You are on page 1of 13

Ballistic missile submarine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USS George Washington (SSBN-598)–the lead boat of US Navy's first class of Fleet Ballistic Missile
submarines (SSBN). George Washington was the first operational nuclear-powered multi-missile strategic
deterrence asset fielded by any navy.

Soviet Project 667BD (Delta II class)nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine

A ballistic missile submarine is a submarine deploying submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs)


with nuclear warheads. These submarines became a major weapon system in the Cold War because of
their nuclear deterrence capability. They can fire missiles thousands of kilometers from their targets,
and acoustic quieting makes them very difficult to detect (see acoustic signature), thus making them a
survivable deterrent in the event of a first strike and a key element of the mutual assured
destruction policy of nuclear deterrence. Their deployment has been dominated by the United States and
the Soviet Union / Russia, with smaller numbers in service with France, theUnited Kingdom, China, and
most recently India.

Contents
[hide]

 1History
o 1.1SSBN origins
o 1.2Deployment and further development
o 1.3Poseidon and Trident I
o 1.4Trident and Typhoon submarines
o 1.5Post-Cold War
 2Purpose
 3Armament
 4Terminology
 5Active classes
 6Classes under development
 7Retired classes
 8Accidents
 9References
 10Bibliography
 11External links

History[edit]
The examples and perspective in this section may not represent
a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article,
discuss the issue on the talk page. (December 2015) (Learn how and
when to remove this template message)

