Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Needs
In the Herzberg model, pay is viewed primarily as a hygiene factor, although it may have
atleast short-term motivational value as well. In the other need-based models, pay is most easily
seen in its capacity to satisfy the lower order needs (such as Maslow's physiological and security
needs or Alderfer's existence needs). However, we can easily see how it relates to other levels as
well.
Expectancy
Expectancy theory states that: Valence x Expectance x Instrumentality =
Motivation.
This means that if money is to act as a strong motivation, an employee must want more
of it (valence), must believe that effort will be successful in producing desired performance
(expectancy), and must trust that the monetary reward will follow better performance
(instrumentality). Value of money is not easily influenced by mangement. It is contingent upon an
employee's personal values, experience, and needs as well as the macromotivational
environment.
Comparable worth also seeks to guarantee equal pay for equal work. This approach demands
that reward system be designed so that in comparable jobs-- those of equal value to the
employer-- receive similar levels of pay.
Other Factors
Secrecy in pay programs is sometimes subject to debate. Some organizations guard all
information about compensaton from employees; others freely share it in the belief that openness
is preferable.
Control can also be an issue. Should reward system be designed by staff experts, or
should employees be allowed to participate in their creation and governance?
Flexibility , even though some clothing products claim "one size fits all", to expect that all
dimensions of compensation will meet the needs of all employees may not be reasonable.
1. Objective selling - joint determination by the manager and employee of appropriate levels of
future performance by the employee, within the contsxt of overall unit goals and resources. These
objectives often set for the next calendar year.
2. Action planning - participative or even independent planning by the employee as to how to
reach those objectives. Providing some autonomy to employees is invaluable; they are more
likely to use their ingenuity, as well as feel more committed to plan's success.
3. Periodic reviews - joint assessment of progress toward objectives by manager and employee,
performed informally and sometimes spontaneously.
4. Annual evaluation - ,ore formal assessement of success in achieving the employees annual
objectives, coupled with a renewal of the planning cycle.
The MBO approach overcomes some of the problems that arise as a result of assuming that the
employee traits needed for job success can be reliably identified and measured. Instead of
assuming traits, the MBO method concentrates on actual outcomes. If the employee meets or
exceeds the set objectives, then he or she has demonstrated an acceptable level of job
performance. Employees are judged according to real outcomes, and not on their potential for
success, or on someone’s subjective
opinion of their abilities. The guiding principle of the MBO approach is that direct results can be
observed, whereas the traits and attributes of employees (which may or may not contribute to
performance) must be guessed at or inferred.
Performance appraisal plays a key role in reward system. It is the process of evaluating the
performance of employees, sharing that information with them, and searching for ways to improve
their performance. Appraisal is necessary in order to (1) allocate resource in a dynamic
environment, (2) motivate and reward employees, (3) give employees feedback about their work,
(4) maintain fair relationships within groups, (5) coach and develop employees, and (6) comply
woth regulations. It is also a formal opportunity to do what should e done much more frequently in
organizations-- express appreciation for employee contributions.
Appraisal Philosophy
A generation ago, appraisal programs tended to emphasoze employee traits,
deficiencies, and abilities, but modern appraisal philosophy emphasizes present performance and
future goals. Modern philosophy also stresses employee participation in mutually setting goals
with the supervisor and knowledge of results.
Hallmark of Appraisal Philosophy are as follows:
•Performance orientation- it is not enough for employees to put forth effort; that effort must result
in the attainment of desired outcomes.
•Focus on goals or objectives
•Mutual goal setting between supervisor and employees
•Clarofocation of behavioral expectations
•Extensive feedback systems
Suggested Approaches, appraisal interviews are more likely to be successful when the
appraiser:
•Is knowlegeable about the employee's job
•Has previously set measurable perforamance standards
•Has gathered specific avidence frequently about performance
•Seeks and uses inputs from other observers in the organization
•Sharply limits the amount of criticism to a few major items
•Provides support, acceptance and praise for task well done
•Listen actively to the employee's input and reactions
•Shares responsibility for outcomes and offers future assistance
•Allows participation in the discussion
Advantages
•Strengthen instrumentality beliefs
•Create perceptions of equity
•Reinforce desirable behaviors
•Provide objectib\ve basis for rewards
Disadvantages
•Cost
•System complexity
•Declining or variable pay
•Union resistance
•Delay in receipt
Wage incentives which are a form of merit pay, provide more pay for more production. Workers
under normal conditions without wage incentives have the capacity to produce more, and wage
incentives are one way to release that potential.
Lump sum payments (such as sales commissions) is another traditional method. It is not added
to base pay. Usually the formula and the relationship between performance and the payment of
the lump sum are known beforehand.
Sales commissions may often have little to do with performance because factorssuch as
product quality, brand name and price may contribute more to sales than the abilityto convince
buyers. Appraisals are less significant to this category where the criteria (e.g.sales figures) are
statistical and no further measurement is needed.
Rate setting is the process of determining the standard output for each job, which becomes fair
days work for the operator.
Loose rates is when employees are able to reach standard output with less than normal effort.
Payments at a rate that allows employees to reach standard output with less&-than&-normal
effort.
Output Restriction is the situation in which workers choose to produce less than they could
produce with nornal effort.
The profit sharing plans are based on predetermined economic sharing rules that define the split
of gains between the company as a principal and the employee as an agent. For example,
suppose the profits are x, which might be a random variable. Before knowing the profits, the
principal and agent might agree on a sharing rule s
Gain sharing is another useful group incentive. It establishes a historical base period of
organizational performance, measures improvements and sharea the gains with employees on
some formula basis. Gainsharing is a program that returns cost savings to the employees, usually
as a lump-sum bonus. It is a productivity measure, as opposed to profit-sharing which is a
profitability measure.
Skill-Based pay also called knowledge-based pay or multiskill pay rewards individuals
for what they know how to do. Employees are paid for the range, depth, and types of skills in
which they demonstrate capabilities. Skill-based pay refers to a system which promotes
workforce flexibility by rewarding individuals based on the number, type and depth of skills
acquired, mastered and applied.
Fundamentals
of
Human Resource
Management
Appraising
and
Rewarding
Performance
Submitted by:
Calingasan, Irene Grace
BSBA Financial Management
Submitted to:
Prof. Palileo