You are on page 1of 28

Journal of Documentation

Article information:
To cite this document:
SCIENCES", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 49 Issue: 4, pp.356-369,
Permanent link to this document:
Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT)

Downloaded on: 22 May 2018, At: 12:46 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.
To copy this document:
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 1829 times since 2006*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
of Documentation, Vol. 45 Iss 3 pp. 171-212 <a href="">https://</a>
Vol. 49 Iss 4 pp. 339-355 <a href="">

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-
srm:446033 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald
for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission
guidelines are available for all. Please visit for more information.
About Emerald
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well
as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for
digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT)

samples. Sheffield SI 4DP The information seeking patterns of a group of research physicists and research chemists were analysed and the key features of those patterns identified. The aim was to use a similar methodology to that employed in a previous study of the information seeking activities of a group of social scientists and to effect a comparison between the information seeking patterns of the scientists and the social scientists. DEBORAH COX and KATHERINE HALL Department of Information Studies University of Sheffield. Each study stands in Journal of Documentation. pp. no. The results were then compared with the findings of the previous study of the social scientists to try and identify similarities and differences between the two groups. the extent to which developments in electronic communication have had any impact on the information or com- munication patterns of the scientists and social scientists is considered. The methodology adopted for the interviews and analysis was qualitative and based on the grounded theory approach. there has been far less in the way of comparison of the information seeking activities of these two groups and only a small number of studies have addressed this issue [2-6-. 356-369 356 . A COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF RESEARCHERS IN THE PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DAVID ELLIS. objectives and methods that genuine comparison of the results is virtually impossible. Part of the reason for the paucity of comparative studies of the two groups may be that the various studies of information seeking behaviour differ so widely in aims. vol. 211 Portobello. the extent of usage of a source and the research stage at which a strategy may be employed were identified. a large number of studies have been carried out on various aspects of the information seeking behaviour of scientists and this literature has been extensively reviewed. Finally. Nonetheless. However. There is also a considerable literature on the information seeking behaviour of social scientists which also has been comprehensively reviewed. 4. fundamental differences in information seeking behaviour could not be determined. December 1993. INTRODUCTION THE STUDY OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOUR of scientists can be dated back to the late 1940s [1-. scales and definitions used by the studies. Regent Court. methodologies. Certain minor variations concerned with awareness levels of facilities. As Skelton noted: The literature of science user studies is composed of a large body of data that cannot be correlated. The Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) information seeking patterns were derived from interviews with physicists at Manchester University and chemists at the University of Sheffield. Since that time. due to differing objectives. 49.

More useful would be detailed case studies of information use in specific organisations or specific professions. The analysis of the results of the interviews employed the constant comparative method of analysis outlined by Glaser and Strauss [9]. by employing the grounded theory approach [9] in the study of the information seeking activities of the two groups. On a small scale it was hoped to demonstrate that it is possible to apply a method of investigation in user studies which can be employed to obtain Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) comparable results across a range of different subject groups and which does connect with a well established approach to theoretical model building in the social sciences. and secondly. many of the studies display a rather shallow conceptualisation as Mole [7] commented in his review of Slater's [8] study of the information needs of social scientists: [The study] lacks any explicit theoretical framework which might guide the research or enable one to interpret the findings in a meaningful fashion. The interviews adopted the interview guide approach [15] employing an interview guide based on that used by Ellis. December 1993 INFORMATION SEEKING isolation. p. Further smaller samples drew upon physicists in the low temperature group and the nuclear physics group.with the exception of the last one interviewed who was a theoretician in astronomy. 139]. All of the researchers were experimentalists . The inclusion of a theoretician was considered relevant to ensure that a possible difference between experimentalist and theoretician was not completely excluded. especially if it showed awareness not only of social science methods (including textual analysis) but of social science theories [7. this consideration only emerged as the project progressed and it was not possible in the time frame of the project to explore this more fully. The interviews themselves lasted forty-five minutes to an hour. Firstly. Furthermore. The objective was to derive behavioural models of the information seeking patterns of academic physicists [10] and academic chemists [11] employing a method similar to that used by Ellis [12-14] in deriving a behavioural model of the information seeking patterns of academic social scientists. this was done by studying the information seeking patterns of scientists employing the same approach and methodology as that used in an investigation of the information seeking patterns of social scientists. p. with no obvious links that enable it to be compared with other studies [6. Initial contact was made with the laser group at Manchester University and respondents were drawn from the subject area of atomic. molecular and polymer physics which incorporated the majority of the sample. 40]. The main aim of the research described here was to attempt to rectify these defects. The sample of physicists was drawn from the Manchester University and University of Manchester Institute for Science and Technology (UMIST) Physics Departments. Information on the information seeking activities of the scientists was collected by means of personal interviews with eighteen physicists and fourteen chemists. 357 .

as the principal focus of this Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) project was the information seeking behaviour of the physicists. 358 . Maintaining awareness explores the activity of keeping up-to-date in the researcher's own area and in the field as a whole. six post-doctoral researchers. while all eight of the other physicists had over four years' research experience. The sample of academic chemists was selected from the Department of Chemistry at the University of Sheffield. Five chemists declined to be later transpired that he had retired. This large group allowed for the comparison of emergent data from the members of other groups within the field. maintaining awareness. four on the grounds of pressure of work and one on the grounds of his semi-retired status. and one third year. In terms of teaching experience three of the sample were lecturers and seven were postgraduate teachers. These subsumed concepts were treated as sub-patterns of the core categories. inorganic. physical and theoretical chemistry (Appendix 2). and the head of the laser group. Source prioritisation refers to the physicists' views of the importance of the various sources available. However. selected from the Departmental staff list were contacted and invited to take part in the study. five second year. The sample was made up of ten full-time PhD research students . chasing. The small size of the sample means that it is not possible to make meaningful comparisons between the information seeking behaviour in the various branches of chemistry. Of the twenty chemists contacted fourteen interviews were arranged. Finally. Chasing covers the activities engaged in when following up citation links between material and identifies the criteria of selection employed for both backward and forward chasing. The candidates were selected from the four branches of chemistry represented at Sheffield: organic. JOURNAL O F DOCUMENTATION vol. locating encompasses the activities engaged in when actually finding the information. The sampling aimed to ensure variation in substantive topic within the field (Appendix 1) and to include researchers with different levels of experience. Other concepts which were identified in the initial analysis were absorbed into the core categories as the analysis proceeded. with one subject having twenty five years' experience in research. In terms of research experience just over half of the sample were full-time PhD research students. In all five core categories were derived to explain the information gathering activities of the physicists: initial familiarisation. source prioritisation. Initial familiarisation encompasses activities undertaken in the earliest stages of the information seeking process.four first year. and locating. 4 The first group to be interviewed were all members of the atomic. An initial group of twenty non- professorial academic chemists. the in- formation diffusing activity was not included in the emergent core categories. the different natures of the different branches of chemistry represented at Sheffield helped to overcome the risk of a pattern of behaviour being part-time PhD research student. However. The interviews covered both the information gathering and information diffusion activities of the researchers. 49. It proved impossible to contact one chemist . no. molecular and polymer physics group.

the first six categories. ending: activities characteristic of information seeking at the end of a topic or project. the models do not attempt to define the interactions and interrelationships between the categories or the order in which they are carried out. differentiating: using differences between sources as filters on the nature and quality of the material examined. mon- itoring. which are also found in Ellis's model. although it is possible to describe relationships between the features at a general level. Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) monitoring: maintaining awareness of developments in a field through the monitoring of particular sources. chaining: following chains of citations or other forms of referential connection between material. during the preparation of papers for publication. can be defined using the following definitions: starting: activities characteristic of the initial search for information. while the nomenclature used for the categories in the study of the chemists was standardised with that of the study of the social scientists to facilitate the easier comparison of the two models. browsing. ending. the models of the information seeking patterns of the physicists and the chemists can be used to describe any individual pattern of information seeking behaviour. browsing: semi-directed searching in an area of potential interest. The categories verifying and ending are novel and can be defined as: verifying: activities associated with checking the accuracy of information. CHEMISTS AND SOCIAL SCIENTISTS The model of the information seeking patterns of the physicists employed categories which differed in terminology from those of the original study of the social scientists. differentiating. Therefore. extracting: systematically working through a particular source to locate material of interest. the exact relationship of the features of the models depends upon the circumstances associated with the information seeking behaviour of a particular individual at a particular time. The nature of the relationship between the features of the models can only be described in relation to specific information seeking patterns. extracting. COMPARISON OF THE INFORMATION SEEKING PATTERNS OF THE PHYSICISTS. December 1993 INFORMATION SEEKING Eight categories seemed sufficient to describe the information seeking activities of the chemists: starting. In the comparison of the information seeking patterns of the physicists. However. Since the nomenclature and definition of the categories were standardised with those of Ellis. As with Ellis's model of the information seeking patterns of the social scientists. for example. chemists and social scientists 359 . verifying. chaining.

Starting The core category of initial familiarisation. Backward chaining. with the physicists as with the social scientists. as the terms employed in the models may differ while the underlying pattern of activities is the same. 49. in the main. the chemists seemed. All of the physicists interviewed had employed personal contact as a starting point for approaching a new topic. The physicists. displayed a basic similarity with Ellis's category of starting. Although there seemed to be variations between the physicists and the social scientists in terms of the level of awareness of computer based information services and opinion of the utility of the output. JOURNAL O F DOCUMENTATION vol. for the most part initial familiarisation or starting behaviour was similar for the two groups. no. similar and. reviews or review type material. to make more use of secondary services when starting than the social scientists.were identical to those used by the social scientists. and secondary services . Chaining The second generic characteristic identified by Ellis as a key feature of the information seeking patterns of the social scientists was that of chaining - following citation connections between material. were often already aware of key references or key people in a new area and their natural tendency was to begin with material with which they were already familiar. on the whole. in consequence. However. a direct close comparison between the two can be made. Ellis described starting as encompassing activities characteristic of the initial search for information. and the use of formal literature searching tools appeared to be higher amongst the physicists.which were derived. while the same resources were used. This activity was also recognised as a feature of the information seeking activities of the physicists and was given a similar label . All the physicists interviewed stated that they followed up 360 .chasing. The study of the physicists employed the category initial familiarisation to refer to the starting points adopted when the researcher begins seeking information for a new or unfamiliar project. therefore. and while both groups seemed to rely equally heavily on starter references. This represents a form of validity check on the empirical soundness of the models. from the study of the physicists. reviews and informal contact when starting. The definitions of Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) these two categories are. In a similar way. 4 outlined here it is intended to employ the terms for the categories used in the study of the chemists . the resources used by academic chemists for starting - starter references. informal contacts. Several of the physicists who were in the process of PhD research mentioned that they had been provided with their initial references by their supervisors and explicit reference to the provision of starter references was made as part of the role of supervision.and to cross reference the activities described to the categories employed in the study of the physicists. like the social scientists. from the study of the social scientists . was identified as the principal means employed to chase references.

forward chaining was less widely used and understood. Evidence that browsing. This type of browsing was mainly engaged in by the physicists in the initial familiarisation stage. The methods described by the chemists are similar to those mentioned by Ellis for the social scientists. The two main approaches for this mentioned by the chemists were browsing 361 . Browsing Browsing. and use of Science Citation Index was mentioned by half of the physicists. This also contrasts with the chemists. most had employed the technique of forward chaining. In the initial familiarisation process several of the physicists stated that they would start looking for information on a new topic by doing a literature search. As with the social scientists browsing was also used for current awareness.but you know roughly where and you just go and have a look'. that is. five made regular use of it. but of the physicists who were aware of the existence of citation indexes. in abstracts. and only two never used it. As with the social scientists. The aim of the literature search would be to obtain abstracts and to browse those abstracts in the hope of finding relevant papers which could then be used as a basis for chasing references. In contrast. in the sense of semi-directed or semi-structured searching in an area of potential interest. Various methods of browsing were used by the chemists. although those that did use it did not do so on a regular basis.that does break down . The physicists also used backward chaining as part of the maintaining awareness activity. but browsing was not confined solely to this stage. and the book and poster displays at conferences. and the browsing of computer abstracts was mentioned by several of the researchers. similarly for browsing the chemists relied on the related material being grouped together: as one of the chemists remarked: 'You know roughly where the subject areas are through classification . to forward chain. These included browsing in journals or Current Contents. all of whom were familiar with the existence of the Science Citation Index. Some remarked that it was Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) particularly useful in that it allowed the search to proceed in the opposite direction to Chemical Abstracts. understood in the same sense. The main difference between the physicists and the social scientists was the higher level of awareness amongst the physicists of the existence of the Science Citation Index. half used it occasionally. Most of the social scientists were unaware of the existence of citation indexes. only a minority of the physicists did not know what a citation index was. compared to that of the social scientists of the Social Science Citation Index. was an activity which most of the social scientists had engaged in at some time. along the shelves in the library or in bookshops. December 1993 INFORMATION SEEKING references cited in material consulted. was an activity of the physicists can be drawn from several of the core categories. Ellis noted that for browsing to be effective some limits have to be placed on the area to be searched and related material should be grouped together. Browsing to maintain awareness was also mentioned in a description of scanning journals as a preferred method of keeping up-to-date and one of the physicists mentioned having an ongoing update from a computer search which he then browsed.

there is an unwritten pecking order of journals. Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) The physicists. A comparison between the activities of the physicists and the social scientists in this respect can be drawn from the category of source prioritisation. Core journals represent for the physicists. with some mentioning the degree of stringency of refereeing of a journal as being an important factor in whether they would follow up material in that journal. and the quality. Monitoring Ellis defined monitoring as the activity of maintaining awareness of developments in an area through regularly following particular sources. level or type of treatment. 362 . this did not appear to be a major feature of their information gathering activities. Several of the physicists clearly identified their section of a particular journal set. been derived from the maintaining awareness category as the definitions are considered to be similar. therefore. a means of identifying relevant material. in chemistry. with some journals being perceived as of a higher quality than others. differentiated between sources on the basis of their substantive topic. as for the social scientists. All the chemists were able to name the journals which were of particular importance in their fields. quality. level and type of source was appropriate to both groups. level and type of source. no. Similarly.the substantive topic of study. the perspective or approach adopted. which was concerned with the factors influencing the choice of source selected by the physicists. Comparative material for the physicists has. as in social science. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION vol. and language. an additional measure of credibility involved respondent confidence in the author. Ellis found that the criteria used by the social scientists for the selection of their core journals centred around three main factors . author. On the basis of this comparison between the activities of the physicists and the social scientists it seemed that the concept of differentiating between sources to filter material on the basis of quality. The credibility of quality of published material was judged in part by the journal source. Some pointed out that the list of relevant journals was not static but changed with factors such as time and editorial policy. 49. Several mentioned that they followed the work of particular authors and one used his opinion of the quality of an author quite aggressively to filter material. 4 Current Contents and browsing in bookshops to see what was new. although many of the chemists used browsing. Several chemists used the perceived quality of the source to differentiate material. The criteria used by the chemists for differentiating were: the topic of the material. However. Differentiating Ellisd e f i n e ddifferentiating as an activity which uses differences between sources as a filter on the nature and quality of the material examined. like the social scientists. especially in the way of textbooks. and they clearly identified those sources which focussed particularly on their own subject and those which regularly carried material on a topic of interest.

and printout from online searches. However. However. although. which featured amongst the social scientists' responses. newspapers and television . This comparison. As was the case with the social scientists. The physicists. others used it only occasionally. December 1993 INFORMATION SEEKING There were some differences in the principal sources used for monitoring though both groups used personal contact and journals as important sources. Two had never used it. social scientist used monographs and journals equally. newspapers and publishers' catalogues. were usually aware of the core sources and monitored a small number carefully . while some of the social scientists made some use of the quality press to alert them to information. as a whole. some indicating that their use of it was reduced because it was only available on another site. a difference does emerge in relation to the monitoring of published material in that the chemists mainly monitored journals while. but for monitoring developments in the field. and television as a source of information.journals. books. were not evident in those of the physicists. they also had a more general interest in keeping up with developments in chemistry and science as a whole. The physicists preferred to employ conferences. most of the chemists mentioned only minor use of the quality press. In relation to monitoring. Another difference was that. For both groups informal contacts were identified as an important source for keeping up to date. Current Contents. as with the social scientists. use of Current Contents was not found to be a regular part of the monitoring activities of most of the chemists. like the social scientists. These findings agree well with previous work by Skelton [6] who found that while scientists tended to rely on journals. taken as a the case of the physicists these were mainly journals. One chemist made use of the Bi-weekly List of Papers on Radiation Chemistry and Photochemistry produced by the University of Notre Dame rather than 363 . therefore. particularly The Independent. Standard texts and introductory textbooks were employed by a majority of the physicists in the initial familiarisation process. the social scientists monitored journals and books approximately equally. magazines and computer search updates. Current Contents provides an alternative to scanning the journals them- selves and might be expected to be particularly useful for journals not available locally. revealed some differences between the social scientists and the physicists in the principal sources used to keep up to date but not in the overall nature and form of the activity. were considered too out of date. abstracts. Books Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) which were mentioned for maintaining awareness by the social scientists did not feature in the physicists' responses. and that for only general information on chemistry and science as a whole. the chemists were principally interested in keeping up to date in their own topics and fields.similar sources to those monitored by the social scientists. the physicists made no mention of the use of books for maintaining awareness. Similarly. The chemists monitored various published sources . books. Unlike the social scientists. only a minority of the physicists had a wide ranging approach and monitored a large number of sources. conference proceedings.

