2 views

Uploaded by paivensolidsnake

- E436-03(2014) Standard Test Method for Drop-Weight Tear Tests of Ferritic Steels.pdf
- FE Pipe Documentacion
- Pressure Vessel Design12
- Failure Analysis
- Failure Models
- ProblemSet 4 Solutions
- Fracture Mechanics
- Teknologi Bahan_2 Analisis Kegagalan Material_Herman(1)
- Fracture Control
- Loss of constraint during fracture toughness testing of duplex stainless steels.pdf
- Beam Column Joint
- 1-2
- EVALUATION OF 8090 AND WELDALITE-049 ALUMINUM-LITHIUM ALLOYS
- Caceres-L3 Understanding Materials Selection Charts
- LS-Dyna Simulated Crack in Several Ways
- 1-s2.0-S0020768309002662-main
- 3-14
- Fracture Mechanics Podrecznik
- 13 Lecture Week 5 Version2
- Effect of Thickness and Notch Radius on Fracture Toughness of Polycrbonate

You are on page 1of 46

Measurement of Fracture Toughness1

This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 1820; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of

original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A

superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.

1.1 This test method covers procedures and guidelines for ness2

the determination of fracture toughness of metallic materials E 1152 Test Method for Determining J-R Curves2

using the following parameters: K, J, and CTOD (d). Tough- E 1290 Test Method for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement

ness can be measured in the R-curve format or as a point value. (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement2

The fracture toughness determined in accordance with this test E 1737 Test Method for J-Integral Characterization of Frac-

method is for the opening mode (Mode I) of loading. ture Toughness2

1.2 The recommended specimens are single-edge bend, E 1823 Terminology Relating to Fatigue and Fracture

[SE(B)], compact, [C(T)], and disk-shaped compact, [DC(T)]. Testing2

All specimens contain notches that are sharpened with fatigue E 1921 Test Method for Determination of Reference Tem-

cracks. perature, To, for Ferric Steels in Transition Range2

1.2.1 Specimen dimensional (size) requirements vary ac- E 1942 Guide for Evaluating Data Acquisition Systems

cording to the fracture toughness analysis applied. The guide- Used in Cyclic Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics Testing2

lines are established through consideration of material tough- 3. Terminology

ness, material flow strength, and the individual qualification

requirements of the toughness value per values sought. 3.1 Terminology E 1823 is applicable to this test method.

1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the 3.2 Definitions:

standard. The values given in parentheses are for information 3.2.1 compliance [LF−1], n— the ratio of displacement

only. increment to load increment.

1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the 3.2.2 crack displacement [L], n—the separation vector be-

safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the tween two points (on the surfaces of a deformed crack) that

responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- were coincident on the surfaces of an ideal crack in the

priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- undeformed condition.

bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. 3.2.2.1 Discussion—In this practice, displacement, v, is the

total displacement measured by clip gages or other devices

NOTE 1—Other standard methods for the determination of fracture spanning the crack faces.

toughness using the parameters K, J, and CTOD are contained in Test

3.2.3 crack extension, Da [L], n—an increase in crack size.

Methods E 399, E 813, E 1152, E 1290, and E 1737. This test method was

developed to provide a common method for determining all applicable 3.2.4 crack-extension force, G [FL−1 or FLL−2], n—the

toughness parameters from a single test. elastic energy per unit of new separation area that is made

available at the front of an ideal crack in an elastic solid during

2. Referenced Documents a virtual increment of forward crack extension.

2.1 ASTM Standards: 3.2.5 crack size, a [L], n—a lineal measure of a principal

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

E 4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines2 planar dimension of a crack. This measure is commonly used

E 8 Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials2 in the calculation of quantities descriptive of the stress and

E 21 Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests displacement fields, and is often also termed crack length or

of Metallic Materials2 depth.

E 399 Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of 3.2.5.1 Discussion—In practice, the value of a is obtained

Metallic Materials2 from procedures for measurement of physical crack size, ap,

original crack size, ao, and effective crack size, ae, as appro-

1

This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E08 on Fatigue

priate to the situation being considered.

and Fracture and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E08.08 on Elastic- 3.2.6 crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD), d [L],

Plastic Fracture Mechanics Technology. n—the crack displacement due to elastic and plastic deforma-

Current edition approved June 10, 2001. Published August 2001. Originally tion at variously defined locations near the original (prior to an

published as E 1820 - 96. Last previous edition E 1820 - 99a.

2

Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 03.01. application of load) crack tip.

Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 1 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

* S Wdy 2 T̄ · ]x ds D

3.2.6.1 Discussion—In this test method, CTOD is the dis- ] ū

J5 (2)

placement of the crack surfaces normal to the original (un- G

loaded) crack plane at the tip of the fatigue precrack, ao. In this

where:

test method, CTOD is calculated at the original crack length,

W = loading work per unit volume or, for elastic

ao, from observations away from the crack tip.

bodies, strain energy density,

3.2.6.2 Discussion—In CTOD testing, dIc [L] is a value of G = path of the integral, that encloses (that is,

CTOD near the onset of slow stable crack extension, here contains) the crack tip,

defined as occurring at Dap = 0.2 mm (0.008 in.) + 0.7dIc. ds = increment of the contour path,

3.2.6.3 Discussion—In CTOD testing, dc [L] is the value of T̄ = outward traction vector on ds,

CTOD at the onset of unstable crack extension (see 3.2.17) or ū = displacement vector at ds,

pop-in (see 3.2.17) when Dap<0.2 mm (0.008 in.) + 0.7dc. The x, y, z = rectangular coordinates, and

dc corresponds to the load Pc and clip-gage displacement vc. It ]ū = rate of work input from the stress field into

T̄· ]x ds

may be size-dependent and a function of test specimen the area enclosed by G.

geometry. 3.2.9.2 Discussion—The value of J obtained from this

3.2.6.4 Discussion—In CTOD testing, du [L] is the value of equation is taken to be path-independent in test specimens

CTOD at the onset of unstable crack extension (see 3.2.28) or commonly used, but in service components (and perhaps in test

pop-in (see 3.2.17) when the event is preceded by D ap >0.2 specimens) caution is needed to adequately consider loading

mm (0.008 in.) + 0.7du. The du corresponds to the load Pu and interior to G such as from rapid motion of the crack or the

the clip gage displacement vu. It may be size-dependent and a service component, and from residual or thermal stress.

function of test specimen geometry. It can be useful to define 3.2.9.3 Discussion—In elastic (linear or nonlinear) solids,

limits on ductile fracture behavior. the J-integral equals the crack-extension force, G. (See crack

3.2.6.5 Discussion—In CTOD testing, dm [L] is the value of extension force.)

CTOD at the first attainment of a maximum load plateau for 3.2.10 Jc [FL−1]—The property Jc determined by this test

fully plastic behavior. The dm corresponds to the load Pm and method characterizes the fracture toughness of materials at

the clip gage displacement vm. It may be size-dependent and a fracture instability prior to the onset of significant stable

function of test specimen geometry. It can be useful to define tearing crack extension. The value of Jc determined by this test

limits on ductile fracture behavior. method represents a measure of fracture toughness at instabil-

3.2.6.6 Discussion—In CTOD testing, []dc[L]character- ity without significant stable crack extension that is indepen-

izes the CTOD fracture toughness of materials at fracture dent of in-plane dimensions; however, there may be a depen-

instability prior to the onset of significant stable tearing crack dence of toughness on thickness (length of crack front).

extension. The value of []dc c determined by this test method 3.2.11 Ju [FL−1]—The quantity Ju determined by this test

represents a measure of fracture toughness at instability with- method measures fracture instability after the onset of signifi-

out significant stable crack extension that is independent of cant stable tearing crack extension. It may be size-dependent

in-plane dimensions. However, there may be a dependence of and a function of test specimen geometry. It can be useful to

toughness on thickness (length of crack front). define limits on ductile fracture behavior.

3.2.7 effective thickness, Be [L], n—for side-grooved speci- 3.2.12 net thickness, BN [L], n—distance between the roots

mens Be = B − (B − B N)2/B. This is used for the elastic of the side grooves in side-grooved specimens.

unloading compliance measurement of crack length. 3.2.13 original crack size, ao [L], n—the physical crack size

3.2.7.1 Discussion—This definition is different from the at the start of testing.

definition of effective thickness in Test Method E 813. 3.2.13.1 Discussion—In this test method, aoq is used to

3.2.8 effective yield strength, sY [FL−2], n—an assumed denote original crack size estimated from compliance.

value of uniaxial yield strength that represents the influence of 3.2.14 original remaining ligament, bo [L], n—distance

plastic yielding upon fracture test parameters. from the original crack front to the back edge of the specimen,

3.2.8.1 Discussion—It is calculated as the average of the that is (bo = W − a o).

0.2 % offset yield strength sYS, and the ultimate tensile

3.2.15 physical crack size, ap [L], n—the distance from a

strength, sTS as follows:

reference plane to the observed crack front. This distance may

~sYS 1 sTS! represent an average of several measurements along the crack

sY 5 2 (1)

front. The reference plane depends on the specimen form, and

3.2.8.2 Discussion—In estimating sY, influences of testing it is normally taken to be either the boundary, or a plane

conditions, such as loading rate and temperature, should be containing either the load line or the centerline of a specimen

considered. or plate. The reference plane is defined prior to specimen

3.2.9 J-integral, J [FL−1], n—a mathematical expression, a deformation.

line or surface integral that encloses the crack front from one 3.2.16 plane-strain fracture toughness, KIc [FL−3/2], JIc

crack surface to the other, used to characterize the local [FL−1], KJIc [FL−3/2] , n—the crack-extension resistance under

stress-strain field around the crack front. conditions of crack-tip plane strain.

3.2.9.1 Discussion—The J-integral expression for a two- 3.2.16.1 Discussion—For example, in Mode I for slow rates

dimensional crack, in the x-z plane with the crack front parallel of loading and negligible plastic-zone adjustment, plane-strain

to the z-axis, is the line integral as follows: fracture toughness is the value of the stress-intensity factor

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 2 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

designated KIc [FL−3/2] as measured using the operational 3.2.26.1 Discussion—Values of K for the Modes 1, 2, and 3

procedure (and satisfying all of the qualification requirements) are given by the following equations:

specified in this test method, which provides for the measure- lim

K1 5 r→0 @syy ~2pr!1/2# (3)

ment of crack-extension resistance at the start of crack exten-

lim 1/2

sion and provides operational definitions of crack-tip sharp- K2 5 r→0@t xy ~2pr ! # (4)

ness, start of crack extension, and crack-tip plane-strain. K3 5 lim 1/2

r→0@tyz ~2pr ! # (5)

3.2.16.2 Discussion—For example, in Mode I for slow rates

where r = distance directly forward from the crack tip to a location

of loading and substantial plastic deformation, plane-strain

where the significant stress is calculated.

fracture toughness is the value of the J-integral designated JIc

[FL−1] as measured using the operational procedure (and 3.2.26.2 Discussion—In this test method, Mode 1 or Mode

satisfying all of the qualification requirements) specified in this I is assumed. See Terminology E 1823 for definition of mode.

test method, that provides for the measurement of crack- 3.2.27 stretch-zone width, SZW [L], n—the length of crack

extension resistance near the onset of stable crack extension. extension that occurs during crack-tip blunting, for example,

3.2.16.3 Discussion—For example, in Mode I for slow rates prior to the onset of unstable brittle crack extension, pop-in, or

of loading, plane-strain fracture toughness is the value of the slow stable crack extension. The SZW is in the same plane as

stress intensity designated KJIc[FL−3/2] calculated from JIc the original (unloaded) fatigue precrack and refers to an

using the equation (and satisfying all of the qualification extension beyond the original crack size.

requirements) specified in this test method, that provides for 3.2.28 unstable crack extension [L], n—an abrupt crack

the measurement of crack-extension reistance near the onset of extension that occurs with or without prior stable crack

stable crack extension under dominant elastic conditions.(1)3 extension in a standard test specimen under crosshead or clip

3.2.17 pop-in, n—a discontinuity in the load versus clip gage displacement control.

gage displacement record. The record of a pop-in shows a

sudden increase in displacement and, generally a decrease in 4. Summary of Test Method

load. Subsequently, the displacement and load increase to 4.1 The objective of this test method is to load a fatigue

above their respective values at pop-in. precracked test specimen to induce either or both of the

3.2.18 R-curve or J-R curve, n—a plot of crack extension following responses (1) unstable crack extension, including

resistance as a function of stable crack extension, Dap or Dae. significant pop-in, referred to as “fracture instability” in this

3.2.18.1 Discussion—In this test method, the J-R curve is a test method; (2) stable crack extension, referred to as “stable

plot of the far-field J-integral versus the physical crack tearing” in this test method. Fracture instability results in a

extension, Dap. It is recognized that the far-field value of J may single point-value of fracture toughness determined at the point

not represent the stress-strain field local to a growing crack. of instability. Stable tearing results in a continuous fracture

3.2.19 remaining ligament, b [L], n—distance from the toughness versus crack-extension relationship (R-curve) from

physical crack front to the back edge of the specimen, that is which significant point-values may be determined. Stable

(b = W − ap). tearing interrupted by fracture instability results in an R-curve

3.2.20 specimen center of pin hole distance, H* [L], n—the up to the point of instability.

distance between the center of the pin holes on a pin-loaded 4.2 This test method requires continuous measurement of

specimen. load versus load-line displacement and crack mouth opening

3.2.21 specimen gage length, d [L], n—the distance be- displacement. If any stable tearing response occurs, then an

tween the points of displacement measure (for example, clip R-curve is developed and the amount of slow-stable crack

gage, gage length). extension shall be measured.

3.2.22 specimen span, S [L], n—the distance between 4.3 Two alternative procedures for measuring crack exten-

specimen supports. sion are presented, the basic procedure and the resistance curve

3.2.23 specimen thickness, B [L], n—the side-to-side di- procedure. The basic procedure involves physical marking of

mension of the specimen being tested. the crack advance and multiple specimens used to develop a

3.2.24 specimen width, W [L], n—a physical dimension on plot from which a single point initiation toughness value can be

a test specimen measured from a reference position such as the evaluated. The basic procedure cannot be used to develop an

front edge in a bend specimen or the load line in the compact R-curve. The resistance curve procedure is an elastic-

specimen to the back edge of the specimen. compliance method where multiple points are determined from

3.2.25 stable crack extension [L], n—a displacement- a single specimen. In the latter case, high precision of signal

controlled crack extension beyond the stretch-zone width (see resolution is required; however, these data can be used to

3.2.27). The extension stops when the applied displacement is develop an R-curve. Other procedures for measuring crack

held constant. extension are allowed.

3.2.26 stress-intensity factor, K, K1, K2, K3, KI, KII, KIII 4.4 The commonality of instrumentation and recommended

[FL−3/2], n—the magnitude of the ideal-crack-tip stress field testing procedure contained herein permits the application of

(stress-field singularity) for a particular mode in a homoge- data to more than one method of evaluating fracture toughness.

neous, linear-elastic body. Annex A4-Annex A11 define the various data treatment op-

tions that are available, and these should be reviewed to

3

The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to a list of references at the end of optimize data transferability.

this test method. 4.5 Data that are generated following the procedures and

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 3 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

guidelines contained in this test method are labeled qualified transition regime. This response is especially sensitive to

data. Data that meet the size criteria in Annex A4-Annex A11 material inhomogeneity and to constraint variations that may

are insensitive to in-plane dimensions. be induced by planar geometry, thickness differences, mode of

4.6 Supplementary information about the background of loading, and structural details.

this test method and rationale for many of the technical 5.2.2 The J-R curve from bend-type specimens recom-

requirements of this test method are contained in (2). The mended by this test method (SE(B), C(T), and DC(T)) has been

formulas presented in this test method are applicable over the observed to be conservative with respect to results from tensile

range of crack length and specimen sizes within the scope of loading configurations.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

this test method. 5.2.3 The values of dc, du, dm, and Ju may be affected by

specimen dimensions.

5. Significance and Use

5.1 Assuming the presence of a preexisting, sharp, fatigue 6. Apparatus

crack, the material fracture toughness values identified by this 6.1 Apparatus is required for measurement of applied load,

test method characterize its resistance to: (1) fracture of a load-line displacement, and crack-mouth opening displace-

stationary crack, (2) fracture after some stable tearing, (3) ment. Load versus load-line displacement and load versus

stable tearing onset, and ( 4) sustained stable tearing. This test crack-mouth opening displacement may be recorded digitally

method is particularly useful when the material response for processing by computer or autographically with an x-y

cannot be anticipated before the test. plotter. Test fixtures for each specimen type are described in the

5.1.1 These fracture toughness values may serve as a basis applicable Annex.

for material comparison, selection, and quality assurance. 6.2 Displacement Gages:

Fracture toughness can be used to rank materials within a 6.2.1 Displacement measurements are needed for the fol-

similar yield strength range. lowing purposes: to evaluate PQ in the KIc evaluation, J from

5.1.2 These fracture toughness values may serve as a basis the area under the load versus load-line displacement record,

for structural flaw tolerance assessment. Awareness of differ- CTOD from the load versus crack-mouth opening displace-

ences that may exist between laboratory test and field condi- ment record and, for the elastic compliance method, to infer

tions is required to make proper flaw tolerance assessment. crack extension, D ap, from elastic compliance calculations.

5.2 The following cautionary statements are based on some 6.2.2 The recommended displacement gage has a working

observations. range of not more than twice the displacement expected during

FIG. 1 Double-Cantilever Clip-In Displacement Gage Mounted By Means of Integral Knife Edges

5.2.1 Particular care must be exercised in applying to the test. When the expected displacement is less than 3.75 mm

structural flaw tolerance assessment the fracture toughness (0.15 in.), the gage recommended in Fig. 1 may be used. When

value associated with fracture after some stable tearing has a greater working range is needed, an enlarged gage such as the

occurred. This response is characteristic of ferritic steel in the one shown in Fig. 2 is recommended. Accuracy shall be within

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 4 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

6.3 Load Transducers:

6.3.1 Testing is performed in a testing machine conforming

to the requirements of Practices E 4. Applied load may be

measured by any load transducer capable of being recorded

continuously. Accuracy of load measurements shall be within

61 % of the working range. In calibration, the maximum

deviation of individual data points from a fit to the data shall be

less than 60.2 % of the calibrated range of the transducer when

using elastic compliance, and 61 % otherwise.

