Professional Documents
Culture Documents
halls and opera houses throughout Europe. Shortly after its premiere Verdi
conducted it at La Scala inMilan, and onNovember 17, 1874,Verdi’s former
student EmanueleMuzio directed the authorized United States premiere at
the American Academy of Music in New York. The version of the Messa da
Requiemperformed in these locations was the same as that heard today with
a single exception. The “Liber scriptus” section of the “Dies irae,” originally
a fugue for four-part chorus and orchestra, was rewritten by Verdi for the
London performance of 1875 (AlbertHall,May 15) as a mezzo-soprano solo
that became the definitive version. Although by the end of 1875 the work
had been heard in four Italian cities, elsewhere in Europe, and as far away
as Argentina, Egypt, and the United States, the number of performances
declined quickly in the following years.37 It seems tohave becomeestablished
in the repertory no earlier than the 1930s.38
Some controversy concerning the “genre” of the Requiem has surrounded
the work from its earliest years. Numerous writers have called
attention to the “operatic,” “dramatic,” and “theatrical” qualities of the
music. But themusical style of the Requiem differs in significant ways from
Verdi’s operas, as the composer himself impliedwhen he commented on the
manner in which theworkmust be performed: “onemust not sing thisMass
as one sings anopera, and therefore the coloriti [phrasing, attacks, dynamics]
that may be good for the theatre will not be tomy liking at all.” 39 Above all,
the Requiem has a “character,” perhaps resulting in part from the musical
systems imparting coherence to the work as a whole, as well as through
reprises of music from the “Requiem aeternam” and “Dies irae” movements,
subtle thematic connectionswithin and acrossmovements involving
intervallic motion, motivic figuration, “harmonic mystification,” and even
tempo.40 Verdi’s work surely deserves its hallowed position in the sacred
music repertory.