Estimating Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients on building surfaces.

© All Rights Reserved

3 views

Estimating Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients on building surfaces.

© All Rights Reserved

- heat transger
- MTV 410 Semester Test 2 April 2012
- ASTM C177
- Calculation of the Heat Transfer Surface Area of Heat Exchangers for Waste Heat Recovery with the Kaline Cycle
- heat Transfer
- Numerical Modeling of Wire and Tube Condenser Used in Domestic Refrigerators
- Heat Transfer College slides
- Mef 2
- WindSonic Datasheet
- Effects of Wind on Tower Cranes
- Thermal Resistance of Steam Condensation in Horizontal Tube Bundles
- Energy Management Quiz-2
- Tutorial 3
- L_10
- 2 Heat Transfer Analysis
- PDF 00004
- Le Ngoc Lieu_lecture 1_chapter 1
- AM-4206.pdf
- HMT Paper
- 19414

You are on page 1of 9

com

www.elsevier.com/locate/buildenv

coe"cient at building surfaces

Aya Hagishima∗ , Jun Tanimoto

Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, 6-1 Kasugakoen, Kasuga-shi, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan

Received 26 November 2002; received in revised form 31 January 2003; accepted 18 February 2003

Abstract

To establish a comprehensive and qualitative prediction basis for the convective heat transfer coe"cient (CHTC) for various urban

canopy surfaces mainly consisting of building envelopes, a series of outdoor experiments were performed. Multi-point measurements of

surface heat balance lead to a distribution of the CHTC on an actual building envelope. Several turbulent statistical values acquired at

two di4erent sites enabled the development of an experimental equation depicted by non-dimensional numbers that express a relationship

between CHTC and wind velocity containing a turbulent factor. An important thing is the fact that the two measuring sites, one a rooftop

slab and the other the vertical wall of a test dwelling, have di4erent scales and di4erent surface directions facing the wind.

? 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

sented for various situations [2]. However, the representa-

Recently, the convective heat transfer coe"cient (CHTC) tive 6ow speed of those equations is de=ned in a sphere out

of building surfaces has been regarded as an important of boundary layer that can be regarded as a uniform 6ow.

parameter in discussions not only of the building thermal For an actual urban area the representative 6ow speed is not

load, but also of the urban environment, since CHTC is readily determined. The urban canopy inevitably has a com-

crucially important in estimating convective heat 6ux in plex air pattern, which is encouraged by the roughness of

urban climatology. the canopy, and the natural wind 6ow originally contains a

However, the conclusions concerning CHTC in various great deal of turbulence and uncertainty of wind direction.

studies that have been conducted on the subject seem to be Therefore, it can be di"cult to apply these empirical equa-

ambiguous. tions to CHTC in an urban climatology model.

For example, CFD has become a popular technique, The circumstances discussed above have led dozens of

backed by the recent growth of computer performance, researchers in building physics to attempt to perform out-

for use in estimating the thermal environment of an urban door measurements on the CHTC of building envelopes [3].

canyon [1]. And yet, some researchers have assumed that Urano estimated the CHTC of the rooftop of buildings by

the CHTC is constant [1], because of a lack of knowledge obtaining the residual term of a heat balance equation that

of the CHTC for building surfaces, which should be taken contains measured net radiation and conductive heat 6ux

into consideration when making CFD calculations. [4], which seems an orthodox method. This author’s group

In the =eld of heat transfer, particularly related to mechan- made ‘SAT meters’, which consisted of an insulated board

ical engineering, many empirical equations containing the covered with a black-painted copper plate or hundreds of

Nusselt number, the preponderant dimensionless number in black-painted copper leafs, which were used to estimate the

CHTC for a bare soil surface [5] and a turf covered sur-

face [6]. Narita reported a marvelously unique method for

∗

estimating the CHTC on an actual building surface [7]. In

Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-92-583-7646; fax: +81-92-

583-7600.

his study, the measured evaporation rate that came from the

E-mail addresses: aya@cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp (A. Hagishima), transient weight change of wet paper stuck onto the build-

tanimoto@cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp (J. Tanimoto). ing surface led to CHTC based on Lewis’s law. Barlow and

0360-1323/03/$ - see front matter ? 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(03)00033-7

