2 views

Uploaded by Marciel Amorim

Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC)

- Parallel lines cut by a transversal
- Optical-Thermal Response
- Design of Thrust Blocks
- RadioPropBasics-ebook
- spencer-the_study_of_sociology
- C Angles of Elevation and Depression
- Terangganu-Answer Physics P3-Trial SPM 2007
- Maths 05
- ch1.ps
- lemh205
- Cherrynelle.docx
- UNIT-IV
- Heights & Distances
- Light
- Sahaj Academy
- 11_3_Angles_of_Elevation_and_Depression.ppt
- Curvature of Plane 00 Brun
- Srbl Mathemagician Level 2
- Geometry Demo Ppt
- hw week 2

You are on page 1of 10

Recursos

Theory and Use of Curved Surface Correction (CSC)

Software in Olympus NDT EPOCH Series Flaw

Detectors

Contemporary digital ultrasonic flaw detectors calculate commonly used parameters for reflector position in angle beam

testing, typically including sound path length, flaw depth, surface distance, and beam leg. These calculations are based on a

measured pulse transit time, calibrated material sound velocity and probe zero offset, and entered values for test piece

thickness, beam angle, and beam index point. By default, calculations assume a flat test piece. In the case of circumferential

inspection of tubular parts, the calculations must be adjusted for the effects of test piece curvature. This is done by means of a

mathematical correction based on entered outside and inside diameters of the test piece. The following topics will be

reviewed.

1. Mathematical Theory

2. Previous Approaches

3. Implementation of Curved Surface Correction in EPOCH series flaw detectors

4. Measurement examples

5. Use of contoured wedges

1. Mathematical theory

In the case of common flat plate tests and axially-oriented tests of pipes and similar products, leg length and reflector depth

and surface distance can be calculated through simple trigonometry through the formulas below. But when testing a curved

part in the circumferential direction, these formulas become inaccurate due to the curvature that effectively causes reflectors to

drop away from the probe, which lengthens the sound path and changes the reflection angle at the inside surface of the part.

For example, compare similar conditions for a 45° beam in flat and curved plates both 20 mm thick. The signal obtained at a

35mm sound path length in a flat plate corresponds to a reflector located at a depth of 15.2mm, 24.8mm from the exit point.

But the same 35 mm sound path in a 100mm diameter pipe corresponds to a reflector 19.2 mm deep from the OD surface and

31.7mm along the test surface from the exit point to the point over the reflector.

To correct for curvature, a number of mathematical relationships can be applied, based on the angles, measured sound path

and dimensions defined below. Utilizing these formulas with leg management enables proper calculation of surface projection

and vertical depth of flaws.

Legend for equations:

S = Surface Distance

Β = Angle of Refraction

Α = Sound path distance

t = Thickness

R1 = Inside Radius

R2 = Outside Radius

Βmax = Maximum angle of refraction

Ε = Angle of reflection at ID

Φ = Projection angle

D = Depth of reflector

1. Projection angle at ID (first leg)

Φ = sin-1(R2/R1 sinΒ)

Α = R1∗sin(Φ_Β)/sin(Β)

3. Depth of reflector D

D = R2 – √Α2 + R22 - 2R2ΑcosΒ

4. Surface distance S

S = ΠR2/180[sin-1(R2/R1 sinΒ)-Β] Note: for first leg test, R1 = t-D

Βmax = sin-1(R1/R2)

2. Previous approaches

Traditional analog flaw detectors measured sound path length only and could not automatically calculate reflector depth or

surface distance, or count skip legs. Live automatic displays of these additional dimensional parameters, based on

trigonometric calculations, were introduced with the development of digital instruments. However early model digital flaw

detectors calculated depth for flat test pieces only. Both with these instruments and analog flaw detectors, operators

performing circumferential testing on pipes and similar curved test pieces used graphs and nomograms such as the ones

below to calculate dimensions.

The graph at left is used to determine a correction factor k that is based on refracted angle and the ratio of wall thickness and

outside diameter. The nomogram at right is used to determine the actual reflected angle at the inside of the curved surface,

which because of the curvature is less than the refracted beam angle at the sound entry point.

Once k and the refracted angle Β have been determined, it is possible to calculate the actual leg length AB from the formula:

AB = tk cosΒ

Once the leg length is known, a reflector can be accurately placed within the first or second leg of the sound path based on the

measured sound path length. Further calculations of flaw depth and surface position must be done manually. As an alternative

to calculations, look-up tables have been published that relate these geometrical corrections to test piece diameter, wall

thickness, and inspection angles.

In the absence of software for curved surface correction, another alternative to manual calculations or look-up tables was to

empirically set up flaw detectors with the aid of a reference standard representing the tube wall in question and incorporating a

series of side drilled holes. Reflections from the multiple reference holes can be identified with respect to horizontal position

and a screen overlay can be used to mark their vertical depth and surface projected positions on the display. The resulting

screen display is horizontally non-linear, but reflector positions can be extrapolated from it by referencing the overlay.

series aw detectors

The Curved Surface Correction (CSC) software in the EPOCH series flaw detectors performs calculations automatically based

on setup information input by the user.

These calculations assume that initial probe calibration for sound velocity and zero offset have been performed as usual on an

IIW-type block or similar flat reference block. Following that calibration, the operator enters the probe angle, the thickness of

the test piece, the “X value” (the distance between the beam index point and front edge of the wedge), and the part diameter.

The EPOCH software then uses that information plus the measured sound path length to calculate and display the following,

based on the equations in Section 1.

Projected surface distance from front of probe (or beam index point if no X-value

is input) along outside of the test piece

depth of reflector

Assuming proper calibration and setup, these measurements will be as accurate as those on a flat test piece in a given setup.

The example screens below show a typical measurement of a first leg reflector in a thick wall reference sample, shown with

and without CSC correction. When the correction is applied, the flaw depth measurement is shallower (1.13” versus 1.31”) and

the surface distance or projection is farther from the probe (1.39” versus 1.07”).

CSC correction on

Additional notes:

In all tests that involve circumferential probe alignment it is very important to hold the probe normal to the surface rather

than tilting it. Tilting will skew the sound beam and effectively change the refracted angle in the test piece.

In cases where the ratio of wall thickness to diameter is large, the sound beam at a given angle may not reflect off the

ID, instead continuing straight across to the OD without a skip. (See section 1, equation 6.) In these cases CSC

calculations are not valid and the EPOCH will not report dimensional information.

4. Example measurements using EPOCH 600

First leg measurements of pipe section with 0.1” side drilled holes as shown in photograph, using EPOCH 600 flaw detector

and A543S-RM transducer with ABWM-4T-45 wedge. Diameter is 5.0”, wall thickness 0.470”. Reflectors are 0.1” diameter side

drilled holes with centerline depths of 0.160” and 0.310” from OD (1/3 and 2/3 thickness).

The SDH diameter factor causes a small offset in the reading. When establishing the physical location of the reflector within

the part it is important to measure depth and surface projection to the normal of the outer radius tangent. The measured sound

path displayed is not affected by CSC correction status. Proper calibration of zero offset and material velocity are required. In

the examples below:

Surface projection is measured from the beam index point (X Value=0)

CSC off

CSC on

CSC off

CSC on

holes.

Surface distance 1.26 1.54 1.50

CSC off

CSC on

As the diameter of a cylindrical test piece become smaller, circumferentially oriented coupling of conventional wedges

becomes progressively more challenging, due to reduced contact area and the increased possibility of rocking. For that

reason, special cylindrically contoured wedges are sometimes used on smaller diameter test pieces. As a guideline, the

International Institute of Welding recommends contouring whenever test piece radius R is less than the length of the wedge W

squared divided by four:

The SDH diameter factor causes a small offset in the reading. When establishing the physical location of the reflector within

the part it is important to measure depth and surface projection to the normal of the outer radius tangent. The measured sound

path displayed is not affected by CSC correction status. Proper calibration of zero offset and material velocity are required. In

the examples below:

R W2 / 4

ASTM standard E-164, Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Contact Examination of Weldments, calls for use of radiused wedges

whenever the part diameter is less than 20 inches or 500 mm. Olympus NDT experience suggests that this is a conservative

recommendation, especially when using small angle beam assemblies, but it is up to the user to determine applicability to

specific test.

The minimum outside diameter for which a wedge of a given size can be cylindrically contoured depends on mechanical

considerations related to wedge size and angle. The following chart lists the approximate minimum contouring diameter for

three common Panametrics-NDT wedge types.

Panametrics-NDT contoured wedges maintain a beam index point at the BIP location marked on the wedge, and the nominal

wedge angle is calculated based on beam refraction at that point. However it is important to note that cylindrical wedge

contouring affects the incident angle and thus the refracted angle from front to back across the diameter of the beam, resulting

in a range of refracted angles and effectively a defocusing and broadening of the beam in that axis.

