1 views

Original Title: Survey of Methods of Combining Velocity Profiles With Position Control

Uploaded by khoamai

- A Proposed DC Motor Sliding Mode Position Controller Design using Fuzzy Logic and PID Techniques
- Control System Lab Ce110 Servo Trainer Answer
- Governing Principles
- Bioprocesses parameters control
- dead beat control
- Adaptive Control
- Process Dynamics and Control. 2nd Edition - Dale E. Seborg (2003)
- Chapter 12 Chang
- MSE 490 Final Project Paper
- Guide to EEV
- Control Lab Manual Final
- Gas Flow Controller Manual
- 2216E-OPR.pdf
- Boiler Essential Controls
- 53187886
- MECH304 Spring 2017 Syllabus
- How PID Works
- Functional%20Description
- ElectricDrive Spring2012 Mid
- 55404146-Control

You are on page 1of 6

Position control

Petter Karlsson

Mälardalen University

P.O. Box 883

72123 Västerås, Sweden

pkn09001@student.mdh.se

ABSTRACT

In many applications where some kind of motion is per-

formed, for example in robotics, it is of high importance

to be able to control how a certain angular motor position is 1a: Jerk profile

0.02

reached. To this end, motion profiles are used. These pro-

files often define how the velocity varies during the traversal

3

pulses/s

from the starting position to the desired position. It is rel-

0

atively easy to let a controller act on the set velocity and

a velocity feedback to achieve decent velocity following, but

not as easy to also make sure that the correct position is −0.02

kept along the route as well as in the end. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

time

In this paper, four approaches to manage position control 1b: Acceleration profile

alongside velocity profiles are presented and discussed. The 2

first approach is based on continuous velocity control in an

2

pulses/s

are present and the velocity measurement is very exact, this 0

approach could work, but it is hardly worth the effort. This

approach can be improved by switching to a distance-based

control scheme near the end. Another approach is to use −2

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

position control by incrementally adding to the set position. time

The last approach discussed is a cascaded P-PI controller 1c: Velocity profile

where both velocity and position is considered. 150

100

pulses/s

Keywords

50

Motion control, position control

0

1. INTRODUCTION −50

In motion control applications, velocity profiles are used in 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

time

order to achieve a controlled acceleration and deceleration 4

x 10 1d: Position profile

with respect to desired velocity and position. In contrast 6

to pure PID (proportional, integral and derivative) position

control, this gives the system a much higher level of de- 4

pulses

motion can be controlled, such as traversal time, velocity, ac- 2

celeration/deceleration and jerk (derivative of acceleration).

0

In short, motion profiles are used when it is important where

you get but also how you get there. 0 100 200 300 400 500 600

time

derivatives, giving continuous acceleration (1b) as

well as smooth velocity (1c) and position(1d) pro-

files.

Depending on what characteristics are needed for the mo- giving the approximate Laplace transfer function

tion, different profiles can be used. The basic profile is the

ω K

trapezoidal velocity profile, where the first segment of the =

profile is a constant acceleration phase. This phase is fol- V (Js + b)(Ls + R) + K 2

lowed by a constant velocity phase and the profile ends with where ω is the angular velocity and V is the input voltage

a constant deceleration phase ending at the set position. [4].

Problems could arise using this approach, because the steps

in acceleration will produce impulses in jerk. To remedy In all the controller models the voltage saturates at ±100V ,

this, an S-curve profile can be used. In this profile, the meaning that the maximum absolute value of the voltage

phases of constant acceleration/deceleration are replaced by fed to the motor is 100V . This is done to ensure that the

linearly increasing and decreasing acceleration/deceleration, simulations are somewhat realistic.

see Figure 1. This approach will instead produce finite steps

of jerk that are much more manageable. For purposes of simplicity, the profile used in all simulations

will be a trapezoidal velocity profile.

One of the big problems of combining velocity profiles with

position control of any system is that of generating a smooth

deceleration, stopping at the set position without creep or

1.2 Terms

p : Actual (measured) position.

abrupt stop. If the motion is decelerated too early, forc-

p∗ : Set position (desired position).

ing a slower motion while reaching for the set position, the

v : Actual (measured) velocity.

throughput of a system can be lowered. An abrupt stop, on

v ∗ : Set velocity (desired velocity).

the other hand, may cause damage to equipment or have a

S : Distance between p and p∗ .

negative impact on the comfort of, for example, an eleva-

P controller : Proportional controller. The output is pro-

tor ride [5]. Both of these problems can give rise to syn-

portional to the error.

chronization issues in multi-axis environments such as CNC

PI controller : Proportional-integral controller. The output

machinery or robot drives and manipulators.

is proportional to the error and the integral of the error.

PID controller : Proportional-integral-derivative controller.

The purpose of this paper is to survey methods of reaching

The output is proportional to the error as well as the inte-

the set position, using a velocity profile, while minimizing

gral and derivative of the error.

or eliminating the problems of creep and abrupt stop. This

paper will not go into details of tuning systems based on

the different methods or how to handle disturbance rejec-

tion. The methods presented will be evaluated on a proof-of- 2. CONTROL APPROACHES

concept basis using MATLAB/Simulink simulations to de- 2.1 Velocity Control

termine whether the method is suitable for reaching a set One way of using velocity profiles is to use a PID controller

position using a velocity profile. to control the velocity of the motor based on time, see Figure

2. The integral property of the controller will make sure

In section 1.1, the methods involved in producing the re- that the set position to be expected at the end of the profile

sults in this paper are presented. It is followed by a short is eventually approached. This is of course based on the

description of the terms and abbreviations used throughout (not very plausible) assumption that exact, continuous speed

the paper in section 1.2. The different control approaches measurements can be performed on the system.

surveyed in this paper are described in section 2 and the

paper ends with the conclusions in section 3. One way to prove this is to note that the angular position p

of the motor equals the integral of velocity over time. The

1.1 Method integral term of the PID controller, denoted I, will accumu-

The suitability of each approach will be determined by sim- late all of the error between set velocity v ∗ and measured

ulation using MATLAB/Simulink. In the simulations I will velocity v over time (see equation 1), thus expressing the

use the transfer function of a hypothetical motor to test the remaining distance S to the end point multiplied by a fac-

different approaches. Values for the different gains in the tor k. Now we can conclude that there is a linear relation

controller, as well as sample intervals where applicable, are between the integral term and the remaining distance to set

chosen arbitrarily to represent a stable system. No distur- position p∗ (see equation 2).

bances or static friction is modeled, as that would not con-

tribute significantly to the results of this paper. The motor

model that is used in the simulations, represented as ”Motor” Z

in the controller models, has the following characteristics: I= k[v ∗ (t) − v(t)]dt = k[p∗ (t) − p(t)] (1)

I

• damping ratio of the mechanical system (b) = 0.1 Nms S = p∗ (t) − p(t) = (2)

k

• electromotive force constant (K=Ke =Kt ) = 0.01 Nm/A

• electric resistance (R) = 1 Ω There are a few things to note here, though, rendering this

approach less useful in a real system. In the model of fig-

• electric inductance (L) = 0.5 H ure 2, friction is not modeled. As can be seen in figure 4,

Figure 2: A PID controller based on continuous and exact velocity measurements.

the integral term pushes the motor towards the set position

after the profile has been traversed. In reality, the friction

of the system would probably be too high for the output of

the integral term to overcome it, leading to an early stop in

Velocity following

this example. Further, most PID controllers are equipped

5

Velocity

with an anti-windup system, stopping the integral term from

4 growing uncontrollably. Once the anti-windup threshold has

Set velocity

been reached, the integral term won’t represent the missing

Velocity

3

distance to the set position any more.

2

1 There are, of course, other controllers that can be used with

0 this method but in order to be reasonably sure that the mo-

0 2 4 6 8

tor will end up close to the set position, an integral term

Time is necessary. The anti-windup threshold of this term would

have to be set rather high in order to guarantee that it will

Figure 3: Velocity following of (ideal) PID veloc- not usually be reached and the velocity measurement would

ity controller. The graph shows how the measured have to be continuous and extremely exact. These require-

velocity follows the velocity profile. ments are very hard to fulfill and this approach is therefore

very impractical.

trol

One way of overcoming the requirements of exact speed mea-

surements and high anti-windup threshold of the previous

method is to combine it with a distance-based velocity con-

trol when the set position is approached [5], as shown in

Position following figure 5.

15

In this approach, the deceleration phase is separated into

sub-phases. When a constant deceleration is achieved, the

10

Position

p

5

v ∗ = 2amax (S − Sof f )

Position , where amax is the maximum acceleration allowed, S is the

Set position distance remaining to the set position and Sof f is an offset

0

0 2 4 6 8 distance that is used to guarantee continuity in velocity at

Time the time where velocity pattern is switched. When the tar-

get position is approached closely, the pattern is once again

Figure 4: Position following of (ideal) PID veloc- switched to

ity controller. The graph shows how the measured v∗ = k ∗ S x

position follows the inferred position profile.

where k and x are chosen to guarantee acceptable settling

time and continuity of acceleration and velocity. This method

will however lead to a longer settling time and requires well-

tuned parameters in order to create a continuous velocity

Figure 5: Velocity follower with near-end position-based velocity.

5 Velocity 15

4 Set velocity

Velocity

3 10

Position

2

1

5

0 Position

0 2 4 6 8 Set position

Time 0

0 2 4 6 8

Time

Figure 7: Velocity following of PID controller based

on discretized position error. The graph shows how

Figure 8: Position following of PID controller based

the measured velocity follows the velocity profile.

on discretized position error. The graph shows how

the measured position follows the inferred position

profile.

profile. [5] instead proposes a system based on a cascaded

controller, similar to the setup which I will examine more

closely in section 2.4.

control system, the integrator works with the error position,

so as long as S > 0 the integral term will keep growing.

2.3 Incremental position control This will guarantee that as long as the system is stable, the

A method that is used in various motion control chips is a set position p will eventually be reached. One of the strong

kind of incremental position control [1]. Using a velocity advantages of this method is its simplicity; the only input

profile as a source, the expected position at every sample needed is a position feedback.

interval is calculated. The control signal applied is then

based on the difference between the expected position at the

next time step and the current position. This method will 2.4 Cascaded P-PI control

require a discrete system and the velocity is then preferably A setup as depicted in figure 9 will make sure that the ve-

expressed in the number of sensor pulses per control loop locity profile, as well as the position profile that can be in-

period. ferred from the velocity profile, is followed. The basic idea

is that the inner PI loop controls the velocity and that there

The example setup I have used is based on zero order hold is an additional outer loop consisting of the position error

circuits for discretization and uses a PID controller to min- multiplied by a gain. The PI loop will make sure that the

imize the position error according to figure 6, giving the velocity profile is followed (see figure 10) and the additional

position following of figure 8. P term will compensate for any mismatch of position that

occurs (see figure 11).The integral property of the PI loop

One way to avoid integration of the velocity feedback is to makes sure that any residual position error will eventually

use a position sensor instead. This could be an absolute en- be eliminated.

coder or, which is very common, an incremental quadrature

encoder [3]. In a discrete implementation of this controller, the current

velocity can quite easily be measured by differentiation of

This method makes the system independent of any velocity the position feedback. This makes it similar to the incre-

measurement, with the possible drawback of decreased pre- mental PID controller of section 2.3 but with the added

cision in velocity which can be hinted in figure 7. In this functionality of velocity control.

Figure 6: Velocity control based on discretized position error.

