0 views

Uploaded by Andi Amin Latif

Wall Resistance _ Open Channel

save

- HM134e
- Large Eddy Simulation of Turbine Internal Cooling Ducts
- CFD_lab1-Exercise_Note.pdf
- Experiment 4
- FM11 Manual
- MELABLABREP3
- Malvin A
- Water
- Simulation of Hydraulic Load Losses in Pepes, Using the Working Medium ADINA
- Mechanics of slow draining of large cylindrical tank under gravity
- The Reynolds Equation
- CFD Modeling of Corrugated Flexible Pipe
- Turbulence Scales
- 0103
- II 3 Handout
- Chapter 4
- MKM99
- Resistance Coefficient K for Fittings
- B.tech FM Course Plan
- oscillatory shear test method
- Tubulence Transition in Pipes
- bfs.doc
- Pressure Drop in Pipe Fittings and Valves _ Equivalent Length and Resistance Coefficient
- Tips for VOF Modelling Using Fluent
- 0493_0507
- 11 Physics Properties of Bulk Matter Test 08
- Food Colloids
- Ada 203749
- Volume issue 2013 [doi 10.1016_B978-0-12-374739-6.00013-0] Sherman, D.J. -- Treatise on Geomorphology 1.13 Sediments and Sediment Transport.pdf
- Comparacion Metodos Calculo Perdida Presion en Tuberias
- Flow Resistance of Gravel Bed Channels
- Rodrigues 2012
- rowinski2017
- Dasar Saluran Kerikil_Open Channel

You are on page 1of 8

**2016,28(3):489-496
**

DOI: 10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60653-4

**Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of mechanical energy loss and
**

wall resistance of steady open channel flow*

**Shi-he LIU (刘士和), Jiao XUE (薛娇)
**

School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China,

E-mail: shihe3086@163.com

(Received April 16, 2015, Revised March 8, 2016)

Abstract: The mechanical energy loss and the wall resistance are very important in practical engineering. These problems are

investigated through theoretical analysis and numerical simulation in this paper. The results are as follows. (1) A new mechanical

energy equation for the total flow is obtained, and a general formula for the calculation of the mechanical energy loss is proposed. (2)

The general relationship between the wall resistance and the mechanical energy loss for the steady channel flow is obtained, the

simplified form of which for the steady uniform channel flow is in consistent with the formula used in Hydraulics deduced by π

theorem and dimensional analysis. (3) The steady channel flow over a backward facing step with a small expansion ratio is numerica-

lly simulated, and the mechanical energy loss, the wall resistance as well as the relationship between the wall resistance and the

mechanical energy loss are calculated and analyzed.

Key words: channel flow, energy equation, mechanical energy loss, resistance

**Introduction and the position of the maximum velocity will be
**

Channel flows are gravity driven flows, with lowered if the flow depth is below 50%. The wall

viscous resistance and form resistance at the channel friction and the Manning coefficients also differ from

wall to induce mechanical energy loss when the liquid the generally estimated values as the flow depth is

flows downstream. The mechanical energy loss and reduced by 50%. Patnaik et al.[8] conducted experime-

the wall resistance are important issues in Hydraulics nts in highly sinuous trapezoidal meandering channels

and Engineering Fluid Mechanics, as well as in to investigate the effect of the aspect ratio and the

practical engineering. The wall resistance was studied sinuosity on the wall resistance under the smooth and

by experiments[1,2], numerical simulations[3,4] and theo- rigid bed condition. The percentage of the shear force

retical analyses[5,6] since the pioneering work of the on the inner wall, the outer wall and the bed were

famous German scholar, Prandtl. estimated and the experimental data were used to

Among the experimental studies, Knight and establish an equation for the percentage of the total

Sterling[1] conducted experiments to determine the wall shear force, which is more consistent and covers

distribution of the boundary shear stress, which, they a wider range of aspect ratio than available ones. The

found, was related to the shape of the secondary flow wall resistance was also studied by numerical simula-

cells while the shape of the secondary flow cells was tions. Cacqueray et al.[3] investigated the shear stress

decided by the aspect ratio. Yoon et al.[7] studied the in a smooth rectangular channel by numerical simula-

velocity distribution and the resistance coefficient with tions and it is shown that the stress associated with the

circular flume experiments. It is shown that the flow secondary flow and the shear stress on the interface

depth significantly affects the velocity distribution. could not be neglected and the provided division lines

