International Journal of Modern Physics D, Vol. 11, No. 00 (2002) 1–18
c World Scientiﬁc Publishing Company
PERTURBATIONS AND STABILITY OF BLACK ELLIPSOIDS
SERGIU I. VACARU
Centro Multidisciplinar de Astroﬁsica — CENTRA, Departamento de Fisica,
Instituto Superior Tecnico, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049001, Portugal
vacaru@ﬁsica.ist.utl.pt
sergiu vacaru@yahoo.com
Received 17 June 2002
Communicated by A. Ashtekar
We study the perturbations of two classes of static black ellipsoid solutions of four
dimensional vacuum Einstein equations. Such solutions are described by generic oﬀ
diagonal metrics which are generated by anholonomic transforms of diagonal metrics.
The analysis is performed in the approximation of small eccentricity deformations of the
Schwarzschild solution. We conclude that such anisotropic black hole objects may be
stable with respect to the perturbations parametrized by the Schrodinger equations in
the framework of the onedimensional inverse scattering theory.
PACS numbers: 04.20.Jb, 04.70.s, 04.70.Bw
1. Introduction
In a series of works new classes of solutions of fourdimensional (4D) and 5D vacuum
Einstein equations with ellipsoid and toroidal symmetry are constructed.
1
Such
solutions are generated by anholonomic deformations of the Schwarzschild metric,
of static or stationary conﬁgurations and depend anisotropically on angular coordi
nates. They are described by generic oﬀdiagonal metric ansatz which are eﬀectively
diagonalized with respect to anholonomic frames with associated nonlinear con
nection structure. A study of horizons and geodesic behaviour
2,3
concluded that
for small deformations of the spherical symmetry, for instance, to a resolution
ellipsoid one, such solutions deﬁne black ellipsoid like objects (static black holes
with ellipsoidal horizons and anisotropic polarizations of constants). With respect
to anholonomic frames the new solutions are given by certain metric coeﬃcients
which are similar to those of the Reissner–Noredstrom metric, but with an eﬀective,
polarized, “electromagnetic” charge, induced by oﬀdiagonal vacuum gravitational
interactions. This diﬀers substantially from the usual static electrovacuum solutions
with spherical symmetry which are exact solutions of the Einstein–Maxwell equa
tions (see, for instance Ref. 4, as a general reference on “the mathematical theory
of black holes”).
1
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
2 S. I. Vacaru
The aim of this paper is to study perturbations of black ellipsoids and to prove
that there are such static ellipsoid like conﬁgurations which are stable with respect
to perturbations of a ﬁxed type of anisotropy (i.e. for certain imposed anholonomic
constraints). The main idea of such a proof is to consider small (ellipsoidal, or
another type of) deformations of the Schwarzschild metric and than to apply the
already developed methods of the theory of perturbations of classical black hole
solutions, when the but redeﬁnition of the formalism for adapted anholonomic
frames.
The theory of perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime black holes was ini
tiated in Ref. 5, developed in a series of works, e.g. Refs. 6 and 7, and related Ref. 8
to the theory of inverse scattering and its ramiﬁcations (see, for instanse, Refs. 9).
The results on the theory of perturbations and the stability of the Schwarzschild,
Reissner–Nordstrom and Kerr solutions are summarized in a monograph.
4
As alter
native treatments of the stability of black holes we cite in Ref. 10.
The paper has the following structure: In Sec. 2 we introduce an oﬀdiagonal
ansatz which parametrizes two classes of anholonomic static deformations of the
Schwarzschild solutions which describe black ellipsoid like objects (the formulas
for the components of Ricci and Einstein tensors are outlined in the Appendix).
In Sec. 3 we investigate the axial metric perturbations governed by some one
dimensional Schrodinger equations with nonlinear potential and anisotropic gravita
tional polarizations. Section 4 is devoted to a stability analysis of polar metric
perturbations; a procedure of deﬁning formal solutions for polar perturbations is
formulated. In Sec. 5 we prove the stability of static anholonomically deformed solu
tions of the Scwarschild metric with respect to perturbations treated in the frame
work of the inverse scattering theory based on the onedimensional Schrodinger
equation with paremetric potentials. A discussion and conclusions are contained in
Sec. 6.
2. Metrics Describing Perturbations of Anisotropic Black Holes
We consider a fourdimensional pseudoRiemannian quadratic linear element
ds
2
= Ω(r, ϕ)
¸
−
1 −
2m
r
+
ε
r
2
−1
dr
2
−r
2
dθ
2
−η
3
(r, θ, ϕ)r
2
sin
2
θδϕ
2
+
¸
1 −
2m
r
+
ε
r
2
η(r, ϕ)
δt
2
, (1)
with
δϕ = dϕ +εw
1
(r, ϕ)dr , and δt = dt +εn
1
(r, ϕ)dr ,
where the local coordinates are denoted by u = {u
α
= (r, θ, ϕ, t)} (the Greek indices
α, β, . . . will run through the values 1, 2, 3, 4), ε is a small parameter satisfying the
conditions 0 ≤ ε 1 (for instance, an eccentricity for some ellipsoid deformations
of the spherical symmetry) and the functions Ω(r, ϕ), η
3
(r, θ, ϕ) and η(θ, ϕ) are of
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 3
necessary smooth class. The metric (1) is static, oﬀdiagonal and transforms into
the usual Schwarzschild solution if ε → 0 and η
3
→ 1; it describes at least two
classes of static black hole solutions generated as small anhlonomic deformations of
the Schwarzschild solution.
1–3
The geodesic and the horizon structure of the ﬁrst class of solutions was inves
tigated in Ref. 2. It was proved that for the data
η
3
(r, ϕ) = η
3[0]
(r, ϕ) +ελ
3
(r, ϕ) +ε
2
γ
3
(r, ϕ) +· · · ,
η
4
(r, ϕ) = 1 +ελ
4
(r, ϕ) −ε
2
λ
4
(r, ϕ)
1 −
2m
r
−1
+· · · ,
η(r, ϕ) = λ
4
(r, ϕ)(r
2
−2mr) + 1 , Ω = 1 ,
ε
η
3
 = η
0
∂
η
4
/∂ϕ, η
0
= const , w
1
= 0 ,
and
n
1
(r, ϕ) = n
1[1]
(r) +n
1[2]
(r)
dϕη
3
(r, ϕ)
η
4
(ξ, ϕ)
3
, η
∗
4
= 0 ;
= n
1[1]
(r) +n
1[2]
(r)
dϕη
3
(r, ϕ) , η
∗
4
= 0 ;
= n
1[1]
(r) +n
1[2]
(r)
dϕ
η
4
(r, ϕ)
3
, η
∗
3
= 0 ; (2)
where the limit ∂
η
4
/∂ϕ →0 is considered for ε →0 and the functions η
3
(r, ϕ)
and n
1[1,2]
(r) are stated by some boundary conditions, there is a static black hole
with ellipsoidal horizon (a black ellipsoid).
