Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D
taining one or more disordered 2D impurities
oping—the judicious inclusion of im- magnetic fields, and the response of the system characterized by area Ad, relative permittivity
purities into a material, with the aim of in general differs from that of a homogeneous ed, and permeability md: By solving the pertinent
controlling the material’s macroscopic body with effective macroscopic parameters eeff boundary value problem [see supplementary note
parameters—has been essential in the and meff. 1 (25)], we found that all fields excited external to
development of the semiconductor indus- Traditionally, it is only in the long-wavelength the ENZ body in a generic 2D scattering scenario
try (1). Arguably, the success of semiconductor regime that a body filled with impurities can be with the magnetic field polarized along the z axis
devices lies largely in the possibility of engi- substituted with a homogenized body by using (i.e., perpendicular to the 2D plane) are identical
neering their electrical, optical, and/or mag- suitable effective-medium theories (EMTs) (10). to those of a homogeneous ENZ body with effective
netic properties with a relatively small number Conventional EMTs apply usually under three relative permeability and permittivity given by
of randomly located impurities. For instance, conditions: The original body must contain a suf- X
tailoring the electrical conductivity via doping ficiently large number of impurities, and both their meff ¼ 1 þ Dmd ; eeff ¼ 0 ð1Þ
d
facilitated the development of diodes and tran- size and separation must be much smaller than
sistors, which are the basis of microelectronics the wavelength of operation (10). Although these where the variation of the effective relative per-
(2). Different doping mechanisms are also central conditions are actually relaxed in advanced homog- meability induced by the dth impurity is given by
to a number of optical and optoelectronic de- enization techniques (11, 12), these processes break
1h i
vices, including lasers, light-emitting diodes, and
solar cells (3).
down and inevitably lose their physical meaning
as the size of the impurities increases and their
Dmd ¼
A ∫ Ad
yd ðrÞdA−Ad ð2Þ
Here, yd ðrÞ is the magnetic field distribution with- dian frequency and c is the vacuum speed of but, on the contrary, enhances the local electric
in the impurity, normalized such that yd ðrÞ ¼ 1 light). field at the position of the emitter, thus acceler-
on its boundary [see supplementary note 1 (25)]. This dopant presents a clear resonant behavior ating the radiation process. In general, PMC
Dmd is solely determined by the properties of the at J0(kdrd) = 0: To illustrate this point, Fig. 2 de- bodies are of great interest as they exhibit opaque
2D dopant (i.e., its cross-sectional geometry and picts the effective permeability of an arbitrarily high-impedance surfaces (26), empowering effi-
constitutive parameters) and the overall area of shaped 2D ENZ body of cross-sectional area cient emission, perfect absorption, and direc-
the host. In other words, Dmd is independent of A ¼ 2l20 , containing a single 2D dielectric rod tional scattering with a planar profile.
the external geometry of the ENZ host’s cross- impurity (md = 1, ed = 10), as a function of the Above resonance, the effective permeabil-
sectional shape, as well as the position of and the rod radius rd. At resonance, we get meff → 1, and ity becomes negative and eventually crosses zero.
interaction between the impurities within it. the fields excited outside the body are identical At this point, the fields excited outside the body
Macroscopic 2D particles immersed in a 2D ENZ to those excited by a perfect magnetic conduc- are identical to those of an epsilon-and-mu-near-
body therefore play a role analogous to that of tor (PMC) body. This implies, for example, that zero (EMNZ) body (meff ≈ 0, eeff ≈ 0). EMNZ
electronic dopants, in the sense that they affect the fields excited by a 2D emitter located in the bodies provide interesting wave physics associ-
the macroscopic photonic response of the whole vicinity of the doped body are primarily reflected ated with a zero-index behavior while being
body in an additive manner. by it (Fig. 2C), such that the emission is directed impedance-matched to free space for normal
The effective permittivity of the host is un- into a single half-space (Fig. 2C, right). Further- incidence (7). As shown in Fig. 2D, this results in
changed by the presence of dopants—that is, eeff = more, in contrast to good (electric) conducting enhanced transmission through the body (Fig.
0 [see supplementary note 1 (25)]. We emphasize materials, the electric field on the surface of the 2D, center), as well as in the formation of
that meff, as defined in Eq. 1, is not an approxima- PMC body is not zero but maximized. Therefore, highly directive beams perpendicular to the
tion obtained, for example, via field averaging. the reflection from the body does not inhibit sides of the body (Fig. 2D, right). These features
On the contrary, in the ENZ limit, meff (and the
of EMNZ media have been exploited in the past could also be dynamically tuned between these a separation in the z axis of h = l0/2 at the fre-
to achieve directive emission (7, 17), geometry- or other cases by changing the rod’s permittivity quency of operation w0 = 2p × 2.376 × 109 rad/s.
invariant tunneling (27), and anomalous and/or radius. In this manner, the properties of This causes the empty test region to be at the
scattering properties (28). the entire body, potentially spanning several wave- cutoff frequency for the TE10 mode, which is
The numerical simulations reported in Fig. 2 lengths, would be controlled with a single small known to exhibit ENZ properties (15). The input
illustrate an excellent agreement between the actuator with an arbitrary location. More im- and output waveguides are filled with dielectric
responses of PMC and EMNZ media and their portantly, although conventional metamaterials materials (ediel = 2) so that they can function
implementations via photonic doping. Small de- (typically based on periodic structures) have dif- above the TE10 cutoff. These waveguides have a
viations are due to numerical accuracy only, as ficulty maintaining the validity of the effective width of l0/3 such that they are monomodal
the result is exact for ideal material parameters parameters on complex geometries (e.g., when across the frequency range of the experiment.