The ratio of mean to maximum velocities will reduce match well with the existing results. Berlamont et al.[9]

studied the shear stress distribution in circular channels

by numerical simulations, focusing on the effect of the

* Biography: Shi-he LIU (1962-), Male, Ph. D., Professor aspect ratio, the velocity distribution and the wall

roughness on the stress distribution. The computatio-

nal fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to determine the

490

**distribution of the bed and sidewall shear stresses in
**

trapezoidal channels by Ansari et al.[10] and the effects

of the slant angle of the side walls, the aspect ratio and

the composite roughness on the shear stress distribu-

tion were analyzed. The stress associated with the

secondary flow and the shear stress on the interface

are the main contributions. The distribution of the

shear stress on the boundaries is considerably influe-

nced by the variation of the slant angle and the aspect

ratio, especially for low aspect-ratio channels. Stoesser

et al.[11] calculated the turbulent flow in a meandering

channel with the steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-

Fig.1 The sketch of open channel flow

Stokes equations (RANS) code based on an isotropic

turbulence closure and the large eddy simulation (LES)

code, respectively and the results were compared with

1. Improved mechanical energy equation for steady

the previous ones. It is shown that the RANS code

channel flow

ove-predicts the size and the strength of the secondary

We consider the steady channel flow of a control

cell while the LES code is better in the secondary cell

prediction. However, the wall shear stresses obtained volume V as shown in Fig.1, with the outer bounda-

by the LES code and the RANS code agree well ries S composed of two cross-sections S1 and S2 at

though the secondary cells have a great influence on its upstream and downstream positions with a distance

the distribution of the wall shear stress. In addition, L between them, the channel wall S31 and the free

the wall resistance was studied by analytical methods. surface S32 . For the statistically steady turbulent flow

For example, Guo and Julien[12] discussed the wall

shear stress and Yang and Lim[13] discussed this paper, of homogeneous incompressible liquid of density ρ

subsequently. Khodashenas et al.[14] made a compari- in the gravitational field, the mean surface force Tij =

son among six methods for the determination of the

boundary shear stress distribution. There were a few − pδ ij + τ ij , where p and τ ij are the mean pressure

investigations of the wall mechanical energy loss. Liu and the mean viscous shear stress respectively can be

et al.[15,16] established a mechanical energy equation expressed by using the Reynolds averaged equation

for the total flow of incompressible homogeneous (Eq.(7) of this paper) as

liquid in pipes and open channels, and the expressions

for the mechanical energy loss were suggested based ∂ui u j

∂ (Tij ui ) ∂ ui′u ′j

on a theoretical analysis. In Ref.[16] the effect of the = Tij sij + ρ ui − fi + (1)

aspect ratio and the Reynolds number on the mechani- ∂x j ∂x j ∂x j

cal energy loss in open channels was studied numeri-

cally, and it is shown that in a laminar flow, the

where ui , sij and fi are the mean velocity, the rate

coefficient of the mechanical energy loss decreases

with the increase of the aspect ratio and the Reynolds of the mean deformation and the unit mass force,

number, yet in a turbulent flow, this coefficient tends respectively. We have

to be independent of the aspect ratios as long as the

Reynolds number is large enough. Nevertheless, the ∂

− ρ ui fi = [ ρ ui ( g x3 cos θ − g x1 sin θ )] (2a)

mechanical energy defined in Ref.[16] includes the ∂xi

mean turbulent kinetic energy, which is difficult to

determine in practical engineering now and the rela-

tionship between the wall resistance and the mechani- Tij sij = τ ij sij (2b)

cal energy loss is not available.

Thence in this paper the investigations are focu-

∂ui u j ∂ 1

sed on the following points: (1) A new mechanical ρ ui = ρ ui u j u j (2c)

energy equation for the total flow is proposed by defi- ∂x j ∂xi 2

ning the mechanical energy as the sum of the potential

energy of gravity, the potential energy of surface force Therefore, Eq.(1) can be simplified further as

and the mean kinetic energy. (2) The general relation-

ship between the wall resistance and the mechanical

∂ ps 1

energy loss in open channel flows is analyzed, and ρ ui g x3 cos θ − g x1 sin θ + + u j u j =

further discussed for the steady uniform flow and the ∂xi ρ 2

steady flow over a backward-facing step.

491

∂ ps 2 p

− (2 µ sij − ρ ui′u ′j ) sij + [− ( p − ps )ui + ρ gQ z2 + − z1 − s1 (5a)

∂xi ρg ρg

**(2 µ sij − ρ ui′u ′j )u j ] (3) where Q is the flow discharge, z is the vertical
**

distance between the special point on the cross section

In Eqs.(2) and (3), µ is the dynamical viscosity of the and the base level, i.e., the horizontal level and ps is

liquid, θ is the angle between x1 axis and the hori- the static pressure at that point. The indexes 1 and 2

are used to represent the corresponding quantities on

zontal plane, − ρ ui′u ′j is the Reynolds stress, and g the cross sections S1 and S2 , respectively. Using A

is the gravity acceleration. It should be noticed that and U to represent the area and the mean velocity of

the mean pressure p is not always equal to the static the cross-section, and defining the kinetic energy

pressure ps in the turbulent flow field due to seco- correction coefficients α1 and α 2 such that

ndary flows and the anisotropic turbulent diffusion.

The boundary conditions for the steady channel

1 1 = α1QU1 = − ∫∫ ui u j ui n j d A ,

α1 AU 3 2

flow are: on the channel wall S31 the mean velocity S1

**is zero, which is the so called no-slip condition, on the
**

free surface S32 , where x3 = η , the kinematic boun- α 2 A2U 23 = α 2 QU 22 = ∫∫ ui u j ui n j d A

dary condition is ui η ni = 0 , where ni is the unit S2

**vector in the outward direction of the normal line on
**

We have

S32 , the dynamical boundary conditions mean that

there exist no shear stresses and the normal stress is

just the atmospheric pressure. The above dynamical ∫∫ ρ u u u

S

i j j ni d A = ρ Q (α 2U 22 − α1U12 ) (5b)

boundary conditions on the free surface are reasonable

in the case that the relative velocity between the liquid Therefore if we further define

and the air is not so large and the effect of the surface

tension can be neglected. ρ gQhw = ∫∫∫ (2 µ sij − ρ ui′u ′j ) sij dV (5c)

Integrating Eq.(3) over the control volume, by V

transforming the volume integral into the surface inte-

gral using the Gaussian Theorem, we have ρ gQhms = ∫∫ [( p − ps )ui − (2 m sij − ρ ui′u ′j )u j ]ni d A (5d)

S

ps 1

∫∫S g x3 cosθ − g x1 sin θ + ρ + 2 u j u j ⋅

Equation (4) can be simplified as

ps1 α U2 p α U2

( ρ ui ni )d A = − ∫∫∫ (2 µ sij − ρ ui′u ′j ) sij dV + z1 + + hms1 + 1 1 = z2 + s 2 + hms 2 + 2 2 + hw

V ρg 2g ρg 2g

(6)

∫∫ [−( p − p )u

S

s i + (2 µ sij − ρ ui′u ′j )u j ]ni d A (4)

where hms is the potential energy deviation resulted

from the different surface forces in the static liquid

Now let us consider the integral terms in Eq.(4). and the moving liquid on the cross section, and it is

Since for a static pressure field, g x3 cos θ − called the surface force potential energy deviation

g x1 sin θ + ps / ρ = g z + ps / ρ is always equal to a hereafter. hw represents the mechanical energy loss

constant on any cross-section, therefore by using the for unit weight liquid in unit time while the liquid

boundary conditions on the wall and on the free surfa- flows from the cross section S1 to the cross section

ce, as well as the continuity equation Q = ∫∫ ui ni d A = S2 . It can be seen from Eq.(5c) and Eq.(6) that the

S2

mechanical energy loss is always positive, i.e., the

− ∫∫ ui ni d A , we obtain liquid would flow from the position of high mechani-

S1 cal energy to the position of low mechanical energy if

the mechanical energy for unit weight liquid in unit

ps time at the cross section is defined as z + ps / ρ g +

∫∫ g x

S

3 cos θ − g x1 sin θ +

ρ

( ρ ui ni )d A =

hms + α U 2 / 2 g .