This approach is very powerful as good following of both ve-

locity and position profiles can be achieved. Concerning dis-

turbance rejection, there are improvements over this method

available, but they share the same basic concepts. One of

these is PI+, which is described in [2].

3. CONCLUSIONS

Velocity following We have now seen multiple ways of making sure that a set

5 Velocity

position is reached, following a velocity profile.

Set velocity

4 Using only velocity based control will not guarantee that

the set position is reached under all conditions. The two

Velocity

3

factors that make this approach nearly unusable is that a

2 continuous and very exact speed measurement is necessary

and that the anti-windup mechanism of the integral term

1 can destroy the linear connection between the terms value

0 and S.

0 2 4 6 8 The above situation can be solved by switching to a position-

Tim

based control method at a certain time, position, velocity

or acceleration. This approach has the downsides that the

Figure 10: Velocity following of a cascaded P-PI con- landing time will be increased and that the constants of the

troller. The graph shows how the measured velocity equations determining where to switch control method are

follows the velocity profile. hard to define.

tion control chips, is to control the position and velocity by

adding different values to the set position at regular inter-

vals. The value to add is calculated from the input velocity

profile. When using this method, no dedicated velocity feed-

back mechanism is needed and the complexity of the con-

troller is low. On the other hand, no direct control of the

velocity is achieved.

P-PI controller can be used. It consists of an inner loop,

controlling velocity, and an outer loop adjusting for any po-

sition mismatch along the way.

Position following This paper deals only with the problem of making sure that

15 position control is achieved alongside a velocity profile. A

continuation of this work could be an investigation of the

disturbance rejection properties of these and other methods.

10

Position

4. REFERENCES

[1] J. U. Cho and J. W. Jeon. A motion-control chip to

5

Position generate velocity profiles of desired characteristics.

Set position ETRI Journal, 27(5):563–568, October 2005.

0 [2] G. Ellis and R. D. Lorenz. Comparison of motion

0 2 4 6 8 control loops for industrial applications. IEEE IAS

Time Annual Meeting, 4:2599–2605, October 1999.

[3] R. O. Jr. Incremental optical encoder system

Figure 11: Position following of a cascaded P-PI con- forabsolute position measurement. US. patent,

troller. The graph shows how the measured position 4,079,251, August 1976.

follows the inferred position profile. [4] K. Ohishi, K. Ohnishi, K. Miyachi, and K. Tamaki.

Microprocessor-based robust control of a dc servo

motor. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 6(5):30–36,

October 1986.

[5] H.-M. Ryu and S.-K. Sul. Position control for direct

landing of elevator using time-based position pattern

generation. IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, 1:644–649,

October 2002.

- A Proposed DC Motor Sliding Mode Position Controller Design using Fuzzy Logic and PID TechniquesUploaded byerdsan
- Control System Lab Ce110 Servo Trainer AnswerUploaded bysapik87
- Governing PrinciplesUploaded byaspurohit4977
- Bioprocesses parameters controlUploaded byShaikh Muhammad Usama
- dead beat controlUploaded bySuvra Pattanayak
- Adaptive ControlUploaded byAhmet Halilovic
- Process Dynamics and Control. 2nd Edition - Dale E. Seborg (2003)Uploaded byRicardo Villalonga
- Chapter 12 ChangUploaded bysatya sagar
- MSE 490 Final Project PaperUploaded byKjellSadowski
- Guide to EEVUploaded byvlcekv
- Control Lab Manual FinalUploaded bySumathi Anand
- Gas Flow Controller ManualUploaded byPiyush Jaiswal
- 2216E-OPR.pdfUploaded bySanctaTiffany
- Boiler Essential ControlsUploaded byNagendra Prasad
- 53187886Uploaded byOmarHanif
- MECH304 Spring 2017 SyllabusUploaded byAlaa Shammaa
- How PID WorksUploaded byRavi Negi
- Functional%20DescriptionUploaded byManikandan Mohan
- ElectricDrive Spring2012 MidUploaded bybasab
- 55404146-ControlUploaded byluffy glory
- ABS System ControlUploaded byEfanYachaRezkyanto
- ReportUploaded byTimothy Fitzgerald Stratton
- 2014 Braking Performance Safety Performance Test ProcedureUploaded byMuhd Muzafar
- Control DesignUploaded bycifha dias
- Ch1 Automation & Control1Uploaded byMohamed Sayed Abdo
- LIBRARY FOR DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF SELFTUNING CONTROLLERSUploaded byVamshi Doneparthi
- 1 An Ankle Foot Emulation System for the Study of Human Walking Biomechanics.pdfUploaded byOmar LS
- 2920Uploaded byvsc2012
- CSE_1.2_RMUploaded byhari
- Oral Presentation in a Comm 2013Uploaded bysirneonash