The first sea-based missile deterrent forces were a small number of conventionally powered cruise
missile submarines(SSG) and surface ships fielded by the United States and the Soviet Union in the
1950s, deploying the Regulus I missileand the Soviet P-5 Pyatyorka (SS-N-3 Shaddock), both land
attack cruise missiles that could be launched from surfaced submarines. Although these forces served
until 1964 and (on the Soviet side) were augmented by the nuclear-poweredProject 659 (Echo I
class) SSGNs, they were rapidly eclipsed by SLBMs carried by nuclear-powered ballistic missile
submarines (SSBNs) beginning in 1960.[1]
SSBN origins[edit]
The first nation to field ballistic missile submarines (SSB) was the Soviet Union, whose first experimental
SSB was a converted Project 611 (Zulu IV class) submarine equipped with a single ballistic missile
launch tube in its sail. This submarine launched the world's first SLBM, an R-11FM (SS-N-1 Scud-A,
naval modification of SS-1 Scud) on 16 September 1955.[2] Five additional Project V611 and AV611
(Zulu-V class) submarines became the world's first operational SSBs with two R-11FM missiles each,
entering service in 1956-57.[3] They were followed by a series of 23 specifically designed Project
629 (Golf class) SSBs completed 1958-62, with three vertical launch tubes incorporated in the sail/fin of
each submarine.[4] The initial R-13 (SS-N-4) ballistic missiles could only be launched with the submarine
on the surface and the missile raised to the top of the launch tube, but were followed by R-21 (SS-N-
5) missiles beginning in 1963, which were launched with the submarine submerged.
The world's first operational SSBN was USS George Washington (SSBN-598) with 16 Polaris A-
1 missiles, which entered service in December 1959 and conducted the first SSBN deterrent patrol
November 1960-January 1961.[5] The Polaris missile and the first US SSBNs were developed by a
Special Project office under Rear Admiral W. F. "Red" Raborn, appointed by Chief of Naval
Operations Admiral Arleigh Burke. George Washington was redesigned and rebuilt early in construction
from a Skipjack-class fast attack submarine, USS Scorpion, with a 130 ft (40 m) missile compartment
welded into the middle. Nuclear power was a crucial advance, allowing a ballistic missile submarine to
remain undetected at sea by remaining submerged or occasionally at periscope depth (50 to 55 feet) for
an entire patrol. A significant difference between US and Soviet SLBMs was the fuel type; all US SLBMs
have been solid fueled while all Soviet and Russian SLBMs were liquid fueled except for the
Russian RSM-56 Bulava, which entered service in 2014. With more missiles on one US SSBN than on
five Golf-class boats, the Soviets rapidly fell behind in sea-based deterrent capability. The Soviets were
only a year behind the US with their first SSBN, the ill-fated K-19 of Project 658 (Hotel class),
commissioned in November 1960. However, this class carried the same three-missile armament as the
Golfs. The first Soviet SSBN with 16 missiles was theProject 667A (Yankee class), the first of which
entered service in 1967, by which time the US had commissioned 41 SSBNs, nicknamed the "41 for
Freedom".[6][7]
Deployment and further development[edit]
The short range of the early SLBMs dictated basing and deployment locations. By the late 1960s the
Polaris A-3 was deployed on all US SSBNs with a range of 4,600 kilometres (2,500 nmi), a great
improvement on the 1,900 kilometres (1,000 nmi) range of Polaris A-1. The A-3 also had three warheads
that landed in a pattern around a single target.[8][9] The Yankee class was initially equipped with the R-27
Zyb missile (SS-N-6) with a range of 2,400 kilometres (1,300 nmi). The US was much more fortunate in
its basing arrangements than the Soviets. Thanks to NATO and the US possession ofGuam, US SSBNs
were permanently forward deployed at Advanced Refit Sites in Holy Loch, Scotland; Rota, Spain; and
Guam by the middle 1960s, resulting in short transit times to patrol areas near the Soviet Union. With two
rotating crews per SSBN, about one-third of the total US force could be in a patrol area at any time. The
Soviet bases, in the Murmanskarea for the Atlantic and the Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky area for
the Pacific, required their SSBNs to make a long transit (through NATO-monitored waters in the Atlantic)
to their mid-ocean patrol areas to hold the continental United States (CONUS) at risk. This resulted in
only a small percentage of the Soviet force occupying patrol areas at any time, and was a great
motivation for longer-range Soviet SLBMs, which would allow them to patrol close to their bases, in areas
sometimes referred to as "deep bastions". These missiles were the R-29 Vysota series (SS-N-8, SS-N-
18, SS-N-23), equipped onProjects 667B, 667BD, 667BDR, and 667BDRM (Delta-I through Delta-IV
[10]
classes). The SS-N-8, with a range of 7,700 kilometres (4,200 nmi), entered service on the first Delta-I
boat in 1972, before the Yankee class was even completed. A total of 43 Delta-class boats of all types
entered service 1972-90, with the SS-N-18 on the Delta III class and the R-29RM Shtil (SS-N-23) on the
Delta IV class.[11][12][13][14] The new missiles had increased range and eventually Multiple Independently-
targeted Re-entry Vehicles (MIRV), multiple warheads that could each hit a different target.[10] The Delta-I
class had 12 missiles each; the others have 16 missiles each. All Deltas have a tall superstructure (aka
casing) to accommodate their large liquid-fueled missiles.
Poseidon and Trident I[edit]
Although the US did not commission any new SSBNs from 1967 through 1981, they did introduce two
new SLBMs. Thirty-one of the 41 original US SSBNs were built with larger diameter launch tubes with
future missiles in mind. In the early 1970s the Poseidon (C-3) missile entered service, and those 31
SSBNs were backfitted with it.[15] Poseidon offered a massive MIRV capability of up to 14 warheads per
missile. Like the Soviets, the US also desired a longer-range missile that would allow SSBNs to be based
in CONUS. In the late 1970s the Trident I (C-4) missile was backfitted to 12 of the Poseidon-equipped
submarines.[16][17] The SSBN facilities of the base at Rota, Spain were disestablished and the Naval
Submarine Base King's Bay in Georgia was built for the Trident I-equipped force.
Trident and Typhoon submarines[edit]
USS Alabama (SSBN-731), an Ohio class (aka Trident) submarine.

A Project 941 (Typhoon class) SSBN.

Both the United States and the Soviet Union commissioned larger SSBNs designed for new missiles in
1981. The American large SSBN was the Ohio class, also called the "Trident submarine", with the largest
SSBN armament ever of 24 missiles, initially Trident I but built with much larger tubes for the Trident II (D-
5) missile, which entered service in 1990.[18][19] The entire class was converted to use Trident II by the
early 2000s. When the USS Ohio (SSBN-726) commenced sea trials in 1980, two Benjamin Franklin
class US SSBNs had their missiles removed to comply with SALT treaty requirements; the remaining
eight were converted to attack submarines (SSN) by the end of 1982. These were all in the Pacific, and
the Guam SSBN base was disestablished; the first several Ohio-class boats used new Trident facilities
at Naval Submarine Base Bangor, Washington. EighteenOhio-class boats were commissioned by
1997,[20] four of which were converted as cruise missile submarines (SSGN) in the 2000s to comply
with START I treaty requirements. The Soviet large SSBN was the Project 941 Akula, famous as the
Typhoon class (and not to be confused with the Project 971 Shchuka attack submarine, called "Akula" by
NATO). The Typhoons were the largest submarines ever built at 48,000 tons submerged. They were
[21]
armed with 20 of the newR-39 Rif (SS-N-20) missiles. Six Typhoons were commissioned 1981-89. A
Typhoon was the subject of Tom Clancy's novel The Hunt for Red October.
Post-Cold War[edit]

