Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study on
n Mechanical Properties of E-Glass Polypropylene
Epoxy and S-Glass
Glass Polypropylene Epoxy Composites
Karthik A. S1, Dr. S. V. Gorabal2
1
Assistant Professor, 2Principal
1
Smt Kamala and Sri Venkappa M. Agadi College of Engineering & Technology, Laxmeshwar, Karnataka
2
Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belgaum, Karnataka,, India
ABSTRACT
There are basic two phase of composite material, in discontinuous or continuous fibers. The matrix
which one is known as matrix material and another enables the composite to withstand compression,
one is called reinforcing material. The reinforcing flexural and shear forces or tensile loads. The polymer
material is embedded over matrix material. The material for a matrix can be thermosetting or
matrix material is continuous phase and reinforcing is thermoplastic resins. Thermoset
ermoset resins, in the
discontinuous phase. The reinforcing phase is muc
much presence of a catalyst reaction or cure. Once cured
harder than matrix phase. In composite material these material can no longer flow. Thermosetting
matrix phase removes the stresses between reinforcing resins such as epoxies, bismaldeimides and cyanates
phase and also protect from mechanical and can provide good strength properties. Thermoplastic
environmental damage. The function of reinforcing resins are normally solids att room temperature but
material is to improve mechanical and thermal soften or melt when heated to elevated temperatures
properties of composites. Composite are hybrid of two and become solid when cooled. Typical thermoplastic
or more material such as reinforced polymer, metal or resins include polymide, polyamide, polyphony lene
ceramics. The aim of the present work is to fabricate sulphide (PPS), polyether ether ketone (PEEK),
E-glass epoxy composite and S--glass epoxy polyethylene terephthalate (PET),
(PET and
composite with polypropylene as filler material. The polyetherulfone. Thus specialty epoxy resins and
fabricated laminates
aminates are then tested for mechanical curing agent designed for use in high performance
properties with varying percentage of filler material. composites have excellent elevated temperature
The results obtained for E-glass
glass epoxy composite and resistance, good mechanical properties, low water
S-glass
glass epoxy composites are then compared. The absorption and relatively high glass transition
composites with optimum results are recommended. temperature.
rature. Hence a proper combination of epoxy
resin, modifying resin, reinforcing fiber, curing agent
Keywords: E-glass, S-glass,
glass, Polypropylene, Impact and processing procedure are required to take full
strength advantages of their properties. Since the relatively low
strength polymers can be converted into high strength
str
I. INTRODUCTION composites by reinforcement, this field of the
A. Matrix Material composite industry is well established and is growing
A variety of matrix polymer, metal, alloy, inter faster into newer application. [1]
metallic, ceramics, carbon, cement etc. have been
used for making composites. The matrix material B. Reinforcement
serves several functions which are vital to the The reinforcement for composites may be in the form
performance of the composite material. These of particles, whiskers, fibers, lamellae or a mesh. The
functions also depend upon the type of reinforcement increase the strength, stiffness or modify the failure
such as dispersions,
ersions, particulates, whispers, mechanism advantageously. There can be special
cases where the fibers may conduct or resist heat and
@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 5 | Jul-Aug 2018 Page: 572
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470
5P-6P-4S-7P-4E-8P-5S-9P-5E-10P-6E-6S for
GFRP (E-Glass S-Glass Polypropylene).
VII. Experimentation
A. Ultimate tenile test
Figure VI. Impact Test for (GFRP2) (SP)
@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 5 | Jul-Aug 2018 Page: 573
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470
2456
C. Brinell Hardness Test
VIII. Results
Table VI. Ultimate tensile strength (UTS), Impact
and Hardness of GFRP1 and GFRP2
Composites UTS Impact Hardness
(MPA) (J/mm2) (BHN)
GFRP1(EP) 178 0.365 79
GFRP2(SP) 240.23 0.421 83
@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 5 | Jul-Aug 2018 Page: 575