874 A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881

Belcher also tried this technique using naphthalene sublima- An important factor to consider is that in our equation, the

tion instead of water evaporation in a wind tunnel experi- de=ned height of the wind velocity was measured as being

ment [8]. very close to the building surface, to compensate for the

When reviewing these previous studies, it is necessary to high correlation and universality. Given this, the proposed

consider certain problems when comparing the experimen- equation seems to be useful as a wall function of the k–

tal equations proposed in the studies. One is the fact that the model.

height of the representative wind velocity di4ers from re-

searcher to researcher. In addition, the fact that those heights

are de=ned so as to be several metres or more away from the 2. Features of the measurement site and time period

building surface presents another problem. Because of this,

it is almost impossible to apply the equations used in those 2.1. Measuring site and items

experiments, since a wind 6ow pattern around a building

6uctuates considerably, which means that the wind pro=le is Table 1 shows the features of the measurement site and

highly dependent upon distance from the building envelope. time periods during which the measurements were taken.

In addition to the outdoor measurements, wind tunnel ex- Figs. 1 and 2 show the plan and photos of the measurement

periments have also been performed in order to study the site, respectively. Two objective sites were chosen in order

distribution of CHTC on an urban surface [9]. Although it to obtain the measurement data under di4erent conditions

is possible to obtain a large amount of data by performing for both the air patterns and the scale expressed by the rep-

wind tunnel experiments under various conditions, such as resentative length.

building arrangement, wind direction, and so on, the results We mounted 16 measuring points in a lattice at the

are inexact, because the wind deviation or turbulence in a rooftop in survey-1a, because the horizontal distribution

wind tunnel is much less than that of outdoor natural wind. was expected to 6uctuate extensively due to the neighbour-

In summary, the former studies do not provide a universal ing four-storey building. In addition, there was a rain gutter

predictive methodology for estimating the CHTC of building on the edge of the rooftop. The gutter had a height of about

surfaces as the sub model for the urban canopy model or 25 cm. Since the test dwelling was situated on a turntable

the k–e model. In order to present the universal equation of which could be revolved, we were able to adjust the direc-

the CHTC of building surfaces, it is necessary to consider tion of the vertical wall of survey-2 according to the natural

the height of reference velocity, and to make veri=cation wind direction.

based on the several outdoor measurements under various The features of the measuring items and instruments used

conditions. are listed in Table 2.

In this paper, we present the results of two types of out- The surface temperature, conductive heat 6ux, and global

door measurements. First, we measured the multi-points heat solar radiation were measured at 16 points in survey-1a. The

balances at the rooftop of an actual building in order to net radiation, wind velocity, and downward long wave radi-

identify the horizontal distribution of the CHTC. Next, we ation were also measured. The measurement data related to

measured the CTHC and the turbulent statistic values at two the heat balance in survey-1a and survey-2 were recorded

surfaces, which had a di4erent wind direction and di4erent at 1-min intervals, and those in survey-1b were recorded

representative length. From these results, we found a uni- at 2-s intervals. Five minute averages of those data were

versal relationship between the CHTC and wind velocity. used for the following analysis. In survey-1b and survey-2,

Table 1

Measurement sites and time periods

Survey-1a Horizontal roof slab of two-storey 1/Jan/2000 –31/Aug/2000 Surface heat balance was measured at

building attached to four-storey build- 16 points simultaneously.

ing. Slab size was 22:2 m × 15:3 m.

Survey-1b (ALC board of 100 mm thick- 2/Dec/2000 –3/Dec, Surface heat balance on four points

ness+polyurethane board of 20 mm 7/Jun/2001–14/Jun and turbulent statistical values near the

thickness+a water resistant layer of as- surface were measured simultaneously.

phalt sheet roo=ng)

Survey-2 Vertical wall of test dwelling sited 22/Dec/2000, 29/Dec Surface heat balance on the central

on the turntable at the rooftop of point and turbulent statistical values

four-storey building. Wall size was near the surface were measured simul-

2:4 m × 2:4 m. (insulation 20 mm taneously.