Errors in numerical data were the most commonly cited . Extracting as a focussed behaviour of going through a particular source and selectively identifying material from that source only really Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) occurred at the initial familiarisation stage. or. Extracting Evidence for the activity of extracting amongst the physicists interviewed was minimal. no. Large scale retrospective searching did not seem to be a characteristic of the information seeking activities of the physicists except for the retrospective searching at the initial familiarisation stage. The major use seemed to be for writing review articles. however. occurring in their information. abstracts or bibliographies and computer databases. Extracting was not found to be a particularly significant activity for the chemists. None of the chemists used Chemical Abstracts for monitoring. most of the chemists indicated that they were aware of the possibility of errors. collections of indexes. Several chemists indicated that they found it difficult to maintain regular monitoring of journals but that writing review articles forced them to go through the literature bringing themselves up to date. This involved working through a variety of sources to identify material in those sources. For one chemist extracting to write an annual review had almost completely replaced monitoring. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION vol. 4 Current Contents or other secondary services. The sources used by the chemists for extracting were principally journals and abstracts. In contrast. Verifying Verifying is a category of behaviour which was not identified as a discrete category in Ellis's study. particularly typographical errors. possibly. as once the physicist is familiar with the work retrospective searching is an activity which rarely occurs. 49. The circumstances under which it might were falling behind in the monitoring of a chosen journal. series of monographs. for example in citations. These included working through sets ofjournals. New Scientist and Nature. for gaining a broader information or knowledge base than is necessary for the task or project in hand. as with the social scientists and physicists it was mentioned as a means of updating if monitoring had lapsed.where it was perceived as being valuable was for monitoring journals to which the library had cancelled subscriptions. The concept of the physicist searching an archive for new material once immersed in a project did not really arise. Although similar activities were mentioned by some social scientists it was a very minor part of those activities and would have been subsumed under chaining. In addition to monitoring journals relevant to their topics many chemists mentioned reading general journals for general scientific information. nuclear 364 . Journals mentioned as suitable for this included Chemistry in Britain. Another secondary source used occasionally in this role by one chemist was Dissertation Abstracts. There were mixed opinions on the usefulness of Current Contents .although other errors. some did make use of the Chemical Abstracts Selects relevant to their area in this role. However.

However. One of these two indicated that he would go to the literature as necessary during the lifetime of the project. did not return to the literature until the completion of the work. In both these cases information gathering at the start of the project was minimal. one chemist did a spot check on everything. Although the extent of usage of a source and the stage at which a particular characteristic may be employed may differ. The main difference between the models of the information seeking patterns of the chemists and the social scientists is the existence of two extra categories of behaviour . Some social scientists did report similar activities but these were treated as a sub-aspect of chaining. in that respect. in particular. Two chemists indicated that they performed major literature searching at the end of a project.particularly in relation to starting. verifying was used regularly by a majority of the chemists interviewed. Most of the chemists did their major information gathering at the start of or during the lifetime of a project. although some social scientists did report similar activities which were subsumed under the categories of starting and chaining. the 365 . Several indicated that they either did not check their information or only checked obvious errors. and. the other. Overall. however. however. although they both used monitoring during the lifetime of the project. in textbooks or reviews. another did a spot check on new textbooks. Of the two. Ending Another activity which was not identified as a discrete category in Ellis's study was that of ending. December 1993 INFORMATION SEEKING magnetic resonance (NMR) assignments and equations were also mentioned. Some attempted to verify all their information. while one stressed verifying in- formation from sources he perceived to be unreliable. As only two of the chemists made significant use of ending this can be seen as a rather minor category.verifying and ending . for example. The groups undertake similar activities and the sources employed are also similar. that of starting. the characteristics of the information seeking patterns of the physicists and the social scientists are fundamentally the same. if possible. and in the case of the social scientists similar activities were subsumed under other categories. CONCLUSION The comparison of the information seeking patterns of the physicists and the social scientists shows no overriding differences between the two groups. although again similar activities were mentioned by some social scientists . Both were aware of dangers with this type of approach in finding material at the end which would have led them to modify the work they had carried out or in finding that the work had already been undertaken. several mentioned returning to the literature at the writing Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) up stage when they needed to discuss their work in the light of other published work. as well as checking obvious errors and material from sources he regarded as unreliable. seems to indicate a generic difference.which were not identified as discrete categories for the social scientists.

and the perceptions of the different values of books. in the 366 . at least in the UK. Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) The comments on the value of secondary services such as abstracts and indexes are almost so. both in terms of the information seeking activities reported and and the researchers' perceptions of those activities. The studies reveal a remarkable degree of homogeneity between the information seeking patterns of the physicists. no. the impact on the scientific communication of academic research. this has usually only constituted a small part of their information seeking activities. the employment of electronic communication as a complement to or substitute for the traditional forms is. The explanation for this is connected to the professional norms of academic publication by which the refereeing process is employed to legitimate contributions to knowledge [26-27]. [2-4] and Skelton [6] that there are not major differences in the information seeking activities of social scientists and scientists although there are differences of emphasis. although here a noticeable difference in the perception of the value of secondary services by the scientists compared to the social scientists does become apparent . as far as can be discerned. if rather more loosely. There does appear to be increasing interest in the USA in electronic communication of research results in the form of electronic conferences [22- 25] and journals but it seems unlikely that this form of communication will displace traditional conference and journal publication . The comments on personal contacts. This is strongly the case for academic journals and operates in a similar fashion. It is interesting to note that neither are there major differences in the perceptions of those activities between the three groups. 49. has remained negligible.particularly in relation to sources such as Chemical Abstracts. journals and conferences are virtually interchangeable between the physicists. the chemists and the social scientists. chemists and the social scientists. chaining. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION vol. in particular those of Richardson [18] and Van Halm [19]) and despite the technical feasibility of this form of communication as demonstrated in projects such as BLEND [20] and Quartet [21]. virtually non-existent. reviews. While some researchers have employed electronic means of identifying references. In relation to the communication of research. It is also interesting to note the relatively minor impact which developments in information technology have had on the information seeking and communication activities of the three groups. The findings confirm the broad conclusions of previous studies by Garvey et al. 4 differences between the information seeking activities of the chemists and social scientists seemed more a difference of emphasis than of a fundamental difference in behaviour. This confirms the observation of Meadows and Buckle [16] that although the potential for electronic communication of research in the form of electronic conferences and journals has been widely discussed (see for example papers in Feeny and Merry [17]. differentiating and monitoring sources.partly because of the role of conferences in creating and maintaining personal contact but also because of the lack of formal recognition of electronic media as representing legitimate outlets for least in the near future .

