0 Up votes0 Down votes

4 views33 pagesThesis

Aug 01, 2018

© © All Rights Reserved

DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Thesis

© All Rights Reserved

4 views

Thesis

© All Rights Reserved

- Cooperative Learning
- How to write a reflective essay
- gervs TSINA
- Ginda Maruli Andi Siregar
- Coop Learning
- classroom management plan pdf
- Cooperative Learning Classroom
- ASF Solutions One Page List of Quotations
- con - virtual learning debate prep
- FLAGSHIP PROGRAM IN MATH
- Asocopi Newsletter March 2007
- observation tool almand center 2
- perf
- teaching philosophy
- 2005_8
- lesson plan cooperative learning copy
- dt final summary
- Cooperative Grouping Working on Mathematics Homework
- a katikos resume 1-8-14
- gen ed case study

You are on page 1of 33

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Speaking is the one of productive skills that used to communicate with others.

In this skill, it is important to master fluency and accurancy, this either speaker or

(2008:19) stated that “the mastery of speaking skills in English is a priority for

taught to be more efficient to show up the student undestand. This can help the

students find some problem to make communication well. Based on the result of

obsevarvation there are several problems the students in speaking class. First of

all, students do not know how to express their idea in English, the students know

how to express their idea in English. Actually, they have an idea in their mind, but

they cannot say it because they do not know how to express their idea in English.

Second, students are the lack of self-confidence in speaking English. Mairi (2017)

said that “it is not meaning-focus tasks, this kind of task may lead them to lack of

speaking English. Most of the students are not brave and confident and feel

inferior to her/his friends because she/he does not believe in her/his abilities.

Third, students embarrassed and scared when they speak, the students not

embarrassed and scared when they speak with each other. Most of the students

will feel awkward when they speak, especially in front of the public because they

do not have abilities to speak English when they communicate each other because

of the lack of vocabulary that make each other misunderstood. Fourth, students

bored with what is taught by the teacher in learning English. To solve these four

English as we know, there are a lot of factors that make students do not interested

in teaching and learning process because their teacher always uses the same

methods in the teaching and learning English that is a conventional method. One

of the techniques is Make a Match. So, there are some reasons why Make a Match

In order to solve the problem, the teacher should give some problem solving

so that, the students can easily understand. The researcher give a solution that a

teaching at SMPN 10 Konawe Selatan. The researcher believe the Make a Match

Teachnique is one of English teaching and developed by Lorna Curran and It has

been applied for almost twenty years. Suyanto (2009:72) stated that “the make a

match is a learning process where the teacher prepares the cards contain the

question and prepare the answer cards then the students look for the pair cards”.

Make a Match Teachnique suppresse the human being as a social creature. Thus,

Wahab (2007:59) make a match is the learning system that prioritizes the

cultivation of social skill especially the ability to work together, the ability to

interact in addition t0 the ability to think quickly through the game looking foa a

partner with assisted cards. So that, the researcher concluded that Make a Match

foreign languange.

carry out in SMPN 10 konawe Selatan. And, this Teachnique can help the

students ability their speaking skill. So decided to decide a study entitle “ The

effect in student’s speaking skill after use Match a Make Teachnique at Eight

There are the interim answer for the research the researcher formulates the

The scope of the study focuses in the finding out the effect Make a Match

10 Konawe Selatan. In this case the students can given a cards, then students can

search for answer or questions from the card they have to speak with the other

students. In this case the teacher observe on terms of fluency and accuracy of the

students using the words in determine the answer or question of the card being in

search. The teacher give some time to students so they can speak up with others.

For the result of this research, the researcher expected that it can usefull for :

1. The Teacher

learning strategy appropriate to teach junior hight school to ability speaking skill.

The teacher teach the material by cards. So it interesting and pleasant learning in

classroom.

teaching speaking. The next researcher can development this teachnique by using

1. Cooperative Learning

team but to learn something as a team when they can work together.

via verbal

Make a Match is a teachnique when the students have to find the partner.

