Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region IV –A CALABARZON Division of Quezon Tagkawayan District

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE AND COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: MT - I Position:
Bureau/Division: Division of Quezon Date of Review:

WEIGH
TIME PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual RATING
MFO KRA’s OBJECTIVES T PER SCORE
LINES Results
KRA
Q E T Ave.
BASIC PROFFESSIONAL Conducts action July to 20% 5 4 3 2 1
EDUCATION GROWTH AND research related March Action Research conducted Action Research conducted Action Research conducted Action Research Action research
SERVICES DEVELOPMENT to school and utilized division wide and utilized division wide and utilized by the school conducted but not proposal approved
concerns/ supported by the following with required evidences wide with required utilized
problems evidences: Disrtict wide evidences
within a year *Research proposal (in
complete format)
Q *Research proposal (in
complete format highlighting
findings and
recommendations)
*Proposed learning
interventions and programs
*Proposed M&E for
results/outcomes
Utilized the action research in Utilized the action research Utilized an action research Submitted an Proposed title for
E the division level in the district level in school level approved proposal action research
submitted
Action Research conducted, Action Research Action Research conducted Action Research Action Research
utilized and submitted before conducted, utilized and and utilized on due date conducted and conducted
T
the due date without revision submitted before the due utilized day late andutilized 2 days
date late
Attends April to 10 % Attended at least 5 trainings Attended 4 trainings and Attended 3 trainings and Attended 2 trainings Attended 1
seminars, March and other related activities other related activities with other related activities with and other related trainings and
workshops, with in the school year in the school year in the school year activities with in the other related
trainings within Q school year activities with in
a year (division, the school year
regional or
national)
91-100% Utilized seminar 81-90% Utilized seminar 71-80% Utilized seminar 61-70 Utilized 60 and below
workshop/trainings for workshops/ trainings for workshop trainings for seminar workshop Utilized seminar
teachers in specific learning teachers in specific teachers inspecific learning training for teachers workshop training
areas (supportedby learning areas (supported areas (supported by in specific learning for teachers in
E evidences/assessment reports by evidences assessment evidences assessment areas (supported by specific learning
reports) reports) evidence assessment areas (supported
reports) by evidence
assessment
reports)
Utilized seminar Utilized seminar Utilized seminar Utilized seminar Utilized seminar
workshop/trainings for workshop/trainings for workshop/trainings for workshop/trainings workshop/training
T teachers in specific learning teachers in specific teachers in specific for teachers in s for teachers in
areas as planned learning areas as scheduled learning areas within the specific learning specific learning
andscheduled ahead of time. within the time. adjusted schedule areas a week after
 areas 2 days after the the adjusted
adjusted schedule schedule
Serves as July to 15 % 4 Lesson Demonstrations 3 Lesson Demonstrations 2 lesson demonstration 1 lesson lesson .
demonstration March Q Served in school Served in school served in school demonstration served demonstration
teacher in school served in class
Achieved 91-100% students Achieved 81-90 % Achieved 71-80 % Achieved 61-70 % Achieved 60
performance through students performance students performance students performance below% students
E
evaluation through evaluation through evaluation throuoh evaluatipn performance
through evaluation
Demonstrated the lesson with Demonstrated the lesson Demonstrated the lesson Demonstrated the I demonstrate the
in the target time with in the adjusted with minimal assistance lesson with lesson with much
T
schedule with adjusted schedule assistance with assistance
adjusted schedule
INSTRUCTIONAL Prepares and June to 10% 91-100% prepared daily 81-90% prepared daily 71-80 % prepared daily 61-70 % prepared 60 % prepared .
COMPETENCE executed daily March lesson logs with updated lesson logs with updated lesson logs with updated daily lesson logs with daily lesson logs
logs/ lesson complete and appropriate complete and appropriate complete and appropriate updated complete and with updated
plans including instructional materials instructional materials instructional materials appropriate complete and
appropriate, Q instructional appropriate
adequate and materials instructional
updated materials
instructional
materials
91-100 % evaluated teaching 81-90% evaluated teaching 71-80 % evaluated 61-70 % evaluated 60 % evaluated
learning process through learning process through teaching learning process teaching learning teaching learning
E
results results through results process through process through
results results
91-100 % Prepared daily 81-90 % Prepared daily 71-80 % Prepared daily 61-70 % Prepared 60 %Prepared
lesson plans and with updated lesson plans and with lesson plans and with daily lesson plans daily lesson plans
complete and appropriate updated complete and updated complete and and with updated and with updated
instructional materials with in appropriate instructional appropriate instructional complete and complete and
T
the target time materials with in the target materials with in the target appropriate appropriate
time time instructional instructional
materials with in the materials with in
target time the target time
Conducted June to 10 % Conducted Remediation to 5 Conducted Remediation to Conducted Remediation to Conducted Conducted .
remedial March and above non-readers/slow 4 non-readers/slow 3 non-readers/slow readers Remediation to 2 Remediation to 1
episode classes readers in the class at readers in the class at in the class at noontime non-readers/slow non-readers/slow
Q
to non- noontime noontime readers in the class at readers in the class
readers/slow noontime at noontime
readers
91-100% evaluated students’ 81-90% evaluated 71-80% evaluated 61-70% evaluated 60 and below%
performance through result students’ performance students’ performance students’ evaluated
E through result through result performance through students’
result performance
through result
Conducted remediation to Conducted remediation to Conducted remediation to Conducted Conducted
non-reader/slow reader daily non-reader/slow reader 4 non-reader/slow reader 3 remediation to non- remediation to
T times a week. times a week. reader/slow reader 2 non-reader/slow
times a week. reader once a
week.
Attains at least March 10% Attained 90-100 % of pupil’s Attained 80-89 % of Attained 70-79 % of Attained 60-69 % of Attained 50 % of
85% of pupils performance at the end of the pupil’s performance at the pupil’s performance at the pupil’s performance pupil’s
performance at school year in terms of end of the school year in end of the school year in at the end of the performance at the
Q
the end of the promotion terms of promotion terms of promotion school year in terms end of the school
year. of promotion year in terms of
promotion
 90-100% evaluated students’ 80-90% evaluated 70-80% evaluated 60-70% evaluated 59 and below%
performance through result students’ performance students’ performance students’ evaluated
E through result through result performance through students’
result performance
through result
Evaluated studens’ Evaluated students’ with in Evaluated students’ 2 days Evaluated students’ 4 Evaluated
performance with in the target the adjusted schedule after the adjusted schedule days with in the students’ one
T
time adjusted schedule week with in the
adjusted schedule .
INSTRUCTIONAL 1. Assists June to 10 % 91-100% assisted principal in 81-90% assisted principal 71-80% assisted principal 61-70% assisted 60% assisted .
SUPERVISION principal in March instructional monitoring of in instructional monitoring in instructional monitoring principal in principal in
instructional teachers through observation. of teachers through of teachers through instructional instructional
monitoring of observation observation monitoring of monitoring of
Q teachers through teachers through
teachers
through observation observation
observation

91-100% evaluated teacher
learning process through
result, monitored teacher
instruction,conducted post
conference with
teachers,made follow-up
observation and adopted a
supervisory style that fits the
E
teachers being monitored.
Assisted principal in
instructional monitoring of
T teachers within the target
time.
Provides June to 5% 91-100 % Provided
Technical March appropriate TA
Assistance to Q appropriate TA
teachers
Supervised and extended
technical assistance in 5
teachers using localized
E monitoring tools with results.
Performed regular
instructional/supervision/tech
nical assistance within the
time.
T
81-90% evaluated teacher
learning process through
result,monitored teacher
instruction,conducted post
conference with
teachers,made follow-up
observation and adopted a
supervisory style that fits
the teachers being
monitored.
Assisted principal in
instructional monitoring of
teachers with in the
adjusted time.
81-90 % Provided
appropriate TA
Supervised and extended
technical assistance in 4
teachers using localized
monitoring tools with
results.
Performed regular
instructional/supervision/te
chnical assistance within
the adjusted schedule.
71-80% evaluated teacher 61-70% evaluated 60% evaluated
learning process through teacher learning teacher learning
result,monitored teacher process through process through
instruction,conducted post result,monitored result,monitored
conference with teacher teacher
teachers,made follow-up instruction,conducted instruction,conduc
observation and adopted a post conference with ted post
supervisory style that fits teachers,made conference with
the teachers being follow-up teachers,made
monitored. observation and follow-up
adopted a observation and
supervisory style that adopted a
fits the teachers being supervisory style
monitored. that fits the
teachers being
monitored.
Assisted principal in Assisted principal in No assistance
instructional monitoring of instructional undertaken.
teachers 2 days after the monitoring of
adjusted time. teachers 4 days after
the adjusted time
71-80 % Provided 61-70 % Provided 60% and below
appropriate TA appropriate TA provided
Supervised and extended Supervised and Supervised and
technical assistance in 3 extended technical extended technical
teachers using localized assistance in 2 assistance in 1
monitoring tools with teacher using teacher using
results. localized monitoring localized
tools with results. monitoring tools
with results.
Performed regular Performed regular Unable to provide
instructional/supervision/te instructional/supervis technical
chnical assistance with ion/technical assistance within
minimal assistance. assistance with alot the adjusted
of assistance with schedule.
lots of assistance
with the adjusted
schedule.
 Checked lesson June to 10 % Checked lesson plan/lesson Checked lesson plan/lesson Checked lesson plan/lesson Checked lesson Checked lesson .
plan/lesson logs March logs of teachers in assigned logs of 4 teachers in logs of 3 teachers in plan/lesson logs of 2 plan/lesson logs of
of teachers in grade/subject area. assigned grade/subject assigned grade/subject teachers in assigned 1 teacher in
Q
assigned area. area. grade/subject area. assigned
grade/subject grade/subject area.
area
91-100% evaluated teacher 81-90% evaluated teacher 71-80% evaluated teacher 61-70% evaluated 60% evaluated
lesson logs/lesson plan lesson logs/lesson plan lesson logs/lesson plan teacher lesson teacher lesson
E through complete parts. through complete parts through complete parts logs/lesson plan logs/lesson plan
through complete through complete
parts parts
91-100% evaluated teacher 81-90% evaluated teacher 71-80% evaluated teacher 61-70% evaluated 60% evaluated
lesson logs/lesson plan within lesson logs/lesson plan lesson logs/lesson plan 2 teacher lesson teacher lesson
the target time. within the adjusted days after the adjusted logs/lesson plan 4 logs/lesson plan 4
T
schedule. schedule. days after the days after the
adjusted schedule. adjusted schedule.
.

Ratee: Rater: