0 views

Uploaded by torque HOLDINGS

- ACF_G7_SecC
- What is a P value
- 1984_Brokensha_A Trail to Compare
- The Binomial Distribution
- 101 ExaminationSS
- Actuaries Syllabus
- SAS enterprise guide
- Research Paper on an Empirical Assessment of Smart Phone Usage Amongst Students
- JM
- Appendix
- 05_abstract.pdf
- Hsern Ern's UCS Exam Revision Notes
- Identify Distribution of Data
- The Way We Work in Class
- Chapter IV With Graphhhhhhhh
- P-value
- 882-2095-1-SM
- Factors Influencing Lifestyle Characteristic of Investor Based on Interest
- Exam3
- comj%2E2007%2E31%2E1%2E68

You are on page 1of 20

Male 100

Gender

Female 0

Graduate 1

Higher secondary 8

Qualification Secondary 30

Primary 42

Illiterate 19

Below 10000 46

10000 – 25000 48 100

Income 25001 – 40000 2

40001 – 60000 3

Above 60000 1

18 to 30 years 8

31 to 40 years 20

Age 41 to 50 years 32

51 to 60 years 3

Above 60 years 3

Below 5 Year 12

Experience of 5 – 10 years 12

driving rickshaw 10 – 15 years 28

Above 15 years 48

100

Below 5 Year 9

Experience of 5 – 10 years 15

Owning rickshaw 10 – 15 years 29

Above 15 years 47

1–5 92

Number of

5 – 10 4

rickshaw own 100

10 – 15 2

Above 15 2

1 – 50 km 1

How much do you 50 – 100 km 1

drive during one 100 – 150 km 8 95

day 150 – 200 km 39

Above 200 km 46

Have you heard I have not heard about it 16

about solar e- I have heard bit about it 67 100

rickshaw I have heard a lot about it 17

Have you ever No, I have not 21

seen solar e- Yes, I have 75

rickshaw in real life Don’t remember 4

If you have heard about solar e rickshaw, then how much do you agree

with following statement

SA A N DA SDA Total

A solar e-rickshaw is more reliable 28 36 11 6 4 85

A solar e-rickshaw accelerates slower 29 26 22 4 4

performance and pickup

Gas prices are not high enough to justify 10 28 37 8 2

buying a solar e-rickshaw

Chart Title

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

A solar e- A solar e- A solar e- Solar e- Solar e- Solar e- Gas prices are

rickshaw is rickshaw rickshaw rickshaws rickshaws are rickshaw not high

more reliable accelerates emits less have unique much cheaper doesn’t offer enough to

slower pollution features to own enough justify buying

performance a solar e-

and pickup rickshaw

SA A N DA SDA

ant factor

Predomin

Not at all

A Little

Some

Total

what

A lot

Purchase price 4 5 13 54 24

Mileage 0 9 21 33 37

Maintenance Cost 0 5 33 31 31

Resell Value 2 6 43 24 25

Speed 0 4 17 51 28

Pollution 14 15 20 34 17

Power/Pickup 0 5 12 39 44

Manufacturer Advertisement 3 26 52 15 4

Proximity of dealership for service 20 23 30 16 11

Chart Title

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

The most preferred alternative 0 48 52

100

Willingness to purchase 0 72 28

Chart Title

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Petrol Gas Solar E-rickshaw

Predominant

Some what

Not at all

A Little

factor

Total

A lot

Realizing a solar electric rickshaw could cut 2 5 11 39 43 100

pollution significantly

Realizing a solar electric rickshaw could save 0 6 16 34 44

me significantly in monthly fuel costs

Getting a tax benefit and subsidy for 0 8 6 22 64

purchasing a solar e-rickshaw.

Having a 10-year/ 250,000 km solar electric 1 10 29 40 20

rickshaw battery warranty.

Having recharging facilities at home, so that I 0 13 32 36 19

could recharge easily overnight.

Owning a solar electric rickshaw would make 4 14 34 30 18

a statement regarding my strong

environmental values.

Owning a solar electric rickshaw would make 7 21 39 18 15

it clear to others that I am on the forefront of

new technology

Some what

Not at all

Prevent

A Little

Buying

Total

A lot

the battery.

Low pick up and power of solar e-rickshaw 2 1 22 45 30

after full charging

Loading capacity of solar electric rickshaw 5 18 50 19 8

Difficulties in getting the Solar Electric 6 21 49 14 10

Rickshaw serviced or repaired.

before it has to be charged again. What is the least number of miles that

it has to be able to drive on one battery for you to consider buying an

electric rickshaw?

Percent

Would you be interested in buying a solar electric rickshaw within the next 2 years?

Percent

4 5 5.0 5.0 58.0

Total 100 100.0 100.0

Analysis Case Processing Summary

Valid 85 85.0

Missing or out-of-range 0 .0

group codes

At least one missing 15 15.0

discriminating variable

Excluded Both missing or out-of-range 0 .0

group codes and at least

one missing discriminating

variable

Total 15 15.0

Total 100 100.0

Group Statistics

Deviation Unweighted Weighted

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw 1.28 .560 39 39.000

SER have unique features that stand out from 2.21 .833 39 39.000

gasoline counterparts

Gas SER are much cheaper to own in the long run 1.72 1.099 39 39.000

than gasoline rickshaws

pickup

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a 2.67 .955 39 39.000

solar electric rickshaw

SER is more reliable than current rickshaw 1.85 .894 46 46.000

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw 2.35 1.140 46 46.000

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw 1.28 .720 46 46.000

SER have unique features that stand out from 2.07 .854 46 46.000

gasoline counterparts

Solar E

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run 1.50 .837 46 46.000

rickshaw

than gasoline rickshaws

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and 2.11 .948 46 46.000

pickup

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a 2.50 .863 46 46.000

solar electric rickshaw

Total SER is more reliable than current rickshaw 2.08 1.082 85 85.000

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw 2.15 1.097 85 85.000

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw 1.28 .648 85 85.000

SER have unique features that stand out from 2.13 .842 85 85.000

gasoline counterparts

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run 1.60 .966 85 85.000

than gasoline rickshaws

pickup

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a 2.58 .905 85 85.000

solar electric rickshaw

Lambda

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw .962 3.251 1 83 .075

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw 1.000 .000 1 83 .997

SER have unique features that stand out from gasoline .993 .580 1 83 .449

counterparts

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run than gasoline .987 1.075 1 83 .303

rickshaws

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup .998 .156 1 83 .694

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a solar electric .991 .714 1 83 .401

rickshaw

ANOVA’s, carried out for each independent variable, are presented. Here, only

“SER is more reliable than current rickshaw” (variable motive) differ (Sig. =

0.029) for the two groups (Gas and Solar E-rickshaw).

Log Determinants

Determinant

Gas 7 -3.114

Solar E rickshaw 7 -3.310

Pooled within-groups 7 -2.340

The ranks and natural logarithms of determinants

printed are those of the group covariance matrices.

Test Results

Box's M 73.041

Approx. 2.371

df1 28

F

df2 22660.861

Sig. .000

population covariance matrices.

The significance value of 0.000 indicates that the data is differ significantly

from multivariate normal.

Eigenvalues

Correlation

less than the number of groups defined by the dependent variable and the

number of independent variables. In this analysis there were 2 groups defined

by preferred option and 7 independent variables, so the maximum possible

number of discriminant functions was 1.

within group sums of squares. Large Eigenvalues imply superior functions.

canonical correlation of 0.321 suggests the model explains 10.30% (i.e.0.3212

×100) of the variation in the grouping variable.

