9 views

Original Title: Significance of Transformed Section Properties in Analysis for Required Prestressing_jl-02-november-december-7.pdf

Uploaded by Nguyen Quoc Vu

- Section4.3.pdf
- Exceptions of Precast Prestressed Concrete Members to Minimum Reinforcement Requirements
- Applications of Self-Compacting Concrete in Japan, Europe and the United States
- Appendix E - Glossary
- Thin-Shell Concrete Dome Built Economically With Rotating Forming and Shoring System_tcm45-342154
- GATP10
- Stress and Strain in Asphalt Pavements
- Water Tank
- Building a Fish Pond
- Diploma Civil Project
- ListOfAITECH AccreditedTechnologies March2016 (1)
- Is 6061 (Part-I) Code of Practice for Construction of Floor
- is.10270.1982
- Ramset Specifiers Anchoring Resource Book ANZ - TruBolt mechanical anchoring.pdf
- Chemplast - PR 155
- Jl 07 September October 5 Part6
- casti1978
- IRJET-Effect of External Prestressing on Steel Arches
- 1-s2.0-S0008884614000106-main
- I-2.1_jul05_V8

You are on page 1of 4

The comments and opinions expressed herein are those of the contributing

author and do not necessarily reflect official PCI policy. Some of the provided

answers may have alternate solutions. Reader comments are invited.

in Analysis for Required Prestressing

Q1: For bridge girder design, our computer computations the area of steel, and then the net area has to be supple-

using transformed section analysis reduce the number of mented by a transformed steel to concrete area equal to n

prestressing strands required by as many as 10 strands. Can times the steel area.

we save this much strand just by converting from gross sec- In older days of prestressed concrete, the effect of the

tion to transformed section analysis? more precise transformed section was not considered be-

cause prestressing forces were smaller and electronic com-

A1: The use of transformed section analysis is more accu- putation tools, such as spreadsheet programs, were not

rate than gross section analysis. As long as we have steel available. Thus, it was conservative to ignore the differences

that is assumed to be bonded to the concrete, any loading between gross concrete section, net concrete section, and

applied, including prestress transfer to the concrete member, transformed concrete section.

acts on a composite section of steel and concrete. This inter- Since the analysis being considered is a linear elastic

action is taken into account by converting the steel area to analysis, it only affects service limit states. The most impor-

an equivalent precast concrete area, by multiplying the steel tant stress limit is the concrete tension at final condition due

area by (n – 1), where n is the modular ratio Eps /Ec, where to full loads plus effective prestress. For bridges in particu-

Eps and Ec are the modulus of elasticity of prestressing steel lar, the limit cannot exceed 6 fc′ , and a number of states

and concrete, respectively, at the time of application of the limit it even further. Transformed section analysis reduces

load being considered. The (–1) value in the (n – 1) term the bottom fiber tensile stress due to gravity loads and thus

recognizes that steel is replaced with concrete, and the reduces the demand for prestressing in order to meet the

“hole” left from the removal of steel is filled with concrete. code stress limit.

Thus the (n – 1) factor should be used in conjunction with Prestress loss estimates by AASHTO formulas were

gross concrete section properties. If net concrete section based on the assumption that gross section properties are

properties are to be used, the gross area has to be reduced by used in the concrete stress analysis. Unless these formulas

section.

2 PCI JOURNAL

are modified, transformed section analysis may be incorrect

and misleading. If the proper loss components are accounted

for, the difference in results between the approximate gross

section analysis and the more accurate transformed section

analysis is not expected to be large.

count in transformed section analysis compared to gross

section of analysis.

elongation gain at the time of application of gravity loads

must be isolated and subtracted from the total prestress loss

to obtain the long-term loss due to creep and shrinkage of

concrete and relaxation of steel. When external loads, in-

cluding initial prestress just before transfer to concrete, are

introduced to a transformed section, the elastic losses or

gains are automatically accounted for. The long-term loss

should be applied to the net concrete section that exists dur-

ing the time of its development. Long-term loss between

transfer and deck placement should be applied to the net

precast section. Long-term loss between time of deck place-

ment and final time should be applied to the net composite

girder/deck section. However, the latter long-term loss com-

ponent is a small fraction of the total long-term loss and is

generally not separated out in most loss prediction methods.

It is therefore acceptable and slightly more conservative to

apply the total long-term loss to the net precast section or Fig. 2. AASHTO-PCI BT-72 dimensions.

even the gross precast section.

Q3: Please give an example illustrating your point. provided in Fig. 2. Dimensions of the composite section are

given in Fig. 3. The properties of various cross sections and

A3: Consider Example 9.4 of the PCI Bridge Design midspan moments for the example are given in Tables 1 and

Manual (BDM), a single-span AASHTO-PCI bulb-tee 2, respectively. The following data summarize the material

girder bridge (BT-72), with bridge cross section as shown in properties of the prestressing strand, precast bridge girder,

Fig. 1. Cross-sectional dimensions of the BT-72 girder are and cast-in-place deck:

Fig. 3. Dimensions

of the composite

section.

November-December 2002 3

Table 1. Properties of various sections.

Section A (sq in.) I (in.4) Yb (in.) α = 1 + A*ep*ep /I α b = 1 + A*ep*yb /I

Gross precast cross section 767 545,894 36.60 2.2377 2.5263

Net precast cross section 760 539,362 36.89 2.2648 2.5569

Gross composite section 1419 1,089,063 54.59 3.9530 4.3801

Net composite section 1395 1,064,857 54.59 4.0147 4.4484

Transformed section at release 805 577,779 35.20 2.1142 2.3869

Transformed section at service 802 575,765 35.29 2.1216 2.3952

Transformed composite section 1454 1,167,708 53.42 3.6874 4.0858

Note: 1 in. = 25.4 mm; 1 sq in. = 645 mm2; 1 in.4 = 416,231 mm4.

Table 2. Applied moments at midspan for Service III cations is made up of four components:

stress analysis, for calculating bottom fiber stress.

Loads M (kip-in.) Elastic loss at transfer = 18.90 ksi

Beam weight, Mg 17,258 Shrinkage = 17 – 0.15H

Deck weight, Ms 19,915 = 17 – 0.15(70)

Superimposed dead load, Msd 6480 = 6.50 ksi

Live load, Ml 25,666 Creep = 12fcgp – 7fcdp

Note: 1 kip-in. = 0.113 kN-m. = 12(3.061) – 7(–0.981 – 0.256)

= 28.07 ksi

Relaxation = 6 – 0.12∆fpES – 0.06(∆fpSR + ∆fpCR)

Table 3. Elastic losses and gains due to external loads, = 6 – 0.12(18.9) – 0.06(6.5 + 28.07)

(initial prestress just before transfer is considered an = 1.66 ksi

external load).

Concrete stress at The total long-term loss according to AASHTO LRFD is

Loading centroid of strands (ksi) Elastic loss/gain 6.50 + 28.07 + 1.66 = 36.23 ksi. Slightly different values for

Initial 3.061 18.90 ksi

creep and relaxation losses are given in the Bridge Design

Deck weight –0.981 –5.72 ksi

SIDL –0.256 –1.50 ksi

Manual because gross section properties are used to approx-

LL –1.016 –5.92 ksi imate net section properties. The long-term loss in the BDM

Note: 1 ksi = 0.006895 kN-mm2.

is 6.50 + 26.60 + 1.80 = 34.90 ksi.

Since the loss formulas in AASHTO LRFD were devel-

oped on the assumption that designers use gross section

properties, the long-term loss includes an allowance for

Prestressing strands:

elastic gain due to deck weight and superimposed dead load

48 – 1/2 in. dia., 270 ksi, low-relaxation strand, Aps =

(SIDL). These two components must be excluded if trans-

7.344 sq in., yps relative to bottom fibers = 6.92 in., Eps =

formed section properties are used to calculate concrete

28,500 ksi, fpi = 202.5 ksi

stresses.

An exact analysis can be undertaken in one of two ways:

Precast girder:

1. Apply an initial prestress of 202.50 ksi plus dead and

f ci′ = 5.8 ksi, Eci = 4617 ksi, ni = Eps /Eci = 6.17

live loads to the transformed section properties. Apply true

f c′ = 6.5 ksi, Ec = 4888 ksi, n = Eps /Ec = 5.83

long-term losses of 43.45 ksi to net section properties.

2. Apply all the forces mentioned in Item 1 to net section

C.I.P. deck:

properties. In addition, apply the elastic loss at transfer,

f c′ = 4.0 ksi, Ecd = 3834 ksi, nd = Ecd /Ec = 0.78

18.90 ksi, and the elastic gain due to deck weight (–5.72

ksi), SIDL (–1.50 ksi), and live load (–5.92 ksi) separately

Relative humidity = 70 percent

as external loads on net section properties.

The results of these two procedures are compared in

There are two options for calculating elastic loss or gain

Table 4 with the results of the current practice of calculation

due to various effects: Option A, using transformed section

using gross section properties.

analysis, and Option B, using an iterative net section analy-

sis. Using Option B with gross section properties used to ap-

Q4: What do you recommend as the best approach for

proximate net section properties is the common practice at

calculation of bottom fiber stress at service, assuming that I

present. The values for this example are summarized in

would like to use the AASHTO LRFD Refined Method for

Table 3. The initial elastic loss of 18.90 given in Table 3

loss prediction?

was calculated using transformed section properties. The

elastic shortening loss of 18.60 ksi reported in the BDM,

A4: The best solution is the most exact one within the

which was calculated iteratively using gross precast section

limitations of the AASHTO LRFD loss formulas. First, cal-

properties, is slightly different.

culate initial stress due to prestress force just before release

The prestress loss according to AASHTO LRFD Specifi-

and member weight. Use transformed section properties

4 PCI JOURNAL

Table 4. Bottom fiber stress by various methods.

Net section (exact) Approximate gross section (current practice)

Transformed Elastic Elastic

Cause section (exact) (ksi) Loading (ksi) loss/gain (ksi) Net (ksi) Loading (ksi) loss/gain (ksi) Net (ksi)

Initial prestress 4.410 5.006 –0.596 4.410 4.898 –0.450 4.448

Self-weight –1.051 –1.180 +0.129 –1.051 –1.157

Deck weight –1.221 –1.362 0.141 –1.221 –1.335 – –1.335

SIDL –0.294 –0.329 0.035 –0.294 –0.323 – –0.323

Long-term loss –1.074 –1.074 – –1.074 –0.844 – –0.844

LL –1.166 –1.303 0.137 –1.166 –1.278 – –1.278

Net –0.397 –0.397 –0.488

Note: 1 ksi = 0.006895 kN-mm2.

Loading Transformed section (exact) (ksi) Gross section (approximate) (ksi)

Initial prestress plus self-weight 4.410 – 1.051 = 3.359 4.898 – 0.583 – 1.157 + 0.126 = 3.284

Long-term loss –1.074 0.138 + 0.036 – 1.051 + 0.143 = –0.734*

Deck weight –1.221 –1.335

Superimposed dead loads –0.294 –0.323

Live load –1.166 –1.278

Net –0.397 –0.386

* Includes long-term losses and elastic gains due to deck weight, superimposed DL, and LL.

