to define an effective stress denoted as which is function of the

applies stresses. If the magnitude of reaches a critical value, then the applied stress will cause

yielding.

For Von Mises criterion

1

2

( 1 2 )

2

( 2 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2 1/ 2

1 3

28

2k …………………… Tresca

1. In plane stress condition, there is no stress 1. In plane strain condition, the strain

in third direction is absent.

in third direction.

1

2 2 υ( 3 1 )

E

2 υ ( 1 3 )

1

υ (For plastic defo)

2

2 1 3

2

But there is strain in third direction. Two

principal stresses

2

x y x y

1

2

2

Txy 2

2

x y x y )

2

2

2

Txy 2

1

1 1 υ ( 2 )

E

1

2 2 υ (1 )

E

1

3 0 υ (1 2 )

E

In majority of metal forming operations the problem can be simplified by assuming a condition of plane

strain is one. One of the principal strains is zero.

1

1 1 υ ( 2 3 )

E

1

2 2 υ (1 3 )

E

29

1

3 3 υ (1 2 )

E

let 2 0 2 υ (1 3 ) for plastic region, Nadai has shown that 0.5

3

2 1

2

3

Thus, for Tresca criterion: 1 , 1 , 3

2

1 3 0

2 2

3 3

1 1 1 3 ( 3 1 ) 2 2 0 2

2 2

3

1 . 3 2 2 0 2

2

2

1 3 ) 2 0 '0

3

30

Yield criterion

Criterion (Tresca) energy criterion (Von Misces)

Stress Strain Shear

2

2 0, min 2 1 1 3 k 2 0

2

1 0 ..... 3 ve 1 3 0 1 3 0

1 3 0 3 ve 2 k = 0

0

k=

2

13 1

12 3 2 1 3 0 2 2 k 0

2 3

2

1 3 0

3

1. This criterion is also known as 1. Van Mises criterion is also known as

maximum shear stress criterion and distortion energy yield criterion. It states

attributes yielding to slip that yielding occurs when deformation

phenomenon which occurs when energy per unit volume of material

maximum shear stress exceeds a exceeds certain value which is

value, characteristic to the material. characteristic of the material.

Mathematically it can be stated as Mathematically, it can be stated as

1 3 0

31

0

1

( 1 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2

2

stresses, and 1 2 3 .

( 3 1 ) 2 1 / 2

Or

1

σ0 (σ σ y ) 2 ) 2 (σ y σ z ) 2

2 x

( z x ) 2

( 2 xy 2 yz 2 zx ) 1/ 2

2. The application of this yield criterion

ductile materials and hence

holds good for both ductile and brittle

application of this criterion is limited

materials.

to ductile materials. This criterion do

not yield good results for brittle

materials.

3. Von Mises criterion take into considera

intermediate principal stress and this

tion the intermediate principal stress and

is a major draw back of this.

hence move realistic. The predications

offered by Von Mises criterion conforms

empirical data.

4. 4. The yield stress predicted by Von Mises

criterion is 15. 5% greater than the yield

stress predicted by Tresca criterion.

It is Hexagonal. It is Elliptical.

32

Superimposed

6. Tresca criterion is preferred in analysis

more accuracy is desired.

for simplicity.

Biaxial stress condition is assumed to present locus of yield point on plane paper.

1 , 3 , 2 0

33

Fig. 11 : Tresca yield locus. In the six sectors, the following conditions apply:

I 3 1 0, so 3 Y II

3 1 0, so 3 Y

III 1 0 3 , so 1 3 Y IV 0 1 3 0, so 3 Y

V 0 3 1 , so 1 Y VI 3 0 1 , so 3 1 Y

1. For a biaxial plane stress condition ( 2 0) the Von Mises criterion can be expressed

mathematically,

12 3 2 1 3 0 2

This the equation of an ellipse whose major semiaxis is 2 0 and whose minor semiaxis is

2

0 . The plot of equation is called a yield locus.

3

Fig. 12

34

\Comments

1. Yielding will occur if the point representing the given stress is plotted and is on the boundary or

outside the boundary.

2. The yield locus of maximum shear stress criterion [Tresca criterion] fall inside the maximum

distortion energy criterion [Von Mises] yield locus.

3. Two yield criteria predict the same yield stress for conditions of uniaxial stress and balanced

biaxial stress (1 3 ). The greatest divergence between the two criteria occurs for pure shear

(1 3 ).

4. The yield stress predicted by the Von Mises criterion is 15.5% greater than the yield stress,

predicted by Tresca criterion.

Derive a mathematical expression for Von Mises yield criterion applicable to plane strain stress

condition:

Solution:

Von Mises yield criterion is stated as

(1 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2 2 0 2

where 1 , 2 , 3 are three principal stresses and 0 is the yield strength of material. In plane strain

stress condition, the intermediate principal stress is arithmetic mean of other two. Assuming

1 2 3 , we can write

3

2 1

2

2 2

3 3

1 1 1 3 3 1 2 2 0 2

2 2

(1 3 ) 2 (1 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2

2 02

4 4 1

35

( 1 3 ) 2

2 02

4

(1 3 ) 2 8 / 6 0 2

2

1 3 0 0'

3

0 ' is called constrained strength of material and is 115 times the yield strength under uniaxial tensile

test.