CHAPTER II

LITERATURE REVIEW

needed so that speaker and listener can understand what is mean and the listener

can get the point and understanding the meaning of the speech”. Wallace

when they have to pay attention what they are said. So that the student must

understand what to say and how to say it in other words students should pay

(2001:56-57) stated that speaking more complex and difficult that people assume,

and speaking study like study other cases in study of languange, naturalize many

For many years, teacher agree on the students to learn in the second

teaching is based on real life situation that require communication by using Make

with each other in the speaking skill. In brief the teacher should create a

Kayi (2006) said that teaching speaking is not like Listening, Writing, and

students should be more practice in classroom and brave for speak up. Speaking is

other word its form and meaning are dependent on the context in which in occurs,

students in real life communication. The teacher help their students to develop the

speaking ability. According to Nunan (2003), there are some principle for

as accurancy. Accurancy means using the target language correctly and fluency is

using language quickly and confidently. The teacher should not emphasize on any

one aspect of speaking. So that the Students must be getting practice on both

To improve students speaking. They should be given enough opportunities

to speak in class. In case the teacher talk time should be less and students talk

time should be more. Nunan (2003) said that “pair work and group work can be

used to increase the amount of time that learner get to speak in the target language

durring lesson”. So that the student can be sharring information and can help the

students improve the speaking skill. To improve the students speaking skill,

teacher must understand the procedure intercept about the activities in speaking.

Ur (1996:121) said that there are problem of the speaking ability of the students

follow that :

1 Inhibition

real time exposure to an audience learners are often inhibition about trying to say

fearful of criticism of losing faces, or simply shy of the attention that their speech

attracts.

2 Nothing to say

Even they are not inhibition, you often hear learners, complain that they cannot

think of anything to say, they have no motive to express themselves beyond the

Only one participant can talk at a time if she or he is to be heard, and in a large

group this is means that each one will have only very little talking time. This

In clases where all, of number of the learners share the same mother tongue they

may tend to use it because it feels an natural to speak to one another a foreign

language and because they fell less exposed if they are speaking in their mother

tongue. If they are talking in small groups it caan be quite difficult to get some

classes particularly the less disciplines or motivated ones to keep to the target

language.

essentially involves students learning from each other in groups. The importance

thing of cooperative learning is student and teacher work together. In this this

strategy, teacher teaches students cooperatively or social skill so that students can

discussed because basically students prefer small work than the individual.

Cooperative learning can also help the students more effective in solving existing

problems.

strategy that used in learning process, where students will be easier finding

problem. So that in this strategy students learn in pair work to solve given by the

teacher. Lie (2002:29) states that cooperative learning is not only learn in group

working, there are some basic substances that differ from dividing group

extensive concept includes all kinds of group working headed by teacher. It means

The teacher hasto know and apply some elements of cooperative learning. Lie

(2002:31-37) divided the elements into five, there are : interdependence, personal

1. Positive Interdependence

one effective, so each members of each group has to finish their work and the

others can achieve the goal. So, in this element there are two group

responsibilities. First, learn about the material given by teacher in group. Second,

make sure that all of member in a group learn that material. In constructing

positive interdependence, there are several ways can be done. These are growth

your students’ feeling that he or she integrate in group and students can achieve

learning goal if all of member achieve the goal, make sure that all of member get

same reward if they can achieve the goal, students have to piece together their

work, so they can finish their work, every student given interconnects and

2. Personal Responsibility

In this elements is almost the same as the firsh elements. Rresponsibility students

will appears when teacher measures how success a group is. Personal

activity. Several ways to develop this element are. These are group working not

too big, doing assessment to every student, giving assignment for students, for

presenting the assignment in front of the class teacher can choose randomly,

observing every group and recording students’ frequency in helping group, asking

her/his friend.

3. Face to Face

Every group is given chance to meet up and discussion. These activities have

also increase solving problem ability, belief one another, giving motivation to

4. Interpersonal Skill

organizing students’ activity for achieving the goal, students have to distinguish

5. Group Processing

to evaluate group working process and result of group working so they can work

in group more effective. Teachers do this want to know whether students are

helpful or not in a group working. There are many kinds of evaluation form. It

depends on education level of students. The time of evaluation can be done after

cooperative learning, there are some techniques that can be used by teacher in

cooperative learning, these are Jigsaw, Think Pair Share, Numbered Head

Together, Group Investigation, Two Stay Two Stray, Make a Match, Listening

Team, Inside Outside Circle, Bamboo Dancing, Point Counter Point, The Power

of Two.

technoques teacher divides students into some groups that a group consists of four

students. Every member in a group has to be responsible with the topic given by

teacher. Then person by person make a new group consist of two or three students

and share what they have learnt to other students in that new group (Lie, 2002:69).

Lyman develops Think Pair Share technique. In this technique, there are

three step of discussion. First, think, teacher gives question to the students and

students have to answer the question. Second, pair, in this step teacher asks the

student to discuss the answer deeply in pairs. Third, share, in this last step student

and teacher will call one by one to do task from teacher. Group Investigation is

developed by Sharan (1992). In this technique students can choose topic what

they want and develop problems from that topic. After choosing and developing

problems, teacher and students determine research method to solve the problems.

