You are on page 1of 2

U.S.

Department of Justice

Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board of Immigration Appeals
Office of the Clerk

5107 Leesburg Ptke. Su/le 2000
Falls Church. V1rgm1a 22041

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net
Weigle, Douglas Shaw OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - NYC
Bartlett & Weigle Co LPA 26 Federal Plaza, 11th Floor
600 Gwynne Building New York, NY 10278
602 Main Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202

Name: DIAGOURAGA, YOUSSOUF A 072-020-744
Riders:070-868-268

Date of this notice: 6/20/2018

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case.

Sincerely,

Donna Carr
Chief Clerk

Enclosure

Panel Members:
Kendall Clark, Molly

Userteam: Docket

For more unpublished decisions, visit
www.irac.net/unpublished/index

Cite as: Youssouf Diagouraga, A072 020 744 (BIA June 20, 2018)
u:s. Department of Justice Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Executive Office for Immigration Review

Falls Church, Virginia 22041

Files: A072 020 744 - New York, NY Date:
A070 868 268 JUN 2 0 20f8

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC | www.irac.net
In re: YoussoufDIAGOURAGA
Drame NERME

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS

MOTION

ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS: Douglas S. Weigle, Esquire

APPLICATION: Reopening

This matter was last before the Board on November 30, 2011, when we summarily dismissed
the respondents' appeal of the Immigration Judge's December 16, 2010, decision denying the
respondents' motion to reopen proceedings held in absentia. On March 16, 2018, the respondents
filed a motion to reopen with the Board. The Department ofHomeland Security has not submitted
a response to the motion.

The respondents request that we sua sponte reopen proceedings so that they may pursue
adjustment of status based on an approved visa petition filed by their United States citizen
daughter. Given the circumstances presented, including the fact that the respondents have a
number of United States citizen children, the youngest ofwhom is 2, and the evidence regarding
country conditions in the respondents' native Mali, as well as the lack ofopposition to the motion,
we find that reopening sua sponte is warranted. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a); see also Matter ofG-D-,
22 I&N Dec. 1132 (BIA 1999); Matter ofJ-J-, 21 l&N Dec. 976 (BIA 1997).

Accordingly, the following order is entered.

ORDER: The respondents' motion to reopen is granted and the record is remanded to the
Immigration Judge for further proceedings consistent with this decision.

\A��\d,ft 0 THE BOARD

Cite as: Youssouf Diagouraga, A072 020 744 (BIA June 20, 2018)