Note: 1 ksi = 0.006895 kN-mm2.

based on the concrete modulus of elasticity at time of pre- tice is to use the gross precast and gross composite sections.

stress transfer. Disregard the LRFD formula for elastic loss For that solution to be equivalent to the exact solution, one

at transfer. Then calculate the stress due to deck weight ap- should account for the elastic loss at transfer, which is gen-

plied to the precast transformed section at time of deck erally done now. In addition, the designer should include an

placement (i.e., using Ec of the girder) and the stress due to allowance in the long-term loss formula for the elastic gain

superimposed dead load (SIDL) applied to the transformed due to deck weight and superimposed dead and live loads.

composite section. The stresses due to these three loading These elastic gain values may be estimated using gross sec-

cases should be calculated at the bottom fiber and again at tion properties, in place of the more accurate transformed

the centroid of the strand. The stresses at the centroid of the section properties, by multiplying the concrete stress at steel

strand should then be used to calculate the LRFD long-term centroid by the modular ratio. Each steel stress gain is then

loss. Before the long-term loss is used in concrete stress cal- multiplied by the steel area, and the resulting force is as-

culation, elastic gain due to deck and SIDL must be ex- sumed as an additional prestress force applied to the gross

cluded (increasing the quantity you assign to long-term concrete section. The results of both the preferred exact so-

loss). The long-term loss should be applied to the net precast lution and the acceptable approximate solution are summa-

concrete section (which is very close to the gross section). rized in Table 5.

Since the LRFD long-term loss does not explicitly give a

breakdown of the loss before and after composite action oc- [Contributed by Shane A. Hennessey, Project Engineer,

curs, it is reasonable to apply the entire long-term loss to the Tadros Associates, LLC, Omaha, Nebraska, and

precast-only section. Finally, calculate the concrete bottom Maher K. Tadros, Cheryl Prewett Professor of Civil

fiber stress due to live load using the transformed composite Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln,

section. Omaha, Nebraska.]

The approximate solution currently used in common prac-

November-December 2002 5

- Section4.3.pdfUploaded byRavi Shankar
- Exceptions of Precast Prestressed Concrete Members to Minimum Reinforcement RequirementsUploaded byunix0123
- Applications of Self-Compacting Concrete in Japan, Europe and the United StatesUploaded byvallymufigi
- Appendix E - GlossaryUploaded byJunwhan Kim
- Thin-Shell Concrete Dome Built Economically With Rotating Forming and Shoring System_tcm45-342154Uploaded byTravis Hughey
- GATP10Uploaded byGogy
- Stress and Strain in Asphalt PavementsUploaded byPra Kaa
- Water TankUploaded bySamik Sen
- Building a Fish PondUploaded byAndry Harmony
- Diploma Civil ProjectUploaded byMukesh Sharma
- ListOfAITECH AccreditedTechnologies March2016 (1)Uploaded byCiara Sultan
- Is 6061 (Part-I) Code of Practice for Construction of FloorUploaded bySandeep Goyal
- is.10270.1982Uploaded byAnonymous GoJpm9Wb
- Ramset Specifiers Anchoring Resource Book ANZ - TruBolt mechanical anchoring.pdfUploaded byGibbs Per
- Chemplast - PR 155Uploaded byICPL-RWP
- Jl 07 September October 5 Part6Uploaded bylinghuchong
- casti1978Uploaded byXtem Alb
- IRJET-Effect of External Prestressing on Steel ArchesUploaded byIRJET Journal
- 1-s2.0-S0008884614000106-mainUploaded byJudy Tan
- I-2.1_jul05_V8Uploaded byKatracho2
- Types of Design and Detailing Errors in Construction and Their PreventionUploaded bykaykaysoft
- MNL-133-97_ch8_2Uploaded byJosue Lewandowski
- Endsem_QuestionPaper (1)Uploaded byAswinRajeevan
- Ketikan Lab BahanUploaded byAwank Mawank
- Chemplast PR 155Uploaded byghazanfar
- Epoxy Compund VocabUploaded byBriteman Jefferson
- eagle scout proposalUploaded byapi-371222600
- Uae Tds Chrysorplast Me 200aUploaded bySajin Bs
- Properties of Fresh ConcreteUploaded byJorgeBravoG.
- C450PLUS Structural Tube Product BrochureUploaded bydoshi78

