Evaluation
Rubric






Ministry
Level


Below
Expectations

One

0/1
(Inadequate/Poor)


o Did
not
submit
timeline.

o No
information
was

cited.


Meets
Expectations

Two

Marking
Scheme

2.5
(Adequate/Marginal)



Timeline

o Limited
research.


1. Information
complete

More
details

2. 
Accurate
(and
cited

necessary.



where
necessary).

o Provides
no
evidence

of
critical
thinking
to

evaluate
content.

o Some
information
was

not
cited.

Narrative
Content


o Did
not
submit
narrative.
 o Adequate
use
of
the

1. Corresponds
to
timeline

 o Some
inconsistencies

language
and

2. Superior
command
of

with
timeline.

appropriate
vocabulary

the
language.

o Terminology
and

utilized.

vocabulary
lacking
or

o Some
inconsistencies

confused.

with
timeline.

Illustration

o Did
not
submit

o Somewhat
consistent

1. Images
match
words.

illustration.

and
appropriate.

o Illustration
was
difficult

to
understand
and

unappealing.

o Images
did
not
make

sense
with
topic.

Writing
Mechanics:


o Many
major
grammar
or
 o Few
major
grammar
or

Grammar
and
Spelling

spelling
errors.

spelling
errors.














 


Three

3.5
(Good)


o Information
was

complete
and
accurate.

o Information
was
cited

and
more
than
one

source
was
used.

o


o Good
use
of
vocabulary

and
terminology.

o No
inconsistencies
with

timeline.


o Illustration
logical
and

concise.


o Few
minor
grammar
or

selling
errors.



Beyond
Expectations

Four

Five

4.5
(Very
Good)

5
(Excellent/Outstanding)



o Information
complete,
 o Information
beyond
level
4

accurate,
and
well

in
completeness
and

summarized.

accuracy.

o All
information
cited

o Information
fully
cited
and

and
more
than
one

several
sources
were
used.

source
was
used.


o No
inconsistencies
with

timeline.

o Proper
and
effective

use
of
language,

vocabulary,
and

terminology.

o Illustration
logical
and

concise.

o Can
be
easily

interpreted.


o Command
of
language,

vocabulary,
and

terminology
superior.

o No
inconsistencies
with

timeline.


o A
couple
of
minor

grammar
or
spelling

errors
evident.


o No
grammar
or
spelling

errors
evident.


o Presentation
beyond
level
4

in
organization
and

attractiveness.

o Can
be
easily
interpreted.


Based
on
evaluation
scheme
found
in
Creating
Integrated
Curriculum
(1998)
by
Susan
Drake


Evaluation
Rubric




Creativity

o 
Lacks
detail.

o 
Somewhat
detailed.

o Somewhat
detailed.

o Content
is
detailed.

o Content
is
thorough
and

1. Personification
evident.
 o Lacks
personification
and
 o Personification
and

o Successful
personification
 o Good
amount
of

detailed.

2. Details
exemplary.

imagery
techniques.

imagery
techniques

and
imagery
techniques,

personification
and

o Excellent
amount
of

3. Imagery
included.

unsuccessfully

but
could
use
more.

imagery
used.

personification
and
imagery

attempted.

used.


Comments/Observations/Conference
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Student
Signature
______________________________________________________
Teacher
Signature
_____________________________________________














 


Based
on
evaluation
scheme
found
in
Creating
Integrated
Curriculum
(1998)
by
Susan
Drake


Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful