3 views

Uploaded by JosemarPereiradaSilva

Thermodynamics

- Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics, 2nd Edition by Milo d. Koretsky (2)
- Aspen Plus
- 17.0 Distillation
- Distillation & Distillation Column
- Curve Fitting of Ammonia-Water Mixture Properties
- Vapor Liquid Equilibrium
- brits_vapour_2015.pdf
- exp_j
- Adsorption Equilibrium of Water on Silica Gel
- Separation Process - Absorption and Stripping 005
- LAB 1
- RD Feasible Distillation Regions
- 1-s2.0-014070079390079N-main.pdf
- Use of Aspen Plus and SPLIT to Calculate Phase Equilibria and Ternary Residue Curves
- Appendix Absorber
- Azeo data A to Z
- (2011) US6172258 Process for the production and purification of n-butyl acrylate.pdf
- Solutions.pdf
- Matlab VLE
- thermo

You are on page 1of 10

com

for ternary system

Kiyofumi Kurihara ∗ , Hiroyuki Matsuda, Katsumi Tochigi, Kenji Ochi, Kazuo Kojima

Department of Materials and Applied Chemistry, Nihon University, 8-14 Kanda-Surugadai, 1-chome Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8308, Japan

Received 9 May 2007; received in revised form 9 July 2007; accepted 9 July 2007

Available online 19 July 2007

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to describe a method for the determination of the valley and ridge of isobaric vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE) for ternary

systems which have a ternary azeotropic point at atmospheric and at lower pressure. The extended Redlich–Kister equation was employed as an

activity coefficient for calculating the isobaric VLE, because this equation can be applied to the isobaric conditions provided by the Gibbs–Duhem

equation, and to complete calculation of the ternary and binary azeotropes. It is possible by this method to determine the rigorous valley and ridge

curves thermodynamically. In order to test the reliability of the proposed method, it has been applied to determine the valley and ridge for the

system of acetone + chloroform + methanol, with a saddle point azeotrope at 101.3 kPa, and the details of the obtained curves are reported.

© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Extended Redlich–Kister equation; Ridge; Ternary; Valley; Vapor–liquid equilibrium data

1. Introduction

The ternary system of acetone + chloroform + methanol has a strong non-ideality of vapor–liquid equilibrium (VLE). This ternary

system exhibits ternary azeotropic points, and contains one binary maximum boiling azeotrope of acetone + chloroform and two

binary minimum boiling azeotropes of chloroform + methanol and acetone + methanol under isobaric conditions. There are three

types of ternary azeotropes: the first is a minimum boiling azeotrope, the second is a maximum boiling azeotrope, and the third is a

saddle point azeotrope. This azeotrope is a saddle point type, and the existence of the valley and ridge on its composition—bubble

point surface from the topological point of view is well-known [1–3]. According to Naka et al., the terms “valley” and “ridge” have

been defined as the curves which divide the pattern of vapor–liquid tie lines [2,3].

It is important to know the exact valley and ridge on the vapor–liquid composition diagram to separate such a mixture into desired

products by distillation, because the composition profiles of a distillation column are restricted. Naka et al. [2] have previously

proposed a method for obtaining these curves using the Wilson equation. Their method can be executed by an iterative calculation

of dew point or bubble point from the appropriate starting point, which is the neighborhood of the azeotrope or pure component.

However, they have two remaining problems. First, they have used the neighborhood of the azeotrope or pure component as the

starting point. Thus, it follows that their method is a close approximation. Second, Naka et al. have used their method to determine

the valley and ridge of acetone + chloroform + methanol [2]. This valley and ridge connects the two binary azeotropes through the

ternary azeotropic point (see below for further details). However, since the azeotropic point calculated using the Wilson equation

does not perfectly agree with those experimental data for both binary and ternary systems, the valley and ridge obtained using their

method are not able to intersect the experimental azeotropes.

This paper aims to resolve these problems with the valley and ridge, and proposes a rigorous method for their determination.

This method needs an activity coefficient equation to represent the isobaric VLE. That equation must satisfy the thermodynamic

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 3 3259 0822; fax: +81 3 3293 7572.

E-mail address: kurihara@chem.cst.nihon-u.ac.jp (K. Kurihara).

0378-3812/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2007.07.043

328 K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336

Fig. 1. Vapor–liquid equilibrium tie-lines (tails of arrows represent liquid-phase mole fractions x1 , x2 and heads of arrows represent vapor-phase mole fractions y1 ,

y2 ) for acetone(1) + chloroform(2) + methanol(3) at 101.3 kPa. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web

version of the article.)

isobaric conditions given by the generalized Gibbs–Duhem equation, and can completely reproduce the ternary and three binary

azeotropes. Therefore, the extended Redlich–Kister (ERK) equation [4,5] was employed as an activity coefficient equation in this

paper. The ERK equation fulfills all these conditions. The proposed method has been tested for obtaining the valley and ridge of

acetone + chloroform + methanol with a saddle point azeotrope at atmospheric pressure.

Fig. 1 shows the VLE data and the ternary and three binary azeotropic points for the ternary system of ace-

tone + chloroform + methanol [6] at 101.3 kPa. The experimental vapor–liquid tie lines indicated by the black arrows in Fig. 1

show the relationships between vapor commotion (the head of the arrows) and liquid composition (the tail of the arrows) in the VLE.

The composition profile of the total reflux distillation column which was calculated using the ERK equation (explained in detail

later) is shown in Fig. 2.

Since the valley and ridge can be defined by the curves which divide the patterns of vapor–liquid tie lines, those of this system

appear from the behavior of the tie lines in Figs. 1 and 2 as follows:

(1) Valley connects the two binary minimum boiling azeotropes of acetone + methanol (328.39 K) and chloroform + methanol

(326.48 K) through the ternary azeotropic point (330.82 K).

(2) Ridge connects the binary maximum boiling azeotrope of acetone + chloroform (337.62 K), the ternary azeotropic point

(330.82 K), and pure methanol (337.70 K).

Fig. 2. Distillation lines at total reflux (tails of arrows represent liquid-phase mole fractions x1 , x2 and heads of arrows represent vapor-phase mole fractions y1 , y2 )

for acetone(1) + chloroform(2) + methanol(3) at 101.3 kPa. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version

of the article.)

K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336 329

The isobaric VLE data of the ternary and its three constituent binary systems [6] have been correlated by the ERK equation

[4,5]. The number of the fitting parameters (NP) in the ERK equation can be changed according to the behavior of the experimental

activity coefficient that the target system possesses. One of the notable features of the ERK equation is this variable NP. In addition,

this equation fulfills the following three conditions which the proposed method in this paper desires:

(1) Isobaric condition given by the generalized Gibbs–Duhem equation is shown in Eq. (1):

n E

∂ ln γi H dT

xi =− (1)

∂x1 RT 2 dx1 P

i P

(2) Complete reproduction of the experimental ternary and binary azeotropic point.

(3) Good correlation of the VLE data of the ternary and its constituent binary systems.

In the ERK equation for a binary system, a binary excess Gibbs energy GE12 and a ratio ln(γ 1 /γ 2 ) of activity coefficients are given

by Eqs. (2) and (3):

GE12

= x1 x2 [B12 + C12 X12 + D12 X12

2

+ E12 X12

3

+ F12 X12

4

+ G12 X12

5

+ H12 X12

6

+ I12 X12

7

+ · · ·] (2)

RT

γ1

ln = a12 + b12 X21 + c12 (6x1 x2 − 1) + d12 X21 (1 − 8x1 x2 ) + e12 X21

2

(10x1 x2 − 1) + f12 X21

3

(1 − 12x1 x2 )

γ2

+g12 X21

4

(14x1 x2 − 1) + h12 X21

5

(1 − 16x1 x2 ) + · · · (3)

X12 = x1 − x2 (4)

where B12 , C12 ,. . ., I12 ,. . . and a12 , b12 ,. . ., h12 ,. . . are the binary parameters of the ERK equation. Activity coefficients can be then

calculated for components 1 and 2 using Eqs. (5) and (6) thermodynamically:

GE γ1

ln γ1 = 12 + x2 ln (5)

RT γ2

GE γ1

ln γ2 = 12 − x1 ln (6)

RT γ2

Between GE12 and ln(γ 1 /γ 2 ), thermodynamic conditions at the infinite dilution shown by Eqs. (7) and (8) must be satisfied:

E

G12 /RT γ1

= ln = ln(γ1 )x1 =0 = ln γ1∞ (7)

x1 x2 x1 =0 γ2 x1 =0

E

G12 /RT γ1

= −ln = ln(γ2 )x2 =0 = ln γ2∞ (8)

x1 x2 x2 =0 γ2 x2 =0

where γ1∞ and γ2∞ are the activity coefficients of component 1 and 2 at the infinite dilution. The following relationships among the

binary parameters and γi∞ are applied to Eqs. (2) and (3):

E

∞ G12 /RT

ln γ1 = = B12 − C12 + D12 − E12 + F12 − G12 + H12 − I12 + · · · (9)

x1 x2 x1 =0

E

∞ G12 /RT

ln γ2 = = B12 + C12 + D12 + E12 + F12 + G12 + H12 + I12 + · · · (10)

x1 x2 x2 =0

γ1

ln γ1∞ = ln = a12 + b12 − c12 + d12 − e12 + f12 − g12 + h12 − · · · (11)

γ2 x1 =0

330 K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336

γ1

ln γ2∞ = −ln = −a12 + b12 + c12 + d12 + e12 + f12 + g12 + h12 + · · · (12)

γ2 x2 =0

Rearranging Eqs. (9) and (10), the expressions of parameters B12 and C12 are represented by Eqs. (13) and (14), respectively:

ln γ1∞ + ln γ2∞

B12 = − D12 − F12 − H12 − · · · (13)

2

ln γ2∞ − ln γ1∞

C12 = − E12 − G12 − I12 − · · · (14)

2

Substituting Eqs. (13) and (14) into Eq. (2) and rearranging Eq. (2), Eq. (15) is derived as the ERK equation which can satisfied Eqs.