- Steel Sheet Piling Design ManualUploaded byv
- 15001-083-DW-3522-001-B1Uploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- 22TCN 210-92Uploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- 787 Cbls Stc Sxd Gia Vlxd Vung Tau t3 2014Uploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Mai nha QN (1)Uploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Anphabet for KIDUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- SL6000 SpecUploaded byteamegi
- Rigid PavementsUploaded byVizag Roads
- Axial DesignUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Civil Engineering_ Fc and Fcu, Cylinder and Cube Strengths for ConcreteUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- DWG.5-2_Location of EarthingUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Grating VietUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- ben tauUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- LadderUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- IDT Instalacion Manual3016_USMetricUploaded byCarlos Garcia
- 29-5-3_Nishida.pdfUploaded byTinh Huynh
- 10 - Weld Design.pdfUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- SoTayToanHocCaoCapUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Bearing Capacity of SoilsUploaded byMuqeem Khan
- TCVN 7711_2013_PCB Ben Sun PhatUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Gr l Weap 2010 Whats New 2010Uploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- 3230 QD BGTVT Concrete PavingUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Chapter 6 - Seismic DesignUploaded byArindam Dhar
- Drainage Manual - MINNESOTA DOT, 2000.pdfUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- 6-Vietnam Joint Seminar(Yoshioka)Uploaded byJan Gnat
- Tensar Structural SolutionsUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Aashto CatalogUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- Calculation of Bending Strength & Shear Strength of I Welded SectionUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu
- 1202_EX Fence for ReferenceUploaded byNguyen Quoc Vu

- pp_fp_2005_003_eng_01.pdfUploaded byYuliusRiefAlkhaly
- TEK 14-05AUploaded byjh50000
- BS-EN-1995Uploaded byNero Perera
- Ir. Daniel R. Teruna, MTUploaded byAsroy Benny Noor Harahap
- ZAPATAS.pdfUploaded byJoe Israel Arévalo Sánchez
- The Causes of Shear Cracking in Prestressed Concrete Box Girder BridgesUploaded byw1000000
- alexander chajes-r.pdfUploaded bySam Monther
- Prestressed StructureUploaded byMOST PASON
- Abstract Jbc 20-40 KmUploaded byVinod Jogur
- Steel+I-Girder+Composite+Bridge.pdfUploaded byShama
- Design & Material Selection for Quality - Vol. 1Uploaded byjebrija
- Cantilever SlabUploaded bysaman2580
- RateUploaded byMM Fakhrul Islam
- IndexUploaded byGunaedy Utomo
- Limit State Design FinalUploaded byHariom Khungar
- Ftgdesign Water TankUploaded byrey
- fema451part1.pdfUploaded byHao Luo
- pileppt-140708125113-phpapp01Uploaded bySuvankar
- Steel Design ProposalUploaded byManuelito Zapata
- Confined MasonryUploaded byBijoy Abraham Varghese
- 126652388-billboard.pdfUploaded bynouman
- Formwork - by Vishwajit MaloUploaded byVivek G. Abhyankar
- Serenia Residential E brochure FA-1Uploaded byNorazmi Abdul Rahman
- Field Training Report Format22-07Uploaded bydhiraj patil
- Compendium of Prospective Emerging Technologies for Mass Housing - Second EditionAttUploaded byElvis Gray
- penetron admixUploaded byBabar Akbar
- Manual on Seismic Evaluation & Retrofit of Multistory Rc BldsUploaded byMUTHUKKUMARAM
- Composite ColumnsUploaded byPrasad GN
- STeelCON PresentationUploaded byIvan Klyuchka
- steel noteUploaded bycustomerx