K-535 Yury Dolgorukiy, the first Borei-class submarine, during sea trials

New SSBN construction terminated for over 10 years in Russia and slowed in the US with the collapse of
the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War in 1991. The US rapidly decommissioned its remaining 31
older SSBNs, with a few converted to other roles, and the base at Holy Loch was disestablished. Most of
the former Soviet SSBN force was gradually scrapped under the provisions of the Nunn–Lugar
Cooperative Threat Reduction agreement through 2012.[22] By that time the Russian SSBN force stood at
six Delta-IVs, three Delta-IIIs, and a lone Typhoon used as a testbed for new missiles (the R-39s unique
to the Typhoons were reportedly scrapped in 2012). Upgraded missiles such as the R-29RMU
Sineva (SS-N-23 Sineva) were developed for the Deltas. In 2013 the Russians commissioned the
first Borei-class submarine, also called the Dolgorukiy class after the lead vessel. By 2015 two others had
entered service. This class is intended to replace the aging Deltas, and carries 16 solid-fuel RSM-56
Bulavamissiles, with a reported range of 10,000 kilometres (5,400 nmi) and six MIRV warheads. The US
is designing areplacement for the Ohio class; however, as of early 2015 none have been laid down.
Arihant-class submarines are nuclear powered SSBNs built under the Advanced Technology
Vessel (ATV) project byIndia.[23][24][25][26][27][28] They will be the first nuclear submarines designed and built
by India.[29]

Purpose[edit]
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this
section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material
may be challenged andremoved. (June 2013) (Learn how and when
to remove this template message)
Further information: Second strike and Nuclear triad
Ballistic missile submarines differ in purpose from attack submarines and cruise missile submarines; while
attack submarines specialize in combat with other vessels (including enemy submarines and merchant
shipping), and cruise missile submarines are designed to attack large warships and tactical targets on
land, the primary mission of the ballistic missile is nuclear deterrence. They serve as the third leg of
the nuclear triad in countries which also operate nuclear-armed land based missiles and aircraft.
Accordingly, the mission profile of a ballistic missile submarine concentrates on remaining undetected,
rather than aggressively pursuing other vessels. Ballistic missile submarines are designed for stealth, to
avoid detection at all costs. Nuclear power, allowing almost the entire patrol to be conducted submerged,
is of great importance to this. They also use many sound-reducing design features, such as anechoic
tiles on their hull surfaces, carefully designed propulsion systems, and machinery mounted on vibration-
damping mounts. The invisibility and mobility of SSBNs offer a reliable means of deterrence against an
attack (by maintaining the threat of a second strike), as well as a potential surprise first strike capability.

Armament[edit]
Main article: Submarine-launched ballistic missile
In most cases, SSBNs generally resemble attack subs of the same generation, with extra length to
accommodate SLBMs, such as the Russian R-29 (SS-N-23) or the NATO-fielded and American-
manufactured Polaris, Poseidon, and Trident-IImissiles. Some early models had to surface to launch their
missiles, but modern vessels typically launch while submerged at keel depths of usually less than
50 meters (164 feet). Missiles are launched upwards with an initial velocity sufficient for them to pop
above the surface, at which point their rocket motors fire, beginning the characteristic parabolic climb-
from-launch of a ballistic missile. Compressed air ejection, later replaced by gas-steam ejection, was
developed by Captain Harry Jackson of Rear Admiral Raborn's Special Project Office when a proposed
missile elevator proved too complex.[30]Jackson also derived the armament of 16 missiles used in many
SSBNs for the George Washington class in 1957, based on a compromise between firepower and hull
integrity.[31]

Terminology[edit]
SSBN is the US Navy hull classification symbol for a nuclear-powered, ballistic missile-carrying
submarine.[32] The SSdenotes "Submarine" (alternatively "Ship, Submersible"), the B denotes "ballistic
missile," and the N denotes "nuclear powered." The designation SSBN is also used throughout NATO
under STANAG 1166.[33]
In the US Navy, SSBNs are sometimes called Fleet Ballistic Missile submarines, or FBMs. In US naval
slang, ballistic missile submarines are called boomers. In Britain, they are known as bombers.[34] In both
cases, SSBN submarines operate on a two-crew concept, with two complete crews - including two
captains - called Gold and Blue in the United States, Starboard and Port in the United Kingdom.
The French Navy commissioned its first ballistic missile submarines as SNLE, for Sous-marin Nucléaire
Lanceur d'Engin(lit. "nuclear-powered device-launching submarines"). The term applies both to ballistic
missile submarines in general (for instance "British SNLE" occurs [35]) and, more technically, as a specific
classification of the Redoutable class. The more recent Triomphant class is referred to as SNLE-NG
(Nouvelle Génération, "New Generation"). The two crews used to maximise the availability time of the
boats are called 'blue' and 'red' crews.
The Soviets called this type of ship RPKSN[36] (lit. "Strategic Purpose Underwater Missile Cruiser"). This
designation was applied to the Typhoon class. Another designation used was PLARB(«ПЛАРБ» -
подводная лодка атомная с баллистическими ракетами, which translates as "Nuclear Submarine with
Ballistic Missiles"). This designation was applied to smaller submarines such as the Delta class. After a
peak in 1984 (following Able Archer 83), Russian SSBN deterrence patrols have declined to the point
where there is less than one patrol per sub each year and at best one sub on patrol at any time. Hence
[37]
the Russians do not use multiple crews per boat.

Active classes[edit]

HMS Vanguard, a Royal NavyVanguard-class submarine


A Chinese Navy Type 094 submarine

French submarine Téméraire, aFrench Navy Triomphant-class submarine

 France
 Triomphant class - 4 in service
 India
 Arihant class - 1 in service[38][39]
 People's Republic of China
 Type 092 submarine - 1 in service
 Type 094 submarine - 5 in service out of 8 planned.[40][41]
 Russia
 Borei class - 3 active, 4 more under construction Sevmash.[42][43]
 Typhoon class - 1 in service (2 in reserve)
 Delta III and Delta IV classes - 3 Delta III class in service, 6 Delta
IV class in service
 United Kingdom
 Vanguard class - 4 in service
 United States
 Ohio class - 18 in service (of which 4 have been converted
into cruise missile submarines)

Classes under development[edit]

 People's Republic of China


 Type 096[44]
 India
 Arihant class[45] 1 commissioned. 2 under construction. Total 6
[46][47]
planned.
 North Korea
 Sinpo-class submarine are North Korea's newest submarine class.
Prior to 2015, there were only satellite images of these
submarines. On May 9, 2015, the first Sinpo-class launched the
first KN-11 ballistic missile under the supervision of Kim Jong
Un himself. The test was successful. Since then, there have been
five test firings of the KN-11, which can be nuclear armed. It is
reported that North Korea is building five more Sinpo-class
submarines.
 Russia
 Borei class 1 active, 2 are in trials 7 under development
in Sevmash.[42]
 United Kingdom
 Dreadnought-class[48][49][50][51]
 United States
 Ohio Replacement Submarine[52][53][54]

Retired classes[edit]

The French SNLE Le Redoutable

USS Sam Rayburnshowing the hatches for herUGM-27 Polaris missiles

France

 Redoutable class
/ Soviet Union / Russia

 Zulu V class (with a single Zulu IV prototype) (diesel powered)


 Golf I class (diesel powered)
 Golf II class (diesel powered)
 Hotel I class
 Hotel II class
 Yankee class
 Yankee II class
 Delta I class
 Delta II class
United Kingdom

 Resolution class
United States

 George Washington class


 Ethan Allen class
 Lafayette class
 James Madison class
 Benjamin Franklin class
 These five classes are collectively referred to as "41 for Freedom".

Accidents[edit]
Main article: HMS Vanguard and Le Triomphant submarine collision
On 4 February 2009, the British HMS Vanguard (S28) and the French Triomphant collided in the
Atlantic.[55][56][57]Vanguard returned to Faslane in Scotland, under her own power,[58] and Triomphant to Île
Longue in Brittany.