New Horizons in Adult Education. In this respect it will be interesting to see whether the appearance of peer reviewed electronic journals such as EJoumal. catalytic antibodies 367 . Postmodern Culture. catalysis. non-linear optics Investigation of structure. Electronic Journal of Communication. chemistry of macrocyclic ligands and metal complexes Organometallic chemistry. particularly carbine complexes Biological organic chemistry. modelling biologically active sites using small molecules. especially metal containing liquid crystals. chirality. December 1993 INFORMATION SEEKING selection of papers for conferences. distortions in high symmetry systems and peroscites Organometallic chemistry. using nuclear magnetic resonance X-ray diffraction determination of crystal structures. especially oxide systems. nucleic acids. or Psycoloquy [28] will do anything to alter the dominance of the traditional forms of scientific publication and communication or whether these sources will simply be marginalised and be perceived as representing lower division outlets for minor league research. Journal of the International Academy of Hospitality Research.variable winds around Wolf Ray stars APPENDIX 2 Research interests of chemists Liquid crystals. new materials and their applications Bio-inorganic chemistry. drug development. especially the dynamic mechanisms of inorganic and organometallic compounds. APPENDIX 1 Research interests of physicists Laser gyroscopes Ring lasers Fibre lasers Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) All aspects of laser physics Experimental research in laser physics Molecular physics Non-linear optics Medical lasers Liquid crystal displays Liquid crystals Medical application of lasers Nuclear physics Patterns in helium 3 Convection in liquid helium and mixtures at cryogenic temperatures Low temperature physics Low temperature helium Charge transfer processes in clouds leading to thunder-storm electrification Theoretical astronomy . enzymes.

Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 1986. 1990. 1989. M. Science. 1991. 1987. MSc thesis. 14. 4 Radiation chemistry. interaction of primary metabolites with secondary metabolites Thermodynamics and surface behaviours of liquids and liquid mixtures Structure. 1989. 1971. W.D. 1970. 10. 8. Journal of Documentation. A. 38-40. 368 . 3. HALL. C.E. MOLE. Chicago: Aldine.. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION vol.K. A behavioural model of the information seeking behaviour of academic chemists at the University of Sheffield. In: GARVEY. A. Communication in the physical and social sciences. protein stability. and STRAUSS. 23. Scientists and social scientists as information users: a comparison of the results of science user studies with the investigation into information requirements of the social sciences. HURYCH. MScthesis.. W. London: Bowker-Saur. California: Sage Publications. 13. ROYAL SOCIETY. and MERRY. 138-156. B. The derivation of a behavioural model for information retrieval system design. ELLIS. social scientists and humanists in the context of online searching. A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. D. COX. D. J. Report on the Royal Society scientific information conference. ed. Database design and the generation. 170. 5. PATTON. Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 2. Boston Spa: British Library Research and Development Department. B G. 1948. LIN.L. A comparison of scientific communication behaviour of social and physical scientists.D. July 1989. 1989. 6. GARVEY. 12. 15. 7. UK. International Social Science Journal. ELLIS. 1166-1173. M. photochemistry Computer simulation and theoretical investigation of the properties of bulk fluids Biophysical chemistry. D. In: FEENEY. 4. LIN. and NELSON. 1967. M. 6. 280-299. N and NELSON. GARVEY. W. A. 1990. London: Royal Society. eds. W. 1979. SKELTON.Q. University of Sheffield. Communication in the physical and social sciences. K. Proceedings of a Conference held at the Cranfield Institute of Technology.. Communication: the essence of science. SLATER. and NELSON. Journal of Librarianship. University of Sheffield. GLASER. 1991. PhD thesis. University of Sheffield.D. 11. Information needs of social scientists. 158-165. 45. D. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research.E. After Bath: scientists. C.D. 49. 252-272. communication and utilization of information by academic social scientists. GARVEY.E.. 60) 9. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 171-212. spectra and properties of molecules Theoretician studying breakdown of normal models of molecular structure in large molecules. 5. An investigation into the information seeking behaviour and needs of a group of research physicists. (British Library Research Paper No.L. N. 12. theoretical aspects of non-linear optics REFERENCES 1. no. M. 1973. C. LIN. Information needs of social scientists: a study by desk research and interview. Information technology and the research process. N.A. 256-272. Assignation. especially organometallics Quantum chemistry. Review of: SLATER. ELLIS.. Journal of Academic Librarianship.

B. In: HILLS. eds. 45. Boston Spa: British Library. ELLIS. TUCK. Knowledge: Creation. MEADOWS. The electronic archive: scientific publishing for the 1990s. and ARCHER. The limitations to electronic communication in the research community. 260-266. 27. 1984. ed. 47-63. 1990. The refereeing process. eds. and MERRY. 1990. K. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. FEENEY. S. Information technology and the research process.. Publish or perish. Information technology and the research process. London: Bowker- Saur. HAYET. 342-344. July 1989. K. 1985. Psychological Science. In: FEENEY. 1991. PITERNICK. J. Electronic journals and sky-writing: a complementary medium for scientific communication? Current Contents. Boston Spa: British Library. Utilization. Proceedings of a Conference held at the Cranfield Institute of Technology. LOCK. July 1989. 190-191. 12. Proceedings of a Conference held at the Cranfield Institute of Technology. Project Quartet. 24. 5-8.J. GARDNER. July 1989. 18. BLEND-1: background and developments. London: Bowker-Saur. 1990. M. 28. MCKNIGHT. 406-440. December 1993 INFORMATION SEEKING 16. In: FEENEY. B. 1.. M. A difficult balance: editorial peer review in medicine. (Library and Information Research Report No. 20. W. 1991. 15. 19. 76) 22. 25. and MERRY. 45-51. S. P. Psychological Science. 1990. UK. D J. P. VAN HALM. M. RICHARDSON. and PULLINGER. 1990. K. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 1989. A. Diffusion. and WENDT. SHACKEL. UK. 26. C. A. Electronic mail and scientific communication. 1990. Loughborough: Loughborough University. London: Bowker-Saur. 1987. M. D. CARLEY. 17. 23. Attempts to find alternatives to the scientific journal: a brief review. W. HARNAD. Scholarly sky-writing and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. and MERRY. Information technology and the research process. E.. and BUCKLE. J. A preliminary study of the scientific information system in the United Kingdom. D.. K. eds. Proceedings of a Conference held at the Cranfield Institute of Technology. GARFIELD. K. 29) Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 21. 1. J . Impacts of information technology on the information flow from author to end user in the research community. (Library and Information Research Report No. UK.. (Revised version received 16 July 1993) 369 . 333-341. Soham Ely: Peter Francis Publishers. 1991.

Malaysians' Preferences and Concerns Regarding Seeking Information About Illegal Drugs. A study on the effect of digital literacy on information use behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68:1. Chirag Shah. Journal of Documentation 74:4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 8. 594-608. Sheila Pontis. 2018. Online searching behaviours of preschool teachers: a comparison of pre-service and in-service teachers’ evaluation standards and searching strategies. [Crossref] 9. 638-652. 22-35. Hesham Attalla. AlharbiAwadh. [Crossref] 11. [Crossref] 13. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68:3. David M. AlazemiHuwayah M. Information Processing & Management 53:3. Angelica De Antonio. Brigitte Mathiak. 862-879. Information-Seeking Processes as Temporal Developments: Comparison of Stage-based and Cyclic Approaches. Federico Caria. Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar. 787-797. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 68:3. 2017. Hui-Min Chien. [Crossref] 4. Younghee Noh. Guihua Li. Schubert Foo. 26-56. Journal of Documentation 73:5. [Crossref] 3. 1082-1098.. LiGuihua. 2017. 628-654. Huwayah M. 577-594. A visual UML-based conceptual model of information-seeking by computer science researchers. Page. Andreas N?rnberger. Keeping up to date: An academic researcher's information journey. Qiu Ting Chie. This article has been cited by: 1. Information Processing & Management 53:4. Alazemi. Minimal Functionality for Digital Scholarly Editions 350-363. Spencer DesAutels. Reijo Savolainen. Reijo Savolainen. [Crossref] 14. Dominic Stange. [Crossref] 16. 2017. [Crossref] 10. [Crossref] 15. Rebekah Willson. Stephen Downie. Awadh Alharbi. Wei Jeng. The impact of mentoring and pedagogy on mitigation of library stress of undergraduate students. 2017. 2018. 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 2. Dagmar Kern. J. Professional Collaborative Information Seeking: Towards Traceable Search and Creative Sensemaking 1-25. [Crossref] Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 6. “Systemic Managerial Constraints”. Daqing He. Kevin R. 2018. Evaluating the Usefulness of Visual Features for Supporting Document Triage 446-458. . WuLonglong. 2017. Natalie Pang. Weigl. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 49:1. Maria Lusky. Ann Blandford. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69:6. 2017. Using author-specified keywords in building an initial reading list of research papers in scientific paper retrieval and recommender systems. Peter Organisciak. 2017. Frontiers in Public Health 6. 963-988. Cristian Moral. WillsonRebekah. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 1. [Crossref] 17. Dirk Wacker. New service system as an information- seeking context. Xavier Ferre. Longlong Wu. Lei Li. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 7. Yu-Jung Chen. David Neal. Elke Greifeneder. Information Seeking 13-27. Contributions to conceptual growth: The elaboration of Ellis's model for information-seeking behavior. Gregory Bonn. [Crossref] 5. 2017. Chia-Pin Kao. Cai Lian Tam. Information exchange on an academic social networking site: A multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A. Library Review 66:8/9. [Crossref] . Information-Seeking in Large-Scale Digital Libraries: Strategies for Scholarly Workset Creation 1-4. [Crossref] 12. Michael Kotzyba.