492

**2. Formulation of the momentum equation for cous resistance, respectively, their directions are agai-
**

steady channel flow nst the flow direction, and P1 and P2 are the mean

The Reynolds averaged equation for the steady

pressure on the cross sections S1 and S2 . The mass

channel flow is

force in the direction l1 in the gravitational field is

∂ ( ρ ui u j ) ∂p ∂

= ρ fi − + (τ ij − ρ ui′u ′j ) (7)

∂x j ∂xi ∂x j ∫∫∫ ρ f l dV = ρV f l

V

i i i i = ρ V g sin θ (9e)

**Integrating Eq.(7) over the control volume V , tran- Substituting Eq.(9) into Eq.(8), we obtain the
**

sforming the volume integral into the surface integral relationship between the total resistance on the cha-

using the Gaussian Theorem and projecting the inte- nnel wall Fb1 + Fb 2 and the mechanical energy loss,

gral result in the direction of li , we have

hw as

∫∫ ρ u u l n dA = ∫∫∫ ρ f l dV −

S

i j i j ∫∫ pl n d A + V

i i

S

i i

Fb1 + Fb 2 =

ρ gV

hw + ∑ Gm

4

(10)

L m =1

∫∫ (τ

S

ij − ρ ui′u ′j )li n j d A (8)

The wall resistance and the mechanical energy

loss are both the characteristics of the total flow in

Euation (8) is the general form of the momentum open channels, and there surely exists a certain rela-

equation for the total flow, and in this paper, only its tionship between them since the liquid flow is harmo-

nious. This relationship is given in Eq.(10), where on

longitudinal component (i.e., let i = 1 and l1 = (1, 0, 0) ) 4

is discussed. By defining the angles between the out- the right hand side, ∑G m are the resultant force of

ward directions of the normal line on S1 and S2 and m =1

**the mean pressure, the momentum variation, the resis-
**

the horizontal plane as θ1 and θ 2 , and introducing the tance caused by the mechanical energy variation and

no-slip boundary condition on the channel wall and the variation of the mean shear stress including the

the kinematic boundary condition on the free surface, viscous shear stress and the Reynolds stress, respecti-

we have vely.

∫∫ ρ u u l n dA = ∫∫ ρ u u l n dA + ∫∫ ρ u u l n dA =

S

i j i j

S2

i j i j

S1

i j i j

3. Wall resistance for steady uniform channel flow

If the shape of the cross section of the open

α 2′ QU 2 cos(θ − θ 2 ) − α1′QU1 cos(θ − θ1 ) (9a) channel does not change along the longitudinal dire-

ction and the channel is straight and long enough, the

flow in it will be steady and uniform. In this case we

∫∫ (− ρ u′u′ )l n d A = ∫∫ (− ρ u′u′ )l n d A +

S

i j i j

S2

i j i j have for Eq.(10): Fb1 = 0 , Fb 2 = τ 0 A0 , A0 = χ L ,

V = AL and G1 = G2 = G3 = G4 = 0 , where χ , A0

and τ 0 are the wetted perimeter, the bed area and the

∫∫ (− ρ u′u′ )l n d A

i j i j (9b)

S1 wetted perimeter averaged shear stress, hereafter refe-

rred to as the mean shear stress, respectively. Under

this condition, the mean shear stress of the steady

∫∫ pli ni dA = − Fb1 − P2 A2 cos(θ2 − θ ) + P1 A1 cos(θ1 − θ )

−

S uniform flow in open channels is simplified as

(9c)

A hw

τ0 = ρ g (11)

∫∫ τ ij li n j dA

=

S

∫∫τ

S2

ij il n j d A + ∫∫ τ ij li n j d A − Fb 2

S1

(9d) χ L

**Substituting Eq.(5c) into Eq.(11), and defining
**

In Eq.(9), α1′ and α 2′ are the corresponding mome- the coefficient of the mechanical energy loss λ as

ntum correction coefficients, Fb1 = ∫∫ pli ni d A and

S31 8R

Fb 2 = − ∫∫ τ ij li n j d A are the form resistance and the vis-

λ=

ρ AU 3 ∫∫ (2 µ s

S

ij − ρ ui′u ′j ) sij d A (12)

S31

493

**where R is the hydraulic radius. Equation (11) can where the subscripts i, j = 1, 2 . The RSM model[17] is
**

be simplified as adopted to calculate the Reynolds stress in Eq.(16),

the wall boundary condition is handled by the standa-

λ rd wall functions, and the rigid-lid hypothesis is used

τ0 = ρU 2 (13)

8 to deal with the free surface.