+ wood board coated with a black

non-glossy paint to avoid re6ection)

A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881 875

(a) (b)

survey-1a and survey-1b (horizontal roof slab) survey-2 (vertical wall of test dwelling)

Fig. 2. Photo of measuring site (a) survey-1a and survey-1b (horizontal roof slab); (b) survey-2 (vertical wall of test dwelling).

the wind velocity and air temperature were measured near (kg m−2 s−1 ); l the evaporation heat (J kg−1 ), and Rnet the

the measuring points at a height of 13 cm at 0:1 s intervals in net radiation (W m−2 ).

order to obtain the turbulence statistical values to establish The CHTC can be estimated by the following equation

a wall function of the turbulent k– model. The averaging using the convective heat 6ux and the temperature di4erence

time of the statistical values was 5 min. between air and the surface.

Before survey-1a, we con=rmed a small horizontal dis-

tribution of surface temperature on the rooftop by infrared h = CV=(Tair − Tsurf ); (2)

radiation images. Conductive heat sensors were painted the where, h: convective heat transfer coe"cient (CHTC)

same colours at the two measuring sites in order to maintain (W m−2 K −1 ); Tair : air temperature [K], and Tsurf : surface

the same solar re6ectance and emissivity. temperature [K].

In survey-1a, the net radiation was measured only at point

2.2. Method for estimating the CHTC 10. Then, the net radiation rates at the other measuring points

were estimated based on Eq. (3).

The CHTC was identi=ed from a set of measurement data 4

based on the following process. LR = · (Fi; wall · LR wall + Fi; sky · LR sky − Tsurf ); (3)

A heat balance equation on a general surface can be ex- where, Fi; j is the con=guration factor from the point i to

pressed by Eq. (1). Then, the convective heat 6ux on a sunny faced j, LR j the long wave radiation from the faced j

day in a succession of sunny days can be drawn if the terms (W m−2 ), SR the net solar radiation (W m−2 ), emissiv-

of the net radiation and conductive heat 6ux are measured, ity (assumed as = 1:0); the Stefan–Boltzman constant

since the evaporation rate can be neglected. (W m−2 K −4 ), subscript i the measuring point, subscript

Rnet + CD + CV − l · EV = 0; (1) sky the sky, and subscript wall the wall around the measure-

ment site.

where, CD is the conduction heat 6ux (W m−2 ); CV the The long wave radiation rates from the wall of the neigh-

convection heat 6ux (W m−2 ); EV the evaporation rate boring four-storey building and sky were identi=ed from the

876 A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881

Table 2

Air temperature Platinum resistance thermometer Sensors were positioned in the instru-

ment shelter with forced draft. At a

height of 1:2 m in the center of rooftop

Relative humidity Electrical capacitance hygrometer

Solar radiationa Solar meter 16 points

Net radiation Radiation meter 1 point (point-11)

Downward long wave radiation 2 points (point-2, point-10)

Conductive heat 6ux Heat 6ow meter 1 × 16 points

Surface temperature T-CC thermocouple 0:3 mm 4 × 16 points

Wind velocity

Wind direction 2D ultrasonic anemometer 1 point at a height of 60 cm in the

centre of rooftop

3D ultrasonic anemometer 2 points, at a height of 13 cmb

Air temperature Wind velocity 3D ultrasonic thermo-anemometerc 1 point, at a height of 13 cm Spans of

probe were 5 cm

Solar radiation Solar meter 1 point

Net radiation Radiation meter 1 point

Conductive heat 6ux Heat 6ow meter 1 point

Surface temperature T-CC thermocouple 0:3 mm 4 points

a The solar re6ectance was also measured by the albedo-meter.

b Turbulent statistical values were measured at a 10-Hz interval on points 7, 8, 9 and 14 at survey-1b.

c Turbulent statistical values were measured at a 10-Hz interval.

40 0 ~ 5˚C 5 ~ 10˚C 10 ~ 15˚C 15˚C ~ temperature di4erence of less than 15◦ C varied widely.

When the temperature di4erence was more than 15◦ C, the

30

variance of the plots was relatively small, and a linear re-

CHTCW/(m2K)

20

lationship was almost established between the CHTC and

wind velocity. This fact implies that forced convection is

10 dominant.

From these results, we adopted the measurement data un-

0 der the condition of di4erences between the surface tem-

0 2 4

wind velocity [m/s]

6 8 perature and the air temperature of more than 15◦ C for the

following analysis.