6.3.2 For the elastic compliance method, the signal resolu-

tion on load should be at least 1 part in 4000 of the transducer

signal range and signal stability should be 64 parts in 4000 of

the transducer signal range measured over a 10-min period.

Recommended maximum signal noise should be less than 62

parts in 4000 of the transducer signal range.

6.4 System Verification—It is recommended that the perfor-

mance of the load and displacement measuring systems should

be verified before beginning a series of continuous tests.

Calibration accuracy of displacement transducers shall be

verified with due consideration for the temperature and envi-

ronment of the test. Load calibrations shall be conducted

periodically and documented in accordance with the latest

revision of Practices E 4.

6.5 Fixtures:

6.5.1 Bend-Test Fixture—The general principles of the

bend-test fixture are illustrated in Fig. 3. This fixture is

FIG. 2 Clip Gage Design for 8.0 mm (0.3 in.) and More Working

Range

deviation of the individual data points from a fit (linear or

curve) to the data shall be less than 60.2 % of the working

range of the gage when using the elastic compliance method

and 61 % otherwise. Knife edges are required for seating the

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

gage. Parallel alignment of the knife edges shall be maintained

to within 1°. Direct methods for load-line displacement are

described in Refs (2-5).

6.2.2.1 Gage Attachment Methods—The specimen shall be

provided with a pair of accurately machined knife edges that

support the gage arms and serve as the displacement reference

points. These knife edges can be machined integral with the

specimen or they may be attached separately. Experience has FIG. 3 Bend Test Fixture Design

shown that razor blades serve as effective attachable knife

edges. The knife edges shall be positively attached to the designed to minimize frictional effects by allowing the support

specimen to prevent shifting of the knife edges during the test rollers to rotate and move apart slightly as the specimen is

method. Experience has shown that machine screws or spot loaded, thus permitting rolling contact. Thus, the support

welds are satisfactory attachment methods. rollers are allowed limited motion along plane surfaces parallel

6.2.3 For the elastic compliance method, the recommended to the notched side of the specimen, but are initially positively

signal resolution for displacement should be at least 1 part in positioned against stops that set the span length and are held in

32 000 of the transducer signal range, and signal stability place by low-tension springs (such as rubber bands). Fixtures

should be 64 parts in 32 000 of the transducer signal range and rolls shall be made of high hardness (greater than 40 HRC)

measured over a 10-min period. Signal noise should be less steels.

than 62 parts in 32 000 of the transducer signal range. 6.5.2 Tension Testing Clevis:

6.2.4 Gages other than those recommended in 6.2 are 6.5.2.1 A loading clevis suitable for testing compact speci-

permissible if the required accuracy and precision can be met mens is shown in Fig. 4. Both ends of the specimen are held in

or exceeded. such a clevis and loaded through pins, in order to allow rotation

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 5 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

NOTE 1—Corners may be removed as necessary to accomodate the clip gage.

FIG. 4 Tension Testing Clevis Design

of the specimen during testing. In order to provide rolling 7.2 Crack Plane Orientation—The crack plane orientation

contact between the loading pins and the clevis holes, these shall be considered in preparing the test specimen. This is

holes are provided with small flats on the loading surfaces. discussed in Terminology E 1823.

Other clevis designs may be used if it can be demonstrated that 7.3 Alternative Specimens—In certain cases, it may be

they will accomplish the same result as the design shown. desirable to use specimens having W/B ratios other than two.

Clevises and pins should be fabricated from steels of sufficient Suggested alternative proportions for the single-edge bend

strength (greater than 40 HRC) to elastically resist indentation specimen are 1 # W/B # 4 and for the compact (and

of the clevises or pins. diskshaped compact) specimen are 2 # W/B # 4, however, any

6.5.2.2 The critical tolerances and suggested proportions of thickness can be used as long as the qualification requirements

the clevis and pins are given in Fig. 4. These proportions are are met.

based on specimens having W/ B = 2 for B > 12.7 mm (0.5 in.)

7.4 Specimen Precracking—All specimens shall be pre-

and W/B = 4 for B # 12.7 mm. If a 1930-MPa (280 000-psi)

cracked in fatigue. Experience has shown that it is impractical

yield strength maraging steel is used for the clevis and pins,

to obtain a reproducibly sharp, narrow machined notch that

adequate strength will be obtained. If lower-strength grip

material is used, or if substantially larger specimens are will simulate a natural crack well enough to provide a

required at a given sYS/E ratio, then heavier grips will be satisfactory fracture toughness test result. The most effective

required. As indicated in Fig. 4 the clevis corners may be cut artifice for this purpose is a narrow notch from which extends

off sufficiently to accommodate seating of the clip gage in a comparatively short fatigue crack, called the precrack. (A

specimens less than 9.5 mm (0.375 in.) thick. fatigue precrack is produced by cyclically loading the notched

6.5.2.3 Careful attention should be given to achieving good specimen for a number of cycles usually between about 104

alignment through careful machining of all auxiliary gripping and 106 depending on specimen size, notch preparation, and

fixtures. stress intensity level.) The dimensions of the notch and the

precrack, and the sharpness of the precrack shall meet certain

7. Specimen Size, Configuration, and Preparation conditions that can be readily met with most engineering

7.1 Specimen Configurations—The configurations of the materials since the fatigue cracking process can be closely

standard specimens are shown in Annex A1-Annex A3. controlled when careful attention is given to the known

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 6 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

contributory factors. However, there are some materials that a chevron notch (Fig. 5), (3) by statically preloading the

are too brittle to be fatigue-cracked since they fracture as soon specimen in such a way that the notch tip is compressed in a

as the fatigue crack initiates; these are outside the scope of the direction normal to the intended crack plane (to a load not to

present test method. exceed Pf), and (4) by using a negative fatigue load ratio; for

7.4.1 Fatigue Crack Starter Notch—Three forms of fatigue a given maximum fatigue load, the more negative the load

crack starter notches are shown in Fig. 5. To facilitate fatigue ratio, the earlier crack initiation is likely to occur. The peak

cracking at low stress intensity levels, the root radius for a compressive load shall not exceed Pf.

straight-through slot terminating in a V-notch should be 0.08 7.4.5 Fatigue Precracking Procedure— Fatigue precrack-

mm (0.003 in.) or less. If a chevron form of notch is used, the ing can be conducted under either load control or displacement

root radius may be 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) or less. In the case of control. If the load cycle is maintained constant, the maximum

a slot tipped with a hole it will be necessary to provide a sharp K and the K range will increase with crack length; if the

stress raiser at the end of the hole. displacement cycle is maintained constant, the reverse will

7.4.2 Fatigue Crack Length—The crack length (total length happen. The initial value of the maximum fatigue load should

of the crack starter configuration plus the fatigue crack) shall be less than Pf. The specimen shall be accurately located in the

be between 0.45 and 0.70 W for J and d determination, but is loading fixture. Fatigue cycling is then begun, usually with a

restricted to the range from 0.45 to 0.55 for KIc determination. sinusoidal waveform and near to the highest practical fre-

For a straight-through crack starter terminating in a V-notch quency. There is no known marked frequency effect on fatigue

(see Fig. 5), the length of the fatigue crack on each surface of precrack formation up to at least 100 Hz in the absence of

the specimen shall not be less than 2.5 % of W or 1.3 mm (0.05 adverse environments. The specimen should be carefully

in.) minimum, and for a crack starter tipped with a drilled hole monitored until crack initiation is observed on one side. If

(see Fig. 5), the fatigue crack extension from the stress raiser crack initiation is not observed on the other side before

tipping the hole shall not be less than 0.5 D or 1.3 mm (0.05 appreciable growth is observed on the first, then fatigue cycling

in.) minimum on both surfaces of the specimen, where D is the should be stopped to try to determine the cause and find a

diameter of the hole. For a chevron notch crack starter (see Fig. remedy for the unsymmetrical behavior. Sometimes, simply

5), the fatigue crack shall emerge from the chevron on both turning the specimen around in relation to the fixture will solve

surfaces of the specimen. the problem. The length of the fatigue precrack extension from

7.4.3 Equipment—The equipment for fatigue cracking the machined notch shall not be less than 5 % of the total crack

should be such that the stress distribution is uniform through size, ao, and not less than 1.3 mm (0.05 in.). For the final 50 %

the specimen thickness; otherwise the crack will not grow of fatigue precrack extension or 1.3 mm (0.05 in.), whichever

uniformly. The stress distribution should also be symmetrical is less, the maximum load shall be no larger than Pf (defined in

about the plane of the prospective crack; otherwise the crack Annex A1-Annex A3), a load such that the ratio of maximum

may deviate from that plane and the test result can be stress intensity factor to Young’s Modulus is equal to or less

significantly affected. The K calibration for the specimen, if it than 0.0002 m1/2 (0.001 in.1/2) or 70 % of the maximum load

is different from the one given in this test method, shall be achieved during the test, whichever is less. The accuracy of

known with an uncertainty of less than 5 %. Fixtures used for these maximum load values shall be known within 65 %.

precracking should be machined with the same tolerances as When precracking is conducted at a temperature T 1 and testing

those used for testing. at a different temperature T 2, the choice of sY shall take into

7.4.4 Fatigue Loading Requirements—Allowable fatigue consideration the differences in properties at the two tempera-

load values are based on the load P f as defined in Annex tures in order to minimize yielding the specimen during

A1-Annex A3. The fatigue precracking shall be conducted with precracking.

the specimen fully heat-treated to the condition in which it is to 7.5 Side Grooves—Side grooves are highly recommended

be tested. No intermediate treatments between precracking and when the compliance method of crack length prediction is

testing are allowed. The combination of starter notch and used. The specimen may also need side grooves to ensure a

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

fatigue precrack shall conform to the requirements shown in straight crack front as specified in Annex A4-Annex A7. The

Fig. 6. There are several ways of promoting early crack total thickness reduction shall not exceed 0.25 B. A total

initiation: (1) by providing a very sharp notch tip, (2) by using reduction of 0.20 B has been found to work well for many

materials. Any included angle of side groove less than 90° is

allowed. Root radius shall be #0.5 6 0.2 mm (0.02 6 0.01

in.). In order to produce nearly straight fatigue precrack fronts,

the precracking should be performed prior to the side-grooving

operation. BN is the minimum thickness measured at the roots

of the side grooves. The root of the side groove should be

located along the specimen centerline.

8. Procedure

8.1 Objective and Overview:

8.1.1 The overall objective of the test method is to develop

a load-displacement record that can be used to evaluate K, J, or

FIG. 5 Fatigue Crack Starter Notch Configurations CTOD. Two procedures can be used: (1) a basic procedure

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 7 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

NOTE 1—The crack-starter notch shall be centered between the top and bottom specimen edges within 0.005 W.

FIG. 6 Envelope of Fatigue Crack and Crack Starter Notches

directed toward evaluation of a single K, J, or CTOD value 8.2.2.2 Measure the temperature of the specimen during the

without the use of crack extension measurement equipment, or test to an accuracy of 63°C, where the temperature is

(2) a procedure directed toward evaluation of a complete measured on the specimen surface within W/4 from the crack

fracture toughness resistance curve using crack extension tip. (See Test Methods E 21 for suggestions on temperature

measurement equipment. This also includes the evaluation of measurement.)

single-point toughness values. 8.2.2.3 For the duration of the test, the difference between

8.1.2 The basic procedure utilizes a load versus displace- the indicated temperature and the nominal test temperature

ment plot and is directed toward obtaining a single fracture shall not exceed 63°C.

toughness value such as K1c, Jc, or dc. Optical crack measure- 8.2.2.4 The term “indicated temperature” means the tem-

ments are utilized to obtain both the initial and final physical perature that is indicated by the temperature measuring device

crack sizes in this procedure. Multiple specimens can be used using good-quality pyrometric practice.

to evaluate J at the initiation of ductile cracking, J1c, or d1c.

NOTE 2—It is recognized that specimen temperature may vary more

8.1.3 The resistance curve procedure utilizes an elastic than the indicated temperature. The permissible indicated temperature

unloading procedure or equivalent procedure to obtain a J- or variations in 8.2.2.3 are not to be construed as minimizing the importance

CTOD-based resistance curve from a single specimen. Crack of good pyrometric practice and precise temperature control. All labora-

length is measured from compliance in this procedure and tories should keep both indicated and specimen temperature variations as

verified by posttest optical crack length measurements. An small as practicable. It is well recognized, in view of the dependency of

alternative procedure using the normalization method is pre- fracture toughness of materials on temperature, that close temperature

control is necessary. The limits prescribed represent ranges that are

sented in Annex A15: Normalization Data Reduction Tech-

common practice.

nique.

8.1.4 Three or more determinations of the fracture tough- 8.3 Alignment:

ness parameter are suggested to ascertain the effects of material 8.3.1 Bend Testing—Set up the bend test fixture so that the

and test system variability. line of action of the applied load passes midway between the

8.2 System and Specimen Preparation: support roll centers within 61 % of the distance between the

8.2.1 Specimen Measurement—Measure the dimensions, centers. Measure the span to within 60.5 % of the nominal

BN, B, W, H* , and d to the nearest 0.050 mm (0.002 in.) or length. Locate the specimen so that the crack tip is midway

0.5 %, whichever is larger. between the rolls to within 1 % of the span and square the roll

8.2.2 Specimen Temperature: axes within 62°.

8.2.2.1 The temperature of the specimen shall be stable and 8.3.1.1 When the load-line displacement is referenced from

uniform during the test. Hold the specimen at test temperature the loading jig there is potential for introduction of error from

63°C for 1⁄2 h/25 mm of specimen thickness. two sources. They are the elastic compression of the fixture as

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 8 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

the load increases and indentation of the specimen at the and extending to 0.005 W from the root of the side groove or

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

loading points. Direct methods for load-line displacement surface of smooth-sided specimens. Calculate the original

measurement are described in Refs (3-6). If a remote trans- crack size, ao, and the final physical crack size, ap, as follows:

ducer is used for load-line displacement measurement, take average the two near-surface measurements, combine the result

care to exclude the elastic displacement of the load-train with the remaining seven crack length measurements and

measurement and brinelling displacements at the load points determine the average. The measuring instrument shall have an

(7). accuracy of 0.025 mm (0.001 in.).

8.3.2 Compact Testing—Loading pin friction and eccentric- 8.5.4 None of the nine measurements of original crack size

ity of loading can lead to errors in fracture toughness determi- and final physical crack size may differ by more than 5 % from

nation. The centerline of the upper and lower loading rods the average physical crack size defined in 8.5.3.

should be coincident within 0.25 mm (0.01 in.). Center the 8.6 Resistance Curve Procedure:

specimen with respect to the clevis opening within 0.76 mm 8.6.1 The resistance curve procedure involves using an

(0.03 in.). Seat the displacement gage in the knife edges firmly elastic compliance technique or other technique to obtain the J

by wiggling the gage lightly. or CTOD resistance curve from a single specimen test. The

8.4 Basic Procedure—Load all specimens under displace- elastic compliance technique is described here, while the

ment gage or machine crosshead or actuator displacement normalization technique is described in Annex A15.

control. If a loading rate that exceeds that specified here is 8.6.2 Load the specimens under the displacement gage or

desired, please refer to Annex Annex A14: Special Require- machine crosshead or actuator displacement control. Load the

ments for Rapid-Load J-Integral Fracture Toughness Testing. specimens at a rate such that the time taken to reach the load

8.4.1 The basic procedure involves loading a specimen to a Pf lies between 0.1 and 10.0 min. The time to perform an

selected displacement level and determining the amount of unload/reload sequence should be as needed to accurately

crack extension that occurred during loading. estimate crack length, but not more than 10 min. If a higher

8.4.2 Load specimens at a constant rate such that the time loading rate is desired, please refer to Annex Annex A14:

taken to reach the load Pf lies between 0.1 and 10.0 min. Special Requirements for Rapid-Load J-Integral Fracture

8.4.3 If the test ends by a fracture instability, measure the Toughness Testing.

initial crack length and any ductile crack extension by the 8.6.3 Take each specimen individually through the follow-

procedure in Section 9. Ductile crack extension may be ing steps:

difficult to distinguish but should be defined on one side by the 8.6.3.1 Measure compliance to estimate the original crack

fatigue precrack and on the other by the brittle region. Proceed length, ao, using unloading/reloading sequences in a load range

to Section 9 to evaluate fracture toughness in terms of K, J, or from 0.5 to 1.0 times the maximum precracking load. Estimate

CTOD. a provisional initial crack size, aoq, from at least three

8.4.4 If stable tearing occurs, test additional specimens to unloading/reloading sequences. No individual value shall differ

evaluate an initiation value of the toughness. Use the procedure from the mean by more than 60.002 W.

in 8.5 to evaluate the amount of stable tearing that has occurred 8.6.3.2 Proceed with the test using unload/reload sequences

and thus determine the displacement levels needed in the that produce crack extension measurements at intervals pre-

additional tests. Five or more points favorably positioned are scribed by the applicable data analysis section of Annex A8 or

required to generate an R curve for evaluating an initiation Annex A10. Note that at least eight data points are required

point. See Annex A9 and Annex A11 to see how points shall be before specimen achieves maximum load. If fracture instability

positioned for evaluating an initiation toughness value. is an expected response, then it may be helpful to load the

8.5 Optical Crack Length Measurement: specimen monotonically over the range Pf< P < PQ. (See Annex

8.5.1 After unloading the specimen, mark the crack accord- A5 for a definition of PQ). If crack length values change

ing to one of the following methods. For steels and titanium negatively by more than 0.005 ao(backup), stop the test and

alloys, heat tinting at about 300°C (570°F) for 30 min works check the alignment of the loading train. Crack length values

well. For other materials, fatigue cycling can be used. The use determined at loads lower than the maximum precracking load

of liquid penetrants is not recommended. For both recom- should be ignored.

mended methods, the beginning of stable crack extension is 8.6.3.3 For many materials, load relaxation may occur prior

marked by the end of the flat fatigue precracked area. The end to conducting compliance measurements, causing a time-

of crack extension is marked by the end of heat tint or the dependent nonlinearity in the unloading slope. One method

beginning of the second flat fatigue area. that may be used to remedy this effect is to hold the specimen

8.5.2 Break the specimen to expose the crack, with care for a period of time until the load becomes stable at a constant

taken to minimize additional deformation. Cooling ferritic steel displacement prior to initiating the unloading.

specimens to ensure brittle behavior may be helpful. Cooling 8.6.3.4 The maximum recommended range of unload/reload

nonferritic materials may help to minimize deformation during for crack extension measurement should not exceed either

final fracture. 50 % of Pf or 50 % of the current load, whichever is smaller.

