You are on page 1of 33

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

)
MOHAN A. HARIHAR, )
)
Appellant )
) Case No. 17-2074
v. )
)
THE UNITED STATES )
)
Defendant )
)

APPELLANT PLEA FOR CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION TO REMOVE

INFERIOR FIRST CIRCUIT JUDGES – TORUELLA, KAYATTA AND BARRON

APPELANT DISCLOSURE

The Appellant respectfully informs this Court that the following Motion was initially filed on

April 16, 2018, in the related Appeal No. 17-1381 – HARIHAR v. US BANK et al. However,

it appears that the Clerk of the Court – Margaret Carter, FAILS STILL to recognize that

Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and Barron HAVE NO JURISDICTION to issue orders

associated with:

1. HARIHAR v.US BANK et al., Appeal No. 1381 (Lower Docket No. 15-cv-11880);

2. HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-2074 (Lower Docket No. 17-cv-

11109) or

3. ANY OTHER related complaint.

1
The law clerks’ duty of confidentiality ends when a clerk believes a federal judge(s) has done

something wrong outside of the deliberative process. The confidentiality guidelines for law

clerks are intended to preserve the judiciary’s integrity. The fundamental goal of the

confidentiality guidelines would be subverted if the rules forced law clerks to be silent about

judicial misconduct. WHEN A JUDGE engages in illegal activities or inappropriate behavior

(as is the case here), that’s clearly NOT what’s intended to be confidential.

On Wednesday, April 25, 2018, the Appellant received via ECF, a LETTER1 from Clerk

Margaret Carter stating the following:

“Dear Mr. Harihar:

I am returning the enclosed document pursuant to the court’s order in 17-1381, Harihar v. US

Bank N.A., et al., dated April 11, 2018. The order directs that no further filings be accepted in

this case. “

Sincerely,

/s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk

The referenced “order” is considered VOID for reasons articulated below (and throughout the

record(s)). Clerk Carters’ conscious decision to remain silent and ignore the evidenced judicial

misconduct claims which CLEARLY impact jurisdiction, shows cause to question her intentions

and ability to perform her duties as Clerk. The Court is respectfully reminded, that Clerk Carter

1 See Attachment F
2
ALREADY stands accused of: MISPRISION OF TREASON 18 U.S. Code § 2382; 18 U.S.

Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States; and ECONOMIC

ESPIONAGE (Economic Espionage Act) 18 U.S. Code § 1831. Her latest decision to continue

ignoring jurisdiction (and other) issues reinforces these claims and further warrants additional

legal action including (but not limited to) her removal as Court Clerk.

Now, the Appellant - Mohan A. Harihar, respectfully re-files this motion, which is a plea for

Congressional intervention warranting (at least in part) the removal of Circuit Judges:

Torruella, Kayatta, Barron and ALSO Clerk Margaret Carter:

After reviewing the VOID order in the related Appeal2 issued on 4/11/18 by Circuit Judges:

Torruella, Kayatta and Barron, the Appellant – Mohan A. Harihar shows cause to: 1.) Fear

for his personal safety and security, 2.) Interpret the VOID order as both MALICIOUS AND

CORRUPT, 3.) Interpret the order as a clear and present danger/threat to our Nation’s

Security and 4.) Inform Congress, the President and DOJ of these evidenced, criminal actions

that warrant removal from the bench. The Circuit Executive (First Circuit) and The

Administrative Offices of US Courts will additionally be updated of this recent activity.

To summarize, since August 2016, the Appellant has evidenced for the record (and in FULL

PUBLIC VIEW) judicial misconduct by TEN (10) Federal (District and Circuit) Court Judges

associated with this litigation and includes First Circuit Chief Judge - Jeffrey R Howard and

2 References Appeal No. 17-1381, HARIHAR v US BANK et al.


3
members of the First Circuit Judicial Council.3 The severity of these evidenced claims

includes (but is not limited to) ruling WITHOUT JURISDICTION (TREASON under

ARTICLE III), ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1832, and perceived

THREATS TO OUR NATION’S SECURITY.