Another class of black ellipsoids with anisotropic conformal symmetries, with a
nontrivial conformal factor Ω which induces a nonzero value for the coeﬃcient w
1
(see details in Ref. 3), can be deﬁned by a metric (1) with the data
Ω(r, ϕ) = 1 −εr
2
sin
2
θη
3
(r, θ, ϕ) ;
η(r, ϕ) = rη
3
(r, θ, ϕ) sin
2
θ(r
2
−2mr)
2
/2m;
w
1
(r, ϕ) = ∂
1
Ω(∂Ω/∂ϕ)
−1
, ∂η
3
/∂ϕ = 0 ,
= 0 , ∂η
3
/∂ϕ = 0 ;
and
n
1
(r, ϕ) = n
1[1]
(r) +n
1[2]
(r)
dϕη
3
(r, ϕ) , (3)
where, for this type of solutions, the function η
3
(r, θ, ϕ) is chosen to have a value
φ(r, ϕ) = η
3
(r, θ, ϕ) sin
2
θ, depending only on variables r and ϕ.
The maximal analytic extensions of such locally anisotropic black hole metrics
in the framework of general relativity theory with anholonomic frames were con
structed in Refs. 2 and 3. It was shown that the condition of vanishing of the coeﬃ
cient 1−2m/r+εη(r, ϕ)/r
2
(to order δt) deﬁnes the equation of a static nonspherical
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
4 S. I. Vacaru
horizon for a so called “locally anisotropic” black hole.
a
There is a similarity of the
metrics of type (1) with the Reissner–Norstrom solution: The anisotropic metric is
obtained as a linear approximation in ε from some exact vacuum solutions of the
Einstein equations, but the Reissner–Norstrom one is a static exact solution of the
Einstein–Maxwell equations.
We can apply the perturbation theory for the metric (1) (not paying any special
attention to some particular parametrization of coeﬃcients for one or another class
of anisotropic black hole solutions) and analyze its stability by using the results of
Ref. 4 for a ﬁxed anisotropic direction, i.e. by imposing certain anholonomic frame
constraints for an angle ϕ = ϕ
0
but considering possible perturbations depending
on three variables (u
1
= x
1
= r, u
2
= x
2
= θ, u
4
= t). If we prove that there
is a stability on perturbations for a value ϕ
0
, we can analyze another values of ϕ
in a similar way. A more general perturbative theory with variable anisotropy on
coordinate ϕ, i.e. with dynamical anholonomic constraints, links the approach with
a twodimensional inverse problem which makes the analysis more sophisticate.
We note that in a study of perturbations of any spherically symmetric system
and, for instance, of small ellipsoid deformations, we can restrict our considerations
to axisymmetric modes of perturbations without any loss of generality. Nonaxisym
metric modes of perturbations with an e
inϕ
dependency on the azimutal angle ϕ
(n being an integer number) can be deduced from modes of axisymmetric per
turbations with n = 0 by suitable rotations since there are no preferred axes in a
spherically symmetric background. The ellipsoidlike deformations may be included
into the formalism as some low frequency and constrained petrurbations.
For simplicity, we restrict our study only to ﬁxed values of the coordinate ϕ
assuming that anholonomic deformations are proportional to a small parameter ε.
We shall investigate the stability of solutions only by applying the onedimensional
inverse methods. The metric (1) to be investigated is with a deformed horizon
and transforms into the usual Schwarszschild solution at long radial distances (see
Refs. 2 and 3 for details on such oﬀdiagonal metrics).
Let us consider a quadratic metric element
ds
2
= −e
2µ1
(du
1
)
2
−e
2µ2
(du
2
)
2
−e
2µ3
(δu
3
)
2
+e
2µ4
(δu
4
)
2
,
δu
3
= dϕ −q
1
dx
1
−q
2
dx
2
−ωdt ,
δu
4
= dt +n
1
dr
(4)
where
µ
α
(x
k
, t) = µ
(ε)
α
(x
k
, ϕ
0
) +δµ
(ς)
α
(x
k
, t) ,
q
i
(x
k
, t) = q
(ε)
i
(r, ϕ
0
) +δq
(ς)
i
(x
k
, t) ,
ω(x
k
, t) = 0 +δω
(ς)
(x
k
, t)
(5)
a
For a corresponding parametrization of η we may construct a resolution ellipsoid horizon.
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 5
with
e
2µ
(ε)
1
= Ω(r, ϕ
0
)
1 −
2m
r
+
ε
r
2
−1
,
e
2µ
(ε)
2
= Ω(r, ϕ
0
)r
2
,
e
2µ
(ε)
3
= Ω(r, ϕ
0
)r
2
sin
2
θη
3
(r, ϕ
0
) ,
e
2µ
(ε)
4
= 1 −
2m
r
+
ε
r
2
η(r, ϕ
0
) ,
(6)
and some nontrivial values for q
(ε)
i
and εn
i
,
q
(ε)
1
= εw
1
(r, ϕ
0
) ,
n
1
= ε
n
1[1]
(r) +n
1[2]
(r)
ϕ0
0
η
3
(r, ϕ)dϕ
.
We are distinguishing two types of small deformations from the spherical sym
metry. The ﬁrst type of deformations, labeled with the index (ε) are generated by
some εterms which deﬁne a ﬁxed ellipsoid like conﬁguration and the second type
ones, labeled with the index (ς), are some small linear ﬂuctuations of the metric
coeﬃcients
The general formulae for the Ricci and Einstein tensors for metric elements
of class (4) with n
1
= 0 are given in Ref. 4. We compute similar values with
respect to anholnomic frames, where, for a conventional splitting u
α
= (x
i
, y
a
), the
coordinates x
i
and y
a
are treated as holonomic and anholonomic ones respectively.