PROBLEM

A stress analysis of a space craft structural member gives the state of stress as below:

200 30 0

Tij 30 100 0

0 0 50

If the part is made of aluminium alloy with strength 500 MPa, will it exhibit yielding as per Tresca yield

criterion and von Mises yield criterion? If not, what is the safety factor?

Data given:

x 200 MPa

y 100 MPa

z 50 MPa

Tx y 30 MPa

1/ 2

1

2

c

x y 2 y z 2 z x 2 6 T 2 T 2 T 2

2 x y y z z x

1/ 2

1 2

200 100 100 50 50 200 6 30 0 0

2 2 2 2 2

c

2

c 224 MPa

The calculated stress ( c ) is less than the yield strength of the material ( 0 ) , yielding will not occur as

per von Mises criterion

36

0 500 MPa

Factor of safety = = 2.2

c 224 MPa

In order to apply this criterion, it is necessary to know the magnitude and sign of three principal

stresses stress situation can be written in matrix form.

x

Tij Tyx y Tyz 30 100 0

T Tzy z 0 0 50

zx

20 3 0

3 10 0 10

0 0 5

20 3 0

3 10 0 0

0 0 5

I1 = x y z 20 10 5 25

I2 + T + T

Txy y yz z z

xz

= 191 50 100

I2 = 41

I 3 Tij

10 0 3 0 3 10

20 3 0

0 5 0 5 10 0

= 1000 + 45

I3 = 955

f ( ) 3 I1 2 I 2 I 3 0

37

3 25 2 41 955 0

f () 3 25 2 41 955 0

f(y) = y3 + py2 + qy + r = 0

p = 25

q = 41

r = 955

a=

1

3

1

3q p 2 3 41 625

3

a = 167.3

b=

1

27

2p 3 9 pq 27 r

=

1

27

2(25) 3

9(25) (41) 27(955)

b = 139.25

b 139.25

3 3

Cos = a 167.3

2 2

3 3

= 99.620

100

a

g = 2×

3

g = 14.94

P 99.62 25

y1 = g cos 14.94 cos

3 3 3 3

y1 = 20.83

38

P 99.62 25

y2 = g cos 120 14.94 cos 120

3 3 3 3

y1 = 5

P 99.62 25

y3 = g cos 249 14.94 cos 240

3 3 3 3

y3 = 9.16

3 = 5 × 10 = 50 MPa

1 3 208.3 ( 50)

Tmax = 129.15 MPa

2 2

0

Tmax < 250 MPa

2

0 / 2 250

Factor of safety = 1.94

Tmax 129.15

PROBLEM

1. A thin walled tube with closed ends is to be subjected to maximum internal stress pressure of 0.35

N/mm2 in service. The mean radius of the tube is to be 304.8 mm and it is not to yield in any

region.

a. If the material has 0 = 7 N/mm2, what minimum thickness ‘t’ should be specified according to

Tresca and von Mises criterion.

b. If the shear yield strength ‘K’ , were specified as 2.8 N/mm2, find ‘t’.

39

Soln:

pr

a. 1 = hoop stress

t

pr

2 = axial stress

2t

3 = 0 radial stress

1 3 0

pr

0

t

0.35 304. 8

7

t

t = 15.24 mm

1

2

2

(1 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2 2 0 2

2 2

1 1 1 0

2

0 1 2 2 0 2

2

12 12

12 2 0 2

4 4

6 12

2 0 2

4

2

1 0

3

p r 2

60

t 3

0.35 304.8 2

7

t 3

40

t = 13.19 mm

when 0 is the specified property and ‘t’ is the unknown, the Tresca criterion is more

conservative.

b. K = 2.8 N/mm2

Using Tresca criterion

1 3 = 2K

pr

2K

t

0.35 304.8

2 2 .8

t

t = 19.05 mm

(1 2 ) 2 ( 2 3 ) 2 ( 3 1 ) 2 6K 2

612

6K 2

4

1 2 K

p r

2K

t

0.35 304.8

2 2. 8

t

t = 19.05 mm

NOTE:

When ‘K’ is the specified property, both criteria predict the same value for ‘t’.

2. Consider the same problem as above except that ‘t’ is specified as being 25.4 mm and the values of

0 and K are unknown using both yield criteria.

a. Determine the value of 0 to prevent yielding.

