Criterion 7: Continuous Improvement (50)

Sub Criteria Evaluation Guidelines Exhibits/Context to be

M
Observed/Assessed:
7.1. Actions taken based on the results: A. Documentation of POs and PSOs attainment levels (5) Documentary evidence in respect
of each of the POs
Evaluation of each of the POs and PSOs
B. Identification of gaps/shortfalls (5)
20

C. Plan of action to bridge the gap and its Implementation (10)

7.2 During the period of Assessment:
Academic Audit
& 10
Actions taken
A. Assessment shall be based on conduct and actions taken in relation to continuous A. Academic Audit assessment
improvement (10) criteria, frequency, conduct
mechanism, action plan based on
audit, implementation and
effectiveness

7.3. Improvement : Assessment is based on improvement in: (Refer placement index 4.5) improvement considering CAYm3
(Marks to be given proportionately considering nos. in the base year CAYm3) as a base year
Placement A. Improvement in Placement numbers, quality, core hiring industry and pay packages (5) A. B. & C. Nos. in each year of the
assessment;

Higher Studies 10 B. Improvement in Higher Studies admissions for pursuing PhD. in premier institutions(3)

Entrepreneurship C. Improvement in number of Entrepreneurs (2)

7.4. Improvement in the quality:
Students admitted to the program
Total:
A. Assessment is based on improvement in terms of: A. Documentary evidence –
ranks/score in qualifying state level/national level entrances tests, percentage Physics, 1.Llist of students admitted;
Chemistry and Mathematics marks in 12th Standard and percentage marks of the lateral 2.Admission authority guidelines;
10 entry students 3.Ranks/scores;
4. comparative graph
comparative status considering
CAYm3 as a base year
50