In this case the partial derivatives ∂/∂x
i
must be changed into certain ’elongated’
ones
∂
∂x
1
→
δ
∂x
1
=
∂
∂x
1
−w
1
∂
∂ϕ
−n
1
∂
∂t
,
∂
∂x
2
→
δ
∂x
1
=
∂
∂x
1
−w
2
∂
∂ϕ
−n
2
∂
∂t
,
(see details in Refs 1–3. In the ansatz (4), the anholonomic contributions of w
i
are included in the coeﬃcients q
i
(x
k
, t). There is only one nonzero value w
1
and,
consequently, we have to introduce elongations of partial space derivatives only on
the tvariable. For convenience, in the Appendix we present the necessary formulae
for R
αβ
(the Ricci tensor) and G
αβ
(the Einstein tensor) computed for the ansatz
(4) with three holonomic coordinates (r, θ, ϕ) and one anholonomic coodinate t (in
our case, being timelike), with the partial derivative operators
∂
1
→δ
1
=
∂
∂r
−n
1
∂
∂t
, ∂
2
=
∂
∂θ
, ∂
3
=
∂
∂ϕ
,
and for a ﬁxed value ϕ
0
.
A general perturbation of an anisotropic black hole described by a quadratic
line element (4) results in some small quantities of ﬁrst order in ω and q
i
. Thus
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
6 S. I. Vacaru
induces a dragging of frames and imparting rotations. In some functions µ
α
there
are small increments δµ
α
which do not impart rotations. Some coeﬃcients in these
values are proportional to ε, another ones are considered only as small quantities.
The perturbations of metric are of two generic types: axial and polar one. We
investigate them separately in the next two sections.
3. Axial Metric Perturbations
Axial perturbations are characterized by nonvanishing ω and q
i
which satisfy the
equations
R
3i
= 0 .
The explicit formulas for such coeﬃcients of the Ricci tensor is given in the
Appendix. The resulting equations governing axial perturbations, δR
31
= 0,
δR
32
= 0, are respectively
∂
2
e
3µ
(ε)
3
+µ
(ε)
4
−µ
(ε)
1
−µ
(ε)
2
Q
12
= −e
3µ
(ε)
3
−µ
(ε)
4
−µ
(ε)
1
+µ
(ε)
2
∂
4
Q
14
,
δ
1
e
3µ
(ε)
3
+µ
(ε)
4
−µ
(ε)
1
−µ
(ε)
2
Q
12
= e
3µ
(ε)
3
−µ
(ε)
4
+µ
(ε)
1
−µ
(ε)
2
∂
4
Q
24
,
(7)
where
Q
ij
= δ
i
q
j
−δ
j
q
i
, Q
i4
= ∂
4
q
i
−δ
i
ω (8)
and µ
(ε)
i
are considered unperturbed values. Introducing the values of coeﬃcients
(5) and (6) and assuming that the perturbations have a time dependence of type
exp(iσt) for a real constant σ, we can rewrite (7) as
1 +ε(∆
−1
+ 3r
2
φ/2)
r
4
sin
3
θη
3/2
3
∂
2
Q
(η)
= −iσδ
r
ω −σ
2
q
1
, (9)
∆
r
4
sin
3
θη
3/2
3
δ
1
Q
(η)
¸
1 +
ε
2
η −1
∆
−r
2
φ
¸
= iσ∂
θ
ω +σ
2
q
2
(10)
with
Q
(η)
(r, θ, ϕ
0
, t) = ∆Q
12
sin
3
θ = ∆sin
3
θ(∂
2
q
1
−δ
1
q
2
) , ∆ = r
2
−2mr ,
where φ = 0 when Ω = 1 and φ(r, ϕ) = η
3
(r, θ, ϕ) sin
2
θ, i. e. η
3
(r, θ, ϕ) ∼ sin
−2
θ
for solutions with Ω = 1 +ε.
We can exclude the function ω and deﬁne an equation for Q
(η)
if we sum (9),
subjected by the action of operator ∂
2
, and (10), subjected by the action of operator
δ
1
. Using the relations (8), we write
r
4
δ
1
∆
r
4
η
3/2
3
¸
δ
1
¸
Q
(η)
+
ε
2
η −1
∆
−r
2
φ
¸
+ sin
3
θ∂
2
¸
1 +ε(∆
−1
+ 3r
2
φ/2)
sin
3
θη
3/2
3
∂
2
Q
(η)
+
σ
2
r
4
∆η
3/2
3
Q
(η)
= 0 .
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 7
The solution of this equation can be found in the form Q
(η)
= Q + εQ
(1)
which
results in
r
4
∂
1
∆
r
4
η
3/2
3
∂
1
Q
+ sin
3
θ∂
2
1
sin
3
θη
3/2
3
∂
2
Q
+
σ
2
r
4
∆η
3/2
3
Q = εA(r, θ, ϕ
0
) , (11)
where
A(r, θ, ϕ
0
) = r
4
∂
1
∆
r
4
η
3/2
3
n
1
∂Q
∂t
−r
4
∂
1
∆
r
4
η
3/2
3
∂
1
Q
(1)
−sin
3
θ∂
2
¸
1 + ε(∆
−1
+ 3r
2
φ/2)
sin
3
θη
3/2
3
∂
2
Q
(1)
−
σ
2
r
4
∆η
3/2
3
Q
(1)
¸
,
with a time dependence factor exp[iσt].
It is possible to construct diﬀerent classes of solutions of (11). We ﬁrst ﬁnd the
solution for Q when ε = 0. Then, for a known value of Q(r, θ, ϕ
0
) written in the
form
Q
(η)
= Q+εQ
(1)
,
we can deﬁne Q
(1)
from (9) and (10) by considering the values proportional to ε
which can be written as
∂
1
Q
(1)
= B
1
(r, θ, ϕ
0
) ,
∂
2
Q
(1)
= B
2
(r, θ, ϕ
0
) ,
(12)
where
B
1
= n
1
∂Q
∂t
−
1
2
∂
1
¸
Q
η −1
∆
−r
2
φ
and
B
2
= −(∆
−1
+ 3r
2
φ/2)∂
2
Q−σ
2
r
4
sin
3
θ w
1
.
The integrability condition of the system (12), ∂
1
B
2
= ∂
2
B
1
, imposes a relation
between the polarization functions.
b
η
3
, η, w
1
and n
1
. In order to prove that there
are stable anisotropic conﬁgurations of anisotropic black hole solutions, we may
consider a set of polarization functions when A(r, θ, ϕ
0
) = 0 and the solution with
Q
(1)
= 0 is admitted. This holds, for example, if
∆n
1
= n
0
r
4
η
3/2
3
, n
0
= const .
In this case the axial perturbations are described by the equation
η
3/2
3
r
4
∂
1
∆
r
4
η
3/2
3
∂
1
Q
+ sin
3
θ∂
2
1
sin
3
θ
∂
2
Q
+
σ
2
r
4
∆
Q = 0 (13)
which is obtained from (11) for η
3
= η
3
(r, ϕ
0
) , or for φ(r, ϕ
0
) = η
3
(r, θ, ϕ
0
) sin
2
θ.
b
For a corresponding class of solutions, see formulas (2), or (3).