[see supplementary note 1 (25)]. A parametric the local curvature of a boundary becomes com- To demonstrate the geometry-invariant prop-
analysis of the effect of losses on the excited fields parable to the size of the unit cells composing the erties of EMNZ tunneling, as well as the posi-
is reported in fig. S2. Moderate losses [Im(e) < metamaterial), our methodology provides a path- tion independence and geometry invariance
0.03] do not have a dramatic influence, primarily way to the design of PMC and EMNZ bodies with of photonic doping, we tested three different
resulting in dampened scattered fields while a intricate or even deformable surfaces. cavity geometries and three separate dielec-
similar spatial distribution is maintained. The We provide an experimental proof-of-concept tric rod locations within each geometry, giving
results are also independent of the position of demonstration of photonic doping by implement- a total of nine different experiments. All struc-
the rod, as shown in figs. S3 and S4 (25), for the ing EMNZ tunneling (27) at microwave frequen- tures have the same cross-sectional area of
lossless and lossy cases, respectively. The exter- cies. The advantages of this approach are twofold: 1.37l0 × 1.37l0: The first cavity (Fig. 3A, top) is
nal fields are independent of the positions of the First, the experimental demonstration is carried characterized by a simple rectangular geome-
impurities; hence, an external observer (who only out in a closed and controlled environment. Second, try, and the ports are located to conform a 90°
Fig. 3. Experimental demonstration of EMNZ tunneling facilitated via photonic vance. (C) Measurement of the magnitude, jS21 j, and phase, PhaseðS21 Þ, of the
doping. (A) Photograph and sketch of the experimental setup: three different EMNZ transmission coefficient of the three cavities (red, blue, and magenta) and in each
regions (waveguide-at-cutoff–based ENZ structure with a dielectric rod as the do- cavity for the three different locations (solid, dashed, and dotted lines) of the di-
pant) connected with input and output waveguides. Each cavity contains three electric dopant. A peak of transmission with zero-phase crossing is consistently
possible locations for a dopant consisting of a circular dielectric rod. (B) Snapshot of observed in all configurations and pinned to the same EMNZ frequency, dem-
the numerically predicted magnetic field in the middle plane in each cavity (z = h/2, onstrating geometry-invariant EMNZ tunneling, as well as position-independent and
where h is the waveguide height), illustrating full transmission with zero phase ad- geometry-invariant photonic doping. w, radian frequency of the input signal.
relative permittivity ed = 9, designed to induce an zero-crossing in phase for all nine cases. This is magnetic contribution Dmd ¼ ed ðpA2d Þ= ð2Al20 Þ,
EMNZ behavior at the frequency of operation. To an unequivocal signature of geometry-invariant as the filling factor f approaches one, the ef-
avoid the excitation of additional modes (29), we EMNZ tunneling, in which a large physical vol- fective permeability exhibits only a small para-
surrounded the perimeter of the dielectric rod with ume that would have otherwise influenced the magnetic effect: meff → 1 þ ed Ad =ð2l20 Þ, with
16 conductive (3.18-mm copper) wires, as shown electromagnetic wave propagation externally be- Ad =l20 ≪ 1. As shown in Fig. 4, this implies that
in Fig. 3A. Details of the operation and assembly haves as a “single point” electromagnetically, as it is possible to densely dope an ENZ host with-
of the wires can be found in supplementary note viewed from the external world (27). The frequen- out affecting its macroscopic response to electro-
5 and figs. S8 and S9 (25). cy shift observed in the transmission coefficient magnetic fields. In the most extreme conceptual
First, we numerically analyzed the experimen- is ascribed to small inaccuracies in the rod per- case, one could envision filling the ENZ body
tal setup with a commercial full-wave numerical mittivity value and/or the imperfect fabrication of with a fractal distribution such that the area of
solver (30). Figure 3B represents snapshots of the wire mesh. Figure 3C also includes the meas- the host asymptotically approaches zero (but
the numerically predicted magnetic field in the ured transmission coefficients in the absence of the ENZ region is still connected) while having
middle plane (z = h/2) within the structure when the dielectric rod (black solid line), for which the no effect on its electromagnetic response at the
it is illuminated by a wave coming from one of transmission peak disappears. This ratifies that ENZ frequency. From a more practical perspec-
the ports. Regardless of the shape of the EMNZ the tunneling effect does not occur because of tive, this finding suggests the possibility of
section and the location of the dielectric rod, ENZ tunneling [which only takes place for small engineering the mechanical and/or thermal
the EMNZ behavior is preserved with resonant waveguide cross sections (8)] or any other resonant properties of a device (e.g., by using a porous
transmission and almost no phase progression effect related to the shape of the cavities. From material) without affecting its electromagnetic
through the structure. The predicted magnetic a practical standpoint, this result demonstrates response at the ENZ frequency.