HERE, it is CLEARLY INTERPRETED that Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and

Barron are INFERIOR JUDGES WHO HAVE NO JURISDICTION to rule in this (or ANY

RELATED) litigation. Based on the Appellant’s interpretation of the Law(s), their orders are

considered VOID. The historical record clearly shows that Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta

and Barron have failed to provide A SINGLE VALID ARGUMENT that suggests otherwise.

This Court AND the American Public have now witnessed the following acts of judicial

misconduct – bringing to this Appellant (and likely to ANY OBJECTIVE OBSERVER) a

heightened state of ALERT and OUTRAGE:

1. Continued REFUSAL to address/clarify JURISDICTION issues4;

2. Refusing to clarify the referenced Judgment;

3. Refusing to clarify the referenced Mandate;

4. Refusal(s) to RECUSE;

3
The Appellant references misconduct claims associated with Appeal No. 17-2074, HARIHAR
v THE UNITED STATES (Lower Court Docket No. 17-cv-11109) AND Appeal No 17-1381
HARIHAR v US BANK et al (Lower Docket no. 15-cv-11880).
4
The record shows that the Appellant has filed over FIFTY (50) + court documents which raise
a JURISDICTION issue, ALL of which have been IGNORED by referenced Federal (District
and Circuit) Judges.
4
5. Continuing to issue orders after LOSING JURISDICTION - EACH constituting an act

of TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3 of the Constitution;

6. Refusing to address: a.) the Plaintiff’s Intellectual Property (IP) Rights, b.) Evidenced

ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE claims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1832 and c.) matters

believed to impact National Security;

7. Refusing to exercise judicial discretion by wrongfully denying or unnecessarily delaying

WITHOUT VALID CAUSE - repeated requests for the Court to Assist with the

Appointment of Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915;

8. Refusing to address the EVIDENCED and UNOPPOSED FRAUD on the COURT

claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3);

9. Refusing to address evidenced UNOPPOSED claims of JUDICIAL FRAUD on the

COURT, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) and clear violations to the Judicial Code

of Conduct and Judicial Oath;

10. Refusing to address identified DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS, including (but not

limited to) refusing a TRIAL BY JURY;

11. Ignoring requests for a GRAND JURY;

12. Refusing to address the clearly evidenced IMBALANCE OF HARDSHIPS;

13. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color

of Law;

14. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights;

15. Refusing to address Title 18, U.S.C., Section 1001 Fraud and False Statements;

16. Refusing to address Title 42 Sec. 1983, Civil action for Deprivation of Rights;

5
17. Refusing to address the Plaintiff’s/Appellant’s REPEATED concerns for his personal

SAFETY AND SECURITY;

18. Refusing to promptly reimburse accruing Legal (and other) Fees due to the Appellant, as

stated within the record;

19. Refusing to address DEMAND(S) for CLARIFICATION HEARINGS, with the

presence of an INDEPENDENT COURT REPORTER;

20. Failing to address evidenced argument(s) as FACT – PRIOR to moving to

DISCOVERY and PREMATURELY moving for Dismissal.

EVEN IF the 4/11/18 order (below) was somehow considered valid, its content shows critical

errors warranting further clarification and correction:

“Appellant has filed a series of motions and notices. Because mandate issued in this case on

March 23, 2018, we construe these filings as motions to recall mandate, and deny them. See

Kashner Davidson Securities Corp. v. Mscisz, 601 F.3d 19, 22 (1st Cir. 2010) (mandate will be

recalled "in only the most extraordinary circumstances") (footnote omitted). No further

filings from appellant will be accepted in this appeal.”

First, the Appellant identifies the referenced “motions and notices” as follows:

1. Appellant Notice RE: Letter Delivered to the Administrative Offices of US Courts;

2. Appellant Demand for Clarification of Judgment and Mandate;

3. Appellant Request for STAY of Mandate;

6
4. Appellant Motion to Bring Incremental Claims of Treason Against Circuit Judges

Torruella, Kayatta and Barron;

5. Appellant Notice RE: Intention to File Suit (against referenced Inferior Judges).

Based on the content of each of these referenced documents, it is unclear how these Circuit

Judges, who refuse to even address jurisdiction, could possibly have arrived at their

conclusion(s). Also, with regard to the Appellant’s - Notice to File Suit, it is interpreted that

Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and Barron DO NOT wish to seek a mutual agreement

with the Appellant. Therefore, the Appellant declares that a civil lawsuit will be filed (at

minimum) against these three (3) Circuit Judges. The Appellant will wait to hear back from the

remaining Federal Judges until April 20, 2018, at which time their opportunity to seek mutual

agreement will expire.5

Second, as with prior examples of record, the case reference here appears to be inappropriately

placed, and the Appellant questions exactly which documents of record were reviewed in order

to draw comparison to Kashner Davidson Securities Corp. v. Mscisz.

Third, Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and Barron state, “mandate will be recalled "in

only the most extraordinary circumstances." Based on the historical record that includes

evidence supporting: 1.) lack of jurisdiction; 2.) claims of Treason; 3.) Economic Espionage; and

4.) perceived threats to our Nation’s security, it is unclear where exactly the threshold exists to

reach “extraordinary circumstances.”

5
Since there has been NO RESPONSE from the remaining (referenced) Federal Judges, the
Appellant will now bring a separate civil action, as previously stated.
7
Based on this egregious and continued abuse(s) of authority, the Appellant has initiated the

following legal next steps:

1. The Office of the Circuit Executive has been updated including a supplement to the

judicial misconduct petition which is still pending. There certainly is an expectation for

the Circuit Executive – Susan Goldberg to inform the Administrative Offices of US

Courts of these recent developments6;

2. An update has been provided directly to Director James Duff – Administrative Offices

of US Courts, considering the evidenced claims previously brought against the Clerk’s

Office and the Office of the Circuit Executive7;

3. The President – Donald J. Trump has been updated, considering the insistence to

continue ruling without jurisdiction constitutes incremental acts of Treason under

ARTICLE III. The President has also been informed based on the Appellant’s perceived

concerns to National Security and evidenced claims of Economic Espionage8;

4. A letter has been delivered to the attention of: 1.) US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-

MA), 2.) US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and 3.) US Congresswoman Niki Tsongas

(D-MA) for the purpose of bringing this matter to the immediate attention of the

House/Senate Judiciary Committees. Parties additionally copied on this letter include:

The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Federal Bureau

of Investigation (FBI), and Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA)9.

6 See Attachment A
7 See Attachment B
8 See Attachment C
9 See Attachment D

8
5. A separate letter has been sent to update Assistant US Attorneys - Dina Michael

Chaitowitz and Mary B. Murrane, who are the representing attorneys for The United

States in this Appeal. In this related Appeal, the presiding Circuit Judges: Torruella,

Kayatta and Barron are again considered inferior judges, having demonstrated the

SAME PATTERN OF CORRUPT CONDUCT, including (but not limited to) ruling

without jurisdiction, and refusing to RECUSE. Assistant US Attorneys Chaitowitz and

Murrane have therefore witnessed this misconduct firsthand, and the Appellant is still

waiting for the DOJ to ACT UPON and bring charges for his filed criminal

complaints of record.10

6. 4/22/18 Email to Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA) – requesting official documentation

that articulates the legal steps being taken by the Governor’s Office to address evidenced

claims of Treason.11

In closing, once Congress (or the appropriate legal authority) has appropriately removed Circuit

Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and Barron from the bench, the Appellant (once again)

respectfully requests a TRANSFER to another Circuit WITH Jurisdiction – OR if appropriate

to appear before Congress, so that this litigation can proceed without any further

UNNECESSARY DELAY.

For documentation purposes, after sending a copy of the MOTION to the attention of The

President, confirmation of its receipt is attached (See Attachment H) with the filed Court copy.

10 See Attachment E
11 See Attachment G
9
If there is a question regarding ANY portion of this motion, the Appellant is happy to provide

additional supporting information upon request, in a separate hearing and with the presence of an

independent court reporter.