. [Crossref] Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 23. IjabMohamad Taha. Reijo Savolainen. José Mauro Matheus Loureiro. Rachel D. Andreas Nürnberger. . Usability evaluation with tasks characterized by the information search process. Library & Information Science Research 38:4. Not reinventing the “Reel:” Adaptation and evaluation of an existing model for digital video information seeking. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía. Models of Information Behavior 141-175. [Crossref] 40. Tatiana Gossen. Azah Anir Norman. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 27. [Crossref] 31. Motivations. The Concept of Information 55-78. Williams. 10-17. . Modeling Online Health Information- Seeking Behavior in China: The Roles of Source Characteristics. NormanAzah Anir. 643-666. Sri Devi Ravana. Research Design. . Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 9:1. Dan Albertson. Mohamad Taha Ijab. Sarah Bukhari. Shujin Cao. Tinghua Gu. [Crossref] 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] . Role of social media in information-seeking behaviour of international students. and Internet Self-Efficacy. 2016. and Use 79-96. Sri Devi Ravana. 1105-1114. Library Review 64:8/9. 1-115. Sarah Bukhari. 2016. HamidSuraya. [Crossref] 21. Stephann Makri. RavanaSri Devi. Methodology. MaCuichang. 648-673. Journal of Documentation 72:4. The History and Focus of Information Behavior Research 41-51. . Virgínia Bentes Pinto. Johnston. Weidan Cao. . . [Crossref] 32. [Crossref] 24. Merging the models of information seeking behaviour to generate the generic phases 125-130. Conceptual growth in integrated models for information behaviour. Yuanxin Wang. Theories. Melissa P. Suraya Hamid. Constructing the information ground of the campus disability center. GuTinghua. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 25. Catherine Arnott Smith. [Crossref] 36. Metatheories. [Crossref] 28. and Paradigms 177-214. Information Needs. Appendix A: Glossary 367-375. Michael Kotzyba. References 389-473. Xinyao Zhang. PATIENCE EMEFA DZANDZA. Reviewing. [Crossref] 39. Aslib Journal of Information Management 68:5. [Crossref] 20. 2016. Information Behavior: An Introduction 3-18. . Bibliotecología e Información 30:70. Sebastian Stober. Model-Based Frameworks for User Adapted Information Exploration: An Overview 37-56. Reward Assessment. Kaibin Xu. Health Communication 31:9. [Crossref] 26. . 2016. [Crossref] 38. Ann Blandford. Análise de regularidades metodológicas em pesquisas brasileiras sobre comportamentos de uso e usuários da informação. [Crossref] 37. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 54:1. The Complex Nature of Information Behavior 19-39. Research by Roles and Contexts 277-347. 2016. Suraya Hamid. 572-587. . . 2015. 2016. Critiquing. Concluding 349-366. Hamilton Rodrigues Tabosa. [Crossref] 33. Related Concepts 97-137. BukhariSarah. [Crossref] 30. [Crossref] 19. [Crossref] 35. . 614-628. 249-267. CaoShujin. 2016. Information seeking behaviour of traditional leaders in the Shai Osudoku District of Ghana. 285-291. Cuichang Ma. [Crossref] 29. [Crossref] 41. and Methods 217-273. Qualitative HCI Research: Going Behind the Scenes. The Electronic Library 34:4. . 18. Dominic Furniss. 2017. DONUS WORLANYO BUADI.

[Crossref] 45. Use and Value of Sources. Journal of Documentation 71:4. Rafiqa Ameziane. 292-313. Cole. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 33:1. Libellarium: journal for the research of writing. Human multiple information task behavior on the web. Chirag Shah. Studying PubMed usages in the field for complex problem solving: Implications for tool design. Kapseon Kim. Minsoo Park. Andrew K. Keeping up with the law: investigating lawyers’ monitoring behaviour. 667-690. 2015. Polona Vilar. Michael Kotzyba. Procedia . 101-114. 118-135. Hamilton Rodrigues Tabosa. [Crossref] 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 57. [Crossref] 56. 2015. Ji-Hong Park. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] . User Activity Patterns During Information Search. Alison J. [Crossref] 51. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 44:3. Jean Song. 125-152. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management 14:02. New Library World 115:7/8. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 46:1.Social and Behavioral Sciences 147. 45-55. Jon Pearce. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64:5. books. Shenton. Chathra Hendahewa. [Crossref] 49. Andreas Nürnberger. 169-193. Stephann Makri. 2013. 545-566. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía. Dorothy Williams. [Crossref] 46. Simon Attfield. Information Systems 38:2. 2015. Jiyoung Shim. 2013. References 237-264. Scholarly uses of TV content: bibliometric and content analysis of the information use environment. D. practice and beliefs. Belkin. Peggy Alexopoulou. Jennifer Steiner Tonks. Academic libraries and open access strategies 147-211. Fan Meng. 1550002. C. A New Integrated Model for Multitasking during Web Searching. Pickard. Virginia Bentes Pinto. Health and Technology 5:1. 3-20. Nicholas J. Dominic Stange. 2013. Bedford. [Crossref] 44. [Crossref] 47. [Crossref] 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF] 53. Shanton Chang. Access. Increasing Sense of Self-Control over Pregnancy: Information Seeking Patterns of Pregnant Women's. Professional Collaborative Information Seeking: On Traceability and Creative Sensemaking 1-16. Andrew Johnson. Building on models of information behaviour: linking information seeking and communication. 2013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 43. Ji-Hyun Lee. 2015. 2015. 42. Bibliotecología e Información 29:65. Journal of Documentation 69:4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 48. 16-25. 17. Michael J. Sean Burns. Journal of Documentation 69:2. 1-39. . Richmond Davies. Aslib Journal of Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) Information Management 67:2. Barbara Mirel. Análise dos modelos de comportamento de busca e uso de informação nas dissertações e teses dos PPGCI: Uma proposta de ampliação ao modelo de Ellis. Toward a user-oriented recommendation system for real estate websites. 2014. Lyn Robinson. Andrew Robson. The Knowledge Management Information Landscape — Awareness. 2014. [Crossref] 59. Sun-Joong Kim. Weijian Xuan. Mark Hepworth. [Crossref] 54. Anne Morris. Young people and the evaluation of information on the World Wide Web: Principles. 2015. 2015. 231-243. Xiaofang Yuan. Towards a conceptual framework for provider information behaviour. [Crossref] 55. 2013. Information behaviour of scholars. Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang. and cultural heritage institutions 7:1. Stephanie Ellis. Yoon-Hyun Kim. Karin Verspoor. Conceptualising health information seeking behaviours and exploratory search: result of a qualitative study. Denise A. 2014. 874-892.