(7) and (8):

GE12 ln(γ1∞ γ2∞ ) + X12 ln(γ2∞ /γ1∞ )

= x1 x2 + D12 (X12

2

− 1) + E12 X12 (X12 2

− 1) + F12 (X12

4

− 1)

RT 2

+G12 X12 (X12 − 1) + H12 (X12 − 1) + I12 X12 (X12 − 1)

4 6 6

(15)

It should be noted that the values of ln(γ1∞ γ2∞ ) and ln(γ2∞ /γ1∞ ) are calculated by Eqs. (11) and (12) from the parameters a12 , b12 ,

c12 , d12 , e12 , f12 , g12 , h12 determined on the basis of the experimental ln(γ 1 /γ 2 ) beforehand.

In case of a correlation of the binary VLE data for an azeotropic mixture, the following equation must be used because the ERK

equation perfects the reproduction of the experimental azeotrope (the detail of these derivations is described in Appendix A reported

in the Supporting Information):

GE12 ln(γ1∞ γ2∞ ) + X12 ln(γ2∞ /γ1∞ )

= x1 x2 + (X12

2

− 1)[J12Azeo + E12 (X12 − X12Azeo ) + F12 (X12

2

− X12Azeo

2

)

RT 2

+ G12 {X12 (X12

2

+ 1) − X12Azeo (X12Azeo

2

+ 1)} + H12 (X12

4

+ X12

2

− X12Azeo

4

− X12Azeo

2

) + I12 {X12 (X12

4

+ X12

2

+ 1)

− X12Azeo (X12Azeo

4

+ X12Azeo

2

+ 1)}] (16)

γ1 γ1

ln = ln + b(X12Azeo − X12 ) + c12 (6x1 x2 − 6x1Azeo x2Azeo ) + d12 [X12 (8x1 x2 − 1)

γ2 γ2 Azeo

2

(10x1 x2 − 1) − X12Azeo

2

(10x1Azeo x2Azeo − 1)]

+f12 [X12

3

(12x1 x2 − 1) − X12Azeo

3

(12x1Azeo x2Azeo − 1)] + g12 [X12

4

(14x1 x2 − 1) − X12Azeo

4

(14x1Azeo x2Azeo − 1)]

+h12 [X12

5

(16x1 x2 − 1) − X12Azeo

5

(16x1Azeo x2Azeo − 1)] (17)

where the subscript Azeo indicates azeotropic condition.

Furthermore, the parameter E12 in Eq. (16) must be expressed by Eq. (18) so that the ERK equation satisfies one of the binary

azeotropic condition ((∂T/∂x1 )P,Azeo = 0). Eq. (18) is derived based on the generalized Gibbs–Duhem equation (see Appendix B in

the Supporting Information):

ln(γ1 /γ2 )Azeo + X12Azeo Δ12Azeo (1/2)ln(γ2∞ /γ1∞ ) + 2X12Azeo

2 J12Azeo

E12 = − − F12 (2X12Azeo )

2x1Azeo x2Azeo (X12Azeo − 1)

2 (X12Azeo − 1)

2

−G12 (3X12Azeo

2

+ 1) − H12 (4X12Azeo

3

+ 2X12Azeo ) − I12 (5X12Azeo

4

+ 3X12Azeo

2

+ 1) (18)

Consequently, the binary parameters (F12 , G12 , H12 , I12 ,. . . and b12 , c12 ,. . ., h12 ,. . .) of the ERK equation expressed by Eqs. (16)–(18)

have been estimated from both of the binary isobaric VLE data and its azeotropic data.

GE GE GE GE

= 12 + 23 + 31 + x1 x2 x3 [B + C1 X23 + C2 X31 + C3 X12 + D1 x2 X23 + D2 x3 X23 + D3 x3 X31

RT RT RT RT

+ D4 x1 X31 + D5 x1 X12 + D6 x2 X12 + · · ·] (19)

K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336 331

Xij = xi − xj (20)

γ1 γ1 γ1 γ1

ln = ln + ln + ln + x3 X21 b + Xγ12c1 c1 + Xγ12c2 c2 + Xγ12c3 c3 + Xγ12d1 d1

γ2 γ2 12 γ2 23 γ2 31

+Xγ12d2 d2 + Xγ12d3 d3 + Xγ12d4 d4 + Xγ12d5 d5 + Xγ12d6 d6 + · · · (21)

γ1

ln = a12 (1−x3 ) + X21 b12 + [6x1 x2 −(x1 + x2 )2 ]c12 + X21 [(x1 + x2 )2 − 8x1 x2 ]d12