An eigenvalue indicates the proportion of variance explained. (Between-groups

sums of squares divided by within-groups sums of squares). A large eigenvalue

is associated with a strong function. The canonical relation is a correlation

between the discriminant scores and the levels of the dependent variable. A

high correlation indicates a function that discriminates well. The present

correlation of 0.321 is low (1.00 is perfect).

Wilks' Lambda

H1 : There may be a significant discriminating power in the variables.

So reject the alternative hypothesis H1 and accept the null hypothesis, so there

is no significant discriminating power in variable

Wilks‘ λ for each predictor is the ratio of the within group sum of squares to the

total sum of squares. Its value varies between 0 and 1.

Large values of λ (near 1) indicate that group means do not seem to be different.

Small values of λ (near 0) indicate that the group means seem to be different.

So here value of wilks’ lambda is 0.891 which is higher value so it can be

interpreted that the group means do not seems to be different.

The significance of the discriminant function is indicated by Wilks’ lambda and

provides the proportion of total variability not explained, i.e. it is the converse of

the squared canonical correlation.

A lambda of 1.00 occurs when observed group means are equal (all the

variance is explained by factors other than difference between those means),

while a small lambda occurs when within-groups variability is small compared

to the total variability. A small lambda indicates that group means appear to

differ. The associated significance value indicates whether the difference is

significant. Here, the Lambda of 0.897 has a significant value (Sig. = 0.280);

thus, the group means not appear to differ.

In the table of Wilks' Lambda which tested functions for statistical significance,

the direct analysis identified 1 discriminant functions that were statistically

significant. The Wilks' lambda statistic for the test of function 1 (chi-

square=8.367) had a probability of 0.280 which was more than the level of

significance of 0.05. The significance of the maximum possible number of

discriminant functions doesn’t supports the interpretation of a solution using 1

discriminant function.

Function

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw -.593

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw -.294

SER have unique features that stand out from gasoline counterparts .247

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run than gasoline rickshaws .415

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup -.242

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a solar electric rickshaw .039

There are 7 independent (predictor) variables. Now how to decide which of

these is a better predictor of a preferred option of gas or solar e rickshaw. To

answer this, look at the standardized coefficients in Table of the output

This output shows that SER is accelerating slower than my current rickshaw is

the best predictor, with coefficient of -0.593 followed by SER is more reliable

than current rickshaw of 0.572. The absolute value of the standardized

coefficient of each variable indicates its relative importance.

Structure Matrix

Function

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw -.584

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run than gasoline rickshaws .336

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a solar electric rickshaw .274

SER have unique features that stand out from gasoline counterparts .247

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup -.128

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw -.001

canonical discriminant functions

Variables ordered by absolute size of correlation within function.

Function

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw -.548

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw -.451

SER have unique features that stand out from gasoline counterparts .293

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run than gasoline rickshaws .429

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup -.250

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a solar electric rickshaw .043

(Constant) -.270

Unstandardized coefficients

scores concerning the independent variables. It is the list of coefficients of the

unstandardized discriminant equation. Each subject’s discriminant score would

be computed by entering his or her variable values (raw data) for each of the

variables in the equation.

1

Gas .364

Solar E rickshaw -.308

Unstandardized canonical

discriminant functions evaluated at

group means

Classification Statistics

Processed 100

Missing or out-of-range 0

group codes

Excluded

At least one missing 15

discriminating variable

Used in Output 85

Classification Resultsa

Most preferred option Gas Solar E

rickshaw

Gas 24 15 39

Count

Solar E rickshaw 18 28 46

Original

Gas 61.5 38.5 100.0

%

Solar E rickshaw 39.1 60.9 100.0

classify 61.2% of the 85 cases correctly. This figure is in the ‘% correct’ column

of the classification matrix. More specifically, it also says that out of 39 cases

predicted to choose most preferred option gas, 24 were observed to choose

most preferred option as gas. Similarly, from the column 2, we understand that

out of 46 cases predicted to choose solar e rickshaw as a preferred option, only

28 was found to choose solar e rickshaw as most preferred option. Thus, on a

whole 33 case out of 85 was mis-classified by the discriminant model, this gives

us a classification (or predictable) accuracy level of (85-33)/85 or 61.2%. This

level of accuracy may not hold for all future classifications of new cases. But it

is still a pointer towards the model being a good one, assuming the input data

was relevant and scientifically collected.

