Professional Documents
Culture Documents
bonjour, madame
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW how old you look, just walk into a French
café. It’s like a public referendum on your face.
When I moved to Paris in my early thirties, waiters called me “ma-
demoiselle.” It was “Bonjour, mademoiselle” when I walked into a café
and “Voilà, mademoiselle” as they set down a coffee in front of me. I sat
in many different cafés in those early years—I didn’t have an office, so
I spent my days writing in them—and everywhere I was “mademoi-
selle.” (The word technically means “unmarried woman,” but it’s come
to signify “young lady.”)
Around the time I turn forty, however, there’s a collective code
switch. Waiters start calling me “madame,” though with exaggerated
formality or a jokey wink. It’s as if “madame” is a game we’re playing.
They still sprinkle in the occasional “mademoiselle.”
Soon even these jocular “mademoiselles” cease, and my “madames”
are no longer tentative or ironic. It’s as if the waiters of Paris (they’re
mostly men) have decided en masse that I’ve exited the liminal zone
between young and middle-aged.
W hat are the forties? It’s been my custom not to grasp a decade’s
main point until it’s over, and I’ve squandered it. I spent my
twenties scrambling in vain to find a husband, when I should have
been building my career as a journalist and visiting dangerous places
before I had kids. As a result, in my early thirties I was promptly fired
from my job at a newspaper. That freed me up to spend the rest of my
thirties ruminating on grievances and lost time.
This time, I’m determined to figure out the decade while I’m still
in it. But while each new birthday brings some vertigo—you’re always
the oldest you’ve ever been—the modern forties are especially disori-
enting. They’re a decade without a narrative. They’re not just a new
number; they feel like a new atmospheric zone. When I tell a forty-
two-year-old entrepreneur that I’m researching the forties, his eyes
widen. He’s successful and articulate, but his age leaves him
speechless.
“Please,” he says, “tell me what they are.”
Obviously, the forties depend on the beholder, and on your family,
your health, your finances and your country. I’m experiencing them as
a privileged, white American woman—not exactly a beleaguered
group. I’m told that when a woman turns forty in Rwanda, she’s hence-
forth addressed as “grandma.”
With their signature blend of precision and pessimism, the French
have carved up midlife into the “crisis of the forties,” the “crisis of the
fifties” and the “noonday demon,” described by one writer as “when a
man in his fifties falls in love with the babysitter.” And yet, they have
an optimistic story about how to age, in which a person strives to be-
come free. (The French are flawed, but I’ve learned from some of their
better ideas.)
Wherever you are, forty looks old from below. I hear Americans in
their twenties describe the forties as a mythic, far-off decade of too-late,
when they’ll regret things that they haven’t done. When I tell one of my
sons that I’m writing a book about the forties, he says that he’d like to
write a short one about being nine. “It’ll say, ‘I’m nine years old. I’m so
lucky. I’m still young.’ ”
And yet for many senior citizens I meet, the forties are the decade
that they would most like to time travel back to. “How could I possibly
have thought of myself as old at forty?” asks Stanley Brandes, an an-
thropologist who wrote a book about turning forty in 1985. “I sort of
look back and think: God, how lucky I was. I see it as the beginning of
life, not the beginning of the end.”
Forty isn’t even technically middle-aged anymore. Someone who’s
now forty has a 50 percent chance of living to age ninety-five, says econ-
omist Andrew Scott, coauthor of The 100-Year Life.
But the number forty still has gravitas and symbolic resonance. Je-
sus fasted for forty days. Mohammed was forty when the archangel
Gabriel appeared to him. The Biblical flood lasted for forty days and
nights, and Moses was forty when he led the Israelites out of Egypt,
after which they famously wandered the desert for forty years. Brandes
writes that in some languages, “forty” means “a lot.”
And there is still something undeniably transitional about age forty.
You’ve only ever known yourself as a certified young person, and now
you’ve left one stage of life, but you haven’t quite entered the next. The
Frenchman Victor Hugo supposedly called forty the “old age of youth.”
While studying my face in a well-lit elevator, my daughter described this
crossroads more bluntly: “Mommy, you’re not old, but you’re definitely
not young.”
I’m starting to see that as a madame— even a newly minted one—I
am subject to new rules. When I act adorably naive now, people aren’t
charmed anymore, they’re baffled. Cluelessness no longer goes with my
face. I’m expected to wait in the correct line at airports, and to show up
on time for my appointments.
To be honest, I feel myself becoming a bit more madame on the
inside, too. Names and facts don’t just pop into my mind anymore; I
sometimes have to draw them up, like raising water from a well. And
I can no longer wing it through a day on coffee and seven hours’ sleep.
Similar complaints trickle in from my peers. At dinner with friends
my age, I notice that each of us has a sport that our doctor forbids us to
play. There’s nervous laughter when someone points out that, under
American law, we’re now old enough to claim age discrimination.
New brain research documents the downsides of the forties: on aver-
age we’re more easily distracted than younger people, we digest infor-
mation more slowly and we’re worse at remembering specific facts. (The
ability to remember names peaks, on average, in your early twenties.)
And yet, science also shows the many upsides of the forties. What
we lack in processing power we make up for in maturity, insight and
experience. We’re better than younger people at grasping the essence
of situations, and at controlling our emotions, resolving conflicts and
understanding other people. We’re more skilled at managing money
and at explaining why things happen. We’re more considerate than
younger people. And, crucially for our happiness, we’re less neurotic.
Indeed, modern neuroscience and psychology confirm what Aris-
totle said some two thousand years ago, when he described men in
their “primes” as having “neither that excess of confidence which
amounts to rashness, nor too much timidity, but the right amount of
each. They neither trust everybody nor distrust everybody, but judge
people correctly.”
I f the modern forties are confusing, it’s also because we’ve reached an
age that’s strangely lacking in milestones. Childhood and adoles-
cence are nothing but milestones: You grow taller, advance to new
grades, get your period, your driver’s license and your diploma. Then
in your twenties and thirties you romance potential partners, find jobs
and learn to support yourself. There may be promotions, babies and
weddings. The pings of adrenaline from all these carry you forward
and reassure you that you’re building an adult life.
In the forties, you might still acquire degrees, jobs, homes and
spouses, but these elicit less wonder now. The mentors, elders and par-
ents who used to rejoice in your achievements are preoccupied with
their own declines. If you have kids, you’re supposed to marvel at their
milestones. A journalist I know lamented that he’ll never again be a
prodigy at anything. (Someone younger than both of us had just been
nominated to the US Supreme Court.)
“Even five years ago, people I met would be like, ‘Wow you’re the