2 views

Uploaded by Jonatan Vignatti Muñoz

Strom Inger 1981

- Freeboard Comparison - D100-96 v. D100-05
- Subset Vertex Graphs for Social Networks
- Data Structures and Algorithms
- Graphical Representation of Data
- Impact Parameter
- Transfer of Moments in Slab-Column Connections
- A Gentle Introduction to Graph Theory - A Preview
- 2011-2012-waterloo-local-contest-2-october-2011-en-converted.pdf
- contoh soal
- NTS ATC questions.doc
- Petri Nets by R. Johnsonbaugh --
- Lab 2.docx
- Transverse Single Spin Asymmetry in p+p↑→D+X
- Network Aware Resource Allocation in Distributed Clouds
- further mathematics mid year holiday homework
- Infinitesimally Locked Self-Touching Linkages by Connelly
- Graph Solutions
- Mike Williams- Measurement of Differential Cross Sections and Spin Density Matrix Elements along with a Partial Wave Analysis for gamma-p-> gamma-p-omega using CLAS at Jefferson Lab
- algoritmiaa
- Bathtub Dynamics

You are on page 1of 4

Andrew STROMINGER 1

Institute for TheoreticalPhysics, Universityof California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA

The validity of the 1/N expansion in field theory is questioned from the point of view of graph counting. A simple an-

satz for the value of each graph in the QCD perturbation series makes it possible to estimate the sum with graph counting

techniques. It is found that the 1IN approximations are more accurate than might have been expected due to the emergence

of a new expansion parameter associated with the graph topology. However, essential non-perturbative features are missed

in any order of the expansion.

The 1IN expansion ,1,2, as used in field theories the 1IN approximation is very good - even when N

with SO(N) or SU(N) symmetries, consists o f group- is not large. This is due to the emergence of a new

ing graphs according to suppression factors o f 1IN. To parameter associated with the graph topology. The

first order, the approximation consists of retaining summed series has nonperturbative behavior that can-

only those graphs with the lowest power of 1IN. For not be seen in the 1IN expansion. It is conjectured

most sufficiently complex theories this is a very small that these features may occur for the QCD perturba-

subset o f the complete set of graphs. I show that the tion series as well.

graphs o f higher orders in 1/Nare so much more numer- We first dicuss the 1/N expansion from the point

ous that, no matter how large N becomes and dispite of view o f graph counting. As an example, consider

their suppression factors, one cannot immediately con- QCD with N colors, an SU(N) gauge group and no

clude that they can be neglected. The validity o f the 1IN quarks, although our considerations apply more gener-

approximation as an expansion in a small parameter is ally to any theory in which the fields are in the rotor

therefore not obvious. It depends on the detailed na- (adjoint) representation. In the notation o f 't Hooft

ture of the series in question. However, one can easily [1 ] the gluon propagators are drawn as two line (see fig.

find mechanisms that retain the validity o f the approxi- 1) that each carry color or anticolor. The fact that the

mation. I construct a numerical series that has some interaction is a color singlet means that color lines do

elementary features in c o m m o n with the perturbation not begin or end at vertices. In order that the 1/N lim-

series for an S U ( N ) gauge theory. In particular, the it may be defined, the coupling constant is chosen to

number o f leading terms in 1/N is small, and the extra

factors of 1/N in higher orders are unable to beat out

9 q ~

the increase in the number o f terms for those orders.

When the series is summed, however, it is found that

Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

:~1 The large N limit of two dimensional QCD is discussed in

ref. [1 ]. g g

,2 The large N limit of the h4~4 vector model is investigated in -/-ff ,/-g ,N ,,N

ref. [2]. For excellent reviews of the large N expansion,

see ref. [3]. Fig. 1. Planar graphs.

45

Volume 99B, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERS 5 February 1981

g g

m=mj ~ ~

o >

o N

Fig. 3. m is the number of orders of the interaction included,

and N is the order of the invariance group. In region I the non-

Fig. 2. A nonplanar graph. planar diagrams outweigh the planar ones, and vice-versa in

region II. The asterisk represents QCD.

be g/x/N. The graphs o f lowest order in 1/N turn out

to be those where no color lines cross (see fig. 1). theory certainly is not) can be rearranged to converge

Since there is a factor of N that comes from summing to an arbitrary value. It is thus not obvious that the

over the internal color loop, these graphs are both 1/N expansion is good even for large finite N * 4.

O(1) in I/N, although they are different order in g. A It is instructive at this point to make a comparison

"non-planar" graph such as fig. 2 is suppressed by a with QED. Since the number of graphs of order a m

factor o f 1/N 2 because it has only one convoluted grows like m m, by these arguments we should turn off

loop. A general graph can be drawn with no propaga- our computers after we have calculated the first 137

tors crossing on a surface of genus (number o f han- orders, at which point the graphs become so numerous

dles) H. The genus of a graph means the minimum as to outweigh the extra factors of a. However, in the

genus o f a surface on which the graph can be drawn 1IN expansion this occurs at the first order and we

with non-intersecting propagators. A graph o f genus should not even plug in the computer.

H is suppressed by a factor o f ( 1 / N 2)H. This is often The 1/N approximations appear to be extremely

used to conclude (or suggest the ansatz) that as N good in some cases, so we expect that this objection

gets large only planar (genus 0) graphs remain. does not apply. A suspicious assumption I have m a d e

It has been shown + 3 that the number of ruth order is that a large number o f order m genus H graphs im-

planar diagrams, for any Green's function, is bounded plies a large term of order H in the 1IN expansion. In

from above by K m. K here is a large constant, and rn fact if we assume that the order H term is obtained by

is the order o f the interaction. This is a very slow summing a non-convergent series, the converse can be

growth rate. When we go from order m to m + 1, the true. In this case a large asymptotic value o f the terms

number o f graphs increases only b y a constant factor, o f this series suggests that the final sum may be small,

regardless of the value of m. I show later that the num- as can be seen for instance in the Borel expansion

ber o f genus 1 graphs of order m goes as m2K m-2. oo

The weighted ratio o f genus 1 to genus 0 graphs is 1 - ~ (-x) n , for large positive x .

1 +x n=0

thus

Since even the leading term for the 1/N expansion

~enusO ~ Km - NK2- -+ O, as m ~ oo.

o f SU(N) gauge theories has not yet been found, de-

genus 1 (m2 /N2)Km-2 m finite statements about its nature are difficult to make.

This situation is depicted in fig. 3. In using the 1IN However, consideration of simpler series can elucidate

approximation to describe QCD, we are extrapolating some features. In the following, such a series is solved

from region I (planar dominance) to region II (non- and discussed.

planar dominance). Additionally Riemann's theorem We construct an example of a simple series that

tells us that by rearrangement of the terms any series retains some features of the SU(N) perturbation series.

that is not absolutely convergent (which perturbation

+3 The problem of graph counting was essentially solved in +4 Similar conclusions concerning the non-trivial nature of the

ref. [4]. It was done for field theories in the rotor represen- planar approximation are reached using functional methods

tation in ref. [5 ] and later very elegantly in ref. [6]. in ref. [7].

46

Volume 99B, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERS 5 February 1981

ANAR APPROXIMATION

A crude but qualitatively correct estimate of the num- r'f', '

ber o f graphs with fixed m and H is derived. We then

assign to each graph a value o f g m N - 2 H , sum the series

and show that the vlanar approximation is the large N

limit.

We first derive an approximate expression for NH,m,

the number o f graphs with m vertices and genus H.

For large rn, and neglecting special symmetries, almost >

0 I 2 3 4 ,5 6 7 H

every genus 1 graph o f order rn + 2 can be uniquely ob-

tained from a planar graph b y the addition o f one prop- Fig. 4. All graphs have values ofm (order of the interaction),

agator and two vertices. Since the number o f propaga- H (genus) above the diagonal. Each column represents one

tors in the genus 0 graph is proportional to the num- term in the 1/N expansion.

ber of vertices it contains, there are about m(rn - 1)/2

m(m - 1) ways of attaching the additional propaga- that the 2 in [(m - 2//)!] - I is crucial; without it there

tor. The constant factors neglected here do not quali- would only be (constant) m graphs o f order m.

tatively affect the final answer. Hence We now weight each graph according to its order m

and genus H. The weighted contribution is * s :

Nm+2,1 = rn(m - 1)Nm, 0 = m ( m - 1)K m . _ 1 m!

WH,m X-2-Hgm(m - 214)! H! K m - z H '

Similarly

summation over m obtaining:

where the ( 2 ! ) - l c o m e s from the fact that each genus 2

m!

graph is produced 2! ways by this construction. Con- WH - 1 ~ gm (m 2H)! K m - z H (3)

N 2 H H ! m =2H

tinuing,

Nm +2H,H = ( m ~ 2) V~-l~. -- ~ H! m! ' m=0

for large m ,

1 - g k H!

so

e - 2g/N(1 - gK),

m! H!Km_2H f o r m ~> 2 H

Nm'H = (m - 2H)! ' '

e is a small expansion parameter (for g = 1, N = 3, e 2

Nm, H = 0 , m <2H. (1) < 0.01). The series in H is asymptotic and is not well

defined for all values o f g and N. To define the sum,

The truncation o f N for 2 H > m (see fig. 4) is due to we look for an integral expression for W --=Z~= 0 WH.

the fact that for a given m, there is an upper limit to We notice

the genus o f the graph. It must be less than the num-

ber o f propagators and H < m / 2 seems reasonable. e-tdt f dte-t(l_at+~_T3(at)2_...)

Our series gives about the right total number o f graphs, f(1 + 2at) 1/2'- 0

0

i.e.

m/2 (2H)!, ',~H

= ~--0 H!-t-~-~ •

Nm,H = O( mm ) ,

H=0 4:5 We could assume a random distribution of signs and say

that WmH grows like Nx/'NmHmH.Again, this would not qua-

which is the case for SU(N) gauge theories. Notice litively affect the final answer.

47

Volume 99B, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERS 5 February 1981

Making the identification - a = ~e 2 , we obtain the def- mation has been observed in many instances. The

inition p-co mass difference is zero in the planar approxima-

tion, and the corrections are naively expected to be of

1 fo dte-t order 1IN 2 = 1/9 [2,3]. Experimentally the mass differ-

W= 1 -gK (1 - e2t) 1/2 (4a) ence is less than 1%. For a more quantitative example,

the large g limit of the ground state energy of the

_ i x~_ e_l/e2 erfc(_i/e) (4b) U(N) invariant matrix anharmonic oscillator has been

e(1 - g K ) calculated by Brezin and Parisi [8]. They find

1-gK e g---~ oo

41_gKe

1 2 e - l/e2

0

? eX2 dx (4c)

× [1 + 0.1179/N 2 + 0.0064/N 4 + O(1/N6)] ,

Expression (a) has a branch point at e = 0. Expression

(c) defines which branch we choose. One sees clearly whereas the exact answer for N = 1 is known numeri-

here how an imaginary term (possibly signalling in- cally to be E(1, g) = 0.6679. The coefficients in eq.

stantons or vacuum instability) can arise in the full (5) show that the 1IN expansion is good even at N = 1.

summation of perturbation series. The series we have summed has similar structure to

We now see why the series in H (the 1/N expansion) the sum of graphs for QCD. It is reasonable to conjec-

is not well defined for real e, even in the Borel sense. ture that a final perturbative solution of QCD will re-

In expanding the QCD functional integral in powers of tain the feature of our model that the real expansion

g to obtain the set of vacuum graphs we may be ex- parameter is not 1/N = 7,1 but 1/K2N 2 ~ 10 -3, and

panding around a branch point. So we do not necessar- that 1/K 2 in QCD wiil be analogous to 1/4rr in QED.

ily expect a well defined series.

Nevertheless, the 1IN expansion still provides a very I would like to tlmnk Sidney Coleman, Roman

good approximation to the integral form for 14/. For e Jackiw, Joe Lykken, Nick Manton, Paolo Rossi, and

small the branch point in the integrand gets pushed off Rhys Scott for numerous and invaluable suggestions

to infinite t and the imaginary part of W goes to zero. and criticisms. This material is based upon work sup-

The e -+ 0 limit of W is exactly (1 - gK) -1, the planar ported by the National Science Foundation under

term. However, we have seen there are essential non- Grant No. PHY-7727084 and US Department of Ener-

perturbative features of W that are missed entirely in gy (DOE) Contract No. EY-76-C-02-3069.

the 1IN expansion.

Further, and somewhat surprisingly we notice the References

emergence of a new expansion parameter, 1/K, or

more precisely [1] G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974) 461.

[2] S. Coleman, R. Jackiw and H.D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. D10

[2g/N(1 - gK) ] 2 ~ (2INK)2. (1974) 2491.

[3] E. Witten, Baryons in thel/Nexpansion, ICTP Trieste

Inspection of eq. (3) reveals that the second order

Summer Workshop (1979);

term is down by a factor of (2gZ/N2)(1 - g K ) -2 rel- S. Coleman, 1/N, SLAC-PUB-2484 (March 1980).

ative to the first. Thus it does not matter i f g is large [4] W.T. Tutte, Can. J. Math. 4 (1962) 21.

and N is not large. For SU(N) gauge theories K is at [5] J. Koplik, A. Neveu and S. Nussinov, Nucl. Phys. B123

least 10 [ 4 - 6 ] . K is determined by the asymptotic (1977) 109.

[6] E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi and J.B. Zuber, Commun.

behavior of the number of planar graphs, and is a

Math. Phys. 59 (19278) 35.

topological characteristic of the graph theory. [7] C. Itzykson and J.B. Zuber, J. Math. Phys. 21 (1980) 411.

Indeed, unexpected accuracy of the 1IN approxi- [8] E. Brezin, private communication.

48

- Freeboard Comparison - D100-96 v. D100-05Uploaded byinnovum
- Subset Vertex Graphs for Social NetworksUploaded byAnonymous 0U9j6BLllB
- Data Structures and AlgorithmsUploaded byjnkumar
- Graphical Representation of DataUploaded byJena Paredes Ferolino
- Impact ParameterUploaded bymhmalki
- Transfer of Moments in Slab-Column ConnectionsUploaded bySherwin Sr Macaraeg Sarmiento
- A Gentle Introduction to Graph Theory - A PreviewUploaded byjoy_k_joseph
- 2011-2012-waterloo-local-contest-2-october-2011-en-converted.pdfUploaded byAnonymous dGVRcI3
- contoh soalUploaded byAndinata Sitepu
- NTS ATC questions.docUploaded bywaqar
- Petri Nets by R. Johnsonbaugh --Uploaded byFlorencio Paucar
- Lab 2.docxUploaded byAkcent Adrian
- Transverse Single Spin Asymmetry in p+p↑→D+XUploaded byAbhiram Kaushik
- Network Aware Resource Allocation in Distributed CloudsUploaded bycongthinh
- further mathematics mid year holiday homeworkUploaded byapi-254501788
- Infinitesimally Locked Self-Touching Linkages by ConnellyUploaded byTensegrity Wiki
- Graph SolutionsUploaded bySanjoy Pandit
- Mike Williams- Measurement of Differential Cross Sections and Spin Density Matrix Elements along with a Partial Wave Analysis for gamma-p-> gamma-p-omega using CLAS at Jefferson LabUploaded byYamcsa
- algoritmiaaUploaded byYolitaBerenizeD.Gonzales
- Bathtub DynamicsUploaded byspithridates
- COT5405 Assignment 3Uploaded byKarthikBalasubramanian
- Sdt SlidesUploaded byyachsin27
- 93865656575326-Pad-Footing-BS8110Uploaded byAsif Billal
- Sam DominicUploaded bySam antonio
- grafo coloreadoUploaded byFelix Escobar
- REsistancesUploaded bySidharth Soundararajan
- Unit - III GT(Updated)Uploaded byDipu
- MechanicsHandoutR08_2013_part01Uploaded byWilly Chandra
- Art and Geometry.pdfUploaded byIon C. Andronache
- 0029Uploaded byGicu

- Weinberg 2003Finally, learn something about the history of science,or at a minimum the history of your own branch of science. The least important reason for this is that the history may actually be of some use to you in your own scientific work. For instance, now and then scientists are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified models of science that have been proposed by philosophers from Francis Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. The best antidote to the philosophy ofUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Pruna PaperUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- variationalUploaded byNguyễn Châu Phương Thi
- Boyar Sky 2018Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- [Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz (Auth.)] Theory Special relativity and quantum mechanics, formulated early in the twentieth century, are the two most important scientific languages and are likely to remain so for many years to come. In the 1920's, when quantum mechanics was developed, the most pressing theoretical problem was how to make it consistent with special relativity. In the 1980's, this is still the most pressing problem. The only difference is that the situation is more urgent now than before, because of the significant quantity of experimental data which need to be explained in terms of both quantum mechanics and special relativity. In unifying the concepts and algorithms of quantum mechanics and special relativity, it is important to realize that the underlying scientific language for both disciplines is that of group theory. The role of group theory in quantum mechanics is well known. The same is true for special relativity. Therefore, the most effective approach to the problemUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- PhysicsUploaded byojflores1
- VDDMMUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- The-Language-of-Physics-The-Calculus-and-the-Development-of-Theoretical-Physics-in-Europe-1750-1914.pdfUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- PNL Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP)Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) – developed in the 1970’s by Richard Bandler and John Grinder – is an approach that aims to enhance the effectiveness of communication and facilitate learning and personal development. It is becoming increasingly familiar in formal education, professional development, and informal learning. A recent book called `NLP for Teachers’ (Churches & Terry 2007) has received a very favourable review from the distinguished Canadian scholar, Michael Fullan. NLP is also a popular approach to coaching (e.g. Henwood & Lister 2007) and is also a recognised mode of psychotherapy in the UK [i]. – developed in the 1970’s by Richard Bandler and John Grinder – is an approach that aims to enhance the effectiveness of communication and facilitate learning and personal development. It is becoming increasingly familiar in formal education, professional development, and informal learning. A recent book called `NLP for Teachers’ (ChurchesUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- IrreversibilityUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- sohnius_article.pdfUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Standard Model an IntroductionUploaded byJorgeGrajalesRivera
- Introduction Weak Interaction Volume TwoSchrödinger nació en Erdberg, una localidad cercana a Viena, en 1887. Era hijo de Rudolf Schrödinger y Georgine Emilia Brenda. En 1898 entró en el Akademisches Gymnasium, una de las instituciones de enseñanza media más prestigiosas del ámbito germánico. Entre los años 1906 y 1910, Schrödinger estudió en Viena recibiendo clases de Franz Serafin Exner y de Friedrich Hasenöhrl. También realizó trabajos experimentales en colaboración con Friedrich Kohlrausch. En 1911, Schrödinger se convirtió en asistente de Exner.Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- (4) moreno1989The Dirac oscillator is an exactly soluble model recently introduced in the context of many particle models in relativistic quantum mechanics. The model has been also considered as an interaction term for modelling quark confinement in quantum chromodynamics. These considerations should be enough for demonstrating that the Dirac oscillator can be an excellent example in relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we offer a solution to the problem and discuss some of its properties. We also discuss a physical picture for the Dirac oscillator's non-standard interaction, showing how it arises on describing the behaviour of a neutral particle carrying an anomalous magnetic moment and moving inside an uniformly charged sphere.Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- PhysRevLett.55.1039Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- FeynmanUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Physics PacBefore you start 1.1 The purpose of this package The goal of this package is to make typesetting equations for physics simpler, faster, and more humanreadable. To that end, the commands included in this package have names that make the purpose of each command immediately obvious and remove any ambiguity while reading and editing physics code. From a practical standpoint, it is handy to have a well-defined set of shortcuts for accessing the long-form of each of these commands. The commands listed below are therefore defined in terms of their long-form names and then shown explicitly in terms of the default shorthand command sequences. These shorthand commands are meant make it easy to remember both the shorthand names and what each one represents. 1.2 Other required packages The physics package requires xparse and amsmath to work properly in your L ATEX document. The amsmath package comes standard with most L ATEX distributions and is loaded by physics for your convenience. YUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- PhysRevD.70.031901Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- 5925-25008-2-PBUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- SUSY.pdfUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- FeynCalcUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Neutrino LoopsUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Advanced Quantum Field TheoryUploaded byVaibhav Kumar Jain
- Complex NumbersUploaded byhyd arnes
- Chapter 6 QurelfldUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- K-GLa ecuación fue llamada así en honor a los físicos Oskar Klein y Walter Gordon, quienes en 1926 propusieron que ella describe a los electrones relativistas. Otros autores haciendo similares afirmaciones en ese mismo año fueron Vladimir Fock, Johann Kudar, Théophile de Donder y Frans-H. van den Dungen, y Louis de Broglie. A pesar de que la ecuación de Dirac describe al electrón en rotación (spinning), la ecuación de Klein-Gordon describe correctamente a los piones sin espín. Los piones son partículas compuestas; una de ellas es el bosón de Higgs, un bosón de espín cero, de acuerdo con el Modelo Estándar.Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Relativisticquanm Mechanics of a DiracUploaded byyacinephysique

- Sullivan,KK 2017Uploaded byMihaiIliescu
- Analysis VowelUploaded byMayora Ulfa
- Azure vs AWSUploaded byDivyaanshu Singh
- A 2-EEL306Uploaded bySiddhartha Das
- Operations Management 2010 April (2006 Ad)Uploaded byV
- Prem KanthUploaded byazzam_ali
- Kripps Newsletter 5Uploaded bysuckerx
- A New Breakup Regime of Liquid Drops Identified in a Continuous and Uniform Air Jet Flow 2007Uploaded by李海鹰
- Computer AssignmentUploaded bySudheender Srinivasan
- h55mxv_enUploaded byWirhanuddin Iskandar
- Ati Rn Rmjkhg Errata AmsUploaded byBooger
- Magnesium Versus Sulphur in Ductile IronUploaded byarnaldorcr8646
- Accounting Fraud Auditing and the Role of Government Sanctions in China 2015 Journal of Business ResearchUploaded byAquamarine Emerald
- Coleman - Beyond Inclusive Legal PostivismUploaded byAxel Sol
- Industry Life CycleUploaded bysmileh90827
- t InspireUploaded byMiguel Santos
- Ensemble Application of Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks for Multi-label Text CategorizationUploaded byjeffconnors
- Plug-In Baces3D for Rhino3 InstallationUploaded byCaffe Bar Harlequin
- linuxwksp-outline day2Uploaded byanon-990812
- JAMA-2007-Schneider-1429-38Uploaded byMustafá Apellidos
- Pharmacology I QB تمريض 100Uploaded byms_hs3wiyah
- Bicarbonate Therapy in Severe Metabolic AcidosisUploaded byEK
- Soil Microorganism – ActinomycetesUploaded byShailendra Yadav
- 130562424 Bhairava Stotra Shiva Stuti of Sri AbhinavaguptaUploaded byBanibrata Bhattacharya
- Dorsal Midbrain Syndrome.pdfUploaded byanggastavasthi
- The Decameron_1.docxUploaded byJoy Amante Belina
- medical-lavana.docxUploaded byAbhilashPadmanabhan
- ir2153-2.pdfUploaded byamijoski6051
- Underworld Lore Issue 02.pdfUploaded byFoxtrot Oscar
- 125760133 Buckling of Thin Metal Shells 296Uploaded bypawkom