8.5.3 Along the front of the fatigue crack and the front of the 8.6.3.5 After completing the final unloading cycle, return

marked region of stable crack extension, measure the size of the load to zero without additional crosshead displacement

the original crack and the final physical crack size at nine beyond the then current maximum displacement.

equally spaced points centered about the specimen centerline 8.6.3.6 After unloading the specimen, use the procedure in

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 9 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

8.5 to optically measure the crack lengths. 9.2 Fracture Instability—When the test terminates with a

8.7 Alternative Methods: fracture instability, evaluate whether the fracture occurred

8.7.1 Alternative methods of measuring crack extension, before stable tearing or after stable tearing. The beginning of

such as the electric potential drop method, are allowed. stable tearing is defined in A6.3 and A7.3. For fracture

Methods shall meet the qualification criteria given in 9.1.5.2. instability occurring before stable tearing proceed to Annex

8.7.2 If displacement measurements are made in a plane A5, Annex A6, and Annex A7 to evaluate the toughness values

other than that containing the load line, the ability to infer in terms of K, J, or CTOD. For fracture instability occurring

load-line displacement shall be demonstrated using the test after stable tearing, proceed to Annex A5, Annex A6, and

material under similar test temperatures and conditions. In- Annex A7 to evaluate toughness values and then go to 9.3 to

ferred load-line displacement values shall be accurate to within evaluate stable tearing.

61 %. 9.3 Stable Tearing:

9.3.1 Basic Procedure—When the basic procedure is used,

9. Analysis of Results

only an initiation toughness can be evaluated. Proceed to

9.1 Qualification of Data—The data shall meet the follow- Annex A9 and Annex A11 to evaluate initiation toughness

ing requirements to be qualified according to this test method. values.

If the data do not pass these requirements, no fracture tough- 9.3.2 Resistance Curve Procedure—When the resistance

ness measures can be determined in accordance with this test curve procedure is used, refer to Annex A8 and Annex A10 to

method. develop the R curves. Proceed to Annex A9 and Annex A11 to

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

NOTE 3—This section contains the requirements for qualification that develop initiation values of toughness.

are common for all tests. Additional qualification requirements are given

with each type of test in the Annexes as well as requirements for 10. Report

determining whether the fracture toughness parameter developed is

insensitive to in-plane dimensions. 10.1 A recommended table for reporting results is given Fig.

9.1.1 All requirements on the test equipment in Section 6 7 and Fig. 8.

shall be met. 10.2 Report the following information for each fracture

9.1.2 All requirements on machining tolerance and pre- toughness determination:

cracking in Section 7 shall be met. 10.2.1 Type of test specimen and orientation of test speci-

9.1.3 All requirements on fixture alignment, test rate, and men according to Terminology E 1823 identification codes,

temperature stability and accuracy in Section 8 shall be met. 10.2.2 Material designation (ASTM, AISI, SAE, and so

9.1.4 The following crack size requirements shall be met in forth), material product form (plate, forging, casting, and so

all tests. forth), and material yield and tensile strength (at test tempera-

9.1.4.1 Original Crack Size—None of the nine physical tures),

measurements of initial crack size defined in 8.5.3 shall differ 10.2.3 Specimen dimensions (8.2.1), Thickness B and BN,

by more than 5 % from the average, ao. and Width W,

9.1.4.2 Final Crack Size—None of the nine physical mea- 10.2.4 Test temperature (8.2.2), loading rate (8.4.2 and

surements of final physical crack size, a p, defined in 8.5.3 shall 8.6.2), and type of loading control,

differ by more than 5 % from the average. In subsequent tests,

10.2.5 Fatigue precracking conditions (7.4), Kmax, DK

the side-groove configuration may be modified within the

range, and fatigue precrack length (average),

requirements of 7.5 to facilitate meeting this requirement.

9.1.5 The following crack size requirements shall be met in 10.2.6 Load-displacement record and associated calcula-

the tests using the resistance curve procedure of 8.6. tions (Section 9),

9.1.5.1 Crack Extension—None of the nine physical mea- 10.2.7 Original measured crack length (8.5), original pre-

surements of crack extension shall be less than 50 % of the dicted crack length, aoq, final measured crack length, final

average crack extension. predicted crack length, afq, physical crack extension during

9.1.5.2 Crack Extension Prediction—The crack extension test, crack front appearance—straightness and planarity, and

predicted from elastic compliance (or other method) at the last fracture appearance,

unloading shall be compared with the measured physical crack 10.2.8 Qualification of fracture toughness measurement

extension. The difference between these shall not exceed 0.15 (Annex A4-Annex A7 and Annex A8-Annex A11), based on

D ap for crack extensions less than 0.2 bo, and the difference size requirements, and based on crack extension, and

shall not exceed 0.03 bo thereafter. 10.2.9 Qualified values of fracture toughness.

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 10 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

the absence of such a true value no meaningful statement can

be made concerning bias of data.

11.2 Precision—The precision of any of the various fracture

toughness determinations cited in this test method is a function

of the precision and bias of the various measurements of linear

dimensions of the specimen and testing fixtures, the precision

of the displacement measurement, the bias of the load mea-

surement as well as the bias of the recording devices used to

produce the load-displacement record, and the precision of the

constructions made on this record. It is not possible to make

meaningful statements concerning precision and bias for all

these measurements. However, it is possible to derive useful

information concerning the precision of fracture toughness

measurements in a global sense from interlaboratory test

programs. Most of the measures of fracture toughness that can

be determined by this procedure have been evaluated by an

interlaboratory test program. The KIc was evaluated in (8), JIc

was evaluated in (9), the J-R curve was evaluated in (10), and

the measures of dc and dm were evaluated in a research report.4

In addition, the overall analysis procedures of this test method

were evaluated in an interlaboratory test program.

12. Keywords

12.1 crack initiation; crack-tip opening displacement;

CTOD; ductile fracture; elastic-plastic fracture toughness;

fracture instability; J-integral; KIc; plane strain fracture tough-

ness; resistance curve; stable crack growth

11.1 Bias—There is no accepted “standard” value for any of 4

Data on the round-robin results are on file at ASTM Headquarters. Request

the fracture toughness criteria employed in this test method. In RR:E24-1013.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 11 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

ANNEXES

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

(Mandatory Information)

Pf 5 S (A1.1)

A1.1 Specimen

See 7.4.5 for fatigue precracking requirements.

A1.1.1 The standard bend specimen is a single edge-

notched and fatigue-cracked beam loaded in three-point bend- A1.4 Calculation

ing with a support span, S, nominally equal to four times the A1.4.1 Calculation of K—For the bend specimen at a load,

width, W. The general proportions of the specimen configura- P(i), calculate Kas follows:

F G

tion are shown in Fig. A1.1. PiS

A1.1.2 Alternative specimens may have 1 # W/B # 4. K ~i! 5 f~ai /W! (A1.2)

~BBN! 1/2W3/2

These specimens shall also have a nominal support span equal

to 4W. where:

3~ai/W! 1/2 @1.99 2 ~ai/W! ~1 2 a i/W! (A1.3)

A1.2 Apparatus 2

3 ~2.15 2 3.93~ai/W! 1 2.7 ~ai/W! !#

A1.2.1 For generally applicable specifications concerning f~ai/W! 5

2~1 1 2ai/W!~1 2 a i/W!3/2

the bend-test fixture and displacement gage see 6.5.1 and 6.2.

A1.4.2 Calculation of J:

A1.3 Specimen Preparation: NOTE A1.2—In the calculation of J for the bend specimen a load-line

A1.3.1 For generally applicable specifications concerning displacement is required. For evaluating crack length, a crack mouth

displacement is used.

specimen configuration and preparation see Section 7.

A1.3.2 All specimens shall be precracked in three-point For the single edge bend specimen, calculate J as follows:

bending fatigue based upon the load Pf, as follows: J 5 Jel 1 J pl (A1.4)

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 12 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

NOTE 1—The two side planes and the two edge planes shall be parallel and perpendicular as applicable to within 0.5°.

NOTE 2—The machined notch shall be perpendicular to specimen length and thickness to within 62°.

FIG. A1.1 Recommended Single Edge Bend [SE(B)] Specimen

Jel = elastic component of J, and plastic area under the load versus load-line displacement record

Jpl = plastic component of J. between lines of constant displacement at points i−1 and i

A1.4.2.1 J Calculations for the Basic Test Method—At a shown in Fig. A1.3. The quantity Jpl(i) represents the total crack

point corresponding to v and P on the specimen load versus

load-line displacement, calculate as follows:

Method

FIG. A1.3 Definition of Plastic Area for Resistance Curve J

Calculation

K2 ~ 1 2 v 2 !

J5 E 1 Jpl (A1.5)

growth corrected plastic J at point i and is obtained in two steps

where K is from A1.4.1 with a = ao, and

by first incrementing the existing J pl(i-1) and then by modifying

2Apl the total accumulated result to account for the crack growth

Jpl 5 B b

N o increment. Accurate evaluation of Jpl(i) from the Eq A1.7

where: relationship requires small and uniform crack growth incre-

Apl = area as shown in Fig. A1.2, ments consistent with the suggested elastic compliance spacing

BN = net specimen thickness (BN = B if no side grooves are present), of Annex A8 and Annex A10. The quantity Apl(i) can be

and calculated from the following equation:

bo = W − a o.

Apl~i! 5 Apl~i21! 1 @P~i! 1 P ~i21!# @vpl~i! 2 vpl~i21!#/2 (A1.8)

A1.4.2.2 J Calculations for the Resistance Curve Test

Method—At a point corresponding to a (i), v(i), and P(i) on the where:

specimen load versus plastic load-line displacement calculate vpl(i) = plastic part of the load-line displacement = v (i) −

as follows: (P (i)CLL (i))), and

CLL(i) = slope, (Dv/DP) (i), required to give the current crack length,

~K~i!! 2 ~1 2 v2! ai.

J ~i! 5 E 1 J pl~i! (A1.6)

CLL(i) can be determined from knowledge of ai/W using the

where K(i) is from A1.4.1, and following equation:

F

Jpl~i! 5 J pl~i21! 1 b

2

S DS

~i21!

Apl~i! 2 A pl~i21!

BN DG F· 12 b ~i21! G

a~i! 2 a~i21! 1

C LLi 5 E B W 2 a

e

SS

i

2

D

@1.193 2 1.98~a i/W! 1 4.478~ai/W!2

(A1.7) 2 4.443~a i/W!3 1 1.739~ai/W!4# (A1.9)

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 13 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

where: K 2 ~ 1 2 n2 ! r p~W 2 ao!v pl

Be = B − (B − BN) 2/B d5 2sYSE 1 @rp ~W 2 ao! 1 a o 1 z# (A1.12)

curve test method using an elastic compliance technique on ao = original crack length,

single edge bend specimens with crack opening displacements K = stress intensity factor as defined in A1.4.1 with a = a o,

measured at the notched edge, the crack length is given as n = Poisson’s ratio,

sYS = yield or 0.2 % offset yield strength at the temperature of

follows:

interest,

ai/W 5 @0.999748 2 3.9504u 1 2.9821u 2 2 3.21408u3 E = elastic modulus at the test temperature,

1 51.51564u 4 2 113.031u5# (A1.10) vpl = plastic component of crack mouth opening displacement at the

point of evaluation on the load-displacement curve, vc, vi, vu,

where: or vm,

1 z = distance of knife edge measurement point from the notched

F G

u 5 B WEC 1/2 (A1.11) edge on the single edge bend specimen, and

e i

S/4 11 rp = plastic rotation factor = 0.44.

Ci = (Dvm/DP) on an unloading/reloading sequence, Test Method—For the resistance curve test method, calcula-

vm = crack opening displacement at notched edge, tions of CTOD for any point on the load-displacement curve

Be = B − (B − BN)2/B . are made from the following expression:

NOTE A1.3—Crack length on a single edge bend specimen is normally

determined from crack opening compliance. It can be determined from K~2i!~1 2 v2! @rp~W 2 a ~i!! 1 Da#vpl~i!

d ~i! 5 2s YSE 1 @rp ~W 2 a ~i!! 1 a ~i! 1 z# (A1.13)

load-line compliance if the correct calibration is available.

A1.4.4 Other compliance equations are acceptable if the where:

resulting accuracy is equal to or greater than those described a (i) = current crack length,

and the accuracy has been verified experimentally. Da = a (i) − ao,

A1.4.5 Calculation of CTOD: K (i) = stress intensity factor as defined in A1.4.1 with a = a (i), and

the other terms are defined in A1.4.5.1.

A1.4.5.1 Calculation of CTOD for the Basic Test Method—

For the basic test method, calculations of CTOD for any point

on the load-displacement curve are made from the following

expression:

A2.1.1 The standard compact specimen, C(T), is a single

edge-notched and fatigue cracked plate loaded in tension. Two A2.4 Calculation

specimen geometries which have been used successfully for J A2.4.1 Calculation of K—For the compact specimen at a

testing are shown in Fig. A2.1. load P (i), calculate K as follows:

A2.1.2 The compact specimen in Fig. A2.2 has generally

Pi

been used only for KIc testing; it has no provision for load-line K ~i! 5 f~a i/W! (A2.2)

displacement measurement. Do not use this specimen for ~BBNW!1/2

ductile fracture toughness measurement. Use it only when with:

KIcbehavior is expected.

@~2 1 a i/W! ~0.886 1 4.64~ai/W! (A2.3)

A2.1.3 Alternative specimens may have 2 # W/B # 4 but

2 3 4

with no change in other proportions. 2 13.32~ai/W! 1 14.72~ai/W! 2 5.6~a i/W! !#

f~ai/W! 5

~1 2 ai/W! 3/2

A2.2 Apparatus

A2.4.2 Calculation of J—For the compact specimen calcu-

A2.2.1 For generally applicable specifications concerning

late J as follows:

the loading clevis and displacement gage, see 6.5.2 and 6.2.

J 5 Jel 1 J pl (A2.4)

A2.3 Specimen Preparation

where:

A2.3.1 For generally applicable specifications concerning Jel = elastic component of J, and

specimen size and preparation see Section 7. Jpl = plastic component of J.

A2.3.2 All specimens shall be precracked in fatigue at a A2.4.2.1 J Calculations for the Basic Test Method—For the

load value based upon the load Pf as follows: compact specimen at a point corresponding to v, P on the

0.4Bb2osY specimen load versus load-line displacement record calculate

Pf 5 (A2.1)

~2W 1 ao! as follows:

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 14 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

FIG. A2.1 Two Compact Specimen Designs That Have Been Used Successfully for Fracture Toughness Testing

J5 E 1 Jpl (A2.5)

Apl = Area A as shown in Fig. A1.2,

where: BN = net specimen thickness (BN = B if no side grooves

K is from A2.4.1 with a = ao, and are present),

bo = uncracked ligament, (W − a o), and

hA pl h = 2 + 0.522bo/W.

Jpl 5 B b (A2.6)

N o

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 15 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- E 1820

NOTE 1—A surfaces shall be perpendicular and parallel as applicable to within 0.002 W TIR.

NOTE 2—The intersection of the crack starter notch tips with the two specimen surfaces shall be equally distant from the top and bottom edges of the

specimen within 0.005 W.

NOTE 3—Integral or attachable knife edges for clip gage attachment to the crack mouth may be used.

NOTE 4—For starter-notch and fatigue-crack configuration see Fig. 6.

FIG. A2.2 Compact Specimen for KIc Testing

A2.4.2.2 J Calculation for the Resistance Curve Test spacing of Annex A8 and Annex A10. The quantity Apl(i) can be

Method—For the C(T)specimen at a point corresponding a (i), calculated from the following equation:

v(i), and P(i) on the specimen load versus load-line displace- @P~i! 1 P~i21!# @ vpl~i! 2 v pl~i21!#

ment record calculate as follows: Apl~i! 5 Apl~i21! 1 2 (A2.9)

~K~i!! 2 ~1 2 n2!

J ~i! 5 1 J pl~i! (A2.7) where:

E

vpl(i) = plastic part of the load-line displacement, vi − (P

where K(i) is from A2.4.1, and: (i)CLL(i)), and

F

J pl~i! 5 Jpl~i21! 1 b S D

h ~i21! Apl~i! 2 Apl~i21!

BN G CLL(i) = compliance, (Dv/DP)i required to give the current

crack length, ai.

F G

~i21!

a~i! 2 a~i21! CLL(i) can be determined from knowledge of ai/W using the

· 1 2 g~i21! b (A2.8) following equation:

~i21!

where:

h(i−1) = 2.0 + 0.522 b(i−1)/W, and e

S

1 W 1 ai 2

CLL~i! 5 EB W 2 a

i

D

@2.1630 1 12.219~a i/W!

2 20.065~ai/W! 2 0.9925~a i/W!3

2

g(i−1) = 1.0 + 0.76 b( i−1)/W.

1 20.609~ai/W!4 2 9.9314~a i/W!5# (A2.10)

In Eq A2.8, the quantity Apl(i)− Apl(i-1) is the increment of where:

plastic area under the load versus plastic load-line displace-

~B 2 BN!2

ment record between lines of constant displacement at points Be 5 B 2 B (A2.11)

i−1 and i shown in Fig. A1.3. The quantity Jpl(i) represents the

total crack growth corrected plastic J at point i and is obtained In an elastic compliance test, the rotation corrected compli-

in two steps by first incrementing the existing Jpl(i−1) and then ance, Cc(i), described in A2.4.4 shall be used instead of CLL (i)

by modifying the total accumulated result to account for the in Eq A2.10.

crack growth increment. Accurate evaluation of J pl(i) from the A2.4.3 Calculation of Crack Length—For a single speci-

above relationship requires small and uniform crack growth men test method using an elastic compliance technique on the

increments consistent with the suggested elastic compliance compact specimen with crack opening displacements measured

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 16 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

on the load line, the crack length is given as follows:

ai/W 5 @1.000196 2 4.06319u 1 11.242u 2 2 106.043u3

1 464.335u 4 2 650.677u5# (A2.12)

where:

1

u5 (A2.13)

@BeECc~i!#1/2 1 1

ance (Dv/D P) on an unloading/reloading sequence

corrected for rotation (see A2.4.4),

Be = B − (B − B N)2/B.