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
8 S. I. Vacaru
For the limit η
3
→ 1 the solution of (13) is investigated in details in Ref. 4.
Here, we prove in a similar manner that we can deﬁne exact solutions for nontrivial
values of η
3
. The variables r and θ can be separated if we substitute
Q(r, θ, ϕ
0
) = Q
0
(r, ϕ
0
)C
−3/2
l+2
(θ) ,
where C
ν
n
are the Gegenbauer functions generated by the equation
¸
d
dθ
sin
2ν
θ
d
dθ
+n(n + 2ν) sin
2ν
θ
C
ν
n
(θ) = 0 .
The function C
−3/2
l+2
(θ) is related to the second derivative of the Legendre function
P
l
(θ) by formulas
C
−3/2
l+2
(θ) = sin
3
θ
d
dθ
¸
1
sinθ
dP
l
(θ)
dθ
.
The separated part of (13) which depends on radial variable with a ﬁxed value ϕ
0
,
transforms into
η
3/2
3
∆
d
dr
∆
r
4
η
3/2
3
dQ
0
dr
+
σ
2
−
µ
2
∆
r
4
Q
0
= 0 , (14)
where µ
2
= (l − 1)(l + 2) for l = 2, 3, . . . A further simpliﬁcation is possible for
η
3
= η
3
(r, ϕ
0
) if we introduce into (14) a new radial coordinate
r
#
=
η
3/2
3
(r, ϕ
0
)r
2
dr
and a new unknown function Z
(η)
= r
−1
Q
0
(r). The equation for Z
(η)
is a
Schrodinger like onedimensional wave equation
d
2
dr
2
#
+
σ
2
η
3/2
3
Z
(η)
= V
(η)
Z
(η)
(15)
with the potential
V
(η)
=
∆
r
5
η
3/2
3
¸
µ
2
−r
4
d
dr
∆
r
4
η
3/2
3
¸
(16)
and the polarized parameter
¯ σ
2
= σ
2
/η
3/2
3
.
This equation transforms into the socalled Regge–Wheeler equation if η
3
= 1.
For instance, for the Schwarzschild black hole such solutions are investigated and
tabulated for diﬀerent values of l = 2, 3 and 4 in Ref. 4.
We note that for static anisotropic black holes with nontrivial anisotropic con
formal factor, Ω = 1+ε, . . . , even η
3
may depend on angular variable θ. This is due
to the condition that φ(r, ϕ
0
) = η
3
(r, θ, ϕ
0
) sin
2
θ which allows (13) to transform
directly into (15) with µ = 0 without any separation of variables r and θ. It is not
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 9
necessary in this case to consider the Gegenbauer functions because Q
0
does not
depend on θ which corresponds to a solution with l = 1.
We may transform (15) into the usual form,
d
2
dr
2
+σ
2
Z
(η)
=
¯
V
(η)
Z
(η)
if we introduce the variable
r
=
dr
#
η
−3/2
3
(r
#
, ϕ
0
)
for
¯
V
(η)
= η
3/2
3
V
(η)
. So, the polarization function η
3
, describing static anholonomic
deformations of the Scharzshild black hole, “renormalizes” the potential in the
onedimensional Schrodinger waveequation governing axial perturbations of such
objects.
We conclude that small static “ellipsoid”like deformations and polarizations
of spherical black holes (the anisotropic conﬁgurations being described by generic
vacuum oﬀdiagonal metric ansatz) do not change the type of equations for axial
perturbations: one modiﬁes the potential barrier,
V
(−)
=
∆
r
5
[(µ
2
+ 2)r −6m] −→
¯
V
(η)
and redeﬁnes the radial variables
r
∗
= r + 2mln(r/2m−1) −→r
(ϕ
0
)
with a parametric dependence on anisotropic angular coordinate which is caused
by the existence of a deformed static horizon.
4. Polar Metric Perturbations
The polar perturbations are described by nontrivial increments of the diagonal
metric coeﬃcients, δµ
α
= δµ
(ε)
α
+δµ
(ς)
α
, for
µ
(ε)
α
= ν
α
+δµ
(ε)
α
where δµ
(ς)
α
(x
k
, t) parametrize time depending ﬂuctuations which are stated to be
the same for spherical and/or spheroid conﬁgurations and δµ
(ε)
α
is a static defor
mation from the spherical symmetry. Following notations (5) and (6) we write
e
v1
= r/
∆ , e
v2
= r , e
v3
= rh
3
sinθ , e
v4
= ∆/r
2
and
δµ
(ε)
1
= −
ε
2
(∆
−1
+r
2
φ) , δµ
(ε)
2
= δµ
(ε)
3
= −
ε
2
r
2
φ, δµ
(ε)
4
=
εη
2∆
where φ = 0 for the solutions with Ω = 1.
Examining the expressions for R
4i
, R
12
R
33
and G
11
(see the Appendix) we
conclude that the values Q
ij
appear quadratical which can be ignored in a linear
perturbation theory. Thus the equations for the axial and the polar perturbations
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
10 S. I. Vacaru
decouple. Considering only linearized expressions, both for static εterms and ﬂuc
tuations depending on time about the Schwarzschild values we obtain the equations
δ
1
(δµ
2
+δµ
3
) + (r
−1
−δ
1
µ
4
)(δµ
2
+δµ
3
) −2r
−1
δµ
1
= 0 (δR
41
= 0) ,
∂
2
(δµ
1
+δµ
3
) + (δµ
2
−δµ
3
) cot θ = 0 (δR
42
= 0) ,
∂
2
δ
1
(δµ
3
+δµ
4
) −δ
1
(δµ
2
−δµ
3
) cot θ
−(r
−1
−δ
1
µ
4
)∂
2
(δµ
4
) −(r
−1
+δ
1
µ
4
)∂
2
(δµ
1
) = 0 (δR
42
= 0) ,
e
2µ4
{2(r
−1
+δ
1
µ
4
)δ
1
(δµ
3
) +r
−1
δ
1
(δµ
3
+δµ
4
−δµ
1
+δµ
2
)
+δ
1
[δ
1
(δµ
3
)] −2r
−1
δµ
1
(r
−1
+ 2δ
1
µ
4
)}
−2e
−2µ4
∂
4
[∂
4
(δµ
3
)] +r
−2
{∂
2
[∂
2
(δµ
3
)]
+∂
2
(2δµ
3
+δµ
4
+δµ
1
−δµ
2
) cot θ + 2δµ
2
} = 0 (δR
33
= 0) ,
e
−2µ1
[r
−1
δ
1
(δµ
4
) + (r
−1
+δ
1
µ
4
)δ
1
(δµ
2
+δµ
3
)
−2r
−1
δµ
1
(r
−1
+ 2δ
1
µ
4
)] −e
−2µ4
∂
4
[∂
4
(δµ
3
+δµ
2
)]
+r
−2
{∂
2
[∂
2
(δµ
3
)] +∂
2
(2δµ
3
+δµ
4
−δµ
2
) cot θ+2δµ
2
} = 0 (δG
11
= 0) .