The governing equations are discretized by the

Equation (13) expresses the relationship between

finite volume method (FVM). The coupling relation-

the mean shear stress and the mean velocity in the

ship between the mean pressure and the mean velocity

section for the steady uniform channel flow. This

is handled with the SIMPLE scheme based on the

formula is widely used in Hydraulics, which is dedu-

collocated variable arrangement. A third-order accura-

ced based on π theorem and dimensional analysis.

cy QUICK scheme is used for the convection term

However, in this paper, it is obtained directly from the while the central difference scheme is used for the

governing equations of Fluid Mechanics. Defining the diffusion term. The algebraic equations are solved by

wall resistance coefficient for the steady uniform cha- the Gauss-Seidel iteration method in this paper.

nnel flow as c f , according to the definition we have

4.2 Verification

1 The experimental results[18] are used for verifica-

τ 0 = c f ρU 2 (14)

2 tion. The experiment was conducted in a wind tunnel.

A flat plate is put into the wind tunnel as shown in

Comparing Eq.(13) with Eq.(14), we obtain that Fig.3. The velocity over the flat plate is measured with

λ = 4c f , i.e., the coefficient of the mechanical energy the pulsed-wire anemometer, which is used to verify

loss is three times larger than the wall resistance coe- the numerical model. The computed results are well

fficient for the steady uniform channel flow. consistent with the measured ones as shown in Fig.4,

which shows that the calculated results from the

numerical model can be further used to estimate the

4. Estimation of mechanical energy loss and wall mechanical energy loss and other quantities.

resistance for steady backward-facing step flow

A sketch of the backward-facing step flow is

shown in Fig.2, where ∆ is the height of the step, H

is the water depth of the downstream uniform flow,

and the expansion ratio ∆ / H is used to represent the

step change. In view of the scope, only the 2-D back-

ward-facing step flow with expansion ratio less than

5% is considered. Under this condition, the free surfa-

ce would not be influenced by the step.

Fig.3 The experimental facility[18]

Fig.2 Sketch of the backward-facing step flow

**4.1 Mathematical model and numerical calculation
**

method

The governing equations for the mean velocity

ui and the mean pressure p are as follows:

Fig.4 The verification results of the velocity distribution

∂ui

=0 (15)

∂xi 4.3 Estimation of mechanical energy loss and wall

resistance

∂ui u j 1 ∂p ∂ 2 ui ∂

= fi − +ν − (ui′u ′j ) (16) 4.3.1 Simulation conditions

∂x j ρ ∂xi ∂x j ∂x j ∂x j In the simulation, the calculation cases are as

494

**follows. The flow Reynolds number ReH = U H /ν
**

varies between 4 × 104 and 9 × 104 , and the expansion

ratio ∆ / H varies between 0.02 and 0.05. Under these

conditions, the Froude numbers of all cases are less

than 1, which shows that the flow is the subcritical

flow in all calculation cases. The cross section S1 is

in the upstream of the step with a distance of 200-500

times of the step height while the cross section S2 is

in the downstream of the step with a distance of 200-

500 times of the step height in order to make sure that

the flow in these two sections is uniform.

**Fig.5 Variation of the mechanical energy loss with the Reynolds
**

numbers and the expansion ratios Fig.7 Variations of portion of surface force potential energy

deviation in the mechanical energy excluding the gravi-

tational potential energy

**4.3.2 Mechanical energy loss and surface force pote-
**

ntial energy deviation of total flow

The mechanical energy loss hw between the

cross sections S1 and S2 is calculated based on the

simulation results and Eq.(5c) and is shown in Fig.5.

The surface force potential energy deviations of the

total flow hms1 on the cross section S1 and hms 2 on

the cross section S2 are also calculated based on the

simulation results and Eq.(5d) and are shown in Fig.6

and Fig.7. As can be seen from these figures that: (1)

the mechanical energy loss is considerably larger than

the surface force potential energy deviation under the

given conditions, and the mechanical energy loss

increases with the increase of the Reynolds numbers

and the expansion ratios, (2) the surface force pote-

ntial energy deviation increases with the increase of

the Reynolds number and decreases with the increase

of the expansion ratio, and (3) the portion of the surfa-

ce force potential energy deviation in the mechanical

energy excluding the gravitational potential energy is

very small, and can be ignored in this condition.

