© All Rights Reserved

7 views

© All Rights Reserved

- TN-HU-Muszaki Segedlet DT-013 Pre-Design of Gabion and TerraMesh ENG Rev00 July2013
- Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied Building on Sloping Ground Using Sap 2000-18262
- Combined Analysis of Rdd Scenarios for Levee Design
- Slide 1
- A Simple Method to Analyze Infiltration Into Unsaturated Soil Slopes
- 2
- SLOPE_W
- 103-2libromecanicadesuelosyfundacionesnhi
- Lecture28_2.pdf
- SlopeW 2007 Engineering Book
- SLOPEW 2007 Engineering Book
- soilnailingdesignnew
- Analysis of the Rock Slope Mehdi Zamani 2008
- Slope Paper 114
- Railway 2000 by Terry Clark
- 10.1016@0148-90629292449-M
- 2
- Slope Stability.pdf
- Ground Anchors
- Ecuación de Broms

You are on page 1of 8

1400, 633 - 6th Ave SW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2P 2Y5

Main: +1 403 269 2002 | Fax: +1 403 266 4851

Introduction

Soil nailing is a construction technique used for earth reinforcement. Nails can be used as a remedial

measure for natural slopes or to allow for over-steepening of new or existing slopes. Soil nails are

usually installed in a top-down procedure much like anchors and are typically grouted into place. Unlike

anchors, however, soil nails are usually not pre-stressed. This example illustrates the use of soil nail

reinforcement in SLOPE/W to stabilize a steep excavation.

Background

The behaviour of reinforced systems depends on the complex interaction between the soil and the

structure. In most cases, the soil provides both the activating and resisting stresses, while the structural

members provide a load transfer mechanism. Consider an earth retaining wall reinforced by a

geosynthetic. The earth pressure acting on the wall will increase as the soil behind the wall deforms

towards the excavation. Assuming the geosynthetic is affixed to the wall, this load will be transferred

deeper into the soil profile. The load transfer occurs as the geosynthetic undergoes elongation (i.e.,

axial strain), which in turn mobilizes shear stress at the interface between the soil and the geosynthetic.

The design of reinforced earth structures has traditionally been conducted using the limit equilibrium

method. Although the complex soil-structure interaction is not modelled using this approach, the

method ensures static equilibrium of the system, thereby providing a global factor of safety for the

ultimate limit state.

1

Soil nails are included in SLOPE/W by defining the pull-out resistance, which represents the amount of

stress mobilized per unit area at the interface between the nail and soil. An implicit assumption is that

enough strain has occurred to mobilize some portion of the pull-out resistance. This resistance is

converted into a force by SLOPE/W based on the geometry of the nail and slip surface, along with other

inputs discussed below.

Numerical Simulation

Figure 1 presents the configuration of the example problem and Table 1 gives the details of the nail

specifications. The domain comprises a 10-m excavation reinforced with four levels of nails. The nails

are spaced 2 m in the out-of-plane direction. Each nail is approximately 8 m in length with a bond

diameter of 0.3183 m.

Input Value

Length 8m

Inclination 14 Degrees

Pullout Resistance 100 kPa

Bond Diameter 0.31831 m

Resistance Reduction Factor 1.5

Nail Spacing 2m

Tensile Capacity 400 kN

Shear Force 0 kN

Shear Reduction Factor 1

There are three cases included in the GeoStudio Project. The soil nails in Case 1 have the factor of safety

option set to ‘No’ with the distributed force option selected and the anchorage option set to ‘Yes’. Case

2

2 introduces the factor of safety dependency option, while Case 3 removes the effect of anchorage at

the face.

Case 1 – Distributed Nail Load

Figure 2 presents the results for Case 1. The Safety Map (red band) represents a zone of several slip

surfaces that have very similar factors of safety. In this case, eight slip surfaces with a factor of safety

between 1.253 and 1.303 sit within this band.

The nail forces used in the factor of safety calculations can be inspected with the View Object

Information command in the Results View (Figure 3). The factored pullout resistance (FPR) represents

the amount of force that can be mobilized in the nail per length of nail and is calculated as:

𝐹𝑃𝑅 = 𝑃𝑅 ∗ 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑅𝑅𝐹 × 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 100 𝑘𝑁 𝑚2 × 1 𝑚2/ (1.5 × 2𝑚) = 33.3 𝑘𝑁 𝑚 Equation 1

( )

where PR and RRF are the pullout resistance and resistance reduction factor, respectively. The RRF is

used to account for any process, such as corrosion or installation damage, that may reduce the

capability of the nail. Note that the FPR is normalized for spacing to account for the two-dimensionality

of a SLOPE/W analysis.

3

Figure 3 Detailed information available on the nail forces used in the stability calculations

The factored tensile capacity (FTC) is also normalized for spacing and is calculated as:

( )

where TC is the tensile capacity and RF the reduction factor. As shown in Figure 3, the length of bar

behind the slip surface is 4.1 m. The factored tensile capacity of the bar is 100 kN, so a length of only

3 m is required to mobilize enough pullout resistance to equal the tensile capacity. The pullout force

applied to the free-body diagram is therefore 100 kN.

The nails are drawn with a dashed line in Figure 1, indicating that the tensile capacity is the governing

component. Stated another way, the length of nail behind the slip surface is long enough to mobilize

the full tensile capacity. The red boxes provide another visual indicator that the maximum amount of

force has been mobilized. The boxes are drawn to a length at which the pullout force equals the tensile

capacity.

Case 1 uses the option to distribute the reinforcement load, which means that the total nail force of 100

kN is distributed amongst all of the slices intersected by the lines of action of the nails. This option is

recommended for analyzing reinforcement because it improves numerical convergence. The F of S

verses lambda plot for the critical slip surface shows a clear cross-over between the force and moment F

4

of S lines, indicating acceptable convergence (Figure 4 Convergence Plot for Case 1Figure 4). Choosing

the option to concentrate the nail force in a single slice usually results in more convergence difficulties

because it creates high strength contrasts between adjacent slices.

1.45

1.4

1.35

1.3 Moment

Slip 41

Factor of Safety

1.25

1.2

1.15 Force

Slip 41

1.1

1.05

1

-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6

Lambda

Figure 5 presents the result for Slip Surface 17. The uppermost soil nail is drawn as a solid line because

the pullout resistance governs. The length of nail behind the slip surface is 2.43 m, yielding a pullout

force of 81.1 kN, which is less than the 100 kN factored tensile capacity.

5

Figure 5 Result for Slip Surface 17

Case 2 – F of S Dependent

Figure 6 present the results for Case 2 in which the factor of safety dependent option has been selected

for all four soil nails. The pullout resistance is therefore factored down by the computed factor of

safety. As such, the specified resistance reduction factors are to 1.0, so that it is possible to better

ascertain the impact of relating the reduction factors to the computed factor of safety.

The force in the lowest nail is governed by the tensile capacity of the bar. The factored tensile capacity

of the bar was calculated as:

6

𝐹𝑇𝐶 = 𝑇𝐶 𝑅𝐹 × 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 400𝑘𝑁 1.518 × 2𝑚 = 131.76𝑘𝑁 Equation 3

( )

The result means that the factor of safety against sliding of the active wedge is 1.518, and the reduction

factors for both the pullout and tensile capacity are also 1.518.

The Safety Map in Figure 6 is relatively wide. Generally this infers that there is more than one mode of

failure with a very similar safety factor. In this example, a shallow slip (near the wall) and a deeper slip

have a similar safety factor that is greater than 1.5. Consequently, the design is acceptable for both

potential modes of failure.

Case 3 – No Anchorage

Excavation faces or slopes that are reinforced with nails usually have some form of structural facing

material, such as a wire reinforcing mesh and shotcrete. The prime purpose of the facing material is to

prevent surface sloughing and to anchor the nails to the face.

SLOPE/W assumes by default that the nails are connected to a facing, even though the facing material is

actually not included in the cross-section. It is possible in SLOPE/W to over-ride the default by setting

the anchorage option to ‘No’ under the KeyIn Reinforcement dialogue box.

Figure 7 shows the result for Case 3 when the nails are not anchored to the facing material. It is noted

that the red box is in front of the slip surface for the bottom two nails. This means that the resistance to

sliding offered by the lower two nails arises from the portion of the nail in-front of the critical slip

surface. The low factor of safety (0.963) for indicates that the design would not perform satisfactorily

without some form of structural facing.

7

Figure 7 Critical Slip Surface for Case 3

Soil nails are a type of reinforcement that can be modelled in SLOPE/W. This example demonstrates

that it is best to distribute the nail forces amongst all of the slices intersected by the line of action, which

yields better convergence. The pull-out resistance of the nails can be factored down by a user-defined

resistance reduction factor or the computed F of S. An anchorage option can also be selected to study

the effect of not including wall facing.

