2 views

Uploaded by bauemmvss

Elastic and inelastic local buckling of stiffened plates subjected to
non-uniform compression using the Galerkin method

- Rudman Investigtation 2009
- Recent Developments in Finite Element Analysis
- Comparison of Ansi Aisc 360-05 to 1989 Asd Specification
- DNV - RP-C201 Buckling Strength of Plated Structures
- 646_Optimised Aluminium Vehicle Front Section - Public Version
- Copy of SAP2000 Verification 1400
- Working with single-angle members
- Nasa Beam+Column Stability
- Design of Concrete ShearWall
- Background to Eurocodes
- Cornell Report
- SSRC 2010 P1003
- SSP Design Guidelines
- 342
- Steel_Ch5 Beam Column 1
- Buckling strength of hydraulic cylinders
- Handbook Engineering Section12 Transportation Ch83
- Buckling of Struts
- stability
- Me 356 Car Frame Design Write Up

You are on page 1of 12

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apm

non-uniform compression using the Galerkin method

E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari *

Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-8311, Iran

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: A solution for the elastic and inelastic local buckling of ﬂat rectangular plates with center-

Received 2 February 2008 line boundary conditions subjected to non-uniform in-plane compression and shear stress

Received in revised form 15 March 2008 is presented. The loaded edges are simply supported, the longitudinal edges may have any

Accepted 25 March 2008

boundary conditions and the centerline is simply supported with a variable rotational stiff-

Available online 11 April 2008

ness. The Galerkin method, an effective method for solving differential equations, is applied

to establish an eigenvalue problem. In order to obtain plate buckling coefﬁcients, combined

trigonometric and polynomial functions that satisfy the boundary conditions are used. The

Keywords:

Local buckling

method is programmed, and several numerical examples including elastic and inelastic

Inelastic buckling local buckling, are presented to illustrate the scope and efﬁcacy of the procedure. The var-

Galerkin method iation of buckling coefﬁcients with aspect ratio is presented for various stress gradient

Centerline stiffener ratios. The solution is applicable to stiffened plates and the ﬂange of the I-shaped beams

Rectangular plates that are subjected to biaxial bending or combined ﬂexure and torsion and shear stresses,

and is important to estimate the reduction in elastic buckling capacity due to stress

gradient.

Ó 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Thin steel plates are widely used as the main structural components of box girders in bridges, plate girders, platforms of

offshore structures, shipbuilding and aircraft industries. In order to lighten the structural systems and come up with an econ-

omy design, plates are often designed with stiffeners. Although a considerable amount of information on the buckling capac-

ity of plates subjected to non-uniform stress is available, however, most solutions primarily involves plates with edge

boundary conditions and do not explicitly consider plates with mid support. The buckling capacity of stiffened plates, such

as the ﬂanges of I-shaped beams, is easily evaluated by separating one side of the plate and assuming ideal (fully restrained

or simply supported) edge conditions when the applied stress is uniform. Solutions for uniform stress cases are widely avail-

able for a variety of edge conditions.

Some other researchers have investigated the buckling behavior of plates subjected to non-uniform compression. Inves-

tigations involving simply supported boundaries on loaded edges and subjected to various boundary conditions on their un-

loaded edges are common. Timoshenko and Gere [1] calculated the elastic buckling load of simply supported plates

subjected to in-plane bending by energy methods. Johnson and Noel [2] also used energy methods for plates subjected to

in-plane bending with the tension side simply supported and compression side elastically restrained. Design charts devel-

oped for evaluating the critical stresses included aspect ratio and stress ratio. Walker [3,4] investigated the local instability

of ﬂanges and webs of initially perfect channel sections under eccentric loading along the axis of symmetry. Using the

E-mail address: Mojtaba@cc.iut.ac.ir (M. Azhari).

S0307-904X/$ - see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/j.apm.2008.03.020

E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885 1875

Nomenclature

a length of plate

b width of plate

D ﬂexural rigidity of the plate

E Young’s modulus of the plate material

Es secant modulus

Et tangent modulus

J the number of terms required for convergence

kcr critical buckling coefﬁcient

[L] stiffness matrix of plate

[M] stability matrix of plate

{M} vector of inﬁnitesimal buckling moments

N0 value of Nx at centerline of plate

m, n integers in the deﬂection series coefﬁcients

r degree of rotational stiffness per unit distance in x direction at centerline of the plate

