0 views

Original Title: ACP_sec4(1).pdf

Uploaded by Ryan Travers

- Science of Nhl Hockey
- A First Book of Quantum Field Theory [Lahiri-Pal]
- QualificationExam.pdf
- Mechanics Problem Set_8
- Physics 11 Outcomes
- gsxi
- [Susskind, L.] Why Do Things Fall
- Particle Tracing Module COMSOL
- two-body-problem-and-delanuy-elements.pdf
- poincare
- ACP_PS6_sol(1).pdf
- Circular Restricted Three Body Model
- 1011
- Week 12 ---Impulse+Momentum+Impact
- iimmpp
- 9910012
- Pendu Lo
- Practical Challenges in the Method of Controlled Lagrangians - Chevva
- Assignment Four the Navier Stokes Equations
- Sheppard Thesis MS Mathematics

You are on page 1of 9

Hamiltonian Mechanics

In the Lagrangian formulation of mechanics, the state of the system is descibed by a set of N

generalised coordinates qi and and their time derivatives q̇i . For brevity we shall write it in the

form L(q, q̇) and let the q and q̇ stand for the whole set.

In Eq. (3.2.11) we defined the generalised momentum pi (q, q̇) = @L/@ q̇i . The basic idea

of the Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics is to use coordinates and momenta (q, p) rather

than coordinates and velocities (q, q̇) to parameterise the system. The space of momenta and

coordinates is known as the phase space, so the Hamiltonian describes the evolution in phase

space. Although the two formulations are mathematically and physically equivalent, the Hamil-

tonian formulation provides new insight especially when moving to quantum mechanics which

is usually described in the Hamiltonian formulation.

To move from velocities to momenta, one has to invert Eq. (3.2.11) to find the velocities in

terms of coordinates and momenta,

q̇i = q̇i (q, p). (4.1.1)

Having done this, we define the Hamiltonian function H by Legendre transformation

N

X

H(q, p) = pi q̇i (q, p) L (q, q̇(q, p)) . (4.1.2)

i=1

Note that H is a function of coordinates qi and momenta pi , whereas the Lagrangian L is a func-

tion of coordinates qi and velocities q̇i . This is analogous to transformations between different

thermodynamic potentials in statistical physics. We will see that we can obtain the equations

of motion of the system from the Hamiltonian, and therefore it determines the dynamics of the

system.

As a simple example, consider a particle in a one-dimensional potential V (x). The La-

grangian is

L = 12 mẋ2 V (x). (4.1.3)

1

Kibble & Berkshire, chapter 12

49

Advanced Classical Physics, Autumn 2016 Hamiltonian Mechanics

@L

p= = mẋ, (4.1.4)

@ ẋ

which we can easily invert to find ẋ = p/m. Therefore the Hamiltonian is

p2 p2 p2

H(x, p) = pẋ L(x, ẋ) = + V (x) = + V (x). (4.1.5)

m 2m 2m

This Hamiltonian is, of course, familiar from quantum mechanics.

In order to see how the equations of motion arise from the Hamiltonian, let us calculate its

derivatives with respect to momenta and coordinates. Using Eqs. (4.1.2) and (3.2.11), we find

@H X @ q̇i X @L @ q̇i

= q̇j + pi = q̇j , (4.1.6)

@pj i

@pj i

@ q̇i @pj

@H X @ q̇i @L X @L @ q̇i @L d @L

= pi = = = ṗj , (4.1.7)

@qj i

@qj @qj i

@ q̇i @qj @qj dt @ q̇j

where we used the Euler-Lagrange equation (3.2.1) in the last step. These results are known as

Hamilton’s equations,

@H

q̇i = ,

@pi

@H

ṗi = . (4.1.8)

@qi

Together, they determine the evolution of coordinates and momenta, and they are therefore the

equations of motion in the Hamiltonian formulation.

We can also calculate the time derivative of the Hamiltonian,

dH @H X @H X @H

= + q̇i + ṗi

dt @t i

@qi i

@pi

✓ ◆

@H X @H @H @H @H @H

= + = . (4.1.9)

@t i

@q i @p i @p i @q i @t

In particular this means that if the Hamiltonian has no explicit time dependence (i.e. @H/@t = 0),

then the Hamiltonian is conserved.

To understand better the physical meaning of the Hamiltonian, let us assume that the system

is natural (see Section 3.5.1), so that the kinetic energy can be written as

1X

T = aij q̇i q̇j . (4.1.10)

2 ij

50

Advanced Classical Physics, Autumn 2016 Hamiltonian Mechanics

p

3

2

1

x

-3 -2 -1 1 2 3

-1

-2

-3

@L X

pi = = aij q̇j . (4.1.11)

@ q̇i j

X X 1X 1X

H= pi q̇i L = aij q̇i q̇j aij q̇i q̇j +V (q) = aij q̇i q̇j +V (q) = T +V. (4.1.12)

i ij

2 ij 2 ij

This demonstrates that the Hamiltonian is nothing but the total energy of the system, and which

also explains why it is conserved.

As a simple example, let us consider a particle in a harmonic potential. The Hamiltonian is

p2 1

H= + kx2 . (4.1.13)

2m 2

Hamilton’s equations are

@H p

ẋ = = ,

@p m

@H

ṗ = = kx. (4.1.14)

@x

The evolution of the system can be desribed by a trajectory in phase space (x, p). In the

harmonic case, the solutions are ellipses (see Fig. 4.1). Note that because Hamilton’s equations

are first-order, the phase space trajectories cannot cross, but they can have fixed points at which

the derivatives vanish. One can often deduce the qualitative properties of the solutions by simply

finding the fixed points and considering the behaviour near them. In the Harmonic case, there is

one fixed point at x = p = 0.

51

Advanced Classical Physics, Autumn 2016 Hamiltonian Mechanics

p

3

2

1

θ

-3 -2 -1 1 2 3

-1

-2

-3

1

L = mR2 ✓˙2 + mgR cos ✓. (4.1.15)

2

The generalised momentum is

@L ˙

p✓ = = mR2 ✓, (4.1.16)

˙

@✓

from which we find

p✓

✓˙ = . (4.1.17)

mR2

Therefore the Hamiltonian is

p2✓ 1 p2✓ 1 p2✓

H = p✓ ✓˙ L= mgR cos ✓ = mgR cos ✓. (4.1.18)

mR2 2 mR2 2 mR2

Hamilton’s equations are

@H p✓ @H

✓˙ = = , ṗ✓ = = mgR sin ✓. (4.1.19)

@p✓ mR2 @✓

These equations have fixed points at p✓ = 0 and ✓ = n⇡ where n is an arbitrary integer. Even

integers correspond to the minimum-energy state in which the pendulum is pointing down, and

the odd integers are unstable states in which the pendulum points exactly up. By considering

the qualitative motion we can draw a phase space diagram of the trajectories (Fig. 4.2) without

having to actually solve the equations.

Suppose now that we want to study the behaviour of some other quantity which depends on p and

q such that its value changes as p and q change under control of the Hamiltonian. Let F (q, p, t)

52

Advanced Classical Physics, Autumn 2016 Hamiltonian Mechanics

N ✓ ◆

dF @F X @F @F

= + q̇i + ṗi

dt @t i=1

@qi @pi

N ✓ ◆

@F X @F @H @F @H

= + (4.2.1)

@t i=1

@qi @pi @pi @qi

@F

= + {F, H}

@t

where the quantity

XN ✓ ◆

@F @H @F @H

{F, H} = (4.2.2)

i=1

@qi @pi @pi @qi

is known as a Poisson bracket. Compare this with the equation for an operator in quantum

mechanics (in the Heisenberg picture)

dF̂ @ F̂ 1

= + [F̂ , Ĥ] , (4.2.3)

dt @t i~

where [F̂ , Ĥ] = F̂ Ĥ Ĥ F̂ is the commutator of F̂ and Ĥ.

Let us note some basic properties of Poisson brackets. They are antisymmetric, {F, H} =

{H, F }. If F has no explicit time–dependence, @F @t

= 0, and the Poisson bracket {F, H} is

zero, then F is independent of time; F represents a conserved quantity. The Poisson brackets for

coordinates and momenta are simply

which resemble the canonical commutation relations in quantum mechanics. We can also write

Hamilton’s equations in terms of Poisson brackets as

We have already noted in Sec. 3.2 a relationship between symmetry and conservation laws. If the

Lagrangian does not depend on coordinate qi , then the corresponding momentum pi is conserved.

In terms of the Hamiltonian, we have the corresponding result that if H does not depend on qi ,

then

@H

ṗi = = 0, (4.3.1)

@qi

so pi is conserved.

So far, this result is only useful if we have chosen the coordinate system to reflect the symme-

try. For example, if we have a two-dimensional problem with rotation symmetry, and we express

53

Advanced Classical Physics, Autumn 2016 Hamiltonian Mechanics

it in polar coordinates (r, ✓), the Hamiltonian does not depend on the polar angle ✓, and we find

that the corresponding momentum is conserved.

However, if we had chosen to use Cartesian coordinates (x, y), we could not use the above

result. In this case, the Hamiltonian would be

p2x + p2y ⇣p ⌘

H= +V 2 2

x +y . (4.3.2)

2m

In order to treat a situation like this, we can consider an infinitesimal rotation. When we rotate

the system by an infinitesimal angle ✓, the coordinates change as

✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆

x x+ x x y ✓

! , where = , (4.3.3)

y y+ y y x ✓

and correspondingly the momenta change as

✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆ ✓ ◆

px px + p x px py ✓

! , where = . (4.3.4)

py py + p y py px ✓

If we find that the Hamiltonian does not change under such a rotation, we say that the Hamilto-

nian is invariant.

More generally, consider a transformation generated by some function G(q, p) under which

the coordinates and momenta change as

@G @G

qi = , pi = , (4.3.5)

@pi @qi

where is an infinitesimal parameter. For the above rotation, the generator is

Under this transformation, the Hamiltonian changes as

dH X ✓ @H @qi @H @pi ◆

= +

d i

@q i @ @pi @

X @H @G @H @G ◆

✓

= = {H, G}. (4.3.7)

i

@q i @p i @p i @q i

This means that the Hamiltonian is invariant under the transformation if {H, G} = 0. But if this

is the case, then G is conserved because then

dG

= {G, H} = 0. (4.3.8)

dt

Therefore, we have found a more general form of Noether’s theorem: If the Hamiltonian is

invariant under a continuous transformation, then the generator G of the transformation is a

conserved charge.

54

Advanced Classical Physics, Autumn 2016 Hamiltonian Mechanics

Familiar examples of this are rotations, for which the conserved charge is the angular mo-

mentum L as we saw above and translations, for which the conserved charge is momentum p.

To see the latter, consider G = px . Then we have

@G @G

x= = , px = = 0, (4.3.9)

@px @x

so this is, indeed, the generator of translations.

Conservation of energy (or, equivalently, the Hamiltonian H) can also be understood in this

way. Choosing G = H as the generator, the coordinates and momenta transform as

@H

qi = = q̇i ,

@pi

@H

pi = = ṗi . (4.3.10)

@qi

This means just time translation t ! t + , so energy conservation is a direct consequence of

time translation invariance.

These are deep results because they mean that the conservation of angular momentum, mo-

mentum and energy, which we derived earlier using the equations of motion, and actually very

general results and are valid whenever the Hamiltonian has the corresponding symmetries, irre-

spective of it precise form.

In addition to the coordinate transformations considered in the previous section, the Hamiltonian

formulation allows even more freedom in how to parameterise the system. To see this, note that

the time evolution of a function F (q, p; t) depends only on the Poisson bracket (4.2.2)

dF @F

= + {F, H}. (4.4.1)

dt @t

Therefore, if one finds another set of coordinates Q and momenta P that gives the same Poisson

brackets, i.e.,

{f, g}Q,P = {f, g}q,p (4.4.2)

for every pair of functions f and g, then they will be equally valid variables to parameterise the

system. A transformation

q ! Q(q, p),

p ! P (p, q), (4.4.3)

that takes the original coordinates q and momenta p to the new ones satisfying Eq. (4.4.2) is

known a canonical transformation. In fact, it turns out that it is enough to check that the Poisson

brackets (4.2.4) for coordinates and momenta are unchanged under the transformation, i.e.,

55

Advanced Classical Physics, Autumn 2016 Hamiltonian Mechanics

Any set of variables that satisfy these conditions are called canonical conjugates.

As an example, consider the Hamiltonian

p2 1

H= + kx2 + cpx, (4.4.5)

2m 2

where c is a constant. The last term, which is linear in p, makes this Hamiltonian unusual, but

we can use a canonical transformation to write it in a more standard form. To see how to do that,

let us first rearrange the terms to write the Hamiltonian as

(p + cmx)2 1

H= + (k c2 m)x2 . (4.4.6)

2m 2

This suggests a transformation

P = p + cmx, Q = x. (4.4.7)

It is easy to check that they satisfy the conditions (4.4.4),

@Q @P @Q @P

{Q, Q} = {P, P } = 0, {Q, P } = = 1 ⇥ 1 0 = 1. (4.4.8)

@x @p @p @x

Therefore Q and P and canonical conjugates, and (4.4.7) is a canonical transformation. In terms

of Q and P , the Hamiltonian is simply

P2 1

H= + (k c2 m)Q2 , (4.4.9)

2m 2

which is just a standard harmonic oscillator. This illustrates how one can sometimes use canoni-

cal transformations to turn the Hamiltonian into a familiar form, for which the solution is already

known. For example, one can always remove a linear term in p by the transformation

Q = q, P = p + f (q). (4.4.10)

It is important to understand that canonical transformations generally mix coordinates and

momenta, and therefore the distinction between them essentially disappears in the Hamiltonian

formulation. Because of this, it is interesting to see what a canonical transformation means in

the Lagrangian formulation, which uses only coordinates to describe the system. In general, the

transformation changes the Lagrangian, so we denote the new Lagrangian by L0 . The Hamilto-

nian is unchanged, so we have

H = pq̇ L = P Q̇ L0 , (4.4.11)

from which we find

L0 = P Q̇ pq̇ + L. (4.4.12)

Considering, for example, the transformation (4.4.10), this is

L0 = L + f (q)q̇. (4.4.13)

Rq

The extra term is just the total time derivative of the integral F (q) = f (q 0 )dq 0 ,

dF

L0 = L + . (4.4.14)

dt

Such a total derivative changes the action by a constant, and therefore does not affect the dynam-

ics.

56

Chapter 5

Dynamical Systems

Dynamical systems with simple solutions have been examined so far by considering individual

solutions to equations of motions with a restricted set of parameters and initial (or boundary)

conditions.

In this section we will introduce a new method that allows us to gain a much wider un-

derstanding of all possible solutions of a system under different assumptions for either control

parameters or initial conditions. The method involves examining the geometry of the phase space

of the system and was first introduced by Poincaré.

These methods are particularly useful when the system being considered displays behaviour

that is dependent, in a non-trivial way, on initial conditions or system parameters. The com-

plicated behaviour these systems can display may not be understood, or indeed expected, by

examining individual solutions.

In the following we will describe the state of a dynamical system using a number of continuous

functions xi (t) with i = 1, 2, ..., N and t is the independent variable eg. time.

The functions could describe positions, momenta, velocities, densities etc. and the equations

of motion for the system can be written in vector notations as

dx

ẋ ⌘ = F(x, t) , (5.1.1)

dt

where the functions F contain any number of control parameters c describing how the generalised

phase velocities ẋ react to the generalised state coordinates x. The control parameters could

describe system properties such as mass, spring constants, gravity etc..

You should be familiar with the fact that higher order systems can all be reduced to the first

order form of Eq. (5.1.1) by including each derivative of the state variable as extra variables. For

1

Kibble & Berkshire, chapter 13

57

- Science of Nhl HockeyUploaded byjanemarffy
- A First Book of Quantum Field Theory [Lahiri-Pal]Uploaded bytulinne
- QualificationExam.pdfUploaded byShweta Sridhar
- Mechanics Problem Set_8Uploaded byPerry Esguerra
- Physics 11 OutcomesUploaded byryan_wk
- gsxiUploaded byKashish Garg
- [Susskind, L.] Why Do Things FallUploaded bylev76
- Particle Tracing Module COMSOLUploaded byDeepan Kishore Kumar
- two-body-problem-and-delanuy-elements.pdfUploaded byIrvin Martinez
- poincareUploaded byJoseph Zizys
- ACP_PS6_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- Circular Restricted Three Body ModelUploaded bylostkin
- 1011Uploaded bygliptak
- Week 12 ---Impulse+Momentum+ImpactUploaded byiwhy_
- iimmppUploaded byViraj Gaonkar
- 9910012Uploaded bykvilla_4
- Pendu LoUploaded byJavier Vázquez
- Practical Challenges in the Method of Controlled Lagrangians - ChevvaUploaded byleandro_soares2000
- Assignment Four the Navier Stokes EquationsUploaded byAjit Kumar
- Sheppard Thesis MS MathematicsUploaded bysamia
- 1801.00010Uploaded byGuillermo Ramirez
- NOE0415380416%2Ech018Uploaded byUmed Abd-alsatar
- M Dasgupta QFT NotesUploaded byYaj Bhattacharya
- Arun's MHS Physics Sheet 2Uploaded byaoifjofijfsdofiansdfs
- A New Quantization Condition for Parity-Violating Three-dimensional Gravity - Tim BlaisUploaded byTales Fernando
- MSCPhysicsCurriculum2074-01-11.pdfUploaded byBishal Hamal
- SKIMA T4 FIZIK 18.docUploaded bymurni
- Toppled Vehicles During Kumamoto EarthquUploaded byAnonymous rQKN6vV
- 4PH0_2PR_msc_20130822 (1)Uploaded byMahmoud Elsaied Solyman
- An improved calculation of the mass for the resonant spring pendulumUploaded byJuanCruzFortunatti

- ACP_PS9_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_sec1.pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP Revision Lecture.pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_sec5(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS3(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS1_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_sec2(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_sec3(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_sec6(2).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS1(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS2(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS2_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS3_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS4_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS4(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS8_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS5(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS5_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS6(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS6_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS7(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS7_sol(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS9(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers
- ACP_PS8(1).pdfUploaded byRyan Travers

- Planes of Law - MechanusUploaded byLars Davidson
- Deed of Assignment of AtmUploaded byMartin Martel
- Hodges ChargesUploaded byRobert Boyd
- LAW Partnership Act 1932Uploaded byritesh2030
- GO Ms-168-Revised Building Rules-Andhra PradeshUploaded byManvith Reddy Venkat
- Intellectual Property Differs From Physical PropertyUploaded byAngelo J. Comeaux
- CLC Student Law Review Vol II Issue IUploaded byCLCSLR
- Reasons for Delay in Implementation of GSTUploaded byAditya Bansal
- GrievanceUploaded bybgbhattacharya
- Deportation 101 Manual SE ConferenceUploaded byParn Akuma
- Philippine Grid Code Ch 1 2 3_nazareta_ragasUploaded byJayEmJuan
- bmbe lawUploaded bymansikiabo
- FLWG Encampment Guide (2012)Uploaded byCAP History Library
- Peter Suber.pdfUploaded byAndrésFelipeCorreal
- 81. Baens vs. Sempio, Ac No 10378, June 9, 2014Uploaded byMarkus Tran Moralde
- Gsis Family Bank - Thrift Bank vs. Bpi Family Bank, Gr No. 175278, September 23, 2015Uploaded byJerry Serapion
- United States v. Monte Moore, 4th Cir. (2014)Uploaded byScribd Government Docs
- Press vs. Galit DigestUploaded byMarianneVitug
- CAP265 RegulationsUploaded bysherlockking6618
- Investors’ Rights AgreementUploaded byCelan Sergiu
- Studentlawnotes Blogspot Com 2012 12 Place of Suing s15 to 21 Cpc HTMLUploaded byZeesahn
- David R. Hodge Marsha A. Hodge, His Wife, Individually and as Parents and Next Friend of a Minor, Joseph E. Hodge v. M. Alexander Jones, Director of the Carroll County Department of Social Services, in His Official and Individual Capacities Alan L. Katz, Assistant Director of the Carroll County Department of Social Services, in His Official and Individual Capacities Carolyn W. Colvin, Secretary of the Department of Human Resources of the State of Maryland, in Her Official and Individual Capacities, and Carroll County Department of Social Services, 31 F.3d 157, 4th Cir. (1994)Uploaded byScribd Government Docs
- contract licensedUploaded byEriksondhy
- State v. Whitlock, Ariz. Ct. App. (2016)Uploaded byScribd Government Docs
- Nur ChowdhuryUploaded byrhinemine
- 120 Maintenance Cctv Surveillance Systems CopUploaded bywiyah1610
- Topic 6Uploaded bysaherhcc4686
- The Banker & Customer Relationship in IndiaUploaded byNeed Notknow
- Heisinger, Buck & Morris Proposal_RedactedUploaded byL. A. Paterson
- Cir vs. San RoqueUploaded bytynajoydelossantos