Fig. 3. Relationship between CHTC and wind velocity classi=ed by the

di4erences of the surface and air temperatures (survey-1a, point-10).

3.2. Horizontal distribution of CHTC of roof slab

downward long wave radiation measured at two points, Fig. 4 shows the horizontal distribution of the CHTC un-

point-10 and point-2. der di4erent wind directions. The CHTC is normalized by

the value of point-10.

In Fig. 4(a), the CHTC near the wall of the four-storey

3. Horizontal distribution of CHTC at the rooftop building was small. Also, the peak of the CHTC could be

(survey-1a) observed near the upwind edge of the slab. In contrast, the

pattern of distribution drawn in Fig. 4(b) is likely the in-

3.1. Relationship between the CHTC and the di6erence version of Fig. 4(a). This fact indicates that the distribution

between the air temperature and surface temperature of the CHTC changes depending on the distribution of the

wind velocity.

Fig. 3 shows the relationship between the CHTC of

point-10 and the wind velocity at a height of 60 cm classi- 3.3. Deviation of CHTC of rooftop

=ed by the temperature di4erence between the surface and

air. There was a positive correlation between the CHTC Fig. 5 shows the relation between the averaged CHTC

and wind velocity. Since small net radiation gives rise of 16 points and the wind velocity at a height of 60 cm in

to measurement error, the plots under the condition of the centre of the rooftop. Though the plots are scattered, a

A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881 877

Fig. 4. Horizontal distribution of normalized CHTC of roof slab by the value of point-10: (a) 29/Jan/2000 12:50, CHTC of point-10 is 19:6 W m−2 K −1 ;

(b) 4/July/2000 14:55, CHTC of point-10 is 15:6 W m−2 K −1 .

40 h = 2.28V + 8.18 1

0 .8

averaged CHTC [W/m2]

30

0 .6

20

0 .4

10

0 .2

0

0

0 2 4 6 8 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360

wind velocity [m/s]

wind direction [degree]

Fig. 5. Relationship between averaged CHTC and wind velocity

(survey-1a). Fig. 7. Relationship between the standard deviation of CHTC of 16 points

and wind direction (survey-1a).

1

4. Relationship between the CHTC and wind velocity

0 .8 near the surface (survey-1b, survey-2)

0 .6

4.1. Features of air :ow pattern

0 .4

The three-dimensional wind velocity was measured at

0 .2

0:1 s intervals with an ultrasonic anemometer at four points

0 out of 16 points in survey-1b. It was also measured in

0 2 4 6 8 survey-2 at a central point of the vertical wall of the test

wind velocity [m/s]

dwelling, and the heat balance there was also measured. In

Fig. 6. Relationship between the standard deviation of CHTC of 16 points both cases, the anemometer was mounted 13 cm above the

and wind velocity (survey-1a). surface. Fig. 8 shows the location of the measuring points.

From these measurement data, the relationship between the

CHTC and wind velocity was investigated in this section.

linear relationship seems to exist between the CHTC and Figs. 9 and 10 show the “wind roses” of each measuring

wind velocity. points and the variation of the wind direction of point-8, re-

Fig. 6 shows the relationship between the standard devi- spectively. The wind direction data of survey-1b were mea-

ation of CHTC of 16 points and the wind velocity at the sured by a 2D-ultrasonic anemometer, which was mounted

centre of the rooftop. Fig. 7 shows the relationship between closely to each point. The wind direction data obtained in

the standard deviation of CHTC and the wind direction. survey-2 were measured by a propeller type anemometer

The plots of each graph are scattered, and it is di"cult mounted 15 m above the penthouse at the top of the steel

to establish any obvious correlation between the CTHC and tower. With respect to point-8 in survey-1b, the data can

both the wind velocity and direction. However, the fact that be divided into two periods according to the wind direc-

the variance of CHTC in the rooftop is about 20% was tion, point-8-1 and point-8-2. This is because the separation

con=rmed. and back6ow encouraged by the rooftop edge are extremely

878 A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881

to the wall surface

w measuring point

4-story 9 14 v

building u

(H=16.5m) 7 w

difinition of 15.3m u

w

wind direction

measuring

v

N

8 v u point

pararrel wind direction

to the wall surface

(a) survey-1b (b) survey-2

Fig. 8. Measuring points of turbulent statistical value (site plan): (a) survey-1b; and (b) survey-2.