Fig.6 Variations of the surface force potential energy deviation

4.3.3 Wall resistance

between static liquid and moving liquid with the

Reynolds numbers and the expansion ratios The wall resistance between the cross sections S1

495

**and S2 includes the form resistance and the viscous 4
**

in Fig.9. As can be seen from Fig.9 that L ∑ Gm /

resistance, calculated from the simulation results, and m =1

the variations of the resistance forces against the ρ gHV remains constant as the Reynolds number

Reynolds numbers and the expansion ratios are shown

changes for the given expansion ratio, and increases

in Fig.8. As can be seen from Fig.8 that: (1) the

linearly with the increase of the expansion ratio.

viscous resistance is much smaller than the form resi-

stance under given conditions, (2) the viscous resista-

nce increases with the increase of the Reynolds number

and decreases with the increase of the expansion ratio,

(3) the form resistance decreases with the increase of

the Reynolds number, and increases with the increase

of the expansion ratio.

4

Fig.9 Variation of L ∑ Gm / ρ gHV against the Reynolds

m =1

numbers and the expansion ratios

5. Conclusions

The mechanical energy loss and the wall resista-

nce are investigated through theoretical analysis and

numerical simulation in this paper. The following con-

clusions are drawn for the steady flow in open channe-

ls.

(1) A new mechanical energy equation for the

total flow is obtained by defining the mechanical

energy as the sum of the potential energy of gravity,

the potential energy of surface force and the mean

kinetic energy as in Hydraulics. The formula for the

mechanical energy loss of the total flow is derived

exactly while in Hydraulics it is determined empirica-

lly or experimentally.

Fig.8 Variations of resistance forces with the Reynolds numbe- (2) The general relationship between the wall

rs and the expansion ratios resistance and the mechanical energy loss for steady

channel flows is obtained by theoretical analysis, the

4.3.4 The relationship between wall resistance and simplified form of which for the steady uniform cha-

mechanical energy loss of total flow nnel flow is in consistent with the formula used in

Equation (10) shows that the wall resistance of Hydraulics deduced by π theorem and dimensional

the total flow between the cross sections S1 and S2 is analysis.

(3) The steady channel flow over a backward

approximately proportional to the mechanical energy

facing step with a small expansion ratio is numerically

loss. By converting Eq.(10) to its dimensionless form,

simulated, and the mechanical energy loss, the wall

we have

resistance as well as the relationship between the wall

4 resistance and the mechanical energy loss are calcula-

L ∑ Gm ted and analyzed based on the simulation results.

L hw

( Fb1 + Fb 2 ) = + m =1 (17)

ρ gHV H ρ gHV

References

4

The variations of L ∑ Gm / ρ gHV against the [1] KNIGHT D. W., STERLING M. Boundary shear in circu-

m =1

lar pipes running partially full[J]. Journal of Hydraulic

Reynolds number and the expansion ratios are shown Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 126(4): 263-275.

496

**[2] CHEN Xiao-fang, HE Jian-jing. Experimental study on [11] STOESSER T., RUETHER N. and OLSEN N. R. B.
**

bed shear stress in smooth open channels[J]. Journal of Calculation of primary and secondary flow and boundary

Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2007, 35(6): 704- shear stresses in a meandering channel[J]. Advances in

708(in Chinese). Water Resources, 2010, 33(2): 158-170.

[3] CACQUERAY N. D., HARGREAVES D. M. and [12] GUO J., JULIEN P. Y. Shear stress in smooth rectangular

MORVAN H. P. A computational study of shear stress in open-channel flows[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Enginee-

smooth rectangular channels[J]. Journal of Hydraulic ring, ASCE, 2005, 131(1): 30-37.

Research, 2009, 47(1): 50-57. [13] YANG S. Q., LIM S. Y. Discussion of “Shear stress in

[4] KNIGHT D. W., OMRAN M. and TANG X. Modeling smooth rectangular open-channel flows” by Junke Guo

depth-averaged velocity and boundary shear in trapezoidal and Pierre Y. Julien[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Enginee-

channels with secondary flows[J]. Journal of Hydraulic ring, ASCE, 2006, 132(6): 629-632.

Engineering, ASCE, 2007, 133(1): 39-47. [14] KHODASHENAS S. R., ABDERERRZAK K. E. K. and

[5] CHENG N. S. Resistance coefficients for artificial and PAQUIER A. Boundary shear stress in open channel flow:

natural coarse-bed channels: alternative approach for A comparison among six methods[J]. Journal of Hydrau-

large-scale roughness[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Enginee- lic Research, 2008, 46(5): 598-609.

ring, ASCE, 2015, 141(2): 04014072. [15] LIU Shi-he, XUE Jiao and FAN Min. The calculation of

[6] HU Xu-yue, ZENG Guang-ming and HUANG Guo-he et mechanical energy loss for incompressible steady pipe

al. Study on the boundary shear stress in rectangular open flow of homogeneous fluid[J]. Journal of Hydridynami-

channels[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2002, (4): cs, 2013, 25(6): 912-918.

42-47(in Chinese). [16] LIU Shi-he, FAN Min and XUE Jiao. The mechanical

[7] YOON J., SUNG J. and LEE M. H. Velocity profiles and energy equation for total flow in open channels[J]. Jour-

friction coefficients in circular open channels[J]. Journal nal of Hydridynamics, 2014, 26(3): 416-423.

of Hydraulic Research, 2012, 50(3): 304-311. [17] LIU Shi-he, LIU Jiang and LUO Qiu-shi et al. Enginee-

[8] PATNAIK M., PATRA K. C. and KHATUA K. K. et al. ring turbulence[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press,

Modelling boundary shear stress in highly sinuous mean- 2011(in Chinese).

dering channels[J]. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Enginee- [18] DURST F., LAUNDER B. C. and SCHMIDT F. W.

ring, 2014, 20(2): 161-168. Turbulent shear flows I[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany:

[9] BERLAMONT J. E., TROUW K. and LUYCKX G. Shear Springer-Verlag, 1979, 198-207.

stress distribution in partially filled pipes[J]. Journal of

Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2003, 129(9): 697-705.

[10] ANSARI K., MORVAN H. P. and HARGREAVES D. M.

Numerical investigation into secondary currents and wall

shear in trapezoidal channels[J]. Journal of Hydraulic

Engineering, ASCE, 2011, 137(4): 432-440.

- HM134eUploaded bys_nimalan
- Large Eddy Simulation of Turbine Internal Cooling DuctsUploaded byAmmar Bany Ata
- CFD_lab1-Exercise_Note.pdfUploaded bySaad Al Hely
- Experiment 4Uploaded byswaroop_exlnc
- FM11 ManualUploaded bySyafiq Izzuddin
- MELABLABREP3Uploaded byJerlah Ramos
- Malvin AUploaded byhthiruthonder
- WaterUploaded byjaris_siraj
- Simulation of Hydraulic Load Losses in Pepes, Using the Working Medium ADINAUploaded byRichard Velasquez
- Mechanics of slow draining of large cylindrical tank under gravityUploaded byReliusman Dachi
- The Reynolds EquationUploaded byr27kumar
- CFD Modeling of Corrugated Flexible PipeUploaded byLakshmiprasad Kadari
- Turbulence ScalesUploaded byAhmed Valentin Kassem
- 0103Uploaded bySajid
- II 3 HandoutUploaded byPragya Dixit
- Chapter 4Uploaded byMichael Gonzales
- MKM99Uploaded bystathiss11
- Resistance Coefficient K for FittingsUploaded byAzar Deen
- B.tech FM Course PlanUploaded byAnonymous e9EIwbUY9
- oscillatory shear test methodUploaded byshreedharkoilekar
- Tubulence Transition in PipesUploaded byEdgar Vazquez Madrid
- bfs.docUploaded byAbdul Hadi Hanif
- Pressure Drop in Pipe Fittings and Valves _ Equivalent Length and Resistance CoefficientUploaded bylethanhvan186
- Tips for VOF Modelling Using FluentUploaded bysurefooted1
- 0493_0507Uploaded byChAdnanUlQamar
- 11 Physics Properties of Bulk Matter Test 08Uploaded byRahul Gupta
- Food ColloidsUploaded bythelma00
- Ada 203749Uploaded byabhi71127112
- Volume issue 2013 [doi 10.1016_B978-0-12-374739-6.00013-0] Sherman, D.J. -- Treatise on Geomorphology 1.13 Sediments and Sediment Transport.pdfUploaded byAlirezaKhoshkonesh
- Comparacion Metodos Calculo Perdida Presion en TuberiasUploaded byEdu Cordon