A2.4.4 To account for crack opening displacement in C(T)

specimens, the crack length estimation shall be corrected for

rotation. Compliance is corrected as follows:

Ci

F GF G

Cc~i! 5 H* D (A2.14)

R sinui 2 cosui R sinu i 2 cosui

Ci = measured specimen elastic compliance (at the load-

line),

H* = initial half-span of the load points (center of the pin

holes),

R = radius of rotation of the crack centerline, (W + a)/2,

where a is the updated crack length,

D = one half of the initial distance between the displace-

ment measurement points,

u = angle of rotation of a rigid body element about the

unbroken midsection line, or

FS DG

FIG. A2.3 Elastic Compliance Correction for Specimen Rotation

dm

u 5 sin21

2 1D

~D 1 R 2!1/2

2

D

SD

2 tan21 R , and (A2.15) where:

ao = original crack length,

K = stress intensity factor as defined in A2.4.1 with

dm = total measured load-line displacement. a = a o,

n = Poisson’s ratio,

A2.4.5 Other compliance equations are acceptable if the sYS = yield or 0.2 % offset yield strength at the tempera-

resulting accuracy is equal to or greater than those described ture of interest,

and the accuracy has been verified experimentally. E = elastic modulus at the test temperature,

A2.4.6 Calculation of CTOD: vpl = plastic component of clip gage opening displace-

A2.4.6.1 Calculation of CTOD for the Basic Test Method— ment at the point of evaluation on the load-

For the basic test method, calculations of CTOD for any point displacement curve, vc, vu, or vm,

z = distance of knife-edge measurement point from the

on the load-displacement curve are made from the following

load-line on the C(T) specimen, and

expression: rp = plastic rotation factor = 0.4 (1 + a),

K~2i!~1 2 n 2! @rp~W 2 ao!# vpl~i! where:

FS D G S D

d~i! 5 2sYSE 1 @rp ~W 2 a o! 1 ao 1 z# (A2.16)

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

ao 2 ao 1 1/2 ao 1

a52 bo 1b 12 22 b 12 (A2.17)

o o

Test Method—For the resistance curve test method, calcula-

tions of CTOD for any point on the load-displacement curve

are made from the following expression:

K~2i!~1 2 n2! @rp~i!~W 2 a ~i!! 1 Da#vpl~i!

d ~i! 5 2s YSE 1 @rp~i!~W 2 a ~i!! 1 a ~i! 1 z# (A2.18)

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 17 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

where: where

Da = a (i) − ao,

K (i) = stress intensity factor as defined in A2.4.1, with

a = a (i), and

a~i! 5 2 FS D a~i!

b~i!

2 a~i! 1

1b 12

~i!

G S

1/2 a~i! 1

22 b 12

~i!

D (A2.19)

rp(i) = plastic rotation factor = 0.4 (1 + a (i)), and the other terms are defined in A2.4.6.1.

A3.1.1 The standard disk-shaped compact specimen, A3.4.1 Measurement— The analysis assumes the specimen

DC(T), is a single edge-notched and fatigue cracked plate was machined from a circular blank, and, therefore, measure-

loaded in tension. The specimen geometry which has been used ments of circularity as well as width, W; crack length, a; and

successfully is shown in Fig. A3.1. thicknesses, B and BN , shall be made. Measure the dimensions

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

NOTE 1—All surfaces shall be perpendicular and parallel as applicable within 0.002 W TIR.

NOTE 2—The intersection of the crack starter notch tips on each surface of the specimen shall be equally distant within 0.005W from the centerline

of the loading holes.

NOTE 3—Integral or attached knife edges for clip gage attachment to the crack mouth may be used.

NOTE 4—For starter-notch and fatigue-crack configuration see Fig. 6.

NOTE 5—Required circularity measurements shall be made at eight equally spaced points around the circumference. One of these points shall be the

notch plane. Average the readings to obtain the radius. All values shall be within 5 % of the average.

FIG. A3.1 Disk-Shaped Compact Specimen, DC(T), Standard Proportions and Dimensions

A3.1.2 Alternative specimens may have 2 # W/B # 4 but BN and B to the nearest 0.05 mm (0.002 in.) or 0.5 %,

with no change in other proportions. whichever is larger.

A3.4.1.1 The specimen blank shall be checked for circular-

A3.2 Apparatus

ity before specimen machining. Measure the diameter at eight

A3.2.1 For generally applicable specifications concerning equally spaced points around the circumference of the speci-

the loading clevis and displacement gage see 6.5.2 and 6.2. men blank. One of these measurements shall lie in the intended

notch plane. Average these readings to obtain the diameter, D.

A3.3 Specimen Preparation

If any measurement differs from the average diameter, D, by

A3.3.1 For generally applicable specifications concerning more than 5 %, machine the blank to the required circularity.

specimen size and preparation, see Section 7. Otherwise, D = 1.35 W.

A3.3.2 All specimens shall be precracked in fatigue at a

A3.4.1.2 Measure the width, W, and the crack length, a,

load value based upon the load Pf as follows:

from the plane of the centerline of the loading holes (the

0.4Bb2osY notched edge is a convenient reference line but the distance

Pf 5 (A3.1)

~2W 1 ao! from the centerline of the holes to the notched edge must be

See 7.4 for precracking requirements. subtracted to determine W and a). Measure the width, W, to the

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 18 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

nearest 0.05 mm (0.002 in.) or 0.5 %, whichever is larger. account for the crack growth increment. Accurate evaluation of

Jpl(i) from the preceding relationship requires small and uni-

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

A3.5 Calculation form crack growth increments consistent with the suggested

A3.5.1 Calculation of K—For the DC(T) specimen at a load elastic compliance spacing of Annex A8 and Annex A10. The

P(i), calculate Kas follows: quantity Apl(i) can be calculated from the following equation:

Pi @P~i! 1 P ~i21!# @vpl~i! 2 vpl~i21!#

K ~i! 5 f~a i/W! (A3.2) Apl~i! 5 A pl~i21! 1 2 (A3.9)

~BBNW!1/2

where: where:

@~2 1 a i/W! ~0.76 1 4.8~ai/W! 2 11.58~a i/W! 2

(A3.3) vpl(i) = plastic part of the load-line displacement, vi −

3 4

(PiCLL(i)), and

1 11.43~ai/W! 2 4.08~a i/W! !# CLL(i) = compliance, (Dv/DP)i required to give the current

f~ai/W! 5

~1 2 ai/W! 3/2 crack length, ai.

A3.5.2 Calculation of J—For the DC(T) specimen, calcu- For test methods that do not utilize the elastic compliance

late J as follows: techniques, CLL(i) can be determined from knowledge of a(i)/W

J 5 Jel 1 J pl (A3.4) using the following equation:

where:

Jel = elastic component of J, and

1

CLL~i! 5 EB

e

S 1 1 a~i!/W

1 2 a ~i!/W D 2

A3.5.2.1 J Calculation for the Basic Test Method—For the 1 6.1748~a ~i!/W!3# (A3.10)

DC(T) specimen at a point corresponding to v(i), P(i) on the

where:

specimen load versus load-line displacement record calculate Be = B − (B − B N)2/B.

as follows:

In an elastic compliance test, the rotation corrected compli-

K2~1 2 n 2! ance, Cc(i), described in A3.5.4 shall be used instead of CLL(i)

J5 E 1 Jpl (A3.5)

given above.

where K is from A3.5.1 with a = ao, and A3.5.3 Calculation of Crack Length—For a single-

hApl specimen test method using an elastic compliance technique on

Jpl 5 B b (A3.6) DC(T) specimens with crack opening displacements measured

N o

at the load-line, the crack length is given as follows:

where:

Apl = Area A as shown in Fig. A1.2, a ~i!/W 5 0.998193 2 3.88087u 1 00.187106u 2

BN = net specimen thickness (BN = B if no side grooves 1 20.3714u3 2 45.2125u 4 1 44.5270u5 (A3.11)

are present),

where:

bo = uncracked ligament, (W − a o), and

h = 2 + 0.522bo/W. u5

1

(A3.12)

A3.5.2.2 J Calculation for the Resistance Curve Test @~BeECc~i!!1/2 1 1#

Method—For the DC(T) specimen at a point corresponding to

ai, vi, and Pi on the specimen load versus load-line displace- where:

ment record, calculate as follows: Cc (i) = specimen crack opening compliance (Dv/DP) on

an unloading/reloading sequence, corrected for

~K~i!!2 ~1 2 v2! rotation (see A3.5.4),

J ~i! 5 1 J pl~i! (A3.7)

E Be = B − (B − BN) 2/B.

where K(i) is from A3.5.1 and: A3.5.4 To account for crack opening displacement in DC(T)

F S D G

h ~i21! Apl~i! 2 Apl~i21! specimens, the crack size estimation shall be corrected for

J pl~i! 5 Jpl~i21! 1 b BN rotation. Compliance shall be corrected as follows:

F G

~i21!

a ~i! 2 a~i21! Ci

F GF G

1 2 g~i21! b (A3.8) Cc~i! 5 H* D (A3.13)

~i21!

R sinui 2 cosu i R sinui 2 cosui

where:

h(i−1) = 2.0 + 0.522 b (i−1)/W, and where (Fig. A2.3):

g(i−1) = 1.0 + 0.76 b (i−1)/W. Ci = measured specimen elastic compliance (at the load-

In the preceding equation, the quantity Apl(i) − Apl(i−1) is the line),

increment of plastic area under the load versus load-line H* = initial half-span of the load points (center of the pin

displacement record between lines of constant displacement at holes),

points i−1 and i shown in Fig. A1.3. The quantity Jpl(i) R = radius of rotation of the crack centerline, (W + a)/2,

represents the total crack growth corrected plastic J at Point i where a is the updated crack length,

and is obtained in two steps by first incrementing the existing D = one half of the initial distance between the displace-

Jpl(i−1) and then by modifying the total accumulated result to ment measurement points,

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 19 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

u = angle of rotation of a rigid body element about the vpl = plastic component of clip gage opening displace-

unbroken midsection line, or ment at the point of evaluation on the load-

F S D G

dm displacement curve, vc, vu, or vm,

2 1D

SDD z = distance of knife edge measurement point from the

u 5 sin21 2 tan21 R , and (A3.14) load-line on the C(T) specimen, and

~D 1 R 2!1/2

2

rp = plastic rotation factor = 0.4 (1 + a),

where:

FS D G S D

dm = total measured load-line displacement.

ao 2 ao 1 1/2 ao 1

a52 1b 12 22 b 12 (A3.16)

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

bo o o

A3.5.5 Other compliance equations are acceptable if the

resulting accuracy is equal to or greater than those described A3.5.6.2 Calculation of CTOD for the Resistance Curve

and the accuracy has been verified experimentally. Test Method—For the resistance curve test method, calcula-

A3.5.6 Calculation of CTOD: tions of CTOD for any point on the load-displacement curve

are made from the following expression:

A3.5.6.1 Calculation of CTOD for the Basic Test Method—

For the basic test method calculations of CTOD for any point K~2i!~1 2 n2! @rp~i!~W 2 a ~i!! 1 Da#vpl~i!

on the load-displacement curve are made from the following d ~i! 5 2s YSE 1 @rp~i!~W 2 a ~i!! 1 a ~i! 1 z# (A3.17)

expression:

where:

K~2i!~1 2 n 2! @rp~W 2 ao!# vpl~i! a (i) = current crack length,

d~i! 5 2sYSE 1 @rp ~W 2 a o! 1 ao 1 z# (A3.15)

Da = a (i) − ao,

K (i) = stress intensity factor as defined in A3.5.1, with

where: a = a (i), and

ao = original crack length, rp(i) = plastic rotation factor = 0.4 (1 + a (i)),

K = stress intensity factor as defined in A3.5.1 with

where:

a = a o,

n = Poisson’s ratio,

sYS = yield or 0.2 % offset yield strength at the tempera- a~i! 5 2 FS D a~i!

b ~i!

2 a~i! 1

1b 12

~i!

G S

1/2 a~i! 1

22 b 12

~i!

D (A3.18)

ture of interest,

E = elastic modulus at the test temperature, and the other terms are defined in A3.5.6.1.

NOTE A4.1—Annex A4-Annex A7 through cover methods for evaluat- A4.1.2.1 Draw a line, CB, which is parallel to the initial

ing toughness for fracture instability. slope 0A and that passes through the crack initiation load point

A4.1 Pop-In Crack Propagation: of the pop-in under consideration.

A4.1.1 If the pop-in is attributed to an arrested fracture A4.1.2.2 Draw a second line, that originates at Point C: Line

instability in the plane of the fatigue precrack, the result is CF, and that has 5 % reduced slope from Line CB.

considered to be a characteristic of the material tested. Pop-in A4.1.2.3 Mark the point G, corresponding to the load and

can be assessed by a specific change in compliance, and also a displacement at pop-in crack arrest.

posttest examination of the fracture surfaces. Pop-ins are only A4.1.2.4 When Point G is within the angle BCF, the pop-in

evaluated when the load rises with increasing displacement is judged to be insignificant. (See Fig. A4.1(b).)

after the pop-in. A4.1.2.5 When Point Gis outside the angle BCF, the pop-in

A4.1.2 The following procedure may be used to assess the is significant (see Fig. A4.1(a)). J and d values determined

significance of small pop-ins when the post-test examination

beyond point G are invalid. Calculate values of fracture

indicates that these are associated with arrested fracture insta-

toughness corresponding to the point of onset (vc or v u).

bility in the plane of the fatigue precrack (Refer to Fig. A4.1):

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 20 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

NOTE 1—Slope of Line CF is exaggerated for clarity.

FIG. A4.1 Procedure for Evaluating Significance of Pop-in

A5.1 This annex describes the methods and calculations slope of the linear portion on the plotter shall be between 0.7

required to determine the linear elastic, plane-strain fracture and 1.5.

toughness, KIc, and the associated requirements for qualifying

the data according to this test method. Data meeting all of the A5.3 Calculation of Results—In order to determine KIc in

qualification requirements of 9.1 and those of this annex result accordance with this test method, it is necessary first to

in a size-independent K Ic value. calculate a conditional result, KQ, which involves a construc-

tion on the test record, and then to determine whether this

A5.2 Test Record—Conduct the test following the proce- result is consistent with size and yield strength requirements.

dure in Section 8. Make a test record as shown in Fig. A5.1 The procedure is as follows:

with the load along the vertical axis and crack-mouth displace- A5.3.1 Construct a secant line as shown on Fig. A5.1 with

ment along the horizontal axis. This record can be generated a slope (P/v)5 = 0.95(P/v)o where (P/v)o is the slope of the

autographically during the test or after the test from digitally tangent OA to the initial portion of the data record. This slope

recorded data. If only an autographic record is taken, the initial can be obtained from a slope calculation using digital data or

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 21 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

fit to an autographic record as desired. because it is then possible that KQ bears no relation to KIc.

A5.4.3 Calculate 2.5 (KQ/sYS)2 where sYS is the 0.2 % offset

NOTE A5.1—Slight nonlinearity often occurs at the very beginning of a

record and should be ignored. However, it is important to establish the yield strength in tension (see Test Methods E 8). If this quantity

initial slope of the record with high precision and therefore it is advisable is less than both the specimen thickness, B, and the length of

to minimize this nonlinearity by a preliminary loading and unloading with the initial uncracked ligament, bo, then KQ is equal to KIc.

the maximum load not producing a stress intensity level exceeding that Otherwise, the test is not a qualified and sizeindependent KIc

used in the final stage of fatigue cracking. test. Expressions for calculations of KQ are given in the Annex

The load PQ is then defined as follows: if the load at every A1-Annex A3 appropriate to the specimen being tested.

point on the record that precedes P5 is lower than P5, then P5 A5.4.4 If the test result fails to meet the qualification

is PQ (Fig. A5.1, Type I); if, however, there is a maximum load requirements in 9.1 or in A5.4, or both, it will be necessary to

preceding P5 that exceeds it, then this maximum load is PQ use a larger specimen to determine KIc. The dimensions of the

(Fig. A5.1, Types II and III). larger specimen can be estimated on the basis of KQ but

generally will be at least 1.5 times those of the specimen that

NOTE A5.2—For the Annex A1-Annex A3 specimens over the range

0.45 # a/W # 0.55, the 95 % offset criterion corresponds to an increase

failed to yield a qualified and size-independent KIc value. The

in elastic compliance equivalent to that caused by a crack extension of unqualified KIc test result can be evaluated by the methods of

approximately 2 % of the original remaining ligament, b o or the original Annex A4-Annex A7 and Annex A8-Annex A11 to determine

crack length, a o. whether other measures of fracture toughness can be developed

from this test method.

A5.4 Qualification of KQ as KIc:

A5.4.1 For KQ to be qualified as a KIc value it must meet the A5.5 Significance of KIc—The property KIc determined by

qualification requirements of 9.1. To be a size-independent K this test method characterizes the resistance of a material to

value, it must meet the following requirements: fracture in a neutral environment in the presence of a sharp

A5.4.2 Calculate the ratio Pmax/PQ, where Pmax is the crack under severe tensile constraint, such that the state of

maximum load the specimen was able to sustain (see Fig. stress near the crack front approaches tritensile plane strain,

A5.1). If this ratio does not exceed 1.10, proceed to calculate and the crack-tip plastic region is small compared to both the

KQ as described in Annex A1-Annex A3 using the formula crack size and to the specimen dimension in the constraint

appropriate to the specimen being tested. If Pmax/PQ does direction. A KIc value is believed to represent the lower limiting

exceed 1.10, then the test is not a size-independent KIc test value of fracture toughness.