Two Stay Two Stray is also introduced by Kagan (1992) in Lie (2009:61).

Students are given problems by teacher and they have to solve the problems in

group working that consist of four students. After discussion finish, two students

from each group go to other group for sharing information. Two other students

receive guest from other group and present their group working result.

technique, teacher has to provide cards. Teacher writes some questions in that

cards and the answer in the different card. Then, teacher gives the cards to the

students and students who bring question card have to find partner with the

has to explain material to the students first. Then, teacher divides students into

some groups. First group asks question, second group answer the question and

students are given chance for sharing information in the similar time. Bamboo

Dancing is modification of Inside Outside Circle. It has same concept with Inside

many perspectives. The last is The Power of Two. In beginning, teacher ask

question to students. In this technique, students are demanded for critical thinking.

Make a Match is technique in cooperative learning that developed by Lorna

Curran (1994). When implementing this technique, teacher has to provide some

cards that consist of question complete with the answer and questioner. Suprijono,

(2009:78) said that bbefore giving these cards the teacher has to divide students

into three groups, ffirst group is students who bring the question cards, second

group is the students who bring the answers card, and third group is students as

rater. Then, the students look for their pair that appropriate with their card

quickly. Students who can find the appropriate card with their card have to show

their card to the rater. Then, rater read their card whether appropriate or not.

Teacher also determines the time. teacher can teach students in pleasing condition

because students will find their suitable card with their card in crowded situation.

It will make students enjoy in mastering material in the textbook and they never

feel bored. This technique also make students be active in the class, don’t like

when the teacher just explain and explain material will make students be passive

According to Huda (2011) using make a match has some advantages there

are: giving motivation students to help each other in teaching and learning

students for using their asking skill and discussing a problem and developing

leadership talent and teaching discussion skill. Different huda, Lie (2002:55) said

that the advantages of Make a Match are, excitement condition will grow in

dynamically, there is dynamic mutual cooperation inter students and students look

for their partner while study about concept or topic in pleasing condition.

However Chianda (2013), the advantages of Make a Match are, students directly

learning creativity, avoiding students feel bored in teaching and learning process,

learning more pleasing because of involving teaching media made by teacher and

Many school use curriculum 2013 but any other use school based curriculum. In

indonesia. In teaching english there are four skills in English such as speaking,

listening, reading and writing. When teaching speaking, teacher can integrate it

all, researcher provides some cards there are two kinds of cards. First cards

consist of some questions and second cards consist of some answers from the

question in the first card where the question is based on the material. In beginning

of instruction, teacher gives some clue to the students. The teacher invites students

to make three groups. First group will get question card, second group will get

First and second group have to find the correct answer which appropriate

with their card Students whose can find their match, then go to the rater in pair

After that rater reads their cards whether correct or not. Of course, there is limited

time determined by teacher. It means that students have to find their match

quickly. and students who cannot find their match until the time is over will get

suitable for review session, some cards are the question and some

3 Every student thinks the question or answer from the card they

held

4 Every student looks for their partner who has the appropriate card

5 Every student who can compare to the suitable card before the time

6 After one period, cards are shaken again so that every student get

7 And so on

8 Conclusion/closing.

Teachnique

The researcher find some of the advantages of this teachnique expert from

hhtp://make-match-teachnique-for-teaching-young.htm.niputuindahpertiwi (2013)

said that :

learning activities

the teacher.

The researcher find some of the disadvantages of this teachnique expert from

hhtp://make-match-teachnique-for-teaching-young.htm.niputuindahpertiwi (2013)

said that :

1. When the class is big class (more than 30 students) must be careful,

because when the teacher is not wise enough, noisy situation will

2. Difficult for teacher to prepare the cards well and good in accordance

According to Van Els et al. (1984) in yuni Amrin (2014) state that “ media are all

aids which may be used by teacher and learners to attain certain educational

objectional”. In the generall there are three kinds of instructional media. They are

audio, visual, and audio visual. Audio visual are media that can be listened to

while visual media are media that can be seen. Media has gain for teacher and

function to stimulate students can speak up in front class Levis in Junaidy (2004)

stated that there are four function of teaching media, especially visual media

nemely : (a) attentive function ; (b) aaffective function; (c) cognitif function; and

a) Affective function of visual media can be seen from the degree of student

achnievement to understand and memorize information of meaning which

research which express that visual media which give context for

understand text can help the poor students to organize information in the

Media are often expelled in very a predictable way in the classroom. Usually as

starting point for teaching speaking and one of media in teaching speaking is

cards, this concept cards can help the student learning words. The are similiar to

flash cards, but the result in students learning process that just definition. Concept

words and used the word in their own sentences. Than nasional education (2002-

ways, teacher may choose to identify words from a text for which

students will make concept cards. Students can identify new words

as they read for which they will make concept cards. The teacher

they read.