40 40 60 60

frequen cy [%] frequen cy [%] frequen cy [%] frequen cy [%]

E S E S E S E S

40 40

20 20

20 20

0 0 0 0

N W N W N W N W

8 -1 8 -2

(a) survey1-b, point-7 (b) survey1-b, point-8 (c) survey1-b, point-9 (d) survey1-b, point-14

40

frequency [%] S

E

20

N W

n orm al

p ararrel

(e) survey-2

Fig. 9. Wind rose of every measuring point: (a) survey1-b, point-7; (b) survey1-b, point-8; (c) survey1-b, point-9; (d) survey1-b, point-14; (e) survey-2.

12/Jun/ 2001

8-2 those. Fig. 12 shows that the turbulent energy observed in

point-8-2 is larger than that of the other points, because of

N

Wind direction

W

component-w in survey-2 is less than that of survey-1b.

S

E

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 JST

Fig. 10. Variation of wind direction of point-8 (survey-1b). 4.2. Relationship between CHTC and wind velocity

signi=cant in point 8-2. In addition, the wind direction at u2 + v2 + w2 and CHTC in survey-1b.

point-8-2 6uctuated extensively. The data for all those points Concerning the measurement data of point-7, point-9, and

except point-8-2 indicated that the wind direction was al- point-14, a linear relationship can be established as

most stable.

Figs. 11 and 12 show the relationships between

u2 + v2 + w2 and both the variation of the wind compo- h = 3:96 u2 + v2 + w2 + 6:42: (4)

A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881 879

σv σv σv σv

σw σw σw σw

deviation [m/s]

deviation [m/s]

deviation [m/s]

deviation [m/s]

1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5

1 1 1 1

0 0 0 0

0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s]

(a) point-7 (b) point-8 (c) point-9 (d) point-14

Fig. 11. Relationship between u2 + v2 + w2 and the deviation of each composition, u ; v , and w (survey-1b, H = 13 cm): (a) point-7; (b) point-8;

(c) point-9; and (d) point-14.

3 3 3 3

p oint-7 p oint-9 p oint-14

turbulent energy

turbulent energy

turbulent energy

turbulent energy

2 2 2 2

p oint-8-1

1 1 p oint-8-2 1 1

0 0 0 0

0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s]

(a) point-7 (b) point-8 (c) point-9 (d) point-14

Fig. 12. Relationship between u2 + v2 + w2 and turbulent energy (survey-1b, H = 13 cm): (a) point-7; (b) point-8; (c) point-9; and (d) point-14.

2 2 3 3

σu

σu turbulent energy

turbulent enrgy

σv

deviation [m/s]

deviation [m/s]

1.5 σv 1.5

σw 2 2

σw

1 1

1 1

0.5 0.5

0 0 0

0

0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4

0 1 2 3 4

w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s] w ind velocity [m/s]

(a) normal wind direction (b) parallel wind direction (c) normal wind direction (d) parallel wind direction

Fig. 13. Relationships between u2 + v2 + w2 and both (u ; v ; w ) and turbulent energy (survey-2, H = 13 cm): (a) normal wind direction; (b) parallel

wind direction; (c) normal wind direction; and (d) parallel wind direction.

25

30 N o.7,9,14

N o.7

20 N o.9 N o.8-1

25

CH T C [W/m 2 ]

N o.14 N o.8-2

CH T C [W/m 2 ]

15 20

10 15

10

5 y = 3.96x + 6.42

5

0

0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

w ind velocity [m/s] 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

w ind velocity [m/s]

Fig. 14. Relationship between u2 + v2 + w2 and CHTC (survey1-b,

Fig. 15. Relationship between u2 + v2 + w2 and CHTC (survey-1b).

points 7, 9, and 14).