Valid 85 85.0

Missing or out-of-range 0 .0

group codes

At least one missing 15 15.0

discriminating variable

Excluded Both missing or out-of-range 0 .0

group codes and at least

one missing discriminating

variable

Total 15 15.0

Total 100 100.0

Group Statistics

Deviation Unweighted Weighted

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw 1.30 .696 60 60.000

SER have unique features that stand out from 2.15 .755 60 60.000

gasoline counterparts

Gas SER are much cheaper to own in the long run 1.60 1.012 60 60.000

than gasoline rickshaws

pickup

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a 2.65 .899 60 60.000

solar electric rickshaw

Solar E SER is more reliable than current rickshaw 1.68 .852 25 25.000

rickshaw SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw 2.52 1.358 25 25.000

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw 1.24 .523 25 25.000

SER have unique features that stand out from 2.08 1.038 25 25.000

gasoline counterparts

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run 1.60 .866 25 25.000

than gasoline rickshaws

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and 2.32 1.180 25 25.000

pickup

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a 2.40 .913 25 25.000

solar electric rickshaw

SER is more reliable than current rickshaw 2.08 1.082 85 85.000

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw 1.28 .648 85 85.000

SER have unique features that stand out from 2.13 .842 85 85.000

gasoline counterparts

Total SER are much cheaper to own in the long run 1.60 .966 85 85.000

than gasoline rickshaws

pickup

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a 2.58 .905 85 85.000

solar electric rickshaw

Lambda

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw .953 4.115 1 83 .046

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw .998 .150 1 83 .700

SER have unique features that stand out from .999 .121 1 83 .729

gasoline counterparts

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run than 1.000 .000 1 83 1.000

gasoline rickshaws

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup .972 2.426 1 83 .123

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a .984 1.353 1 83 .248

solar electric rickshaw

Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matrices

Log Determinants

Determinant

Gas 7 -3.223

Solar E rickshaw 7 -2.926

Pooled within-groups 7 -2.371

are those of the group covariance matrices.

Test Results

Box's M 63.533

Approx. 2.001

df1 28

F

df2 7897.543

Sig. .001

population covariance matrices.

Eigenvalues

Correlation

The Eigen values are related to the canonical correlations and describe how best

discriminating ability, the functions possess. The % of variances is the discriminating

ability of the 2 groups. Since there is only one function, 100% of the variance is

accounted by this function. The cumulative % of the variance gives the current and

proceeding cumulative total of the variance. As mentioned above, as there is only one

function in the present research we have 100% of the cumulative variance.

The Eigen value gives the proportion of variance explained. A larger Eigenvalue

explains a strong function. The canonical relation is a correlation between the

discriminant scores and the levels of these dependent variables. The higher the

correlations value, the better the function that discriminates the values. 1 is considered

as perfect. Here, we have the correlation of 0.362 is comparatively low.

canonical correlation of 0.362 suggests the model explains 13.10% (i.e.0.3622 ×100) of

the variation in the grouping variable.

H1 : There may be a significant discriminating power in the variables.

Wilks' Lambda

Rule: accept Null Hypothesis H0 and reject Alternate Hypothesis H1 Here 0.000 <

0.05, therefore we accept null Hypothesis H0 and reject alternate Hypothesis H1 and

conclude that based on the sample data, there is not statistically significant

discriminating power in the variables included in the model.

