Strom Inger 1981

© All Rights Reserved

2 views

Strom Inger 1981

© All Rights Reserved

- 125-03
- pre-observation form sample
- Isospin breaking quark condensates in Chiral Perturbation Theory
- nolan
- Terminal Velocity Data
- CH#1,2,3,4 Www.booknStuff.com
- Graph Theory Red Soln
- nordin eric 1
- ruishu term iii science rewrite-2 nlrb-2
- Latex Report
- Minimum Cycle Base of Graphs Identified by Two Planar Graphs
- Anomalous Hall Effect
- 10.1.1.73.5875
- Comparison between Vertex Merge Algorithm and Dsatur Algorithm
- Secure Graph.pdf
- Resolvent.energy Estrada.conjecture
- CSE
- r014d
- Flood frequency analyses
- Holiday Math Activity Plotting Points and Finding Slope

You are on page 1of 4

Andrew STROMINGER 1

Institute for TheoreticalPhysics, Universityof California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA

The validity of the 1/N expansion in field theory is questioned from the point of view of graph counting. A simple an-

satz for the value of each graph in the QCD perturbation series makes it possible to estimate the sum with graph counting

techniques. It is found that the 1IN approximations are more accurate than might have been expected due to the emergence

of a new expansion parameter associated with the graph topology. However, essential non-perturbative features are missed

in any order of the expansion.

The 1IN expansion ,1,2, as used in field theories the 1IN approximation is very good - even when N

with SO(N) or SU(N) symmetries, consists o f group- is not large. This is due to the emergence of a new

ing graphs according to suppression factors o f 1IN. To parameter associated with the graph topology. The

first order, the approximation consists of retaining summed series has nonperturbative behavior that can-

only those graphs with the lowest power of 1IN. For not be seen in the 1IN expansion. It is conjectured

most sufficiently complex theories this is a very small that these features may occur for the QCD perturba-

subset o f the complete set of graphs. I show that the tion series as well.

graphs o f higher orders in 1/Nare so much more numer- We first dicuss the 1/N expansion from the point

ous that, no matter how large N becomes and dispite of view o f graph counting. As an example, consider

their suppression factors, one cannot immediately con- QCD with N colors, an SU(N) gauge group and no

clude that they can be neglected. The validity o f the 1IN quarks, although our considerations apply more gener-

approximation as an expansion in a small parameter is ally to any theory in which the fields are in the rotor

therefore not obvious. It depends on the detailed na- (adjoint) representation. In the notation o f 't Hooft

ture of the series in question. However, one can easily [1 ] the gluon propagators are drawn as two line (see fig.

find mechanisms that retain the validity o f the approxi- 1) that each carry color or anticolor. The fact that the

mation. I construct a numerical series that has some interaction is a color singlet means that color lines do

elementary features in c o m m o n with the perturbation not begin or end at vertices. In order that the 1/N lim-

series for an S U ( N ) gauge theory. In particular, the it may be defined, the coupling constant is chosen to

number o f leading terms in 1/N is small, and the extra

factors of 1/N in higher orders are unable to beat out

9 q ~

the increase in the number o f terms for those orders.

When the series is summed, however, it is found that

Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

:~1 The large N limit of two dimensional QCD is discussed in

ref. [1 ]. g g

,2 The large N limit of the h4~4 vector model is investigated in -/-ff ,/-g ,N ,,N

ref. [2]. For excellent reviews of the large N expansion,

see ref. [3]. Fig. 1. Planar graphs.

45

Volume 99B, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERS 5 February 1981

g g

m=mj ~ ~

o >

o N

Fig. 3. m is the number of orders of the interaction included,

and N is the order of the invariance group. In region I the non-

Fig. 2. A nonplanar graph. planar diagrams outweigh the planar ones, and vice-versa in

region II. The asterisk represents QCD.

be g/x/N. The graphs o f lowest order in 1/N turn out

to be those where no color lines cross (see fig. 1). theory certainly is not) can be rearranged to converge

Since there is a factor of N that comes from summing to an arbitrary value. It is thus not obvious that the

over the internal color loop, these graphs are both 1/N expansion is good even for large finite N * 4.

O(1) in I/N, although they are different order in g. A It is instructive at this point to make a comparison

"non-planar" graph such as fig. 2 is suppressed by a with QED. Since the number of graphs of order a m

factor o f 1/N 2 because it has only one convoluted grows like m m, by these arguments we should turn off

loop. A general graph can be drawn with no propaga- our computers after we have calculated the first 137

tors crossing on a surface of genus (number o f han- orders, at which point the graphs become so numerous

dles) H. The genus of a graph means the minimum as to outweigh the extra factors of a. However, in the

genus o f a surface on which the graph can be drawn 1IN expansion this occurs at the first order and we

with non-intersecting propagators. A graph o f genus should not even plug in the computer.

H is suppressed by a factor o f ( 1 / N 2)H. This is often The 1/N approximations appear to be extremely

used to conclude (or suggest the ansatz) that as N good in some cases, so we expect that this objection

gets large only planar (genus 0) graphs remain. does not apply. A suspicious assumption I have m a d e

It has been shown + 3 that the number of ruth order is that a large number o f order m genus H graphs im-

planar diagrams, for any Green's function, is bounded plies a large term of order H in the 1IN expansion. In

from above by K m. K here is a large constant, and rn fact if we assume that the order H term is obtained by

is the order o f the interaction. This is a very slow summing a non-convergent series, the converse can be

growth rate. When we go from order m to m + 1, the true. In this case a large asymptotic value o f the terms

number o f graphs increases only b y a constant factor, o f this series suggests that the final sum may be small,

regardless of the value of m. I show later that the num- as can be seen for instance in the Borel expansion

ber o f genus 1 graphs of order m goes as m2K m-2. oo

The weighted ratio o f genus 1 to genus 0 graphs is 1 - ~ (-x) n , for large positive x .

1 +x n=0

thus

Since even the leading term for the 1/N expansion

~enusO ~ Km - NK2- -+ O, as m ~ oo.

o f SU(N) gauge theories has not yet been found, de-

genus 1 (m2 /N2)Km-2 m finite statements about its nature are difficult to make.

This situation is depicted in fig. 3. In using the 1IN However, consideration of simpler series can elucidate

approximation to describe QCD, we are extrapolating some features. In the following, such a series is solved

from region I (planar dominance) to region II (non- and discussed.

planar dominance). Additionally Riemann's theorem We construct an example of a simple series that

tells us that by rearrangement of the terms any series retains some features of the SU(N) perturbation series.

that is not absolutely convergent (which perturbation

+3 The problem of graph counting was essentially solved in +4 Similar conclusions concerning the non-trivial nature of the

ref. [4]. It was done for field theories in the rotor represen- planar approximation are reached using functional methods

tation in ref. [5 ] and later very elegantly in ref. [6]. in ref. [7].

46

Volume 99B, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERS 5 February 1981

ANAR APPROXIMATION

A crude but qualitatively correct estimate of the num- r'f', '

ber o f graphs with fixed m and H is derived. We then

assign to each graph a value o f g m N - 2 H , sum the series

and show that the vlanar approximation is the large N

limit.

We first derive an approximate expression for NH,m,

the number o f graphs with m vertices and genus H.

For large rn, and neglecting special symmetries, almost >

0 I 2 3 4 ,5 6 7 H

every genus 1 graph o f order rn + 2 can be uniquely ob-

tained from a planar graph b y the addition o f one prop- Fig. 4. All graphs have values ofm (order of the interaction),

agator and two vertices. Since the number o f propaga- H (genus) above the diagonal. Each column represents one

tors in the genus 0 graph is proportional to the num- term in the 1/N expansion.

ber of vertices it contains, there are about m(rn - 1)/2

m(m - 1) ways of attaching the additional propaga- that the 2 in [(m - 2//)!] - I is crucial; without it there

tor. The constant factors neglected here do not quali- would only be (constant) m graphs o f order m.

tatively affect the final answer. Hence We now weight each graph according to its order m

and genus H. The weighted contribution is * s :

Nm+2,1 = rn(m - 1)Nm, 0 = m ( m - 1)K m . _ 1 m!

WH,m X-2-Hgm(m - 214)! H! K m - z H '

Similarly

summation over m obtaining:

where the ( 2 ! ) - l c o m e s from the fact that each genus 2

m!

graph is produced 2! ways by this construction. Con- WH - 1 ~ gm (m 2H)! K m - z H (3)

N 2 H H ! m =2H

tinuing,

Nm +2H,H = ( m ~ 2) V~-l~. -- ~ H! m! ' m=0

for large m ,

1 - g k H!

so

e - 2g/N(1 - gK),

m! H!Km_2H f o r m ~> 2 H

Nm'H = (m - 2H)! ' '

e is a small expansion parameter (for g = 1, N = 3, e 2

Nm, H = 0 , m <2H. (1) < 0.01). The series in H is asymptotic and is not well

defined for all values o f g and N. To define the sum,

The truncation o f N for 2 H > m (see fig. 4) is due to we look for an integral expression for W --=Z~= 0 WH.

the fact that for a given m, there is an upper limit to We notice

the genus o f the graph. It must be less than the num-

ber o f propagators and H < m / 2 seems reasonable. e-tdt f dte-t(l_at+~_T3(at)2_...)

Our series gives about the right total number o f graphs, f(1 + 2at) 1/2'- 0

0

i.e.

m/2 (2H)!, ',~H

= ~--0 H!-t-~-~ •

Nm,H = O( mm ) ,

H=0 4:5 We could assume a random distribution of signs and say

that WmH grows like Nx/'NmHmH.Again, this would not qua-

which is the case for SU(N) gauge theories. Notice litively affect the final answer.

47

Volume 99B, number 1 PHYSICS LETTERS 5 February 1981

Making the identification - a = ~e 2 , we obtain the def- mation has been observed in many instances. The

inition p-co mass difference is zero in the planar approxima-

tion, and the corrections are naively expected to be of

1 fo dte-t order 1IN 2 = 1/9 [2,3]. Experimentally the mass differ-

W= 1 -gK (1 - e2t) 1/2 (4a) ence is less than 1%. For a more quantitative example,

the large g limit of the ground state energy of the

_ i x~_ e_l/e2 erfc(_i/e) (4b) U(N) invariant matrix anharmonic oscillator has been

e(1 - g K ) calculated by Brezin and Parisi [8]. They find

1-gK e g---~ oo

41_gKe

1 2 e - l/e2

0

? eX2 dx (4c)

× [1 + 0.1179/N 2 + 0.0064/N 4 + O(1/N6)] ,

Expression (a) has a branch point at e = 0. Expression

(c) defines which branch we choose. One sees clearly whereas the exact answer for N = 1 is known numeri-

here how an imaginary term (possibly signalling in- cally to be E(1, g) = 0.6679. The coefficients in eq.

stantons or vacuum instability) can arise in the full (5) show that the 1IN expansion is good even at N = 1.

summation of perturbation series. The series we have summed has similar structure to

We now see why the series in H (the 1/N expansion) the sum of graphs for QCD. It is reasonable to conjec-

is not well defined for real e, even in the Borel sense. ture that a final perturbative solution of QCD will re-

In expanding the QCD functional integral in powers of tain the feature of our model that the real expansion

g to obtain the set of vacuum graphs we may be ex- parameter is not 1/N = 7,1 but 1/K2N 2 ~ 10 -3, and

panding around a branch point. So we do not necessar- that 1/K 2 in QCD wiil be analogous to 1/4rr in QED.

ily expect a well defined series.

Nevertheless, the 1IN expansion still provides a very I would like to tlmnk Sidney Coleman, Roman

good approximation to the integral form for 14/. For e Jackiw, Joe Lykken, Nick Manton, Paolo Rossi, and

small the branch point in the integrand gets pushed off Rhys Scott for numerous and invaluable suggestions

to infinite t and the imaginary part of W goes to zero. and criticisms. This material is based upon work sup-

The e -+ 0 limit of W is exactly (1 - gK) -1, the planar ported by the National Science Foundation under

term. However, we have seen there are essential non- Grant No. PHY-7727084 and US Department of Ener-

perturbative features of W that are missed entirely in gy (DOE) Contract No. EY-76-C-02-3069.

the 1IN expansion.

Further, and somewhat surprisingly we notice the References

emergence of a new expansion parameter, 1/K, or

more precisely [1] G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974) 461.

[2] S. Coleman, R. Jackiw and H.D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. D10

[2g/N(1 - gK) ] 2 ~ (2INK)2. (1974) 2491.

[3] E. Witten, Baryons in thel/Nexpansion, ICTP Trieste

Inspection of eq. (3) reveals that the second order

Summer Workshop (1979);

term is down by a factor of (2gZ/N2)(1 - g K ) -2 rel- S. Coleman, 1/N, SLAC-PUB-2484 (March 1980).

ative to the first. Thus it does not matter i f g is large [4] W.T. Tutte, Can. J. Math. 4 (1962) 21.

and N is not large. For SU(N) gauge theories K is at [5] J. Koplik, A. Neveu and S. Nussinov, Nucl. Phys. B123

least 10 [ 4 - 6 ] . K is determined by the asymptotic (1977) 109.

[6] E. Brezin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi and J.B. Zuber, Commun.

behavior of the number of planar graphs, and is a

Math. Phys. 59 (19278) 35.

topological characteristic of the graph theory. [7] C. Itzykson and J.B. Zuber, J. Math. Phys. 21 (1980) 411.

Indeed, unexpected accuracy of the 1IN approxi- [8] E. Brezin, private communication.

48

- 125-03Uploaded byTengku Alif Tengku Mizam
- pre-observation form sampleUploaded byapi-274909201
- Isospin breaking quark condensates in Chiral Perturbation TheoryUploaded byRicardo Torres-Lagarde Andrés
- nolanUploaded byMarcelo Perticone
- Terminal Velocity DataUploaded byShruti Tayal
- CH#1,2,3,4 Www.booknStuff.comUploaded bypramodagarwal_nitrkl
- Graph Theory Red SolnUploaded byOscar Velez
- nordin eric 1Uploaded byapi-241700586
- ruishu term iii science rewrite-2 nlrb-2Uploaded byapi-242285135
- Latex ReportUploaded bybolaji00
- Minimum Cycle Base of Graphs Identified by Two Planar GraphsUploaded byMia Amalia
- Anomalous Hall EffectUploaded byImtiazAhmed
- 10.1.1.73.5875Uploaded byChrisLai
- Comparison between Vertex Merge Algorithm and Dsatur AlgorithmUploaded byBicyy
- Secure Graph.pdfUploaded byTusharKumar
- Resolvent.energy Estrada.conjectureUploaded bydragance106
- CSEUploaded byTebsu Tebsuko
- r014dUploaded byAnonymous rFIshYy
- Flood frequency analysesUploaded byPrasit Agnihotri
- Holiday Math Activity Plotting Points and Finding SlopeUploaded byVioleta Vázquez
- 5 GATE CS 2000 GeeksforGeeksUploaded byjoshna1234
- 3rd Sem End Term 2014Uploaded byAsif Ahmed
- data collection and bar graphsUploaded byapi-331862751
- New Microsoft Word DocumentUploaded byBilal Anwar
- borgatti - Betweenness centrality measures for directed graphs.pdfUploaded byaotaegui29
- ROB-2018_Test2Uploaded byAll_reg
- Coloring hypercomplete and hyperpath graphs.pdfUploaded byRavi Teja Dasam
- 1294Uploaded byJavier de la Cruz
- elebda3.net-3050.pdfUploaded byFoudil RAIS
- Nuclear EmulsionUploaded byMohd Hasan

- Introduction Weak Interaction Volume TwoSchrödinger nació en Erdberg, una localidad cercana a Viena, en 1887. Era hijo de Rudolf Schrödinger y Georgine Emilia Brenda. En 1898 entró en el Akademisches Gymnasium, una de las instituciones de enseñanza media más prestigiosas del ámbito germánico. Entre los años 1906 y 1910, Schrödinger estudió en Viena recibiendo clases de Franz Serafin Exner y de Friedrich Hasenöhrl. También realizó trabajos experimentales en colaboración con Friedrich Kohlrausch. En 1911, Schrödinger se convirtió en asistente de Exner.Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Pruna PaperUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- variationalUploaded byNguyễn Châu Phương Thi
- Boyar Sky 2018Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Weinberg 2003Finally, learn something about the history of science,or at a minimum the history of your own branch of science. The least important reason for this is that the history may actually be of some use to you in your own scientific work. For instance, now and then scientists are hampered by believing one of the oversimplified models of science that have been proposed by philosophers from Francis Bacon to Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. The best antidote to the philosophy ofUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- [Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz (Auth.)] Theory Special relativity and quantum mechanics, formulated early in the twentieth century, are the two most important scientific languages and are likely to remain so for many years to come. In the 1920's, when quantum mechanics was developed, the most pressing theoretical problem was how to make it consistent with special relativity. In the 1980's, this is still the most pressing problem. The only difference is that the situation is more urgent now than before, because of the significant quantity of experimental data which need to be explained in terms of both quantum mechanics and special relativity. In unifying the concepts and algorithms of quantum mechanics and special relativity, it is important to realize that the underlying scientific language for both disciplines is that of group theory. The role of group theory in quantum mechanics is well known. The same is true for special relativity. Therefore, the most effective approach to the problemUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- VDDMMUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- The-Language-of-Physics-The-Calculus-and-the-Development-of-Theoretical-Physics-in-Europe-1750-1914.pdfUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- PhysicsUploaded byojflores1
- PNL Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP)Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) – developed in the 1970’s by Richard Bandler and John Grinder – is an approach that aims to enhance the effectiveness of communication and facilitate learning and personal development. It is becoming increasingly familiar in formal education, professional development, and informal learning. A recent book called `NLP for Teachers’ (Churches & Terry 2007) has received a very favourable review from the distinguished Canadian scholar, Michael Fullan. NLP is also a popular approach to coaching (e.g. Henwood & Lister 2007) and is also a recognised mode of psychotherapy in the UK [i]. – developed in the 1970’s by Richard Bandler and John Grinder – is an approach that aims to enhance the effectiveness of communication and facilitate learning and personal development. It is becoming increasingly familiar in formal education, professional development, and informal learning. A recent book called `NLP for Teachers’ (ChurchesUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- sohnius_article.pdfUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- IrreversibilityUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Physics PacBefore you start 1.1 The purpose of this package The goal of this package is to make typesetting equations for physics simpler, faster, and more humanreadable. To that end, the commands included in this package have names that make the purpose of each command immediately obvious and remove any ambiguity while reading and editing physics code. From a practical standpoint, it is handy to have a well-defined set of shortcuts for accessing the long-form of each of these commands. The commands listed below are therefore defined in terms of their long-form names and then shown explicitly in terms of the default shorthand command sequences. These shorthand commands are meant make it easy to remember both the shorthand names and what each one represents. 1.2 Other required packages The physics package requires xparse and amsmath to work properly in your L ATEX document. The amsmath package comes standard with most L ATEX distributions and is loaded by physics for your convenience. YUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- (4) moreno1989The Dirac oscillator is an exactly soluble model recently introduced in the context of many particle models in relativistic quantum mechanics. The model has been also considered as an interaction term for modelling quark confinement in quantum chromodynamics. These considerations should be enough for demonstrating that the Dirac oscillator can be an excellent example in relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we offer a solution to the problem and discuss some of its properties. We also discuss a physical picture for the Dirac oscillator's non-standard interaction, showing how it arises on describing the behaviour of a neutral particle carrying an anomalous magnetic moment and moving inside an uniformly charged sphere.Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Standard Model an IntroductionUploaded byJorgeGrajalesRivera
- PhysRevLett.55.1039Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- FeynmanUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- PhysRevD.70.031901Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- 5925-25008-2-PBUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- SUSY.pdfUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- FeynCalcUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Neutrino LoopsUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Advanced Quantum Field TheoryUploaded byVaibhav Kumar Jain
- Complex NumbersUploaded byhyd arnes
- Chapter 6 QurelfldUploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- K-GLa ecuación fue llamada así en honor a los físicos Oskar Klein y Walter Gordon, quienes en 1926 propusieron que ella describe a los electrones relativistas. Otros autores haciendo similares afirmaciones en ese mismo año fueron Vladimir Fock, Johann Kudar, Théophile de Donder y Frans-H. van den Dungen, y Louis de Broglie. A pesar de que la ecuación de Dirac describe al electrón en rotación (spinning), la ecuación de Klein-Gordon describe correctamente a los piones sin espín. Los piones son partículas compuestas; una de ellas es el bosón de Higgs, un bosón de espín cero, de acuerdo con el Modelo Estándar.Uploaded byJonatan Vignatti Muñoz
- Relativisticquanm Mechanics of a DiracUploaded byyacinephysique

- 1. Atomic StructureUploaded byAntonique Headman
- Atomic StructureUploaded byawebsite
- Bohr.docxUploaded byMuhammad Awais Sultani
- Nmr SpectroscopyUploaded byAshish Verma
- On the Lanthanide and Scandinide ContractionsUploaded byEnrick von Ubik
- Electronic Structure of Heavy Fermion Uranium Compounds Studied by Core-Level Photoelectron SpectroscopyUploaded byrc85948
- Bohr Diagram LessonUploaded byibrahim_s
- 09 - Quantum MechanicsUploaded byray_ozma
- Electronic Structure MethodsUploaded byAnonymous jByA78
- Lecture NotesUploaded byToni Guatato
- On the Theory of Metals - H. BetheUploaded byFernando Vidal Olmos
- The Beginnings of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Particle PhysicsUploaded byJose Francisco Suriano Chacon
- Sturm-Liouville Eigenvalue ProblemsUploaded byPrasad Uday Bandodkar
- Dc Josephson EffectUploaded byravi
- G. G. Batrouni and R. T. Scalettar- Phase separation in supersolidsUploaded byKuiasm
- Zero Field SplittingUploaded byHenrique Castro
- Metallic Oxides by GoodenoughUploaded bymuk_hawk
- Damian Markham- Entanglement Symmetry of Permutation Symmetric StatesUploaded byPomac232
- string string.pdfUploaded byKlm Flm
- Problems Foundations of Quantum PhysicsUploaded byPirvulescu Ramona
- Harris, J. (1985). "Simplified method for calculating the energy of weakly interacting fragments"Uploaded bysandiip89
- Renormalization Group and Phase Transitions in Spin GaugeUploaded bydheerajkmishra
- Atomic Review Packet[1]Uploaded byrjardon
- Homework1 Answer Key Quantum ChemistryUploaded byLuther James Langston II
- AuffreyCooley PhysRev.124.137Uploaded byLisa Knight
- Lagrangian Quantum MechanicsUploaded byjosclem
- From Quantum Matter 1st PageUploaded byphysicsdood
- statmechUploaded byPaul Allen Chavit
- Solvay Conference and Quantum Physics.pdfUploaded byAykut Kutucu
- RevModPhys.77.1321_Imprimir___Uploaded byAlessandro Alves

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.