880 A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881

survey -2(p ararrel) survey -1b

30 survey -1(7,9,14) survey -2

CH T C [W/m 2 ]

Nu number[-]

25 1E+4

20

15

1E+3

10

y = 0.023x0.891

5 y = 10.21x + 4.47

0 1E+2

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 1E+4 1E+5 1E+6 1E+7

w ind velocity [m/s] Re number[-]

Fig. 16. Relationship between u2 + v2 + w2 and CHTC (survey-2). Fig. 17. Relationship between Re number and Nu number.

The number of data points is 618, and the correlation coef- on the least-squares method is as follows:

=cient is 0.893.

Nu = 0:023 · Re0:891 ; (7)

In contrast, the slope of the data of point-8-1 is a little

bit smaller than that of the others. The CHTC of point-8-2 l · u2 + v 2 + w 2

is larger than that of point-7, point-9, and point-14. This is Re = : (8)

probably explained by the conjecture that the air6ow pattern

around point-8 is di4erent from that of the other three points The sample number is 788, and the correlation coe"cient

because of the separation or back 6ow. is 0.964, which is higher than those of the formerly stated

regression, where, Nu is the Nusselt number, Re the Reynold

Incidentally, u2 + v2 + w2 is exactly equal to the wind

number, l the length from the edge (m), and the kinematic

velocity V de=ned by Eq. (5), that can be drawn from the

coe"cient of viscosity (m2 s−1 ).

parameters in the k– model.

Consequently, CHTC can be expressed as the following

V = uS 2 + vS2 + wS 2 + 2k; (5) equation, which is derived from Eq. (7) which substituted

the Prandtl number of air calculated at 20◦ C.

0:891

where, k: turbulent energy. −0:109

h = 11:42 · l · 2 2

u +v +w 2 : (9)

Then, if we assume V as an explanatory variable to estab-

lish a regression line, it may be suitable for the wall function

for the k– model. This equation may be applied to both the horizontal and

Fig. 16 shows the relation of u2 + v2 + w2 to CHTC vertical envelope with any representative length.

in survey-2 with the data of survey-1. You can con=rm the

same relationship in survey-2, even though there were two 4.4. Discussion

di4erent wind directions. However, the slope of survey-2

is larger than that of survey-1b, and the CHTC at the wind Looking over the result of survey-1b, we can reach an

velocity of 1:5 m=s in survey-2 is almost twice that in interesting conclusion;

survey-1b. The regression for survey-2 is as follows:

• The CHTC of three points; point-7, point-9, and point-14,

can be expressed by Eq. (4), even though there are dif-

h = 10:21 u2 + v2 + w2 + 4:47: (6) ferent representative lengths de=ned by the distance from

the edge.

The number of data points is 71, and the correlation coe"-

• The feature of CHTC of point-8 near the parapet is dif-

cient is 0.935.

ferent from the other points.

4.3. Analysis using dimensionless numbers Therefore, Eq. (4) can be applied to the area where the tur-

bulent boundary layer is su"ciently developed, but it cannot

Fig. 17 shows the relationship between the Reynolds num- be applied to the area with separation or back 6ow.

ber Re and the Nusselt number Nu of all the measured data, Eq. (9) presents a contrary fact in the sense that the CHTC

which include the data set of point-8 which has two di4er- increases with the decrease of the length from the edge. In

ent tendencies, as indicated in Fig. 15. The representative contrast, Eq. (9) presents that the CHTC increases with the

lengths of the Re number are de=ned as the length from decrease of the length from the edge.

the edge considering the wind direction. By considering the That comes from the fact that we considered survey-1b

scale length within the Re number, you can see a similar and survey-2 at the same time. This same sort of con6ict

tendency in spite of the site di4erence, and even the wind may be caused by the fact that the representative length in

direction di4erence. The regression of all those data based survey-2 is much smaller than in survey-1b.

A. Hagishima, J. Tanimoto / Building and Environment 38 (2003) 873 – 881 881

5. Conclusion References

In order to establish a comprehensive and qualitative pre- [1] Yoshida S, Murakami S, Mochida A, et al. In6uence of green

diction for CHTC on various urban canopy surfaces, a series area ratio on outdoor thermal environment with coupled simulation

of outdoor experiments were precisely reported. of convection, radiation and moisture transport. AIJ Journal of

Architecture Planning and Environmental Engineering 2000;529:

First, simultaneous multi-point measurements of all the

77–84 (in Japanese with English abstract).

surface 6uxes, except for the convective element, primar- [2] Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering, JSME data book heat

ily indicated the horizontal distribution of the CHTC. Next, transfer, 4th ed., MARUZEN Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 1996.

the relationship between the wind velocity and CHTC were [3] Cole RJ, Sturrock NS. The convective heat exchange at the external

examined based on the measurement of the turbulent statis- surface of buildings. Building and Environment 1977;12:207–14.

[4] Urano Y, Watanabe T. Heat balance at a roof surface and time-varying

tical values on a rooftop slab and the vertical wall of a test

e4ect of the =lm coe"cient on its thermal response. AIJ Journal

dwelling, being di4erent in both scale and wind direction of Architecture Planning and Environmental Engineering 1983;325:

against the surfaces. 93–103.

Consequently, we were able to obtain a regressive rela- [5] Kagawa H, Katayama T, Hayashi T, Tanimoto J. Experimental study

tion expressed by Eqs. (4) and (7). The representative ve- on hygrothermal properties of lawn and soil surfaces, Proceedings of

ISES 1997 Solar World Congress, Taejon, Korea, (CD-Rom version),

locity of these equations was de=ned at a height of 13 cm

1997.

from the building surfaces based on the measurement data. [6] Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Katayama T, Nishiyama T. Long-term

Therefore, the proposed relation seemed to be suitable for =eld measurement on heat transfer coe"cient and heat balance on

CFD calculation by the k– model. grassland surface. AIJ Journal of Technology 2000;11:155–60.

[7] Narita K, Nonomura Y, Ogasa A. Real scale measurement of

convective mass transfer coe"cient at window in natural wind. AIJ

Journal of Architecture Planning and Environmental Engineering

Acknowledgements

1997;491:49–56.

[8] Barlow JF, Belcher E. The resistance network for transfer from

The authors would like to express special thanks to street canyons, AMS Proceedings of Fourth Symposium on the Urban

Dr. Prof. Tadahisa Katayama and Mr. Kouji Tsukimatsu Environment, Norfolk, USA, 2002. p. 113– 4.

for their assistance. [9] Narita K, Nonomura Y, Ogasa A. Wind tunnel test on convective

mass transfer coe"cient on urban surface study on convective heat

This research was partially supported by the Japan Sci-

transfer coe"cient on outside building wall in an urban area part.2.

ence and Technology Corporation, Grant-in-Aid for CREST, AIJ Journal of Architecture Planning and Environmental Engineering

Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology. 2000;527:69–76.

- heat transgerUploaded byShusha Shomali
- MTV 410 Semester Test 2 April 2012Uploaded byWesley Botha
- ASTM C177Uploaded byAngel Egoavil Rosas
- Calculation of the Heat Transfer Surface Area of Heat Exchangers for Waste Heat Recovery with the Kaline CycleUploaded byIJAERS JOURNAL
- heat TransferUploaded byV Dhinakaran
- Numerical Modeling of Wire and Tube Condenser Used in Domestic RefrigeratorsUploaded bybeazenha
- Heat Transfer College slidesUploaded byVivaan Sharma
- Mef 2Uploaded byYosef Romania
- WindSonic DatasheetUploaded byjack
- Effects of Wind on Tower CranesUploaded byjapv_pas
- Thermal Resistance of Steam Condensation in Horizontal Tube BundlesUploaded byRavinder Singh
- Energy Management Quiz-2Uploaded byMuthuMuthu
- Tutorial 3Uploaded bymeansamin
- L_10Uploaded byamaniamoon
- 2 Heat Transfer AnalysisUploaded byS.m. Moniruzzaman
- PDF 00004Uploaded bytfemilian
- Le Ngoc Lieu_lecture 1_chapter 1Uploaded bylieu_hyacinth
- AM-4206.pdfUploaded bywilliamb285
- HMT PaperUploaded byImranFazal
- 19414Uploaded bykalai
- 0aa211c7f506bb7352a3ff4d2574573b688aUploaded byDilip
- A mathematical model to investigate on the thermal performance.pdfUploaded byAbubakkar Siddiq
- New Microsoft Word Document (10)Uploaded byravi
- 2007 Jht Flow BoilingUploaded bySaif Evony
- Last AssignmentUploaded byRanger Rahul
- Fin PerformanceUploaded byVijay Krishnan
- C 177 – 97 .pdfUploaded byingluisalejo
- Energy%20in%20the%20BalanceUploaded bytigin
- Helical Coil Heat ExchangerUploaded byjoh aseerk
- ESE 18 Syllabus MechUploaded bymadking987