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 22 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

fracture toughness values based on J, Jc, or Ju, for a fracture

instability and the associated requirements for qualifying the

data according to this test method. Data meeting all of the

qualification requirements of 9.1 and those of this annex result

in qualified values of Jc or Ju. Data meeting the size require-

ment result in a value of Jc that is insensitive to the in-plane

dimensions of the specimen.

A6.2 Fracture Instability Before Stable Tearing—When

fracture occurs before stable tearing a single-point toughness

value may be obtained labeled Jc.

A6.2.1 J is calculated at the final point, instability, using the

J formulas for the basic method. (Note: These formulas must

be applied for evaluating J no matter which method was used FIG. A6.1 Strength Limits Within Which Use of M = 50 is Justified

in the test because a resistance curve was not obtained.) This for Ferritic Steels.

point is labeled JQc, a provisional Jc value.

A6.2.2 Qualification of JQc as Jc—JQc = Jc, a measure of described in Annex A8-Annex A11).

fracture toughness at instability without significant stable crack

extension that is independent of in-plane dimensions, provided A6.3.1 J is calculated at the final point where instability

the following two conditions are both met: ( 1) if the material occurs using the J formulas for the basic method. These

is a ferritic steel and the measured room temperature yield and formulas must be used for evaluating a single J value no matter

tensile strength fall within the box illustrated in Fig. A6.1, B, bo which method was used in the test. This point is a Ju value.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

$ 50 JQ/s Y, otherwise B, bo $ 100 JQ/sY, and ( 2) crack A6.3.2 Qualification of JQu as Ju—JQu = J u if crack exten-

extension Dap < 0.2 mm + JQ/MsY where M = 2, or an alter- sion Dap $ 0.2 mm (0.008 in.) + JQ/Ms Y.

native value can be determined from the test data, see A9.8.

Note that even if these conditions are met, Jc may be dependent A6.4 Significance of Jc and Ju—Values of JQc that meet the

on thickness (length of crack front). size criteria are labeled Jc and are considered to be insensitive

to the in-plane dimensions of the specimen. Values of JQc that

A6.3 Fracture Instability After Stable Tearing—When do not meet validity remain J Qc and may be size-dependent. Ju

fracture occurs after stable tearing crack extensionDap >0.2 is not considered to be a size-insensitive property and therefore

mm (0.008 in.) + JQ/Ms Y, a single-point fracture toughness is not subject to a size criterion. It is a characteristic of the

value may be obtained, labeled JQu. In addition, part of an material and specimen geometry and size. It signifies that at the

Rcurve may be developed or the final point may be used in the test temperature the material is not completely ductile and can

evaluation of an initiation toughness value JIc (these are sustain only limited R-curve behavior.

A7.1 This annex describes the method for characterizing specimen, if the following two conditions are met: (1) dQc = dc

fracture toughness values based on d, dc,du, or dm, for a fracture if B, bo$ 300 dQc, and (2) crack extension Dap < 0.2 mm

instability and the associated requirements for qualifying the (0.008 in.) + dQu/Md where Md = 1.4 or an alternative value can

data according to this test method. Data meeting all of the be determined from the test data, see A11.3. Data that fail to

qualification requirements of 9.1 and those in this annex result meet the size criterion based on B or bo, but still meet the

in qualified values of dc, du, or dm. Data meeting the size restriction on crack extension, are labeled dc.

requirement result in a value of dc that is insensitive to in-plane

A7.3 Fracture Instability After Stable Tearing—When

dimensions of the specimen.

fracture occurs after stable tearing, crack extension D ap $ 0.2

A7.2 Fracture Instability Before Stable Tearing—When mm (0.008 in.) + 0.7 dQu, a single-point fracture toughness

fracture occurs before stable tearing a single-point toughness value may be obtained, labeled du. In addition, part of an R

value may be obtained labeled dc. curve may be developed or the final point may be used in the

A7.2.1 d is calculated at the final point, instability, using the evaluation of an initiation toughness value (these are described

d formulas from Annex A1-Annex A3. This point is labeled d in Annex A8-Annex A11).

Qc, a provisional dc value. A7.3.1 d is calculated at the final point where instability

A7.2.2 Qualification of dQc as dc—A fracture toughness occurs, using the d formulas for the basic method. These

value that is insensitive to the in-plane dimensions of the formulas must be used for evaluating a single d value no matter

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 23 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

which apparatus was used in the test. This point is labeled dQu, geometry and size. It signifies that at the test temperature the

a provisional du value. material is not completely ductile and can sustain only limited

A7.3.2 Qualification of dQu as du—dQu = du, if crack exten- R-curve behavior.

sion, Dap > 0.2 mm (0.008 in.) + dQu/Md where Md = 1.4 or an

alternative value can be determined from the test data, see A7.4 Maximum Load dm—When no fracture instability

A11.3. occurs up to the first attainment of maximum load, a value of

A7.3.3 Significance of dc and du—Values of dQc that meet dm can be calculated. d is calculated at the first attainment of

the qualification requirements are labeled dc and are considered maximum load plateau using the formulas for the basic

to be insensitive to the in-plane dimensions of the specimen. method. These formulas must be used no matter which

Values of dQc that do not meet the size requirement are dc and apparatus was used. dm may be size-dependent and a function

may be size-dependent. du is not considered to be a size- of test specimen geometry and is not subject to a size criterion.

insensitive property and, therefore, is not subject to a size

It can be useful to define limits on ductile fracture behavior.

criterion. It is a characteristic of the material and specimen

NOTE A8.1—Annex A8-Annex A11 cover methods for evaluating being about 0.005 W. If an initiation value of toughness is

toughness for stable tearing. being evaluated more unload/reload sequences may be neces-

sary in the early region of the J-R curve.

A8.1 This method describes a single-specimen technique

for determining the J-R curve of metallic materials. The J-R

A8.3 Measurement Capacity of Specimen:

curve consists of a plot of J versus crack extension in the

region of J controlled growth. To measure the J-R curve, the A8.3.1 The maximum J-integral capacity for a specimen is

resistance curve procedure of 8.6 must be used. The J-R curve given by the smaller of the following:

is qualified provided that the criteria of 9.1 and A8.3 are Jmax 5 bsY/20, or

satisfied. Jmax 5 BsY/20.

A8.2 J Calculation: A8.3.2 The maximum crack extension capacity for a speci-

A8.2.1 J can be calculated at any point on the load versus men is given by the following:

load-line displacement record using the equations suggested in Da max 5 0.25 bo

the calculation section of Annex A1-Annex A3 for the different

specimen geometries.

A8.2.2 The values of crack length are calculated using the A8.4 Constructing the J-R Curve:

compliance equations described in Annex A1-Annex A3 (or an A8.4.1 The J-integral values and the corresponding crack

alternative method for measuring crack length). The rotation extension values must be plotted as shown in Fig. A8.1. Shift

correction shall be applied to account for geometry changes the J-R curve according to the procedure described in A9.3.

due to deformation for the compact, C(T) and disk-shaped The J-R curve is defined as the data in a region bounded by the

compact DC(T) specimens. coordinate axes and the Jmax and D amax limits given in A8.3.1

A8.2.3 The unload/reload sequences should be spaced with and A8.3.2.

the displacement interval not to exceed 0.01 W, the average

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 24 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- E 1820

A9.1 Significance—The property JIc determined by this A9.3.3.1 Identify all Ji and ai pairs that were determined

method characterizes the toughness of a material near the onset before the specimen reached the maximum load for the test.

of crack extension from a preexisting fatigue crack. The JIc Use this data set of points to calculate a revised aoq from the

value marks the beginning stage of material crack growth following equation:

resistance development, the full extent of which is covered in J

Annex A8. JIc is qualified provided that the criteria of 9.1 and a 5 a oq 1 2s 1 BJ2 1 CJ3 (A9.1)

Y

A9.8 and A9.9 are satisfied.

The coefficients of this equation shall be found using a least

A9.2 J Calculation—Calculations of the J integral are squares fit procedure. An example BASIC code (see Fig. X1.1)

made using the equations in Annex A1-Annex A3. to accomplish this fit is presented in Appendix X1.

A9.3.3.2 If the number of points used in A9.3.3.1 to

A9.3 Corrections and Adjustments to Data:

determine aoq is less than 8 or of these 8 there are less than 3

A9.3.1 A correction is applied to the estimated Dai data between 0.4 JQ and JQ or the correlation coefficient of this fit

values to obtain an improved aoq. This correction is intended to is less than 0.96, the data set is not adequate to evaluate any

obtain the best value of aoq, based on the initial set of crack toughness measures in accordance with this test method.

length estimates, ai, data. For data generated using the basic

procedure of 8.4, no adjustments to the data are necessary. To A9.4 If the optically measured crack length, ao, differs from

evaluate JIc using data from the basic procedure, proceed to aoq by more than 0.01W, the data set is not adequate according

A9.6. to this test method.

A9.3.2 A modified construction line slope, M, can be A9.5 Evaluate the final Ji values using the adjusted aoq of

calculated from a fit to the initial Ji and ai data, and used for the A9.3.3 and the equations of the applicable Annex A1, Annex

calculation of JIc. A2, or Annex A3.

A9.3.3 Adjustment of aoq—The value of JQ is very depen-

dent on the aoq used to calculate the Dai quantities. The value A9.6 Calculation of an Interim JQ:

obtained for aoq in 8.6.3.1 might not be the correct value and A9.6.1 Basic Procedure—for each specimen, calculate Da

the following adjustment procedure is required. as follows:

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 25 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

Da 5 ap 2 ao (A9.2)

Resistance Curve Procedure—for each ai value, calculate a

corresponding Dai as follows:

Dai 5 ai 2 a0q (A9.3)

Plot J versus Da as shown in Fig. A9.1. Determine a

A9.6.6 The intersection of the regression line of A9.6.5 with

the 0.2-mm offset line defines JQ and DaQ. To determine this

intersection the following procedure is recommended.

A9.6.6.1 As a starting point estimate an interim JQ(1) = JQ(i)

value from the data plot of Fig. A9.1.

FIG. A9.1 Definition of Construction Lines for Data Qualification A9.6.6.2 Evaluate Da(i) from the following:

JQ~i!

construction line in accordance with the following equation: Da ~i! 5 Ms 1 0.2 mm ~0.008 in.! (A9.6)

Y

J 5 MsYDa (A9.4)

A9.6.6.3 Evaluate an interim JQ(i+1) from the following

where M = 2 or M can be determined from the test data. In power law relationship:

S D

some cases the initial slope of the J-R curve is steeper than 2sY,

Da~i! C2

for example with austenitic stainless steels. For these materials, JQ~i 1 1! 5 C1 (A9.7)

it is recommended that a JQ value be determined using M = 2 k

such that an experimental M can then be evaluated and verified where k = 1.0 mm or 0.0394 in.

according to A9.7. An improved JQ can then be evaluated. A9.6.6.4 Increment i and return to A9.6.6.2 and A9.6.6.3 to

Under no circumstances can a value of M less than 2 be used get Da(i) and interim JQ(i+1) until the interim JQ values

for JQ evaluation. converge to within 62 %.

A9.6.2 Plot the construction line, then draw an exclusion A9.6.6.5 Project the intercepts of the power law curve with

line parallel to the construction line intersecting the abscissa at the 0.15-mm (0.006-in.) and the 1.5-mm (0.06-in.) exclusion

0.15 mm (0.006 in.). Draw a second exclusion line parallel to lines vertically down to the abscissa. This indicates Damin and

the construction line intersecting the abscissa at 1.5 mm (0.06 Dalimit, respectively. Eliminate all data points that do not fall

in.). Plot all J − Da data points that fall inside the area enclosed between Damin and Dalimit as shown in Fig. A9.1. Also elimi-

by these two parallel lines and capped by Jlimit = bos Y/15. nate all data points which lie above the limiting J capacity

A9.6.3 Plot a line parallel to the construction and exclusion where Jlimit = bosY/15. The region of qualified data is shown in

lines at an offset value of 0.2 mm (0.008 in.). Fig. A9.2.

A9.6.4 At least one J–Da point shall lie between the A9.6.6.6 At least five data points must remain between

0.15-mm (0.006-in.) exclusion line and a parallel line with an Damin and Dalimit and Jlimit. Data point spacing must meet the

offset of 0.5 mm (0.02 in.) from the construction line as shown requirements of A9.6.4. If these data points are different from

in Fig. A9.2. At least one J−Da point shall lie between this those used in A9.6.6 to evaluate JQ, obtain a new value of JQ

0.5-mm offset line and the 1.5-mm (0.06-in.) exclusion line. based only on qualified data.

Acceptable data are shown in Fig. A9.2. The other J−Da pairs

A9.7 An alternative construction line slope, M, can be

can be anywhere inside the exclusion zone.

calculated by fitting the least squares linear regression line to

A9.6.5 Using the method of least squares, determine a linear

the initial J-R curve data for data in the region 0.2 JQ# Ji #

regression line of the following form:

0.6JQ as evaluated with M = 2. A minimum of 6 data points are

lnJ 5 lnC1 1 C 2 ln S DDa

k (A9.5) required in the evaluation region to allow an experimental

value of M. Only values of M $2 are allowed by this method.

where k = 1.0 mm or 0.0394 in. Use only the data which A revised JQ can now be evaluated using this M by returning to

conform to the requirements stated in the previous sections. A9.6.1-A9.6.6.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 26 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

A9.8 Qualification of Data—The data shall satisfy the A9.8.2.3 If an experimental value of M is determined, at

requirements of 9.1 and all of the following requirements to be least 6 data points are required in the region 0.2JQ #Ji# 0.6JQ.

qualified according to this test method. If the data do not pass Only M # 2.0 can be used in the method.

these requirements no fracture toughness values can be deter-

mined according to this test method. A9.9 Qualification of JQ as JIc—JQ = JIc , a size-

A9.8.1 The power coefficient C 2 of A9.6.5 shall be less than independent value of fracture toughness, if:

1.0. A9.9.1 Thickness B > 25 JQ/sY,

A9.8.2 For the Resistance Curve Procedure the following

additional requirements must be satisified: A9.9.2 Initial ligament, bo > 25 JQ/sY,

A9.8.2.1 aoq shall not differ from ao by more than 0.01W. A9.9.3 Regression Line Slope—The slope of the power law

A9.8.2.2 The number of data available to calculate aoq shall regression line, dJ/da, evaluated at DaQ is less than sY.

be $8; the number of data between 0.4JQ and JQ shall be $3;

and the correlation coefficient of the least squares fit of A9.10 Evaluation of KJIc—Calculate KJIc= =(E8JIc) using

A9.3.3.1 shall be greater than 0.96. E8 = E/(1-n2) and the qualified JIc of A9.9.

for determining the d-R curve of metallic materials. The d-R

curve consists of a plot of d versus crack extension. To measure

the d-R curve the resistance curve procedure of 8.6 must be A10.4 Constructing the d-R Curve:

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

used. The d-R curve is qualified provided that the criteria of 9.1 A10.4.1 The d values and the corresponding crack exten-

and A10.3 are satisfied. sion values must be plotted as shown in Fig. A10.1. A d- R

A10.2 d Calculation: curve is established by smoothly fitting the data points in the

region bounded by the coordinate axes and the dmax and Damax

A10.2.1 The d calculation can be evaluated at any point

limits.

along the load versus load-line displacement record using the

equations suggested in the calculation section of Annex A1-

Annex A3 for the different specimen geometries.

A10.2.2 The values of crack length are calculated using the

compliance equations described in Annex A1-Annex A3. The

rotation correction shall be applied to account for geometry

changes due to deformation for the compact, C(T) and disk-

shaped compact DC(T) specimens.

A10.2.3 The unload/reload sequences should be spaced

with the displacement interval less than 0.01 W, the average

being about 0.005 W. If an initiation value of toughness is

being evaluated more unload/reload sequences may be neces-

sary in the early region of the d-R Curve.

A10.3 Measurement Capacity of a Specimen:

A10.3.1 The maximum d capacity for a specimen is given as

follows:

d max 5 bo/20

specimen is given as follows: FIG. A10.1 Typical d-R Curve

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 27 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

by this method characterizes the fracture toughness of materi-

als near the onset of stable crack extension from a preexisting

fatigue crack. dIc is qualified provided that the criteria of 9.1

and A11.8 and A11.9 are satisfied.

A11.2 d Calculation—Calculations of d are made using the

equations in Annex A1-Annex A3.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

A11.3 Corrections and Adjustments to Data:

A11.3.1 A correction is applied to the estimated ai data

values to obtain an improved aoq. This correction is intended to

obtain the best value of aoq, based on the initial set of crack

length estimates, ai, data. For data generated using the basic

procedure of 8.4, no adjustments to the data are necessary. To

evaluate dIc using data from the basic procedure, proceed to

A11.7.

A11.3.2 A modified construction line slope, Md, can be

calculated from a fit to the initial di and ai data, and used for the

calculation of dIc. FIG. A11.1 Definition of Construction Lines for Data Qualification

A11.3.3 Adjustment of aoq—The value of dQ is very depen-

dent on the aoq used to calculate the Dai quantities. The value

d 5 Md Da (A11.4)

obtained for aoq in 8.6.3.1 might not be the correct value, and

the following adjustment procedure is required. where Md = 1.4 or Md can be determined from the test data.

A11.3.3.1 Identify all di and ai pairs that were determined In some cases the initial slope of the d-R curve is steeper than

before the specimen reached the maximum load for the test. 1.4. For these materials it is recommended that a dQ value be

Use this data set of points to calculate a revised aoq from the determined using M d = 1.4 such that an experimental Md can

following equation: then be evaluated and verified according to A11.7. An im-

d

proved dQ can then be evaluated. Under no circumstances can

a 5 aoq 1 1.4 1 Bd2 1 Cd 3 (A11.1) a value of Md less than 1.4 be used for dQ evaluation.

A11.6.2 Plot the construction line on suitable graph paper.