143-167. Journal of Information Science 39:1. 2013. Evolving Tools for Information Literacy from Models of Information Behavior. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science 23:1. Cox. Understanding Utilization of E-Journals through Usage Reports from Aggregators in a Distance Education University. 461-465. Robert Capra. 228-242. Information seeking behaviour of astronomy/ astrophysics scientists. K. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 50:1. [Crossref] 70. Günter Krampen. 2012. Wildemuth. 2012. [Crossref] 73. Sanda Erdelez. Library Review 61:2. Daniel A. [Crossref] 63. Ann Blandford. 2012. 2013. Hemant Kumar Sahu. Elaine G. Anwar Alhenshiri. 2011. 1-5. Evaluating the Information Behaviour methods: Formative evaluations of two methods for assessing the . Stephann Makri. Sheila Webber. Journal of Information Management 43:4. [Crossref] 75. [Crossref] 62. Hay-Gibson. The Relationship between Users Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) Cognitive Style and Information Seeking Behavior among Postgraduate Engineering Students. Katriina Byström. Gabriel Schui. Kourosh Nemati. Information Use Behaviors of Professors in Design Field. 299-306. What difference does a theoretical lens make in conducting a study of human information interactions? Panel presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the association for information science & technology (ASIS&T). Hoda Badesh. 92-109. Jungsun Yoon. Hye-Ju Jung. [Crossref] 71. Aslib Proceedings 65:2. 114-138. Jeevan. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 37:4. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 61. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação 16:4. Toms. J. New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship 18:1. [Crossref] 66. 22-42. Reboussin. Andrew K. Manorama Tripathi*. [Crossref] 76. Clemens Fell. vii-xxxiv. [Crossref] 74. Hye-Lyun Jung. User-Oriented Information Retrieval 76-85. Roliana Ibrahim. Blended information behaviour in Second Life. 2011. 299-316. 2011. Andrew K. 109-142. Psychologists’ research activities and professional information-seeking behaviour: Empirical analyses with reference to the theory of the Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. V. Nina Evans. Simon Attfield. Academic Users' Information Searching on Research Topics: Characteristics of Research Tasks and Search Strategies. 27-46. The effect of user search behaviour on web information gathering tasks 61-66. Myeong-Hee Lee. Claire Warwick. Journal of Information Science 37:4. Study on the Science & Technology Information Service Needs Corresponding to the Scientists and Engineers Group Characteristics. Shenton. Information behaviour meta‐models. Shenton. [Crossref] 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 69. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 24:1. [Crossref] 72. 2012. Anna L. Information Literacy: 21st Century Library Research Methods for African Studies. 2012. Sunil Kumar. 2011. 85-100. 2012. 439-450. 60. Mary Cavanagh. [Crossref] 67. 2013. Influence of training and stage of search on gaze behavior in a library catalog faceted search interface. Africa Bibliography 2010. Dirlene Santos Barros. Hay‐Gibson. 2011. Jia Tina Du. 2012. [Crossref] 64. Surya Nath Singh. Estudo de usuários no arquivo público do estado do Maranhão (APEM): analisando as estratégias metacognitivas no processo de busca de informação. Barbara M. Naomi V. Dulce Amélia de Brito Neves. Bill Kules. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63:1. Procedia . Jannica Heinström. Naomi V. [Crossref] 65.Social and Behavioral Sciences 56. Maryam Salarian.

Simon Attfield. Library Review 59:7. 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 89. Kyung-Jae Bae. International Information & Library Review 43:2. [Crossref] . Luciana Ferreira da Costa. Laila Marouf. 228-234. Jiajie Zhang. Information Processing & Management 46:6. Francisca Arruda Ramalho. [Crossref] 85. Sudhir Mudur. Sofia Zapounidou. Journal of Medical Systems 35:2. [Crossref] 91. Anwar. Anna L. Nutefall. Library Review 59:7. 2010. [Crossref] 90. Sei-Ching Joanna Sin. 169-177. [Crossref] 80. [Crossref] 78. 522-531. Simon Attfield. Phyllis Mentzell Ryder. 2011. Information‐seeking behavior of the social sciences faculty at Kuwait University. Religare: comportamento informacional à luz do modelo de Ellis. This is what I’m doing and why: Methodological reflections on a naturalistic think-aloud study of interactive information behaviour. Conceptual misfits in e‐mail‐based current‐awareness interaction. Jennifer E. 455-482. Journal of Library Administration 50:7-8. Information for inspiration: Understanding architects' information seeking and use behaviors to inform design. 92-117. 2010. Claire Warwick. Sheeja. Stephann Makri. Afrodite Malliari. The Serendipitous Research Process. 79-91. 2010. Information Processing & Management 47:3. 336-348. Transinformação 22:2. Stephann Makri. 2010. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies 69:7-8. The International Information & Library Review 43:2. Francisca Arruda Ramalho. Mumtaz A. Exploring the information seeking behavior of Greek graduate students: A case study set in the University of Macedonia. Afrodite Malliari. 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 88. 532-547. Luciana Ferreira da Costa. N. Exploring the information seeking behavior of Greek graduate students: A case study set in the University of Macedonia. Journal of Documentation 67:1. Yang Gong. Science vs social science. 2010. The Analysis of the Differences of Information Needs and Usages among Academic Users in the Field of Science and Technology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 36:3. Elaheh Mozaffari. Cox. 157-176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF] 83. Stella Korobili. Olugbade Oladokun. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 82. 883-898. Toward A Human-Centered Hyperlipidemia Management System: The Interaction between Internal and External Information on Relational Data Search. Chapter 8 Towards Agency–Structure Integration: A Person-in- Environment (PIE) Framework for Modelling Individual-Level Information Behaviours and Outcomes 181-209. 2010. Sofia Zapounidou. functionality and usability of electronic information resources. [Crossref] 92. 2010. 33-55. Ann Blandford. [Crossref] Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 81. 2010. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science 44:2. Stella Korobili. 2011. Stephann Makri. Social and interactional practices for disseminating current awareness information in an organisational setting. [Crossref] 79. 1745-1770. A Classification Scheme for Characterizing Visual Mining 46-54. Ann Blandford. 79-91. 632-645. Information Seeking Behavior of the Off-Campus Students at the University of Botswana: A Case of Two Satellite Centers. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação 15:1. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61:9.K. [Crossref] 77. 2011. [Crossref] 87. [Crossref] 84. Ann Blandford. [Crossref] 86. 2011. A usabilidade nos estudos de uso da informação: em cena usuários e sistemas interativos de informação. 169-186.

59-75. Papadopoulos. Evaluating Behavioral Change in Multigroup Collaboration for Content Publishing Over the Web. Cees A. Stephann Makri. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59:14. Charalampos Z. Synthesis Lectures on Human- Centered Informatics 3:1. Modelling Information-Seeking Behaviour Patterns of Iranian Medical School Academic Staff. 46-69. 2008. Stephann Makri. 187-196. and Services 1:1. Social Science Computer Review 27:1. Information‐seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers. 239-263. David Ellis. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 110. Scientometrics 81:1. 2010. . Zouhayr Hayati. Journal of Documentation 66:2. 2008. Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From Ellis’s model to design. 1-98. 2009. Investigating information retrieval support techniques for different information-seeking strategies. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação 14:2. White. Anna L. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 95. 444-462. [Crossref] 100. Dania Bilal. Jiajie Zhang. Interacting with Information. Resa A. Ricardo Rodrigues Barbos. Alesia Zuccala. [Crossref] 97. Maria Koukouli. Ricardo B. Journal of Library Administration 49:1-2. [Crossref] 106. White. Ágústa Pálsdóttir. George K. Guillermo Henríquez. The connection between purposive information seeking and information encountering. 2008. [Crossref] 101. Yang Gong. Xiaojun Yuan. 613-634. Patrikakis. 2009. [Crossref] 108. Timmers.W. [Crossref] 96. Developing scales for information‐seeking behaviour. Sideridis. 2008. David Gotzy. Libri 59:4. [Crossref] 98. [Crossref] 109. 2010. Connecting the dots in visual analysis 123-130. 1-99. 1555-1569. David Nicholas. Anna L. Yunshan Ye. Omar Barriga. Alica C. [Crossref] 107. Cox. Cox. Ann Blandford. Jie Lu. von Thaden. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 94. 2009. Retrieval. Jamali. Simon Attfield. 1-62. Journal of Documentation 66:1. 52-75. Internet practice and professional networks in Chilean science: Dependency or progress?. Using information behaviors to evaluate the functionality and usability of electronic resources: From Ellis's model to evaluation. Yedendra B. Social Science Literatures and Their Users 4848-4856. Shrinivasan. 224-244. 2009. [Crossref] 111. Margaret Guccione. Sonia Sarangthem. 2244-2267. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59:10. Effects of Information Displays for Hyperlipidemia 503-512. [Crossref] 99. Duque. 2009. Caroline F. 2009. Shrum. [Crossref] . Meditating differences in children's interaction with digital libraries through modeling their tasks. Alexander B. Wesley M. [Crossref] 104. Information Processing & Management 44:2. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 43:1. 2010. [Crossref] 103. Marco Antonio Carvalho Brum. Aslib Proceedings 60:5. Belkin. Distributed information behavior: A study of dynamic practice in a safety critical environment. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 46:1. 2009. Roth. The lay person and Open Access. Nicholas J. Terry L. Glas. 93. [Crossref] 105. Ann Blandford. Study Abroad Students: Designing Library Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) Services to Meet Their Needs. Hamid R. Ann Blandford. Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm. Ryen W. Comportamento de busca e uso da informação: um estudo com alunos participantes de empresas juniores. [Crossref] 102. 2010. Mozhdeh Salajegheh. 2009. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology n/a-n/a. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts. 1-19.

Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Qing Gu. [Crossref] 128.A. Sarit Barzilai. Web searchers' attributions of success and failure: an empirical study. Is information acquisition still important in the information age?. New Review of Academic Librarianship 13:1-2. How does information technology shape thinking?. Anat Zohar. Creative information seeking. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 44:1. Journal of Documentation 63:1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 123. Can two established information models explain the information behaviour of visually impaired people seeking health and social care information?. Scholarship and disciplinary practices. Ciência da Informação 35:3. 51-69. 678-693. [Crossref] 113. Sônia Elisa Caregnato. Melissa H. Carole L. 2007. [Crossref] 115. Maria E. Interactive information retrieval. 659-679. Integration of information needs and seeking 473-478. Ford. 2006. 43-91. Adams. Dihui Lu. International Journal of Electronic Business 6:2. Burke. Bath. Journal of Documentation 62:6. organizational hierarchy and information fulfilment. Al-Fedaghi. Laura F. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 42:1. John E. Aslib Proceedings 59:3. [Crossref] 117. [Crossref] 122. Bright. Thinking Skills and Creativity 1:2. 2007. Moira Bent. Cragin. Nikoi. Don Turnbull. David Mendonca. Nigel J. China and Greece. Vaughan.A. Bradley M. 44-52. 2008. 2007. [Crossref] 118. 744-761. 2008. Shu‐Shing Lee. Madden. Dervos. Hemminger. 2006. Journal of Documentation 63:5. 30-38. 2006. Advertising academia with sponsored search: an exploratory study examining the effectiveness of Google AdWords at the local and global level. Yin‐Leng Theng. 9-32. [Crossref] 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 120. RESEARCHERS AND THEIR INFORMATION NEEDS: A LITERATURE REVIEW. 2008. Andrew Large. Charles Cole. Dimitris A. 35-53. Beverley. 163-212. Isabel Merlo Crespo. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 125. Yan Zhang. Padrões de comportamento de busca e uso de informação por pesquisadores de biologia molecular e biotecnologia. Anat Zohar. Philippa Levy. Group Information Foraging in Emergency Response: An Illustration Incorporating Discrete-Event Simulation 554-561. David Miller. 2007. 2008.L. Jamshid Beheshti. 1227-1241. Education and Information Technologies 13:1. 130-145. [Crossref] . Dion Hoe‐Lian Goh. Stephanie J. Ian Ruthven. 205-221. Jo Webb. Sarit Barzilai. Sabah S. 2007. Barber. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 129. Pat Gannon-Leary. R. [Crossref] 126. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58:9. 2007. Information Needs of NGOs: a case study of NGO development workers in the northern region of Ghana. 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 121. [Crossref] 124. [Crossref] 116. [Crossref] 119. [Crossref] 114. 2007. Yang Lin. Task-based information retrieval: Structuring undergraduate history essays for better course evaluation using essay-type visualizations. C. 2008. Peiling Wang. K. Children's use of the internet for information‐seeking. Leide. Yazdan Mansourian. P. Palmer. Information Development 24:1. 112. Cultural issues. Andrew D. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 58:14. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 42:1. Samuel K. Nigel Ford. Information-seeking behaviors of academic researchers in the internet age: A user study in the United States. 1-29. Lei Wu. 2205-2225. Library Review 56:8.T. 2007.

Kerr. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43:1. Reinhard. Journal of Documentation 61:2. Bartlett. 651-664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 143. Hamid R. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56:5. 2005. 2006. [Crossref] 144. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences 5:1. Kuruppu. Computers in Human Behavior 21:3. Brenda Dervin. [Crossref] 137. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 22:5. Shu‐Shing Lee. 2005. 2006. Fast surfing. 2005. 2005. Creative information seeking Part I: a conceptual framework. 609-623. Anne Marie Gruber. Communication and information-seeking behavior of PhD students in physicists and astronomy. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 140. Christina Brage. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management 22:4. 1-15. 2005. Learning from web information seeking studies: some suggestions for LIS practitioners. Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Iwan Wopereis. Michael Shepherd. Xiangmin Zhang. [Crossref] Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 135. Web searching across languages: Preference and behavior of bilingual academic users in Korea. An empirical testing of user stereotypes of information retrieval systems. Incorporating Users into System Design Processes: Overview and a Proposed User Model. [Crossref] 147. Soo Young Rieh. Joan C. Amanda Spink. Special and Otherwise 233-269. 487-508. [Crossref] 141. Jannica Heinström. Schubert Shou‐Boon Foo. Bertil Lind. David Nicholas. Ann Lind. 2006. 2006. 266-282. [Crossref] 138. Aslib Proceedings 57:5. CarrieLynn D. 2005. 23-38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF] 134. Elaine G. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43:1. Broad exploration or precise specificity: Two basic information seeking patterns among students. Pali U. Minsoo Park. [Crossref] 132. 2005. Carolyn Watters. Hui Han. Jannica Heinström. Saskia Brand-Gruwel. 2005. Information Processing & Management 41:3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 146. 2005. 1-22. 2005. Lin Fu. Yvonne Vermetten. 130. Melanie Kellar. Journal of Documentation 61:4. [Crossref] 139. Online Information Review 29:3. 460-475. A Goal-based Classification of Web Information Tasks. Hae-young Rieh. 2005. 249-263. 20-37. The Burden of Being Special: Adding Clarity about Communicating to Researching and Serving Users. 1-18. 453-464. broad scanning and deep diving. The Electronic Library 24:1. 2006. 2006. Library & Information Science Research 27:2. 228-247. Agneta Lantz. [Crossref] . Yin‐Leng Theng. 235-254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 133. Understanding the Information Needs of Academic Scholars in Agricultural and Biological Sciences. 1440-1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 142. Zack Y. [Crossref] 131. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 32:6. 548-554. 469-482. Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis: An integrated information behavior and task analysis approach. The practice of information system development and use: a dialectical approach. Information and non‐information multitasking interplay. Collaborative querying using the Query Graph Visualizer. Toms. Review of Research Trend in Models of Information Seeking Behavior. [Crossref] 136. Towards a Learning Society — Exploring the Challenge of Applied Information Literacy through Reality-Based Scenarios. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57:11. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management 22:4. Dion Hoe‐Lian Goh. Ina Fourie. Jamali. Dion Hoe‐Lian Goh. [Crossref] 145.

Donald W. Graeme Baxter. 2003. Hur‐Li Lee. Micheline Beaulieu. 247-254. 45-61. 2003. Sim.T. Callinan. Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited. 86-99. Rita Marcella. 2003. Journal of Documentation 60:2. Hanni Maula. Internet Research 13:4. broad scanners and deep divers as users of information technology . Sanna Talja. 2003. Man and Cybernetics. Library & Information Science Research 26:3. 2003. 2003. Nick Moore. 396-407. 419-436. 2004. [Crossref] 153. Part C (Applications and Reviews) 34:3. 239-248. Tibbo. Lin Fu. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research 4:1. 336-351. Schubert Shou-Boon Foo. P. 179-181. [Crossref] 166. Helen R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 156. Journal of Documentation 59:2. Jannica Heinström. Information‐seeking behaviour of undergraduate biology students. Toward Agency and Ontology for Web-Based Information Retrieval. Helen Belefant-Miller.Relating information preferences to personality traits. Information Systems Journal 13:2. 143-167. Multitasking information behavior and information task switching: an exploratory study. Joanne E. Eric Thivant. The Concept of Collection from the User’s Perspective. 267-280. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54:6. [Crossref] 155. 673-691. 2005. 183-225. Library & Information Science Research 25:4. 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 163. [Crossref] 158. Fast surfers. Wooseob Jeong. 2003. Journal of Documentation 59:6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 149. Amanda Spink. Brian Detlor. Library Review 54:2. K. 2004. 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 152. Journal of Information Science 30:5. Data collection using electronically assisted interviews in a roadshow. 113-132. [Crossref] 161. 2003. The effect of similarity measures on the quality of query clusters. A profile of faculty reading and information-use behaviors on the cusp of the electronic age. 2003. 384-400. Towards a model of learning for educational informatics. 257-269. Reasons for the use and non‐use of electronic journals and databases. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 160. 2003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 167. 67-85. 570-587. [Crossref] 151. 2003. 769-782. 2004. Lokman I. 2004.M. A Comparative Study on Models of Information Seeking Behavior. Dion Hoe-Lian Goh. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54:2. Wong. [Crossref] . [Crossref] 164. [Crossref] 154. The Library Quarterly 75:1. Unbreakable ethnic bonds: information-seeking behavior of Korean graduate Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) students in the United States. Christine Marton. 2004. Nigel Ford. Modeling cognitive processes in information seeking: From Popper to Pask. Information seeking and use behaviour for the design of financial products. [Crossref] 165. Information seeking on the Web by women in IT professions. King. Nigel Ford. Journal of Documentation 60:4. 2005. Chun Wei Choo. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55:9. Journal of Information Science 29:4. [Crossref] 162. Meho. Internet-based information systems use in organizations: an information studies perspective. 19-40. 93-119. McKenzie. Approaches to User-Based Studies in Information Seeking and Retrieval: A Sheffield Perspective. Journal of Documentation 59:1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 157. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 40:1. [Crossref] 150. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management 20:1. 2004. Information spaces and collections: Implications for organization. [Crossref] 159. Pamela J. Hur-Li Lee. A model of information practices in accounts of everyday‐life information seeking. IEEE Transactions on Systems.