When using contoured wedges, appropriately contoured reference blocks must also be used to calibrate zero offset and verify

beam index point and refracted angle. Conventional IIW and AWS-type reference blocks cannot be used because of the gap

between the block and the concave surface of the wedge.

boletins informativos

Instrumentos de END

Videoscópios e boroscópios

Soluções em microscopia

Analisadores por XRF e XRD

Suporte

Multimídia

- Parallel lines cut by a transversalUploaded bybartos1
- Optical-Thermal ResponseUploaded byWarhammer13
- Design of Thrust BlocksUploaded byBalaji Rao Ch
- RadioPropBasics-ebookUploaded byjit20088791
- spencer-the_study_of_sociologyUploaded byapi-27133856
- C Angles of Elevation and DepressionUploaded byKert Gloriani II
- Terangganu-Answer Physics P3-Trial SPM 2007Uploaded bykamalharmoza
- Maths 05Uploaded bydicksonhts
- ch1.psUploaded byatmroo9
- lemh205Uploaded byLokeshmohan Sharma
- Cherrynelle.docxUploaded byelka priela
- UNIT-IVUploaded bysonu modi
- Heights & DistancesUploaded bySumit Kr Jha
- LightUploaded byboltu
- Sahaj AcademyUploaded byanish_10677953
- 11_3_Angles_of_Elevation_and_Depression.pptUploaded byGurudat Boodhan
- Curvature of Plane 00 BrunUploaded byTabish Islam
- Srbl Mathemagician Level 2Uploaded bycluster2
- Geometry Demo PptUploaded byDarwin Basale
- hw week 2Uploaded byapi-369964276
- Part 04 SET (31-34)Uploaded byAmit Agrawal
- Room AcousUploaded byas
- 465-469Uploaded byPawan Chaturvedi
- Lesson Plan 12 - 6th June 2017 - IntegratedUploaded byMelissa Yeap
- Shell StructuresUploaded byAnjalySinha
- Analysis ofoptical properties in cylindrical dielectric photonic crystalUploaded bycarlozherrera
- PeltonUploaded byAnang Wf
- 33002261_K01_000_04.pdfUploaded bySubramanian V
- Curvature Scale Space Image in Shape Similarity RetrievalUploaded bymizzakee
- 7E0FFA982003082070E97F4260734B0ADEA13B9C3FFABAEDUploaded byBoyIman

- ASME Att 4Uploaded byMarciel Amorim
- proceq blocosUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- AWS A3.0.pdfUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- AWS A5.17.pdfUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- AWS A5.18.pdfUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- Duplex Welding GuidelinesUploaded byLalu Rajendran
- MIL-STD-1875Uploaded byRaja Hone
- Lavender Ultrasonic Testing of Welds Using Time of Flight DiffractionUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- AUT for Pipeline Girth Welds 2nd Edition - SampleUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- AUT for Pipeline Girth Welds 2nd Edition - Sample.pdfUploaded byHector Beaujon
- BeamTool_7_User_Manual.pdfUploaded byDjemba
- Ultrasonic Inspection of Nickel Alloys and NickelUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- Data Sheet Mseb4Uploaded byMarciel Amorim
- Scanner Cobra en 201507Uploaded byShahbaz Khan
- Wedges 1Uploaded byMarciel Amorim
- 283876292-API-1104-Welding-of-pipelines-and-related-facilities-pdf.pdfUploaded byMarciel Amorim
- SNT-TC-1A (1996).pdfUploaded bynarasimhan krishnan

- Military Missile Bases HistoryUploaded byCAP History Library
- I.5 Sison vs ANcheta GR No. L-59341 07251984.pdfUploaded bybabyclaire17
- eBay Inc Strategic ManagementUploaded bynikhilsharma5
- Penetrant TestingUploaded byBrahmaji Rao
- Amega Line data sheet finalUploaded byapi-19852580
- Cases for ADRUploaded byKarla Espinosa
- Flownex ProfileUploaded bycrazy_nm_add
- Adaptive Piezoelectric energy harvestingUploaded bySyam Mohan
- Brand ValuationUploaded byAnuth Siddharth
- Rd 1 EmbrechtsUploaded byLameune
- Stabilitation of BetalainsUploaded byKevin Mendez
- Book8 Antineoplastic DrugsUploaded byreastuty
- Pedro Santos to VsUploaded byMa Gabriellen Castor Quijada
- Surviving Mission Impossible ProjectsUploaded byadrianionescu4u
- KSKV Combine Harvester MaintenanceUploaded byMohamad Nadzri Yahaya
- Study ExcerptsUploaded byFrans Loekito
- 3331 ST7008 Prestressed Concrete QBUploaded bysundar
- A Practical Guide to Wig ModelsUploaded bydogbreath27
- Bullseye FormUploaded byMarcelo Andrade Santiago
- BOIS Getting StartedUploaded bysubhamay
- Optical TweezersUploaded byneusota
- PLAN DE GESTION DEL BUSINESS CASE.pdfUploaded byNelson Barrial Lujan
- Handbook_Public_Policy_Peters2Uploaded byBenjamín Sandoval
- Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-7-Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration-en-US.pdfUploaded byZaid Quaisar
- Cambridge Structural Database (CSD)Uploaded bykesava76
- Practical No 5Uploaded byshyam rana
- Powerpoint Presentation TemplatesUploaded bywww.gazhoo.com
- CSCS BookletUploaded byPeter Smith
- PublicationUploaded byDilhani
- Information Based Intelligent OrganizationUploaded byShan Vahora