(17)
The values of type δµ
α
= δµ
(ε)
α
+ δµ
(ς)
α
from (17) contain two components: the
ﬁrst ones are static, proportional to ε, and the second ones may depend on time
coordinate t. We shall assume that the perturbations δµ
(ς)
α
have a timedependence
exp[σt] so that the partial time derivative “∂
4
” is replaced by the factor iσ. In order
to treat both type of increments in a similar fashion we may consider that the values
labeled with (ε) also oscillate in timelike exp[σ
(ε)
t] but with a very small (almost
zero) frequency σ
(ε)
→ 0. There are also actions of “elongated” partial derivative
operators like
δ
1
(δµ
α
) = ∂
1
(δµ
α
) −εn
1
∂
4
(δµ
α
) .
To avoid a calculus with complex values we associate the terms proportional to the
amplitude of type εin
1
∂
4
and write this operator as
δ
1
(δµ
α
) = ∂
1
(δµ
α
) +εn
1
σ(δµ
α
) .
For the “nonperturbed” Schwarzschild values, which are static, the operator δ
1
reduces to ∂
1
, i.e. δ
1
v
α
= ∂
1
v
α
. Hereafter we shall consider that the solution of
the system (17) to consist of a superposition of two linear solutions, δµ
α
= δµ
(ε)
α
+
δµ
(ς)
α
. The ﬁrst class of solutions for increments will be provided with index (ε),
corresponding to the frequence σ
(ε)
. The second class will be for the increments with
index (ς) and correspond to the frequence σ
(ς)
. We shall write this as δµ
(A)
α
and
σ
(A)
for the labels A = ε or ς and suppress the factors exp[σ
(A)
t] in our subsequent
considerations. The system of equations (17) will be considered for both type of
increments.
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 11
We can separate the variables by substitutions
4,7
δµ
(A)
1
= L
(A)
(r)P
l
(cos θ) ,
δµ
(A)
2
= [T
(A)
(r)P
l
(cos θ) +V
(A)
(r)∂
2
P
l
/∂θ
2
] ,
δµ
(A)
3
= [T
(A)
(r)P
l
(cos θ) +V
(A)
(r) cot θ∂P
l
/∂θ] ,
δµ
(A)
4
= N
(A)
(r)P
l
(cos θ)
(18)
and reduce the system of equations (17) to
δ
1
(N
(A)
−L
(A)
) = (r
−1
−∂
1
ν
4
)N
(A)
+ (r
−1
+∂
1
ν
4
)L
(A)
,
δ
1
L
(A)
+ (2r
−1
−∂
1
ν
4
)N
(A)
= −[δ
1
X
(A)
+ (r
−1
−∂
1
ν
4
)X
(A)
] ,
(19)
and
2r
−1
δ
1
(N
(A)
) −l(l + 1)r
−2
e
−2v4
N
(A)
−2r
−1
(r
−1
+ 2∂
1
ν
4
)L
(A)
−2(r
−1
+ ∂
1
ν
4
)δ
1
[N
(A)
+ (l −1)(l + 2)V
(A)
/2]
−(l −1)(l + 2)r
−2
e
−2v4
(V
(A)
−L
(A)
)
−2σ
2
(A)
e
−4v4
[L
(A)
+ (l −1)(l + 2)V
(A)
/2] = 0 , (20)
where we have introduced new functions
X
(A)
=
1
2
(l −1)(l + 2)V
(A)
and considered the relation
T
(A)
−V
(A)
+L
(A)
= 0 (δR
42
= 0) .
We can introduce the functions
¯
L
(A)
= L
(A)
+εσ
(A)
n
1
L
(A)
dr ,
¯
N
(A)
= N
(A)
+εσ
(A)
n
1
N
(A)
dr ,
¯
T
(A)
= N
(A)
+εσ
(A)
n
1
N
(A)
dr ,
¯
V
(A)
= V
(A)
+εσ
(A)
n
1
V
(A)
dr ,
(21)
for which
∂
1
¯
L
(A)
= δ
1
L
(A)
, ∂
1
¯
N
(A)
= δ
1
N
(A)
,
∂
1
¯
T
(A)
= δ
1
T
(A)
, ∂
1
¯
V
(A)
= δ
1
V
(A)
.
In this way, it is possible to substitute into (19) and (20) the elongated partial
derivative δ
1
by the usual one acting on “tilded” radial increments.
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
12 S. I. Vacaru
By straightforward calculations
4
one can check that the functions
Z
(+)
(A)
= r
2
6mX
(A)
/r(l −1)(l + 2) −L
(A)
r(l −1)(l + 2)/2 + 3m
satisfy onedimensional wave equations similar to (15) for Z
(η)
with η
3
= 1, when
r
= r
∗
,
d
2
dr
2
∗
+σ
2
(A)
¯
Z
(+)
(A)
= V
(+)
Z
(+)
(A)
,
¯
Z
(+)
(A)
= Z
(+)
(A)
+εσ
(A)
n
1
Z
(+)
(A)
dr ,
(22)
where
V
(+)
=
2∆
r
5
[r(l −1)(l + 2)/2 + 3m]
2
×
9m
2
¸
r
2
(l −1)(l + 2) +m
+
1
4
(l −1)
2
(l + 2)
2
r
3
¸
1 +
1
2
(l −1)(l + 2) +
3m
r
¸
. (23)
For ε →0, Eq. (22) transforms into the usual Zerilli equation.