γ2 12

+X21

2

[10x1 x2 − (x1 +x2 )2 ]e12 + X21

3

[(x1 + x2 )2 − 12x1 x2 ]f12 + X21

4

[14x1 x2 − (x1 + x2 )2 ]g12

+X21

5

[(x1 + x2 )2 − 16x1 x2 ]h12 (22)

γ1

ln = x3 [−a23 − b23 − (2x2 − x3 )c23 − X23 (3x2 − x3 )d23 − X23

2

(4x2 − x3 )e23 − X23

3

(5x2 − x3 )f23

γ2 23

−X234

(6x2 − x3 )g23 − X23

5

(7x2 − x3 )h23 ] (23)

γ1

ln = x3 [a31 + b31 + (x3 − 2x1 )c31 + X31 (x3 − 3x1 )d31 + X31

2

(x3 − 4x1 )e31 + X31

3

(x3 − 5x1 )f31

γ2 31

+ X31

4

(x3 − 6x1 )g31 + X31

5

(x3 − 7x1 )h31 ] (24)

Xγ12c2 = x3 (X21 X31 − x1 x2 ) (26)

Xγ12c3 = x3 (X21 X12 + 2x1 x2 ) (27)

Xγ12d1 = x3 [X21 x2 X23 + x1 x2 (−2x2 + x3 )] (28)

Xγ12d2 = x3 (X21 x3 X23 − x1 x2 x3 ) (29)

Xγ12d3 = x3 (X21 x3 X31 − x1 x2 x3 ) (30)

Xγ12d4 = x3 [X21 x1 X31 + x1 x2 (x3 − 2x1 )] (31)

2

+ x1 x2 (3x1 − x2 )] (32)

2

+ x1 x2 (−x1 + 3x2 )] (33)

γ3 γ3 γ3 γ3

ln = ln + ln + ln + x2 X13 b + Xγ31c1 c1 + Xγ31c2 c2 + Xγ31c3 c3 + Xγ31d1 d1 + Xγ31d2 d2

γ1 γ1 12 γ1 23 γ1 31

+ Xγ31d3 d3 + Xγ31d4 d4 + Xγ31d5 d5 + Xγ31d6 d6 (34)

γ3

ln = x2 [−a12 − b12 − (2x1 − x2 )c12 − X12 (3x1 − x2 )d12 − X12

2

(4x1 − x2 )e12 − X12

3

(5x1 − x2 )f12

γ1 12

−X12

4

(6x1 − x2 )g12 − X12

5

(7x1 − x2 )h12 ] (35)

γ3

ln = x2 [−a23 + b23 + (x2 − 2x3 )c23 + X23 (x2 − 3x3 )d23 + X23

2

(x2 − 4x3 )e23 + X23

3

(x2 − 5x3 )f23

γ1 23

+ X23

4

(x2 − 6x3 )g23 + X23

5

(x2 − 7x3 )h23 ] (36)

γ3

ln = a31 (1 − x2 ) + X13 b31 + [6x3 x1 − (x3 + x1 )2 ]c31 + X13 [(x3 + x1 )2 −8x3 x1 ]d31

γ1 31

+X13

2

[10x3 x1 −(x3 + x1 )2 ]e31 + X13

3

[(x3 + x1 )2 − 12x3 x1 ]f31 + X13

4

[14x3 x1 − (x3 + x1 )2 ]g31

+X13

5

[(x3 + x1 )2 − 16x3 x1 ]h31 (37)

332 K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336

Xγ31c3 = x2 [(x1 − x3 )(x1 − x2 ) − x1 x3 ] (40)

Xγ31d1 = x2 (X13 x2 X23 − x1 x2 x3 ) (41)

Xγ31d2 = x2 [X13 x3 X23 + x1 x3 (x2 − 2x3 )] (42)

2

+ x1 x3 (3x2 − x1 )] (43)

2

+ x1 x3 (3x1 − x3 )] (44)

Xγ31d5 = x2 [X13 x1 X12 + x1 x3 (−2x1 + x2 )] (45)

Xγ31d6 = x2 (X13 x2 X12 − x1 x2 x3 ) (46)

where B, C1 ,. . ., D6 and b, c1 ,. . ., d6 are ternary parameters for the ERK equation. Activity coefficients for components 1–3 are

thermodynamically expressed by Eqs. (47)–(49):

GE γ1 γ3

ln γ1 = + x2 ln − x3 ln (47)

RT γ2 γ1

γ1

ln γ2 = ln γ1 − ln (48)

γ2

γ3

ln γ3 = ln γ1 + ln (49)

γ1

If the ERK equation is employed to correlate the isobaric VLE data for the ternary system which has a ternary azeotropic point,

the ternary azeotrope can be completely calculated by means of using the relationships among the ternary parameters shown in

Appendix C depicted in the Supporting Information.