Respectfully submitted this 26th Day of April, 2018

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

10
Attachment A

11
April 16, 2018

Ms. Anastasia Dubrovsky


Administrative Attorney
United States Courts for The First Circuit
1 Courthouse Way Suite 3700
Boston, MA 02210

RE: Supplement to Petition under Review of Judicial Misconduct


Complaint No. 01-17-90021, 01-17-90011 thru 01-17-90018, and Show
Cause Order.

Dear Ms. Dubrovsky:

Since filing the referenced Judicial Misconduct Petition with


the Judicial Council (delivered March 19, 2018), continued and
deliberate actions by INFERIOR Circuit Judges: Torruella,
Kayatta and Barron warrant: 1.) this supplement to the original
judicial misconduct petition and 2.) initiating next legal steps
for their removal from the bench.
Attached, please find a copy of the following Motion filed
Sunday, April 15, 2018 - APPELLANT PLEA FOR CONGRESSIONAL
INTERVENTION TO REMOVE INFERIOR FIRST CIRCUIT JUDGES – TORUELLA,
KAYATTA AND BARRON (See Attachment A).
Please be advised, it has recently become necessary to file a
formal complaint(s) with the Administrative Offices of US Courts
- revealing an evidenced BREAKDOWN in the First Circuit’s
process for handling judicial misconduct complaints. Criminal
complaints are also filed with the FBI against ALL responsible
parties.12 The Complainant believes that there MAY exist an
opportunity here for the Office of the Circuit Executive to
initiate corrective action by re-affirming this referenced
breakdown in process with the Administrative Office of US
Courts. Conversely, any failure to do so will only add to
existing claims which include (but are not limited to): 1.)
MISPRISION OF TREASON 18 U.S. Code § 2382; 2.) 18 U.S. Code §
371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States;
and 3.) ECONOMIC ESPIONAGE (Economic Espionage Act) 18 U.S. Code
§ 1831.
While this Judicial Misconduct Petition is still pending, EVEN
IF jurisdiction were somehow re-established, the Complainant has
evidenced a PATTERN of CORRUPT CONDUCT warranting either: 1.) a
TRANSFER to a different Circuit WITH Jurisdiction, or 2.)

12Parties include: 1.) referenced Federal (District and Circuit)


Judges who are considered INFERIOR; 2.) Referenced Officers of
the Court within the Clerk’s Office and the Office of the
Circuit Executive.
12
considering the severity of issues and perceived impact to
National Security, addressing directly before Congress.
The Complainant respectfully requests that the Circuit Executive
– Susan Goldberg, provide for the record: 1.) a written response
stating her intentions to inform the Administrative Office of US
Courts of this referenced breakdown (as required), and 2.) the
Circuit Executive’s intentions to inform ALL OTHER appropriate
offices/agencies moving forward.

Respectfully Submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar
Complainant/Plaintiff

13
Attachment B

14
April 15, 2018

Administrative Office of the United States Courts


Attn: Director James C. Duff
One Columbus Circle, NE
Washington, D.C. 20544

RE: FIRST CIRCUITS’ CONTINUED PATTERN OF CORRUPT CONDUCT WARRANTS


CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION

Dear Director Duff,

After filing a complaint with your office on 4/2/18, it becomes necessary to inform you of
NEW/INCREMENTAL criminal misconduct claims. In my original complaint, I brought to
your attention: 1.) An evidenced pattern of corrupt conduct within the First Circuit Judiciary
and 2.) A breakdown in the process of addressing AND holding accountable evidenced judicial
misconduct. On Wednesday, April 11, 2018, First Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and
Barron issued an order associated with Appeal No. 17-1381, HARIHAR v. US BANK et al.13

For reasons CLEARLY articulated within the record, Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and
Barron have NO JURISDICTION to rule here. They are considered INFERIOR Judges.
Their insistence to blatantly continue ignoring: 1.) their Judicial Oath, 2.) the Constitution and
3.) other Federal Laws has called for informing the Office of the First Circuit Executive and
filing a supplement to the (pending) judicial misconduct petition.