field is uniform in phase and amplitude across that the effective permeability and scattering Many other phenomena might emerge in the
the structure in all cases, despite the relatively properties of a large, arbitrarily shaped ENZ superdense doping regime. For instance, if the
directly translated to arbitrary 3D systems. How- 6. G. V. Eleftheriades, K. G. Balmain, Negative-Refraction Metamaterials: 26. D. Sievenpiper, Z. Lijun, R. F. J. Broas, N. G. Alexopoulos,
ever, these concepts can be implemented and Fundamental Principles and Applications (Wiley, 2005). E. Yablonovitch, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47,
7. R. W. Ziolkowski, Phys. Rev. E 70, 046608 (2004). 2059–2074 (1999).
measured in 3D physical systems in which the 8. M. Silveirinha, N. Engheta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 157403 27. A. M. Mahmoud, N. Engheta, Nat. Commun. 5, 5638
variation of the fields is fixed or predetermined (2006). (2014).
in one direction. This is the case, for example, in 9. M. G. Silveirinha, N. Engheta, Phys. Rev. B 75, 075119 28. V. C. Nguyen, L. Chen, K. Halterman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105,
our experimental verification in a single-mode (2007). 233908 (2010).
10. A. H. Sihvola, Electromagnetic Mixing Formulas and 29. C. Della Giovampaola, N. Engheta, Phys. Rev. B 93, 195152
waveguide system. A similar behavior can be (2016).
Applications (IET, 1999).
obtained with 3D bodies with a high-aspect 11. Y. Wu, J. Li, Z. Q. Zhang, C. T. Chan, Phys. Rev. B 74, 085111 30. The numerical calculations were all performed in COMSOL
ratio, where the field along one axis asymptot- (2006). Multiphysics 5.0 (available at www.comsol.com).
ically becomes uniform [see fig. S15 (25)]. We 12. A. Alù, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075153 (2011).
believe that it provides a new pathway to engineer 13. P. M. T. Ikonen, E. Saenz, R. Gonzalo, C. R. Simovski,
S. A. Tretyakov, Metamaterials 1, 89–105 (2007). AC KNOWLED GME NTS
electromagnetic metamaterials and structures with 14. M. G. Silveirinha, N. Engheta, Phys. Rev. B 76, 245109 We acknowledge partial support from the Vannevar Bush Faculty
near-zero parameters, as well as their associated (2007). Fellowship program, sponsored by the Basic Research Office of
photonic phenomena. Specific examples of the 15. B. Edwards, A. Alù, M. E. Young, M. Silveirinha, N. Engheta, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
potential scientific and technological applica- Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 033903 (2008). and funded by the Office of Naval Research through grant
16. I. Liberal, A. M. Mahmoud, N. Engheta, Nat. Commun. 7, 10989 N00014-16-1-2029, and partial support from the U.S. Air Force
tions of this concept might include reconfigur- (2016). Office of Scientific Research Multidisciplinary University Research
able and flexible photonics (with a single small 17. S. Enoch, G. Tayeb, P. Sabouroux, N. Guérin, P. Vincent, Phys. Initiative Awards FA9550-12-1-0488 and FA9550-14-1-0389.
actuator that is arbitrarily located), nonlinear Rev. Lett. 89, 213902 (2002). Y.L. acknowledges partial support from the National Natural
optics (with enhanced field penetration in the 18. R. Sokhoyan, H. A. Atwater, Opt. Express 21, 32279–32290 Science Foundation of China under grant 61301001. All data used
(2013). to obtain our conclusions are present in the main paper and/or
ENZ host), and quantum metamaterials. 19. M. Z. Alam, I. De Leon, R. W. Boyd, Science 352, 795–797 the supplementary materials. Additional data related to this paper
(2016).
Doped photonics
Doping semiconductor materials with impurity atoms enables control of the optoelectronic properties that enhance
functionality. Liberal et al. describe numerically and experimentally an analogous doping effect for a group of photonic
materials. They introduced a dielectric into an otherwise nonmagnetic material, which produced a magnetic response.
The generality of the method should allow the design of photonic materials with enhanced and controlled electromagnetic
SUPPLEMENTARY http://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2017/03/08/355.6329.1058.DC1
MATERIALS
REFERENCES This article cites 25 articles, 2 of which you can access for free
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6329/1058#BIBL
PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions
Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. 2017 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive
licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. The title
Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.