- Guidlines Tanks of Tank InspectionUploaded byVeky Pamintu
- Vibration Signature Analysis PROC_V18Uploaded byronfrend
- PROC_V19 PL302 downloadUploaded byronfrend
- Rutina de Termografia - CarroceriasUploaded byronfrend
- Integration of safety in machine designUploaded byronfrend
- DC Motor Brush LifeUploaded byronfrend
- 3906-qep-dec11Uploaded byronfrend
- Hospital heat loss analysis Report 5 Appendix 10Uploaded byronfrend
- Spec - Thermal Imaging SystemUploaded byronfrend
- Risk Based Inspection Jacketed PlatformsUploaded byronfrend
- Hospital heat loss analysis Report 1 Appendix 6Uploaded byronfrend
- 450OILUploaded byronfrend
- MV VFD SpecUploaded byronfrend
- Pre Shutdown ChecklistUploaded byronfrend
- Level 3 NVQ Refinery Ops Control Room NOSUploaded byronfrend
- Thermography LimitsUploaded byronfrend
- Guardian Angel FlowchartUploaded byronfrend
- RBI and FFSUploaded byronfrend
- Trib OlogyUploaded byronfrend
- Vibration Analysis Measurement ManualUploaded byronfrend
- ISO 10816-1 normativa vibracionesUploaded byumendibil
- How to Bump Test With MicrologUploaded byYuda Satria
- Body Shop Thermography ExamplesUploaded byronfrend
- avsde4Uploaded byAsim Idrees Osman
- 10.1.1.123.8421Uploaded byjavier_valero

- LaboratoryValidationDefinitionsAndTerminologyUploaded byasad bashir
- f MatterUploaded byDiana Irimie
- Fjalor Anglisht.docxUploaded bygertjani
- Topographic Surveying (USACE)Uploaded bysteve21707366
- A Guide to Security MetricsUploaded byAvesShaikh
- KIMMUploaded byamanpss
- A 048078Uploaded byFelipe Carvajal Rodríguez
- Chapter 5Uploaded byYusuf Raharja
- ACTIVITY.docxUploaded byMelvin Cabonegro
- Bill of Principal QuantitieshighwayUploaded byAbd Aziz Mohamed
- Differential angle of arrival' Theory, evaluation, and measurement feasibilityUploaded byfractin
- Blasting Complaints Old Problem, New ApproachUploaded byTony Chan
- Chapter 10Uploaded byanil.gelra5140
- RPT-Tahun-1-Matematik-DLP-2019Uploaded byNadya Yunus
- National Metrological Infrastructure Joint Guide 1Uploaded byimran shaukat
- Goals DBIs kkkUploaded byRajanikant Tagarrati Venkata
- Measurability in EducationUploaded byEdward G. Rozycki
- interactive learning activitesUploaded byapi-375754460
- Pinna 2015Uploaded byNatan Oliveira
- designlab2 (Recuperado)Uploaded byEnrique Goldin
- Rsk Fsk Japan LevelsUploaded bymanhnguyen
- 1. IntroductionUploaded byJoyce Estrevencion
- Global Guidelines on Out-Of-home Audience MeasurementUploaded byioxir
- Christensen-Intro to Biomedical Engineering Biomechanics&Bioelectricity IUploaded byWalter Mamani Ccasa
- Extreme Measures PDFUploaded byMelinda
- Science FairUploaded byDemiana Magdy
- 140611-141901-Mechanical Measurement and MetrologyUploaded bysameer_m_dani
- Evans v Doodley j Cook d Architecture Book 1 2 2Uploaded byLourdes
- MCQ Phy 11th Units and Dimensions Test Paper 03-05-2013Uploaded byPavan Reddy
- Surveying Lecture Notes to Be Acetated-errorsUploaded byCalvin Lacson