Evaluation
Rubric




Ministry
Level







Beyond
Expectations
 Five
 5
(Excellent/Outstanding)
 
 o Command
of
language,
 vocabulary,
and
 terminology
superior.
 o Clearly
confident
in
 speaking
skills
 o Dressed
the
part
for
the
 role.
 o Information
beyond
level
 4
in
completeness
and
 accuracy.
 o Handouts
/
Presentation
 was
well
written
and
 meaningful.
 o Works
excellently
with
 team
members.
 o Went
above
and
beyond
 assigned
tasks.
 o Delegated
tasks
and/or
 assisted
team
members.
 o Was
able
to
address
and
 solve
group
problems.


Below
Expectations
 One
 Marking
Scheme
 0/1
(Inadequate/Poor)
 
 
 Communication
Skills
 o Did
not
verbally
participate.
 1. 
Showed
confidence
 o Did
not
meaningfully
 in
role.
 contribute
to
discussion.
 2. Spoke
well/
had
 superior
command
 of
language.
 Presentation

 o Some
information
 1. Created
handouts
or
 inaccurate.
 a
presentation.
 o No
preparation
was
 2. Made
an
effort
to
 evident.
 accurately
assume
 o Handouts
/
Presentation
 role.
 did
not
meaningfully
 3. Clear
evidence
of
 contribute
to
the
 background
 discussion.
 research.
 Teamwork
 o 
Did
not
contribute
within
 1. Clear
evidence
of
 groups
and
in
charrette.
 contribution.
 o 
Was
not
cooperative
 2. Cooperates
well
 and/or
started
conflicts
 with
others.
 within
the
group.



Meets
Expectations
 Two
 2.5
(Adequate/Marginal)
 
 o Terminology
and
 vocabulary
lacking
or
 confused.
 o Was
not
confident
in
 speaking.



 Three
 Four
 3.5
(Good)
 4.5
(Very
Good)
 
 
 o Adequate
use
of
the
 o Proper
and
effective
 language
and
 use
of
language,
 appropriate
 vocabulary,
and
 vocabulary.
 terminology.
 o Some
confidence
 o Clearly
confident
in
 shown.
 speaking
skills.
 o Minor
details
were
 o Information
was
 o Dressed
the
part
for
 missing
or
inaccurate.
 complete
and
accurate.
 the
role.
 o Handouts
/
Presentation
 o Handouts
/
 o Information
 were
relevant
but
 Presentation
was
 complete,
accurate,
 incomplete.
 helpful
but
lacking
key
 and
well
summarized.
 points.
 o Handouts
/
 Presentation
was
well
 written
and
 meaningful.
 o 
Did
not
follow‐through
 o Followed‐through
and
 o Followed‐through
and
 fully
with
assigned
 contributed
to
the
 fully
contributed
with
 duties.
 group
by
completing
 assigned
tasks.
 o Contributed
a
small
 assigned
tasks.
 o Works
excellently
 amount
to
the
group.
 o Works
excellently
with
 with
team
members.
 team
members.
 o Assisted
team
 members.



 Comments/Observations/Conference
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 Student
Signature
______________________________________________________
Teacher
Signature
____________________________________________________














 
 


Based
on
evaluation
scheme
found
in
Creating
Integrated
Curriculum
(1998)
by
Susan
Drake


Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful