You are on page 1of 9

Department of Education

Region III
Division of Pampanga
DON JESUS GONZALES HIGH SCHOOL
Pandacaqui, Mexico, Pampanga
045-308-3099

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM


S.Y. 2017-2018

Name Of Employee: REYNIEL L. VERGARA Name of Rater: JOSEFINA M. BAYANI


Position: TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Review Period: JUNE 2017-MARCH 2018 Date of Review: APRIL 2018
Division: PAMPANGA
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

PERFORMACE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS Average


Weight Rating
MFO KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q T Score
per KRA
QUALITY I. Teaching- (25 %)
BASIC Learning
EDUCATION Process  Developed daily June 2017 - 10 % 5 - Attained the 4 4 4 0.4
lesson logs and March 2018 objective on the
instructional target date
4 - Attained the
materials to adapt
objective 1-2 days
the curriculum to after the target date
the needs of the 3 - Attained the
learners. objective 3-4 days
after the target date
2 - Attained the
objective 5-6 days
after the target date
1 - Attained the
objective 7-8 days
after the target date
 Facilitated June 2017 - 10 % 5 - Attained the 5 5 5 0.5
learning through March 2018 objective on the
LP/DLL, target date
4 - Attained the
upgraded objective 1-2 days
modules, after the target date
teaching guides 3 - Attained the
(TG) with objective 3-4 days
adequate 5 after the target date
2 - Attained the
differentiated
objective 5-6 days
instructional after the target date
materials for the 1 - Attained the
curriculum year. objective 7-8 days
after the target date

II. Student’s 30 %
Outcome

June 2017 -
 Conducted
March 2018 10 % 5- Conducted 5 and more 5 - Attained the 4 4 4 0.4
remediation remediation objective on the
classes/enrichmen classes/enrichment target date
t activities for activities for learners-at- 4 - Attained the
learners-at-risk. risk objective 1-2 days
4- Conducted 4 after the target date
remediation 3 - Attained the
classes/enrichment objective 3-4 days
activities for learners-at- after the target date
risk 2 - Attained the
3- Conducted 3 objective 5-6 days
remediation after the target date
classes/enrichment 1 - Attained the
activities for learners-at- objective 7-8 days
risk after the target date
2- Conducted 2
remediation
classes/enrichment
activities for learners-at-
risk
1- Conducted 1
remediation
classes/enrichment
activities for learners-at-
risk

 Maintained June 2017 -


updated students March 2018 10 % 5 -5 indicators were 5 - Attained the 4 4 4 0.4
accomplished objective on the
school records,
4- 4 indicators were target date
submitted grade accomplished 4 - Attained the
sheets and 3 - 3 indicators were objective 1-2 days
accurate e-class accomplished after the target date
records on time, 2 - 2 indicators were 3 - Attained the
recognizing accomplished objective 3-4 days
learners’ 1 – 1 indicator was after the target date
accomplished 2 - Attained the
achievements objective 5-6 days
quarterly and after the target date
consistent 1 - Attained the
communication objective 7-8 days
with parents after the target date
regarding
learners’
performances

 Achieved the June 2017 -


target MPS of 60 March 2018 10% 5 – Attained 60% and 5 - Attained the 4 4 4 0.4
% for the above MPS objective on the
learning. 4 - Attained 50 - 55 % target date
MPS 4 - Attained the
3 - Attained 45 – 50 % objective 1-2 days
MPS after the target date
2 - Attained 40 – 45 % 3 - Attained the
MPS objective 3-4 days
1 – Attained 35 – 40 % after the target date
MPS
2 - Attained the
objective 5-6 days
after the target date
1 - Attained the
objective 7-8 days
after the target date

III.
Community 15 %
Involvement
a. Conducted June 2017 - 5% 5-Conducted 5 Parents 5 - Attained the 4 4 4 .2
periodic Parents March 2018 TeachersConference for objective on the
Teachers the school year 2016-2017 target date
4-Conducted 4 Parents 4 - Attained the
Conference.
TeachersConference for objective 1-2 days
the school year 2016- after the target date
2017 3 - Attained the
3-Conducted 3 Parents objective 3-4 days
TeachersConference for after the target date
the school year 2016 2 - Attained the
2017. objective 5-6 days
2-Conducted 2 Parents after the target date
TeachersConference for 1 - Attained the
the school year 2016 objective 7-8 days
2017 after the target date
1- Conducted 1 Parents
TeachersConference for
the school year 2016
2017
b. Visited parents of June 2017 - 5% 5 – Completion of 5 - Attained the 4 4 4 0.2
students needing March 2018 agreement with objective on the
academic intervention is evident target date
4 – Partial agreement with 4 - Attained the
monitoring within
intervention is evident objective 1-2 days
the rating period. 3 – Plan for agreement after the target date
without intervention is 3 - Attained the
evident objective 3-4 days
2 – Only suggested plan after the target date
without execution is 2 - Attained the
evident objective 5-6 days
1 – No agreement and no after the target date
execution are evident 1 - Attained the
objective 7-8 days
after the target date

c. Involved June 2017 - 5% 5- 4 community 5 - Attained the 5 5 5 .25


community in March 2018 involvement activities objective on the
school activities. were accomplished target date
4-3 community 4 - Attained the
involvement activities objective 1-2 days
were accomplished after the target date
3-2 community 3 - Attained the
involvement activities objective 3-4 days
were accomplished after the target date
2-1 community 2 - Attained the
involvement activity objective 5-6 days
were accomplished after the target date
1- Did not involve 1 - Attained the
community in any school objective 7-8 days
activities after the target date
IV.
Professional 20 %
Growth
 Engaged in 5 or
more June 2017 - 5% 5- Engaged in 5 or more 5 - Attained the 5 5 5 0.25
March 2018 instructional supervision, objective on the
instructional
mentoring, coaching to target date
supervision, enrich teaching strategies 4 - Attained the
mentoring, 4- Engaged in 4 objective 1-2 days
coaching to instructional supervision, after the target date
enrich teaching mentoring, coaching to 3 - Attained the
enrich teaching strategies objective 3-4 days
strategies 3- Engaged in 3 after the target date
instructional supervision, 2 - Attained the
mentoring, coaching to objective 5-6 days
enrich teaching strategies after the target date
2- Engaged in 2 1 - Attained the
instructional supervision, objective 7-8 days
mentoring, coaching to after the target date
enrich teaching strategies
1 - Engaged in 1
instructional supervision,
mentoring, coaching to
enrich teaching strategies

5 – Earned 33 units and 5 - Attained the 5 5 5 0.25


 Earned units in
June 2017 - 5% above in graduate studies objective on the
graduate studies March 2018 4 - Earned 25 – 32 units in target date
graduate studies 4 - Attained the
3 - Earned 18 – 24 units in objective 1-2 days
graduate studies after the target date
2 - Earned 11 – 17 units in 3 - Attained the
graduate studies objective 3-4 days
1 - Earned 10 and below after the target date
units in graduate studies 2 - Attained the
objective 5-6 days
after the target date
1 - Attained the
objective 7-8 days
after the target date
5- 4 seminar-workshops
 Attended teacher
were attended 5 - Attained the 5 5 5 0.5
training or June 2017 - 10% 4- 3 seminar-workshops objective on the
seminars INSET, March 2018 were attended target date
SLAC, DLAC to 3- 2 seminar-workshops 4 - Attained the
improve teaching were attended objective 1-2 days
competency. 2- 1 seminar-workshops after the target date
were attended 3 - Attained the
1- did not attend any objective 3-4 days
seminar-workshops after the target date
2 - Attained the
objective 5-6 days
after the target date
1 - Attained the
objective 7-8 days
after the target date

V. Plus 10 %
Factor
 Served as June 2017 - 2%
member of the March 2018
CIP team
 Served as one of
June 2017 - 2%
the coaches in
March 2018
Radio
Broadcasting
during the annual
Cluster Schools
Press Conference

 Served as mentor June 2017 - 2%


to a student March 2018
teacher from
PSAU

 Served as
June 2017 - 2%
Remedial March 2018
Reading Teacher
 Produced 2%
relevant Strategic
Intervention June 2017 -
Materials (SIM) March 2018
for Grade 7

To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned. Overall 50
Rating
for
accompli
shment

Rating Scale: Ratee: Rater: Approved:


Outstanding: 4.500 – 5000
Very Satisfactory: 3.500 – 4.499
Satisfactory: 2.500 – 3.499 REYNIEL LAYSON VERGARA JOSEFINA M. BAYANI JOEL P. CADIANG
Unsatisfactory: 1.500 – 2.499 Teacher I/ ENGLISH 7 Head Teacher III Principal IV
Poor: 1.000 – 1.499