You are on page 1of 2

D.

The Lawyer and the Client
Canon 15 – Candor, Fairness and Loyalty in Dealings with Clients
Llunar v. Ricafort, Adm. Case No. 6484, June 16, 2015
Villahermosa, Sr. v. Caracol, A.C. No. 7325 (Resolution), January 21, 2015

Conflict of Interest
Rosacia v. Bulalacao, Adm. Case No. 3745, October 2, 1995
Abaqueta v. Florido, Adm.Case No. 5948. January 22, 2003
Pormento, Sr. v. Pontevedra, Adm. Case No. 5128, March 31, 2005
Pacana vs. Pascual-Lopez, Adm.Case No. 8243. July 24, 2009
Santos Ventura Hocorma Foundation, Inc. v. Funk, Adm.Case No. 9094. August 15, 2012
Bernardino v. Santos, Adm. Case Nos. 10583 & 10584 (Resolution), February 18, 2015
Anglo v. Valencia, Adm. Case No. 10567, February 25, 2015
Mabini Colleges, Inc. v. Pajarillo, Adm. Case No. 10687, July 22, 2015
Gimeno v. Zaide, Adm. Case No. 10303, April 22, 2015

Privileged Communication
Revised Penal Code, Art.209

Canon 16 – Shall Hold in Trust Moneys and Properties of Client
Civil Code, Art. 1491
Licuanan v. Melo, Adm. Case No. 2361, February 9, 1989
Dumadag v. Lumaya, Adm. Case No. 2614. May 21, 1991
Dhaliwal v. Dumaguing, Adm. Case No. 9390. August 1, 2012
Sps Concepcion v. Dela Rosa, Adm. Case No. 10681, February 3, 2015

Champertous contracts
Bautista v. Gonzales, Adm. Matter No. 1625. February 12, 1990

Lien for Attorney’s Fees
Tanhueco v. De Dumo, Adm. Case No. 1437, April 25, 1989

Canon 17 – Fidelity to Client’s Cause
Manalang, et al. v. Angeles, Adm. Case No. 1558, March 10, 2003
Solatan v. Inocentes, Adm. Case No. 6504, August 9, 2005
Villafuerte v. Cortez, Adm. Case No. 3455, April 14, 1998

Canon 18 – Competence and Diligence
Reontoy v. Ibadlit, Adm. Case CBD No. 190, January 28, 1998
Moton v. Cadiao, Adm. Case No. 5169. November 24, 1999
Hernandez v. Padilla, Adm.Case No. 9387. June 20, 2012
Edquibal v. Ferrer, Adm. Case No. 5687, February 3, 2005
Barbuco v. Beltran, Adm. Case No. 5092, August 11, 2004
Suarez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 91133, March 22, 1993
Perea v. Almadro, Adm. Case No. 5246, March 20, 2003
Blanza v. Arcangel, Adm. Case No. 492, September 5, 1967
Nonato v. Fudolin, Jr., Adm. Case No. 10138, June 16, 2015

Canon 19 – Represent With Zeal Within Bounds of Law
Ong v. Unto, Adm. Case No. 2417. February 6, 2002

Canon 20 – Charge Only Fair and Reasonable Fees
Nature of attorney’s fees

. Iledan. Court of Appeals. Court of Appeals. September 29. July 23. 8242. 109219. 86100-03. Nos.R. Sandiganbayan. v. January 18.. 105938. Jr. et al. 134854. L-28078. No. When & where claimed Rules of Court. 124074. G. Figueras. v. 2015 Power of Court to fix attorney’s fees Mendoza-Parker v. L-40424. 191470. Ramotigue. 1971 Obando v. 1997 Attorney’s Lien. 1996 [read also dissenting opinion] Palm v. et al. Adm. Case No. 1980 Aquino v.R. 2007 Domingo v.R.37 Canon 21 – Client Confidence and Secrets Cf RPC Art. March 11. Case No. Casabar. Adm. No. Case No.R. September 20.R. October 10. v. G. 1990 Right to compensation Albano v. G. 1967 Corpuz v. No.R. Case No. 528. January 27. October 11. G. Coloma. Cosme. No. Court of Appeals. G. Adm. Rule 138. 1997 Attorney’s fees as contract and as award for damages Trader’s Royal Bank Employees Union-Independent v. 120592. 7421. 219. 2004 Venterez. March 14. 1994 Retainer’s fee Research and Services Realty.R. G. June 30. April 29. 1954. No. Aquino. 209 Regala. sec. Jr.Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. No.R. Inc. Adm.R. Case No. G. No. January 26. October 2. G. January 23. NLRC. 1962 Gonzaga v. No. Adm. v. Court of Appeals. Villanueva. G. 2009 Canon 22 – Withdrawal of Services for Good Cause and Upon Notice Laput v. 2000 .