- TN-HU-Muszaki Segedlet DT-013 Pre-Design of Gabion and TerraMesh ENG Rev00 July2013Uploaded byWaldo Enrique Quispe Palomino
- Seismic Analysis of Multi-storied Building on Sloping Ground Using Sap 2000-18262Uploaded byEditor IJAERD
- Combined Analysis of Rdd Scenarios for Levee DesignUploaded byBoy Pardosi
- Slide 1Uploaded byrabodegato
- A Simple Method to Analyze Infiltration Into Unsaturated Soil SlopesUploaded byDavid Esteban
- 2Uploaded byDanielRuiz
- SLOPE_WUploaded bySastra Win
- 103-2libromecanicadesuelosyfundacionesnhiUploaded byMartin Oyervides
- Lecture28_2.pdfUploaded byयोजल बुढाथोकी
- SlopeW 2007 Engineering BookUploaded byrlpr
- SLOPEW 2007 Engineering BookUploaded byArif Nugraha
- soilnailingdesignnewUploaded byjumapx
- Analysis of the Rock Slope Mehdi Zamani 2008Uploaded bywjzabala
- Slope Paper 114Uploaded bygipale31
- Railway 2000 by Terry ClarkUploaded byHewa Wedage Niroshan Anuruddha
- 10.1016@0148-90629292449-MUploaded byparlan
- 2Uploaded bySougata Das
- Slope Stability.pdfUploaded byZac Francis Daymond
- Ground AnchorsUploaded byZaher J. Yazeji
- Ecuación de BromsUploaded byHéctor Martinez
- CGPR 70 the Future of Geotechnical EngineeringUploaded byAnonymous D5s00DdU
- Paper Talud 8Uploaded byWANSHU
- Hong 2005Uploaded byjacs127
- JTG D30-2004Uploaded bySolomon Balemezi
- Canal Failure - a Case Study in Forensic Civil EngineeringUploaded byRakesh7770
- bfm_978-1-4757-5271-7%2F1Uploaded byJuan Carlos Tasilla Villanueva
- spacing discontinuitiesUploaded bygia26
- Reinforcement With Geosynthetics(1)Uploaded byFarhan
- 4._bio-engineering(1).pdfUploaded byNiteshKrJha
- State of the art and practice in geotechnical engineeringUploaded byAndream_56pjhm

- Power HandbookUploaded byIhuhwa Marta Tau
- Supplementary Notes 3Uploaded bySegu
- CPm322E CH6 Cash FlowUploaded bypapilolo2008
- Structural ARES5ch14ALFREED (12)Uploaded byalfie
- L11_EstEarthWk9811.pptUploaded byjamilthalji
- Tokombayev Asu 0010N 13625Uploaded bymark myword
- ACCC Data Sheets(Metric size).pdfUploaded bykabardey46
- The Technical and Economic Efficiency OfUploaded bymark myword
- Transmission Line DesignUploaded byCamille Licuanan Nabo
- acccc_ampUploaded byAnonymous zAwBlmxu
- 000000000001001811Uploaded byDante Filho
- gtascr3Uploaded bymark myword
- HCC.pdfUploaded bymark myword
- nhi14007.pdfUploaded byLuis Marcos
- Tie BackUploaded byPanxo Ordenes
- Failure of Soil Nail WallsUploaded byAndy Acoustic
- 3 Overhead Line and Substation Construction MethodologyUploaded bymark myword
- IEEE Seminar - Fundamentals of Modern Protective Relaying - Part1Uploaded bymark myword

- Maxsys PC4820 - Manual Instalare.pdfUploaded byDarie Silviu
- The Gentlemen of the JungleUploaded byrinlacer
- Tagalog_Science_Names.pdfUploaded byAlemante Molla
- Recording 1983 12Uploaded byJuan Mamani
- PhysicsUploaded byGRACIA BUJAY
- All Civil Engineer - Upto 08-10-10Uploaded byBarjinder Singh Ghai
- Elements in Landscape Design - Unit 2Uploaded bynivetha jayaraman
- Chapter 1-3 Thesis.docxUploaded bySasheen Dela Cruz
- Culture-Dependent and -Independent Methods to Investigate the Microbial Ecology of Italian Fermented SausagesUploaded byCik Meamizuno
- John Clare: Selected PoemsUploaded byemmalaybourn
- Nasa Std 5008aUploaded bymsuid
- Christian_Andersson_thesis-succinic.pdfUploaded byprivaz81
- BleachUploaded byteamegi
- Folding Chair Lydia.pdfUploaded byvladetaj
- PumpSizing SelectionUploaded byJessicalba Lou
- ASOV Illustration and InstructionsUploaded byPASEOS13728
- skin presentation.pptUploaded byThif Lah
- Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering ScheduleUploaded bysshawash
- BP 6DOF for Planing Boat HullsUploaded byValbort Hernandez
- 557 Skills and Drills - OLUploaded byAnwar Brooks
- Brit Only 19Uploaded bytrefall1233480
- CLEANING CHEMICAL CC1-TECH SPECS-ENG-R2-PTUploaded bysgpttech
- Micron Solutions Guide HPC Applications LoUploaded byDean Michael B Ancajas
- UntitledUploaded byAdam Knott
- 22 Names for the inner child, child withinUploaded byBruce Dickson
- weighbridge_ukl_500322Uploaded byDinda Intan
- PVR Lessons Book 2Uploaded byapi-19937293
- process safetyUploaded bymujolico
- Bathes MethodUploaded byluisazcarate
- BO1DAUploaded byEdith Alvarez Tano

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.