The Wilks Lambda is one of the multivariate statistics calculated by SPSS. The lower

the value of Wilks' Lambda, the better. In the present case the value is 0.869. The

Chi-square is 11.154 with 7 degrees of freedom, which is based on the groups present

in the categorical variables. A Wilks Lambda of 1.00 is when the observed group

means are equal, while a small Wilks Lambda is small when the within-groups

variability is small compared to the total variability. This indicates that the group

means appear to differ. Here higher Wilks' Lambda indicate that the group means is

not appear to differ.

Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

Functio

n

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw -.332

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw -.050

SER have unique features that stand out from gasoline counterparts .103

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run than gasoline rickshaws -.173

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup -.511

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a solar electric rickshaw .418

discriminant score. The score is calculated as a predicted value from the linear

regression using the above standardized coefficients and the standarised variables.

This output shows that SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup is the best

predictor, with coefficient of -0.511 followed by SER is more reliable than current

rickshaw of 0.6902. The absolute value of the standardized coefficient of each

variable indicates its relative importance

Structure Matrix

Function

SER is accelerating slower than current rickshaw -.574

SER doesn’t offer enough performance and pickup -.441

Gas prices are not high enough to justify buying a solar electric rickshaw .329

SER does less pollution than current rickshaw .110

SER have unique features that stand out from gasoline counterparts .098

SER are much cheaper to own in the long run than gasoline rickshaws .000

canonical discriminant functions

Variables ordered by absolute size of correlation within function.

1

Gas .248

Solar E rickshaw -.594

functions evaluated at group means

Classification Statistics

Processed 100

Missing or out-of-range 0

group codes

Excluded

At least one missing 15

discriminating variable

Used in Output 85

Unweighted Weighted

Solar E rickshaw .500 25 25.000

Total 1.000 85 85.000

It has been observed that 69.4% of data was correctly classified as willingness

to purchase gas and solar e rickshaw by the discriminant function. It has also

been noticed that out of the 60 responses, 42 have been correctly classified as

willingness to purchase gas option. And 18 responses are wrongly classified as

willingness to purchase solar e rickshaw. Out of the 25-solar e rickshaw option,

17 responses have been correctly classified as willingness to purchase solar e

rickshaw whereas 8 responses have been wrongly classified as willingness to

purchase gas option.

- ACF_G7_SecCUploaded byJayesh Purohit
- What is a P valueUploaded byTransportasi Masal
- 1984_Brokensha_A Trail to CompareUploaded byTeguh Nugraha Kusnan
- The Binomial DistributionUploaded byKit Meng Lim
- 101 ExaminationSSUploaded byaryan4ever05
- Actuaries SyllabusUploaded byAvani
- SAS enterprise guideUploaded byAndrew Reeves
- Research Paper on an Empirical Assessment of Smart Phone Usage Amongst StudentsUploaded byShwetang Panchal
- JMUploaded byAzrin Mila
- AppendixUploaded byElaine Briosos
- 05_abstract.pdfUploaded bymohan ks
- Hsern Ern's UCS Exam Revision NotesUploaded byNanthida Ang
- Identify Distribution of DataUploaded byYoubarajsharma
- The Way We Work in ClassUploaded byKairatTM
- Chapter IV With GraphhhhhhhhUploaded byadam molina
- P-valueUploaded byasdf0288
- 882-2095-1-SMUploaded byTanzeel Ur Rehman
- Factors Influencing Lifestyle Characteristic of Investor Based on InterestUploaded byannamyem
- Exam3Uploaded byakshay patri
- comj%2E2007%2E31%2E1%2E68Uploaded byMartin Ozvold
- Corrected Sampling VariogramUploaded byZhirokh RM
- 5medwincontreras outline1 2Uploaded byapi-372812719
- Inferential Statistics in Psychology3.docxUploaded byMihaela Filip
- Inferences on Two-Way Contingency TablesUploaded byHarley Garcia
- Statistics FormulasUploaded bycem9066
- Towards an optimal sampling strategy for assessing genetic variation within and among white clover (Trifolium repens L.) cultivars using AFLPUploaded bymehdi
- Presentation 1.5.pptxUploaded byKucing Berbulu Belang Belang
- bai tap toan kinh teUploaded bytranthevut
- Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing Part 1Uploaded byJesse M. Massie
- 4 Role of Statistics in ResearchUploaded byKong Tzeh Fung