4,11
To complete the solution we give the formulas for the “tilded” L, X and N
factors,
¯
L
(A)
=
3m
r
2
¯
Φ
(A)
−
(l −1)(l + 2)
2r
¯
Z
(+)
(A)
,
¯
X
(A)
=
(l −1)(l + 2)
2r
(
¯
Φ
(A)
+
¯
Z
(+)
(A)
) ,
¯
N
(A)
=
m−
m
2
+r
4
σ
2
(A)
r −2m
¯
Φ
(A)
r
2
−
(l −1)(l + 2)r
2(l −1)(l + 2) + 12m
∂
¯
Z
(+)
(A)
∂r
#
−
(l −1)(l + 2)
[r(l −1)(l + 2) + 6m]
2
×
12m
2
r
+ 3m(l −1)(l + 2) +
r
2
(l −1)(l + 2)[(l −1)(l + 2) + 2]
¸
,
(24)
where
¯
Φ
(A)
= (l −1)(l + 2)e
ν4
e
−ν4 ¯
Z
(+)
(A)
(l −1)(l + 2)r + 6m
dr .
Following the relations (21) we can compute the corresponding “untileded” values
and put them into (18) in oder to ﬁnd the increment of ﬂuctuation driven by (17).
For simplicity, we omit the rather cumbersome ﬁnal expressions.
The formulas (24) together with a solution of the wave equation (22) complete
the formal solutions for polar perturbations. Tabulated in Ref. 4 is the data for the
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 13
potential (23) for diﬀerent values of l and (l − 1)(l + 2)/2. In the anisotropic case
the explicit form of solutions is deformed by terms proportional to εn
1
σ. The static
ellipsoidallike deformations can be modeled by the formulas obtained in the limit
σ
(ε)
→0.
5. The Stability of Black Ellipsoids
The problem of the stability of anholonomically deformed Schwarzschild metrics,
due to external perturbation, is very important to be solved in order to under
stand if such static black ellipsoidlike objects may exist in general relativity. In
this context we address the question: Given any initial value for a static locally
anisotropic conﬁguration conﬁned to a ﬁnite interval of r
for axial perturbations,
and r
∗
for polar peturbations, will such perturbations remain bounded at all times
of evolution?
We have proved that even for anisotropic conﬁgurations every type of pertur
bations are governed by onedimensional wave equations of the form
d
2
Z
dρ
+σ
2
Z = V Z (25)
where ρ is a radial type coordinate. Z corresponds to Z
(η)
or Z
(+)
(A)
of smooth real,
potentials
¯
V
(η)
or V
(−)
independent of σ > 0 with bounded integrals, respectively.
For such equations a solution Z(ρ, σ, ϕ
0
) satisfying the boundary conditions
c
Z →e
iσρ
+R(σ)e
−iσρ
(ρ →+∞) ,
→T(σ)e
iσρ
(ρ →−∞)
provides there exists a basic complete set of wave functions which allows one to
obtain a stable evolution. For any initial perturbation that is smooth and conﬁned
to ﬁnite interval of ρ, we can introduce the integral
ψ(ρ, 0) = (2π)
−1/2
+∞
−∞
¯
ψ(σ, 0)Z(ρ, σ)dσ
and deﬁne, at later times, the evolution of perturbations,
ψ(ρ, t) = (2π)
−1/2
+∞
−∞
¯
ψ(σ, 0)e
iσt
Z(ρ, σ)dσ .
The Schrodinger theory garantees the condition
+∞
−∞
ψ(ρ, 0)
2
dρ =
+∞
−∞

¯
ψ(σ, 0)
2
dσ =
+∞
−∞
ψ(ρ, 0)
2
dρ ,
from which the boundedness of ψ(ρ, t) follows for all t > 0.
c
The ﬁrst expression corresponds to an incident wave of unit amplitude from +∞giving rise to a
reﬂected wave of amplitude R(σ) at +∞ and the second expression is for a transmitted wave of
amplitude T(σ) at −∞).
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
14 S. I. Vacaru
In our consideration we have replaced the time partial derivative ∂/∂t by iσ,
which was represented by the approximation of perturbations to be periodic like
e
iσt
. This is related to a timedepending variant of (25), such as
∂
2
Z
∂t
2
=
∂
2
Z
∂ρ
2
−V Z .
Multiplying this equation by ∂Z/∂t, where Z denotes the complex conjugation, and
integrating by parts, we obtain
+∞
−∞
∂Z
∂t
∂
2
Z
∂t
2
+
∂Z
∂ρ
∂
2
Z
∂t∂ρ
+V Z
∂Z
∂t
dρ = 0
which provides the condition of convergence. This equation added to its complex
conjugate will result in a constant energy integral,
+∞
−∞
∂Z
∂t
2
+
∂Z
∂ρ
2
+V Z
2
dρ = const ,
which bounds the expression ∂Z/∂t
2
and excludes an exponential growth of any
bounded solution of (25). We note that this property holds for every type of
“ellipsoidal”like deformation of the potential, V →V +εV
(1)
, with possible depen
dence on polarization as we considered in (16) and/or (23).
The general properties of the onedimensional Schrodinger equations obtained
via perturbations of holonomic and anholonomic solutions of the vacuum Einstein
equations allow us to conclude that there are locally anisotropic static conﬁguratios
which are stable under linear deformations.
In a similar manner we may analyze perturbations (axial or polar) governed by
a twodimensional Schrodinger wave equation
∂
2
Z
∂t
2
=
∂
2
Z
∂ρ
2
+A(ρ, ϕ, t)
∂
2
Z
∂ϕ
2
−V (ρ, ϕ, t)Z
for some smooth enough functions. The stability in this case is proven if there exists
an (energy) integral
π
0
+∞
−∞
∂Z
∂t
2
+
∂Z
∂ρ
2
+
A
∂Z
∂ρ
2
+V Z
2
dρdϕ = const
which bounds ∂Z/∂t
2
for twodimensional perturbations. For simplicity, we omit
ted such calculus in this work.
Finally, we note that we can also prove the stability of perturbations along
“anisotropic” directions of arbitrary anholonomic deformations of the Schwarzschild
solution which have nonspherical horizons and can be covered by a set of ﬁnite
regions approximated as small, ellipsoidlike, deformations of some spherical hyper
surfaces. We may analyze the geodesic congruence on every deformed subregion of
smooth enough function and proof the stability as we have done for the resolution
ellipsoid horizons. In general, we may consider horizons with nontrivial topology,
like vacuum black tori, or higher genus anisotropic conﬁgurations. This is not
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 15
prohibited by the principles of topological censorship
12
if we are dealing with oﬀ
diagonal metrics and the associated anholonomic frames.
1
The vacuum anholonomy
in such cases may be treated as an eﬀective matter which change the condition of
topological theorems.