There are again red flags with regard to the Clerk’s Office, specifically with Clerk Margaret
Carter, whose signature is attached to the 4/11/18 order. Clerk Carter is well aware that inferior
Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and Barron have NO JURISDICTION to rule here. Yet,
it appears (at least on its surface) that Clerk Carter MAY be colluding/conspiring with referenced
officers of the court in order to reach a corrupt and pre-determined outcome. Based on the

13 See Attachment
15
historical record, it is UNLIKELY that Clerk Carter has reported this latest act of TREASON to
the Circuit Executive – Susan Goldberg, or to your office.

This egregious and continued abuse(s) of authority brings a perceived threat to me personally,
and to our Nation’s security. Legal steps MUST now be taken to remove these referenced
Inferior Judges from the Bench. Attached, please find a copy of the following motion filed
electronically with the Court on Sunday, April 15, 2018: “APPELLANT PLEA FOR
CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION TO REMOVE INFERIOR FIRST CIRCUIT
JUDGES – TORUELLA, KAYATTA AND BARRON.” 14

Please be advised, a copy of this letter will be included as an attachment with the FILED copy
of the above referenced motion.

If there is disagreement or question with ANY singular claim brought against the referenced
parties, please articulate exactly which documents of record were reviewed in order to reach your
conclusion. I am happy to provide you with additional supporting information upon request.
After review, I respectfully request that you provide a written response regarding your intentions
and legal next steps moving forward.

Thank you for your attention to this very serious matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Mohan A. Harihar

14 See Attachment
16
Attachment C

17
A LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

April 16, 2018

President Donald J. Trump


The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20500

RE: FORMAL MEETING REQUEST – HARIHAR FCS PRESENTATION

Dear President Trump,

As you know, I have been updating the White House regularly regarding egregious abuses of
authority exemplified by First Circuit (District and Appellate Court) Judges associated with the
following litigation:
1. HARIHAR v. US BANK et al, Appeal No, 17-1381 (Lower Court Docket No. 15-cv-
11880); and
2. HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-2074 (Lower Court Docket No.
17-cv-11109)

These evidenced abuses include (but are not limited to) INFERIOR Judges who appear insistent
on issuing orders when they have NO JURISDICTION. By doing so, these actions constitute
act(s) of TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3. As required by Federal Law, I have
informed the White House following each evidenced act of treason. I have also followed the
process for filing a judicial misconduct complaint(s), to no avail. The same pattern of corrupt
conduct continues to be evidenced, indicating a BROKEN PROCESS that now warrants
communication directly with Director James Duff – Administrative Office of US Courts and
Criminal complaints filed with the FBI.
The most recent incident occurred just a few days ago on Wednesday, April 11, 2018, with an
order issued by Circuit Judges:

18
1. Juan R. Torruella;
2. William J. Kayatta, Jr.; and
3. David J. Barron

I’ve attached a copy of my response for your review, as I believe these continued abuses pose a
DOMESTIC threat to our Nation, warranting their immediate removal from the Bench.15
Since the removal of a Federal Judge can only be initiated by Congress, I have (as a matter of
record) regularly informed my Congressional leaders here in Massachusetts,
SPECIFICALLY – US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), US Senator Ed Markey (D-
MA) and US Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (D-MA). Governor Charlie Baker (R-MA) has
also been regularly updated. There is a CLEAR EXPECTATION for these members of
Congress to show a sense of urgency in bringing this matter to the attention of the House/Senate
Judiciary committees. Any failure to do so will certainly raise more red flags.

Mr. President, there is much more at stake here. Aside from the obvious ramifications resulting
from a corrupt judiciary, there exists evidenced claims against these officers of the Court
indicating violations to: 1.) 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud
the United States and 2.) Economic Espionage, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831.

