Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The following essay helps on decision making using some of the most supported solutions,
different point of views, and common scenarios.
The death penalty is a topic where no one is completely sure about their position. Choosing a side
it’s difficult as we got a few factors to consider when taking a decision. Morality, Faith, Own
experiences, the background of the crime.
We can argue that a life in prison it’s an easy fate because the victim doesn’t have that luxury
anymore. Jail is not a good place to live, you are lockdown with other people that did the same or
maybe worse crime, and the quality of life in prison varies where and in what terms are you going
in. taking away the jail subject. If someone ask for the death penalty should be for a major crime,
so, morally can we truly decide if someone should die. After all if we kill the offender, aren’t we
killers, as we decide when and how. The question gets even blurry if your faith says the opposite
or agrees.
What happens if the accused is mentally unstable, had a major factor that contributed in the
murder?
In every country/state that has approve the use of this action relays if the offender has enough
conscience of act. If is proven that he or she was mentally stable in any moment of the crime it is
allowed to apply for the death penalty therefore, if the offender didn’t had the mental capability
to act then its rejected.
The use of drugs, extortion, suspect of betrayal, etc. Are allowed to use the death penalty as the
mental illness is the only exception.
How the death penalty affects a society and how efficient it is?
Contrary to what we could imply the death penalty does not contribute to the deterrence of
crime. It does not prevent violent behavior in at least mentally ill or retarded criminals. Criminals
who are mentally incapacitated before they are sent to prison do not have the state of mind or
intellect to determine right from wrong. Many of these criminals commit violent crimes because
these individuals aren't able to function properly in society and do not understand the
consequences of their actions. These people do not understand the death penalty or comprehend
what it entails. As a result, the death penalty is unsuccessful in averting violent crime in these
individuals.
The death penalty sends a confusing and contradictory message. It strives to prevent criminals
from murder and violent crimes by terminating the lives of those convicted. This is highly
contradictory. The death penalty sends the message "Don't kill or we will kill you." Punishing an
action with the same action is incongruous and inconsistent as there are not enough proofs to tell
the opposite.
This is one of the most common claims that “cons” persons give when ask about an innocent
person and anything related to the de death penalty. There aren’t strong points on “pro”
individuals on how to prevent this to happen or what to do on this scenarios.
As the most prevalent point is that is a cost, that we as society had to pay and that we can learn
from the mistakes to shield the system from mistakes, as if we are talking about planes. Each time
that a plane falls we search for the problem and we fix our planes, in this case the system, we
instruct our pilots on what to do, in this case the persons working in the system, and to instruct
and keep safe our passengers, the common person in a government.
Luis Gerardo Gonzalez Tovar I.D 25.892.899 III Semester Morning Shift