The coefficients of this equation shall be found using a least Draw an exclusion line parallel to the construction line

squares fit procedure. Example BASIC code (see Fig. X1.1) to intersecting the abscissa at 0.15 mm (0.006 in.) as shown in

accomplish this fit is presented in Appendix X1. Fig. A11.1. Draw a second exclusion line intersecting the

A11.3.3.2 If the number of points used in A11.3.3.1 to abscissa at 1.5-mm (0.06-in.). Plot all d-Dap data points that

calculate aoq is less than 8, or of these 8 there are less than 3 fall inside the area enclosed by these two parallel lines and

between 0.4dQ and dQ, or the correlation coefficient of this fit capped by dlimit = bo/15.

is <0.96, the data set is not adequate to evaluate any toughness A11.6.3 One d-Dap point must lie between the 0.15-mm

measures in accordance with this method. (0.006-in.) exclusion line and a parallel line with an offset of

A11.4 If the optically measured crack length, ao, differs 0.5 mm (0.02 in.) from the construction line. One d-Dap point

from aoq by more than 0.01 W, the data set is not adequate in must lie between a line parallel to the construction line at an

accordance with this method. offset of 0.5 mm (0.020 in.) and the 1.5-mm exclusion line.

Acceptable data is shown in Fig. A11.2 with one point in Zone

A11.5 Evaluate the final di values using the adjusted aoq of A and one point in Zone B. The other d-Dap pairs can be placed

A11.3.3.1 and the equations of the applicable Annex A1, anywhere inside the exclusion zone.

Annex A2, or Annex A3. A11.6.4 Plot a line parallel to the construction line and

A11.6 Calculation of an Interim dQ: exclusion lines at an offset value of 0.2 mm (0.008 in.).

A11.6.1 Basic Procedure—for each specimen, calculate Da A11.6.5 To establish a crack initiation measurement point

as follows: under dominant slow-stable crack growth, a power law curve

fitting procedure shall be used. This has the following form:

Da 5 ap 2 ao

S D

(A11.2)

Da C2

Resistance Curve Procedure—for each ai value, calculate a d Q 5 C1 k (A11.5)

corresponding Dai as follows:

where k = 1 mm (or 0.0394 in.) depending upon units used.

Dai 5 ai 2 a0q (A11.3) This power law can be determined by using a method of least

Plot d versus Da as shown in Fig. A11.1. Draw a construction squares to determine a linear regression line of the following

line in accordance with the following equation: form:

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 28 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- E 1820

Dalimit, respectively. Eliminate all data points that do not fall

between D amin and Dalimit as shown in Fig. A11.1. Also

eliminate all data points which lie above the limiting d capacity

where dlimit = bo/15. The region of qualified data is shown in

Fig. A11.2.

A11.6.6.6 At least five data points must remain between

Damin and Dalimit and dlimit. Data point spacing must meet the

requirements of A11.6.3. If these data points are different from

those used in A11.6.6 to evaluate d Q, obtain a new value of dQ

based only on qualified data.

calculated by fitting the least squares linear regression line to

the initial J-R curve data for data in the region 0.2dQ # di #

0.6dQ as evaluated with Md = 1.4. A minimum of 6 data points

are required in the evaluation region to allow an experimental

value of Md. Only values of M d$ 1.4 are allowed by this

method. A revised dQ can now be evaluated using this Md by

FIG. A11.2 Definition of Regions for Data Qualification returning to A11.6.1-A11.6.6.

lnd 5 lnC1 1 C 2 ln S D

Da

k (A11.6)

A11.8 Qualification of Data—The data shall satisfy the

requirements of 9.1 and all of the following requirements to be

Use only the data that conform to the criteria stated in the qualified according to this method. If the data do not pass these

previous sections. Plot the regression line as illustrated in Fig. requirements, no fracture toughness values can be determined

A11.1. according to this method.

A11.6.6 The intersection of the regression line of A11.6.4 A11.8.1 The power coefficient C2 of A11.6.5 shall be less

with the offset line of A11.6.5 defines dQ and DaQ. To than 1.0.

determine this intersection the following procedure is recom- A11.8.2 For the Resistance Curve Procedure the following

mended: additional requirements must be satisified:

A11.6.6.1 Estimate a dQ (1) value from the data plot of Fig. A11.8.2.1 aoq shall not differ from ao by more than 0.01 W.

A11.1. A11.8.2.2 The number of data available to calculate aoq

A11.6.6.2 Evaluate Dap (1) from the following: shall be $8; the number of data between 0.4dQ and dQ shall be

dQ~1! $3; and the correlation coefficient of the least squares fit of

Da p~1! 5 M 1 0.2 mm ~0.008 in.! (A11.7) A11.6.5 shall be greater than 0.96.

d

A11.8.2.3 If an experimental value of Md is determined, at

A11.6.6.3 Evaluate

least 6 data points are required in the region 0.2dQ # di#

dQ~1! 5 C1 S D

Dap~1!

k

C2

(A11.8)

0.6dQ. Only Md # 1.4 can be used by this method.

A11.6.6.4 Return to A11.6.6.2 and A11.6.6.3 to get Da(i) and A11.9 Qualification of dQ as dIc—

dQ(i + 1) until the dQ values converge to within 2 %. d Q = dIc, a size-independent value of fracture toughness, if:

A11.6.6.5 Project the intercepts of the power law curve with A11.9.1 The initial ligament, b o $ 35dQ.

the 0.15-mm (0.006-in.) and the 1.5-mm (0.06-in.) exclusion A11.9.2 The slope of the power law regression line, dd/da,

lines vertically down to the abscissa. This indicates Damin and evaluated at DaQ must be less than 1.

mation.

j

SD

f~a/W! 5 z @C0 1 C1~a/W!

1 C 2~a/W! 2 1 C3~a/W! 3 1 C 4~a/W! 4#

A12.1 Stress-Intensity Factor:

A12.1.1 The elastic stress intensity factor for a specimen is A12.1.2 The parameters for f(a/W) are listed in Table A12.1.

expressed as follows:

A12.2 Compliance from Crack Length:

Pf~a/W!

K5 (A12.1)

~BBNW!1/2 A12.2.1 Compliance, C , of a specimen is expressed as a

where: function of crack length as follows:

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 29 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

TABLE A12.1 Parameters for Stress-Intensity Factors A12.2.2 Be = B − (B − BN) 2/B and E8 = E/(1 − v 2) for all

Specimens cases and the other parameters for compliance are listed in

SE(B) C(T) DC(T) Table A12.2.

j 3(S/W) (a/W) 1/2

2 + a /W 2 + a /W

z 2(1 + 2a/W) (1 − (1 − a/W)3/2 (1 − a/W)3/2

a/W)3/2

C0 1.99 0.886 0.76

C1 −2.15 4.64 4.8

C2 6.08 −13.32 −11.58

C3 −6.63 14.72 11.43

C4 2.7 −5.6 −4.08

Limits 0 # a /W # 1 0.2 # a/W# 1 0.2 # a/W # 1

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

S/ W = 4 H/W = 0.6 D/W = 1.35

Refs (10) (10), (11) (12)

Specimen SE(B) C(T) DC(T)

Location vLL vLL vLL

Y S ~W 1 a! ~W 1 a!

~W 2 a! ~W 2 a! ~W 2 a!

A0 1.193 2.163 2.0462

A1 −1.980 12.219 9.6496

A2 4.478 −20.065 −13.7346

A3 −4.433 −0.9925 6.1748

A4 1.739 20.609 0

A5 0 −9.9314 0

Limits 0 # a /W # 1 0.2 # a/W# 0.2 # a/W #

0.975 0.8

Refs (13) (14) (15)

v

C5P

Y2

5 B E8 @A0 1 A 1~a/W!

e

1 A2~a/W!2 1 A 3~a/W!3 1 A4~a/W!4 1 A 5~a/W!5# (A12.2)

A13.1 This annex describes the determination of plane- the rapid load test. The yield strength of the material must be

strain fracture toughness (K Ic) properties of metallic materials determined or estimated for the loading time of the fracture test

under conditions where the loading rates exceed those for and is used in the analysis of the fracture test data. All of the

conventional (static) testing [150 000 psi·in.1/2/min (2.75 criteria for static KIcdetermination apply to the rapid-load

MPa·m1/2/s)]. plane-strain fracture toughness test. The toughness property is

denoted by KIc( ) where the time to reach the load correspond-

A13.2 Summary of Requirements—Special requirements ing to KQ in milliseconds is indicated in the parentheses ( ).

are necessary for plane-strain fracture toughness testing at

loading rates exceeding those of conventional (static) plane- A13.3 Significance and Use—The significance of the

conventional (static) KIc properties applies also to the case of

strain fracture toughness testing. This description of these

rapid loading. The plane-strain fracture toughness of certain

requirements does not include impact or quasi-impact testing

materials is sensitive to the loading rate and substantial

(free-falling or swinging masses). Conventional fracture tough-

decreases in toughness may be noted as the loading rate

ness test specimens are prepared as described in this method,

increases. Generally, such materials also show a pronounced

tested under rapid-load conditions, and a fracture toughness

dependence of KIc on test temperature. For example, the

value is calculated. Load-deflection, load-time, and deflection-

loading rate sensitivity of structural grade steels has required

time curves are recorded for each test. The load-deflection

the development of a lower bound KIR curve, given in

curves resulting from these tests are analyzed to ensure that the

Appendix G of Division III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure

initial linear portion of the load-displacement record is suffi-

Vessel Code,5 for the fracture-safe design of heavy-wall

ciently well-defined that PQcan be determined unambiguously.

In addition, a test time (t), restricted to not less than one

millisecond is determined. This test time and an optionally 5

Available from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 345 E. 47th

calculated average stress intensity factor rate, K̇, characterize Street, New York, NY 10017.

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 30 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

nuclear pressure vessels. Additionally, KIc values for steels A13.5 Procedure:

tested at various temperatures and loading rates are required for A13.5.1 Loading Rate— The rate of loading is optional with

correlation with small-scale production control tests (such as the investigator, but the time to reach the load corresponding to

the Charpy V-notch test) for setting material specifications and KQ shall not be less than 1 ms. Use a preload to eliminate

fracture-safe design procedures. ringing in the load or displacement transducers associated with

A13.4 Apparatus: clearances in the load train being suddenly taken up by the start

A13.4.1 Loading—Generally, hydraulic machines with of rapid loading.

rapid-acting servo controlled valves are used. Depending on A13.5.2 For each test conducted, a load versus time, a

the compliance of the loading system and the pump capacity, displacement versus time, and a load versus displacement

an accumulator may be required. record shall be obtained. The time scale of these records shall

A13.4.2 Fixtures—The fixtures used for static plane-strain be accurately determined since the time is used to characterize

fracture toughness tests are generally suitable for rapid-load the test. Examine the time-dependent records for the presence

tests. However, consideration should be given to the possibility of ringing before reaching the P Q load. Such ringing can result

that the toughness of the fixture material may be reduced by from inertial effects as described in Note A13.2. The special

rapid loading. record analysis procedure described in A13.6 may be helpful in

A13.4.3 Load and Displacement Transducers—The trans- assessing the magnitude of such effects.

ducers used for static plane-strain fracture toughness tests are NOTE A13.2—It should be recognized that some materials may exhibit

generally suitable for rapid-load tests. However, these trans- a burst of crack extension at loads less than PQ that is sufficiently abrupt

ducers must have response characteristics that will ensure that to produce ringing in the displacement transducer signal. Such an abrupt

inertial effects will not influence the load and displacement advance of the crack may be associated with material inhomogeneities

local to the fatigue crack tip. If the ringing is severe it may not be possible

signals. to unambiguously determine a value for PQ. The presence of such bursts

NOTE A13.1—While not required, the resonant frequencies of these of crack extension should be recorded for those tests having analyzable

transducers may be determined by suitably exciting them and observing load versus displacement records.

the wave characteristic on an oscilloscope. If ringing (high-frequency NOTE A13.3—The test data may be directly recorded if the recording

oscillation) is observed within the time period required to reach the PQ devices have sufficient frequency response. Generally, it is advantageous

load, the stiffness of the transducers should be increased or their mass to use a storage device that will capture the data and permit playing it out

reduced. Load cells are quite stiff and should provide no problem at the at a sufficiently slow speed that a pen recorder can be used in producing

minimum loading time of 1 ms. The displacement transducer might be the required records. Such storage devices are commonly available in the

cause for concern depending on its design. The cantilever beam displace- form of digital storage oscilloscopes having pen recorder outputs. Sepa-

ment gage described in Section 6 has been used successfully at loading rate storage instruments are also available. In general these digital storage

times slightly lower than 1 ms. The resonant frequency of this gage when devices have performance characteristics that are more than adequate to

mounted in a specimen in a conventional manner and excited by tapping capture, store, and replay the transducer signals from a 1-ms test. For

is about 3300 Hz. The free-arm resonant frequency is about 750 Hz. Other example, calculations show that for a typical fracture test, the crack-mouth

gages of the same type but having different dimensions should operate displacement resolution would be about 0.76 mm/sample (0.030 mil/

satisfactorily if their free-arm resonance is at least 750 Hz. The following sample) and the load resolution would be about 712 N/sample (160

equation may be used to estimate the free-arm resonant frequency of such lbf/sample). It should be possible to obtain at least 1000 simultaneous

a gage: samples of load and displacement during such a test. A digital storage

F G

scope capable of at least this performance would have the following

B2Eg characteristics: maximum digitizing rate of 1 MHz, maximum sensitivity

f 5 RC (A13.1)

rl4 of 6100 mV, resolution of 0.025 %, and memory of 4096 words by 12

bits. It may be necessary to amplify the output of the clip gage moderately

where: and possibly that of the load cell depending on its capacity in terms of the

RC = 51.7, range required. These values of resolution are based on a total noise figure

f = resonant frequency, Hz, of about 50 mV.

B = arm thickness, m,

E = elastic modulus of the arms, MPa, A13.6 Calculation and Interpretation of Results:

g = gravitational acceleration, 9.804 m/s2, A13.6.1 Special requirements are placed on the analysis of

r = density of the arm material, kg/m3, and the load versus displacement record. These take into account

l = length of the uniform thickness section of the arms, the fact that experience (17) has shown load versus displace-

m. ment records from rapid-load fracture toughness tests are not

The coefficient RC becomes 0.162 if inch-pound units are always as smooth in the linear range as those obtained from

used where B is in inches, E is in pound-force per square inch, static tests. The special requirements of this annex are designed

g is 386 in./s2, r is pounds per cubic inch, and 1 is in inches. to ensure that an unambiguous value of PQ can be determined.

A13.4.4 Signal Conditioners—Amplification or filtering of The test time must be determined from the load versus time

the transducer signals may be necessary. Such signal condi- record.

tioning units should have a frequency response from dc to at A13.6.2 The additional analysis of the load versus displace-

least 20/t (kilohertz) where t is the test time in milliseconds as ment record is illustrated in Fig. A13.1. The procedure is as

defined in A13.6.3. As described in A13.4.3, conventional follows: Construct the straight line OA best representing the

mechanical recording devices may not have sufficient fre- initial portion of the test record that ideally should be linear but

quency response to permit direct plotting of the load versus may not be smooth. Then construct the line OP5 as described

time and the displacement versus time signals. in Annex A5 and determine PQ. Draw a vertical line at vp

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 31 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

FIG. A13.2 Determination of Test Time from Load Versus Time

Record

Displacement Records (5 % Secant Line Not Shown) at or above that of the rapid-load test, no further yield strength

considerations are necessary.

passing through PQ and define Pv at the point of intersection of A13.6.5 If the test is invalid using such a yield strength, a

this line with the line OA. Determine 5 % of Pv and construct tension test should be conducted on the test material at the

two lines BC and DE parallel to OA with BC passing through temperature and loading time of the rapid-load toughness test

Pv + 0.05 P v and DE passing through PQ (Pv − 0.05Pv). Draw with the time to reach the yield load in the tension test

a horizontal line at P = 0.5 PQ. For the test to be valid that approximately equal to the time t defined in A13.6.3.

recorded load versus displacement curve up to PQ must lie A13.6.6 In the absence of s YS values as defined in A13.6.5,

within the envelope described by these parallel lines for the the dynamic yield strength sYD of certain steels may be

portion of the record with P # 0.5 PQ. estimated using the following equation:

A13.6.3 The test time t in milliseconds is determined from A

the record of load versus time as indicated in Fig. A13.2. sYD 5 sYD 1 2B (A13.2)

Tx log10~2 3 10 7t!

Construct the best straight line OA through the most linear

portion of the record. The value t is then determined from the where:

point of intersection of this line with the time axis to the time sYS = 0.2 % offset room temperature static yield strength,

corresponding to PQ. This time, t is shown in the parentheses t = loading time, ms, and

( ) following KIc. An average stress intensity rate, K̇, may be Tx = temperature of the rapid-load toughness test.

calculated by dividing KQ or KIc by t with the result being Units:

expressed in ksi·in.1/2/s or MPa·m1/2/s. It should be recognized If sYS is in megapascals, then A = 1 198 860, B = 187.4 MPa,

that minor errors in determining the loading time are not If s YS is in pound force per square inch, then

significant because significant changes in the toughness require A = 174 000, B = 27.2 ksi,

a change of several orders of magnitude in loading rate. If the test temperature T is measured in K, then Tx = 1.8 T, and

A13.6.4 The 0.2 % offset tensile yield strength sYS is used If the test temperature T is measured in °F, then Tx = (T + 460).

in determining the specimen size requirements for a valid test NOTE A13.4—The equation in A13.6.6 has been found useful only in

as described in Annex A5. If the rapid load value of KQ is valid estimating the low-temperature dynamic yield strength of constructional

using a static yield strength value determined at a temperature steels having room temperature yield strengths below 480 MPa (70 ksi).