You are certainly aware of the ongoing issues involving Intellectual Property (IP) Rights in our
Country. The referenced Intellectual Property/Trade Secret which I created, the “HARIHAR
FCS MODEL,” proposes a framework that addresses ongoing issues that continue to plague our
country – Illegal Foreclosures, Mortgage Servicing abuses and the resulting damages suffered by
millions of Americans, including myself. As recently as December 2017, you’ve expressed your
opinion towards “cheaters” such as (Defendant/Appellee) Wells Fargo’s for their evidenced
mortgage servicing (and other) abuses. In current headlines it appears the CFPB is preparing to
issue severe penalties against one of the biggest cheaters in banking.

15 See Attachment
19
But that isn’t enough. Mr. President, I am respectfully requesting to have a formal meeting with
you, and Attorney General Sessions to discuss the legal matter at hand, including an expanded
presentation of the referenced Intellectual Property. Once properly implemented as intended,
the HARIHAR FCS Model is designed to assist the wrongfully foreclosed homeowner
WHILE (conservatively) delivering over $5T in economic growth to our Nation - ALL
without the need of a single tax dollar or new legislation.16 As the leader of our great Nation, I
certainly realize the many important issues you address on a daily basis and appreciate your
consideration.

Thank you, Mr. President. I look forward to your response with great anticipation.

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

16
The HARIHAR FCS model has been previously presented with MERIT to: 1.) The EOP
(former Obama Administration) per the specific request of VP Joe Biden; 2.) Deputy Chief
Counsel (Former) – Gail Laster, House Financial Services Committee; 3.) Senior Economic
Advisor to US Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) – Bruno Freitas; 4.) The Office of US
Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (D-MA); 5.) The State AG offices of MA and NH; and to
CEO Larry Rasky (Rasky Partners, Inc.) who leads one of the largest and most respected
independent public relations and public affairs firms in the nation.
20
Attachment D

21
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:54 PM
Subject: Request for Congressional Intervention to Remove Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and Barron
To: elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov, mark_bayer@markey.senate.gov,
mark_gallagher@markey.senate.gov, june.black@mail.house.gov
Cc: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
christina.sterling@usdoj.gov, "Constituent.services@state.ma.us" <constituent.services@state.ma.us>,
mary.murrane@usdoj.gov

Dear Senator Warren, Senator Markey and Congresswoman Tsongas,

As a resident of the Commonwealth and an American-born citizen of The United States, the purpose of this
email is to inform you of: 1.) A continuing PATTERN of CORRUPT CONDUCT within the First Circuit
Federal Judiciary, and 2.) A BROKEN PROCESS for addressing judicial misconduct.

For several years now, your offices have been regularly updated on litigation that I am personally involved with:

1. HARIHAR v. US BANK et al, Appeal No. 17-1381 (Lower Court Docket No. 15-cv-11880); and
2. HARIHAR v. THE UNITED STATES, Appeal No. 17-2074 (Lower Court Docket No. 17-cv-1110

You are aware that the primary issues to these complaints involve: 1.) Illegal Foreclosure and 2.) The
Misappropriation of a Trade Secret/Intellectual Property (IP) Rights. This referenced IP was designed to
bring substantial economic benefit to the Nation while at the same time assisting the Illegally Foreclosed
Homeowner. Senator Warren, you are aware that I have personally presented this Trade Secret to your Senior
Economic Advisor - Bruno Freitas, who STRONGLY RECOMMENDED that I present to you directly. It is
unclear - especially considering your claimed stance against Wall Street, why you've IGNORED multiple
meeting requests. Congresswoman Tsongas - Similarly, you are aware that I favorably presented this
framework to your former - Director, Brian Martin, in OUR hometown of Lowell, MA. It is unclear why you too
have ignored repeated requests for assistance.

Now however - as evidenced by the record, the actions by Circuit Judges: Torruella, Kayatta and Barron,
pose a perceived and considerable threat to our Nation's security. At minimum, I have evidenced for the record,
claims supporting: 1.) TREASON under ARTICLE III, Section 3, for ruling WITHOUT JURISDICTION, 2.) 18
U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States and 3.) Economic
Espionage, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831. Please note - these allegations, in their entirety, stand UNOPPOSED.