2 Write the word and sentence from the text that introduction the

they read.when they encounter a word for which they will make a

concept cards, they stop, write down the word and sentence on an

after students have finished read, they add the following information to the front

on the concept card (where the have written the word and sentence from the text).

Then Tamaraa Jones (2005) divedes two possiblities when the teacher use cards as

possibility One:

3 Students must walk around giving hints about their card, either, verbal of

Possibility Two:

2 Divide students intro group of 2-3 and give each a set of a maching

cards

To warm up

To practice minimal pairs

seen from the score obtained by students. This score can be seen as

3.315 while the T-table was 2.021. It means that T-test score was

high school.

CHAPTER III

The design of the study is pre experimental design (One group pre-tesy and post

test). One group is given pre-test before treatment and then post-test after

treatment.

Y1 X Y2

Where:

- Y1 : Pre-test

- Y2 : Post-test

-X : Treatment

3.3.1 Population

The population of the students in the eight grade of SMPN 10 Konawe Selatan

who register in academic year of 2018 / 2019. The total number of students at the

nineth grade of SMPN 10 Konawe Selatan are 139 students from 5 classes. They

are class VIIIA, VIIIB, VIIIC, VIIID, VIIIE. Population of this study can be looked

in table 3.2

1 VIII A 28

2 VIII B 29

3 VIII C 27

4 VIII D 28

5 VIII E 27

Total 139

3.3.2 sample

The sample class is eight grade student consist of one classes. In the taking the

sample the researcher applies non-purposive quota sampling. The researcher use

this technique because in that school the English teacher just given the reseacher

one of class.

The instrument of the study is oral test. The firsh meeting and the last meeting

will be used to determine the students speaking skill in fluency and accurancy

after teach by using Make a match teachnique. The researcher will used the

cards as media and the researcher will take a video of students performance in

The reseacher will use scale of Penny Ur (1996) for fluency and accuracy.

No Fluency

1 Little or no communication 1

to understand

Total of score 5

No Accuracy

4 Good range of vocabulary, occasional grammar slips, 4

Total of score 5

(Penny Ur 1996)

5 = Very good

4 = Good

3 = Moderate

2 = Poor

1 = Very poor

(Penny Ur 1996)

The score above are applied by rather for meansuring the speaking skill of

students. Score of both raters are then calculated to find out the final score. The

formula is below:

2

(Universitas of Combridge Internasional Examnitions 2011)

3.6 Pilot study

The researher will conduct the pilot study in class. In the study resercher will

conduct using the same test that will be held in pre-test and post-test. The pilot of

the study is to know how long it took the time during the process. When

conducting, the pilot study, the researcher controlled the time allocation.

In evaluating students’ speaking score, the researcher uses two raters to get

accurate data. The raters are the researcher as the first raters and the English

teacher as the second rater. Both of them use fluency and accuracy in speaking

band score. Before both raters give score for students’ performance in both pre-

test and post-test session, both raters discussed first about how to give score for

Inter rater agremeent before conducting the real activity to reach same

perception during the assesment. Both raters have similar perspective in assessing

students’ speaking skill. The researcher carry out the following procedures :

proposed by Ur (1996).

4) The result of the scoring by the two raters are discussed in order to find

out the inter rater agreement. If, there is no agreement between the two

raters, then they have to take another five speaking video to be assessed.

Where:

N = numbet of students

that, Ho is rejected.

In that, Ho is accepted.

0 0 No correlation

0,81- 0,99 (-0,81)- (-0,99) High

1 -1 Very High

(Riduwan 2008)

follows :

1. Teacher prepared some cards that contain several concept or topics are

appropriate for review session, one about the question and other part of

4. Each students matched the cards with their parther (answer and question

cards)

5. Any students is able to match the cards before the deadline will be given

point

6. After one round of cards shuffle again so that each students gets a

7. The students also able to gather with 3 students who hold suibtable cards

a) Giving Pre-test

Pre-test was aimed to know the student speaking skill before being giving the

treatment.

b) Giving Treatment

Giving treatment means that teaching and learning process under Make a

Match Teachnique. The treatnent wa conducted for four meeting by the research

herself directly. In this study, the writer us acted as a teacher. The treatment will

conduct for three meeting in each class and as can be seen in the following table:

NO Meeting Topic

congratulation card

Card

card

c) Giving Post-test

It is aimed to know the students speaking skill after the treatment of make a

Match Teachnique.

