Assignment Instructions for COMPANY LAW CA-3

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CA 3: ASSIGNMENT TO BE SUBMITTED ON 11/09/2018

This is to inform all that CA 3 is an Assignment.

1. The analysis and conclusion/recommendations/suggestions in the assignment has to be strictly original

and can be checked for plagiarism/similarity index at the discretion of the faculty. This CA cannot be just
informative and necessarily has to contain original analysis, conclusion/recommendations/suggestions
else marks will be deducted if analytical approach is not followed.
2. Topics assigned can be the same as allotted for TP with more elaboration and extensive research or can be
changed to any other relevant contemporary topic but subject to my approval for the change and only
after sending a proper email in this regard. Those who have still not presented the CA 2 will still have to
submit the CA 3 and treat it as a separate test and follow the required protocols as an assignment CA and
submit it on time. Those who have chosen to not appear for CA 2 can still submit the CA 3 as an
assignment and this shall be evaluated like a separate CA.
3. The core content- draft has to be of 5 to 15 pages [Garamond, font size 12, line spacing 1.5] and has to be
submitted before 3PM in hard copy to me on 11/09/2018.Proxy submissions are allowed for class mates
not in campus subject to strict adherence of timeline. Students not in campus must ensure timely hard
copy submission through their friends/classmates in campus. No extension for what so ever reason shall
be entertained.
4. The draft also needs to be submitted in soft copy with subject title “COMPANY LAW ONE ASSIGNMENT”
latest by 11/09, 11.59 PM.
EMAIL ID: varendyam@nlujodhpur.ac.in as well as varendyam18@gmail.com
5. Topics have been allotted keeping in mind the contemporary nature and recent trends. Currents events
and developments in the country and globally, related to business. Hence give a good research.
6. The format for the assignment is given below.

Thank you, looking forward for a timely and original submission. Give your best, do a good research. Your honest
efforts shall receive due appreciation in the form of good marks.

ALL THE BEST!

FORMAT:

1. Cover page.
2. Title
3. Abstract/Executive Summary – This shall contain a brief outline of the entire work.
4. Part I – Introduction
5. Part II- Content “Topic Name” [ The informative part – where you will deal with information relevant to the
topic , its scope and content]
6. Part III- Analysis of the information/Provision/Case stated
7. Recommendations/ Suggestions
8. Conclusion- based on your conclusion and suggestion what is the final conclusion from your side.
9. Bibliography and Literature review

[Citation format- has to be Bluebook 19th/20th Edition] Kindly find the attachments. Also you can refer to my
assignment of PhD which I had forwarded earlier.
Headings have to be of Centre alignment font Size 14.
 Assignment Instructions for COMPANY LAW CA-3

This is citation as per 19th Edition for 20th Edition see PPT and my earlier email.

Abhishek Anand, Holding Corporations Directly Responsible for Their Criminal Acts: An
Argument, www.manupatra.com,(last visited on Dec 19, 2015).

Seaboard Offshore, Ltd. v. Secretary of State for Transp., (1942) 2 All. E.R. 99, 104(H.L.).

U.S. v. Gold, 734 F.2d 800 (5th Cir, 1984), U.S. v. Automatic Medical Laboratories Inc., 770 F.2d
339 (4th Cir. 1995).

Elidiana Shkira, Criminal Liability of Corporations, https://www.ssrn.com/ id2290878.pdf, (last

visited on Feb. 28, 2016).

See Definition of Corporate Criminal Liability, http://definitions.uslegal.com , (last visited on Feb.5,

2016).
Beale Sara S. and Safwat Adam G., What Developments in Western Europe Tell us about American
Critiques of Corporate Criminal Liability,89 BUFFALO CRIM. L. REV. 107-116(2004).

Udwadia Shanaira, Corporate Responsibility for International Human Rights Violations,13 SOUTH
CALIFORNIA INTERDISCIPLINARY LAW JOURNAL 359 (2004) and, Orland Leonard and Cachera
Charles, Corporate Crime and Punishment in France: Criminal Responsibility of legal Entities
under the New French Criminal Code,11 CONNECTICUT JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 114-
117(1995).

Allen v.Whitehead, (1930) 1 K.B. 211.

Tesco Supermarkets Ltd. v. Natrass, 2 W.L.R 178 (1971).
Direcotr of Public Prosecutions v. Kent & Sussex Contrractors, Ltd., (1944) K.B. 146.

BOOKS:

 K.D.GAUR, CRIMINAL LAW: CASES AND MATERIALS, (2009).

 AVTAR SINGH, COMPANY LAW, (14th Ed. 2004).

 AMANDA PINTO Q.C. & MARTIN EVANS, CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY, (2008).

TABLE OF CASES

1. Allen v. Whitehead, (1930) 1 K.B. 211.

2. A.K. Khosla v. T.S. Venkatesan, 1992) 2 Cr LJ 1448 (India).

3. Assistant Commissioner v. Velliappa Textiles Ltd, (2003) 11 SCC 405(India).

 Assignment Instructions for COMPANY LAW CA-3

4. Bank Nationalization Case, AIR 1970 SC 564.

ARTICLES:

 Abhishek Anand, Holding Corporations Directly Responsible for Their Criminal Acts: An
Argument, www.manupatra.com, (last visited on Dec 19, 2015).

 V.S. Khanna, Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve? 109 HARV. L. REV.
1477.

 M.Sivaraman, Corporate Criminal Liability as revisited by the Standard Chartered Bank

decision, 62 SEBI & CORPORATE LAWS MAGAZINE, 97-102(2005).

 Ratna R Bharamgoudar, Corporate Criminal Liability: An Overview, 27 COCHIN UNIVERSITY

L. REV. 249-264 (2003).

 Praveen Dalal, Corporate Entity In Existing Legal System; Its Rights And Liabilities Under
The Constitution And Other Enactments, 61 CORPORATE LAW ADVISER, 96-103(2004).