Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Table 2-1: Oklahoma Secondary Treatment Standards

Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide
Table 2-1: Oklahoma Secondary Treatment Standards 1
Frequency Perennial Streams Discharge Intermittent Streams or Lake Discharge Lagoons Discharge
Monthly Average 30 mg/L BOD5 2 or 25 mg/L CBOD5 3 20 mg/L BOD5 or 18 mg/L CBOD5 30 mg/L BOD5 or 25 mg/L CBOD5
Weekly Average 45 mg/L BOD5 or 40 mg/L CBOD5 30 mg/L BOD5 or 25 mg/L CBOD5 45 mg/L BOD5 or 40 mg/L CBOD5
% removal BOD5 or CBOD5 cannot be % removal BOD5 or CBOD5 cannot be % removal BOD5 or CBOD5
Monthly Average
less than 85% less than 85% cannot be less than 65%
Monthly Average 30 mg/L TSS 4 30 mg/L TSS 90 mg/L TSS
Weekly Average 45 mg/L TSS 45 mg/L TSS
Monthly Average % removal TSS cannot be less than 85% % removal TSS cannot be less than 85%
pH 6.5 – 9.0 s.u. 5 6.5 – 9.0 s.u. 6.5 – 9.0 s.u.
1
This table summarizes current treatment standards as of 9/12/2014; check with ODEQ for updates or more information.
2
BOD5 = 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand
3
CBOD5 = 5-day Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand
4
TSS = Total Suspended Solids
5
s.u. = standard units
Table 2-2 Permitted Uses of Reclaimed Water
Permitted Uses
Category 1
● Reserved for potable reuse
● All uses in Categories 3, 4 and 5

● Drip irrigation on orchards or vineyards
● Spray or drip irrigation on sod farms, public access landscapes and public use areas/sports complexes, including
Category 2
unrestricted
access golf courses
● Toilet and urinal flushing
● Fire protection systems
● Commercial closed-loop air conditioning systems
● Vehicle and equipment washing (excluding self-service car washes)
● Range cattle watering
● All uses in Categories 4 and 5

● Subsurface irrigation of orchards or vineyards
● Restricted access landscape irrigation
Category 3
● Irrigation of livestock pasture

● Concrete mixing
● Dust control
● Aggregate washing/sieving
● New restricted access golf course irrigation systems
● Industrial cooling towers and once-through cooling systems
● Restricted access irrigation of sod farms
● All uses in Category 5

Category 4
● Soil compaction and similar construction activities

● Existing restricted golf course irrigation systems utilizing water that has received primary treatment in lagoon systems.
Permits
to construct shall not be issued for new Category 4 restricted access golf courses irrigation systems pending further
research and evaluation of performance data collected from existing systems.
Category 5
● Restricted access pasture irrigation for range cattle

● Restricted access irrigation of fiber, seed, forage and similar crops
● Irrigation of silviculture
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Okla
Table 3-1 Wastewater System Data Gathering To-Do List
System Name System Name
Task Person Responsible Target Completion Date
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
Table 3-1 Wastewater System Data Gathering To-Do List (Example)
System Name Any Town Oklahoma

N. Drew
Complete Wastewater System History (from Table B3.2) 10/1/2014
B. Lee
Locate Facilities Map (from Table B3.3) 10/1/2014
B. Lee
Gather Permits (from Table B3.4) 10/1/2014
N. Drew
Resolve Population Projections (from Table B3.5) 10/1/2014
N. Drew
Consider completing Historicalal Water Use (Table B3.6) 11/1/2015
H. Sparks
Compete Wastewater Flow Data (from Table B3.7) 11/1/2015
N. Drew
Gather influent information (Table B3.8) 11/1/2015
N. Drew
Gather WWTP Discharge Data (from Table B3.9) 11/1/2015
H. Sparks
Consider completing future flow projections (Table B3.10) 11/1/2015
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Okl
Table 3-2: Facility Map Actions Required
Attach documentation and/or identify below physical and/or electronic location of service area map(s) and facility diagram. Attach docume
Service area map(s) and facility diagram are attached.
Physical Location Electronic Location
Identified key facilities on service area map.
Attached site maps and treatment system schematics.
Identified future service area changes.
Identified known environmental or cultural areas.
State below any Information or assistance needed to finalize incomplete task(s).
Note: Check each box where statement is true. Note: Check each box w
Below
Table 3-2: Facility Map Actions Required (Example)
System Name Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)

Attach documentation and/or identify below physical and/or electronic location of service area map(s) and facility diagram.
✘ Service area map(s) and facility diagram are attached.

City Hall City Administrator's C-drive in the folder "WWTP" in
the sub-folder "Maps"
✘ Identified key facilities on service area map.
✘ Attached site maps and treatment system schematics.
✘ Identified future service area changes.
Identified known environmental or cultural areas.

Environmental and cultural information needed from (appropriate entities)
Note: Check each box where statement is true.
Below is an example of a simplified system diagram and sample map of a service area.
MY SYSTEM DIAGRAM
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide O
Table 3-3 Wastewater System History
Year Built
Type of Treatment Process 1
Describe secondary or
advanced treatment.
System has discharge Location
Historical Upgrades Date Completed
Identify all upgrades to

treatment system and date
completed.
Historical Permit Changes Date of Change
Identify all permit changes

and dates of changes.
Identify correspondence with

regulatory agencies, or
reference location.
Identify all environmental

reviews, or reference
location.
1
Mechanical, lagoon, septic, land application 1
Mechanical, lagoon,
Note: Check each box where statement is true. Note: Check each box
Table 3-3 Wastewater System History (Example)
Year Built 1978
Type of Treatment Process 1 Mechanical
Describe secondary or
advanced treatment.
Aeration basin followed by secondary clarification and UV disinfection
Locatio
System has discharge ✘
n
Discharges to Sugar Creek
Historical Upgrades Date Completed
Additional secondary clarifier installed, Clarifier number 1 rehabbed 2009
Bypass channel installed next to influent channel 2006
Identify all upgrades to Mechanical bar screen added in between trash rack and aeration
treatment system and date 2005
basin
completed.
Switched from chlorine disinfection to UV disinfection 2004
Installed parshall flume before aeration basin and replaced flow

1998
meter in effluent channel, influent pumps rehabbed
Historical Permit Changes Date of Change
OPDES renewal 2007
OPDES renewal 2011
Identify all permit changes

and dates of changes.
Identify correspondence with

regulatory agencies, or OCWP, EPA Region 6
reference location.
Identify all environmental

reviews, or reference None
location.
1
Mechanical, lagoon, septic, land application
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Planning Guide
Table 3-4: Permits
Permit Number: Please use a separate form for each permit. Permit Number:
Attach documentation and/or identify physical and/or electronic location of permit document(s) below. Attach documen
Documentation attached
City Hall, mayor
If the permit includes a schedule of use, enter information below. If the permit incl
Year Permitted Use (AFY) Comments Year
2012
Describe below any changes in the treatment process that have influenced effluent water quality if applicable. Describe below
Year Change in Treatment Process Year
2005
2006
Describe below any changes in the influent strength or flows that have influenced the treatment process. Describe below
Year Change in Influent Strength or Flows Year
2010
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Planning Guide
Table 3-4: Permits (Example)
Permit Number: 123456xx Please use a separate form for each permit.
Attach documentation and/or identify physical and/or electronic location of permit document(s) below.
✘ Documentation attached
City Hall, mayor's office – on the wall On City Manager's C-drive in the folder "WWTP" in the sub-
folder "Permits"
If the permit includes a schedule of use, enter information below.
Year Permitted Use (AFY) Comments
2012 2 for land application
Describe below any changes in the treatment process that have influenced effluent water quality if applicable.
Year Change in Treatment Process
2005 Added new secondary clarifier and bar screen to improve solids removal.
2006 Converted to UV so there are no chlorine residual impacts
Describe below any changes in the influent strength or flows that have influenced the treatment process.
Year Change in Influent Strength or Flows
2010 Influent BOD and TSS has increased, which has affected the influent quality.
Table 3-5: Historical Population
System Name
Historical Population Data
Population
Year Comments Data Source(s) 2
Served 1
Identify and describe below any significant events that have affected changes in area population.
Year Event
1
If population numbers are unavailable, estimate using number of connections times 2.5 persons.
2
Data sources may include the American Community Survey or other agency databases, published documents, etc
Table 3-5: Historical Population (Example)
Historical Population Data
Population
Year Comments Data Source(s) 2
Served 1
1920 395 US Census & City Planning Department
1930 368 Same

1940 375 Same
1950 498 Same
1960 772 Same
1970 1080 Same
1980 1027 Same
1990 1230 Same
2000 1500 Same
2010 2030 Increase due to meat processing plant Same
Identify and describe below any significant events that have affected changes in area population.
Year Event
2010 New meat processing plant.
1
If population numbers are unavailable, estimate using number of connections times 2.5 persons.
2
Data sources may include the American Community Survey or other agency databases, published documents, etc
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Oklah
Table 3-6: Historical Wastewater Flow
Historical Wastewater Flow Historical Wast
Demand (mgd)
Period of Data
(beginning date Data Source(s)
30-day Moving
to end date) ADF 1 ADMM 3 MinD 4 MD 5
Average Flow 2
Identify and describe below any significant events that may have affected flow. Examples may include a new company, loss of a Identify and de
company or an existing company that begins to produce more (or less) wastewater, etc. a company or a
Year Event
1
Calculate the current average daily flow (ADF) using a minimum of 1 year (3 years of data is preferred). 1
Calculate the current av
2
Calculate a 30-day moving average flow (see Appendix A). 2
Calculate a 30-day movi
3
Calculate the average day maximum month (ADMM) flow by determining the 95th percentile of the 30-day moving average values (see Appendix A). 3
Calculate the average d
4
Calculate the minimum day (MinD) flow by determining the 5th percentile of the 30-day moving average values (see Appendix A). 4
Calculate the minimum d
5
Calculate the MD flow by multiplying a factor of 1.2 to 2.0 to the ADF (see Appendix A). 5
Calculate the MD flow b
Below is an example of a simplified system diagram and sample map of a service area.
Table 3-6: Historical Wastewater Flow (Example)
Historical Wastewater Flow
Demand (mgd)
Period of Data
(beginning date Data Source(s)
30-day Moving
to end date) ADF 1 ADMM 3 MinD 4 MD 5
Average Flow 2
Influent flow meter linked to
3/1998 to 3/2001 0.35mgd See Appendix A See Appendix ASee Appendix A
recorder
Identify and describe below any significant events that may have affected flow. Examples may include a new company, loss of
a company or an existing company that begins to produce more (or less) wastewater, etc.
Year Event
2010 New meat processing plant
1
Calculate the current average daily flow (ADF) using a minimum of 1 year (3 years of data is preferred).
2
Calculate a 30-day moving average flow (see Appendix A).
3
Calculate the average day maximum month (ADMM) flow by determining the 95th percentile of the 30-day moving average values (see Appendix A).
4
Calculate the minimum day (MinD) flow by determining the 5th percentile of the 30-day moving average values (see Appendix A).
5
Calculate the MD flow by multiplying a factor of 1.2 to 2.0 to the ADF (see Appendix A).
Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Oklahoma C
Table 3-7 (page 1 of 3): Historical Influent Wastewater Characterization Table 3-7 (pa
BOD5 Historical Loading
Loading by Flow Type2 (lb/day)

Period of Data Constituent
(beginning date Concentration 30-day Moving Data Source(s)
to end date) (mg/L)1 ADF ADMM MinD MD
Average Flow
TSS Historical Loading

Average Flow
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Ok
Table 3-7 (page 2 of 3): Historical Influent Wastewater Characterization Ta
TKN Historical Loading

(beginning date Concentration Data Source(s)
30-day Moving
Average Flow
TP Historical Loading
Period of Data Constituent Loading by Flow Type2 (lb/day)

30-day Moving
Average Flow
__________ Historical Loading

Average Flow
Table 3-7 (page 3 of 3): Historical Influent Wastewater Characterization Ta

Average Flow
Identify any significant changes that may have affected flow. (Examples may include a company that has begun to use more water,
addition of a new company, or loss of a company, etc.)
Year Event
1
Sources for concentrations may be obtained from monthly DMRs. 1
Sources for concentra
2
Calculate the Loading by Flow Type by multiplying the concentration by the corresponding flow type in Table 3-6. 2
Calculate the Loadin
Table 3-7 (page 1 of 3): Historical Influent Wastewater Characterization (Example)
BOD5 Historical Loading

Average Flow
2008-2012 0.12 0.25 0.2
TSS Historical Loading

Average Flow
TKN Historical Loading

30-day Moving
Average Flow
TP Historical Loading

30-day Moving
Average Flow

Average Flow

Average Flow
Identify any significant changes that may have affected flow. (Examples may include a company that has begun to use more water,
addition of a new company, or loss of a company, etc.)
Year Event
1
Sources for concentrations may be obtained from monthly DMRs.
2
Calculate the Loading by Flow Type by multiplying the concentration by the corresponding flow type in Table 3-6.
Table 3-8: Pretreatment
List significant industrial sources and attach wastewater service plan for each.
Service Plan
Industrial Sources
is attached
If the utility has a pretreatment program that is different than ODEQ's program, attach program documents and/or describe
below.
Documentation is attached.
Note: Check each box where statement is true. Note: Check each
State below any Information or assistance needed to finalize incom
Table 3-8: Pretreatment (Example)
List significant industrial sources and attach wastewater service plan for each.
Service Plan is
Industrial Sources
attached
Meat Processing plant ✘
If the utility has a pretreatment program that is different than ODEQ's program, attach program documents and/or describe
below.

stance needed to finalize incomplete task(s). State below any Information or assistance needed to finalize incomplete
sistance needed to finalize incomplete task(s).
Table 3-9 (page 1 of 2): Major System Processes
System Name
Attach a schematic showing treatment processes or describe below.
Schematic is attached.
Level of Treatment:
Analysis of the existing system performance, deficiencies, and positive attributes:
Size of the system components:
Solids processing system and method of beneficial reuse or disposal:

Table 3-9 (page 2 of 2): Major System Processes
If a storm management plan is required attach the plan documents or describe below.

Table 3-9: Major System Processes (Example)
Attach a schematic showing treatment processes or describe below.

✘ Schematic is attached.
Level of Treatment:
Analysis of the existing system performance, deficiencies, and positive attributes:
Size of the system components:
Solids processing system and method of beneficial reuse or disposal:

Attached site maps and trea
If a storm management plan is required attach the plan documents or describe below.
✘ Documentation is attached.
Service area map(s) and fac
State below any Information or assistance needed to fi

Attached site maps and treatment system schematics.
formation or assistance needed to finalize incomplete task(s).

Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Oklahoma Com
Table 3-10: Collection System Pipe Information Ta
List below the total linear footage of each wastewater collection pipeline by size. List below the total linear footag
Common Normalized Common normalized

Total Linear Footage in System
Pipe Sizes pipe sizes
4 or 6 inches 4 or 6 inches
8 inches 8 inches
10 inches 10 inches
12 inches 12 inches
18 inches 18 inches
24 inches 24 inches
30 inches 30 inches
36 inches 36 inches
42 inches 42 inches
48 inches 48 inches
60 inches 60 inches
other other
other other
Total of All Lines Total of All Lines

State below any Information or assistance needed
Table 3-10: Collection System Pipe Information (Example)
Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)
List below the total linear footage of each wastewater collection pipeline by size.
Common normalized Total Linear Footage in Other pipe sizes not listed at
Total Linear Footage in System
pipe sizes System left (inches)
4 or 6 inches 25,000 24 2,000
8 inches 10,000
10 inches 5,000
12 inches
18 inches
24 inches
30 inches
36 inches
42 inches
48 inches
60 inches
other
other
Total of All Lines
ormation or assistance needed to finalize incomplete task(s).

Table 3-11: Historical Wastewater Effluent Characterization
System Name
Historical Wastewater Effluent Characterization
Period of Data
Permit
(beginning date Parameter Average Maximum Data Source(s)
Limit 1
to end date)
BOD5 (mg/L)
pH (s.u.)
TSS (mg/L)
Toal Coliform
(mg/L)
Chlorine (mg/L)
TKN (mg/L)
TP (mg/L)
Notes 2 (Reference Parameter)
List the discharge permit limit if applicable.

1
Include any relevant notes, such as number of times discharge permit limit exceeded, anticipated permit limit changes, etc.
2
Table 3-11: Historical Wastewater Effluent Characterization (Example)
Historical Wastewater Effluent Characterization
Period of Data
Permit
(beginning date Parameter Average Maximum Data Source(s)
Limit 1
to end date)
2005-2010 BOD5 (mg/L) 20.00 30 60.00
2005-2010 pH (s.u.) 8.60 8.6 9.30
2005-2010 TSS (mg/L) 30.00 30 45.00
Total Coliform
2005-2010 (mg/L)
2005-2010 Chlorine (mg/L) 1.00 1 5.00
2005-2010 TKN (mg/L) 4.00 4 6.00
2005-2010 TP (mg/L) 5.00 5 10.00
Notes 2 (Reference Parameter)
List the discharge permit limit if applicable.

1
Include any relevant notes, such as number of times discharge permit limit exceeded, anticipated permit limit changes, etc.
2
Table 3-12: TMDL and/or Wasteload Allocations Future Limits
System Name
TMDL and/or Wasteload Allocations Future Limits
TMDL and/or WLA (30-day average)

Parameter Data Source(s)
2015 - 2025 2025 - 2035 Beyond 2035
Table 3-12: TMDL and/or Wasteload Allocations Future Limits (Example)
TMDL and/or Wasteload Allocations Future Limits
TMDL and/or WLA (30-day average)

Parameter Data Source(s)
2015 - 2025 2025 - 2035 Beyond 2035
TSS 20
BOD 20
Phosphorus 5
Table 4-1: Asset Management: Inventory, Operation and Maintenance To-Do List
System Name
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 4-1: Asset Management: Inventory, Operation and Maintenance To-Do List (Example)
Meet with budget director, B. Jones to finalize

1 N.Drew 10/3/2013
2014 budget.
Pull Historicalal record of the system influent

2 B. James 8/10/2013
wasetwater flow.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 4-2: Flow Measurement / Metering
Date of assessment (mm/dd/yyyy)
FLOW MEASURING DEVICE1 Short-lived asset?2 Yes No
Primary Secondary
Type
Throat width (feet)
Capacity, million gallons per day (mgd)
Last calibration date (mm/dd/yyyy)
Installation date (mm/dd/yyyy)
Base effective useful life (years)
Estimated remaining effective useful life (years)
Replacement within next 5 years? Yes No Yes No
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent)
1
Use additional forms if necessary. 1
Use additional forms i
2
Short-lived assets are those that need to be replaced in 5 years.
Table 4-2: Flow Measurement / Metering (Example)
FLOW MEASURING DEVICE1 Short-lived asset? Yes No
Primary Secondary
Type Parshall Flume
Throat width (feet) 1
Capacity, million gallons per day (mgd) 0.6
Last calibration date (mm/dd/yyyy)
Base effective useful life (years) 20
Estimated remaining effective useful life (years) 7
Replacement within next 5 years? Yes No Yes No
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) Good
1
Use additional forms if necessary.
Table 4-3: Influent Pumps
Facility type
EQUIPMENT Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of pumps
Use numbered columns for each separate unit1 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3
Rated capacity of pump (gpm @ feet TDH)
Manufacturer
Solid passable size
Horsepower
Pump specifications Volts
Speed (rpm)
Variable or constant speed?
Initial Efficiency Rating
Replacement within next 5 years? Yes No Yes No Yes No
CONTROL Short-lived asset? Yes No
Instrumentation type
Description of control strategy

1
Use additional forms
Table 4-3: Influent Pumps (Example)
Facility type ATO WWTP Influent Pump Station
Number of pumps 1
Rated capacity of pump (gpm @ feet TDH) 200gpm @ 15 feet
Manufacturer ABC Pump Co
Solid passable size 2"
Horsepower 160
Pump specifications Volts 460
Speed (rpm) 1800
Variable or constant speed? variable
Replacement within next 5 years? ✘ Yes No Yes No Yes No
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) Fair
Instrumentation type PLC
Soft start and

Description of control strategy controlled by
SCADA
Variable or constant speed? variable
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) Fair

1
No
No
Table 4-4: Screenings Removal System
System System
Name Name
SYSTE
M
Use numbered columns for each separate unit 1 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3
Mechanical / Manual?
Manufacturer
Model Number
Drive Mechanism
SCREENS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of screens
Screen openings (inch or mm)
Screenings Washer / Compactor
Screenings conveyor
Screenings storage

1
Table 4-4: Screenings Removal System (Example)
System
Name Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)
SYSTEM
Mechanical / Manual? Manual
Manufacturer ABC company
Model Number ab-123-cd
Drive Mechanism belt
SCREENS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of screens 2
Screen openings (inch or mm) 1 inch
Screenings Washer / Compactor manual
Screenings conveyor manual
Screenings storage Dumpster
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) Good

1
No
No
Table 4-5: Grit Removal System
SYSTEM Short-lived asset? Yes No
Type (vortex, horizontal flow, etc.)
Manufacturer
Capacity
PUMP Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Units
Manufacturer
Horsepower
Specifications Volts
Speed (rpm)
MOTOR Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Units
Manufacturer
Horsepower
Motor Specifications Volts
Speed (rpm)
Grit slurry processing
1
Table 4-5: Grit Removal System (Example)
SYSTEM
Type (vortex, horizontal flow, etc.) Horizontal flow
Manufacturer ABC Company
Capacity 0.5
PUMP
Number of Units 1
Horsepower 5
Specifications Volts 220
Speed (rpm) 1000
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) yes
MOTOR
Number of Units 1
Horsepower 5
Motor Specifications Volts 220
Speed (rpm) 1800
Replacement within next 5 years? yes
Grit slurry processing 20
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) no
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) good
1
Table 4-6 (page 1 of 2): Wastewater Tanks
Purpose
CONTROL Short-lived asset? Yes No STRUCTURE
Identification
Number of Tanks
Type of tank2
f RECTANGULAR, Length,
Width,
Tank dimensions (feet) & Height.
If ROUND, Diameter
& Height.
Side water depth (feet)
Storage tank volume (million gallons)
Number of inlets
Type of inlet
(90° upturned flare, submerged side inlet, etc.)
Size of inlet (inches)
Number of outlets
Size of outlet (inches)
Additional manway(s)
Type of discharge
Operating elevation (if applicable)
Treatment capacity (if applicable)

CONTROL Short-lived asset? Yes No CONTROL
Identification
Use numbered columns for each separate unit1 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 U
Instrumentation Type (level sensor, altitude valve, etc.)
Tank level control strategy
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) Perceived cond
1
Use additional forms if n
2
Including clear wells and storage tanks in distribution. (Coated concrete, steel, etc.) 2
Including clear wells and
System Name Any Oklahoma Wastewater Treatment Facility
Purpose Wastewater treatment
STRUCTURE
Identification Aeration
Number of Tanks 2
Type of tank2 Rectangular Round
f RECTANGULAR, Length, 40
Width, 20
Tank dimensions (feet) & Height. 15
If ROUND, Diameter 65
& Height. 24
Side water depth (feet) 12 20
Storage tank volume (million gallons) 71800 158000
Number of inlets 1
Type of inlet
(90° upturned flare, submerged side inlet, etc.) submerged submerged
Size of inlet (inches) 18 18
Number of outlets 1
Size of outlet (inches) 18 18
Additional manway(s) 1 1
Type of discharge Gravity Gravity
Operating elevation (if applicable) 8 feet 8 feet
Treatment capacity (if applicable) 0.5 0.5
Base effective useful life (years) 20 20
Estimated remaining effective useful life (years) 7 12
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) no no

Table 4-6 (page 2 of 2): Wastewater Tanks (Example)
CONTROL
Identification SCADA
Instrumentation Type (level sensor, altitude valve, etc.) Level sensor Level sensor
controlled by controlled by
SCADA SCADA
Base effective useful life (years) 20 20
Estimated remaining effective useful life (years) 7 12
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) no no
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) good excellent

1
2
Including clear wells and storage tanks in distribution. (Coated concrete, steel, etc.)
Table 4-7 (page 1 of 2): Primary Clarification
System
Name
Clarification Type (conventional, high rate, solids contact,
etc.)
Design overflow rate (gpm/sf)
STRUCTURE Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Tanks
Type of tank (coated concrete, steel, etc.)
If RECTANGULAR, Length,
Width,
If ROUND, Diameter
& Height
Side water depth (feet)
Type of inlet (inlet trough, weir, pipe inlet, etc.)
Type of outlet (Launders, collection pipe, etc.)
Additional manway(s)
SOLIDS REMOVAL EQUIPMENT Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Units
Type (chain/flight, spiral, or plow scraper)
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)
Variable or constant speed

Use numbered columns for each separate unit 1

Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3
Instrumentation Type
1
System
Name Any Oklahoma Wastewater Treatment Facility

Clarification Type (conventional, high rate, solids contact,
etc.) conventional
Design overflow rate (gpm/sf) 700

STRUCTURE
Number of Tanks 700
Type of tank (coated concrete, steel, etc.) concrete
If RECTANGULAR, Length,
Width,
If ROUND, Diameter 100
& Height 15
Side water depth (feet) 10
Type of inlet (inlet trough, weir, pipe inlet, etc.) pipe
Type of outlet (Launders, collection pipe, etc.) weir
Additional manway(s) no
No Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) no
SOLIDS REMOVAL EQUIPMENT
Number of Units 1
Type (chain/flight, spiral, or plow scraper) plow scraper
Horsepower 1
Speed (rpm) 1
Variable or constant speed constant
No Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) yes

Table 4-7 (page 2 of 2): Primary Clarification (Example)
CONTROL
Instrumentation Type PLC
Valves open
close using
programmed
sequencing
controlled by
SCADA
No Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) yes
1
Guide
Table 4-8: Primary Sludge Pumps
Facility type
PUMPS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of pumps
Type of pump
Manufacturer
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)
Assumed solids concentration?
Number of units

1
Table 4-8: Primary Sludge Pumps (Example)
System Name Any Town, Oklahoma (ATO)
Facility type Mechanical WWTP
PUMPS
Number of pumps 1
Type of pump Centrifugal
Rated capacity of pump (gpm @ feet TDH) 100 @ 20
Horsepower 5
Speed (rpm) 1000
Assumed solids concentration? 0.15
Variable or constant speed? constant

Estimated remaining effective useful life
(years) 2
CONTROL
Number of units 1
Valves open & close

using programmed
Description of control strategy sequencing
controlled by
SCADA

Estimated remaining effective useful life
(years) 2
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) fair

1
Table 4-9: Secondary Treatment System - Suspended Growth
System System
Name Name
Number of Units
Type
Length
Dimensions (feet) Width
Height
Side Water Depth (feet)
Design Solids Retention Time [SRT] (days)
Hydraulic Retention Time [HRT] (hours)
Target MLSS (mg/L)
BLOWERS / AERATORS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Units
Type
Capacity (standard cubic feet per minute [scfm])
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)
1
Table 4-9: Secondary Treatment System - Suspended Growth (Example)
System
Name Any Town, Oklahoma (ATO)
SYSTEM
Number of Units 1

Type SBR
Length 20
Dimensions (feet) Width 20
Height 15
Side Water Depth (feet) 10
Design Solids Retention Time [SRT] (days) 2
Hydraulic Retention Time [HRT] (hours) 2.5
Target MLSS (mg/L) 2000
BLOWERS / AERATORS
Number of Units 2
Type PD
Capacity (standard cubic feet per minute [scfm]) 700
Horsepower 6
Speed (rpm) 1000

1
Table 4-10: Secondary Treatment System - Attached Growth
Number of Units
Type
Length
Height
HRT (hours)
Design BOD loading
Number of Units
Type
Capacity (scfm)
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)
1
Table 4-10: Secondary Treatment System - Attached Growth (Example)
SYSTEM
Number of Units 2

Type RBC
Length 50
Height 10
HRT (hours) 6
Design BOD loading 35
BLOWERS / AERATORS
Number of Units 2
Type PD
Capacity (scfm) 800
Horsepower 5
Speed (rpm) 1800

1
Table 4-11: Lagoon Systems
Number of Units
Type
Length
Depth
HRT (hours)
AERATORS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Units
Type
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)

1
Use additional forms if
Table 4-11: Lagoon Systems (Example)
SYSTEM
Number of Units 2

Type Flow through
Length 100
Depth 15
HRT (hours) 6
AERATORS
Number of Units 4
Type floating
Horsepower 5
Speed (rpm) 1000

1
Table 4-12: Other Systems
Number of Units
Identification/Type
Length
Dimensions Width
Height
Design SRT (days)
HRT (hours)
Target MLSS (mg/L)
Number of Units
Type
Capacity (scfm)
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)

1
Table 4-12: Other Systems (Example)
System Name
SYSTEM
Number of Units
Identification/Type
Length
Dimensions Width
Height
Design SRT (days)
HRT (hours)
Target MLSS (mg/L)
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No)
BLOWERS / AERATORS
Number of Units
Type
Capacity (scfm)
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)

1
Table 4-13: Disinfection
DISINFECTION Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Trains
Design Flow Capacity (mgd)
Peak flow Capacity (mgd)
Contact Time at Peak Flow (min)
Number of Passes per Basin
Pass Channel Width (feet)
Pass Channel Area (square feet)
Length per Pass (feet)
Channel Length-to-Width Ratio

1
Table 4-13: Disinfection (Example)
DISINFECTION
Number of Trains 1

Design Flow Capacity (mgd) 0.5
Peak flow Capacity (mgd) 1.5
Contact Time at Peak Flow (min) 15
Number of Passes per Basin 1
Pass Channel Width (feet) 5
Pass Channel Area (square feet) 160
Length per Pass (feet) 20
Channel Length-to-Width Ratio 0.0451388889

1
Table 4-14: Dechlorination
DECHLORINATION Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Trains
Design Flow Capacity (mgd)
Peak flow Capacity (mgd)
Contact Time at Peak Flow (min)
Number of Passes per Basin
Pass Channel Width (feet)
Pass Channel Area (square feet)
Length per Pass (feet)
Channel Length-to-Width Ratio

1
Table 4-14: Dechlorination (Example)
DECHLORINATION
Number of Trains 1

Design Flow Capacity (mgd) 0.5
Peak flow Capacity (mgd) 1.5
Contact Time at Peak Flow (min) 15
Number of Passes per Basin 1
Pass Channel Width (feet) 5
Pass Channel Area (square feet) 80
Length per Pass (feet) 100
Channel Length-to-Width Ratio 0.0451388889

1
Table 4-15: Ultraviolet Disinfection
Number of Reactors
Length
Reactor Chamber
Width
Dimensions (feet)
Depth
Number of Lamps per Reactor
Type of Lamp Used (magnetic, electronic)
Number of Ballasts per Reactor
Ballast Type2
Cleaning System Type
Cleaning System Details
Installation Date (mm/dd/yyyy)

Instrumentation Type
Description of Control Strategy
Tank Level Control Strategy

Base Effective Useful Lives of the following (years):
Reactor housing
Low-pressure lamps (LP and LPHO)
MP lamps
Sleeve
Duty and reference UV sensors
UVT analyzer

1
2
Low pressure (LP), low pressure high output (LPHO), medium pressure, etc 2
Low pressure (LP), lo
Table 4-15: Ultraviolet Disinfection (Example)

SYSTEM
Number of Reactors 2
Length 10
Reactor Chamber
Dimensions (feet)
Width 3
Depth 3
Number of Lamps per Reactor 100
Type of Lamp Used (magnetic, electronic) Medium pressure
Number of Ballasts per Reactor 3
Ballast Type 2
electronic
Cleaning System Type mechanical
Self cleaning based

Cleaning System Details on pre-set hours
used

Replacement within next 5 years? no
CONTROL
Instrumentation Type PLC
intensity is
Description of Control Strategy measured by PLC
display
Tank Level Control Strategy

Base Effective Useful Lives of the following (years):
Reactor housing 10
Low-pressure lamps (LP and LPHO) 3
MP lamps 2
Sleeve 5
Duty and reference UV sensors 5
UVT analyzer 5
1
2
Low pressure (LP), low pressure high output (LPHO), medium pressure, etc
Table 4-16 (Page 1 of 4): Membrane Clarification (MBR)

MEMBRANE MANUFACTURER GENERAL
Short-lived asset? Yes No
INFORMATION
Length
Overall rack dimensions (feet) Width
Height
Process description
Number of membrane filtration trains
Number of manifolds per train
Number of pressure vessels per train
Number of membrane elements per pressure vessel
Membrane identification
Length of membrane element
Surface area per membrane element
Instantaneous flux rate at 5 degrees C
Instantaneous flux rate per train at 20 degrees C
Spare Membrane Capacity
Maximum Allowable TMP
Pressure vessel rating
Pressure vessel diameter
MEMBRANE BACKWASH PUMPS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of pumps
Rated capacity of pumps
Manufacturer
Horsepower
Pump Specifications Volts
Speed (rpm)
Variable or Constant Speed
Backwash Pulse Duration, Frequency
Yes No Yes No Yes No


FILTERS Short-lived asset? Yes No

Number of filters
Filter type
Filter capacity (gpm/ft2)
Monomedia / Dual Media / Other
Type(s) of media
Backwash Type (Automatic / Manual)
Backwash Frequency and Duration

AIR SCOUR SYSTEM Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of blowers
Type of blower
Number of air compressors
Type of compressor

CLEAN-IN-PLACE (CIP) SYSTEM
Cleaning substances
Cleaning solution
pH range
Temperature range
Additional notes
Heats of dilution
Direction of flow for cleaning solution
ACID CIP
Type
Maximum concentration in cleaning solution
Minimum pH of cleaning solution
Specific gravity of maximum concentration

cleaning solution
Concentrate
Delivery options

SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE CIP

cleaning solution
Concentrate
Delivery options
CIP TANKS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of tanks
Type of tank
Tank material
Diameter
Tank Dimensions (feet)
Height
Tank volume
Assumed freeboard
Tank inlet for permeate filling
Tank inlet for alkaline solution filling
Tank inlet for citric acid
Tank inlet/outlet for cleaning solution
Other outlets
Tank heater type
Heater capacity
Heater material of construction
Configuration
Temperature range of cleaning solution
Heating time
Estimated tank weight (with flange connections)
Estimated fluid weight
Installation date (dd/mm/yyyy)

No No No

CIP FEED PUMPS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of CIP feed pumps
Type
Rated flow and TDH
Pump operating pressure
Pump horsepower
Motor horsepower
Volts
Electrical service Phase
Hertz
Assumed efficiency
Materials of construction
Suction connection
Discharge connection

1
Table 4-16 (Page 1 of 4): Membrane Clarification (MBR) (Example)
System Name
MEMBRANE MANUFACTURER GENERAL INFORMATION
Length
Overall rack dimensions (feet) Width
Height
Process description
Number of membrane filtration trains
Number of manifolds per train
Number of pressure vessels per train
Number of membrane elements per pressure vessel
Membrane identification
Length of membrane element
Surface area per membrane element
Instantaneous flux rate at 5 degrees C
Instantaneous flux rate per train at 20 degrees C
Spare Membrane Capacity
Maximum Allowable TMP
Pressure vessel rating
Pressure vessel diameter
MEMBRANE BACKWASH PUMPS
Number of pumps
Rated capacity of pumps
Manufacturer
Horsepower
Pump Specifications Volts
Speed (rpm)
Variable or Constant Speed
Backwash Pulse Duration, Frequency


FILTERS
Number of filters
Filter type
Filter capacity (gpm/ft2)
Monomedia / Dual Media / Other
Type(s) of media
Backwash Type (Automatic / Manual)
Backwash Frequency and Duration
AIR SCOUR SYSTEM
Number of blowers
Type of blower
Type of compressor
CLEAN-IN-PLACE (CIP) SYSTEM
Cleaning substances
Cleaning solution
pH range
Temperature range
Additional notes
Heats of dilution
Direction of flow for cleaning solution
ACID CIP
Type

cleaning solution
Concentrate
Delivery options

SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE CIP
Sample

cleaning solution
Concentrate Only
Delivery options
CIP TANKS
Number of tanks
Type of tank
Tank material
Diameter
Tank Dimensions (feet)
Height
Tank volume
Assumed freeboard
Tank inlet for permeate filling
Tank inlet for alkaline solution filling
Tank inlet for citric acid
Tank inlet/outlet for cleaning solution
Other outlets
Tank heater type
Heater capacity
Heater material of construction
Configuration
Temperature range of cleaning solution
Heating time
Estimated tank weight (with flange connections)
Estimated fluid weight

CIP FEED PUMPS
Number of CIP feed pumps
Type
Rated flow and TDH

Sample
Only
Pump operating pressure
Pump horsepower
Motor horsepower
Volts
Hertz
Assumed efficiency
Materials of construction
Suction connection
Discharge connection

1
Table 4-17 (Page 1 of 2): Filtration
Facility name
Number of dual-cell filters
Type of filter
Design filtration rate
Empty bed contact time
Length
Dimensions, each filter cell Width
Height
Total surface area
Filter media
Underdrain
Filter media support
Wash water troughs
AIR SCOUR BLOWERS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of blowers
Type of blower
Capacity
Discharge pressure
Motor horsepower
Volts
Hertz
Maximum blower speed

No No No

Table 4-17 (Page 2 of 2): Filtration
MEDIA Short-lived asset? Yes No
Type of media
FILTER BACKWASH PUMPS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Facility name
Number of pumps
Type of pump
Rated capacity of pump
Manufacturer
Discharge diameter
Horsepower
Pump specifications Voltage
Speed (rpm)
Type drive
Valves and appurtenances
FILTER BACKWASH BLOWERS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of blowers
Type of blower
AIR COMPRESSORS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Type of compressor
1
Table 4-17 (Page 1 of 2): Filtration (Example)
System Name
Facility name
Number of dual-cell filters
Type of filter
Design filtration rate
Empty bed contact time Sample

Only
Length
Dimensions, each filter cell Width
Height
Total surface area
Filter media
Underdrain
Filter media support
Wash water troughs
Replacement within next 5 years?
AIR SCOUR BLOWERS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of blowers
Type of blower
Capacity
Discharge pressure
Motor horsepower
Volts
Hertz
Maximum blower speed
Replacement within next 5 years?

No No No

Table 4-17 (Page 2 of 2): Filtration (Example)
MEDIA Short-lived asset? Yes No
Type of media
FILTER BACKWASH PUMPS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Facility name
Number of pumps
Type of pump
Rated capacity of pump
Manufacturer
Discharge diameter
Horsepower
Pump specifications Voltage
Speed (rpm)
Type drive
Valves and appurtenances
FILTER BACKWASH BLOWERS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of blowers
Type of blower
AIR COMPRESSORS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Type of compressor
1
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Table 4-18 (Page 1 of 2): Solids Thickening - Aerobic Digestion Facilities
System System
Name Name
Use numbered columns for each separate unit Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3
SLUDGE THICKENING SYSTEM Short-lived asset? Yes No SLUDGE THIC
Type1
Number of units
Diameter (feet)
Surface area (feet)
Belt width (meters)
Solids loading (ppd / ft)
Hydraulic capacity (gpd)
Air to solids ratio
Solids loading capacity (ppd)
CONDITIONING AGENT(S) USED
Type (polymers, metal salts, other coagulant)
Average feed solids (percent)
Average dewatered solids (percent)
PUMP(S) Short-lived asset? Yes No PUMP(S)
Number of units
Capacity (gpm / TDH)
Motor size (hp)
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Table 4-18 (Page 2 of 2): Solids Thickening - Aerobic Digestion Facilities Tab
BOTTOM PUMP OR SLUDGE FEED PUMP Short-lived asset? Yes No BOTTOM PUM
Number of units
Type
Pump capacity (gpm / TDH)
Motor size (hp)
THICKENING WASTE SLUDGE PUMP Short-lived asset? Yes No THICKENING
Number of units
Type
Sludge concentration
Pump capacity (gpm / TDH)
Motor size (hp)
COMPRESSOR(S) Short-lived asset? Yes No COMPRESSO
Number of units
Motor size (hp)
Wasting rate (number hours / days / week)
1
DAF/Gravity Thickener/Gravity Belt Thickener/Rotary Drum Thickener, etc 1
DAF/Gravity Thickener
Table 4-18 (Page 1 of 2): Solids Thickening - Aerobic Digestion Facilities
System
SLUDGE THICKENING SYSTEM
Type1 Gravity thickening
Number of units 2
Diameter (feet) 20
Surface area (feet) 1200
Belt width (meters) N/A (Gravity)
Solids loading (pounds per day [ppd / ft]) 20
Hydraulic capacity (gpd) 8000
Air to solids ratio N/A (Gravity)
Solids loading capacity (ppd) 1200
CONDITIONING AGENT(S) USED
Type (polymers, metal salts, other coagulant) polymer
Average feed solids (percent) 15
Average dewatered solids (percent) 90
PUMP(S)
Number of units 3
Capacity (gpm / TDH) 150 @ 12 ft TDH
Motor size (hp) 5
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) poor

Table 4-18 (Page 2 of 2): Solids Thickening - Aerobic Digestion Facilities (Example)
BOTTOM PUMP OR SLUDGE FEED PUMP
Number of units 3
Type Centrifugal
Pump capacity (gpm / TDH) 150 @ 12 ft TDH
Motor size (hp) 5
THICKENING WASTE SLUDGE PUMP
Number of units 2
Type PD
Sludge concentration 10
Pump capacity (gpm / TDH) 150 @ 12 ft TDH
Motor size (hp) 5
COMPRESSOR(S)
Number of units 2
Motor size (hp) 5
Wasting rate (number hours / days / week) 5hr/week

1
DAF/Gravity Thickener/Gravity Belt Thickener/Rotary Drum Thickener, etc
Table 4-19: Solids Thickening - Anaerobic Digestion Facilities
ANAEROBIC DIGESTER(S) Short-lived asset? Yes No ANAEROBIC D
Number of units
Volume (gal.)
RECIRCULATION PUMP(S) Short-lived asset? Yes No RECIRCULAT
Number of units
Type
Motor size (hp)
GAS COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL Short-lived asset? Yes No GAS COLLEC
Number of units
Type
DIGESTED SOLIDS PUMP(S) Short-lived asset? Yes No DIGESTED SO
Number of units
Type
Motor size (hp)
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) Perceived con

1
Table 4-19: Solids Thickening - Anaerobic Digestion Facilities (Example)
ANAEROBIC DIGESTER(S)
Number of units 1
Volume (gal.) 500000
RECIRCULATION PUMP(S)
Number of units 3
Type Centrifugal
Motor size (hp) 5
GAS COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
Number of units 1
Type Flare
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) Yes, no formal plans
DIGESTED SOLIDS PUMP(S)
Number of units 3
Type Centrifugal
Motor size (hp) 5

1
Table 4-20: Dewatering / Disposal Methods
DEWATERING PROCESS Short-lived asset? Yes No
Type (belt press, centrifuge, etc.)
Design solids loading
Operating hours per week
FINAL DISPOSAL Short-lived asset? Yes No
Method (incineration, land application, etc.)
1
Table 4-20: Dewatering / Disposal Methods
DEWATERING PROCESS
Type (belt press, centrifuge, etc.) Belt Press
Design solids loading 200
Operating hours per week 12
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) No
FINAL DISPOSAL
Method (incineration, land application, etc.) Land application
Base effective useful life (years) 20 for mechanism

1
Table 4-21 (Page 1 of 2): Odor Control

Date of assessment
(mm/dd/yyyy)
Location of system
ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Units
Type2
Manufacturer
Model No.
Size
Treatment capacity (cfm)
CHEMICAL STORAGE/STRENGTH Short-lived asset? Yes No
Number of Tanks
Tank Material of Construction
Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Capacity (gals)
Sodium Hypochlorite Strength (percent)
Sodium Hydroxide Storage Capacity (gals)
Sodium Hydroxide Strength (percent)
RECIRCULATION Short-lived asset? Yes No
Pump Type
Model No.
Horsepower
Capacity (gpm)

Table 4-21 (Page 2 of 2): Odor Control
CHEMICAL METERING Short-lived asset? Yes No
Pump Type
Model
Horsepower
Capacity (gpm)
1
2
Scrubbers, biofilters, etc. 2
Scrubbers, biofilters,
Table 4-21 (Page 1 of 2): Odor Control (Example)

Date of assessment
(mm/dd/yyyy)
Location of system 1 mile south of Any Town Oklahoma on highway 36
ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM
Number of Units 1
Type 2
Scrubber
Manufacturer ABC Co.
Model No. centrifugal
Size 200
Treatment capacity (cfm) 2000
Chemical Storage/Strength
Number of Tanks 2
Tank Material of Construction metal
Sodium Hypochlorite Storage Capacity (gals) 200
Sodium Hypochlorite Strength (percent) 15
Sodium Hydroxide Storage Capacity (gals) 200
Sodium Hydroxide Strength (percent) 15
Recirculation
Pump Type centrifugal
Model No. abc 12
Horsepower 1
Capacity (gpm) 150

Table 4-21 (Page 2 of 2): Odor Control (Example)
Chemical Metering
Pump Type centrifugal
Model abc 12
Horsepower 1
Capacity (gpm) 150

1
2
Scrubbers, biofilters, etc.
Table 4-22: Pump(s)
System System
Name Name
Number of pumps
Type (suction lift, submersible, etc.)
Manufacturer
Solid passable size?
Horsepower
Speed (rpm)
PUMP CONTROL Short-lived asset? Yes No
1
Table 4-22: Pump(s) (Example)
System
EQUIPMENT
Number of pumps 3
Type (suction lift, submersible, etc.) Centrifugal
Rated capacity of pump (gpm @ feet TDH) 700 gpm @ 17 ft TDH
Solid passable size? 1
Horsepower 5
Speed (rpm) 1180
Variable or constant speed? constant
PUMP CONTROL
Pump start and

Description of control strategy Stopped using
SCADA.

1
Table 4-23: Critical Pipeline(s)
System Name Location System Name
PIPELINES Short-lived asset? Yes No PIPELINES
Number of pipelines (by diameter)
Diameter of pipe (in)
Approximate length in this location (linear feet)
Pipe material
Maximum design flow (gpm)
Maximum velocity (fps)
Minimum design flow (gpm)
Minimum velocity (fps)

1
Table 4-23: Critical Pipeline(s) (Example)
System Name Any Town, Oklahoma (ATO) Location
PIPELINES
Number of pipelines (by diameter) 1

Diameter of pipe (in) 16
Approximate length in this location (linear feet) 10000
Pipe material HDPE
Maximum design flow (gpm) 200
Maximum velocity (fps) 15
Minimum design flow (gpm) 50
Minimum velocity (fps) 3
Replacement within next 5 years? (Yes/No) No

1
Table 4-24: Other Key Features
OTHER KEY FEATURES (for which a table was not provided)
Feature Description/Value, etc. Condition1

1
Perceived condition (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent) 1
Perceived condition (Po
Table 4-24: Other Key Features (Example)
OTHER KEY FEATURES (for which a table was not provided)
Feature Description/Value, etc. Condition1
Asphalt eroded due to heavy rain, needs

Access Road to the WWTP poor
replacement
Heater at Lab Building Not working- Needs replacement poor

1
Table 4-25: Items to be Replaced in 5 Years
System Name
Name Date Means of Replacement1
1
Authority's Cash, Bond Issue, Rate Increase, Bank Loan, CWSRF Low-Interest Loan, other
Table 4-25: Items to be Replaced in 5 Years (Example)
System Name
Name Date Means of Replacement1
1
Authority's Cash, Bond Issue, Rate Increase, Bank Loan, CWSRF Low-Interest Loan, other
Table 4-26: Facility Staffing Data
System Name
Existing
Population Staffing
Facility Name Staffing Meets
Served Requirements
Requirements

Table 4-26: Facility Staffing Data (Example)

Existing
Population Staffing
Facility Name Staffing Meets
Served Requirements
Requirements
Any Town Oklahoma, Wastewater Treatment Plant 2150 2 ✘

Table 4-27 Personnel Data
System Name
Name Title/Certification Level1 Email Telephone
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
1
Cross check the operator licensure level with the facility classification.
Table 4-27 Personnel Data (Example)
Name Title/Certification Level1 Email Telephone
WWTP Manager, Day 555.555.5555

N. Drew ndrew@atowwtp.com
Class B Ceritfication Night 555.555.4444
WWTP Operator/Technician Day 555.555.5555

A. Roberts aroberts@atowwtp.com
Ckass C Ceritfication Night 555.555.4444
Day 555.555.5555
A. Cordes City Manager acordes@ato.com
Night
Day 555.555.5555
H. Jackson City Planner hjackson@ato.com
Night 555.555.4444
Day 555.555.5555
M. Daniels City Engineer mdaniels@ato.com
Night 555.555.4444
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
1
Cross check the operator licensure level with the facility classification.
Table 4-28: Routine Operation and Preventative Maintenance Program
System Name
Attach documentation and/or describe routine operation and preventative maintenance programs.
Table 4-28: Routine Operation and Preventative Maintenance Program (Example)
Attach documentation and/or describe routine operation and preventative maintenance programs.
ATO WWTP serves a population of 2,150. The system's capacity and staffing are adequate at present with system repairs
and upgrades performed as needed and personnel certfication maintained. The system is an activated sludge wastewater
treatment plant that consists of screening, grit removal, sedimentation, aeration, and disinfection. The system has five
wastewater pump stations, one of them is an influent triplex pump station and the remaining four are duplex pump stations.
All periodic observations, adjustments, and repairs are documented and available for reference and/or review to ensure
system operational dependability and personnel accountability.
Table 4-29: Routine and Preventative Maintenance Data
System Name
Function Frequency
List below items to check Enter function

and/or adjust1 performance interval2
1
Such as adjusting flow control valves, reading flow meters, checking water or chemical levels, exercising critical valves, lubricating equipment, etc.
2
Daily, weekly, monthly, etc.
Table 4-29: Routine and Preventative Maintenance Data (Example)
Function Frequency
List below items to check Enter function

and/or adjust1 performance interval2
Clean Trash Rack Daily
Take Screening to Landfill Monthly
Check Pump station Daily
Check All process units and read flow meters Three times daily
Exercise isolation valves Monthly
Ceck DO in aeration basin,adjust aeration rate as required Weekly
Check UV channel/change out bulbs if needed Weekly
Change out biosolids bags Weekly
Submit MORs Weekly
1
Such as adjusting flow control valves, reading flow meters, checking water or chemical levels, exercising critical valves, lubricating equipment, etc.
2
Daily, weekly, monthly, etc.
Table 4-30: Normal Operational Data Tips and Tricks
System Name
Element Setting
List below items which require specific settings1 Enter setting values or specific instructions including units below2
1
Such as valve, switch, control, etc.
2
Such as valve position, readings for pump controls, gauges, electrical switches, etc.
Table 4-30: Normal Operational Data Tips and Tricks (Example)
Element Setting
List below items which require specific settings1 Enter setting values or specific instructions including units below2
Valve 1 going to Clarifier 1 Valve is set at 75% open to achieve even flow split between Clarifier 1 & 2
WAS (Waste Activated Sludge) WAS wasted 10 minutes every hour
MLSS (Mixed Liquor suspended solids) MLSS at aeration basin of 3500 mg/L
1
Such as valve, switch, control, etc.
2
Such as valve position, readings for pump controls, gauges, electrical switches, etc.
Table 4-31: Suppliers
System Name
Supply Item(s) Contractor / Supplier Email - Website Telephone
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Table 4-31: Suppliers (Example)
Supply Item(s) Contractor / Supplier Email - Website Telephone
jbrown@abcchemical.com Day
Polymer (Sludge) ABC Chemical Company
abcchemical .com Night
ron.white@xyzpumps.com Day
Pumps, Parts/Repair XYZ Pumps
xyzpumps.com Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Day
Night
Table 5-1: Wastewater System Management To-Do List
System Name
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 5-1: Wastewater System Management To-Do List (Example)
Meet with ATO's budget director, B. Jones to discuss

1 N. Drew 10/1/2013
2014 system needs.
Complete remainder of section (Tables 5.9 through 5-13)

2 at later time. Requires pulling Historicalal records, talking N. Drew 8/11/2013
with others, etc.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 5-2: (page 1 of 4) Wastewater System Administration
1 Select type of system ownership (check all that apply).
Type of Ownership Name
Water/Wastewater Association
Local government
Corporation
Single private owner
Partnership
Other, describe below.
2 List name(s) of owner(s), below. (Use additional sheet if necessary.)
If there are written system rules, attach document or identify physical and/or electronic location of information below.
3
Identify and check below who makes major decisions for the system (such as when to make capital improvements, how to
4
finance improvements, when to expand/consolidate, etc.).
SINGLE PARTY (Identify):
BOARD Length of
Selected by:
Number of members: service (years):
SYSTEM USER GROUP Length of

Selected by:
COMMISSION Length of
Selected by:
State below any other decision-making individuals or parties not listed above and describe association with organization.
5 How often do those responsible for decision making meet?
Monthly
Annually
When necessary, describe below.
6 If all system users are notified about these meetings, identify the notification process (check all that apply).
Notice on water bill.
Telephone distribution list
Email distribution list
Notice in local paper
7 If water/wastewater bills are mailed, select and check frequency below.

Monthly
8 If water/wastewater bills are not mailed, describe below the notification process and frequency.
9 What is the plan for financing future system improvements (check all that apply)?
Reserve account(s)
Loans
Grants
System user rates or one time fees

Unknown at this time

Personnel Management: If the system has paid employees and there are policies in place regarding personnel management
10 (salaries, benefits, hiring/firing, supervision, raises, etc.), describe the process and attach documentation or identify physical
and/or electronic location of information below.
Plan in Case of Operator Loss: If the system has an operator, and there is a plan in place in the event of operator loss,
11
describe the process and attach or identify physical and/or electronic location of information below.
Customer Complaints Process: If there is a process to record and respond to customer complaints, describe the process
12
and attach or identify physical and/or electronic location of information below.

13 Insurance Policies: If the system has insurance policies, check all that apply and list coverage amounts:
Policy Coverage Coverage Amount
Commercial General Liability
Automobile Liability
Garage Liability
Excess/Umbrella Liability
Workers Compensation and Employers Liability
Employment Practices Liability
Flood Liability
Other, describe below
Attach documentation or identify physical and/or electronic location of policy information below.
Physical Location of Policy Electronic Location of Policy
Safety Procedures: If the system has written safety procedures, describe the process and attach or identify physical and/or
14
electronic location of information below.
Financial Transaction Personnel: Identify and list below the person/party responsible for conducting financial transactions
15
(maintaining records, customer billings, making debt payments, etc.)
Name Title Responsibility

Note: Check each box where statement is true. Note: Check each box
Table 5-2: (page 1 of 4) Wastewater System Administration (Example)

1 Select type of system ownership (check all that apply).
Type of Ownership Name
Water/Wastewater Association
✘ Local government Any Town, Oklahoma
Corporation
Single private owner
Partnership
2 List name(s) of owner(s), below. (Use additional sheet if necessary.)
If there are written system rules, attach document or identify physical and/or electronic location of information below.
3
File cabinet in City Manager's office. City Manager's computer hard drive, C:\ATO Rules
Identify and check below who makes major decisions for the system (such as when to make capital improvements, how to
4
finance improvements, when to expand/consolidate, etc.).
SINGLE PARTY (Identify):
✘ BOARD Length of
Number of members: 5 service (years): 2 Selected by: City Manager and Mayor
SYSTEM USER GROUP Length of

Selected by:
COMMISSION Length of
Selected by:
✘ State below any other decision-making individuals or parties not listed above and describe association with organization.
WWTP Manager - technical input.

5 How often do those responsible for decision making meet?
✘ Monthly
Annually
When necessary, describe below.
6 If all system users are notified about these meetings, identify the notification process (check all that apply).
✘ Notice on water bill.
Telephone distribution list
Email distribution list
✘ Notice in local paper
7 If water/wastewater bills are mailed, select and check frequency below.

✘ Monthly
8 If water/wastewater bills are not mailed, describe below the notification process and frequency.
N/A
9 What is the plan for financing future system improvements (check all that apply)?
✘ Reserve account(s)
Loans
✘ Grants
✘ System user rates or one time fees

✘
Unknown at this time

Personnel Management: If the system has paid employees and there are policies in place regarding personnel management
10 (salaries, benefits, hiring/firing, supervision, raises, etc.), describe the process and attach documentation or identify physical
and/or electronic location of information below.
Policy Manual for City employees. On file and copies City Manager's computer hard drive, C:\ATO Policy
distributed as requested.
Plan in Case of Operator Loss: If the system has an operator, and there is a plan in place in the event of operator loss,
11
describe the process and attach or identify physical and/or electronic location of information below.
Policy Manual for City employees.

File cabinet in City Manager's office. City Manager's computer hard drive, C:\ATO Policy
Customer Complaints Process: If there is a process to record and respond to customer complaints, describe the process
12
and attach or identify physical and/or electronic location of information below.

13 Insurance Policies: If the system has insurance policies, check all that apply and list coverage amounts:
Policy Coverage Coverage Amount
✘ Commercial General Liability ###

✘ Automobile Liability $60,000.00
Garage Liability
Excess/Umbrella Liability
✘ Workers Compensation and Employers Liability as required
Employment Practices Liability
Flood Liability
Other, describe below
Attach documentation or identify physical and/or electronic location of policy information below.
Physical Location of Policy Electronic Location of Policy

File cabinet in City Manager's office.
Safety Procedures: If the system has written safety procedures, describe the process and attach or identify physical and/or
14
electronic location of information below.
Basic safety, no confined space entry, accident prevention, lock-out/tag out.
Financial Transaction Personnel: Identify and list below the person/party responsible for conducting financial transactions
15
(maintaining records, customer billings, making debt payments, etc.)
Name Title Responsibility
A. Cordes City Manager (with annual outside audit)

Table 5-3: System Management Checklist
System Management Information System Mana
Completed system management table
Identified any potential changes to current practices on To-Do list.
Attached documentation used to develop tables or identify physical and/or electronic location of information here.
State below any Information or assistance needed to finalize incomplete task(s)
Table 5-3: System Management Checklist (Example)
System Management Information
✘ Completed system management table
Identified any potential changes to current practices on To-Do list.
✘ Attached documentation used to develop tables or identify physical and/or electronic location of information here.

Extend Sewer service
Continue to identify and consider any potential changes that may benefit system management.

Table 5-4: Rate Schedule Descriptions
All customers are charged the same amount regardless of their water usage or wastewater generated. The
Flat Rate flat (or fixed) rate may be used in systems that do not meter water usage and may also be used in conjunction
with other rate structures to cover administrtive costs and customer expenses.
All customers are charged the same amount per water usage (typically 1,000 gallons). The uniform rate
Uniform Rate
requires metering, allowing customers to pay for their individual usage .
A surcharge is assessed on the quantity of extra strength waste being treated that exceeds residential
Surcharge
strength waste. The surcharge is usually assessed by the pound.
Table 5-5: Rate Schedule Information
Describe below the system's rate schedule. Describe below
Attach the system's rate schedule document or identify physical and/or electronic location below.
List below the distribution of monthly billable gallons by customer type. List below the
Customer Type No. of Customers Billable Gallons Customer Type No. of Customers Billable Gallons
Billing period: Monthly Other: Describe
Describe the System's policy for changing wastewater rates. Select one of the options below. Describe the S
A vote is required to change rates. By whom? ✘
A vote is not required to change rates. Describe below the process for changing rates
If there a maximum monthly quantity billed to residential wastewater customers, show the quantity? gals. If there a maxim
If a percent of water used by residential customers determines wastewater volume charges, show the percentage? % If a percent of
Describe below the customer billing process. Describe below
Metered - Describe the metering process. Non-Metered - Describe water usage determination (billing) process.
What percentage of customers is metered? % %
Table 5-5: Rate Schedule Information (Example)
Describe below the system's rate schedule.

The majority of consumers pay according to use. All houses and apartments are based on water billing, however, for
apartments, typically, there is not a meter for every unit. The apartments are charged for the amount of water the
entire apartment complex uses and it is divided by the number of occupied apartments. This is not mandated by city
government, but rather a choice by the apartment developers. Business with industrial codes pay a surcharge based on
strength.
Attach the system's rate schedule document or identify physical and/or electronic location below.
Utility rate ordinance at City Hall City website
List below the distribution of monthly billable gallons by customer type.
Customer Type No. of Customers Billable Gallons Customer Type No. of Customers Billable Gallons
Residential 800 565,000
Commercial 20 150,000
industrial 1 25,000
Billing period: Monthly✘ Other: Describe Quarterly
Describe the System's policy for changing wastewater rates. Select one of the options below.
✘ A vote is required to change rates. By whom? System Board Members
A vote is not required to change rates. Describe below the process for changing rates
If there a maximum monthly quantity billed to residential wastewater customers, show the quantity? 3,000 gals.
If a percent of water used by residential customers determines wastewater volume charges, show the percentage? 8.0 %
Describe below the customer billing process.
Metered - Describe the metering process. Non-Metered - Describe water usage determination (billing) process.
Residential meters (water) read manually monthly, large City ordinance for six customers without meters. Ordinance
commercial users have remote metering. sets monthly rate.
What percentage of customers is metered? 95.0 %%

Table 5-6: Existing Debt
System Name
List below information on the system's existing debt.
Amount of Debt Repayment Period

Interest Amount paid Payment
Debt Name
Rate Annually Interval
Original Remaining Original Remaining
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
Table 5-6: Existing Debt (Example)
List below information on the system's existing debt.
Amount of Debt Repayment Period

Interest Amount paid Payment
Debt Name
Rate Annually Interval
Original Remaining Original Remaining
2009 WWTP Upgrade $ 1500000 $ 1250000 20 18 4 % $ 110000 Monthly
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
$ $ % $
Table 5-7: Funded System Improvement Projects
System Name
Potential
Asset/Project Name Expected Year Project Description or Purpose Cost Estimate
Funding Source1
Known Projects Estimated Cost $

1
Funded with cash, bond issue, rate increase, bank loan, CWSRF loan, other
Table 5-7: Funded System Improvement Projects (Example)
Project Name Project Description or Purpose Cost Funding Source
Meter Replacement Ongoing program $ 10,000.00 Operating budget
Repairs and replacements

Wastewater Conveyance Maintenance $ 100,000.00 Operating budget
anticipated
Odor Control Chemical addition to manage odor $ 5,000.00 Operating budget
Known Projects Total Cost $ 115,000.00

1
Table 5-8: Unfunded System Improvement Projects
System Name
Expected Potential
Asset/Project Name Project Description or Purpose Cost Estimate
Year Funding Source1
Known Projects Estimated Cost $

1
Table 5-8: Unfunded System Improvement Projects (Example)
Potential
Project Name Project Description or Purpose Cost Estimate
Funding Source
Influent Pumps Replacement of Influent Pumps $ 375,000.00 Unknown at this time
Known Projects Estimated Cost $ 375,000.00

1
Table 5-9: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)
System Name
Expected Potential
Year Funding Source1
Capital Improvement Projects Total Cost $

1
Table 5-9: Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) (Example)
System Name Any Town, Oklahoma
Expected Potential Funding

Year Source1
Replace 5,000 LF of 6" forcemain from

Forcemain 2014 Main Street PS to manhole on First $ 20000 Utility Fees
Street
Grant/Assess
Aeration Basin 2015 Expansion of aeration basin $ 2000000
surcharge
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
Capital Improvement Projects Total Cost $ 2,020,000

1
Table 5-10: Short-Lived Assets
System
Name
Potential
Asset Work Description Cost Estimate
Funding Source
$
Table 5-11: Operational Budget
Year Year Year Year Year

Budget Item
Operating revenues (including

A wastewater rates, service impact fees, $ $ $ $ $ A
other)
Operating Expenses (including

salaries and benefits, insurance,
routine and preventative
B $ $ $ $ $ B
maintenance, others less power,
chemicals and other variable
expenses)
Expenses
C Operating expenses due to CIP $ $ $ $ $ C
Other expenses (including

emergency or unplanned
D $ $ $ $ $ D
repairs/projects, professional
services, training, etc.)
E Taxes (paid by the utility system) $ $ $ $ $ E
F Debt payments $ $ $ $ $ F
G Operating Budget Total [A – (B through F)] $ $ $ $ $ G

Table 5-10: Operational Budget (Example)
Year Year Year Year

Budget Item
Operating revenues (including

wastewater rates, service impact fees, $ 600,000 $ $ $
other)
Operating Expenses (including

salaries and benefits, insurance,
routine and preventative
maintenance, others less power,
$ 120,000 $ $ $
chemicals and other variable
expenses)
40,000
Expenses
Operating expenses due to CIP $ $ $ $
Other expenses (including

emergency or unplanned
repairs/projects, professional
$ 40,000 $ $ $
services, training, etc.)
Taxes (paid by the utility system) $ 20,000 $ $ $
Debt payments $ 120,000 $ $ $
Operating Budget Total [A – (B through F)] $ 260,000 $ $ $

Table 5-12: Capital Improvements Budget
System
Name
Year Year Year Year Year
Budget Item
Capital Improvement Project

A $ $ $ $ $
(CIP) Costs
Financing Sources
1. Grants $ $ $ $ $
2. Reserves $ $ $ $ $
B
3. Loans/Bonds $ $ $ $ $
4. User Charges $ $ $ $ $
CIP Total [A –
C $ $ $ $ $
(B1+B2+B3+B4)]
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Oklaho
Table 5-12: Operational Costs and Budgets Information Checklist Tab
Operational Costs and Budgets Information Operational Costs
Completed operational budget table.
Completed capital improvements budget table.
Used EPA's Setting Small Drinking Water System Rates for a Sustainable Future document in this process.
Attached documentation used to develop tables or have identified physical and/or electronic location of information
Note: Check each box where statement is true. Note: Check each box where
Table 5-12: Operational Costs and Budgets Information Checklist (Example)
Operational Costs and Budgets Information
✘ Completed operational budget table.
✘ Completed capital improvements budget table.
✘ Used EPA's Setting Small Drinking Water System Rates for a Sustainable Future document in this process.
✘ Attached documentation used to develop tables or have identified physical and/or electronic location of information

Table 6-1: Projected Wastewater Needs To-Do List
System Name
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 6-1: Projected Wastewater Needs To-Do List (Example)
1 Planning and development review H. Jackson 11/10/2013
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 6-2: Population Projections
List selected population projections below for the system service area.
Projected Population
Planning Source for
A Comments
Year Population Projections1
Population
Not Served by System
Served by System
1
U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 2012 Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan Update, etc. 1
U.S. Census Bureau's
Table 6-2: Population Projections (Example)
List selected population projections below for the system service area.
Projected Population
Planning Source for
A Comments
Year Population Projections1
Population
Not Served by System
Served by System
2011 2,150 OCWP 2012 Update
2015 2,268
2020 2,393
2025 2,525
2030 2,663
2035 2,810
2040 2,965
2045 3,128
2050 3,300
1
U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey, 2012 Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan Update, etc.
Table 6-3a: Historical Wastewater Flow and Per Capita Flow Computation Table
Historical Wastewater Flow and Per Capita Flow Computation Historical Wa
Historical Data for Wastewater Flow

per capita Computation
Historical Influent Historical Influent

Year Historical
Wastewater ADF Wastewater ADF per Data Source(s)2
of Record Population
(mgd) capita (mgd)1
Selected Historical Inf. Wastewater ADF per capita (mgd)3 > < Enter this value in Table 6-3b, Column B Selected Inf. W
1
To calculate per capita wastewater flow, divide the historical influent wastewater flow by the corresponding population. Example, using a population of 3,000 1
To calculate per capita w
and a corresponding historical wastewater ADF of 1.0 mgd, the per capita wastewater flow is 0.003 mgd per capita or 333 gpcd (or 1,000,000 gpd/3,000 3,000 and a correspondi
people = 333 gpcd). gpd/3,000 people = 333
2
Sources for average daily flows may be found in Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc.) 2
Sources for average da
3
Select per capita wastewater flow data for use in calculating annual wastewater flow projections in Table 6-3b. 3
Select per capita waste
Table 6-3a: Historicalal Wastewater Flow and Per Capita Flow Computation (Example)
System Name My Wastewater System, My County, Oklahoma
Historicalal Wastewater Flow and Per Capita Flow Computation
Historicalal Data for Wastewater Flow

Historicalal Influent Historicalal Influent

Year Historicalal
Wastewater ADF Wastewater ADF Data Source(s) 3
(mgd) (mgd) per capita 1
2002 1,590 0.242 0.00015
2003 1,687 0.282 0.00017
2004 1,684 0.278 0.00017
2005 1,698 0.290 0.00017
2006 1,702 0.330 0.00019
2007 1,704 0.293 0.00017
2008 1,753 0.289 0.00017
2009 1,820 0.298 0.00016
2010 2,030 0.625 0.00031
2011 2,150 0.669 0.00031
Selected Inf. Wastewater ADF per capita (mgd) 2 > 0.00031 < Enter this value in Table 6-3b, Column B
1To calculate per capita wastewater flow, divide the Historicalal influent wastewater flow by the corresponding population. Example, using a population of
2,150 and a corresponding Historicalal wastewater ADF of 0.669 mgd, the per capita wastewater flow is 0.00031 mgd per capita.
2 Select per capita wastewater flow data for use in calculating annual wastewater flow projections in Table 6-3b.
3 Sources for average daily flows may be found in Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc.)
.242/1590
Table 6-3a: Historical Wastewater Flow and Per Capita Flow Computation (Example)
Historical Wastewater Flow and Per Capita Flow Computation
Historical Data for Wastewater Flow

Historical Influent Historical Influent

Year Historical
Wastewater ADF Wastewater ADF per Data Source(s) 3
(mgd) capita (mgd) 1
2002 1,590 0.242 0.00015
2003 1,687 0.282 0.00017
2004 1,684 0.278 0.00017
2005 1,698 0.290 0.00017
2006 1,702 0.330 0.00019
2007 1,704 0.293 0.00017
2008 1,753 0.289 0.00017
2009 1,820 0.298 0.00016
2010 2,030 0.625 0.00031
2011 2,150 0.667 0.00031
Selected Inf. Wastewater ADF per capita (mgd) 2 > 0.00031 < Enter this value in Table 6-3b, Column B
1
To calculate per capita wastewater flow, divide the historical influent wastewater flow by the corresponding population. Example, using a population of
3,000 and a corresponding historical wastewater ADF of 1.0 mgd, the per capita wastewater flow is 0.003 mgd per capita or 333 gpcd (or 1,000,000
gpd/3,000 people = 333 gpcd).
2
Sources for average daily flows may be found in Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc.)
3
Select per capita wastewater flow data for use in calculating annual wastewater flow projections in Table 6-3b.
.242/1590
Table 6-3b: Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Per Capita Information
System Name
Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Per Capita Information
Projected Wastewater Annual Flow Computation

If any of the values based on Historical
A B data need to be modified for future
Planning C
Projected Selected Historicalal planning, provide an explanation below
Year Projected 3 Annual
Population 1 Influent Wastewater ADF and include values selected for future
per capita (mgd) 2 Influent Wastewater ADF planning.
(mgd)
This value will be used

here to calculate influent
wastewater projections
for each planning year.
1 Use population projections from Table 6-2, Column A.

2 Use the Selected Historical Influent Wastewater ADF per capita data from Table 6-3a
3 To calculate the projected annual wastewater flow, multiply the selected Historical wastewater per capita flow by the corresponding population projection.
(Example, using .333 mgd, the per capita Historical wastewater flow and a corresponding projected population of 3,600, the projected annual wastewater
flow is 1.20 mgd. (or 333.3 gpcd/3,600 people = 1.20 mgd).
Table 6-3: Wastewater Flow Projections (Example)
System Name My Wastewater System, My County, Oklahoma
Table 6-3b Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Per Capita Information

Planning Projected Selected 2 Historicalal C planning, provide an explanation below
Year Population 1 Influent Wastewater ADF Projected 3 Annual and include values selected for future
per capita (mgd) 2 Influent Wastewater ADF planning.
(mgd)
2011 2,150 0.00031 0.667

The value you select will
2015 2,268 0.703
be used here to calculate
influent wastewater
2020 2,393 0.742
projections for each
planning year.
2025 2,525 0.783
2030 2,663 0.826
2035 2,810 0.871
2040 2,965 0.919
2045 3,128 0.970
2050 3,300 1.023
1 Use population projections from Table 6-2, Cloumn A.

2 Use the Selected Historicalal Influent Wastewater ADF per capita data from Table 6-3a
3To calculate the projected annual wastewater flow, multiply the Historicalal selected wastewater per capita flow by the corresponding population
projection. (Example, using a per capita Historicalal wastewater flow of .00031 mgd, and a corresponding projected population of 3,300, the projected
annual wastewater flow is 1.023 mgd.
Table 6-3b: Wastewater Flow Projections (Example)
Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Per Capita Information

Planning
Projected Selected 2 Historicalal C planning, provide an explanation below
Year
Population 1 Influent Wastewater Projected 3 Annual Influent and include values selected for future
ADF per capita (mgd) Wastewater ADF (mgd) planning.
2
2011 2,150 0.00031 0.667

The value you select
2015 2,268 0.703
will be used here to
calculate influent
2020 2,393 0.742
wastewater projections
for each planning year.
2025 2,525 0.783
2030 2,663 0.826
2035 2,810 0.871
2040 2,965 0.919
2045 3,128 0.970
2050 3,300 1.023
1 Use population projections from Table 6-2, Column A.

2 Use the Selected Historical Influent Wastewater ADF per capita data from Table 6-3a
3 To calculate the projected annual wastewater flow, multiply the selected Historical wastewater per capita flow by the corresponding population projection.
(Example, using .333 mgd, the per capita Historical wastewater flow and a corresponding projected population of 3,600, the projected annual wastewater
flow is 1.20 mgd. (or 333.3 gpcd/3,600 people = 1.20 mgd).
308,745,538
Table 6-3c: Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Land Use Information
Note: Use separate copies of this table for each year of wastewater flow projection planning using land use information. Note: Use sep
Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Land Use Information Influent Waste
< Planning Year
Land Use Category Information Unit Information
Typical
Number in
Units per Wastewater Projected Influent
Category Description Service Unit Total Units Data Source(s) 2
Category Flow per Unit Wastewater ADF (gpd)4
Area
(gpd)1
Residential Housing, single
Persons 55
family
Residential Housing, apartment Persons 40
Office Employee 5
Restaurant (including toilet) Customer 9
Hotel Guest 50
Hotel Employee 10
Parking
Shopping Center 2
Space
Shopping Center Employee 10
Theater, indoor Seat 3
Hospital, medical Bed 150
Hospital, medical Employee 10
Rest Home Resident 90
Rest Home Employee 10
School, day, with cafeteria, gym

Student 25
and showers
School, day, with cafeteria Student 15
< gpd
Planning Year > Projected Total
< mgd3
1
Typical values taken from Wastewater Engineering, Treatment Disposal Reuse published by Metcalf & Eddy. Local wastewater flows should be used if available. 1
Typical values taken fro
2
Sources for per capita information (e.g., Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc.): 2
Sources for per capita in
3
Record each planning year's resulting mgd value in "Table 6-3c-1: Summary of Influent Wastewater Flow Projections Using Land Use Information" 3
Record each planning y
4
Total units x Typical wastewater flow per unit 4
Total units x Typical was
Table 6-3c: Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Land Use Information (Example)
Note: Use separate copies of this table for each year of wastewater flow projection planning using land use information.
Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Land Use Information
2011 < Planning Year
Land Use Category Information Unit Information
Typical
Number in Projected Influent
Units per Wastewater
Category Description Service Unit Total Units Wastewater ADF Data Source(s) 2
Category Flow per Unit1
Area (gpd)4
(gpd)
Residential Housing, single
family 800 Persons 2.5 2,000 55 110,000
Residential Housing, apartment 25 Persons 25 625 40 25,000
Office 20 Employee 5 100 5 500
Restaurant (including toilet) 6 Customer 300 1,800 9 16,200
Hotel 2 Guest 65 130 50 6,500
Hotel 2 Employee 12 24 10 240
Parking
Shopping Center 1 Space 200 200 2 400
Shopping Center 1 Employee 25 25 10 250
Theater, indoor 0 Seat 0 0 3 0
Hospital, medical 1 Bed 50 50 150 7,500
Hospital, medical 1 Employee 25 25 10 250
Rest Home 2 Resident 125 250 90 22,500
Rest Home 2 Employee 40 80 10 800
School, day, with cafeteria, gym
and showers
Student 400 400 25
1 10,000
School, day, with cafeteria 3 Student 150 450 15 6,750
206,890 < gpd

Planning Year > 2011 < Projected Total
0.2069 mgd3
1
Typical values taken from Wastewater Engineering, Treatment Disposal Reuse published by Metcalf & Eddy. Local wastewater flows should be used if available.
2
Sources for per capita information (e.g., Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc.):
3
Record each planning year's resulting mgd value in "Table 6-3c-1: Summary of Influent Wastewater Flow Projections Using Land Use Information"
4
Total units x Typical wastewater flow per unit
Table 6-3c-1: Summary of Influent Wastewater Flow Projections Using Land Use Information Table 6-3c-1: Su
Summary of Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Land Use Information Summary of Infl
Projected Influent
Planning
Wastewater ADF Notes
Year
(mgd) 1
1
From Table 6-3c for each planning year. 1
From Table 6-3c for each
Table 6-3c-1: Summary of Influent Wastewater Flow Projections Using Land Use Information (Example)
Summary of Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Land Use Information
Projected Influent
Planning
Wastewater ADF Notes
Year
(mgd) 1
2011 0.20690
1
From Table 6-3c for each planning year.
Table 6-3d: Monthly Distribution of Drinking Water Usage
Note: Use separate copies of this table for each year of monthly distribution pattern calculating . Note: Use sep
Monthly Distribution of Drinking Water Usage Monthly Distr
< Year of Record
Monthly Drinking Monthly

Water Usage Distribution Data Source(s)
(mgd) 1 Pattern 2
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total Annual Usage (mgd)
< Total of Distribution Pattern should sum to 1.00
>
Year of Record > < Minimum Monthly Distributation Pattern 4
1
Information may be taken from metered results or water treatment plant production values. 1
Information may be tak
2
To calculate the monthly distribution pattern, divide the monthly usage by the total annual usage. Note: the sum of the monthly distribution pattern values 2
To calculate the month
should sum to 1 (one). should sum to 1 (one).
3
Sources for drinking water demand information include 2012 OCWP Update, City’s Master Plan, etc. 3
Sources for drinking wa
4
Enter each planning year's Minimum Mohthly Distribution Pattern on Form 6-3e. 4
Enter each planning ye
Note: this method of flow projection is least preferred of the three methods presented. If possible, use one of the previous methods Note: this method of flow
Table 6-3d: Monthly Distribution of Drinking Water Usage (Example)
Note: Use separate copies of this table for each year of monthly distribution pattern calculating .
Monthly Distribution of Drinking Water Usage
2011 < Year of Record
Monthly Drinking Monthly

Water Usage Distribution Data Source(s) 3
(mgd) 1 Pattern 2
January 0.049 0.070
February 0.049 0.070
March 0.049 0.070
April 0.057 0.082
May 0.063 0.090
June 0.070 0.100
July 0.077 0.110
August 0.077 0.110
September 0.063 0.090
October 0.050 0.072
November 0.050 0.072
December 0.045 0.064
Total Annual Usage > 0.699 1.000 < Total of Distribution Pattern should sum to 1.00
Year of Record > 2011 0.064 < Minimum Monthly Distributation Pattern 4
1
Information may be taken from metered results or water treatment plant production values.
2
To calculate the monthly distribution pattern, divide the monthly usage by the total annual usage. Note: the sum of the monthly distribution pattern values
should sum to 1 (one).
3
Sources for drinking water demand information include 2012 OCWP Update, City’s Master Plan, etc.
4
Enter each planning year's Minimum Mohthly Distribution Pattern on Form 6-3e.
Note: this method of flow projection is least preferred of the three methods presented. If possible, use one of the previous methods
Table 6-3e: Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Drinking Water Demand Information Table 6-3e: In
Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Drinking Water Demand Information
Planning Drinking Water Minimum Monthly Ratio of Return Flow Projected Influent
Year Demand (mgd) 1 Distribution Pattern 2 to Demand 3 Wastewater ADF (mgd) 4
1
Use drinking water demand projections. Sources for this information include the 2012 OCWP Update. 1
Use drinking water de
2
Use the minimum monthly distribution pattern value from Table 6-3d. 2
Use the minimum mo
3 This ratio of return flow (or flow returned to the system as wastewater) to demand may be based on Historicalal information. The 2012 OCWP Update used a 3 This ratio of return flo
95 percent ratio of return flow to minimum monthly municipal and industrial water demand. used a 95 percent ratio
4
To calculate the influent wastewater, multiply the drinking water demand by the minimum monthly distribution value by the ratio of return flow to demand. 4
To calculate the influe
Example: if the drinking water demand is 1.0 mgd, the minimum monthly distribution value is 0.05, and the ratio of return flow to demand is 0.95, the
projected wastewater flow is 0.048 mgd (1.0 * 0.05 * 0.95 = 0.048).
Table 6-3e: Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Drinking Water Demand Information (Example)
Influent Wastewater Flow Projections using Drinking Water Demand Information
Planning Drinking Water Minimum Monthly Ratio of Return Flow Projected Influent
Year Demand (mgd) 1 Distribution Pattern 2 to Demand 3 Wastewater ADF (mgd) 4
2003 0.30 0.064 0.95 0.018
2004 0.29 0.064 0.95 0.018
2005 0.31 0.064 0.95 0.019
2006 0.35 0.064 0.95 0.021
2007 0.31 0.064 0.95 0.019
2008 0.30 0.064 0.95 0.018
2009 0.31 0.064 0.95 0.019
2010 0.66 0.064 0.95 0.040
2011 0.70 0.064 0.95 0.043
1
Use drinking water demand projections. Sources for this information include the 2012 OCWP Update.
2
Use the minimum monthly distribution pattern value from Table 6-3d.
3 This ratio of return flow (or flow returned to the system as wastewater) to demand may be based on Historicalal information. The 2012 OCWP Update
used a 95 percent ratio of return flow to minimum monthly municipal and industrial water demand.
4
To calculate the influent wastewater, multiply the drinking water demand by the minimum monthly distribution value by the ratio of return flow to demand.
Example: if the drinking water demand is 1.0 mgd, the minimum monthly distribution value is 0.05, and the ratio of return flow to demand is 0.95, the
projected wastewater flow is 0.048 mgd (1.0 * 0.05 * 0.95 = 0.048).
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Oklahom
Table 6-4a: Wastewater Load Projections - Historical Mass Loads Table
Historical Mass Loads Historical Mass Loads
Inf BOD5 (lb/d) 3

Inf TSS (lb/d) 3
Data Wastewater
Population 1
Period of Record ADF (mgd) 2
ADF 30-Day ADMM MinD MD ADF 30-Day ADMM MinD MD
Inf TP (lb/d) 3 Inf TKN (lb/d) 3

Data Wastewater
Population 1
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
1
Record this information from Table 3-5 ADF: Average daily flow MinD: Minimum day flow 1
Record this information from Table 3-5
2
Record this information from Table 3-6 30-Day: 30-Day Moving Average Flow MD: Maximum day 2
3
Record this information from Table 3-7 ADMM: Average day maximum month 3
Note: Sources for per capita information include Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc. Note: Sources for per capita information in
More information on calculating the requested information can be found in Section 3 and Appendix B of this guide.
MinD – Minimum day conditions, based on 5th percentile value of 3 year Historical record
ADF – Average day conditions, based on average value of 3 year Historical record
ADMM – Average day maximum month (or maximum month) conditions, based on 95th percentile of 30-day moving
average over 3 year Historical record
MD – Maximum day conditions, based on 95th percentile value of 3 year Historical record
Inf – Influent wastewater flow conditions
BOD – Biological oxygen demand
TSS – Total suspended solids
TP – Total phosphorus
TKN – Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Table 6-4a: Wastewater Load Projections - Historical Mass Loads (Example)
Historical Mass Loads
Inf BOD5 (lb/d) 3 Inf TSS (lb/d) 3

Data Wastewater
Population 1
1990 1820
2000 2030
2010 2150
Inf TP (lb/d) 3 Inf TKN (lb/d) 3

Data Wastewater
Population 1
1990 1820
2000 2030
2010 2150
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
1
Record this information from Table 3-5 ADF: Average daily flow MinD: Minimum day flow
2
Record this information from Table 3-6 30-Day: 30-Day Moving Average Flow MD: Maximum day
3
Record this information from Table 3-7 ADMM: Average day maximum month
Note: Sources for per capita information include Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc.
gomills: Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Oklahoma Com
If this tableTable
appears to be
6-4b: Wastewater Load Projections - Historical Mass Loads Per Capita Table 6-4b: Waste
divided among multiple pages,
System Name simply changed the Page Layout System Name
size to Letter size and Landscape
orientation
Historical Mass Loads Per Capita Historical Mass Loads Per C
Inf BOD5 (lb/d per capita) 1 Inf TSS (lb/d per capita)
Data Wastewater
Population
Period of Record ADF (mgd)
Inf TP (lb/d per capita) Inf TKN (lb/d per capita)

Data Wastewater
Population
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
1
To calculate the per capita flow and load
1
To calculate the per capita flow and loads, divide the values in Table 6-4a by the historical population (Table 6-4a). Record these per capita values in Table 6-4b. For example, with
6-4b. For example, with an Inf BOD5 of 54
an Inf BOD5 of 540 lb/d and a population of 3,000, the Inf BOD 5 per capita would be 0.18 lb/d per capita (calculated by dividing 540 by 3,000).
by 3,000).
Note: Sources for per capita information in
Table 6-4b: Wastewater Load Projections - Historical Mass Loads Per Capita (Example)
Historical Mass Loads Per Capita
Inf BOD5 (lb/d per capita) 1 Inf TSS (lb/d per capita)
Data Wastewater
Population
MinD ADF ADMM MD MinD ADF ADMM MD
Jan 1990 - Dec 1990 3,000 0.50 617 1084 922 2214 200 638 584 1393
Inf TP (lb/d per capita) Inf TKN (lb/d per capita)

Data Wastewater
Population
MinD ADF ADMM MD MinD ADF ADMM MD
Jan 1990 - Dec 1990 3,000 0.50 16.7 33.4 41.7 54.2 100.1 166.8 191.8 216.8
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
1
To calculate the per capita flow and loads, divide the values in Table 6-4a by the Historical population (Table 6-4a). Record these per capita values in Table
6-4b. For example, with an Inf BOD5 of 540 lb/d and a population of 3,000, the Inf BOD 5 per capita would be 0.18 lb/d per capita (calculated by dividing 540
by 3,000).
Table 6-4c: Wastewater Load Projections - Selected Historical Mass Loads Per Capita Table 6-4c: W
gomills:
System Name If this table appears to be System Name
divided
Selected Historical among
Mass multiple
Loads Per Capita Selected Historical Mass L
pages, simply changed the
Page Layout size to Letter Inf BOD5 (lb/d per capita) 1 Inf TSS (lb/d per capita) 1
Data Wastewater
size andPopulation
Period of Record Landscape ADF (mgd)
orientation. ADF 30-Day ADMM MinD MD ADF 30-Day ADMM MinD MD
Inf TP (lb/d per capita) 1 Inf TKN (lb/d per capita) 1

Data Wastewater
Population
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
If any of the values based on historical data need to be modified for future planning and include list values selected for future planning provide an If any of the values based on h
explanation below. explanation below.
1
To calculate the per capita flow and loads, divide the values in Table 6-4a by the historical population (Table 6-4a). Record these per capita values in Table 6-4b. For example, with 1
To calculate the per capita flow and loa
an Inf BOD5 of 540 lb/d and a population of 3,000, the Inf BOD 5 per capita would be 0.18 lb/d per capita (calculated by dividing 540 by 3,000). an Inf BOD5 of 540 lb/d and a population
Note: Sources for per capita information include Section 3 of this guide, monthly DMRs, typical values for residential population, etc. Note: Sources for per capita information
Table 6-4c: Wastewater Load Projections - Selected Historical Mass Loads Per Capita (Example)
System Name
Selected Historical Mass Loads Per Capita
Inf BOD5 (lb/d per capita) 1 Inf TSS (lb/d per capita) 1
Data Wastewater
Population

Data Wastewater
Population
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
If any of the values based on historical data need to be modified for future planning and include list values selected for future planning provide an
explanation below.
1
To calculate the per capita flow and loads, divide the values in Table 6-4a by the historical population (Table 6-4a). Record these per capita values in Table 6-4b. For example, with
an Inf BOD5 of 540 lb/d and a population of 3,000, the Inf BOD 5 per capita would be 0.18 lb/d per capita (calculated by dividing 540 by 3,000).
Table 6-4d: Wastewater Load Projections - Projected Flow and Mass Loads Per Capita Table 6-4d: W
Projected Flow and Mass Loads Per Capita
Population Wastewater
Period of Data 1
ADF (mgd) 2

Period of Data 1
ADF (mgd) 2
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
1
Record this information from Table 6-2 1
2
Record this information from Table 6-3 2
3
To complete the Inf BOD5, Inf TSS, Inf TP and Inf TKN, take the projected population and multiply it by the per capita numbers in Table 6-4C. 3
To complete the Inf BOD5, Inf TSS, Inf
Table 6-4d: Wastewater Load Projections - Projected Flow and Mass Loads Per Capita (Example)
System Name Anytown, Oklahoma
Projected Flow and Mass Loads Per Capita
Period of Data 1
ADF (mgd) 2

Period of Data 1
ADF (mgd) 2
Data Source 1
Data Source 2
1
2
3
To complete the Inf BOD5, Inf TSS, Inf TP and Inf TKN, take the projected population and multiply it by the per capita numbers in Table 6-4C.
Table 6-5: Design Flow/Load as it Relates to Facility/Process
gomills:
System Name If this table appears to be divided
among multiple pages, simply changed
Design Flow Type Wastewater Component or Process Type
the Page Layout size to Letter size and
Maximum Day (MD)Landscape
and Peak Hour (PH) Sizing for secondary clarifiers, filters, disinfection processes
orientation
Sizing for all hydraulic elements (examples include pumping,
Peak Hour (PH) screening, weirs) including lift stations located within collection
system
Sizing for all hydraulic elements (examples include pumping,

Minimum Day (MinD)
screening, weirs)
Annual Average Day Flow (ADF) or Maximum Month (ADMM) Design capacity of wastewater treatment plant
Design Load Type Wastewater Component or Process Type
Sizing for biological reactors (BOD5) and nutrient (nitrogen,

Maximum Month (ADMM)
phosphorus, etc.) removal processes
Maximum Day (MD) Sizing for aeration system, solids processing system
Minimum Day (MinD) Check for turn down on aeration system, trickling filter recycle
Table 6-6: Future Permits 1
Future Discharge Permit Notes
Existing Anticipated
Constituent Notes
Permit Limit Future Limit 2
BOD5 (mg/L)
CBOD5 (mg/L)
TSS (mg/L)
pH (s.u.)
DO (mg/L)
SAR
TKN (mg/L)
TP (mg/L)
E. coli Bacteria (number/1000 ml)
Chlorine (mg/L)
Temperature (oF)
1
Talk to DEQ about any upcoming changes that may happen
2
Refer to DEQ 525:656 for anticipated project limits
Table 6-6: Future Permits (Example)
Future Discharge Permit Notes
Existing Anticipated
Constituent Notes
Permit Limit Future Limit
BOD5 (mg/L) 30 20
CBOD5 (mg/L) N/A N/A
TSS (mg/L) 30 20
pH (s.u.) 9-Jun 9-Jun
DO (mg/L) 2 2
SAR
TKN (mg/L) N/A 5 Anticipated 2025-2035
TP (mg/L) - 0.5 Anticipated 2025-2035
E. coli Bacteria (number/1000 ml) 200/400 200/400
Chlorine (mg/L) N/A N/A
Temperature (oF) N/A N/A

Table 7-1: Capacity Analysis To-Do List
System Name
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 7-1: Capacity Analysis To-Do List (Example)
System Name
1 Investigate capacity and pump condition/flow J. Smith 2011-2013
2 Meter upstream locations from pump stations J. Smith 2011-2013
10
11
12
13
14
15
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Water Supply Planning Guide Ok
Table 7-2: Wastewater System Capacity Challenges
System Name System N
List specified year System Capacity Challenges List spe

and known data for that year below. (For the specified year, identify any concerns in meeting projected demands.) and known data
List collection system operation or capacity concerns.

Year1 1
Discharge Permit
2
Limits2
Selected Population List treatment ability to meet discharge requirements concerns.

3
Projection3
Selected Wastewater
4
Flow Projection4
List treatment capacity concerns.
Selected Wastewater
5
Load Projection5
Collection System
Capacity
6
(existing and
planned projects)6 List aging infrastructure concerns.
Treatment System
Capacity
7
(existing and
planned projects)7
1. Include as many years as appropriate, using a

List receiving water quality concerns.
separate form for each year. Selection of years may
be based on permitted schedule of use, planned
water supply improvements, dates for demand
and/or population projections, etc. 1. Include as many y
2. See your system's 208 WLA. a separate form for e
3. Use Table 6-2. years may be based
4. List projections selected in Section 6. use, planned water s
5. List projections selected in Section 6. for demand and/or p
2. Acre Feet per Yea
about 325,850 gallon
6. List capacity of major wastewater collection
List future effluent limits concerns. 3. List capacity of ma
system components such as lift stations, components such as
interceptors, collection lines, etc. The system may stations, transmissio
choose to show the limiting capacity (for example if choose to show the
the lift system has pumping capacity of 2 mgd but system has groundw
only 1 mgd of transmission capacity, the limiting mgd but only 3 mgd
capacity for getting wastewater to the treatment the limiting capacity
plant is the transmission capacity) or identify system is the transm
capacity for all components. Please include capacity for all comp
additional notes as appropriate. additional notes as a
Information on existing equipment may have been 4. List wastewater flo
recorded in Section 4 as part of the system’s Wastewater Facilities Inventory. Information on planned projects may have been recorded in Section 5. 5. List wastewater lo
7. List capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities. The system may choose to show either limiting capacity or identify capacity for all major components. 6. List capacity of m
Information on existing facilities may have been recorded in Section 4 as part of the Wastewater Facilities Inventory. Information on planned projects may show the limiting cap
have been recorded in Section 5 for getting wastewat
appropriate. Informa
Information on plann
7. List capacity of th
components. Informa
planned projects ma
8. As mentioned in t
Examples of concern
enough treatment pr
Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Water Supply Planning Guide
Table 7-2: Wastewater System Capacity Challenges (Example)
List specified year System Capacity Challenges

8
and known data for that year below. (For the specified year, identify any concerns in meeting projected demands.)
List collection system operation or capacity concerns.

Year 2013
Some system blockages with minor overflows
Discharge Permit
Limits
Selected Population List treatment ability to meet discharge requirements concerns.

Projection Most of the time the system is adequate
Selected Wastewater
Flow Projection
List treatment capacity concerns.
Selected Wastewater
Load Projection
Collection System
Capacity
(existing and
planned projects) List aging infrastructure concerns.
Pumps are getting old.
Treatment System
Capacity
(existing and
planned projects)
List receiving water quality concerns.
1. Include as many years as appropriate, using

a separate form for each year. Selection of
years may be based on permitted schedule of
use, planned water supply improvements, dates
for demand and/or population projections, etc.
2. Acre Feet per Year. One acre foot (AF) is
about 325,850 gallons of water.
3. List capacity of major raw water system List future effluent limits concerns.
components such as wells, well fields, pump
stations, transmission lines, etc. You may
choose to show the limiting capacity (e.g., if the
system has groundwater pumping capacity of 8
mgd but only 3 mgd of transmission capacity,
the limiting capacity for getting water to your
system is the transmission capacity) or identify
capacity for all components. Please include
additional notes as appropriate.
4. List wastewater flow projections selected in Section 6.
5. List wastewater load projections selected in Section 6.
6. List capacity of major wastewater collection system components such as lift stations, interceptors, collection lines, etc. The system may chose to
show the limiting capacity (for example if the lift system has pumping capacity of 2 mgd but only 1 mgd of transmission capacity, the limiting capacity
for getting wastewater to the treatment plant is the transmission capacity)or identify capacity for all components. Please include additional notes as
appropriate. Information on existing equipment may have been recorded in Section 4 as part of the system’s Wastewater Facilities Inventory.
Information on planned projects may have been recorded in Section 5
7. List capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities. The system may choose to show either limiting capacity or identify capacity for all major
components. Information on existing facilities may have been recorded in Section 4 as part of the Wastewater Facilities Inventory. Information on
planned projects may have been recorded in Section 5.
8. As mentioned in the text, the purpose of this table is not to determine the exact amount of shortage or excess, but to facilitate internal discussions.
Examples of concerns are: not enough transmission capacity for peak flows, not enough treatment capacity to handle future wastewater flows, not
enough treatment processes to treat existing loads or to meet future water quality limits, aging infrastructure unable to handle existing flows, etc.
Table 7-3: System Capacity Analysis
System Name
Describe below system capacity concerns indentified in Table 7-2. Supplemental Information Source(s)1
Describe below any regional strategies identified to address these concerns. Supplemental Information Source(s)1
If no regional strategies were identified to address these concerns, explain below. Supplemental Information Source(s)
List below the most significant concerns and rank them in order of importance.
1
OCWP Regional Reports (available at www.owrb.ok.gov/ocwp) specific to your area may be helpful.
Table 7-3: System Capacity Analysis (Example)
System Name
Describe below system capacity concerns indentified in Table 7-2. Supplemental Information Source(s)1
Pump run time by operator. Odor at plant in summer months None known
Describe below any regional strategies identified to address these concerns. Supplemental Information Source(s)1
None yet OCWP Regional Reports
If no regional strategies were identified to address these concerns, explain below. Supplemental Information Source(s)
Continue to monitor system.
List below the most significant concerns and rank them in order of importance.
Meeting treatment regulations quickly, eliminating overflows, future nutrient limits.

1
OCWP Regional Reports (available at www.owrb.ok.gov/ocwp) specific to your area may be helpful.
Table 8-1: Preliminary Alternatives To-Do List
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
Table 8-1: Preliminary Alternatives To-Do List (Example)
Investigate treatment alternatives for Nitrogen and

J. Smith 3/14/2014
phosphorus removal
Talk with Oklahoma Water Resources Board and

Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality J. Smith 7/6/2014
about technical and financial resources available.
Update collection system map J.Smith 2/1/2014

Table 8-2: Wastewater Management Challenges and Alternatives
Factors to Consider When Developing Alternatives
Service Area
Modification
• Are there plans to expand or modify the existing service area? Are there plans to add new customers or bulk service treatment?
• Does consolidation with other facilities (in the service area or geographic region) make sense for providing overall treatment?
• Would connecting to nearby systems for emergency or other supply be feasible?
• What is the anticipated wastewater flow based upon residential and commercial connections? How does the anticipated flow
Inflow & infiltration
differ from actual dry-weather and wet-weather flows?

• Do pump stations or the plant experience significant variations in flow throughout the day and following wet-weather events?
reduction
• What is the overall condition of the collection and transmission system and are repairs able to be readily made?
• Is the system configured in such a way as to be able to distinguish the areas with higher peaking factors (and potentially
higher I/I)?
• Will reduction in I/I make a positive impact on overall system capacity or reduce system overflows?
• Can high efficiency pumps be installed?
Piping & transmission
• Are there known bottlenecks in the system?

• Are there areas of future potential development that are served by pipes and pump stations of limited capacity?
• Can some pipes be re-routed to relieve areas that have capacity constraints?
• Are some pump stations impacting the system due to limited capacity or equipment malfunction?
• Is it feasible to add in-system storage or change pump system operations to more effectively use wet-wells for storage?
• Will I/I reduction eliminate capacity problems in the system?
• Can high efficiency pumps be installed?
Capacity increase
• Does the influent flow following a wet-weather event result in hydraulic capacity limitations at the treatment plant? Would
on-plant storage eliminate this impact?
• Are there treatment unit processes that are capacity limited resulting in a lower overall treatment plant capacity?
• Does the condition of any unit process impact the overall capacity of treatment (i.e. bar screens in poor condition limit ability to
Treatment
pass inflow flow through preliminary treatment unit)?

• Is the overall plant capacity adequate to treat current and future loads based upon permit effluent limits?
• Do potential future effluent limits result in the plant being undersized (i.e. nutrient limits, anticipated change in TSS or BOD5
limits, etc.)?
• Are there anticipated changes in the customer base that will result in a change in flow to the plant (characterization or volume)?
• Is there a likely change in sludge disposal that will result in the need for increased treatment (i.e. moving to Class B or Class A
solids or change in disposal location)?
• Does projected solids generation exceed processing or disposal capacity?
• Will the current treatment processes allow compliance with the existing permit? Will the current process provide adequate
Treatment Type
treatment for compliance with anticipated future permit limits?

• Is the current treatment technology reasonable for the anticipated flows and loads?
• Is the current plant operating effectively and resulting in permit compliance? Would changes in the process help with permit
compliance?
• Should alternative processes be considered to provide more effective and efficient treatment?
• Does the existing plant and process unit configuration allow for easy upgrade or process change?
Management
• Are there other potential methods of effluent disposal? What regulatory steps will be required to implement an alternative
Effluent
disposal plan?
• Is the effluent disposal method sized consistent with the plant capacity or will changes be required.
• Will new regulations or permit changes make the current method of effluent disposal possible?
• Is wastewater reuse a possibility? Are there customers available? Are there potential industrial customers for reuse?
• Endangered species or their habitat nearby? (common for OK – Least Tern, American Burying Beetle, Whooping Crane,
Considerations
Environmental
Leopard Darter)
• Near a High Quality Water, Scenic River, Nutrient Limited Watershed, or other sensitive areas?
• TMDL for the watershed? What constituent(s)?
• Will project involve undeveloped property?
• Near natural or archeological landmarks?
• Project in the floodway or floodplain?
• Substantive increase in volume or loading of pollutants?
Table 8-3: Evaluation and Implementation of Water and Energy Conservation Efforts
System Name
Planning Methodology Yes No
Project is a comprehensive planning effort that includes other public and/or private sector organizations
Project alternatives analysis explores the most cost-effective solution at a regional level
Project incorporates at least one planning methodology1
Rate structures will support ongoing operations and maintenance for this project
Energy Efficiency Yes No
Facility has performed a professional energy audit
Facility has developed an Energy Conservation Plan
Equipment is properly maintained, operating as close to nameplate voltage as practicable, and the connection
on switches on all major power-driven equipment is checked at least annually
Facility uses variable frequency drives to improve pump efficiency
Pump operations are automated
Facility uses variable and multiple staged single-speed blowers
Facility uses digester gas to fuel engine-driven blowers
Facility uses two-speed mechanical aerators where applicable
Facility implements continuous DO monitoring
Facility uses digester gas to fuel engine-driven blowers
Automated aeration control systems are installed
Facility uses natural light to the greatest extent possible
Facility uses programmable thermostats
Facility has assessed building insulation R-values and sealed leaks
Water Efficiency Yes No
Facility has developed a Water Conservation Program
Facility has taken measures to implement pressure management controls throughout collection system
Facility utilizes leak detection equipment and protocols to address leaks, collapses, and I/I issues
Facility has developed and employed mechanisms to recycled gray water
Facility produces Class II treated effluent for agricultural/industrial/fire protection/groundwater recharge, etc.
Facility produces Class I treated effluent used for landscape irrigation, fire protection, or groundwater
recharge
System design allows for water reuse treatment and distribution
Project uses stormwater best management practices, exceeding permit requirements
System planning involved consultation with potential water reuse and land application customers
Project planning involved consultation with potential water reuse customers
Planning methodologies include: Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Fix-it First Methodology, Asset Management Plan, Watershed Management Plan,
1
Nutrient Management Plan, and/or Open Space Preservation Plan

Table 8-3: Influent Wastewater Challenges and Preleminary Alternatives
System Name
Implementation
Influent Wastewater Challenges Preliminary Alternatives1
Time Frame
Notes
1
See Appendices C and D.
Table 8-4: Influent Wastewater Challenges and Preliminary Alternatives
System Name
Implementation
Influent Wastewater Challenges Preliminary Alternatives
Time Frame
Notes
Table 8-3: Influent Wastewater Challenges and Preleminary Alternatives (Example)
Implementation
Influent Wastewater Challenges Preliminary Alternatives1
Time Frame
High BOD and TSS IFAS, Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor 9/30/2014
High BOD and TSS Additional aeration basin 12/20/2014
High BOD and TSS Add a roughing trickling filter 9/8/2015
Notes
Due to a new meat processing plant
1
See Appendices C and D.
Table 8-5: Wastewater Collection Challenges and Preliminary Alternatives
System Name
Implementation
Wastewater Collection Challenges Preliminary Alternatives
Time Frame
Notes
Table 8-6: Wastewater Treatment Challenges and Preliminary Alternatives
System Name
Implementation
Wastewater Treatment Challenges Preliminary Alternatives
Time Frame
Notes
Table 8-7: Wastewater Effluent Disposal/Reuse Challenges and Preliminary Alternatives
System Name
Implementation
Wastewater Effluent Disposal/Reuse Challenges Preliminary Alternatives
Time Frame
Notes
Table 8-8: Sludge Management Challenges and Preliminary Alternatives
System Name
Implementation
Sludge Management Challenges Preliminary Alternatives
Time Frame
Notes
Table 8-9: Conceptual Alternatives
Conceptual Conceptual Alternative Will this alternative be

Alternative Name Description given further consideration?
Will be considered further

This alternative involves continued ✘ Will not be considered further (explain decision below)
operation of the existing wastewater
system without modifications to
1 No Action 1
collection, transmission, treatment,
effluent disposal, or residuals
management.

Will not be considered further (explain decision below)
2 2

3 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7
Table 8-8: Conceptual Alternatives (Example)
Conceptual
Conceptual Alternative Will this alternative be
Alternative
Description given further consideration?
Name
✘ Will be considered further
This alternative involves continued Will not be considered further (explain decision below)
operation of the existing wastewater
system without modifications to
No Action
collection, transmission, treatment,
effluent disposal, or residuals
management.
Convert existing aeration basins to ✘ Will be considered further

provide anaerobic and anoxic zones Will not be considered further (explain decision below)
for biological phosphorus and
BNR nitrogen removal
Add chemical for nutrient removal, ✘ Will be considered further

may require clarifier upgrade Will not be considered further (explain decision below)
Chemicals
Send flow to South Town’s ✘ Will be considered further

wastewater plant Will not be considered further (explain decision below)
Pump Station



Table 8-10: Project Prioritization Matrix
Important Not Important

Urgent
Not Urgent
Table 8-11: Project Prioritization With Timeline Matrix
Funding Funding
Critical Non-Critical
Sources Sources
Within
1 Year
1 to 3 Years
3 to 5 Years
5 to 10
Years
10 to 25
Years
Beyond 25
Years
Table 9-1: Evaluate Alternatives To-Do List
System Name
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 9-1: Evaluate Alternatives To-Do List (Example)
Learn more about operating costs associated

1 J. Smith and Engineering Consultant 2011-2012
with alternatives
H. Sparks Last quarter of 2012

2 Talk to South Town about possible connection
J. Smith and Engineering Consultant 2012-2013

3 Review process options with vendors
J.Smith Last quarter of 2012

4 Get chemical costs for addition
N. Drew 2012-2013
5 Look at impacts to residuals and disposal site
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 9-2 (page 1 of 2): Example Primary and Secondary Objectives
gomills:
IfObjective Name
this table appears to be Objective Description Secondary Objectives Performance Measure (units)
divided among multiple pages,
simply changed the Page Layout Provide system redundancy (equipment, Number of trains and N redundancy
treatment trains) to keep system For N: 0=none, 1=single equipment back-up, 2=full equipment
size to Letter size and operating during component failure back-up
Landscape
orientation
Use of proven technology in alternative
Use proven technology for treatment Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents least proven technology
Minimize risk of overflows in and 5 represents most proven
collection system and ensure ability to
treat organic loads with variable
1 Improve Reliability wastewater flows. Each alternative Ability to change flow path through valve, gate or piping
will be evaluated based on system Maximize flexibility in operations (flow control
redundancy, ramifications of system path changes, ability to change process) Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents least flexibility and 5
failure, and use of proven technology. represents most flexibility
Susceptibility to pump failure or treatment problems resulting

Reliability of lift stations and collection in violations to discharge permit
system. Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most impact from failure
and 5 represents least impact
Capital construction cost for improvements

Manage capital costs Qualitative 1-5 for initial screening where 1 represents highest
cost and 5 represents lowest cost
This objective evaluates both capital

and life cycle costs of each Degree to which improvements can be phased
Phase implementation to defer capital
2 Minimize Cost alternative. Ease of phasing Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents few or no phasing and 5
costs
improvements while deferring capital represents the most phasing opportunities
costs is also assessed.
20-year –public sewer cost for improvements

Manage life-cycle costs Qualitative 1-5 for initial screening where 1 represents highest
cost and 5 represents lowest cost
Perceived construction impacts

Minimize construction impacts to
Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most impact and 5
environmentally sensitive areas
represents least impact
This objective will evaluate permit

Minimize
compliance of each alternative. This Perceived reduction in carbon footprint or energy demand
environmental
3 objective also will evaluate the ability Increase energy efficiency Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents the least reduction in
impacts/incorporate
to minimize construction impacts to carbon footprint and 5 represents the most reduction
sustainability
environmentally sensitive areas.
This objective will evaluate permit
Minimize
compliance of each alternative. This
environmental
3 objective also will evaluate the ability
impacts/incorporate
to minimize construction impacts to
sustainability
environmentally sensitive areas.
Ease of maintaining compliance

Maintain compliance with permit limits Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most difficult to maintain
compliance and 5 represents least difficult
Table 9-2 (page 2 of 2): Example Primary and Secondary Objectives
Objective Name Objective Description Secondary Objectives Performance Measure (units)
Match system with existing operational Staff training requirements

procedures and capabilities, experience Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most training required and
of staff 5 represents least training required
This objective will evaluate similarity
to existing operational procedures
Operability and Degree of overall simplification of O&M
and capabilities, compatibility with
4 integration with Reduce system complexity Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most complex O&M and 5
staff experience, system complexity,
existing facilities represents least complex O&M
and complexity of individual unit
processes or system components.
Degree of simplification of process operations
Reduce complexity of individual unit
Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most complex and 5
processes or system components
represents least complex
Reduction in overall maintenance impacts and individual

Reduce/simplify overall maintenance equipment maintenance requirements
requirements Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most maintenance and 5
This objective will evaluate the represents least maintenance
5 Maintainability maintenance requirements of each
alternative.
Ease with which improvements can be maintained
Increase ease of maintaining facilities
Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most complex and 5
and equipment
represents least complex
Level of system disturbance

Minimize disruption to existing system
Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most disruption and 5
This objective will measure the ease during construction
represents least disruption
of constructing each alternative,
6 Constructability
including the level of disruption to the
existing system during construction. Perceived difficulty of actual construction, Perceived ease of construction
considering access, tie-ins and physical Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most difficult construction
limitations and 5 represents least difficult construction
Perceived public safety

Minimize handling hazardous substances
Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents most risk and 5 represents
This objective will assess the public and storage quantity of chemicals onsite
least risk
acceptability of each alternative by
7 Public Acceptance
evaluating perceived public safety
and discharge water quality. Provide collection and wastewater Perceived level of receiving water quality
treatment that is affordable and maintains Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents lower effluent quality and 5
receiving water quality. represents higher effluent quality
Ability to implement required Implementation schedule

Timely
8 improvements with minimal technical None Qualitative 1-5 where 1 represents the longest implementation
Implementation
and regulatory difficulty time and 5 represents the shortest
This section describes a method called paired comparisons, which can be used to weight each of the objectives. Similar to the
brainstorming session in Section 8, it may be helpful to have several stakeholders in the organization participate.
As the name suggests, essentially the system is comparing two objectives at a time to determine which of the pair is more important.
For example, is objective 1 or 2 more important? Is objective 1 or 3 more important? Using the example objectives in Table 9-2, the
sample chart below was developed. Each box in the chart compares 2 objectives. There is no priority implied in the objective's
numbering assignment - the numbers simply facilitate the exercise. Each objective will be compared to each of the other objectives
selected for use in the chart. For this sample (see Example A ), we have chosen to compare four objectives, however the number of
objectives used and the issues addressed should be based on their relevance to the individual utility.
Once the objectives have been determined and selections have been made for comparison, the participant would:
1. Determine which objective (representatied by numbers) in each box is more important (excluding all other objectives) and circle
that number. For example, in the first box the objective "Improved Reliability" is compared to "Minimize Cost". The option, "Minimize
Cost" was elected as the more important objective of the two. Continue this process for all 6 boxes.
2. Tally the number of times each objective was selected (circled). Notice that objective #2, "Minimize Costs" was circled three times
in example A.
3. Divide the number of times each objective was selected by the total number of selections (6) among all the objectives to
determine the objective weighting. Multiply the results by 100 to determine the weighting in percent. The total percentage should be
near 100 (rounding considered). For example, since objective #2, "Minimize Costs" was selected a total of 3 times in the chart
among all comparisons and the total number of selections (circles) in the chart is 6, therefore the result is: 3 divided by 6 = .50 x 100
= 50%.

Table 9-3a: Sample Objective Weighting using Four Example Objectives
gomills:
Sample Objective Weighting using Four Example Objectives If this table appears to be
Objective's assigned number > 1 2 3 4
divided among multiple
pages, simply changed
Operability and the Page Layout size to
Name of selected objective > Improve Reliability Minimize Cost Integration with
Existing Facilities
Public Acceptance Letter size and Portrait
orientation
Total number of times objective was
1 2 2 1
selected >
Total number of possible choices > 6 6 6 6
Weight in percentage > 17% 33% 33% 17%
Example A- Comparing Four Objectives

If multiple stakeholders are participating in the exercise, gather the completed weighting grid from each participant then total the
number of times each objective is chosen by all the participants and divide by the number of squares in all the grids combined.
In the following sample, we presume 3 participants are considering 6 objectives which results in 15 squares or possible choices
each (see Example B) the number used for weighting would be 45, (3 x 15 = 45). Therefore, since objective #2 was selected a total
of 7 times, (7 divided by 45 = .1555 x 100 = 15.55) would result in a weighted value of 16% for this objective.

Table 9-3b: Sample Objective Weighting using Six Example Objectives
Sample Objective Weighting using Six Example Objectives with Three Participants
Objective's assigned number > 1 2 3 4 5 6
Operability and
Name of selected objective > Improve Reliability Integration with Maintainability Constructability Public Acceptance Timely Implementation
Current System

9 7 5 7 8 9
selected >
Total number of possible selections

45 45 45 45 45 45
from all participants >
Weight in percentage > 20 16 11 16 18 20
Example B - Three Participants Comparing Six Objectives
Sample Tally Sheet for Multiple Participants

Participant 1 Participant 2 Participant 3 Total number of times the
Objective
Selections Selections Selections objective was selected
1 3 4 2 9
2 3 1 3 7
3 0 3 2 5
4 2 3 2 7
5 3 2 3 8
6 4 2 3 9
Table 9-3: Weighting of System Objectives
System Name
Paired Comparison Method for Weighting Objectives (Use additional forms for more objective comparisons)
Objective's assigned number >
Name of selected objective >

selected >
Total number of possible selections >

(Total from all participants if
applicable)
Weight in percentage >

gomills:
Table 9-4: Alternative Cost Rating Tableappears
If this table 9-5: Alternative
to be Timeline Rating
Cost Range 1 Alternative Rating 2 divided among
Time for multiple 1
Implementation Alternative Rating 2
pages, simply changed the
$5,001 to $25,000 5 Page
LessLayout
than 1 size
year to Letter size 5
and Portrait orientation
$25,001 to $100,000 4 1 to 3 years 4
$25,001 to $100,000 3 3 to 5 years 3
$100,001 to $500,000 2 5 to 10 years 2
Greater than $500,000 1 More than 10 years 1
1
The cost range should reflect the relative cost differences between the alternatives. For example, if all projects have estimated costs of less than $25,000,
then $5,000 cost windows may be used to better distinguish between the projects.
2
Note that the higher ranking indicates a lower cost.
Table 9-6: Sample Rating Table with Scores
Objective Sub-objective Alternative 1 Alternative 2
Relative Alternative Sub-Objective Alternative Sub-Objective

Weight Objective Sub-Objective
Weight Rating Score Rating Score
### Improve 25% Provide system 0 0 1 0.0425
Reliability redundancy (equipment,
treatment trains) to keep
system operating during
component failure
25% Reduce ramifications of 1 0.0425 3 0.1275
failure of all or part of
system
25% Use proven technology for 3 0.1275 3 0.1275
treatment
25% Maximize flexibility in 2 0.085 4 0.17

operations (flow path
changes, ability to change
process)
33% Minimize 33% Manage capital costs 5 0.5445 3 0.3267
Cost
33% Phase implementation to 5 0.5445 3 0.3267
defer capital costs
34% Manage life-cycle costs 5 0.561 3 0.3366

33% Operability 33% Match system with existing 5 0.5445 3 0.3267
and operational procedures
integration and capabilities,
with existing experience of staff
facilities
34% Reduce system complexity 3 0.3366 3 0.3366
33% Reduce complexity of 3 0.3267 3 0.3267
individual unit processes
or system components
17% Public 50% Minimize handling 3 0.255 3 0.255

Acceptance hazardous substances and
storage quantity of
chemicals onsite
50% Provide collection and 1 0.085 1 0.085
wastewater treatment that
is affordable and maintains
receiving water quality.
Alternative Score: 3.4528 2.7875

Table 10-1: Preparing an Engineering Report To-Do List
System Name
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table 10-1: Preparing an Engineering Report To-Do List (Example)
System Name Any Town, Oklahoma
1 WWTP influent flow date smith 2015
2 WWTP units maintance log david 2015
3 WWTP permit Violations smith 2015
10
11
12
13
14
15

Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Table 2-1: Oklahoma Secondary Treatment Standards

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide Table 2-1: Oklahoma Secondary Treatment Standards

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Oklahoma Comprehensive Water Plan - Public Wastewater Utility Planning Guide

Table 2-1: Oklahoma Secondary Treatment Standards 1

● Reserved for potable reuse

● All uses in Categories 3, 4 and 5

● All uses in Categories 4 and 5

● Irrigation of livestock pasture

● All uses in Category 5

● Soil compaction and similar construction activities

● Restricted access pasture irrigation for range cattle

System Name System Name

Task Person Responsible Target Completion Date

System Name Any Town Oklahoma

System Name System Name

Service area map(s) and facility diagram are attached.

Physical Location Electronic Location

Identified key facilities on service area map.

Attached site maps and treatment system schematics.

Identified future service area changes.

Identified known environmental or cultural areas.

State below any Information or assistance needed to finalize incomplete task(s).

System Name Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)

✘ Service area map(s) and facility diagram are attached.

Physical Location Electronic Location

✘ Identified key facilities on service area map.

✘ Attached site maps and treatment system schematics.

✘ Identified future service area changes.

Identified known environmental or cultural areas.

State below any Information or assistance needed to finalize incomplete task(s).

Note: Check each box where statement is true.

System Name System Name

Type of Treatment Process 1

System has discharge Location

Historical Upgrades Date Completed

Identify all upgrades to

Historical Permit Changes Date of Change

Identify all permit changes

Identify correspondence with

Identify all environmental

System Name Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)

Year Built 1978

Type of Treatment Process 1 Mechanical

Additional secondary clarifier installed, Clarifier number 1 rehabbed 2009

Bypass channel installed next to influent channel 2006

Installed parshall flume before aeration basin and replaced flow

Historical Permit Changes Date of Change

OPDES renewal 2007

OPDES renewal 2011

Identify all permit changes

Identify correspondence with

Identify all environmental

System Name System Name

Year Permitted Use (AFY) Comments Year

Year Change in Treatment Process Year

Year Change in Influent Strength or Flows Year

System Name Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)

If the permit includes a schedule of use, enter information below.

Year Permitted Use (AFY) Comments

2012 2 for land application

Year Change in Treatment Process

2006 Converted to UV so there are no chlorine residual impacts

Year Change in Influent Strength or Flows

Historical Population Data

System Name Any Town Oklahoma (ATO)