You are on page 1of 2

Cabilan- ejectment case

3. Plaintiffs are the true, absolute and registered owner[s] of a parcel of land, situated at
Dayao, Roxas City and covered by and described in Transfer Certificate of Title No. 18397 issued to the
plaintiffs by the Register of Deeds for Roxas City as evidenced by a xerox copy thereof which is hereto
attached as Annex A.

4. Sometime in 1991, without the consent and authority of the plaintiffs, defendant took full
control and possession of the subject property, developed the same and use[d] it for commercial


7. Plaintiffs have allowed the defendant for several years, to make use of the land without any
contractual or legal basis.Hence, defendants possession of the subject property is only by tolerance.

8. But [plaintiffs] patience has come to its limits. Hence, sometime in the last quarter of 2002,
plaintiffs made several demands upon said defendant to settle and/or pay rentals for the use of the


10. Notwithstanding receipt of the demand letters, defendant failed and refused, as it continues
to fail and refuse to pay reasonable monthly rentals for the use and occupancy of the land, and to
vacate the subject premises despite the lapse of the fifteen-day period specified in the said demand
letters. Consequently, defendant is unlawfully withholding possession of the subject property from the
plaintiffs, who are the owners thereof.[7]

Possession can be acquired by juridical acts. These are acts to which the law gives the force of
acts of possession. Examples of these are donations, succession, execution and registration of public
instruments, inscription of possessory information titles and the like.33 The reason for this exceptional
rule is that possession in the eyes of the law does not mean that a man has to have his feet on every
square meter of ground before it can be said that he is in possession.34 It is sufficient that petitioner was
able to subject the property to the action of his will.35 Here, respondent failed to show that he falls
under any of these circumstances. He could not even say that the subject property was leased to him
except that he promised that he would vacate it if petitioner would be able to show the boundaries of
the titled lot

Moreover, his claim of possession is coupled with tax declarations. While tax declarations are
not conclusive proof of possession of a parcel of land, they are good indicia of possession in the concept
of an owner, for no one in his right mind would be paying taxes for a property that is not in his actual or
constructive possession.