Journal of Documentation 58:2. [Crossref] 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 172. Rita Marcella. New Library World 103:6. Wilson. [Abstract] [PDF] . Joe Kirby. [Crossref] 183. 45-65. Haas. [Crossref] 177. Journal of Documentation 55:3. Crystal Fulton.D. 2000. [Crossref] 174. 2001. Allen Foster. Library & Information Science Research 23:1. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53:8. Seak-Zoon Roh. King. 91-112. Aslib Proceedings 52:7. Maureen Jackson. Information Processing & Management 38:5. Strategic help in user interfaces for information retrieval. Information seeking and mediated searching. Charles Cole. Wilson. T. 53-60. Stefano Mizzaro.M. 839-849. 923-933.D. Lokman I. Fabio Venuti. 2002. Meho. [Abstract] [PDF] 181. Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behavior. 1999. 249-270. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53:5. Part 5. [Crossref] 185. Giorgio Brajnik. Burton. [Crossref] 169. Information control in the virtual office: preparing intermediaries to facilitate information exchange in the home work environment. Library & Information Science Research 23:1. Information and poverty: information-seeking channels used by African American low-income households. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] 171. 2001. [Abstract] [PDF] 182. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37:1. 209-215. 2002. Information-Seeking Behavior of Academic Meteorologists and the Role of Information Specialists. Innovations in Education & Training International 36:4. [Crossref] 184. [Crossref] 178. Information Processing & Management 35:6. H. Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users. Science & Technology Libraries 21:1-2. and Why Science Faculty Read. 649-670. R. Networked information literacy ‐ the European EDUCATE and DEDICATE projects. Effective Use of Electronic Resources. Nigel Ford. [Crossref] 175. Helen Belefant-Miller. Carlo Tasso. 2002. 2002. 168. New Review of Information Networking 6:1. How. Ethelene Whitmire. 2000. Byeong-Min Yu. Amanda Spink. Nancy Fjällbrant. User-intermediary interaction. Graham Walton. [Crossref] 179. 2002. 257-268. 883-893. Pertti Vakkari. [Crossref] Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 173. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53:11. Tim Wales. The effects of menu design on information-seeking performance and user's attitude on the World Wide Web. 2000. Information-seeking behavior and use of social science faculty studying stateless nations: a case study. Task-based information searching. 2002. Dania Bilal. Julie Hallmark. 1999. Stephanie W. [Crossref] 180. 1999. Models in information behaviour research. Amanda Spink. Nick Moore. 2003. 5-25. 2000. What. 185-210. Donald W. 320-326. Program 34:3. Nancy Fjällbrant. Craig Bartle. Exploring models of information behaviour: the ‘uncertainty’ project. David Ellis. 235-246. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53:11. 2002. Graeme Baxter. Tom Wilson. Lam. Practice makes perfect? Vets’ information seeking behaviour and information use explored. Information literacy for scientists and engineers: experiences of EDUCATE and DEDICATE. [Crossref] 176. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of information need in the context of the impact of new information and communications technologies on the communication of parliamentary information. 631-638. 343-358. Science & Technology Libraries 19:2. 2001. T. 53-64. 413-464.

[Crossref] 187. Miriam Matteson. New Review of Information Networking 4:1. B. 186. Bahaman Abu Samah. 1994. J. Jusang Bolong. Carroll. Anne Bell. 291-315. [Citation] [PDF] [PDF] 193. 384-403. 209-222. New Review of Academic Librarianship 3:1.P. 1-24. Information-Seeking Behaviour of Users in the Digital Libraries' Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa 1366-1396.An Empirical Approach 125-134. Pandala Pratap Lingam. Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh. Expert Internet Information Access. References 243-255. Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation 53:4. 69-89. IFLA Journal 23:1.M. A Methodology for the Identification of Information Needs of Users. 1996.M. [Abstract] [PDF] 191. INFORMATION SCIENCE OBSERVED: NEW MEDIA AND PRODUCTIVITY IN A GROUP OF UK PRACTITIONERS. [Abstract] [PDF] 196. Mohammed Nasser Al-Suqri. Akinade Adebowale Adewojo. Library Use Pattern of Malaysian Agricultural Scientists. [Crossref] 195. 53-70. [Crossref] 203. David Ellis. Researching Information Seeking in Digital Libraries Through Information-Seeking Models 264-287. The impact of electronic information on the academic research community. [Crossref] 202. Devendra Potnis. E. Wilson's Information-Seeking Behavior Models (1981. 1999. Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh. . Francis Jawahar Devadason. SHAHEEN MAJID. An observational method for undertaking user needs studies. Towards holistic Web-based information retrieval: an agent-based approach 39-46. MUMTAZ ALI ANWAR. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 28:1. Kwang Mong Sim. [Crossref] 190. 1996. [Crossref] 198. 1999) 94-112. Impact of information technology developments on the information handling techniques of research scientists: Implications of selected results. Chun Wei Choo. James B. Information-Seeking Behaviour of Users in the Digital Libraries' Environment in Sub-Saharan Africa 26-56. [Crossref] . Journal of Educational Computing Research 20:3. [Crossref] 205. Modelling the Information-Seeking Behaviour of Programmers . Seyedali Ahrari. ELISABETH DAVENPORT. 1997. E. [Crossref] 206. Seyedali Ahrari. Charles Oppenheim. Detlor. [Crossref] 188. Buckley. TAMARA S. Carolyn Eager. . Library & Information Science Research 21:1. [Crossref] 199. 41-51. Nigeria 238-271. 15-23. [Crossref] 194. 1997. [Crossref] 189. Ondari-Okemwa. EISENSCHITZ. 1999. 1998. Jusang Bolong. M. Researching Information Seeking in Digital Libraries through Information-Seeking Models 84-107. Ondari-Okemwa. Journal of Documentation 50:4. [Crossref] 201. Femi Titus Akande. [Crossref] 204. Information Need and Seeking Behavior of Farmers in Laduba Community of Kwara State. [Crossref] 197. Mary Davies. [Crossref] Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) 192. 1997. [Crossref] 200. 1999. The Research Habits of Graduate Students and Faculty 46-60. Working in the virtual office: Providing information and knowledge to remote workers. O'Brien. McInerney. Merete Haugan. Working the Web: an empirical model of Web use 9. Turnbull. Claire R. Libri 49:4. Contextual Factors Influencing Information Seeking Behavior of Social Scientists 37-57. D. Bahaman Abu Samah.

Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh. 207. Bahaman Abu Samah. Seyedali Ahrari. Jusang Bolong. [Crossref] 209. Les pratiques d’accès à l’information professionnelle  : le cas des chargés d’études économiques et des analystes 249-261. [Crossref] Downloaded by Rennes School of Business At 12:46 22 May 2018 (PT) . Contextual Factors Influencing Information Seeking Behavior of Social Scientists 190-210. Researching Information Seeking in Digital Libraries Through Information-Seeking Models 2157-2180. [Crossref] 208. Mohammed Nasser Al-Suqri. Eric Thivant.