References[edit]

1. Jump up^ Gardiner and Chumbley, pp. 352-353, 549, 553-554


2. Jump up^ Wade, Mark. "R-11". Encyclopedia Astronautica.
Retrieved 23 April 2011.
3. Jump up^ "Large submarines - Project 611". Retrieved 26
July2015.
4. Jump up^ "Ballistic missile submarines - Project 629".
Retrieved26 July 2015.
5. Jump up^ "Man and the FBM: The US Navy deploys its 1st
Polaris Ballistic Missile Subs" on YouTube
6. Jump up^ Gardiner & Chumbley, p. 403
7. Jump up^ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines - Project
667A". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
8. Jump up^ Friedman, pp. 199-200
9. Jump up^ Polmar 1981, pp. 131-133
10. ^ Jump up to:a b Gardiner and Chumbley, pp. 355-357
11. Jump up^ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines - Project
667B". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
12. Jump up^ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines - Project
667BD". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
13. Jump up^ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines - Project
667BDR". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
14. Jump up^ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines - Project
667BDRM". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
15. Jump up^ Friedman, p. 201
16. Jump up^ Gardiner and Chumbley, pp. 553-554
17. Jump up^ Friedman, p. 206
18. Jump up^ Friedman, pp. 206-207
19. Jump up^ Gardiner and Chumbley, p. 554
20. Jump up^ Gardiner and Chumbley, p. 613
21. Jump up^ "Nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines - Project
941". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
22. Jump up^ "Verifying". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
23. Jump up^ "Indian indigenous nuclear sub to be unveiled on 26
July: report". domain-b.com. 16 July 2009. Retrieved24
January 2011.
24. Jump up^ "India nuclear sub project near completion". Reuters. 12
February 2009. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
25. Jump up^ "PM to launch indigenous nuke submarine by month-
end". MSN. 16 July 2009. Retrieved 19 July 2009.
26. Jump up^ "Indigenous nuclear submarine goes on trial". The
Hindu. Chennai, India. 19 July 2009. Retrieved 19 July2009.
27. Jump up^ Sud, Hari (14 August 2009). "India's nuclear submarine
and the Indian Ocean". upiasia.com. Retrieved24 January 2011.
28. Jump up^ "India's nuclear submarine dream, still miles to
go".Reuters. 31 July 2009. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
29. Jump up^ "Final test of K-15 ballistic missile on Tuesday". 25
February 2008. Retrieved 24 January 2012.
30. Jump up^ Friedman, p. 194
31. Jump up^ Friedman, pp. 195-196
32. Jump up^ "SECNAVINST 5030.8" (PDF). United States Navy. 21
November 2006. Retrieved 10 September 2008.
33. Jump up^ "NATO glossary of abbreviations used in NATO
documents and publications (AAP-11)" (PDF). NATO. Retrieved 1
February 2014.
34. Jump up^ "Submarine Service - Royal Navy". Retrieved 26
July2015.
35. Jump up^ "SNLE-NG Le Triomphant". netmarine.net. Archived
from the original on May 21, 2014. Retrieved 19 October2014.
36. Jump up^ РПКСН Ракетный подводный крейсер
стратегического назначения (Raketny Podvodnyy Kreiser
Strategicheskogo Naznacheniya)
37. Jump up^ "Russian SSBN Fleet: Modernizing But Not Sailing
Much". Federation of American Scientists. 3 May 2013. Archived
from the original on December 17, 2013. Retrieved 19
October 2014.
38. Jump up^ Diplomat, Saurav Jha, The. "India's Undersea
Deterrent". The Diplomat. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
39. Jump up^ "Commissioning of INS Kalvari delayed | The Asian
Age". The Asian Age. Retrieved 2016-10-16.
40. Jump up^ "Does China have an effective sea-based nuclear
deterrent?". ChinaPowerCSIS.
41. Jump up^ http://www.janes.com/article/50761/us-upgrades-
assessment-of-china-s-type-094-ssbn-fleet
42. ^ Jump up to:a b "Russia to start building 2 nuclear Borei super-
subs in 2013". RT.com. 12 January 2013. Retrieved 19
October2014.
43. Jump up^ "Finally flying colors: Yury Dolgoruky nuclear sub joins
Russian Navy". RT.com. 10 January 2013. Retrieved19
October 2014.
44. Jump up^ Chang, Andrei (3 March 2008), Satellite Images
Provide Insight Into Chinese Ballistic Missile Submarine
Capabilities, NTI.org, archived from the original on 30 August 2008
45. Jump up^ "Construction in full-swing on India's 2nd and 3rd
Nuclear Submarine — Defence Update | Defence Update".Defence
News, Defence Update, India Defence News, Indian Defence
News, Indian Defence, Indian Armed Forces, Indian Army, Indian
Navy, Indian Air Force. 2015-12-17. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
46. Jump up^ Subranamiam, T.S. (26 July 2009). "Nuclear submarine
all set to enter waters". The Hindu. Retrieved 19 October2014.
47. Jump up^ "India set to launch home-built nuclear submarine".
Vancouver Sun. 2012-08-10. Retrieved 2012-08-21.
48. Jump up^ "New Successor Submarines Named" (Press release).
Gov.uk. 21 October 2016. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
49. Jump up^ "New nuclear submarine given famous naval
name".BBC News. Retrieved 21 October 2016.
50. Jump up^ "Q&A: Trident replacement". BBC News. 11 November
2006. Archived from the original on 7 December 2006.
Retrieved 2006-12-01.
51. Jump up^ "The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear
Deterrent" (PDF). Ministry of Defence. 4 December
2006.Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 December 2006.
Retrieved 2006-12-05.
52. Jump up^ Weinberger, Sharon Weinberger Sharon (11 May
2010)."Five Big-Ticket Pentagon Programs in the Cross Hairs".Aol
news. AOL Inc. Archived from the original on 14 May 2010.
Retrieved 11 May 2010.
53. Jump up^ Chavanne, Bettina. "Gates Says U.S. Navy Plans Are
Unaffordable". The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Retrieved 12
May 2010.
54. Jump up^ Unnithan, Sandeep (23 July 2009). "Deep impact".
indiatoday. Retrieved 19 October 2014.
55. Jump up^ "British and French nuclear submarines crash". The
Sun. London. 16 February 2009. Retrieved 2009-02-16.
56. Jump up^ Allen, Peter; Kelly, Tom (17 February 2009). "British
and French submarines packed with nuclear missiles collide
beneath the Atlantic". London: The Daily Mail. Retrieved2009-02-
16.
57. Jump up^ Williams, Rachel (16 February 2009). "Nuclear
submarines collide in Atlantic". London: The Guardian.
Retrieved2009-02-16.
58. Jump up^ "Nuclear subs collide in Atlantic". BBC News. 16
February 2009. Retrieved 4 May 2010.

Bibliography[edit]

 Friedman, Norman (1994). U.S. Submarines Since 1945: An Illustrated


Design History. Annapolis, Maryland: United States Naval
Institute. ISBN 1-55750-260-9.
 Gardiner, Robert; Chumbley, Stephen (1995). Conway's All the World's
Fighting Ships 1947-1995. London: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 1-
55750-132-7.
 Miller, David; Jordan, John: Moderne Unterseeboote. Stocker Schmid
AG, Zürich 1987, 1999 (2. Auflage). ISBN 3-7276-7088-6.
 Polmar, Norman; Noot, Jurrien: Submarines of the Russian and Soviet
Navies, 1718-1990. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, 1991. ISBN 0-
87021-570-1.
 Polmar, Norman; Moore, K. J. (2004). Cold War Submarines: The
Design and Construction of U.S. and Soviet Submarines, 1945-2001.
Dulles, Virginia: Potomac Books. ISBN 978-1-57488-594-1.
 Polmar, Norman (1981). The American Submarine. Annapolis: Nautical
and Aviation Publishing. pp. 123–136. ISBN 0-933852-14-2.

External links[edit]

Wikimedia
Commons has
media related
to Ballistic
missile
submarines.

 Video showing various SSBNs in action.

[hide]
v
t
e
SSBN classes in service

Type 092 (Xia)


People's Liberation Army Navy
Type 094 (Jin)

French Navy Triomphant

Indian Navy Arihant

Delta III
Typhoon
Russian Navy
Delta IV
Borei

Royal Navy Vanguard

United States Navy Ohio


Categories:
 Ballistic missile submarines
Navigation menu

 Not logged in
 Talk
 Contributions
 Create account
 Log in
 Article
 Talk
 Read
 Edit
 View history
Search
Go

 Main page
 Contents
 Featured content
 Current events
 Random article
 Donate to Wikipedia
 Wikipedia store
Interaction
 Help
 About Wikipedia
 Community portal
 Recent changes
 Contact page
Tools
 What links here
 Related changes
 Upload file
 Special pages
 Permanent link
 Page information
 Wikidata item
 Cite this page
Print/export
 Create a book
 Download as PDF
 Printable version
In other projects
 Wikimedia Commons
Languages
 ‫اﻟﻌرﺑﯾﺔ‬
 Български
 Català
 Deutsch
 Ελληνικά
 Español
 Français
 한국어
 Italiano
 ‫עברית‬
 Bahasa Melayu
 Occitan
 Polski
 Português
 Русский
 Türkçe
 中文
Edit links
 This page was last modified on 29 October 2016, at 12:45.
 Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to
the Terms of Use andPrivacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark
of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

 Privacy policy

 About Wikipedia

 Disclaimers

 Contact Wikipedia

 Developers

 Cookie statement

 Mobile view