6. Outlook and Conclusions
It is a remarkable fact that, in spite of having a complex appearance, the per
turbations of static oﬀdiagonal vacuum gravitational conﬁgurations are governed
by equations similar to those of the diagonal holonomic solutions. The origin of
this mystery is due to the fact that by anholonomic transforms we eﬀectively
diagonalized the oﬀdiagonal metrics by “elongating” some partial derivatives. In
this way the type of equations governing the perturbations is preserved but, for
small deformations, the systems of linear equations for ﬂuctuation became “slightly”
nondiagonal and with certain tetradic modiﬁcations of partial derivatives and dif
ferentials. In details, the question of relating of particular integrals of such systems
associated with systems of linear diﬀerential equations is investigated in Ref. 4. In
our case the same relations between the potentials
¯
V
(η)
and V
(−)
and wave func
tions Z
(η)
and Z
(+)
(A)
hold, the diﬀerence being that the physical values and formulas
are polarized by some anisotropy functions η
3
(r, θ, ϕ), Ω(r, ϕ), η(r, ϕ), w
1
(r, ϕ) and
n
1
(r, ϕ) and deformed on a small parameter ε.
We also observe that the “anisotropic” potentials
¯
V
(η)
and V
(−)
may be deﬁned
for such polarizations η
3
(r, θ, ϕ) as they are smooth functions, integrable over the
range of r
∗
, (−∞, +∞) and positive everywhere. For real σ, the anisotropic solu
tions, represent ingoing and outgoing waves of type e
±iσr∗
(r
∗
→±∞). We conclude
that the underlying physical problem is that of reﬂection and transmission of in
cident waves (from + or − ∞) in some anisotropically deformed onedimensional
potential barriers
¯
V
(η)
and/or V
(−)
, for every ﬁxed anisotropic angle ϕ
0
. Because
at distance far away from deformed horizons, the metrics of anisotropic black holes
transforms into the usual Schwarzschild solution we can prove the equality of the
reﬂection and the transmission coeﬃcients for the axial and the polar perturba
tions, even when the wave equations are anholonomically deformed. Such formulas
are tabulated in Ref. 4 and may be used for anisotropic solutions after some redeﬁ
nition of coeﬃcients. The general properties of onedimensional potentialscattering
are preserved for small anholonomic deformations; they are related to certain solu
tions of the onedimensional Schrodinger’s wave equations.
We emphasize that we proved the stability of black ellipsoids by ﬁxing an
anisotropic directions in the oﬀdiagonal metrics, ϕ = ϕ
0
i.e. under certain an
holonomic constraints imposed on the vacuum gravitational conﬁgurations. A more
general consideration with variable ϕ elevates the problem to the twodimensional
Schrodinger’s potentialscattering problem, as well to an anholonomic Newman–
Penrose formalism which makes the solution more sophisticate. Nevertheless, we
have strong reasons to believe that the stability of anisotropic static solutions proved
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
16 S. I. Vacaru
in the parametric approximation ϕ = ϕ
0
will hold at least for spelling polarizations
which model twodimensional scattering eﬀects containing certain onedimensional
stable Schrodinger’s potentials. The onedimensional perturbation analysis is the
ﬁrst, very important, step in investigating the stability of any physical system; it
should be included into the higher dimensional and/or less constrained approaches.
We found that the functions Z
(−)
and Z
(+)
and their anisotropic extensions Z
(η)
and Z
(+)
(A)
do in fact satisfy very similar onedimensional wave equations stems from
the fact that some deep properties of static solutions of the Einstein equations
which hold both for the diagonal and the oﬀdiagonal staticstationary vacuum
and/or electrovacuum metrics.
Finally, we conclude that there are static black ellipsoid vacuum conﬁgura
tions which are stable with respect to onedimensional perturbations, axial and/or
polar ones, governed by solutions of the corresponding onedimensional Schrodinger
equations. The problem of stability of such objects with respect to two, or three
dimensional perturbations, and the possibility of modeling such perturbations in
the framework of a two, or threedimensional inverse scattering problem is the next
topic in our investigations.
Acknowledgments
The work is supported by a NATO/Portugal fellowship at CENTRA, the Instituto
Superior Tecnico, Lisbon.
Appendix
We compute the coeﬃcients of the curvature tensor as
R
α
βγτ
= δ
γ
Γ
α
βτ
−δ
τ
Γ
α
βγ
+ Γ
α
σγ
Γ
σ
βτ
−Γ
α
στ
Γ
σ
βγ
,
of the Ricci tensor as
R
α
βγα
= R
βγ
and of the Einstein tensor as
G
βγ
= R
βγ
−
1
