Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pagkamahinahon
Dalas Makaramdam ng
Galit (NA)
RESULTS
Reliability
Factor structure of the Mapa
Convergent-discriminant correlations
Internal Consistency Reliability N=245
Mapa ng Loob Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino
SCALE Reliability SCALE Reliability
N1 Hina ng Loob .70 Pagkamahinahon (-) .80
N2 Pagkamaramdamin .76 Pagkamaramdamin .72
E1 Pagkamasayahin .81 Pagkamasayahin .78
E2 Pagkapalakaibigan .88 Pagkapalakaibigan .90
O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip .80 Pagkamalikhain .76
A1 Pagkadimayabang .79 Pagkamapagkumbaba .80
A3 Pagkamaunawain .77 Pagkamaunawain .79
C1 Pagkamasikap .73 Pagkamasikap .48
C3 Pagkaresponsable .80 Pagkaresponsable .68
NA Dalas Makraramdam ng .77 Pagkamahinahon (-) .80
Galit
AC Pagkamatapat .68 Pagkamatapat .69
MEAN .77 MEAN .74
PCA of the Mapa ng Loob, N=245
Validity: intercorrelation matrix
Mapa PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP
Hin Ram Say Kai Lik Baba Una Sik Res Hin* Tap
HL -.48 .35 -.36 -.25 -.42 -.22 -.23 -.23 -.14 -.48 -.13
Ram -.59 .63 -.29 -.15 -.23 -.42 -.34 -.15 -.16 -.59 -.27
Say .12 -.19 .75 .65 .25 -.10 .26 .25 -.02 .12 .03
Kai .08 -.09 .59 .83 .33 -.16 .13 .32 .08 .08 -.00
KPI .07 .02 .20 .18 .61 -.13 -.04 .23 .04 .07 .07
Dim .31 -.43 -.11 -.24 -.02 .64 .34 -.09 .05 .31 .37
Una .46 -.44 .12 .08 .15 .47 .66 .07 .11 .46 .34
Sik .10 -.04 .20 .17 .36 .15 .14 .50 .32 .10 .26
Res .18 -.07 .21 .17 .39 .16 .11 .48 .42 .18 .25
DMG -.66 .55 -.16 -.03 -.20 -.55 -.61 -.16 -.11 -.66 -.28
Tap .27 -.31 .22 .02 .12 .44 .31 .18 .20 .27 .45
Validity: intercorrelation matrix
Mapa PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP PPP
Hin Ram Say Kai Lik Baba Una Sik Res Hin* Tap
HL -.48 .35 -.36 -.25 -.42 -.22 -.23 -.23 -.14 -.48 -.13
Ram -.59 .63 -.29 -.15 -.23 -.42 -.34 -.15 -.16 -.59 -.27
Say .12 -.19 .75 .65 .25 -.10 .26 .25 -.02 .12 .03
Kai .08 -.09 .59 .83 .33 -.16 .13 .32 .08 .08 -.00
KPI .07 .02 .20 .18 .61 -.13 -.04 .23 .04 .07 .07
Dim .31 -.43 -.11 -.24 -.02 .64 .34 -.09 .05 .31 .37
Una .46 -.44 .12 .08 .15 .47 .66 .07 .11 .46 .34
Sik .10 -.04 .20 .17 .36 .15 .14 .50 .32 .10 .26
Res .18 -.07 .21 .17 .39 .16 .11 .48 ns .42 .18 .25
DMG -.66 .55 -.16 -.03 -.20 -.55 -.61 -.16 -.11 -.66 -.28
Tap .27 -.31 .22 .02 .12 .44 .31 .18 .20 .27 .45
Convergent and discriminant validity
correlations
Mapa ng Loob Panukat ng Pagkataong Validity Mean
Pilipino coefficients |discriminant
validity|
N1 Hina ng Loob Pagkamahinahon (-) -.48 .26
N2 Pagkamaramdamin Pagkamaramdamin .63 .26
E1 Pagkamasayahin Pagkamasayahin .75 .21
E2 Pagkapalakaibigan Pagkapalakaibigan .83 .20
O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip Pagkamalikhain .61 .11
A1 Pagkadimayabang Pagkamapagkumbaba .64 .22
A3 Pagkamaunawain Pagkamaunawain .66 .25
C1 Pagkamasikap Pagkamasikap .50 .19
C3 Pagkaresponsable Pagkaresponsable .42 .23
NA Dalas Makaramdam ng Pagkamahinahon (-) -.66 .29
Galit
AC Pagkamatapat Pagkamatapat .45 .23
Convergent validity correlations:
validity coefficients
Mapa ng Loob Panukat ng Pagkataong Validity coefficients
Pilipino
N1 Hina ng Loob Pagkamahinahon (-) -.48
N2 Pagkamaramdamin Pagkamaramdamin .63
E1 Pagkamasayahin Pagkamasayahin .75
E2 Pagkapalakaibigan Pagkapalakaibigan .83
O1 Kakaibang Pag-iisip Pagkamalikhain .61
A1 Pagkadimayabang Pagkamapagkumbaba .64
A3 Pagkamaunawain Pagkamaunawain .66
C1 Pagkamasikap Pagkamasikap .50
C3 Pagkaresponsable Pagkaresponsable .42
NA Dalas Makraramdam ng Pagkamahinahon (-) -.66
Galit
AC Pagkamatapat Pagkamatapat .45
Why only a moderate correlation between N1
Hina ng Loob and PPP Pagkamahinahon?
The poles of Pagkamahinahon
Pagkamahinahon
Dalas Makaramdam ng
Galit (NA)
Why only a moderate correlation between
Mapa Pagkamatapat and PPP Pagkamatapat?
Mapa Pagkamatapat = Sincerity
PPP .15
Pagkaresponsable p < .05
p < .05
Mapa
Pagkaresponsable
.26
p < .001
Summary of findings
Of eleven Mapa scales which have equivalents or
similar scales in the Panukat ng Pagkataong Pilipino,
eight have high, and three have moderate convergent
validity correlations with the PPP scales.
All convergent validity correlations are the highest
correlations for each of the eleven scales, except for
Pagkaresponsable, which is lower than the correlation
for Pagkamasikap, though not significantly.
Moreover, the means of the absolute value of the
discriminant validity correlations of each scale is
markedly lower than the convergent validity correlation.
Summary of findings
The moderate correlations are consistent with
somewhat different conceptualizations of the
corresponding traits.
In the case of Pagkaresponsable, the differing
breadth of conceptualization has not resulted in an
inferior correlation with a meaningful criterion,
namely, the care with which the participant claimed
to have answered the Mapa ng Loob in a research
setting.
Conclusion
It appears from the present study that the
constraints imposed on the development of the
Mapa scales as a five-factor inventory have not
impacted the validity of its scales negatively.
fin
Summary of findings
The moderate correlation of Pagkaresponsable with
PPP Pagkaresponsable seems due to the wider
scope of the latter, which incorporates the tendency
to work on tasks immediately, initiative, as well as
responsibility to others.
All convergent validity correlations are the highest
correlations for each of the eleven scales, except
for Pagkaresponsable, which is lower than the
correlation for Pagkamasikap, though not
significantly.
Summary of findings
The moderate correlations are consistent with
somewhat different conceptualizations of the
corresponding traits.
In the case of Pagkaresponsable, the differing
breadth of conceptualization has not resulted in an
inferior correlation with a meaningful criterion,
namely, the care with which the participant claimed
to have answered the Mapa ng Loob.