8 views

Uploaded by dzikryds

a pdf about water flow through soil

- PE Review Hydrology
- Garbage Room Ventilation
- Coefficient of Permibility and Void
- (Exp # 5)Energy Losses in Bends
- Minor Losses in pipes
- Axial Flow Pump Test
- Mechanics of Fluids and Hydraulic Machines
- is.7784.2.3.1996.pdf
- Laboratory and field hydrologic characterization of the shallow subsurface at Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory waste-disposal site
- Lashkar Gah Site Work
- Question Bank Geotech Dev
- 04 Manifold Hydraulics
- Penstock Formula
- Lower Mahandi Design (84-105)
- SPE-167753-PA
- Total Head Calculation 4
- Ground Water
- 2K Method Excess Head Loss in Pipe Fittings Rev1
- Lab 12. Falling Hea Test. GP3. SE 4101
- D5126.PDF

You are on page 1of 15

CONTENTS: Introduction, hydraulic head and water flow, Darcy’s equation, laboratory

determination of coefficient of permeability, field determination of coefficient of

coefficient of permeability for different soils, flow net, one dimensional flow net,

base.

6.1 INTRODUCTION

Soils are permeable due to the existence of interconnected voids through which water

can flow from points of high energy to low energy. The study of the flow of water

Consider a water flow through a soil specimen filled in a clean pipe and shown in Figure

6.1. Because of the water level difference between the left and right side of the pipe,

water flows from left to right. The water level difference is called total head loss

Bernoulli’s equation is used to define the flow of water through soil masses in the

following equation

𝑢 𝑣2

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑎𝑑 = 𝑧 + 𝑝 + 𝑣 = 𝑧 + + … … … … … . (6.1)

𝛾𝑤 2𝑔

Where, u is the pore water pressure and v is the flow velocity

Flow of Water Through Soils

Head loss is an energy loss. When water flows in soils, it must flow through many small

passages in void sections of soils as illustrated in Figure 6.2. This creates frictional

Figure 6.2: Frictional energy loss around particles due to water flow

Page | 43

Flow of Water Through Soils

The energy of water flow comes from the total head loss and it follows Dancy’s law in

𝑣 = 𝑘𝑖 … … … … … . (6.2)

∆

𝑞 = 𝑣𝐴 = 𝑘𝑖𝐴 = 𝑘 𝐴 … … … … … . (6.3)

𝐿

𝑄 = 𝑞𝑡 = 𝑘𝑖𝐴𝑡 = 𝑘 ∆ 𝐴𝑡 𝐿 … … … … … . (6.4)

Where,

The discharge velocity used in the above equation is not the true velocity of water flow

but is rather an average velocity in the flow direction through the porous media. Since

water can flow only in the void section of the media, the true velocity must be faster

𝑣

𝑣𝑠 = … … … … … . (6.5)

𝑛

However, the real velocity of water molecules are even faster than true velocity since

real passage are not straight but rather meandering with longer passages around the

particles.

Two standard laboratory tests are used to determine the coefficient of permeability /

Page | 44

Flow of Water Through Soils

The experimental setup of the constant head permeability test is illustrated in the

Figure 6.3. The soil specimen is prepared in a vertical standing cylindrical mold, and a

constant hydraulic head is applied. Under a steady state flow condition, discharged

𝑄𝐿

𝑘= … … … … … . (6.6)

𝐴 ∆ 𝑡

Where, Q: collected amount of water for a time period t

The specimen is prepared similarly as in the constant head test and is shown in Figure

6.4. The higher head is applied through a burette in which the head changes with time.

The head at the discharging side is constant as seen. At initial time (t=t1), head loss is

Page | 45

Flow of Water Through Soils

∆h1, and t=t2, head loss is ∆h2. The amount of water flow “q” is equal to the change in

head loss (d∆h) multiplied by the burette’s cross sectional area “a” per time “dt”.

𝑑∆ ∆

𝑞 = −𝑎 =𝑘 𝐴

𝑑𝑡 𝐿

𝑎𝐿 𝑑∆

𝑑𝑡 = −

𝐴𝑘 ∆

Integration from t1 to t2,

𝑡2 ∆ 2

𝑎𝐿 𝑑∆

𝑑𝑡 = −

𝑡1 𝐴𝑘 ∆ 1 ∆

𝑎𝐿 ∆1

𝑘= ln … … … … … . (6.7)

𝐴 𝑡2 − 𝑡1 ∆2

The constant head is usually used for coarse grained soils and the falling head test is

that samples are reconstituted mostly for sand and gravels, and for cohesive soils,

Page | 46

Flow of Water Through Soils

to the laboratory, and inserting it into the test mold. The sample size is also so small

that the measured values may not be necessarily true representation of field

Thus an alternative way is to conduct field permeability test . The classic field

permeability test methods involve pumping water from a well and observing water table

changes in two observation wells. Two idealized field experiments are given in the

subsequent sections

As seen in the Figure 6.5, a well is excavated through the permeable layer, and two

observation wells are installed at r1 and r2 distances from the center of well hole.

Water is pumped out with a steady rate until the height of water level at the well and

also at the two observations wells become stable. The theory for this idealized

situation gives,

𝑞 𝑟2

𝑘= 2 ln 𝑟 … … … … … . (6.8)

𝜋 22 − 1 1

Figure 6.5: Field permeability test for unconfined permeable layer underlain by

impervious layer

Page | 47

Flow of Water Through Soils

CONFINED AQUIFER

Figure 6.6 Shows an idealized case with a pervious layer that is sandwiched by two

impervious layers. The water table is in the upper impervious layer. This situation is

called confined aquifer. A well is dug into the lower impervious layer and two

observations wells are installed. A steady state flow is established. The solution to

𝑞 𝑟2

𝑘= ln … … … … … . (6.9)

2𝜋𝐻 2 − 1 𝑟1

Where, H: thickness of permeable layer

HAZEN’S FORMULA

Hazen’s empirical formula is most widely used for saturated sandy soils.

2

𝐾 = 𝐶 𝐷10 … … … … … . (6.10)

Where,

𝐶: Hazen’s empirical coefficient which ranges from 0.4 to 10.0 with average value of 1.0

Page | 48

Flow of Water Through Soils

CHAPUI’S FORMULA

0.7825

2

𝑒3

𝑘 = 2.4622 𝐷10 … … … … … . (6.11)

1+𝑒

KOZENY AND CARMAN’S FORMULA

A more reliable semi theoretical and semi empirical formula is given by Kozeny and

Carman as

𝛾𝑤 1 𝑒3

𝑘= … … … … … . (6.12)

𝜂𝑤 𝐶𝑘−𝑐 𝑆𝑠2 1 + 𝑒

𝜂𝑤 : Viscosity of water (1.307 x 10-3 N sec / sqm for t = 100C, 1.002 x 10-3 N sec/sqm

for t=200C)

𝛾𝑤 : 9.81 KN/cum

𝑆𝑠 = 𝑆𝐹 𝐷

𝑒𝑓𝑓

100%

𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑓 =

𝑓𝑖

𝐷𝑎𝑣𝑔 ,𝑖

0.5 0.5

𝐷𝑎𝑣𝑔 ,𝑖 = 𝐷1,𝑖 𝐷𝑠,𝑖

𝑓𝑖 : Fraction (%) of particles between two sieve sizes with 𝐷1,𝑖 as larger and 𝐷𝑠,𝑖 as

SOILS

clay <0.000001

Page | 49

Flow of Water Through Soils

Flow net is a convenient graphical tool to compute hydraulic properties such as the

amount of water flow, water pressure on flow boundaries, etc., for two dimensional flow

problems with complex geometries. The theory of flow net can be demonstrated by

using the Laplace equation for the hydraulic potential. However, a simple one

The following Figure 6.7 shows a water flow through soil in a vertical cylinder with

length L and area A. the flow is downward. The cylinder is equally divided in three flow

channels, which are parallel to the flow lines, and water flow never crosses the flow

lines. The total head loss occurs from the top of the specimen to the bottom of the

Specimen is equally divided by four blocks. Since the head loss occurs linearly through

the specimen depth, the head losses between adjacent horizontal lines are all ∆ 4.

The total heads on individual horizontal lines are constant since they have the same

elevation heads and pressure heads, and thus called equipotential lines. Flow lines and

Page | 50

Flow of Water Through Soils

In the flow net, equipotential lines and the flow lines intersect each other at right

angles.

From figure 6.7 , the amount of water flow through the small rectangular section is ,

∆

𝑁𝑑 1 𝑎

𝑞𝑎 = 𝑘𝑖𝑎 = 𝑘 𝑎 = 𝑘∆

𝑏 𝑁𝑑 𝑏

Total amount of water flow through the entire cross section is

𝑁𝑓 𝑎

𝑞𝐴 = 𝑞𝑎 𝑁𝑓 = 𝑘∆

𝑁𝑑 𝑏

Taking , a=b

𝑁𝑓

𝑞𝐴 = 𝑘∆

𝑁𝑑

𝑁𝑓

Here, is called the shape factor.

𝑁𝑑

trial.

3. Identify the boundary flow lines and boundary equipotential lines in the drawing.

ground surface are the initial and the final equipotential lines, respectively. The

front and backside of the sheet pile and the surface of the impervious layer are

4. First draw trial flow lines with selected Nf for entire earth structures. This

must be done based on the engineer’s best instinct on how water flows. It should

be noted that there are equal amounts of water flow through all flow channels.

5. By starting from the upstream site, draw the first equipotential line to have all

6. Continue the foregoing step for the second and third equipotential lines and so

Page | 51

Flow of Water Through Soils

Figure 6.9 shows a homogeneous earth dam resting on an impervious base. Let the

hydraulic conductivity of the compacted material of which the earth dam is mad be

equal to k. the free surface of the water passing through the dam is given by abcd.

It is assumed that a’bc is parabolic. The slope of the free surface can be assumed

to be equal to the hydraulic gradient. It is also assumed that, because this hydraulic

Page | 52

Flow of Water Through Soils

Figure 6.9: Flow through an earth dam constructed over an impervious base

𝑑𝑧

𝑖≅

𝑑𝑥

Considering the triangle cde, we can give the rate of seepage per unit length of the

dam as

𝑞 = 𝑘𝑖𝐴

𝑑𝑧

𝑖= = tan 𝛼

𝑑𝑥

𝐴 = 𝑐𝑒 1 = 𝐿 sin 𝛼

Thus,

𝑞 = 𝐾𝐿 tan 𝛼 sin 𝛼

Again , the rate of seepage (per unit length of the dam) through the section bf is

𝑑𝑧 𝑑𝑧

𝑞 = 𝑘𝑖𝐴 = 𝑘 𝑧 × 1 = 𝑘𝑧

𝑑𝑥 𝑑𝑥

For continuous flow,

𝑑𝑧

𝑘𝑧 = 𝐾𝐿 tan 𝛼 sin 𝛼

𝑑𝑥

𝑧=𝐻 𝑥=𝑑

𝑘𝑧𝑑𝑧 = 𝐾𝐿 tan 𝛼 sin 𝛼 𝑑𝑥

𝑧=𝐿 sin ∝ 𝑥=𝐿 cos 𝛼

𝑑 𝑑2 𝐻2

𝐿= − −

cos 𝛼 𝑐𝑜𝑠 2 𝛼 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝛼

Page | 53

Flow of Water Through Soils

1. Obtain α.

3. Calculate d.

[TRY TO SOLVE]

[1] In a constant head permeater test, the following observations were taken.

[2] the falling head permeability test was conducted on a soil sample of 4cm diameter

and 18cm length. The head fell from 1.0m to 0.40m in 20 minutes. If the cross sectional

[3] A sandy layer 10m thick overlies an impervious stratum. The water table is in the

sandy layer at a depth of 1.5m below the ground surface. Water is pumped out from a

well at the rate of 100 liters per second and the drawdown of the water table at radial

distances of 3.0m and 25.0 m is 3.0 and 0.50m, respectively. Determine the coefficient

of permeability.

Page | 54

Flow of Water Through Soils

𝐾𝐻 𝑒𝑞

𝐾𝑉 𝑒𝑞

Problem - 4

(a) Calculate and plot the water pressure distribution along the base of the dam.

(b) Compute the resultant uplift force against the base of the dam.

Problem - 5

Page | 55

Flow of Water Through Soils

[6] An earth dam is shown in the following figure. Determine the seepage rate, q in

m3/day/m length. Given, α1=α2=450, L1= 5m, H=10m, H1=13m, and k=2x10-4 cm/sec.

Problem - 6

Page | 56

- PE Review HydrologyUploaded bypeagriculture
- Garbage Room VentilationUploaded byQOBIT
- Coefficient of Permibility and VoidUploaded bySowande Parkinson
- (Exp # 5)Energy Losses in BendsUploaded byhamZA
- Minor Losses in pipesUploaded byRam Krishna Singh
- Axial Flow Pump TestUploaded byOnye Walson
- Mechanics of Fluids and Hydraulic MachinesUploaded byvenkat_nsn
- is.7784.2.3.1996.pdfUploaded bymanoj_structure
- Laboratory and field hydrologic characterization of the shallow subsurface at Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory waste-disposal siteUploaded byJon Kaminsky
- Lashkar Gah Site WorkUploaded byoctatheweel
- Question Bank Geotech DevUploaded byASHWANI KUMAR
- 04 Manifold HydraulicsUploaded bygkvmit
- Penstock FormulaUploaded byGertjan Duniceri
- Lower Mahandi Design (84-105)Uploaded byJagadish_2
- SPE-167753-PAUploaded byDavid Montoya
- Total Head Calculation 4Uploaded byHerberth Silitonga
- Ground WaterUploaded byYogeesh Jayaramu
- 2K Method Excess Head Loss in Pipe Fittings Rev1Uploaded bysiva242245
- Lab 12. Falling Hea Test. GP3. SE 4101Uploaded byAldin
- D5126.PDFUploaded bygad
- Weight Volume RelationshipUploaded byNico Geotina
- Directiva Transferencia 008 2018 CONTRALORIAUploaded byDavid Espinoza Laveriano
- P1434 (1).pdfUploaded bySamuel Laura Huanca
- Microfem TutorialUploaded byetsimo
- Venturi effectUploaded bymuhammad rid
- lecture_notes_08.pdfUploaded byGABRIEL MORENO
- 15.15Uploaded byAndré Guimarães Gomes
- Chap5Uploaded byketo2008
- Hydrological Investigation.pdfUploaded byRancho
- Gear PumptestUploaded byRam Niwas

- solidUploaded bydzikryds
- Bearing Capacity of Shallow foundationsUploaded bySnow Yoshima
- programmingUploaded bydzikryds
- cost of qualityUploaded bydzikryds
- 8 pipe note 3Uploaded byAnastasia Monica Khunniegalshottest
- Introduction to the Construction systems in Malaysia.pptUploaded bydzikryds
- ACV DiscussionUploaded bydzikryds
- Chapter 2 BuildingUploaded bydzikryds
- Chap4 ExerciseUploaded bydzikryds
- Fluid Mechanics d203 ReseniUploaded byDennys Fabricio Ramirez
- Experiment 3 Moisture ContentUploaded bydzikryds
- Experiment 2 Title Specific Gravity and Water Absorption of Fine and Coarse AggregateUploaded bydzikryds
- Experiment 4 Bulk ConclusionUploaded bydzikryds
- Experimet 1.4 ReynoldUploaded bydzikryds
- experiment 1.2 center of pressure.pdfUploaded bydzikryds
- Experiment 1 Properties FluidUploaded bydzikryds
- Concrete Mix DesignUploaded bydzikryds
- Experiment 2Uploaded bydzikryds
- 3-1 - Construction Plants - Moving Machine (1)Uploaded bydzikryds
- LEVEL 2 - Comp n Flexural Tests Hardened ConcUploaded bydzikryds
- 3.3 and 3.4-Determination of Friction Losses and SEPARATION in a Pipe FLOWUploaded bydzikryds
- 3.1 non-uniform flow.pdfUploaded bydzikryds
- LECTURE 1.3Uploaded bydzikryds
- LECTURE 1.3.pdfUploaded bydzikryds
- Stress4_mt07Uploaded bydzikryds
- Inclined StressUploaded byAli El-Gazzar

- anambra 3Uploaded byPaul Lixfe
- HeadKDarcysLaw1pdf.pdfUploaded byYashwanth Kumar
- Basic Groundwater HydrologyUploaded byAdnan Husain
- ASTM D6067 - 10 Standard Practice for Using the Electronic Piezocone Penetrometer Tests for Environmental Site CharacterizationUploaded byHoracio Martin Basualdo Fiore
- vnk-5Uploaded byAastha Soni
- Evaluacion Hidrogeologica en Medios FracturadosUploaded byMonica Urbieta
- Evaluating the impact of river restoration on the local groundwater and ecological system: a case study in NE FlandersUploaded byfred
- 136345984-Groundwater-Hydrology-Tutorial.pdfUploaded byJames K. Kirahuka
- R7936aUploaded byrustantoandry
- Chapter 17 - Hydrology and GroundwaterUploaded byittzme
- Guide Groundwater Hydrology CAREWATER 2008Uploaded byRakesh Kumar
- plugin-KonzaModflowTutorialUploaded bymaribo2005
- Unit ConverterUploaded byali_irv
- Bense & Van Balen2004 - The Effect of Fault Relayand Clay Smearing on GW Flow PatternUploaded byYunus Ashari
- Hydro 1Uploaded byMuhammad Rizwan
- 20140804_GW Flow Models in the Bukit Timah GraniteUploaded byadf500
- 3CORRELATION BETWEEN GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE AND UNSATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY CURVE OF SOILSUploaded bymchetia
- estimating K from CPT and CPTU data.pdfUploaded byAnonymous CQ4rbzLVE
- Uplift pressure removal by geocompositeUploaded bythadikkaran
- Workshop Pumping TestUploaded byjames_frank
- Falling-Head Double Ring InfiltrometerUploaded byAzhar Fuadi
- Hydraulic Conductivity of Tailings IR12Uploaded bysenhu
- mualem1976Uploaded byDemis Andrade
- IOSR JournalsUploaded byInternational Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR)
- BeFo_Rapport_124_web.pdfUploaded byFCW
- Cashmere Mill Dewatering Analysis Report (1)Uploaded byRani Fouad
- These_4156_MattiUploaded byvgfrd
- Comparision of Radial Collector WellUploaded byPRATUL CHOUDHURY
- Hydrogeological and Groundwater ModelingUploaded byCristina Ene
- BRS- The Chalk of the Colne and Lee River -CR03069NUploaded byMatt