41

a. Tresca criterion:

1 3 0

pr

0

t

pr pr

1 ; 2 ; 3 0

t t

0.35 304. 8

0

25.4

0 = 4.2 N/mm2

von Mises criterion

2

1 0

3

2 3 0.35 304.8

0 3 1

2 2 25.4

0 3.64 N / mm 2

b. 1 2K

4.2

K=

2

K = 2.1 N/mm2

6 12

6K2

4

1 2K

K = 2.1 N/mm2

****************

42

- Experiment 5 - Tensile TestUploaded bySubuk T. Rathod
- Fundamentals of Engineering PlasticityUploaded bypragerspole
- ANSYS Workbench StaticUploaded byAditya Dave
- Plasticity-Failure Theories Lecture NotesUploaded byzaheer
- Failure Theories.pdfUploaded byRavi Sharma
- Mmf Experiment No 1Uploaded bybmdbmdbmd
- PlasticityUploaded byabhi16
- jntuk_m_tech_r16_md_syllabus.pdfUploaded byBajibabu Indurthi
- shaft part 1Uploaded bylin_meckylogi
- 7___8_SyllabusUploaded byHarish H
- Mechanical PropertiesUploaded bySusanta Baidya
- Stress Strain CurveUploaded byGuru Prasanna
- 2009-08-25 Kinder Morgan Ltr to PHMSA Re MEP Special Permit & Joint Replacement Search AbleUploaded bypalblackburn
- 08 Plasticity 06 Strain HardeningUploaded bymicael_89
- STATIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF AN ADVANCED POWER TILLER CHASSIS AND CHISEL PLOUGHUploaded byTJPRC Publications
- Sti0808 HillUploaded byChristopher Garcia
- Machinedesign.com Article a Simpler Way to Predict BoltUploaded bypvssrh
- Damage Assessment of Offshore Riser-guards Under AUploaded byKausik Dalui
- Chapter 1 Stress StrainUploaded byXander Zander
- 3.1.20 - Ms13-001 Design Equations for Plates Subjected to Heat Loads and Lateral PressureUploaded byKishore Mylavarapu
- STRUCTURAL LINEARITY AND NON-LINEARITY.Uploaded byIJAR Journal
- ch-2-stress-strainsandyieldcriterion-110923212911-phpapp02.docUploaded byKshitij Mishra
- 01_Fundamentals of Metalworking-2017son01Uploaded byemre
- Rel Notes v161Uploaded byzebra00
- 01 CFF Fracture NNUploaded byTapas Das
- Exercise2-110400Uploaded bySaurabh Mishra
- 20080923014610_13001_67Uploaded byChaitanya Kumar Munipalli
- Midterm SampleUploaded byTahir
- petroleroUploaded byNinoska Evelyn Silvestre Nina
- ABAQUSinputsUploaded byDaniel Okere

- Bahan MPTUploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi
- Tranmission Electron MicroscopyUploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi
- Scanning Electron MicroscopyUploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi
- Stress n Strain n Kriteria LULUHUploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi
- Final Exam Statmech 2013Uploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi
- UniMasr.com_f0922f3495133e72e29ab20ecea19ee2.docxUploaded byRuth Limbo
- Jawaban Fentrans PR 3Uploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi
- MAK205_Chapter3Uploaded byGuo Jing
- Tugas 1 Metfis 2 - KikiUploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi
- How to Write an EssayUploaded byRizki Yuni Pratiwi

- Complete GURSON material modelUploaded byCyril Vomáčka
- IPC2012-90416Uploaded byMarcelo Varejão Casarin
- Pressure VesPressure Vessel Failures - Hayes1996sel Failures - Hayes1996Pressure Vessel Failures - Hayes1996Uploaded bysagar1503
- noneUploaded byhadianatya
- Folds, Faults & MountainsUploaded byshara000
- Theories of Yielding.pdfUploaded byJowesh Goundar
- Failure_Static Loading.pptUploaded byHunain Qazi
- Study Material Classxiphy Unit 5 10Uploaded byAsit Kumar Roy
- Stress Calculation for Aluminium PlateUploaded byJacques Ontal
- ASTM A 47 M Ferritic Malleable Iron Castings.pdfUploaded byAhmad Zaid
- Young ModulusUploaded byAh Junz Yi
- Questions and Answers on the Marine Diesel EngineUploaded byfarouk
- Castellated Shape Honey Comb01Uploaded bysishar
- Strength of Materials [Part I & II] - TimoshenkoUploaded byJuan David Zapata Oliveros
- A Review of Seismic Isolation for BuildingsUploaded bySebastian Zegarra Araujo
- Fire Exposed Steel Columns With a Thermal Gradient Over the Cross-sectionUploaded byReaditReadit
- Diseño piezas plástico IUploaded byFrancisco López Rodríguez
- 05_MTPIEUploaded bySujay Menasinkai
- 2003Lam and Teng - Design-Oriented Stress–Strain Model for FRP-confined ConcreteUploaded byFilipe Ribeiro
- Gen_Eurocode2_Design.pdfUploaded bywoex20
- Mechanical PropertiesUploaded byUmesh Chandra
- BronzeUploaded bytrio akhirul anwar
- 663.pdfUploaded byAgustin Jose Marcuzzi
- Thermal Ratcheting of a BeamUploaded bymilan44
- Aircraft Structures Complete NotesUploaded byAarjav Pandya
- DNV RP F108Uploaded byVicknesh Thanabal
- Design of Seismic Resistant Steel Building Structures-Concentrically_Braced_FramesUploaded byAžar Pl
- Beermom Ism FmUploaded byLucasFreitas
- ASTM D6364Uploaded byHugoStiglic
- PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE MASONRY SHEAR WALLS WITH INTEGRAL CONFINED CONCRETE BOUNDARY ELEMENTSUploaded byDeep Eyes