In analysis the data, the researcher will use descriptive and inferential statistic.

Descriptive statistic is used to describe the maximum and minimum scores, mean,

Before the hypothesis test is done, it will conduct the homogeneity test and

normality test of the data as the condition for testing the hypothesis.

The researcher use the criteria as follows :

- Cooperative LearningUploaded byLutfan La
- How to write a reflective essayUploaded byTaylor Boswell
- gervs TSINAUploaded bygervy1_9
- Ginda Maruli Andi SiregarUploaded byEva Puspita Sari
- Coop LearningUploaded bygenids
- classroom management plan pdfUploaded byapi-341240866
- Cooperative Learning ClassroomUploaded byApep Asur
- ASF Solutions One Page List of QuotationsUploaded byJk McCrea
- con - virtual learning debate prepUploaded byapi-259630476
- FLAGSHIP PROGRAM IN MATHUploaded byIanne Fabian
- Asocopi Newsletter March 2007Uploaded bysteamboycardona
- observation tool almand center 2Uploaded byapi-250803790
- perfUploaded bySeruzna Ishx
- teaching philosophyUploaded byapi-283897830
- 2005_8Uploaded byNopita Sari
- lesson plan cooperative learning copyUploaded byapi-301886532
- dt final summaryUploaded byapi-272005741
- Cooperative Grouping Working on Mathematics HomeworkUploaded byMaryrose
- a katikos resume 1-8-14Uploaded byapi-311949584
- gen ed case studyUploaded byapi-317738807
- Sample Action Research 2Uploaded byJong Herrera
- Cooperative or Group Learning MethodUploaded byCornelius
- an overview of cooperative learning - johnson johnsonUploaded byapi-347960439
- lesson plan artifact 3 1Uploaded byapi-343880507
- ued 495-496 hopper hannah planning preparation instruction and assessment artifact 1Uploaded byapi-345653065
- Chapter-1.pdfUploaded byHeaven Tan Chua
- Cooperative Learning AndUploaded byAndro Louis Malabarbas Rulona
- Interactive InstructionUploaded bymusodik s
- Cooperative LearningUploaded bywilly june
- Critical Review for Cooperative LearningUploaded byina

- Taylor, Diana_A_Savage_Performance__Guillermo_Gomez_Pena_and_Co.pdfUploaded byXimena Payán
- Women’s Role in Peronist ArgentinaUploaded byKenneth Jiménez Arias
- Depictions of mythologies in Gabriel Garcia Marquez’ short stories The Handsomest Drowned Man In The World and A Very Old Man with Enormous WingsUploaded byAndrew Titus
- Feeling Criminal in Macbeth.pdfUploaded byElShymaa Shehab
- René DescartesUploaded byИгор Миликић
- Objectivism, Modernism and Baudrillardist HyperrealityUploaded bybackkorn
- CCVT.pdfUploaded bysreedhar
- 8e4926aecde5f4a5e34ae5a54f195409e4f2.pdfUploaded bypoorvika gowda
- ReferencesUploaded byskkukanna8868
- feynmanotesUploaded byapi-26504090
- Defending a Higher LawUploaded byEllie Bellie
- HCA 322 (Health Care Ethics and Medical Law)Uploaded byDevry Tutorial
- Mgt602 Sample SolutionUploaded byPower Girls
- Simulado a Cobit5 InglesUploaded byWanderson Faustino
- Seventh-Day Adventism Renounced - D. M. Canright.pdfUploaded byRubem_CL
- BURNOUT AMONG TEACHERSUploaded byNurashida Halimin
- God's DetectiveUploaded byAdalsteinnEaglehawk
- Grammar for Everyone Practical Tools for Learning and Teaching GrammarUploaded byNoeliaa de la Calle
- 11th Century & TimaeusUploaded byJoe Magil
- Faith in the Divine Books (English DVD Shaikh Dr.abdullah Al-Farsi)Uploaded byZakir Naik
- Urban TypologiezUploaded byGail Voir
- Reiki - More concerning the SymbolsUploaded byJames Deacon
- PR ScottlandInternFestival NewTerritories2009Uploaded bynighb
- Development and Dependency notesUploaded byRavi Malhotra
- Adaptation of the MacArthur-Bates Galeote_2016Uploaded byPar Do
- CelebrityUploaded byTeresa Crew
- OutUploaded byErvina Tan
- 14.04.104_resumeUploaded byGhea Puspa Adyana
- Texture_Theatricality_and_Performativity.pdfUploaded byAngelina Georgieva
- 2018 Editorial Writing ConvertedUploaded byannabel b. batulan

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.