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 32 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

A14.1.1 This annex covers the determination of the rate loading rate such that the time taken to reach Pf (see 7.4.4) is

dependent JIc(t) and the J-integral versus crack growth resis- less than 0.1 minutes.

tance curve (J-R(t) curve) for metallic materials under condi- A14.3.1.4 Minimum test time-tw(t)—In J integral fracture

tions where the loading rate exceeds that allowed for conven- testing, the minimum time to the rate dependent JQ(t) or JQc(t)

tional (static) testing, see Section 8.4.2. accepted by this method (18). Test times less than tw will lead

to inaccurate J integral results since large kinetic energy

A14.2 Summary of Requirements components will be present. In this method:

A14.2.1 Special requirements are necessary for J-integral 2p

tw 5 (A14.1)

fracture toughness testing of metallic materials at loading rates =ks/Meff

exceeding those of conventional (static) testing. Standard

fracture toughness test specimens are prepared as described in where:

this method, tested under rapid-load or drop weight conditions, ks = specimen load line stiffness, (N/m),

and a J-R(t) curve is calculated. From this J-R(t) curve a JQ(t) Meff = effective mass of the specimen, taken here to be half

can be evaluated using Section 9 of this method. If unstable of the specimen mass (kg).

fracture intervenes, a JQc(t) can be evaluated at the onset of A14.3.1.5 Test time - tQ(t)(T)—In J integral fracture testing,

unstable behavior as in the static case. the observed time to the rate dependent JQ(t).

A14.2.1.1 Load, load line displacement, and time are re- A14.3.1.6 Jc(t)(FL−1)—In J integral fracture testing, the

corded for each test. The load versus displacement curve rate dependent J integral at the onset of fracture instability

resulting from each test is analyzed to ensure that the initial prior to the onset of significant stable tearing crack extension,

portion of the curve is sufficiently well defined that an see Section 3.2.10, as defined in this annex.

unambiguous curve can be determined from the J(t) versus A14.3.1.7 JQc(t)(FL−1)—In J integral fracture testing, the

crack length (a(t)) data. In addition a minimum test time is provisional rate dependent J integral at the onset of fracture

calculated from the specimen stiffness and effective mass that instability prior to the onset of significant stable tearing crack

sets a maximum allowed test rate for the material and geometry extension, as defined in this annex.

being tested. At times less than the minimum test time a A14.3.1.8 Ju(t)(FL−1)—In J integral testing, the rate depen-

significant kinetic energy component is present in the specimen dent J integral at the onset of fracture instability after signifi-

relative to the internal energy, and the static J integral cant stable tearing crack extension, see Section 3.2.11, as

equations presented in this method are not accurate. Evaluation defined in this annex.

of a JQ(t) or JQc(t) at a time less than the minimum test time is A14.3.1.9 JIc(t)(FL−1)—In J integral testing, the rate depen-

not allowed by this method. dent J integral at the onset of stable crack extension as defined

A14.2.1.2 Evaluation of the J-R(t) curve requires estimation in this annex.

of crack extension as a function of load line displacement or A14.3.1.10 JQ(t)(FL−1)—In J integral fracture toughness

time using the normalization method of Annex A15. An elastic testing, the provisional, rate dependent, J integral at the onset

compliance method cannot be used. A multiple specimen of stable crack extension as defined in this annex.

method can be used to evaluate JQ(t) from a series of tests, but A14.3.1.11 dJ/dt(FL−1T−1)—In J integral fracture testing,

the resulting J-R(t) curve is not valid according to this method. the rate of change of the J integral per unit time. Two loading

A14.2.1.3 All of the criteria for the static JIc, Jc, and J-R rate quantities are defined in this method, (dJ/dt)I measured

curve evaluations apply to the rapid load J integral fracture before JQ(t), and (dJ/dt)T measured after JQ(t), as defined by

toughness test. The rapid load J integral resistance curve is this annex.

denoted J-R(t), the stable initiation property JIc(t), and the A14.4 Significance and Use

unstable initiation property by Jc(t), where the time to reach the

A14.4.1 The significance of the static J-R curve, JIc, and Jc

instant corresponding to JQ in milliseconds is indicated in the

properties applies also to the case of rapid loading. The J

brackets.

integral fracture toughness of certain metallic materials is

A14.3. Terminology sensitive to the loading rate and to the temperature of test. The

J-R(t) curve and JIc(t) properties are usually elevated by higher

A14.3.1 Definitions:

test rates while Jc(t) can be dramatically lowered by higher test

A14.3.1.1 The definitions given in Terminology E 1823 are

rates.

applicable to this annex.

A14.3.1.2 The definitions given in Section 3 of this method A14.5 Apparatus

are applicable.

A14.5.1 Loading—Two types of high rate loading systems

are anticipated. Servohydraulic machines with high flow rate

6

This test method is an Annex to ASTM E1820. It under the jurisdiction of

servovalves and high capacity accumulators, or alternatively,

ASTM Committee E08 on Fatigue and Fracture and is the direct responsibility of drop weight impact machines can be used. On-specimen load

Subcommittee E08.08 on Elastic-Plastic and Fracture Mechanics Technology. measurements are recommended for high rate tests. Remote

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 33 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

load cells or other transducers can be used for high rate tests if growth for J-R(t) curve development. Soft metal absorbers are

the requirements of this annex are met. Strain gage bridges are recommended to reduce the initial shock resulting from the

recommended for on-specimen load measurement, as shown in impact of the drop tower striker on the specimen surface. A

Fig. A14.1 and Fig. A14.2. For each specimen type, four gages high frequency load line displacement transducer and signal

are connected to construct a four-arm bridge and calibrated conditioner is required for drop tower tests.

statically before the rapid load test (see A14.5.4). Strain gages A14.5.4 Load Transducers—If remote load transducers are

with grid patterns of approximately 0.25 B are recommended. used, they shall meet the requirements of Practice E 4. Re-

For SE(B) specimens, gages should be positioned on the quirements on the measured initial specimen stiffness and on

specimen mid-plane at the specimen span quarterpoints. For the load and displacement signal smoothness are presented in

C(T) specimens, the gages should be positioned on the speci- A14.7.4. Static calibration of the on-specimen strain gage

men upper and lower surfaces near the specimen mid-plane bridge should be done over a load range from 20 to 100 % of

with the gage edge at least 0.1W behind the initial crack, ao. the final precracking load. At least five load calibration values

A14.5.2 Servohydraulic Testing Fixtures—The fixtures used shall be used, spaced evenly over this interval, and at least two

for static fracture toughness tests generally require some repeat data sets are required. The applied load shall exceed 1⁄4

modification for rapid load tests. Slack grip fixtures are often of the calibrated range of the reference load cell used. The

necessary to reduce the applied load oscillation and to allow on-specimen, transmitted load measuring system shall be

the actuator to accelerate before load is applied to the speci- accurate to within 2 % of the final precracking load over the

men. Soft metal absorbers are generally used in drop tower calibration range.

tests to reduce the inertial shock caused by the impact of the A14.5.5 Displacement Transducers—The transducer shall

test machine striker on the specimen surface. have response characteristics that allow it to follow the motion

Both initial and final crack lengths are required by the of the specimen while not introducing excessive mechanical

normalization method of J-R(t) curve development of Annex noise into the measured displacement.

A15. The high rate test must be stopped abruptly to obtain a A14.5.5.1 Cantilever beam displacement gages such as

limited specimen deformation and a crack extension increment those used in static fracture toughness testing may be suitable

satisfying the requirement of A15.1.2.1. Rigid stop block for rapid-load testing, see A13.4.3. The cantilever beam dis-

fixtures can be used to obtain the abrupt stop. In some cases a placement gage described in Annex A1 of Test Method E 399

ramp and hold or square wave command signal can be used to has been used successfully at loading times (tQ) slightly less

obtain limited specimen deformation for the specimen test. than 1 ms.

A14.5.3 Drop Tower Testing Fixtures—Special fixtures are A14.5.5.2 Gap measuring transducers that use either capaci-

necessary for drop tower testing according to this standard. tance or optical means to measure displacement have also been

Recommended fixtures for SE(B) and C(T) specimens are used successfully in rapid-load testing (19). These transducers

shown in Figs. A14.3 and A14.4 respectively (19). Stop block have the advantage that they can be rigidly attached to the

fixtures are required to obtain a limited extent of stable crack specimen, and the vibration characteristics of the transducer

FIG. A14.1 Strain Gages Mounted on SE(B) Specimen for Measurement of Transmitted Load

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 34 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

FIG. A14.2 Strain Gages Mounted on C(T) Specimen for Measurement of Transmitted Load

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

generally do not affect the measured displacement. The disad- component in frequency response of the displacement mea-

vantages are that the output may be non-linear, and the signal surement system. Capacitive transducers have been designed to

conditioners used with these transducers are often the limiting fit in the notch of the C(T) specimen as shown in Fig. A14.5.

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 35 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

FIG. A14.4 Test Fixtures for Drop Tower C(T) Specimens

Fiber-optic transducers have been used to measure load line acquisitions systems. The rate at which an analog signal is

displacement of SE(B) specimens. If the load line displacement sampled to create a digital signal shall be high enough to

is measured relative to the test fixture, care must be taken to ensure that the peak value is accurately captured. The rate of

account for the effects of fixture compliance and brinnelling on data acquisition shall result in the time per data set being less

the measured displacement, as discussed in 8.3.1.1. than tQ/50.

A14.5.6 Signal Conditioners—The user is referred to Guide

E 1942 for a detailed discussion of requirements for data A14.6 Procedure

acquisitions systems. The signal conditioner must have suffi-

A14.6.1 Follow the procedure of Sections 7 and 8 to prepare

cient bandwidth to capture the transducer signal without

and test specimens. The following items are additional steps

introducing distortion.

necessary for high rate testing.

A14.5.6.1 Signal conditioners shall have a frequency band-

width in excess of 10/tQ for the load signal and 2/tQ for the A14.6.2 Calculate tw, the minimum test time from Eq

displacement signal(s). The more stringent requirement on the A14.1. The loading rate is optional but the time to reach JQ(t)

load signal is necessary to obtain an accurate measurement of or JQc(t) shall not be less than tw.

the elastic component of the J integral near crack initiation. No A14.6.3 For each test, load and load line displacement are

“phase shifting” of transducer signals is allowed by this required as functions of time. Additional crack opening dis-

method. The bandwidth required to accurately capture a signal placement data, electric potential data, or both, can be acquired

of that frequency will depend on the type of low-pass filter in as well if desired.

the signal conditioner, and the tolerable error. If a low-pass A14.6.4 Install and align the specimen in the test fixtures,

filter is present in the measurement system it should not establish the test temperature, conduct the test at the desired

introduce more than 0.5 % measurement error, see Guide test rate, collect and store the data required. Remove the test

E 1942. specimen from the fixture and mark the extent of the ductile

A14.5.7 Data Sampling—The user is referred to Guide crack growth according to 8.5.3, break the specimen open

E 1942 for a detailed discussion of requirements for data according to 8.5.4 to expose the fracture surface, and measure

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 36 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

FIG. A14.5 High Rate Capacitance COD gage and C(T) Specimen with Attachment Holes

the initial crack length ao, and the final crack length af 0.5 JQu(t) to JQu(t), as the case may be. Extrapolate this line to

according to 8.5.5. the abscissa to evaluate the quantity tQ, as shown in Fig. A14.6.

A14.6.5 If the specimen is characterized by ductile upper A14.7.3.1 A second loading rate, (dJ/dt)T, is defined as the

shelf behavior, the normalization method of Annex A15 can be slope of the J versus time data beyond maximum load, as

used to develop the J-R(t) curve for the test specimen. Using shown in Fig. A14.6, over the range from JQ to JQ +

Section 9, calculate JQ (the tentative JIc) and the corresponding 0.5(Jmax−JQ) or the end of test, if fracture instability occurs.

load PQ and time tQ. If a ductile instability occurs so that the A14.7.4 Plot load versus load line displacement for the time

final stable crack length af cannot be determined, the normal- interval 0 # t # tQ, as shown schematically in Fig. A14.7. Use

ization method cannot be used to develop the J-R(t) curve or a linear regression analysis to evaluate the initial specimen

the corresponding JQ for this test specimen. stiffness ks using data over the range from 20 % to 50 % of the

A14.6.5.1 If a pop-in is present, refer to Annex A4 to assess maximum load measured in the test. Plot this best fit line on the

its significance. If the pop-in is significant, Jc(t) or Ju(t) values figure, and also plot two parallel lines of the same slope with

corresponding to the point of onset can be calculated using the y-intercept offset by 610 % of Pmax as shown in Fig.

Annex A6. If fracture instability occurs without significant A14.7. Locate the final crossover DLLF.

ductile crack extension, Jc(t) or Ju(t) values corresponding to A14.7.4.1 For this data set to be qualified according to this

the point of onset can be calculated as defined in Annex A6. If method, the compliance, 1/ks, shall agree with the predictions

fracture instability follows significant ductile crack extension, of Eq A2.10 for the C(T) specimen and Eq A1.9 for the SE(B)

the J-R(t) and JIc(t) can be determined providing that af is specimen within 610 %. Additionally, the measured load

distinguishable. The validity of the J-R(t) curve and JIc(t) are displacement data in the region between 0.3DLLF and 0.8DLLF

subject to the requirements of Annex A8, Annex A9, and should remain within the bounds of the parallel lines con-

Section 9. structed on Fig. A14.7. If these requirements are not met, slack

grips or impact absorbers must be added or modified or the test

A14.7 Qualification of the Data rate reduced to obtain a smoother data set that can be qualified

A14.7.1 Test equipment, specimen geometries, specimen according to this method.

fixture alignment, and measured data must meet all require- A14.7.5 If tQ< tw, the test data are not qualified according to

ments of Sections 6, 7, 8, and 9, except as specifically replaced this method. A slower loading rate must be used, or the

in A14.5. Additional requirements specified here are necessary specimen geometry changed to decrease tw for the test to be

for high rate testing. qualified according to this method.

A14.7.2 All of the test equipment requirements of A14.5 A14.7.6 If the normalization method of Annex A15 is used

shall be met. to obtain JIc, the J resistance curve, or both, at least one

A14.7.3 Plot the J integral versus the time as shown in Fig. confirmatory specimen must be tested at the same test rate and

A14.6. If fracture instability occurs, calculate J based on ao under the same test conditions. From the normalization method

using the basic analysis procedure and plot the data up to and the load line displacement corresponding to a ductile crack

including JQc(t) or JQu(t). Use a linear regression analysis to extension of 0.5 mm shall be estimated. The additional

evaluate (dJ/dt)I as shown in the example of Fig. A14.5 using specimen shall then be loaded to this load line displacement

the data from 0.5JQ(t) to JQ(t), from 0.5JQc(t) to JQc(t), or from level, marked, broken open and the ductile crack growth

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 37 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

FIG. A14.6 Evaluation of tQ and the Test Rates (dJ/dt)I and (dJ/dt)T

measured. The measured crack extension shall be 0.5 6 0.25 growth is a function of material variability, the precision of the

mm in order for these results to be qualified according to this various measurements of linear dimensions of the specimen

method. and testing fixtures, precision of the displacement measure-

ment, precision of the load measurement, as well as the

A14.8 Qualifying the High Rate Results

precision of the recording devices used to produce the load-

A14.8.1 All qualification requirements of 9.1, Annex A6, displacement record used to calculate J and crack length. For

Annex A8, Annex A9, and A14.7 must be met to qualify the the test rates allowed by this annex, if the procedures outlined

J-R(t) curve, JQ(t) as JIc(t), or JQc(t) as Jc(t) according to this in this annex are followed, the load and load-line displacement

method. If the normalization method of Annex A15 is used, the can be measured with an precision comparable with that of the

additional requirements of this annex shall also be met. static loading as described in the main body. If the normaliza-

A14.9 Report tion function method of Annex A15 is used, the crack length

and crack extension information must be inferred from initial

A14.9.1 The report shall include all the items of Section 10

as well as the following: and final crack length measurements. The requirement for the

A14.9.1.1 The minimum test time, tw, according to A14.6.2. additional specimen to be tested near to the point of crack

A14.9.1.2 The PQ and tQ, corresponding to the calculated initiation has been added to validate the JIc(t) measurement. A

JQ(t) or JQc(t). round robin used to evaluate the overall test procedures of this

A14.9.1.3 The (dJ/dt)I, (dJ/dt)T values, or both. method is reported in (20).

A14.9.1.4 If JIc(t) is being reported, the final crack exten- A14.10.2 Bias—There is no accepted “standard” value for

sion obtained on the confirmatory specimen of A14.7.6 shall be measures of elastic-plastic fracture toughness of any material.

reported. In absence of such a true value, any statement concerning bias

is not meaningful.

A14.10 Precision and Bias

A14.10.1 Precision—The precision of J versus crack

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 38 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

A15.1.1 The normalization technique can be used in some A15.2.2 Each load value Pi up to, but not including the

cases to obtain a J-R curve directly from a load displacement maximum load Pmax, is normalized using:

record taken together with initial and final crack length Pi

F G

PNi 5 W 2 abi hpl (A15.1)

measurements taken from the specimen fracture surface. Ad-

WB W

ditional restrictions are applied (see A14.1.3) which limit the

applicability of this method. The normalization technique is where abi is the blunting corrected crack length at the ith data

described more fully in Herrera and Landes (21) and Landes, et point given by:

al. (22), Lee (23), and Joyce (20). The normalization technique

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Ji

is most valuable for cases where high loading rates are used, or abi 5 ao 1 2 s (A15.2)

Y

where high temperatures or aggressive environments are being

used. In these, and other situations, unloading compliance with Ji calculated from:

methods are impractical. The normalization method can be Ki2 ~1 2 v2!

used for statically loaded specimens if the requirements of this Ji 5 E 1 Jpli (A15.3)

section are met. The normalization method is not applicable for

where Ki, hpl, and Jpli are calculated as in Annex A1 and

low toughness materials tested in large specimen sizes where

Annex A2 for each specimen type using the crack length ao.

large amounts of crack extension can occur without measurable

plastic load line displacement. A15.2.3 Each corresponding load line displacement is nor-

malized to give a normalized plastic displacement:

A15.2 Analysis vpli ~vi 2 Pi Ci!

v8pli 5 W 5 W (A15.4)

A15.2.1 The starting point for this analysis is a load versus

load point displacement record like that shown in Fig. A15.1. where Ci is the specimen elastic load line compliance based

Also required are initial and final physical crack lengths on the crack length abi, which can be calculated for each

optically measured from the fracture surface. This procedure is specimen type using the equations of Annex A1 and Annex A2.

applicable only to Test Method E 1820 standard specimen A15.2.4 The final measured crack length shall correspond to

geometries with 0.45 # ao/W # 0.70 and cannot be used if the a crack extension of not more than 4 mm or 15 % of the initial

final physical crack extension exceeds the lesser of 4 mm or uncracked ligament, whichever is less. If this crack extension

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 39 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

FIG. A15.1 Typical Load Versus Displacement Curve

is exceeded, this specimen can not be analyzed according to fall on the function defined in Equation A15.5. To do so, start

this annex. at the first data point with a positive plastic load line displace-

A15.2.5 The final load displacement pair shall be normal- ment, normalize the load and displacement using the initial

ized using the same equations as above except that the final measured crack size ao, and compare the normalized load with

measured crack length, af, is used. Typical normalized data are the result of the normalization function of A15.2.7. Adjust the

shown in Fig. A15.2. crack size until the measured PNi and the functional value of PN

A15.2.6 A line should be drawn from the final load displace- are within 60.1 %. Each subsequent data set is treated simi-

ment pair tangent to remaining data as shown in Fig. A15.2. larly. If each step is started with the crack length resulting from

Data to the right of this tangent point shall be excluded from the previous data set, only small, positive adjustments of crack

the normalization function fit. Data with vpli/W # 0.001 shall length are necessary, and the process of obtaining the crack

also be excluded from the normalization function fit. lengths corresponding to each data set is relatively rapid.

