Professional Documents
Culture Documents
“Philosophy [nature] is written in that great book which ever is before our eyes — I mean the
universe — but we cannot understand it if we do not first learn the language and grasp the
symbols in which it is written. The book is written in mathematical language, and the symbols
are triangles, circles and other geometrical figures, without whose help it is impossible to
comprehend a single word of it; without which one wanders in vain through a dark labyrinth.”
— Galileo Galilei
Blessed is the man who finds wisdom, the man who gains understanding,
for she is more profitable than silver and yields better returns than gold.
She is more precious than rubies; nothing you desire can compare with her.
Long life is in her right hand; in her left hand are riches and honor.
Her ways are pleasant ways, and all her paths are peace.
She is a tree of life to those who embrace her; those who lay hold of her will be blessed.
By wisdom the LORD laid the earth’s foundations, by understanding he set the heavens in
place; by his knowledge the deeps were divided, and the clouds let drop the dew.
— The Bible, Proverbs 3: 13-20
“That which is Below corresponds to that which is Above, and that which is Above, corresponds
to that which is Below, to accomplish the miracles of the One Thing”
— Hermes Trismegistus
“A tradition which has been credited by many learned men over the centuries is that the ancients
encoded their knowledge of the world in the dimensions of their sacred monuments.” — John
Michell
“If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the
universe.” — Nicola Tesla
Note: Don’t miss this important video “Secrets in Plain Site” at the end of this
post.
A simple number pattern, known as the Fibonacci Series, sits at the heart of the marvelous
architecture and patterns of life and growth.
These few equations are the “seeds” of God’s “Grand Design” ( God’s “fingerprint”):
Pi = (6/5) * phi 2
where
e – is Euler’s number, the base of natural logarithms
i – is the imaginary unit, which satisfies i = sqrt(-1)
2
A poll of readers conducted by The Mathematical Intelligencer magazine named Euler’s identity
as the “most beautiful theorem in mathematics”. Another poll of readers that was conducted
by Physics World magazine, in 2004, chose Euler’s identity tied with Maxwell’s
equations (of electromagnetism) as the “greatest equation ever” — Wikipedia
A simple number pattern, known as the Fibonacci Series, sits at the heart of the marvelous
architecture and patterns of life and growth.
Pi and phi
Pi = (6/5) * phi 2
2 * Pi = (360/150) * phi 2
Pi – phi = 0.5236 2
3:6:9
“If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the
universe.” –-N.Tesla
Perhaps Tesla had in mind another thing altogether. It basically boiled down to
energy/field/consciousness, which equates in to electricity/magnetism/consciousness, that made
up Trinity. Energy is your divine spark, and field is the area you exist within. The 2 things that
allow consciousness to isolate itself is electricity and magnetism. NOTHING in the physical
universe exists outside energy and field…only then can you have consciousness reside inside a
material existence.
3:6:9 … Perhaps these numbers were intentionally expressed by the pyramids of Giza…? There
are 9 pyramids on the Giza plateau: 3 large pyramids and 6 small “satellite” pyramids.
Also, the design of the Second (Khafre) Pyramid of Giza is based on ratio 9:6.
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 4, 3, 7, 1, 8, 9, 8, 8, 7, 6, 4, 1, 5, 6, 2, 8, 1, 9
If you take the first 12 digits and add them to the second twelve digits and apply numeric
reduction to the result, you find that they all have a value of 9.
1 12 numbers:
st
1 1 2 3 5 8 4 3 7 1 8 9
2 12 numbers:
nd
8 8 7 6 4 1 5 6 2 8 1 9
Numeric reduction – Add rows 1 and 2: 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 18
Final numeric reduction–Add digits of result: 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
This pattern was contributed both by Joseph Turbeville and then again by a mathematician by
the name of Jain.
Let’s double the number 1 and found out what pattern we get.
1 1
2 2
4 4
8 8
16 7 (1+6=7)
32 5 (3+2=5)
64 1 (6+4=10, 1+0=1)
128 2 (1+2+8=11, 1+1=2)
256 4 (2+5+6=13, 1+3=4)
512 8 (5+1+2=8)
1024 7 (1+0+2+4=7)
2048 5 (2+0=4+8=14, 1+4=5)
3
6
12 (1+2=3)
24 (2+4=6)
48 (4+8=12, 1+2=3)
96 (9+6=15, 1+5=6)
3 and 6’s are constantly oscillating back and forth between each other in the doubling and
halving scheme.
So 9 is the unchanging, unwavering number that never really loses its true identity, even
though it is undergoing a constant state changing.
Watch Marko Rodins videos on YouTube and just try to understand what he’s saying. Basically
he’s found the math to the real “God Particle” or particle of Spirit, known as Brahman in the
Vedas, and he has shown how it can be observed, but not with physical instruments.
Significant Numbers
Besides sacred Tetractys, these numbers are considered very important in Nature:
The Number 33
A normal human spine has 33 vertebrae when the bones that form the coccyx are counted
individually
33 is, according to the Newton scale, the temperature at which water boils
The atomic number of arsenic
The divine name Elohim appears 33 times in the story of creation in the opening chapters of
Genesis
Jesus’s age when he was crucified in 33 A.D.
Jesus performed 33 recorded miracles
33 is not only a numerical representation of “the Star of David,” but also the numerical equivalent
of AMEN: 1+13+5+14=33
the highest degree in the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.
The Number 81
Plato’s Number
Plato’s number is a number enigmatically referred to by Plato in his dialogue the Republic. There
is no real agreement neither about the meaning nor about the value of the number. It has been
called also the ‘Geometrical number’ or the ‘Nuptial number’ (the Number of the Bride’’),and
designated by various other means. Comments on this passage have appeared ever since it has
been written. Without any consensus in the argumentation 216 is a most frequently proposed
value for it, but 3600 or 12960000 are also commonly considered.
Most interpretators argue that the value of Plato’s number is 216 because it is the cube of 6 i.e.
6^3=216 which is remarkable for being also a sum of the cubes for the Pythagorean triple
3,4,and 5
216 = 6 =3 +4 +5
3 3 3 3
–––
There are many more – please submit your favorite sacred number (make a comment)
Ancient Knowledge
Truly it has been said that there is nothing new under the sun,
for knowledge is revealed and is submerged again, even as a nation rises and falls.
Here is a system, tested throughout the ages, but lost again and again by ignorance or
prejudice,
in the same way that great nations have risen and fallen
and been lost to history beneath the desert sands and in the ocean depths.
–Paracelsus
Ancient cultures knew about sacred geometry reflected in nature and derived their
individual measures of length from it. Many ancient writings suggest that this knowledge
was given to mankind by god(s). The ‘Gods’ of certain cultures could be early post-flood
founders a few generations after Noah. In Egypt, building overseers required the Royal
Egyptian Cubit to be calibrated against a precision standard at regular intervals. Failure to
do so was punishable by death. This extreme respect for the royal cubit indicates an
important legacy, like a standard handed down from the ‘Gods’.
According to the “Secrets of the Great Pyramid” (by L. Stecchini) the Egyptian measures of
length, originating from at least the 3rd millennium BC, were directly derived from the
circumference of the earth with an amazing accuracy. On page 346, his claim is that
the Egyptian measurement was equal to 40,075,000 meters, which compared to the
International Spheroid of 40,076,596 meters gives an error of 0.004%. No consideration
seems to be made to the question of, on purely technical and procedural grounds, how the early
Egyptians, in defining their cubit, could have achieved a degree of accuracy that to our
current knowledge can only be achieved with very sophisticated equipment and techniques.
Note: Egyptians calculated polar radius as 12,000,000 Royal Cubits (of 0.525 m per cubit)
which is equivalent of 6300 km (modern value for the polar radius of the Earth is 6,357km)
The Sacred Cubit (aka Royal Cubit) was used in constructing buildings and monuments
and in surveying in ancient Egypt. Royal Cubit consists of 28 units, digits ( 7 palms of 4
digits). The names of divisions of royal cubit may suggest anatomical origin, however the
division numbers indicate astronomical origin of the cubit (7 days per week, 28 days lunar
calendar, 4 weeks per lunar month)…
Note: Here is an interesting connection between modern and ancient units of length with
astronomy and geodesy: 1 foot = 12 inches, 1 mile = 5280 feet = 63,360 inches = 4800
Sumerian Feet = 3200 Sumerian Cubits.
There is great confusion today concerning metrology, the history of measurement systems
around the world. Beyond the child’s tales of the “foot” deriving from some king’s
foot, measurement was actually part of a sacred system of knowledge established in
prehistory and based on timeless truths seen in the harmony of the cosmos. Standards of
measure were everywhere framed upon never-changing principles of number, in
particular, the interplay of natural tension between ten and twelve, and the dimensions of
the turning Earth. Except for the survival of the English system in the U.S., most other
traditional systems of measurement worldwide have succumbed to the “easy” and modern, but
inferior “metric” system, which uses only ten, is divorced from nature and the human scale, and
requires its users to conform to the measuring tools themselves, not to the nature of the objects
measured, as was traditionally done.
The Cosmological Diagram (The New Jerusalem Diagram)
The Sacred Geometric Community has fallen short of the grand prize, the New Jerusalem and
her fullness of purpose, they have at least seen, especially through the apostolic efforts of John
Michell, the suburbs of the Holy City and from this afar view have come imminently close to her
profound and universal meaning; and certainly by framing their quests for universal
understanding and sustainable social systems in terms of theCelestial City (or as in Plato’s
case, Magnesia). Their approach to the City Whose Builder and Maker is God (even though
that “god” is NOT the One of revelation and authority held by their antagonists amongst the
aforesaid monotheists), as we all, is seen through a glass darkly but, nevertheless, they
are searching to unlock the mystery of the New Jerusalem and to confirm their findings
through geodetic discovery.
Another version of the NJ Diagram is Magical Seal of Solomon.
In Medieval Jewish, Christian and Islamic legends, the Seal of Solomon was a magical signet
ring said to have been possessed by King Solomon, which variously gave him the power to
command demons, genies (or jinni), or to speak with animals. In some versions the seal was
made of brass and iron, carved with the Name of God, and set with four jewels. In later versions
the ring simply bore the symbol now called the Star of David (hexagram), often within a circle,
usually with the two triangles interlaced rather than intersecting.
To them the “geometric construction” of the New Jerusalem presents cosmological realities
which govern the universe – a universe numerically understood far more by the
“ancients” who have left us a testament in their objects and writings to these realities whereby
John’s vision of the Holy City is the culmination of all their most vivid aspirations; to wit, the
elaborate geometric configurations from the New Jerusalem Diagram to intriguing
planetary measurements of circles, squares, triangles, polygons of all sorts which provide
immediate connectivity between earth and heaven’s realms – as well as those earthly objects
of antiquity which replicate the heavenly dimensions of Paradise, and all within the context,
preservation and accuracies of antiquity:
“Another relic of the archaic tradition that produced these divisions of time is our present system
of measurement by units of feet, furlongs, and miles, with the acre as the unit of land measuring.
Those measures, which are still found the most convenient today, were canonized and held
sacred, because not only do they relate both to the human and to the astronomical
scales, expressing the unity between macrocosm and microcosm, but they bring out the same
numbers in the dimensions of the solar system as were given to the units of time.” —
Dimensions of Paradise, Michell, p. 117.
One of the foremost metrologists of Teotihuacán is, without equivocation, Dr. Hugh Harleston
Jr., who during the late 1960s and 1970s measured this “ritual city” from a “…unified
geometrical composition whose intervals are clearly defined, and Harleston was soon able to
establish the basic unit of measure in its dimensions. This proved to be a unit of 1.0594 meters,
which Harleston called the Standard Teotihuacán Unit (STU) or Hunab after the Mayan word,
adopted by the Aztecs, for Measure. He also recognized the geodetic significance of that unit:
1.0594063 meters is equivalent to the ‘Jewish rod’ of 3.4757485 ft., the same unit which
represents the width of the Stonehenge lintels, a six-millionth part of the earth’s polar radius and
one part in 37,800,000 of its mean circumference.” (Ref. The New View Over Atlantis, Dr. John
Michell, 1995, p. 131).
Also: “Harleston says of Teotihuacan’s builders: ‘When they draw a line, they’re telling you
an area. When they draw an area, they’re telling you a volume. When they put volume,
they’re telling you time.”
Geodesy and geodetic placement of “sacred sites” of ancient origins has long been
affirmatively suspect – especially, the Great Pyramid of Giza. Geodesy involves a
fundamental understanding of plane or solid geometry, astronomy relative to latitude and
longitude with latitude of more recent vintage since ships-clock (cir. 1540) came into
vogue. These geodetic or geometric relationships both on earth and in the heavens are a
frequent haunt of pagans and occultists and of novel interest to science – though science
with its unfortunate proliferation of skeptic is apt to go off into “metric tangents” and miss out on
“…but thou hast ordered all things in measure and number and weight” — Wisdom of
Solomon 11:20 (1611 King James Bible)
Biblical creation “by measure, number and weight” required God to possess a fluency in
arithmetic not always shared by the faithful. And so Bible arithmetic of the first millennium BC
eventually became incomprehensible.
Today much of the astronomy, arithmetic, and music attributed to Classical Greece is
documented to Semitic Babylon in the second millennium B.C. Mesopotamian fluency in
calculation–in the age of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob–already was 3000 years ahead of 16th
century AD Europe. Babylonian exile in the sixth century BC made accessible to the Jews
anything not already known.
The astrolabe’s naked geometry and simple arithmetical doubling expose the idealist mind set
which guided the evolution of Chaldaean sciences — converted to priestly ritual by Jewish
ingenuity. Twelve ideal months of 30 fictitious days were superimposed on the heavens, and
the ratio of longest night to shortest day, known to be about 3:2, was computed as 2:1, so
that only music offered a “manipulable” example which conformed to these rounded measures.
Concentric circles anticipate Ezekiel’s “wheel in a wheel” as the throne of heaven. Within
each circle maxima and minima water clock weights of 2:1 anticipate the ratio of cyclic octaves.
But equal weight differences between successive months (reversing at the solstices in months III
and IX) had to give way to proportional differences between successive semitones when this
geometry was applied to music.Rational tonal arithmetic, cleverly mimed by Ezekiel, could
anticipate this conceptual equality only via a slight but cumulative excess or deficiency, for
in a cyclic octave of ratio 1:2 all equal divisions are defined by irrationals. Thus the Holy
Land of a spiritual Israel had to be conquered conceptually in intricate warfare between
the excess of primordial “giants” (products of 3) and the deficiency of human “weaklings”
(products of 5) among rational numbers, and “weaklings” won only with Divine help in
circumventing the lack of real number. Bible narrative brilliantly allegorizes every aspect of
Diophantine approximation to modern Equal Temperament, and it does so with exhausting
respect for numerical detail–making the Bible a priceless repository of tuning lore and its
elementary number theory. The “unhewn” stones of Jewish altars are integers, meaning the
natural or counting numbers to which harmonical theory normally was restricted, although its
calculation demanded great fluency with reciprocal fractions. From the perspective of any
reference pitch all integers except 2n necessarily “sinned” by “missing the mark” to some degree
because octave doubling imposed, a priori, a universal matrix (“womb”) tied to integral powers
of 2. Problems arose immediately with division into 2 equal parts (requiring the square
root of 2) and 3 parts (requiring the cube root of 2).
Sensory intuition always fails at some level of arithmetical subtlety where least noticeable
differencescreate a Platonic “no man’s land” of uncertainty. Greek, Jewish, and Chinese cultures
are unanimous in accepting the comma of 80:81 as its convenient normative value. It is the
difference between a “giant” wholetone of 8:9 (worth 204 cents in modern logarithmic measure)
and a “human weakling” of 9:10 (worth only 190). They are approximations to the sixth root of
2 worth 200 cents, the value necessary to divide an octave 1:2 into six equal parts. How Davidic
tuning theory reconciles this conflict becomes the central focus of Bible allegory And in the
sixth century BC only God could have solved this problem numerically–although any geometer
could map results to his own satisfaction for the astrolabe pointed the way.
For musician/philosophers of Philo’s temperament, tuning theory may always have been a
contest in the soul between the potential tyranny of masculine intellection, considered mankind’s
very highest power, and the relative benevolence of our feminine sensorium, where least
noticeable differences create some measure of perceptual tolerance. Wisdom required a congenial
mating between our own masculine concepts and feminine percepts, and sometimes rewarded it
with the experience of transcendent beauty in “out of the body” adventures like Philo enjoyed
when listening to the antiphonal singing of segregated sexes in his Alexandrine synagogue. I am
trying here to articulate Bible harmonics in Philo’s spirit while paying closer attention to its
computational logic.
Philo’s insight proves to decode most (though not yet all) Bible numerology. And that decoding
exposes the poetic metaphors in which the Jews embodied algebra. As we gain a stronger hold
on this forgotten Bible arithmetic, the literary genius of authorial allegory reveals its power to
encode structure and meaning on two parallel levels: 1) in an esoteric arithmetic probably never
understood except by experts in computation, but therefore needing only cryptic allusion; and 2)
in homely parables which make symbolic meaning clear even to the illiterate, and thus protect
priestly allegory against any accusation of elitism. I am concerned here mainly with the forgotten
tonal logic in biblical numerology, employed with perfect discipline by Bible authors from the
first page of Genesis to the last page of Revelation–where Jewish playfulness fades into Christian
dogma.
[…]
Both Ezekiel and Plato project their arithmetic into similar concentric circles, “a wheel in a
wheel,” functioning as the throne of an idealized heaven. Plato’s analysis of 5,040 fits many of
Ezekiel’s metaphors and thus facilitates decoding the sameness and difference between nascent
Greek science and traditional Jewish wisdom. This is the cross-cultural ambiance in which Philo
was educated and about which he wrote with equal passion for Greek learning and for his own
religion, which shared the same models. The music of the synagogue embodied their union and
freed his soul to roam where it would. The two musical modes decoded from Bible numerology
have proved to be associated historically with the mode of the Torah (Greek Dorian) and the
mode of the Prophets (Greek Phrygian) in ways Philo helps us understand; they are the two
modes Plato admitted in model cities.
The importance of the priestly 7-year calendrical cycle is emphasized in Ezekiel 39:10 where
God insists that after his destruction of Israel’s enemies the country will have no “need to take
wood out of the field or cut down any out of the forests” for a period of seven years, “for they
will make their fires of the weapons” of warfare. I analyze the tonal content in 5,040 “days plus
nights” as furnishing Jewish “weapons” of spiritual warfare not merely on this circumstantial
biblical evidence but because this also follows Jewish philosophical precedent. In Sepher
Yezirah, “A Book on Creation” written perhaps about the fourth century AD and considered by
some to be the founding document in Jewish philosophy, factorial
seven meaning 1x2x3x4x5x6x7=5,040 is decomposed with a cryptic competence which Philo
did not possess personally, and so I fit his musicology into its schema. In this later document the
Jews have tired of musical games and are putting harmonics behind them in favor of more
general philosophical concerns. Thus it was the honest urge toward more general meaning which
eventually helped Judaism to forget its debts to music. Sepher Yezirah elegantly directs attention
to the systematic expansion of the harmonical system through successive factorials.
Two stones build two houses, three stones build six houses, four build twenty-four houses, five
build one hundred and twenty houses, six build seven hundred and twenty houses and seven build
five thousand and forty houses. From thence further go and reckon what the mouth cannot
express and the ear cannot hear.
Factorial 7 leads us to “what the mouth cannot express and the ear cannot hear.” Today we are
generally introduced to quantified tone ratios via a harmonic series on C. I invent a Philonic
preview to ease readers into the past.
[…]
–––––––
The following are few quotes from “THE ILLUMINATI’S SIX DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE” by
Adam Weishaupt
Mathematics is in fact the surest proof of cosmic mind and intelligence. It is absurd to
propose, as materialistic science does, that mindless matter is miraculously able to organize itself
in a host of complex ways according to the “laws of physics”. No scientist has ever explained
where the laws of physics come from and how they are possible. Why those laws and not others?
Why any laws at all? Why not eternal randomness and chaos? Why should matter be subject
to law at all? Why should matter have any connection with mathematics? In fact, the cosmos
“learned” mathematics over many eons by nothing more sophisticated than trial and error,
evolutionary natural selection and dialectical progression: the principles that have guided all
existence since time immemorial. The cosmos in itself- dimensionless energy – continually
“spilled” out of itself into dimensionality. It is the nature of Will never to be “contained”.
It will always try to reach beyond itself.
This was a haphazard process since dimensionality is mathematical and mathematics did not yet
exist in any coherent way. Each time Will entered the domain of partial, incomplete
dimensionality, it learned some new item of mathematical information. After countless
“experiments”, the Will had learned to count and understand geometrical shapes. Not in any
conscious sense – more like the ultimate autistic savant. Its grasp of mathematics was strictly
intuitive. Mathematics was the first language ever learned by the cosmos; it is thereby the
fundamental language of existence. It is the basis of all order and thought, of logic and reason, of
mind, of consciousness. It is the essential framework providing the categories of understanding.
It is the sine qua non. Mathematics can be considered as the true version of the Platonic Forms:
eternal, perfect, unchanging, existing in a permanent ideal state to which the whole cosmos has
access. They were not given to the cosmos as perfect Forms; rather they dialectically evolved
and when they reached their Omega Point they were subject to no further change; they had
achieved perfection and completion. Plato’s domain of perfect Forms is the domain of
mathematics and it is now hard-wired into the cosmos (we might say that this domain is stored in
the core memory of the cosmic mind, the Read-Only memory, to use a computing term.) The
Will learned through its endless experimentation that only “complete” mathematics is stable and
provides a proper framework for organization and order: all of Plato’s mathematical Forms must
be used, not an incomplete subset. And so came the miraculous moment when the r = o
dimensionless cosmos of mind deliberately poured itself out into the r > o dimensional cosmos,
according to a perfect intuitive understanding of complete mathematics as eternal Platonic
Forms. Formlessness flowed through the domain of mathematical Forms and emerged in the
myriad forms we observe in Nature. Plato’s mathematical Forms are the origins of the laws of
physics that shape the world we observe around us. They dictated the creation of the material
world. This supreme, defining event was none other than the Big Bang itself.
It is essential for the cosmos to externalise itself, to physicalize itself, to alienate itself, in order
to dialectically overcome that alienation and reach self-consciousness. The teleological purpose
of the cosmos is precisely that: to attain self-consciousness, to actualise all of the latent
powers, potential and possibilities of raw mind. No scientist has ever explained how mind
originates in dead, mindless matter. The truth is that the arche is alive and minded and always
has been. There is no dualism between life and death, between mind and non-mind, between
consciousness and non-consciousness. Everything exists on a continuum of actualisation of
life, mind and consciousness. Humans have more of it (more actualisation) than plants which
have more of it than rocks which have more of it than interstellar dust. The cosmos is based on
monism, not dualism. To be precise, it is a dialectical monism. All dualistic systems- those
based on two radically different concepts such as mind/matter, death/life,
consciousness/non-consciousness -all fail for exactly the same reason: two unlike substances
cannot interact.
[…]
Humanity, for the most part, lacks imagination. People can’t see beyond what seems
“obvious”. They have such a strong attachment to common sense that they prefer it to reason.
Their “gut instincts” are tied to common sense, not to reason. In a “fight or flight” situation, it
will be a rare person who pauses to reason his way out of the dilemma. Leibniz said that the best
account of the world is the one that is “simplest in hypotheses and the richest in phenomena.” If
you were God, isn’t this exactly the creative principle that you would employ i.e. the simplest
solution that provides the most possibilities? The universe appears immensely complex, yet
humanity, via science, seems to have made a remarkable degree of sense of much of it. If the
universe is based on rational principles (i.e. is not some random, lawless, chaotic,
incomprehensible arena), why should the exercise of reason be unable to reveal its secrets?
If the principles of reason are universal then they apply to God as much as humanity; the
better we become at reasoning, the more we become Godlike, as Plato and Aristotle were
keen to assert. The biggest obstacle we have is that our minds have evolved in a way that
makes it difficult, though not impossible, for us to discern the true nature of reality. If common
sense and the evidence of our senses on the one hand, and profound scientific, logical and
mathematical reasoning on the other, are not aligned then this means thatwe are continually
deceived by what we take for granted.
Ill-informed non -scientists often sneer at science. In truth, they have no comprehension of what
science says and they refuse to budge from their common sense opinions by which they are
permanently enslaved. Certain people have an enormous interest in maintaining a common sense
set of opinions because, crucially, no one needs to be an expert to make pronouncements based
on common sense. Common sense could be defined as Lowest Common Denominator thinking
– i.e. the most basic, least sophisticated, least demanding level of thinking. Common sense
thinking favours stupid people because it is infinitely closer to their view of the world than it is
to the abstract, complex, visionary thinking of geniuses. Common sense is all about “dumbing
down”.
[…]
Plato complained that he had created the perfect state, but where were the perfect
people? The tragedy of humanity is that it is held back by humanity. It has never turned to its
greatest minds. It has never placed its trust in the most meritorious. It has never valued
“heresy” – the ability to choose differently. Instead, it has burned the heretics.
If humanity were intelligent, the Abrahamic religions would not exist. In the future, when
humanity is guided by Illumination and is on course to achieve its divine potential, the
Abrahamic faiths will seem like a bad, far distant, primitive memory of horror, and no one will
be able to comprehend that humans once held such absurd beliefs. Once someone acknowledges
that common sense is wrong then it follows that they are placing themselves at the mercy of
experts, of the geniuses of the human race who have developed abstract and bewilderingly
complicated techniques for understanding the truth of existence.
If advanced mathematics is the language of Nature rather than common sense opinion then
most people are screwed, right?
What’s the point of hanging on to simplistic and false opinions? To comfort yourself? To
pander to your vanity? Deep down, most people realize they don’t have a clue about the
mysteries of life. Some have a spiritual yearning that brings them to websites like ours, and they
are to be applauded, yet the vast majority arrogantly dismiss anything they don’t
understand and bury their heads in the sand like the good ostriches they are. They lap up the
religions of faith because these don’t demand anything difficult of them.
What is a believer? He is someone who thinks that he is a good person and that he is
certainly going to heaven. Well, that’s not a hard position to hold, is it? If you ask such a person
about quantum mechanics, relativity theory, advanced mathematics, advanced philosophy,
advanced theology, he won’t have a clue what you’re talking about, but what does he care? He’s
a believer. He’s saved. God loves him. End of story. Now you can see why the religions of faith
have spread like a cancer across the globe. They require no knowledge. In fact, they despise
knowledge. Never forget Martin Luther’s insane declaration, “Reason is the Devil’s whore.” The
Abrahamic faiths are all about common sense in day-to-day matters -obeying rules, laws and
commandments set by the powers-that-be in the name of “God” -with the mysteries of life being
consigned to a compartment marked, “No need to worry. If I believe in God I will be OK.”
They can then get on with the rest of their lives -watching junk TV, eating junk food, getting
drunk, getting high, getting married, doing dreary jobs, waving the patriotic flag, shopping,
going to church on the Sabbath, going to the baseball game or football match yada yada yada: all
the sad, soulless nonsense that passes as the “glory” of humanity.
In fact, most of us are sad robots on permanent Auto Pilot. We insult the glories of which
we are truly capable, that we could attain if we succeeded in releasing our higher selves.
It’s time to stop shopping, to stop believing, to stop being enslaved by common sense. It’s time
for humanity to turn to knowledge, to Gnosticism. Ordinary people would like to think that
common sense is the right tool for understanding the world, and that philosophers, scientists and
mathematicians are wrong and perverse to seek “deeper” truths of reason that contradict common
sense.
Crop Circles: Crossovers from Another Dimension – 3-DVD Special Edition – Loaded with
Bonus Features and Interviews, Cat# U653 – Go to http://www.UFOTV.com.
Subject Related
The-self-aware-universe
Ancient Wisdom
Cosmic Blueprints
Sacred-geometry
Numbers Magick
Dance of the Planets
Ancient-timekeepers-part-5-units-of-measurement
THE PREHISTORIC ALIGNMENT OF WORLD WONDERS
Archaeoastronomy (astronomical alignments of ancient architecture)
Secrets in Plain Site
aiwaz.net/giza-project
Tao_of_The_Tau
This is a documentary on sacred geometry and the hidden meanings encoded within
buildings and city layouts. The secret society known as the Freemasons for centurys has used
the knowledge of the ancient world to speak to one another through mathematical formulations
called sacred geometry. Watch and be astounded as this is de-coded before your eyes, and gain