- A Study on Work-Life Balance of Auto Rickshaw Drivers in MumbaiUploaded byInternational Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR)
- 43Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- nikunj-1-1Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- CP SEM 4 DOC.docxUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- Food Processing September 2015 GujaratUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- PACIS EcommerceUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- 2582Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- BECG 10 Marks.pptxUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- analiza discriminantaUploaded byBodnaras Adrian
- 2012 Jabeen Olaru Smith Braunl SpeidelUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- D760F86A-CD4C-4F5A-9C4E-7FBCC0D11AB8Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- 750_PBM_Summer 2018_Sem IV_Case Study and 10 Marks AssignmentUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- Capturing Consumer Preferences as Requirements for Software Product Lines _ SpringerLinkUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- nikunj-1-1Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- 1.1_BasicsUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- BECG 10marksUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- CB_CEC Presentation TopicsUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- ppr 3Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- SMUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- QuestionairUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- Top Lic (1)Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- Chap 007Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- compare (1)Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- LAB 2Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- India's Integrated Energy PolicyUploaded byBhupal Singh
- 011-ICSSH 2012-S00010Uploaded byAsim Khan
- 26010020Uploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- GCSR SEM 4 _PresentationUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS
- Gujarat Agriculture 11th PlanUploaded bytorque HOLDINGS

- 2018 SYLLABUS POL & PIL-ATTY. SANDOVAL.pdfUploaded byAnonymous tS1AFjzYsI
- Hemera TechnologiesUploaded byFong Yëè Jëê
- civil rights web-questUploaded byapi-367833271
- word employee handbookUploaded byapi-252036638
- stereotypes affects on child development-3Uploaded byapi-317501645
- Social Justice Through LiteratureUploaded byshay68
- Positive Law vs Natural Law Theory 1Uploaded byarmsarivu
- Change Making: How we adopt new attitudes, beliefs and practicesUploaded byOxfam
- Frostburg State University Obama Administration Letter Regarding Sexual HarassmentUploaded byThePoliticalHat
- social construction of sexualityUploaded byapi-340926637
- The Monstrosity of PrejudiceUploaded byIzzy Verdier
- Prototype Theory and Prejudice (Cognitive)Uploaded byHan-jun Yoon
- K answers (1).docUploaded byMark McGovern
- The Needs of Gender-Variant Children and Their ParentsUploaded byRochi Bauzá
- Development and Social DiversityUploaded byOxfam
- Review of the LiteratureUploaded byJavier Sebastián Della Mea
- Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005)Uploaded byLegal Momentum
- Escala sUploaded byHarlem AlienAqtor
- pojman-moral-objectivism.pdfUploaded byFrankyLim
- The Elephant Vanishes AnalysisUploaded byDavid
- Houphouet-Boigny - Black Africa and the French UnionUploaded bytj_sharp9645
- Violating Children's Rights: Harmful practices based on tradition, culture, religion or superstitionUploaded byMarsh Law Firm PLLC
- 01.Philippine Association of Service Exporters, Inc. v. DrilonUploaded byJulius Geoffrey Tangonan
- Migrant Crisis in KeralaUploaded bysivaramanlb
- life history reportUploaded byapi-283952162
- MCAT Review- Social SciencesUploaded byAmisha Vastani
- Ordinance 10558-2007Uploaded byCdeoCityCouncil
- Kittitas Superior Court Judge Election Candidates Chief Prosecutor Paul Sander Judge Frances Chmelewski and Jim DenisonUploaded bylleclezio9882
- Gender Based Stratification in Nepali SocietyUploaded bySantosh Thapa Magar
- Cunaj NeidaUploaded byAdv Bhavik A Solanki