2
g
βγ
R
for R = g
βγ
R
βγ
and δ
γ
= ∂
γ
(γ = 2, 3, 4) and δ
1
= ∂
1
− n
1
∂/∂t. Straightforward
computations of the quadratic line element (4) give
R
11
= −e
−2µ1
[δ
2
11
(µ
3
+µ
4
+µ
2
) +δ
1
µ
3
δ
1
(µ
3
−µ
1
)
+δ
1
µ
2
δ
1
(µ
2
−µ
1
) +δ
1
µ
4
δ
1
(µ
4
−µ
1
)]
−e
−2µ2
[∂
2
22
µ
1
+∂
2
µ
1
∂
2
(µ
3
+µ
4
+µ
1
−µ
2
)]
+e
−2µ4
[∂
2
44
µ
1
+∂
4
µ
1
∂
4
(µ
3
−µ
4
+µ
1
+µ
2
)]
−
1
2
e
2(µ3−µ1)
[e
−2µ2
Q
2
12
+e
−2µ4
Q
2
14
] ,
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
Perturbations and Stability of Black Ellipsoids 17
R
12
= −e
−µ1−µ2
[∂
2
δ
1
(µ
3
+µ
2
) −∂
2
µ
1
δ
1
(µ
3
+µ
1
) −δ
1
µ
2
∂
4
(µ
3
+µ
1
)
+δ
1
µ
3
∂
2
µ
3
+δ
1
µ
4
∂
2
µ
4
] +
1
2
e
2µ3−2µ4−µ1−µ2
Q
14
Q
24
,
R
31
= −
1
2
e
2µ3−µ4−µ2
[∂
2
(e
3µ3+µ4−µ1−µ2
Q
21
) +∂
4
(e
3µ3−µ4+µ2−µ1
Q
41
)] ,
R
33
= −e
−2µ1
[δ
2
11
µ
3
+δ
1
µ
3
δ
1
(µ
3
+µ
4
+µ
2
−µ
1
)]
−e
−2µ2
[∂
2
22
µ
3
+∂
2
µ
3
∂
2
(µ
3
+ µ
4
−µ
2
+µ
1
)]
+
1
2
e
2(µ3−µ1−µ2)
Q
2
12
+e
−2µ4
[∂
2
44
µ
3
+∂
4
µ
3
∂
4
(µ
3
−µ
4
+µ
2
+µ
1
)]
−
1
2
e
2(µ3−µ4)
[e
−2µ2
Q
2
24
+ e
−2µ1
Q
2
14
] ,
R
41
= −e
−µ1−µ4
[∂
4
δ
1
(µ
3
+µ
2
) +δ
1
µ
3
∂
4
(µ
3
−µ
1
)
+δ
1
µ
2
∂
4
(µ
2
−µ
1
) −δ
1
µ
4
∂
4
(µ
3
+µ
2
)]
+
1
2
e
2µ3−µ4−µ1−2µ2
Q
12
Q
34
,
R
43
= −
1
2
e
2µ3−µ1−µ2
[δ
1
(e
3µ3−µ4−µ1+µ2
Q
14
) +∂
2
(e
3µ3−µ4+µ1−µ2
Q
24
)] ,
R
44
= −e
−2µ4
[∂
2
44
(µ
1
+µ
2
+µ
3
) +∂
4
µ
3
∂
4
(µ
3
−µ
4
)
+∂
4
µ
1
∂
4
(µ
1
−µ
4
) +∂
4
µ
2
∂
4
(µ
2
−µ
4
)]
+e
−2µ1
[δ
2
11
µ
4
+δ
1
µ
4
δ
1
(µ
3
+µ
4
−µ
1
+µ
2
)]
+e
−2µ2
[∂
2
22
µ
4
+∂
2
µ
4
∂
2
(µ
3
+ µ
4
−µ
1
+µ
2
)]
−
1
2
e
2(µ3−µ4)
[e
−2µ1
Q
2
14
+ e
−2µ2
Q
2
24
] ,
where the rest of coeﬃcients are deﬁned by similar formulas with a corresponding
change of indices and partial derivative operators. R
22
, R
42
and R
32
are similarly
R
11
, R
41
and R
31
a change in the index 1 →2. The values Q
ij
and Q
i4
are deﬁned
respectively by
Q
ij
= δ
j
q
i
−δ
i
q
j
and Q
i4
= ∂
4
q
i
−δ
i
ω .
The nontrivial coeﬃcients of the Einstein tensors are
G
11
= e
−2µ2
[∂
2
22
(µ
3
+µ
4
) +∂
2
(µ
3
+µ
4
)∂
2
(µ
4
−µ
2
) +∂
2
µ
3
∂
2
µ
3
]
−e
−2µ4
[∂
2
44
(µ
3
+µ
2
) +∂
4
(µ
3
+ µ
2
)∂
4
(µ
2
−µ
4
) +∂
4
µ
3
∂
4
µ
3
]
+e
−2µ1
[δ
1
µ
4
+δ
1
(µ
3
+µ
2
) +δ
1
µ
3
δ
1
µ
2
]
−
1
4
e
2µ3
[e
−2(µ1+µ2)
Q
2
12
−e
−2(µ1+µ4)
Q
2
14
+e
−2(µ2+µ3)
Q
2
24
] ,
November 6, 2002 11:16 WSPC/142IJMPD 00273
18 S. I. Vacaru
G
33
= e
−2µ1
[δ
2
11
(µ
4
+µ
2
) +δ
1
µ
4
δ
1
(µ
4
−µ
1
+µ
2
) +δ
1
µ
2
δ
1
(µ
2
−µ
1
)]
+e
−2µ2
[∂
2
22
(µ
4
+µ
1
) +∂
2
(µ
4
−µ
2
+µ
1
) +∂
2
µ
1
∂
2
(µ
1
−µ
2
)]
−e
−2µ4
[∂
2
44
(µ
1
+µ
2
) +∂
4
µ
1
∂
4
(µ
1
−µ
4
) +∂
4
µ
2
∂
4
(µ
2
−µ
4
) +∂
4
µ
1
∂
4
µ
2
]
+
3
4
e
2µ3
[e
−2(µ1+µ2)
Q
2
12
−e
−2(µ1+µ4)
Q
2
14
−e
−2(µ2+µ3)
Q
2
24
] ,
G
44
= e
−2µ1
[δ
2
11
(µ
3
+µ
2
) +δ
1
µ
3
δ
1
(µ
3
−µ
1
+µ
2
) +δ
1
µ
2
δ
1
(µ
2
−µ
1
)]
−e
−2µ2
[∂
2
22
(µ
3
+µ
1
) +∂
2
(µ
3
−µ
2
+µ
1
) +∂
2
µ
1
∂
2
(µ
1
−µ
2
)]
−
1
4
e
2(µ3−µ1−µ2)
Q
2
12
+e
−2µ4
[∂
4
µ
3
∂
4
(µ
1
+µ
2
) +∂
4
µ
1
∂
4
µ
2
]
−
1
4
e
2(µ3−µ4)
[e
−2µ1
Q
2
14
−e
−2µ2
Q
2
24
] .
The component G
22
is to be found from G
11
by changing the index 1 →2.
References
1. S. Vacaru, grqc/ 0001020; J. High Energy Phys. 0104 009 (2001); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
290, 83 (2001); S. Vacaru, “A new method of constructing black hole solutions in
Einstein and 5D dimension gravity,” hepth/0110250; “Black tori solutions in Einstein
and 5D gravity,” hepth/0110284.
2. S. Vacaru, “Horizons and geodesics of black ellipsoids,” grqc/0206014
3. S. Vacaru, “Horizons and geodesics of black ellipsoids with conformal anisotropic
symmetries,” grqc/0206015.
4. S. Chandrasekhar, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford University Press,
1992).
5. T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 108, 1063 (1957).
6. C. V. Vishveshwara, Phys. Rev. D1, 2870 (1970); J. M. Bardeen and W. H. Press,
J. Math. Phys. 14, 7 (1972); S. Chandreasekhar, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A343,
289 (1975); B. C. Xanthopoulos, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A378, 61 (1981).
7. J. L. Friedman, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A335, 163 (1973).
8. P. Deift and E. Trubowitz, Commun. Pure and Appl. Math. 32, 121 (1979).
9. L. D. Faddeev, Soviet. Phys. Dokl. 3, 747 (1958); R. M. Miura, C. S. Gardner and
M. D. Kruskal, J. Math. Phys. 9 1204 (1968).
10. V. Moncrief, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 323 (1973); R. M. Wald, J. Math. Phys. 20, 1056
(1979).
11. F. J. Zerilli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 2141 (1970).
12. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 25, 152 (1972); G. J. Galloway, K. Seheich,
D. M. Witt and E. Woolgar, Phys. Rev. D60, 104039 (1999).