A15.2.7 If at least ten data pairs conform with A15.2.6, the A15.2.8.1 The data of Fig. A15.1, normalized and adjusted

data of Fig. A15.2 can be fit with the following required to fit the normalization function of Fig. A15.3 is shown in Fig.

analytical normalization function: A15.4.

a 1 b v8pl 1 c v8pl2 A15.2.9 Since load, load line displacement, and crack

PN 5 d 1 v8pl (A15.5) length estimates are now available at each data point, the

standard equations of Annex A1 and Annex A2 are used to

where a, b, c, and d are fitting coefficients. This function can

evaluate the J integral at each data point, resulting in a J-R

be fitted to the data of Fig. A15.1 using standard curve fitting

curve as shown in Fig. A15.5. A JIc value can now be

packages available as part of computer spreadsheet programs

evaluated from this J-R curve using the method of Section

or separately. An example fit for the data of Fig. A15.2 is

Annex A9.

shown in Fig. A15.3. The normalization function shall fit all

the data pairs described above (including the final pair) with a

A15.3 Additional Requirements

maximum deviation less than 1 % of the PN at the final point.

Data should be evenly spaced between vpli /W = 0.001 and the A15.3.1 Requirements presented in 9.1, Annex A8, and

tangency point. If less than ten data pairs are available for this Annex A9 shall be met to qualify a J-R curve or a JIc value

fit, including the final measured data pair, this method cannot obtained by the normalization method. Additional require-

be used. ments specific to the use of the normalization method are

A15.2.8 An iterative procedure is now used to force all PNi, presented below.

vpli/W, ai data to lie on Equation A15.5. This involves A15.3.2 If the normalization method is used to obtain JIc, at

adjusting the crack size of each data set to get the normalized least one additional, confirmatory specimen shall be tested at

load and displacement pair defined in A15.2.2 and A15.2.3 to the same test rate and under the same test conditions. From the

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 40 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

FIG. A15.2 Normalized Load Versus Displacement Curve Showing Points up to Maximum Load and the Final Data Point

normalization method the load line displacement correspond- allowed by this annex, if the procedures outlined in this annex

ing to a ductile crack extension of 0.5 mm shall be estimated. are followed, the crack length throughout the fracture tough-

The additional specimen shall then be loaded to this load line ness test can be measured with a precision comparable with

displacement level, marked, broken open and the ductile crack that of the unloading compliance procedure described in the

growth measured. The measured crack extension shall be 0.5 6 main body. A round robin describing the use of the normaliza-

0.25 mm in order for these results, and hence the JIc value, to tion procedure on rapidly loaded SE(B) and C(T) specimens is

be qualified according to this method. presented in (20). A requirement for the testing of a confirma-

tory specimen tested near the point of stable crack initiation is

A15.4 Report

present to validate the JIc measurement.

A15.4.1 Section 10 describes the reporting requirements for

A15.5.2 Bias—Crack lengths generally vary through the

this method. If the normalization function method is used the

thickness of fracture toughness specimens. A nine point aver-

following additional items shall be reported.

A15.4.2 If the normalization function is used the coeffi- age procedure based on optical measurements obtained from

cients of the fit shall be reported as well as the maximum the post-test fracture surface is generally used to give a

deviation of the fit and the number of data used. reportable crack length. Different measurements would be

A15.4.3 If JIc is reported, the accuracy of the confirmatory obtained using more or less measurement points. Alternative

specimen of A15.3.2 shall be reported. crack lengths can be estimated using compliance methods,

which obtain different average crack length estimates for

A15.5 Precision and Bias irregular crack front shapes. Stringent crack front straightness

A15.5.1 Precision—The precision of the J resistance curve requirements are present in this standard to minimize differ-

is a function of material variability, the precision of the various ences caused by these effects. The normalization method acts

measurements of linear dimensions of the specimen and testing to interpolate between optically measured crack average

fixtures, precision of the displacement measurement, precision lengths measured at the start and end of the stable resistance

of the load measurement, as well as the precision of the curve fracture toughness test. This method has been demon-

recording devices used to produce the load-displacement strated in (20) to give results consistent with those obtained by

record used to calculate J and crack length. For the test rates unloading compliance procedures.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 41 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

FIG. A15.3 The Normalization Function Shown Fitted to the Normalization Data

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 42 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

E 1820

FIG. A15.4 Data is Adjusted, Defining the Crack Length Necessary to Place All Points on the Analytical Normalization Function. (Only a

portion of the data is shown for clarity.)

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 43 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

APPENDIX

(Nonmandatory Information)

X1.1 Fig. X1.1 To fit Eq A9.1 to the Ji, ai data using the

method of least squares, the following equation must be set up

and solved for aoq, B, and C:

standard spreadsheet. The following listing gives a Microsoft

QuickBASIC program listing that can also be used to accom-

plish this process. This algorithm can be easily modified to

perform the fit for CTOD calculations required in C4.4.1.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

FIG. X1.1 BASIC Program (continued)

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 44 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

FIG. X1.1 BASIC Program (continued)

REFERENCES

(1) Joyce, J. A., and Tregoning, R. L., “Development of Consistent Size High Strength Steel Using Key Curve and Multi-Specimen Tech-

Criteria for ASTM Combined Fracture Mechanics Standards,” Fatigue niques,” Fracture Mechanics,Seventeenth Volume, ASTM STP 905,

and Fracture Mechanics, Vol 30, ASTM STP 1360, P. C. Paris, et al, ASTM, 1986, pp. 741–774.

eds., ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 1999. (6) Hellman, D., Rohwerder, G., and Schwalbe, K. H.,“ Development of

(2) Joyce, J. A., “Manual on Elastic-Plastic Fracture: Laboratory Test a Test Setup for Measuring Deflections of Single Edge Notched Bend

Procedures,” ASTM Manual Series MNL 27, 1996. (SENB) Specimens,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol 12, No. 1,

(3) Dawes, M. G.,“ Elastic-Plastic Fracture Toughness Based on the COD January 1984, pp. 62–64.

and J-Integral Concepts,” Elastic-Plastic Fracture ASTM STP 668, J. (7) KarisAllen, K. J. and Mathews, J. R., “The Determination of Single

D. Landes, J. A. Begley, and G. A. Clarke, eds., ASTM, 1979, pp. Edge-Notched Bend Specimen Load-Line Displacement from Re-

307–333. motely Located Sensors in Elastic-Plastic Fracture Testing,” Journal of

(4) Willoughby, A. A., and Garwood, S. J., “On the Loading Compliance Testing and Evaluation, JTEVA, Vol 22, No. 6, Nov. 1994, pp.

Method of Deriving Single Specimen RCurves in Three Point Bend- 581-583.

ing,” Elastic-Plastic Fracture: Second Symposium, Volume II— (8) McCabe, D. E., “Evaluation of the Compact Specimen for Plane Strain

Fracture Resistance Curves and Engineering Applications, ASTM STP Fracture Toughness of High Strength Materials,” Journal of Materials,

803, C. F. Shih and J. P. Gudas, eds., ASTM, 1983, pp. II-372–II-397. Vol 7, No. 4, December 1972, p. 449.

(5) Hackett, E. M., and Joyce, J. A., “Dynamic J-R Curve Testing of a (9) Begley, J. A., Clarke, G. A., and Landes, J. D., “Results of an ASTM

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 45 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

E 1820

Cooperative Test Program on the JIc Determination of HY-130 Steel,” (17) Shoemaker, A. K., and Seeley, R. R., “Summary Report of Round

Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol 8, No. 5, September 1980. Robin Testing By ASTM Task Group E24.01.06 on Rapid Loading

(10) Gudas, J. P., and Davis, D. A., “Evaluation of the Tentative JI-R Plane Strain Fracture Toughness KIc Testing,” Journal of Testing and

Curve Testing Procedure by Round Robin Tests of HY-130 Steel,” Evaluation, Vol 11, No. 4, July 1983.

Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol 10, No. 6, November 1982, (18) Nakamura, T., Shih, C.F., and Freund, L.B., “Analysis of a Dynami-

pp. 252–262. cally Loaded Three-Point-Bend Ductile Fracture Specimen,” Engi-

(11) Srawley, J. E., “Wide Range Stress Intensity Factor Expressions for neering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1986, pp. 323–339.

ASTM E399 Standard Fracture Toughness Specimens,” International (19) Joyce, J.A., and Hackett, E.M., “An Advanced Procedure for J-R

Journal of Fracture, Vol 12, June 1976, pp. 475–476. Curve Testing Using a Drop Tower,” Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics:

(12) Newman, J. C., Jr., “Stress Analysis of the Compact Specimen Vol. 1–Time Dependent Fracture, ASTM STP 995, A. Saxena, J.D.

Including the Effects of Pin Loading,” ASTM STP 560, 1974, pp. Landes, and J.L. Bassani, Eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, 1989, pp.

105–121. 298–317.

(13) Newman, J. C., Jr., “Stress Intensity Factors and Crack Opening (20) Joyce, J.A., “Analysis of the E08.02 High Rate Round Robin,”

Displacements for Round Compact Specimens,” International Jour- Journal of Testing and Evaluation, JTEVA, Vol. 29. No. 4. July 2001,

nal of Fracture, 17(6), December 1981, pp. 567–578. pp. 329–351.

(14) Underwood, J. H., Kapp, J. A., and Baratta, F. I., “More on (21) Herrera, R., and Landes, J.D., “Direct J-R Curve Analysis: A Guide

Compliance of the Three-Point Bend Specimen,” International Jour- to the Methodology,” Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-First Symposium,

nal of Fracture, Vol 28, 1985, pp. R41–R45. ASTM STP 1074, J.P. Gudas, J.A. Joyce, and E.M. Hackett, Eds.,

(15) Saxena, A., and Hudak, S. J., “Review and Extension of Compliance ASTM, Conshohocken, PA, 1990, pp 24–43.

Information for Common Crack Growth Specimens,” International (22) Landes, J.D., Zhou, Z., Lee, K., and Herrera, R., “Normalization

Journal of Fracture, Vol 14, October 1978, pp. 453–468. Method for Developing J-R Curves with the LMN Function,” Journal

(16) Yoon, K. K., Gross, L. B., Wade, C. S., and VanDerSluys, W. A., of Testing and Evaluation, JTEVA, Vol. 19, No. 4, July 1991, pp.

“Evaluation of Disk-Shaped Specimen for Determining J-R Curves,” 305–311.

Fracture Mechanics: 26th Volume, ASTM STP 1256, W. G. Reuter, J. (23) Lee, Kang, “Elastic-Plastic Fracture Toughness Determination Under

H. Underwood, and J. C. Newman, eds., American Society for Some Difficult Conditions,” Ph.D Dissertation, The University of

Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1995. Tennessee, Knoxville, August, 1995.

ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned

in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk

of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.

--``,,,,``,,,,,```,``,`,``,``,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and

if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards

and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the

responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should

make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.

This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,

United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above

address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website

(www.astm.org).

COPYRIGHT 2003; ASTM International 46 Document provided by IHS Licensee=MIT Libraries/6110146001, User=, 10/10/2003

10:08:20 MDT Questions or comments about this message: please call the Document

Policy Group at 1-800-451-1584.

- E436-03(2014) Standard Test Method for Drop-Weight Tear Tests of Ferritic Steels.pdfUploaded bydiego rodriguez
- FE Pipe DocumentacionUploaded byricardobarort
- Pressure Vessel Design12Uploaded byVictor Rizal Filosofi
- Failure AnalysisUploaded byjcfermosell
- Failure ModelsUploaded byratko88
- ProblemSet 4 SolutionsUploaded byPuji Widodo
- Fracture MechanicsUploaded byLuis Alberto Ruiz Pestaña
- Teknologi Bahan_2 Analisis Kegagalan Material_Herman(1)Uploaded byWiwi Wulan Sari
- Fracture ControlUploaded byleonjoan
- Loss of constraint during fracture toughness testing of duplex stainless steels.pdfUploaded byAli Wakaa
- Beam Column JointUploaded byMadhusudan Mandal
- 1-2Uploaded byGeri Ba
- EVALUATION OF 8090 AND WELDALITE-049 ALUMINUM-LITHIUM ALLOYSUploaded byskylancer-3441
- Caceres-L3 Understanding Materials Selection ChartsUploaded byUngku Mohd Rafiq
- LS-Dyna Simulated Crack in Several WaysUploaded byMubeen
- 1-s2.0-S0020768309002662-mainUploaded byAkash Aku
- 3-14Uploaded bypitoulabete
- Fracture Mechanics PodrecznikUploaded bynetkasia
- 13 Lecture Week 5 Version2Uploaded byG00GLR
- Effect of Thickness and Notch Radius on Fracture Toughness of PolycrbonateUploaded byMeliissa Franco
- Melander 1993Uploaded byaion_reb
- Effect of Notch Angle on the Fracture Toughness of Al7075 T6 Alloy- An Experimental ApproachUploaded byInternational Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR)
- lec24Uploaded byaravind kumar
- fracture mechanicsUploaded byLeila Moghadas
- paper_5Uploaded byFahrgeruste
- Allowable StressUploaded byfauzi
- Crack Plane Influence on Time-Dependent Fracture of BimaterialsUploaded bySheng Lai
- Fracture and Fratic Damage of RailsUploaded byerikjan1000
- 0e2d6e527e5df8c1fa6a6024b6c5baa3Uploaded bysendi
- Numerical ExamplesUploaded byWest East

- Finite element introUploaded bysenselessapprentice
- vibration analysisUploaded byvalentinbecerra
- ch3_wavesUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- CB-18 simple structs; EI, Euler.pdfUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Numan Chap2Uploaded byHaseeb Nawaz
- Yeild CriterionUploaded byravindrababug
- DNV-OS-F101 - Submarine Pipeline SystemUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- oth551 - The update of Loss of Containment Data for Offshore Pipeline.pdfUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- LCC-0094 Text - The Turbulence Induced VibrationUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Horrocks Et Al. - Managing Ageing PlantUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Sparse Recovery (Sparse Matrices)Uploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Erosion CorrosionUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- NI Tutorial 4844 en Understanding FFT and WindowingUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Damped VibrationsUploaded byParvesh Dahiya
- Matrix Finite Element Methods in DynamicsUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- The Fourier Transform and its ApplicationsUploaded bymachinelearner
- Notes on Nonlinear VibrationsUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Chapter 7 - FEMUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Energy Method EasyUploaded bysharief91
- ch2Uploaded byDinesh Perumalsamy
- Abaqus and PythonUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- 2D Triangular ElementsUploaded byC V CHANDRASHEKARA
- Abaqus Adaptive MeshingUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Machine LearningUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Roots Finding Techniques for Non Linear EqUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Fourier SeriesUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Gauss Elimination in Numerical MethodUploaded bypaivensolidsnake
- Vector and Matrix normUploaded bymamurtaza

- Chapter 1. Introduction to Rcc DocxUploaded byHaftom Gebreegziabiher
- 58 Weld Repairs- Creep PerformanceUploaded byLTE002
- Solutions+for+Homework+2+ Textbook+ProblemsUploaded byJianfeng Lee
- Acoustic Properties of GlassUploaded byFilly Naomi
- Fin DesignUploaded bySachin Verma
- 13_AP093Uploaded byAcid Hadi
- CVG3109 Elastic TheoryUploaded byOusama Kadri
- Main FileUploaded bydesign_amrita
- Large deformation plasticity and MPM (working paper)Uploaded byb.banerjee.nz6800
- At6401 Atht Rejinpaul April.may2016 IqUploaded byrejinpaulpaul
- TOF AssignmentUploaded byClinton
- 17- Stress-Strain Behavior, PhD ProposalUploaded byNaghizadehrokni
- The 2nd Law of ThermodynamicsUploaded byYousef Al-Taai
- Nastran StaticUploaded byRohit Acharya
- ChE291 ManualUploaded byDaniel Cho
- SPE-103617-MS_Laboratory Hydraulic Fracturing Test on a Rock With Artificial DiscontinuitiesUploaded bycastille1956
- compreUploaded byLara Mariz Gatbonton
- Tips and Tricks for Faster Simulation Convergence v6Uploaded byLima Limón Limonero
- Chemical Thermodynamics IIT Part 1Uploaded bySanjay Ap
- vacuum ejectorsUploaded byEnrique Vargas
- 16 ThermodynamicsUploaded byapuszis
- Heat Transfer ObjectivesUploaded byAnil Frivolous Abstemious
- Standard Test Methods for Rheological Properties of Non-Newtonian Materials by Rotational (Brookfield type) ViscometerUploaded byRodrigo Lopez
- tpesyllUploaded bypachiedu
- Engg Mechanics-3rd Sessional PaperUploaded byVivek Srivastava
- FEM for Nitinol_stentUploaded byDaole Van
- Well Logging Fundamental InformationUploaded byNguyen Duc Minh
- Heat Transfer on Internal Combustion EngineUploaded bySatyam kumar Upadhyay
- Stresses in Flanged and Dished HeadsUploaded bytrisha1234567
- Investigation on Adsorption Refrigeration With Single Adsorbent BedUploaded byElijah Kabson