The severity of these evidenced claims has called for the following actions:

1. Informing the President of The United States, particularly with evidenced acts of Treason and
Economic Espionage;
2. Filing Criminal complaints with the FBI;
3. Updating the Office of the Circuit Executive;
4. Informing the Director to the Administrative Office of US Courts - James Duff;
5. Updating the DOJ and the US Attorney's Office (MA). Please be advised, in the litigation involving The
United States as an Appellee, representing counsel - Assistant US Attorneys - Dina Michael Chaitowitz and
Mary B. Murrane have personally witnessed these referenced allegations, including TREASON, firsthand.

As MY Congressional leaders, I am respectfully requesting that you bring this matter before Congress,
specifically, the House/Senate Judiciary committees for the purpose of removing these accused officers
from the bench. Attached, please find a copy of the Response to the April 11, 2018 (VOID)
order: APPELLANT PLEA FOR CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION TO REMOVE INFERIOR FIRST

22
CIRCUIT JUDGES – TORUELLA, KAYATTA AND BARRON. Please be advised, a copy of this email will
be attached in the FILED court copy of the response. A copy will also be made available to the PUBLIC,
for documentation purposes and out of concerns for my personal safety and security.

Thank you, in advance for your assistance with this urgent matter.

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
mo.harihar@gmail.com

cc

The Executive Office of The President (EOP)


US Inspector General - Michael Horowitz
US Attorney General - Jeff Sessions
Governor Charley Baker, (D-MA)
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

23
Attachment E

24
--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:02 PM
Subject: Request for DOJ Timeline to Bring Referenced Criminal Charges
To: mary.murrane@usdoj.gov
Cc: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov, mark_bayer@markey.senate.gov,
mark_gallagher@markey.senate.gov, june.black@mail.house.gov, christina.sterling@usdoj.gov,
"Constituent.services@state.ma.us" constituent.services@state.ma.us

Dear Assistant US Attorney Murrane,

This letter is respectfully delivered to inform you of a development in the related Appeal No. 17-1381,
HARIHAR v. US BANK et al. As with this Appeal involving the United States, presiding Circuit Judges:
Torruella, Kayatta and Barron have ignored the evidenced claims of misconduct brought against them,
including jurisdiction issues. Their insistence to ignore these evidenced claims and continue ruling in BOTH
Appeals WITHOUT JURISDICTION has brought TREASON claims against them under ARTICLE III,
Section 3. As representing counsel for The United States, you have witnessed these acts of Treason,
Economic Espionage (and other related crimes) firsthand. Collectively, the PATTERN OF CORRUPT
CONDUCT exemplified by this First Circuit has become so egregious, Congressional intervention is warranted
out of concerns that include (but are not limited to) National Security, and a legal effort is being made to
REMOVE these referenced Judges from the Bench.

Attached, please find a copy of the filed RESPONSE to the (VOID) Court Order issued on April 11, 2018 for
Appeal No. 17-1381. In this filed response, please be sure to also review the attached correspondences
delivered to the following offices/agencies:

1. Office of the First Circuit Executive - to the attention of Circuit Executive Susan Goldberg;
2. Administrative Office of US Courts - to the attention of Director James Duff;
3. Executive Office of the President - to the attention of President Donald J. Trump;
4. Congressional Offices of US Senators - Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Ed Markey (D-MA) and US
Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (D-MA)

Both you and co-counsel, Assistant US Attorney Dina M. Chaitowitz are well-aware that Criminal Complaints
are filed with the FBI against these referenced officers of the Court, and ALL related offenders. For the
record, please provide a detailed update as to when your office is expected to bring charges for these
evidenced criminal claims.

Please be advised, for documentation purposes, a copy of this email will be attached in the filed response
referenced above. A copy will also be made available to the PUBLIC, out of continued concerns for my
personal safety and security.

Thank you for your attention to this serious matter.