W displacement of a point of the middle surface of the plate in a direction normal to the undeformed middle sur-

face non-dimensional form of the displacement of a point of the middle surface of the plate in a direction normal

to the undeformed middle surface

x, y Cartesian coordinates

a stress gradient parameter

C non-dimensional form of the degree of rotational stiffness, deﬁned by C ¼ r Db

n, g natural coordinates

m elastic Poisson’s ratio

{q} vector of inﬁnitesimal buckling curvatures

ry yield stress of material

/ aspect ratio of plate, deﬁned by / ¼ ba

Galerkin method, he found that the theoretical approach developed is rational, and provided a good engineering estimating

for the elastic buckling load. A sinusoidal function was used along the loaded edges and polynomial function in the unloaded

edges to approximate the out-of-plane deﬂection. Rhodes and Harvey [5] used the Ritz method for examining plates sub-

jected to eccentric end displacement in the transverse direction. Lau and Hancock [6] presented a spline ﬁnite strip method

for analyzing plates subjected to combined bending and compression with boundaries other than simply supported loaded

edges. Bradford [7] developed non-linear stiffness equations for the buckling capacity of longitudinal stiffeners in girder web

plate subjected to in-plane bending and compression using a ﬁnite strip analysis. Cohen [8] arrived at an approximate equa-

tion for elastic buckling coefﬁcients of plates subjected to maximum compression at the supported edge and maximum ten-

sion at the free edge using the ﬁnite difference approach. Bedair and Sherbourne [9] derived an expression for estimating the

buckling capacity of plate/stiffener assemblies under non-uniform edge compression, which was veriﬁed numerically using

the Galerkin method. Saadatpour et al. [10] investigated buckling of arbitrary quadrilateral plates with intermediate sup-

ports using the Galerkin method. Madhaven and Davidson [11] studied buckling of centerline-stiffened plates subjected

to uniaxial eccentric compression. Their research included elastic local buckling only. In general, the literature described

above was carried out on elastic buckling of plates.

Although it is possible to obtain the buckling capacity of a non-uniform loaded stiffened plate system by isolating the

higher-stressed half of the plate and applying a rotational stiffness along one edge, the solution is dependent upon the buck-

ling mode. In addition, the buckling mode depends on both the gradient of stress applied and the rotational stiffness pro-

vided by the lesser-stressed half plate.

This paper presents a solution approach that clearly and in detail considers the full width of the stiffened plates and both

elastic and inelastic local buckling of this type of plate are examined. The Galerkin method is used to establish an eigenvalue

problem, and a series solution of the plate buckling coefﬁcients is obtained by using combined trigonometric and polynomial

functions that satisfy the boundary conditions.

The overall objective of the research represented in this paper is to quantify the elastic and inelastic buckling capacity of a

plate subjected to a stress gradient with varying rotational stiffness at the center. The results obtained in the present paper

are useful to design of stiffened plate subjected to combined ﬂexure and compression.

Fig. 1 shows an isotropic, elastic rectangular plate of length ‘a’ and width ‘b’. Dimensionless coordinates are used to facil-

itate solving the problem. As can be seen, the plate is subjected to non-uniform compression in which ‘a’ represents the gra-

1876 E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885

dient of this compression. Since Azhari and Bradford [12] proved that the restraint of loaded edges with aspect ratio more

than three has a marginal effect on the buckling stress of long plates, simply supported boundary condition is chosen for

transverse edges. The stiffener provides a deﬁnite rotational stiffness for the plate and there is no out-of plane displacement

across the location of stiffener.

The use of polynomials with trigonometric functions facilitates rapid and easy satisfaction of a wide variety of boundary

conditions. In the present method, a sine function is applied for ‘n’ direction while a polynomial function is used for ‘g’ direc-

tion, because deriving a pure trigonometric function that represents the deﬂected shape is difﬁcult and a combined trigono-

metric and a polynomial function would be suitable.

The theoretical development begins with von Karman plate equations and proceeds to obtain the deﬂection function

using Galerkin series. The Galerkin series corresponds to the deﬂection function in the transverse direction, with an addi-

tional rotational stiffness at the placement of stiffener. This leads to three boundaries with two conditions. Six equations

and a general polynomial with six constants were chosen for the deﬂection function. Section 3 describes the theoretical

development.

The equation that describes the behavior of a thin elastic plate subjected to in-plane compression in x direction may be

written as

!

o4 w o4 w o4 w N x o2 w

4

þ 2 2 2

þ 4

þ ¼0 ð1Þ

ox ox oy oy D ox2

in which

Et 3

D¼ ; ð2Þ

12ð1 m2 Þ

where ‘E’, ‘t’ and ‘m’ are Young’s modulus, thickness of plate and Poisson’s ratio, respectively.

As shown in Fig. 1 the magnitude of in-plane stress at centerline of plate is N0 and the stress variation imparted such that

the applied load on the higher-stressed edge is N0(1 + a) and the lesser-stressed edge N0(1 a). The stress gradient param-

eter a is a measure of the stress gradient introduced in the plate. For example, a would be the ratio of minor axis bending to

major axis bending stresses in the compression ﬂange plates of an I-girder subjected to combined lateral and vertical bend-

ing. The solution is derived for a from 0 (uniform stress) to 1 (triangular stress), therefore it is limited to applications where

the full width of the plate is subjected to compression

0 6 a 6 1: ð3Þ

The equations of applied loads for the plate illustrated in Fig. 1 may be expressed as

h yi

Nx ¼ N 0 1 þ a 2a : ð4Þ

b

To facilitate the solution of the problem and to preserve clarity of presentation, Eq. (1) is non-dimensionalized by

substituting

E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885 1877

x yþb a w

n¼ ; g¼ ; /¼ ; W¼ ð5Þ

a b b t

in which ‘a’ and ‘b’ are length and width of the plate, respectively, where ‘W’ is non-dimensional form of the displacement of

the middle surface of the plate in a direction normal to the undeformed middle surface.

According to Eq. (5) derivatives of ‘W’ can be written as

o4 w 1 o4 W o4 w 1 o4 W o4 w 1 o4 W

¼ 4 ; ¼ 4 ; ¼ : ð6Þ

ox 4 a on4 oy 4

b og

4 2

ox oy 2 2 2

a2 b ox oy

2

!

2

1 o4 W o4 W o4 W N0 b o2 W

2 4

þ2 2

þ /2 þ ½1 þ 3a 2ag 2 ¼ 0: ð7Þ

/ on on og2 og4 D on

Eq. (7) can be simpliﬁed to yield a fourth-order partial differential equation with variable coefﬁcients for which a closed form

solution would be difﬁcult if not impossible to obtain. For this reason, the eigenvalue problem was solved using the Galer-

kin’s series method. The loaded edges of the plate are assumed to be simply supported and can be shown that sine functions

satisfy the boundary conditions at the edges

" #

o2 W

¼ 0; ð8Þ

on2 n¼0;1

½Wn¼0;1 ¼ 0: ð9Þ

For edges (g = 1 and g = 2) that can be free, simply supported or clamped, one category of the following equations must be

satisﬁed, respectively.

For free boundary conditions

8h 2 2

i

>

< oogW2 þ /m2 oonW2 ¼ 0;

g¼1;2

h3 i ð10aÞ

>

: o W3 þ ð2mÞ o3 W

¼ 0:

og /2 ogon2 g¼1;2

8

< ½Wg¼1;2 ¼ 0;

h2 i ð10bÞ

: oogW2 ¼ 0:

g¼1;2

8

< ½Wg¼1;2 ¼ 0;

h i ð10cÞ

: oW

og

¼ 0:

g¼1;2

At g = gS there is no out-of-plane displacement and is rotationally stiffened. So the boundary conditions at g = gS are [11]

8

< ½Wg¼gS ¼ 0;

h2 2

i ð11Þ

: oogW2 þ m2 o W2 C oW

og

¼ 0:

/ on g¼gS

where

b

C¼r ; ð12Þ

D

r is the rotational stiffness per unit length along the centerline stiffens and C is the non-dimensional form of rotational

stiffness.

The solution of Eq. (7) is taken in the form

XX

W¼ qmn fm ðnÞg n ðgÞ; ð13Þ

m n

where

and

g n ðgÞ ¼ gnþ6 þ An gnþ5 þ Bn gnþ4 þ C n gnþ3 þ Dn gnþ2 þ En gnþ1 þ F n gn : ð15Þ

1878 E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885

The function fm(n) exactly describes the deﬂection of the loaded edges. The function gn(g) is taken as a polynomial with six

constants (six boundary conditions). These constants are evaluated by applying Eqs. (10) and (11).

The constants are substituted into Eq. (15) to get the deﬂection function corresponding to the number of series

X

W¼ qn sin mpn½gnþ6 þ An gnþ5 þ Bn gnþ4 þ C n gnþ3 þ Dn gnþ2 þ En gnþ1 þ F n gn : ð16Þ

n¼1;2;3;...

For simplicity

W ¼ Y sin mpn; ð17Þ

where

X

Y¼ qn ½g n ðgÞ: ð18Þ

n

The number of half waves ‘m’ in Eq. (17) depends on the aspect ratio of the plate (/), the centerline rotational stiffness (C),

and the applied stress gradient (a). Indeed ‘m’ indicates the mode shape that the plate buckles.

Substituting Eq. (17) into Eq. (7) leads to an expression that is simpliﬁed to a fourth order differential equation. The ﬁnal

form of the governing differential equation is

4 2

d Y m2 p2 d Y m4 p4 m2 p2

2 2 þ Y Kx ð1 þ 3a 2agÞY ¼ 0; ð19Þ

dg4 / dg2 /4 /2

where

2

N0 b

Kx ¼ ð20Þ

D

in which K is deﬁned by Kx = kcrp2 and kcr is the plate buckling coefﬁcient.

oY

By applying Galerkin method and using oq n

as weigh functions, differential Eq. (19) can be solved

"

Z 2 4 2

#

d Y d Y 2 oY

2b 2 þ b Y Kbð1 þ 3a 2agÞY dg ¼ 0; ð21Þ

1 dg4 dg oqn

where

2

mp

b¼ : ð22Þ

/

Eq. (21) is reduced to Eq. (23) if a typical term of the Galerkin series for Y is taken as qjYj. The expression can then be written

as

Xn¼J Z 2" 4 2

#

d gn d gn 2

qn 2b þ b g n Kbð1 þ 3a 2agÞg n g j dg ¼ 0 ð23Þ

n¼0;1;... 1 dg4 dg2

in which J is the number of terms required for convergence. It can be seen from the above equations that, as n and j vary over

the range 0 6 (n, j) 6 J a square matrix of coefﬁcients results. The matrix can be represented by

2 32 3

ðL00 KM 00 Þ ðL01 KM 01 Þ ... ðL0J KM0J Þ q0

6 .. 76 . 7

6 ðL KM Þ . 76 . 7

6 10 10 76 . 7

6 76 . 7 ¼ 0; ð24Þ

6 .. ... 76 . 7

4 . 54 . 5

ðLJ0 KM J0 Þ ... ... ðLJJ KMJJ Þ qJ

where

Z " #

2 4 2

d gm d gm 2

Lmn ¼ 2b þ b g m g n dg; ð25Þ

1 dg4 dg2

Z 2

Mmn ¼ b ½ð1 þ 3a 2agÞg m g n dg: ð26Þ

1

In Eqs. (25) and (26) [L] and [M] are stiffness and stability matrices, respectively.

The values of K only have meaning for the non-trivial values of qn, i.e. if the determinant of the above matrix is zero. It is

thus possible to obtain the required range of eigenvalues by equating the determinant to zero, expanding it, and solving the

resulting polynomial. The lowest real value would be the K value at which the plate buckles

E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885 1879

Local instability analysis of plates with stiffener subjected to shear stresses is important for design of plates and plate

structures.

Fig. 2 shows the stiffened plate subjected to uniform shear stress.

The equations governing the elastic behavior of a buckled elastic plate subjected to shear stress may be written as

o4 w o4 w o4 w 2N xy o2 w

þ2 2 2þ 4 þ ¼0 ð28Þ

ox4 ox oy oy D oxoy

in which Nxy is shear load per unit length.

By using the Eqs. (5) and (6) non-dimensional form of differential equation can be expressed by

2

1 o4 W 2 o4 W o4 W 2N xy b o2 W

4 4

þ 2 2

þ þ / ¼ 0: ð29Þ

/ on / on og2 og4 D onog

XX

W¼ qmn eimpn g n ðgÞ ð30Þ

m n

pﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ

in which i ¼ 1 and gn(g) is presented in Eq. (15).

Eq. (30) can be reduced to

W ¼ Y eimpn ð31Þ

in which ‘m’ is the number of half waves in the mode shapes. It depends on the aspect ratio of the plate (/) and the centerline

rotational stiffness (C).

Substituting Eq. (31) into Eq. (29) leads to a fourth order ordinary differential as follows:

4 2 2 4

mp mp d Y d Y mp dY

Y 2 þ þ 2iK SL ¼0 ð32Þ

/ / dg2 dg4 / dg

N b2

in which K SL ¼ xyD , kcr ¼ KpSL2 and Nxy = N0.

Applying Galerkin method an eigenvalue problem can be obtained by

j½L K SL ½Mj ¼ 0; ð33Þ

where [L], [M] are deﬁned by the following equations, respectively:

Z 2 2 4

!

d gm d gm

Lmn ¼ b2 g m 2b þ g n dg; ð34Þ

1 dg2 dg4

pﬃﬃﬃ Z 2 dg m

Mmn ¼ 2i b g n dg: ð35Þ

1 dg

The Galerkin method was used to calculate the relationship between plane normal stresses and shear stresses of plates with

stiffener. In this case, an eigenvalue problem can be obtained by

Fig. 2. Analytical model: rectangular plate with rotational stiffener subjected to shear stress.

1880 E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885

in which [M0 ] is deﬁned by the following equation:

Z 2

M 0mn ¼ b Y m Y n dg: ð37Þ

1

The interaction between plastic behavior and instability is important for stocky plates. The fact of the matter is that in

inelastic initial buckling analysis the stiffness matrix should be modiﬁed to include the effects of the altered stiffness prop-

erties of the material associated with the plastic deformation prior to buckling. The modiﬁcation is affected by altering out-

of-plane stiffness matrices so that they contain coefﬁcients which depend on the state of plasticity in the plate and therefore

on the state of stress. The modiﬁcation adopted depends on the inelastic plate buckling theory being used. The inelastic

buckling behavior of plates is quite sensitive to the plasticity theory deployed [13]. Generally there are two main concepts

for investigating the inelastic instability of plates which are deformation theory and ﬂow theory.

Studies that have been carried out by many researchers such as Ilyushin [14], Stowell [15] and Shirvastava [16] have

shown that deformation theory mainly have a good agreement with experimental results.

In the present paper ‘‘deformation theory” is employed to study inelastic behavior of stiffened plates. The relationship

between internal moments and curvatures is presented by the following equations [13]:

* +T

o2 w o2 w o2 w

fqg ¼ ; ; 2 ; ð39Þ

ox2 oy2 oxoy

fMg ¼ ½DF P fqg; ð40Þ

2 3

3

Dx D1 0

t 6 7

½DF P ¼ 4 D1 Dy 0 5; ð41Þ

12

0 0 Dxy

where

2Eðk 1 þ 2mÞ

D1 ¼ ; ð42Þ

kð5 4m þ 3eÞ ð1 2mÞ2

2Eðk þ 3 þ 3eÞ

Dx ¼ ; ð43Þ

kð5 4m þ 3eÞ ð1 2mÞ2

4Ek

Dy ¼ ; ð44Þ

kð5 4m þ 3eÞ ð1 2mÞ2

E

Dxy ¼ ð45Þ

2 þ 2m þ 3e

in which

E

k¼ ; ð46Þ

Et

E

e¼ 1 ð47Þ

Es

in which, Es and Et are secant modulus and tangent modulus, respectively. By applying Eq. (40) which related internal mo-

ment to curvatures of plate, the differential equation, governing the inelastic behavior of a buckled plate subjected to in-

plane compression in non-dimensional form may be written as

2

!

Dx o4 W o4 W 4

2o W 12rx b o2 W

þ ð2D1 þ 4Dxy Þ 2 þ Dy / þ ¼ 0: ð48Þ

/2 on4 on og2 og4 t2 on2

The solution of Eq. (48) is similar to Eqs. (13)–(15). Using the Galerkin method, Eq. (48) leads to an eigenvalue problem that

can be written by

in which

Z " 4 2

#

2

d gm d gm 2

Lmn ¼ Dy ð2D1 þ 4Dxy Þb þ Dx b g m g n dg ð50Þ

1 dg4 dg2

E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885 1881

Table 1

Buckling load coefﬁcients kcr for long plate and gS = 1.5

Unloaded edges boundary conditions C kcr for J = 4 kcr for J = 5 kcr for J = 6 kcr [12]

Simply supported 0 16.00 16.00 16.00 4 4.00 = 16.00

Simply supported 1 22.08 22.07 21.90 4 5.41 = 21.64

Clamped 0 21.64 21.64 21.64 4 5.41 = 21.64

Clamped 1 28.57 28.56 28.28 4 6.97 = 27.88

and

Z 2

Mmn ¼ b g m g n dg; ð51Þ

1

2

where K In ¼ 12rt2x b

As be mentioned before, Et and Es are variable depend on the state of stress rx. In the present paper for deriving numeric

results, mild steel properties adopted were E = 2 105 MPa, ry = 250 MPa, m = 0.3 and based on slip theory in the plastic

regions

E

Et ¼ ; ð52Þ

33

rx

Es ¼ ry : ð53Þ

11 E þ ðr ry Þ 33

E

5. Numerical results

5.1. General

A series solution was developed for evaluating the elastic buckling coefﬁcients and critical stress of a plate for initial

inelastic buckling with variable rotational stiffness at the center. The proposed procedure is programmed on the desktop

computer to generate results. The numerical results converged with six terms of the series which demonstrated in Table

1. The accuracy of the solution can be improved by increasing the number of terms.

38 33

35 30

32

27

29

kcr

24

kcr

26

21

23

18

20

17 15

14 12

0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5

27 26

24

24

22

20

21

kcr

kcr

18

18 16

=

14

15

12

12 10

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Fig. 3. Variation of buckling coefﬁcients with aspect ratio for different stress gradient ratios.

1882 E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885

14 12

12

10

10

8

8

kcr

kcr

6

6

4

4

2

2

0 0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

10 8

8

6

kcr

kcr

4

4

2

2

0 0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Fig. 4. Variation of buckling coefﬁcients with aspect ratio for different stress gradient ratios.

41 38

38 35

35

32

32

kcr

kcr

29

29

26

26

23 23

20 20

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

31 30

29

27

27

25 24

kcr

kcr

23

21 21

19

18

17

15 15

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Fig. 5. Variation of buckling coefﬁcients with aspect ratio for different stress gradient ratios.

To demonstrate the versatility and accuracy of the method deployed herein, local buckling coefﬁcient for upper and lower

limit of rotational stiffness of stiffener are compared with those obtained by Bradford and Azhari [12] using the ﬁnite strip

method in Table 1.

E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885 1883

Figs. 3–5 illustrate the change in buckling coefﬁcient with aspect ratio for stress gradient ratios varying from a = 0 to 1, for

simply supported, free and clamped unloaded edges, respectively. Each plot indicates the number of half waves at which the

plate buckles for a given aspect ratio. In Figs. 3–5 it can be observed that there is a decrease in the plate buckling coefﬁcient

Table 2

Shear buckling coefﬁcients for ordinary plates

S 5.3363 5.3363

N0

C

N0

8.9779 8.9778

Table 3

Shear buckling coefﬁcients for centerline stiffened plate

S C kcr

N0 0 21.87

10 25.97

20 27.72

1 29.31

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Fig. 6. Interaction curve for local elastic buckling in shear and compression (for C = 20).

1884 E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885

1.8

Galerkin method

1.6

F.S.M.[13]

elastic buckling

1.4

1.2

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

b/t* y

Table 4

Critical stress for a centerline stiffened plate with deﬁnite properties

S.S. rcr 3

E 10 3.22 5.55 7.80 9.53 15.94 35.80

Supported

Supported

Stiffener

Simply

Simply

S.S.

r = 270 (kN), a = 80 (cm), b = 20 (cm), and gS = 1.5.

values with an increase in stress gradient. Similarly, for each stress gradient ratio there is an increase in plate buckling coef-

ﬁcient values with increase in centerline rotational stiffness. The rotational stiffness C = 0 represents a simply supported cen-

terline condition and C = 1 represents clamped condition.

The range of values between the two extremes represents partial ﬁxity (i.e. the effect of varying elastic rotational stiff-

ness). The number of half waves in the mode shapes depends on the aspect ratio of the plate (/), the centerline rotational

stiffness (C), and the applied stress gradient (a). With increase in rotational stiffness and aspect ratio, there is an increase in

the number of half waves.

Firstly, the method deployed to evaluate of local buckling coefﬁcients of ordinary plates without stiffener under shear

stress in order to assess the efﬁcacy of the Galerkin method.

The shear buckling coefﬁcients for long ordinary plates presented in Table 2.

Table 3 shows the local buckling coefﬁcients obtained for a centerline stiffened plate which has simply supported edges.

As the table shows, there is a moderate increase in buckling coefﬁcients by increasing the rotational stiffness provided.

The interaction curve for elastic local buckling of stiffened plate under combined in-plane and shear stresses has been

investigated. Fig. 6 shows buckling stresses rcr and scr normalized with respect to the values rcr 0 and scr 0 in pure compres-

sion stresses and shear only, respectively.

In order to demonstrate the validity and accuracy of the method, the developed method has been used to study inelastic

initial buckling of a square plate without stiffener and results have been compared with ﬁnite strip method which analyzed

by Azhari and Bradford [13]. As it is seen in (Fig. 7), there is a good agreement between two methods.

E. Jaberzadeh, M. Azhari / Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2009) 1874–1885 1885

Inelastic initial local buckling for a plate with centerline stiffener (gS = 1.5) was studied. Table 4 shows the values of crit-

ical stress for different thicknesses. It is seen that critical stress increase with increasing of plate’s thickness.

6. Conclusions

The effect of stress gradient on the elastic buckling behavior of plates with centerline boundary conditions was investi-

gated for different boundary conditions. A governing differential equation in Cartesian coordinates for a plate subjected to

stress gradient with a variable rotational stiffness was formulated and solved using the Galerkin method. The solution re-

sulted in a mathematical relationship between buckling capacity and the plate aspect ratio, the applied stress gradient,

and the centerline rotational stiffness. This solution for the buckling capacity of plates with variable eccentric loading com-

bined with variable rotational stiffness at the centerline is applicable for stiffened plates and I-shaped beams.

Differential equation of a plate subjected to shear stress developed and local buckling coefﬁcients obtained for a plate

with centerline stiffener. Also the problem was developed for inelastic initial buckling and results have been presented

for a centerline-stiffened plate.

Applications include stiffened plates for example the ﬂanges of beams that are subjected to major axis bending combined

with signiﬁcant lateral forces (minor axis bending) or torsion (warping normal stresses), which results in a stress gradient

across the width of the ﬂange plates and shear stress can be included. This research shown that the Galerkin method is very

efﬁcient computationally moreover is a very simple procedure.

References

[1] S.P. Timoshenko, J.M. Gere, Theory of Elastic Stability, second ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1961.

[2] J.H. Johnson, R.G. Noel, Critical bending stress for ﬂat rectangular plates supported along all edges and elastically restrained against rotation along the

unloaded compression edge, J. Aeronaut. Sci. (1953) 535–540.

[3] A.C. Walker, Local instability in plates and channel struts, J. Struct. Eng. Div. ASCE 92 (3) (1966) 39–55.

[4] A.C. Walker, Flat rectangular plates subjected to linearly varying edge compressive loading, in: A.H. Chilver (Ed.), Thin Walled Structures, John Wiley

and Sons, New York, 1967.

[5] J. Rhodes, J.M. Harvey, Effects of eccentricity of load or compression on the buckling and post-buckling behavior of ﬂat plates, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 13 (1971)

867–879.

[6] S.C.W. Lau, G.J. Hancock, Buckling of thin ﬂat-walled structures by a spline ﬁnite strip method, Thin Wall Struct. 4 (1986) 269–294.

[7] M.A. Bradford, Buckling of longitudinally stiffened plates in bending and compression, Can. J. Civil Eng. 16 (1989) 607–614.

[8] J.M. Cohen, Elastic buckling coefﬁcients for long unstiffened plates, J. Eng. Mech. 118 (12) (1992) 2491–2496.

[9] O.K. Bedair, A.N. Sherbourne, Plate/stiffener assemblies under non uniform edge compression, J. Struct. Eng. 11 (1995) 1603–1612.

[10] M.M. Saadatpour, M. Azhari, M.A. Bradford, Buckling of quadrilateral plates with intermediate supports using the Galerkin method, Comput. Meth.

Appl. Mech. Eng. 164 (1998) 297–306.

[11] M. Madhavan, J.S. Davidson, Buckling of centerline-stiffened plates subjected to uniaxial eccentric compression, Thin Wall Struct. 43 (2005) 1264–

1276.

[12] M.A. Bradford, M. Azhari, Buckling of plates with different end conditions using the ﬁnite strip method, Comput. Struct. 56 (1995) 75–83.

[13] M. Azhari, M.A. Bradford, Inelastic initial local buckling of plates with and without residual stresses, Eng. Struct. 15 (1993) 31–39.

[14] A.A. Ilyushin, The elasto-plastic stability of plates, Technical Memorandum NACA, No. 1188, 1947.

[15] E.Z. Stowell, A uniﬁed theory of plastic buckling of columns and plates, Technical Note NACA, No. 1556, 1948.

[16] S.C. Shirvastava, Inelastic buckling of plates including shear effects, Int. J. Solids Struct. 15 (1979) 567–575.

[17] R.J. Plank, W.H. Wittrick, Buckling under combined loading of thin ﬂat-walled structures by a complex ﬁnite strip method, J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 14

(1974) 323–339.

- Recent Developments in Finite Element AnalysisUploaded byVignesh Chellappan Natarajan
- Comparison of Ansi Aisc 360-05 to 1989 Asd SpecificationUploaded byRicardo MG
- DNV - RP-C201 Buckling Strength of Plated StructuresUploaded byfranciscohreyes
- Copy of SAP2000 Verification 1400Uploaded byNixesh M S Rajbhandari
- Rudman Investigtation 2009Uploaded bymahbub1669
- 646_Optimised Aluminium Vehicle Front Section - Public VersionUploaded byJony M. Temnikar
- Working with single-angle membersUploaded bywaleedishaque
- Nasa Beam+Column StabilityUploaded bybrahmendra
- Design of Concrete ShearWallUploaded byOmar Hadri
- Background to EurocodesUploaded byhmonckton
- Cornell ReportUploaded byAE
- SSRC 2010 P1003Uploaded byMetwally Abu-Hamd
- SSP Design GuidelinesUploaded byDavid Shutte
- 342Uploaded byNgườiđẹptrai Nhấtvũtrụ
- Steel_Ch5 Beam Column 1Uploaded byomar45
- Buckling strength of hydraulic cylindersUploaded byiescobarz
- Handbook Engineering Section12 Transportation Ch83Uploaded byİsmail Salman
- Buckling of StrutsUploaded byJoshua Reynolds
- stabilityUploaded bytimsyki
- Me 356 Car Frame Design Write UpUploaded byKate Braber
- LAME Buckling ChecksUploaded byBen Clack
- Design of Conical Roof Structure of Liquid Sulphur Storage TankUploaded bySaravanan S
- Validation Manual.pdfUploaded byIoana Codrea Ortelecan
- 1-s2.0-S0263823198000469-mainUploaded byArya Prihutama
- Birdge New InteriorUploaded byRenxiang Lu
- Prediction of the Flexural Strengths of Welded H-sections With Local BucklingUploaded bystevantetekonde
- The Iler 2013Uploaded byChiara Boccaletto
- Lec 4a - Commpression MembersUploaded byumair
- Post BucklingUploaded bythao
- Buckling_of_arch_bridge.pdfUploaded byVignesh Vicky

- Lateral Torsional Buckling of I-beamsUploaded byRobert Vochescu
- Design of Partially or Fully Composite BeamsUploaded bybauemmvss
- R3DGenRefUploaded byMatthew DeFazio
- 2013-09-25 19-12Uploaded bybauemmvss
- C. Complex NumbersUploaded byanons2472
- 2013-09-09 21-39Uploaded bybauemmvss
- 4 SolutionUploaded bybauemmvss
- 108963_4414677_CHW4Uploaded bybauemmvss
- Foundation v 2Uploaded bybauemmvss
- Connection 2Uploaded bybauemmvss
- Connection 1Uploaded bybauemmvss
- Calculations v 2Uploaded bybauemmvss
- Finite Elements in Engineering ChandrupatlaUploaded byTahsinul Haque Tasif
- Finite Element Analysis in structures.Uploaded byMac Zephyr Bist
- 4nodeUploaded bybauemmvss
- Viswanathan 2015 IOP Conf. Ser.%3A Earth Environ. Sci. 23 012006Uploaded bybauemmvss
- vensko_matt_j_2008.pdfUploaded bybauemmvss
- Robot 2010 Training Manual MetricUploaded byanhkiem1980
- MGpaper FinalUploaded bybauemmvss
- Mech Science Personal CopyUploaded bybauemmvss
- MDOT Research Report R1519 250368 7Uploaded bybauemmvss
- Inelastic Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Beam-columns Proc. ASCEUploaded bybauemmvss
- Euler s FormulaUploaded bybauemmvss
- euler.pdfUploaded bybauemmvss
- Ansys Solids1Uploaded byapi-3833671
- Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel BeamsUploaded byapirakq

- CE2352 DSS 2 Marks With AnswerUploaded bykavithamartin28
- Finite Element Modeling Strategies for Sandwich Composite Laminates UnderUploaded bygemagdy
- ABOLLADURA 1Uploaded byDavid Casarrubias A
- 125760133 Buckling of Thin Metal Shells 58Uploaded bypawkom
- INDIA Supra Rule Book 2015Uploaded byAshish Kumar Doharey
- Buckling 04Uploaded bythanzawtun1981
- Design Certification Offshore FrpUploaded byHoney Tiwari
- 2-Lectures LEC 13Uploaded byNagaraj Ramachandrappa
- Part-1Uploaded byAnilMohanK
- Saisch . Chapter 1Uploaded byMike Matshona
- E9.4422Uploaded bypibebart
- sdsadUploaded bycodigocarnet
- Design of Integrally Stiffened Shell StructuresUploaded byIRJET Journal
- CLT Structural DesignUploaded bySharonda Castillo
- Seismic Resistance of Steel Plate Shear WallsUploaded byNasarKhan
- Steel Frame ClassificationUploaded bybsitler
- Portal Frame Design PresentationUploaded byozbuild
- 17511775 Buckling Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Domes an Excel Spreadsheet by Nanette South Clark (1)Uploaded byTanya Henry
- StAccMill Stack DesignUploaded bykselvan_1
- 0192 Design Optimization of Eot Crane BridgeUploaded byJignesh Tala
- Column Buckling NotesUploaded byafegao2
- hygrothermal analysisUploaded byعمرو دراغمة
- Hollowblock Slabs AnalysisUploaded byqaisalkurdy
- Buckling of ShellsUploaded byOSCARDELTA
- UB5 Steel beam analysis & design (BS5950Uploaded byyambalaoingjr
- Frame Buckling NotesUploaded byAaditya Pevekar
- 1400 Window Calculation PackageUploaded byLeomarini Rodríguez Ureña
- BE - CIVIL - III Year - Scheme and SyllabusUploaded byamoghlingamalla
- Prodotti Castalia 2202 Catbd18eb56Uploaded byNanjunda Swamy
- Space FramesUploaded byNajib Kiwan