The experimental excess Gibbs energy GE /RT and ratio of the activity coefficients ln(γ i /γ j ) were calculated using the following

rigorous equation:

v L (P − P S )

ϕi Pyi = xi γi PiS ϕiS exp i i

(50)

RT

where ϕi and ϕiS are the fugacity coefficients of component i in the mixture and the pure vapor, respectively, which were calculated

using the second virial coefficients obtained by the Tsonopoulos method [7–10]. The liquid molar volumes vLi were calculated by

the modified Rackett equation [11]. The vapor pressures of the pure components PiS were calculated from the Antoine equation

constants from our earlier paper [7,12]. The parameters for the Tsonopoulos method and Antoine equation are referred to in our

earlier paper [7,12].

Table 1 lists the estimated binary and ternary parameters of the ERK equation, based on the experimental GE /RT and ln(γ i /γ j )

for the binary and ternary systems. The deviations between experimental and calculated vapor-phase compositions and bubble

temperatures of the three binary systems and the ternary system acetone + chloroform + methanol are shown in Table 2 and by the

red arrows in Fig. 1. The ERK equation gave satisfactory results for all the binary and ternary systems. Table 2 contains the deviations

at the experimental binary and ternary azeotropic points. These experimental azeotropic data were completely reproduced using the

ERK equation.

We also attempted to correlate the binary VLE data by the Wilson equation [13] and to predict the ternary VLE using the binary

Wilson parameters. The determined binary parameters are listed in Table 3 and the deviations are given in Table 2. The results for the

ERK equation were better than those for the Wilson equation for all the systems. The calculated values at the azeotropic point using

the Wilson parameters did not agree with those experimental data for both the binary and ternary systems. The Wilson equation gave

the maximum deviation of a vapor-phase composition of 0.027 mol fraction and a bubble temperature of 0.83 K.

The length of the vapor–liquid tie line on the composition triangular diagram in Fig. 1 is zero at the azeotropic point, but its slope

(∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo has a finite value. By means of utilizing this slope at the ternary azeotrope, it is possible to determine the valley and

ridge by the following procedure:

K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336

Table 1

Parameters of the extended Redlich–Kister equation for the three binary systems and acetone + chloroform + methanol system

System Bij ; aij Cij ; bij Dij ; cij Eij ; dij Fij ; eij Gij ; fij Hij ; gij Iij ; hij

Acetone(1) + chlorofom(2) −0.709974; 0.039460 0.061453; −0.789737 0.110031; 0.060472 0.281917; 0.048749 −0.287108; −0.046596 −0.909384; 0.0 0.146062; 0.0 0.540432; 0.0

Chlorofom(2) + methanol(3) 1.313399; −0.006512 0.470528; 1.322959 0.181056; 0.465296 −0.295027; 0.065866 0.023243; 0.062669 0.437707; 0.128874 0.0; 0.078731 0.0; 0.0

Methanol(3) + acetone(1) 0.641041; 0.011585 0.055932; 0.643127 0.066976; −0.004651 −0.550121; −0.004461 −0.167114; 0.028145 1.448936; −0.051005 0.133450; −0.046590 −0.989427; 0.086691

System B; b C1 ; c1 C2 ; c2 D2 ; d2 D4 ; d4

Acetone(1) + chlorofom(2) + methanol(3) −0.810183; −0.574224 0.028344; 0.152886 −1.800606; −0.999503 −0.711886; −0.854029 3.389361; 0.710746

333

334 K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336

Table 2

Deviations between experimental and calculated vapor-phase mole fractions yi and bubble temperatures T using the extended Redlich–Kister and Wilson

equationsa

Acetone(1) + chloroform(2) Chloroform(1) + methanol(2) Acetone(1) + methanol(2) Acetone(1) + chloroform(2) + methanol(3)

ERK equation

Average 0.1 0.03 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.2 0.5 0.17

Maximum 0.3 0.08 0.7 0.21 0.2 0.06 1.0 1.7 0.75

Azeotrope 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00

Wilson equation

Average 0.8 0.23 0.7 0.13 0.2 0.04 0.8 0.6 0.59

Maximum 1.7 0.66 1.3 0.24 0.4 0.09 1.6 2.7 0.83

Azeotrope 1.6 0.09 0.5 0.08 1.3 0.02 1.0 1.0 0.50

N |yi,exp tl −yi,calc t |j N |T exp tl −Tcalc t |j

a yi = j N , T = j N , N = number of data points.

Table 3

Parameters of the Wilson equation for the three binary systems

Parameter Acetone(1) + chloroform(2) Chloroform(1) + methanol(2) Acetone(1) + methanol(2)

λ21 − λ22 (J mol−1 ) −1337.61 7509.93 2726.99

1. Assume a straight line which passes the ternary azeotrope (xi,Azeo ) and has a slope (∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo .

2. Calculate the slope (∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo at the ternary azeotrope (see following).

3. Calculate the point very close to (x1,Azeo , x2,Azeo , x3,Azeo ) using Eqs. (51)–(53):

∂x2

x2,Start = x2,Azeo + (±x1 ) (52)

∂x1 Azeo

where x1 is a very small mole fraction (we allowed x1 to equal 10−5 mol fraction in this paper). This point is virtually placed

on a locus of a vapor–liquid tie line which intersects the ternary azeotropic point. This locus is just on the valley or ridge. Let this

point be a starting point, and execute an iterative calculation of the bubble point or dew point from the starting point. The valley is

given using the bubble point calculation, and the ridge is given using the dew point calculation.

The slope (∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo of an isobaric vapor–liquid tie line on a composition triangular diagram in Fig. 1 was obtained by Eq.

(54) at the ternary azeotropic point (see Appendix E presented in the Supporting Information):

∂x2 (∂y2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo

= (54)

∂x1 P,Azeo (∂y1 /∂x1 )P,Azeo

The terms (∂y2 /∂x1 ) and (∂y1 /∂x1 ) are provided by means of differentiating the ternary VLE expression shown by Eq. (50), by liquid

composition x1 for a binary system at constant P (see Appendix F reported in the Supporting Information). After applying the

following azeotropic condition to (∂y2 /∂x1 ) and (∂y1 /∂x1 ):

xi

Ki = =1 (55)

yi

∂T

=0 (56)

∂x1 P,Azeo

K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336 335

to rearrange Eq. (54) by substituting the derived equations of (∂y2 /∂x1 ) and (∂y1 /∂x1 ) into Eq. (54), the quadratic equation is derived

as follows:

E2 F3 G1 ∂x2 2 E 1 F3 G 2 E 2 G1 H3 ∂x2 E 1 G2 H3

− E 2 F1 + E 1 F2 − E 2 H 1 − + + E 1 H2 − =0

G3 ∂x1 Azeo G3 G3 ∂x1 Azeo G3

(57)

Since the ERK equation has been adopted as the expression of an activity coefficient in Eq. (50), eight variables Ek , Fk , Gk , and Hk

in Eq. (57) are calculated by the equations given in Appendix G provided in the Supporting Information.

Therefore, the slope (∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo of the vapor–liquid tie line at the ternary azeotropic point is estimated as two roots of the

second order Eq. (57). It must be noted that the ternary parameters of the ERK equation must be applicable to the azeotropic condition

expressed by Eqs. (55) and (56). The slope (∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo of the ternary system was obtained on the basis of the parameters given

in Table 1 in this paper.

The valley and ridge of the ternary system acetone + chloroform + methanol which were determined by the method proposed in

this paper are shown with blue and green lines in Figs. 1 and 2. The following values of (∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo were calculated using Eq.

(57), with the parameters of the ERK shown in Table 1:

∂x2 ∂x2

= −0.851298 for valley, = 1.012840 for ridge

∂x1 P,Azeo ∂x1 P,Azeo

As these figures indicate, the valley and ridge calculated using our proposed method completely intersect the experimental ternary

and binary azeotropic data, and the vapor–liquid composition surface was divided into four regions by the ridge and valley. All the

vapor–liquid tie lines shown in Figs. 1 and 2 cannot be drawn across the valley and ridge in each region that they divide. We can say

that the definition of the valley and ridge employed in this paper is correct thermodynamically.

As mentioned above, the valley and ridge of the ternary system can be determined approximately by the procedure proposed by

Naka et al., combined with the Wilson equation instead of the ERK equation. Their method is simpler than our proposed method.

However, their results do not intersect all the experimental ternary and binary azeotropic points, because the azeotropic points

calculated using the Wilson equation are not in perfect agreement with those experimental data for both the binary and ternary

systems. Consequently, their valley and ridge are affected by the deviations at the experimental azeotropic point.

7. Conclusions

A method for determining the valley and ridge in the isobaric VLE is proposed for a ternary system of ace-

tone + chloroform + methanol which exhibits a saddle point azeotrope at 101.3 kPa. This method is able to determine the valley

and ridge curves strictly using the ERK equation for fitting the isobaric VLE data. The valley and ridge must connect the two binary

azeotropes through the ternary azeotropic point. However, it is impossible by the methods previously proposed to obtain the valley

and ridge which pass the experimental ternary and binary azeotropes. Our proposed method solves this problem and can calculate

the valley and ridge which completely intersect the experimental ternary and binary azeotropic points.

List of symbols

aij , bij , cij , dij , eij , fij , gij , hij ternary parameters of the ERK equation in Eq. (3)

Aij , Bij , Cij , Dij , Eij , Fij , Gij , Hij , Iij binary parameters of the ERK equation in Eq. (2)

Ai,ANT , Bi,ANT , Ci,ANT parameters of the Antoine equation of component i

b, ck , dm (k = 1–3, m = 1–6) ternary parameters of the ERK equation in Eqs. (21) and (34)

B, Ck , Dm (k = 1–3, m = 1–6) ternary parameters of the ERK equation in Eq. (7)

Bi,ANT parameters of the Antoine equation of component i (K)

Bij,vir second virial cross-coefficient between i and j (m3 mol−1 )

Bvir , Bii,vir second virial coefficient of mixture and component i (m3 mol−1 )

Ci,ANT parameters of the Antoine equation of component i (K)

En , Fn , Gn , Hn , In (n = 1–3) function to calculate (∂x2 /∂x1 )P,Azeo using Eq. (57)

GE molar excess Gibbs energy (J mol−1 )

P pressure (Pa)

PS saturated vapor pressure of pure component (Pa)

R gas constant (=8.314) (J K−1 mol−1 )

T absolute temperature (K)

336 K. Kurihara et al. / Fluid Phase Equilibria 261 (2007) 327–336

x mole fraction in liquid phase

y mole fraction in vapor phase

Z compressibility factor

ZRA parameter of the modified Racket equation

Greek letters

γi activity coefficient of component i

ϕi fugacity coefficient of component i in vapor mixture

ϕiS fugacity coefficients of component i in pure vapor at saturated T

ω acentric factor

Subscripts

Azeo azeotropic point

C critical

r reduced value

Start starting composition for determining valley or ridge

Tso parameter for the Tsonopoulos method

1, 2, 3, i, j components 1, 2, 3, and i, j

Superscripts

E excess property

L liquid phase

S saturated state

V vapor phase

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.fluid.2007.07.043.

References

[1] R.H. Perry, D.W. Green, Perry’s Chemical Engineer’s Handbook, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, 1997.

[2] Y. Naka, K. Kobayashi, T. Takamatsu, Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 1 (1975) 186–190.

[3] Y. Naka, K. Kobayashi, H. Ochi, T. Takamatsu, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1 (1983) 39–42.

[4] K.C. Chao, Ind. Eng. Chem. 51 (1959) 93–94.

[5] K. Ochi, B.C.-Y. Lu, Fluid Phase Equilib. 1 (1978) 185–200.

[6] T. Hiaki, K. Kurihara, K. Kojima, J. Chem. Eng. Data 39 (1994) 714–719.

[7] K. Kurihara, H. Hori, K. Kojima, J. Chem. Eng. Data 43 (1998) 264–268.

[8] C. Tsonopoulos, AIChE J. 20 (1974) 263–272.

[9] C. Tsonopoulos, AIChE J. 21 (1975) 827–829.

[10] C. Tsonopoulos, H. Dymond, M. Szafranski, Pure Appl. Chem. 61 (1989) 1387–1403.

[11] C.F. Spencer, S.B. Adler, J. Chem. Eng. Data 23 (1978) 82–89.

[12] K. Kurihara, Y. Takimoto, K. Ochi, K. Kojima, J. Chem. Eng. Data 45 (2000) 792–795.

[13] G.M. Wilson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86 (1964) 127–130.

- Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics, 2nd Edition by Milo d. Koretsky (2)Uploaded bySalman Haroon
- Aspen PlusUploaded byLi Tin
- 17.0 DistillationUploaded bycheesewizz
- Distillation & Distillation ColumnUploaded bysushil kumar
- Curve Fitting of Ammonia-Water Mixture PropertiesUploaded bySandro Goisis
- Vapor Liquid EquilibriumUploaded byMd. Hasib Al Mahbub
- brits_vapour_2015.pdfUploaded byMiguel Hernandez
- exp_jUploaded byTrish Gerong
- Adsorption Equilibrium of Water on Silica GelUploaded byfragozo8
- Separation Process - Absorption and Stripping 005Uploaded byKaizer Sevenfold
- LAB 1Uploaded byayilna_suhaila
- RD Feasible Distillation RegionsUploaded byAkk Kol
- 1-s2.0-014070079390079N-main.pdfUploaded by15292
- Use of Aspen Plus and SPLIT to Calculate Phase Equilibria and Ternary Residue CurvesUploaded byPaulo Sérgio
- Appendix AbsorberUploaded bymitikeshav_935105731
- Azeo data A to ZUploaded byRamakrishna Somu
- (2011) US6172258 Process for the production and purification of n-butyl acrylate.pdfUploaded byremi1988
- Solutions.pdfUploaded byAnirudh
- Matlab VLEUploaded byVyan Ilham
- thermoUploaded byTashi Stunner Best
- Separation Analysis Using Matlab_example3Uploaded byolcymelis
- Wang_2016_SA.pdfUploaded byanon_531994404
- IMECS2013_pp143-147.pdfUploaded bySomanath Pawar
- Quarter 1 Week 6Uploaded byGeoffrey Tolentino-Unida
- r5312305 Mass Transfer and SeparationUploaded bysivabharathamurthy
- Cai, J. & Prausnitz, J. M. (2004). Thermodynamics for Fluid Mixtures Near to and Far From the Vapor–Liquid Critical Point. Fluid Phase Equilibria 219, 205–217Uploaded byMarco Ravelo
- Fluid Phase Equilibria Volume 265 Issue 1-2 2008 [Doi 10.1016%2Fj.fluid.2008.01.010] a. Cháfer; J. de La Torre; J.B. Monton; E. Lladosa -- Liquid–Liquid Equilibria of the Systems Isobutyl Acetate Uploaded byfajar
- Chbe 346 Lecture 23 ReviewUploaded byJamie Samuel
- DISTILLATION2-2Uploaded byKema Technowaka
- DLL_SCIENCE 6_Q1_W6Uploaded byGeoffrey Tolentino-Unida

- Possible Existence of a Negative (Positive) Homogeneous Azeotrope When the Binary Mixtures Exhibits Positive (Negative) Deviation From Ideal Solution BehaviorUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- science.pdfUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Wastewater Guide October 2013 LowresUploaded by185412
- A New Unifac Parameterization for the Prediction of Liquid Liquid Equilibrium of Biodiesel SystemsUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Uncontrained Gibbs Free Energy Minimization for Phase Equilibrium Calculations in Nonreactive Systems Using an Improved Cuckoo Search AlgorithmUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- B.W. Bequette -Process Dynamics- Modeling, Analysis and SimulationUploaded byKaren Franke
- Optimization MATLAB ExercisesUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- 143688853-DESTILACAOUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- A Simplified Method for Calculating Saturated Liquid Densities 2004 Fluid Phase EquilibriaUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- A New Correlation for Thermal Conductivity of LiquidsUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Vapor-liquid Equilibria for the Ternary Mixture Co2-1propanol-Propyl Acetato at Elevated PressuresUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- A Generalized Equation for Diffusion in LiquidsUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Computation of Isobaric Vapor Liquid Equilibrium Data for Binary and Ternary Mixtures of Methanol, Water and Ethanoic AcidUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Measurement and Calculation of Vapor Liquid Equilibria for Methanol Glycerol and Ethanol Glycerol Systems at 493 573 K 2009 Fluid Phase EquilibriaUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Separation of Acetonitrila Methanol Benzene Ternary Azeotrope via Triple Column Pressure Swing DistillationUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Liquid phase equilibria of (water+phosphoric acid 1 butanolUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- phase stability analysis of liquid liquid equilibrium.pdfUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- A Powerful Algorithm for Liquid}Liquid}Liquid EquilibriaUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Phase Stability Analysis of Liquid Liquid EquilibriumUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Phase Stability Analysis of Liquid Liquid EquilibriumUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- LVEUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Solvent Effects on Vapor-liquid Equilibria of the Binary Systems 1 Hexene and n HexaneUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- Optimization in ScilabUploaded byMajor Bill Smith
- 1-s2.0-S0014305708002103-mainUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva
- 1-s2.0-S0927775714000284-mainUploaded byJosemarPereiradaSilva

- Corporate Sponsorship Packet- Napa 12Uploaded byDRUSSELL2220
- ControlerUploaded byenco123enco
- PARfessionals Train the Trainers ProgramUploaded byPARFESSIONALS BEHAVORIAL HEALTH RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- LABS ProposalUploaded byXandae Mempin
- Women and Economic PolicyUploaded byOxfam
- Armalite 2015.pdfUploaded byAdrian Kozel
- De la spre monument.pdfUploaded byileanabbc_422485993
- f Imnci ManualUploaded byvinoth1128
- Scaffolding safety offshoreUploaded byshanemoneill408
- Preventive MaintenanceUploaded bySaeed Mohammed
- ramonhuiskampinternship cvUploaded byapi-345112316
- ReviewUploaded bySheilla Hermanto
- 2151458517750516 (1)Uploaded bybeatrice
- JDP 3-40.pdfUploaded byMark Reinhardt
- Goffman the Presentation of Self PDFUploaded byAmy
- SBA_Form_159_7a_3Uploaded byBrian
- Regulating Sewage Pollution of Malaysian RiversUploaded bysulihah12
- Introduction to Conformal MappingUploaded byBrian Pinto
- Exhibitor 32778Uploaded byMuhammad Naveed Rasool
- InvestigationsUploaded byazibanjum
- US 2010-10 Whitepaper BI Project Management 101Uploaded byOluwatobiAdewale
- [July-2017] New PassLeader 400-151 Exam Dumps.pdfUploaded byvalliappan al
- Opstinsko Celo 2006pdfUploaded byMilorad Rumenic
- DOS ArticleUploaded byDharmendra Kumar Verma
- Biology Project on Ivf And moreUploaded byudit
- nicholas ponce resumeUploaded byapi-254449501
- Philips GreenPerformUploaded bymytan111
- Design Calc s ManualUploaded byGustav
- Chapter Ii_fluid StaticsUploaded byzetseatberhanu
- E1 - Engine Room LayoutUploaded byrahul yo yo