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant

25
Attachment F

26
27
Attachment G

28
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mohan Harihar <moharihar@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 12:55 PM
Subject: Formal Request for Documented Response from Gov. Charlie Baker (R-MA) RE: Evidenced
TREASON Claims
To: "Constituent.services@state.ma.us" <constituent.services@state.ma.us>
Cc: NewYorkComplaints Dojoig <dojoig.newyorkcomplaints@usdoj.gov>, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
boston@ic.fbi.gov, elizabeth_warren@warren.senate.gov, scheduling@warren.senate.gov, sydney_levin-
epstein@markey.senate.gov, june.black@mail.house.gov, mary.murrane@usdoj.gov,
christina.sterling@usdoj.gov

Dear Governor Baker,

This email is respectfully delivered to your direct attention following a phone call I received from your office on
Friday, April 20, 2018 at approximately 3:50pm. Earlier that day, I placed a call to your office requesting an
update regarding: 1.) Evidenced acts of TREASON that were brought to your attention and 2.) What action(s) is
being taken to address these very serious, CRIMINAL allegations. My conversation was with someone within
your office named Nicholas (no last name given).

Governor Baker, as you know, I have been regularly updating your office for several years now (via US Mail
and email communication), to inform you of egregious judicial misconduct evidenced by the FIRST CIRCUIT
Federal Judiciary. Specifically, as it relates to ongoing litigation addressing (in part) ILLEGAL
FORECLOSURE that I am personally involved with - HARIHAR v US BANK et al (Appeal No. 17-1381) and
HARIHAR v THE UNITED STATES (Appeal No. 17-2074). The most serious of these evidenced claims, has
been RULING WITHOUT JURISDICTION, which is considered an act of TREASON under ARTICLE III,
Section 3 of the US Constitution. From my interpretation of Federal Law, ANY AMERICAN who has
witnessed an act of Treason MUST report it to the President, another Judge or to the Governor of his/her
state. Aside from informing your office (and the Court) of these very serious crimes, the following
offices/agencies have similarly been informed:

1. The FBI - Criminal complaints are formally filed against ALL referenced Officers of the Court;
2. A PLEA for Congressional Intervention has been officially made to the offices of US Senator Elizabeth
Warren (D-MA), US Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and US Congresswoman Niki Tsongas (D-MA);
3. The DOJ/US Attorney's Office (MA) - Specifically, Asst. US Attorneys - Mary Murrane and Dina M.
Chaitowitz, who have also witnessed FIRSTHAND, these evidenced acts of Treason;
4. The Administrative Office of US Courts - Specifically, Director James C. Duff;
5. The White House - Specifically, President Donald J. Trump;
6. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) - Specifically, IG Michael Horowitz.

To be clear, my request here IS NOT for you to interfere in any way with ongoing litigation, OR to give
any form of legal advice. I have however, reported directly to your attention, a severe crime(s) as is my
obligation under Federal Law. A legal effort is now being made to REMOVE these referenced INFERIOR
judges from the bench, so that the litigation can proceed without any further, unnecessary delay. In my
conversation with Nicholas on Friday, I verbally requested a documented response detailing legal action being
taken by your office in this matter. Nicholas said any such request must be made in writing. Therefore, with
this email communication, I respectfully request that you provide a TIMELY response for the record -
NO LATER THAN WEDNESDAY, APRIL 25, 2018, stating what action(s) your office is taking, after being
officially notified of evidenced acts of Treason. Please be advised, for documentation purposes, copies of
this communication are delivered to the offices/agencies listed above. A copy will also be made available to the
PUBLIC, out of concerns for MY personal safety and security.

29
Thank you, Governor Baker for your time in addressing this very serious matter.

GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

Respectfully,

Mohan A. Harihar
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
617.921.2526 (Mobile)
mo.harihar@gmail.com

30
Attachment H

31
32
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 26, 2018 I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court
using the CM/ECF System, which will send notice of such filing to the following registered
CM/ECF users:

Assistant US Attorney Mary Murrane


Assistant US Attorney Dina M. Chaitowitz

Mohan A. Harihar
Appellant
7124 Avalon Drive
Acton, MA 01720
Mo.harihar@gmail.com

33