- Development of a Versatile Robotic System With Multiple Training Modes for Upperlimb Rehabilitation Study 2168 9695.1000112Uploaded bykhoamai
- Haptic Collision Avoidance for a Remotely Operated Quadrotor UAV in Indoor EnvironmentsUploaded bykhoamai
- Trajectory Generation and Tracking Using the AR.drone 2.0 Quadcopter UAVUploaded bykhoamai
- Gstreamer IntroductionUploaded bykhoamai
- Analysis of a UAV That Can Hover and Fly LevelUploaded bykhoamai
- A Single-Input Two-Output Feedback Formulation for ANC ProblemUploaded bykhoamai
- Transition Flight Modeling of a Fixed-Wing VTOL UAVUploaded bykhoamai
- Control System Design of an Vtol Fixed-Wing AircraftUploaded bykhoamai
- MotorPrimerGaTech.pdfUploaded byJatin Tejani

- Basci Cons TransformerUploaded byven_avv3382
- Ch10 SolutionskUploaded byTensay Fekede
- edited general wave propertiesUploaded byapi-292550476
- BE - alternating current.pptxUploaded byDeepakDeep
- Taller ElectromagnetismoUploaded byBrayan Patiño
- Visscher 1Uploaded bypepitoman212
- AD0748995.PDF Relaxion ChamberUploaded byelectron84
- Technical Specification 22kv Swgr for 10mw Diesel Generator Power PlantUploaded byApichartj Jusuay
- as6Uploaded byTrip Adler
- Power Management of Solar based DC Microgrid System Enabled by Solid State TransformerUploaded byJaynendraSahu
- Foxcart MKII ManualUploaded byfarellano89
- Sluggish Data Sharing Hampers Reproducibility Effort _ Nature News & CommentUploaded bysorinproiecte
- ap physicsUploaded byapi-295869808
- 10.1.1.125Uploaded byosvi009
- DatasheetUploaded byechopiolo
- ELectric Loco TransformerUploaded byMegha Sharma
- E. U. Condon--Theory of Atomic SpectraUploaded byCristiana De Barcellos Passinato
- 12Uploaded byoanamaria
- 40_TestBank06Uploaded byKhairani Juliannisa
- 1461673582Physics-2013Uploaded bySenthil Kumar Ganesan
- 341316173-Bollhoff-the-Manual-of-Fastening-en-8100.pdfUploaded byOliver Kraus
- 7HC the Quantum Mechanical ModelUploaded bysanrorobby
- What is ConductivityUploaded byIqbal Hussain
- Theoretical Fluid MechanicsUploaded byArvin Sookram
- Terrestrial Stationary WavesUploaded byTHE NIKOLA TESLA INSTITUTE
- Snubber AN062 r1.2Uploaded byMarcelo Flavio Guepfrih
- Aos Metamaterial 29-10-2010 WeeklySeminarUploaded byMeenakshi Dhasmana
- ac ac converterUploaded bydevchandar
- 303935574-Design-and-Construction-of-Fm-Transmitter-Report.pdfUploaded bymamdouhkh
- TocUploaded byDude