CompositesMechanicsChapter

© All Rights Reserved

0 views

CompositesMechanicsChapter

© All Rights Reserved

- MTE-2
- Linear algebra
- B.Com. Part- I
- Linear-Algebra-With-Applications-5th-edition-Otto-Bretscher Searchable.pdf
- Fp1mei Rev
- Crystallography Book
- 620001
- Engineering Mathematics Mohamed Altemaly
- 1509.00748
- Markov Excel
- P1 Matlab - Matlab in Control Systems
- STPM_Math_T1_S1_Skema_2011
- MATLAB Tutorial 2013
- BRM - MS scaling.pdf
- Math Yearly Plan f4 2012
- harold and maude
- Introductory API for Matlab
- 1999-1.pdf
- Julia Basic Commands
- ASSIGNMENT.docx

You are on page 1of 26

The classical theory of laminates uses a first-order scheme for the strains

(13.7). Next, the theory makes an additional assumption that consists of

neglecting the transverse shear effects. In this scheme, the transverse shear strains

are zero, thus:

γ xz = 0 and γ yz = 0 . (14.1)

∂w 0

ϕ x ( x, y ) = − ,

∂x

(14.2)

∂w

ϕ y ( x, y ) = − 0 .

∂y

The displacement field is then, by (13.4), written as:

∂w 0

u ( x, y, z ) = u0 ( x, y ) − z ( x, y ),

∂x

∂w 0

v ( x, y , z ) = v 0 ( x, y ) − z ( x, y ), (14.3)

∂y

w ( x, y, z ) = w 0 ( x, y ).

The deformation of the normal to the middle plane (Oxy) is then a straight

segment normal to the deformed middle plane (Subsection 13.2.3 and Figure

13.4). The deformations and the notations, used in the case of the classical

laminate theory, are illustrated in Figure 14.1.

266 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

θx θy

− zθ x − zθ y

A A

z z

M θx M θy

A H A H

M w0 M w0

z y B z x B

H H

B B

v0 u0

FIGURE 14.1. Representation of plate deformation in the case of the classical laminate

theory.

From (13.7) and taking account of Expressions (14.2), the strain field is

written:

∂u0 ∂ 2w 0

ε xx = −z ,

∂x ∂x 2

∂v0 ∂ 2w 0

ε yy = −z ,

∂y ∂y 2

ε zz = 0, (14.4)

γ yz = 0, γ xz = 0,

⎛ ∂u0 ∂v0 ⎞ ∂ 2w 0

γ xy =⎜ + ⎟ − 2z .

⎝ ∂y ∂x ⎠ ∂x∂y

14.1 Stain Field 267

⎡ε xx ε xy 0⎤

ε ( M ) = ⎢⎢ε xy ε yy 0 ⎥⎥ , (14.5)

⎢⎣ 0 0 0 ⎥⎦

⎡ε xx ⎤

⎢ ⎥

ε ( M ) = ⎢ε yy ⎥ . (14.6)

⎢ ⎥

⎣γ xy ⎦

⎡ ∂u0 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎡ε xx

0 ⎤

⎢ ∂x ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ∂v ⎥

0 0

ε m ( M ) = ⎢ε yy ⎥=⎢ ⎥, (14.7)

⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ∂y ⎥

⎢⎣γ xy ⎥⎦ ⎢ ∂u ∂v0 ⎥

0

⎢ + ⎥

⎣ ∂y ∂x ⎦

being expressed solely as functions of the displacements (u0, v0) in the plane

(Oxy) of the points of this plane;

⎡ ∂ 2w 0 ⎤

⎢ −z ⎥

f ⎤ ⎢

⎡ε xx ∂x 2 ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ∂ 2w 0 ⎥

ε f ( M ) = ⎢ε fyy ⎥ = ⎢ − z ⎥, (14.8)

⎢ f ⎥ ⎢ ∂y 2 ⎥

⎢⎣γ xy ⎥⎦ ⎢ 2 ⎥

⎢ −2 z ∂ w 0 ⎥

⎢ ∂x∂y ⎥⎦

⎣

being expressed as functions of the rotation angles of the deformed midplane and

of the z coordinate of point M. Usually, the bending and twisting strains are

expressed by the relation:

ε f ( M ) = zκ ( x, y ) , (14.9)

268 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

on introducing :

⎡ ∂ 2w 0 ⎤

⎢− ⎥

⎢ ∂x 2 ⎥

⎡ κx ⎤ ⎢

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ∂ w 0 ⎥⎥

2

κ ( x, y ) = ⎢ κ y ⎥ = − 2

. (14.10)

⎢κ xy ⎥ ⎢⎢ ∂ y ⎥

⎣ ⎦ 2 ⎥

⎢ −2 ∂ w 0 ⎥

⎢ ∂x∂y ⎥

⎣ ⎦

The matrix κ ( x, y ) is called the curvature matrix of the plate subjected to

bending and twisting.

The rotation angles of the deformed midplane at the point H(x, y, 0) are

expressed (Figure 14.1) as functions of the transverse displacement w0(x, y) at this

point by:

∂w G

θ x = 0 in the direction i ,

∂y

(14.11)

∂w 0 G

θy = in the direction j .

∂x

The displacement field (14.3) is then written:

u ( x, y, z ) = u0 ( x, y ) − zθ y ,

v ( x, y, z ) = v0 ( x, y ) − zθ x , (14.12)

w ( x, y, z ) = w 0 ( x, y ).

ε( M ) = ε m ( M ) + εf ( M ) , (14.13)

or

⎡ε xx ⎤ ⎡ε xx 0 ⎤ ⎡κx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ε yy ⎥ = ⎢ε yy ⎥ + z ⎢ κ y ⎥ , (14.14)

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣γ xy ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣γ xy ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣κ xy ⎥⎦

with

ε xx = ( x, y ), ε 0yy = ( x, y ), 0

γ xy = + ,

∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x

(14.15)

∂ 2w 0 ∂ 2w 0 ∂ 2w 0

κx = − ( x, y ), κy = − ( x, y ), κ xy = −2 ( x, y ).

∂x 2 ∂y 2 ∂x∂y

14.2 Stress Field 269

ε ( M ) = ε ( x , y , z ) = ε m ( x, y ) + z κ ( x, y ) . (14.16)

The in-plane strains εm(x, y) and curvatures κ(x, y) depend only on the coordinates

(x, y) of point H of the midplane of the laminate.

The stress field is deduced from Relation (13.12). In the case of the classical

laminate theory, we obtain for the layer k:

σ xx = Q11

′ ε xx + Q12

′ ε yy + Q16

′ γ xy ,

′ ε xx + Q22

σ yy = Q12 ′ ε yy + Q26

′ γ xy ,

σ xy = Q16

′ ε xx + Q26

′ ε yy + Q66

′ γ xy , (14.17)

σ yz = 0,

σ xz = 0.

⎡σ xx σ xy 0⎤

σ ( M ) = ⎢⎢σ xy σ yy 0 ⎥⎥ . (14.18)

⎢⎣ 0 0 0 ⎥⎦

The stress field reduces to the in-plane stresses: σxx, σyy and σxy.

Relations (14.17) show that the stresses in layer k are expressed as:

⎡σ xx ⎤ ⎡ε xx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = Q′k ⎢ε yy ⎥ , (14.19)

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣σ xy ⎦ k ⎣γ xy ⎦

with

270 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

′ Q12

⎡ Q11 ′ ′ ⎤

Q16

⎢ ⎥

Q′k = ⎢Q12

′ Q22

′ ′ ⎥

Q26

⎢Q′ Q′ ′ ⎥⎦ k

Q66

⎣ 16 26

where Q′k is the reduced stiffness matrix of the layer k introduced in (11.43) and

the components of which are expressed as functions of the engineering constants

by Relations (11.52).

On taking (14.14) into account, the stresses in the layer k are expressed as

follows:

⎡σ xx ⎤ ⎡Q11

′ Q12

′ ′ ⎤

Q16 ⎡ε xx

0 ⎤ ⎡ Q11

′ Q12

′ ′ ⎤

Q16 ⎡κx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = ⎢Q12 ′ Q22

′ ′ ⎥

Q26 ⎢ε yy ⎥ + z ⎢Q12

′ Q22

′ ′ ⎥

Q26 ⎢ κ y ⎥ , (14.20)

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

′ Q26

⎢⎣σ xy ⎥⎦ k ⎢⎣Q16 ′ ′ ⎥

Q66 ⎢⎣γ xy ⎥⎦ ′ Q26

⎢⎣Q16 ′ ′ ⎥

Q66 ⎢⎣κ xy ⎥⎦

⎦k ⎦k

or

σ k ( M ) = σ k ( x, y, z ) = Q′k ε m ( x, y ) + z Q′k κ ( x, y ) . (14.21)

The matrix σ k ( M ) represents the stress matrix in the layer k: hk–1 ≤ z ≤ hk. The

reduced stiffness matrix Q′k changes from one layer to another. From this it

results that there is a discontinuity in the in-plane stress field between successive

layers.

Expression (13.17) associated with Relation (14.20) or (14.21) leads to the

expression for the in-plane resultants, in the context of the classical laminate

theory. We obtain:

n hk

N ( x, y ) = ∑ ∫h k −1

[Q′k ε m ( x, y) + z Q′k κ ( x, y)] d z .

k =1

Whence:

n

⎡ hk hk ⎤

N ( x, y ) = ∑ ⎢Q′k ε m ( x, y )

⎢

k =1 ⎣

∫ hk −1

d z + Q′k κ ( x, y )

∫ hk −1

z dz⎥ ,

⎦⎥

or integrating through the thickness of the laminate:

⎡ n ⎤ 1⎡

n ⎤

∑

N( x, y ) = ⎢ ( hk − hk −1 ) Q′k ⎥ ε m ( x, y ) + ⎢

⎢⎣ k =1 ⎥⎦ 2 ⎢⎣ k =1 ∑( )

hk2 − hk2−1 Q′k ⎥ κ ( x, y ) .

⎥⎦

14.3 Expression of Resultants and Moments 271

The preceding expression of the matrix of the in-plane resultants can be expressed

finally in the form:

N ( x, y ) = A ε m ( x , y ) + B κ ( x , y ) , (14.22)

n

A= ∑ ( hk − hk −1 ) Q′k ,

k =1

(14.23)

n

A = ⎡⎣ Aij ⎤⎦ with Aij = ∑ ( hk − hk −1 ) ( Qij′ )k ,

k =1

and

n

1

B=

k =1

(14.24)

n

∑( )

1

B = ⎡⎣ Bij ⎤⎦ with Bij = hk2 − hk2−1 ( Qij′ ) .

2 k =1 k

The extended expression for the in-plane resultants is therefore written as:

0 ⎤

⎡ B11 B12 B16 ⎤ ⎡ κ x ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ N y ⎥ = ⎢ A12 A22 A26 ⎥ ⎢ε yy ⎥ + ⎢ B12 B22 B26 ⎥ ⎢ κ y ⎥ . (14.25)

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ N xy ⎥⎦ ⎣ A16 A26 A66 ⎥⎦ ⎢γ xy B B26 B66 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣κ xy ⎥⎦

⎣ ⎥⎦ ⎣ 16

This expression shows that, in the case of a laminate, the in-plane resultants (Nx,

0 0 0

Ny, Nxy) are not functions only of the in-plane strains ε xx , ε yy , γ xy (as in the ( )

case of homogeneous plates), but are also functions of the bending and twisting

curvatures (κx, κy, κxy).

The resultant moments are obtained by introducing Expression (14.21) for the

stresses into Expression (13.19). Hence:

n hk

M f ( x, y ) = ∑ ∫h k −1

⎡ z Q′k ε m ( x, y ) + z 2Q′k κ ( x, y ) ⎤ d z ,

⎣ ⎦

k =1

which yields:

⎡1 n 2 ⎤ 1⎡ n 3 3 ⎤

(

⎣ 2 k =1

2

′

⎦

) 3 ⎣ k =1 ⎦

(

M f ( x, y ) = ⎢ ∑ hk − hk −1 Q k ⎥ ε m ( x, y ) + ⎢ ∑ hk − hk −1 Q′k ⎥ κ ( x, y ) . )

272 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

M f ( x, y ) = B ε m ( x , y ) + D κ ( x , y ) , (14.26)

n

1

D=

k =1

(14.27)

n

∑( )

1

D = ⎡⎣ Dij ⎤⎦ with Dij = hk3 − hk3−1 ( Qij′ ) .

3 k =1 k

The extended expression of the moments can thus be written in the form:

0 ⎤

⎡ D11 D12 D16 ⎤ ⎡ κ x ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ M y ⎥ = ⎢ B12 B22 B26 ⎥ ⎢ε yy ⎥ + ⎢ D12 D22 D26 ⎥ ⎢ κ y ⎥ . (14.28)

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ M xy ⎥⎦ ⎣ B16 B26 B66 ⎥⎦ ⎢γ xy D D26 D66 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣κ xy ⎥⎦

⎣ ⎦⎥ ⎣ 16

The bending and twisting moments are therefore functions of the bending and

twisting curvatures, but are also functions of the in-plane strains.

OF A LAMINATE

The constitutive equation of a laminated plate expresses the resultants and the

moments as functions of the in-plane strains and of the curvatures. It is obtained

by regrouping Expressions (14.25) and (14.28) into a single matrix equation of the

form:

0 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ N y ⎥ ⎢ A12 A22 A26 B12 B22 B26 ⎥ ⎢ ε 0yy ⎥

⎢N ⎥ ⎢ ⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ xy ⎥ = ⎢ A16 A26 A66 B16 B26 B66 ⎥ ⎢γ xy ⎥

⎥ . (14.29)

⎢ M x ⎥ ⎢ B11 B12 B16 D11 D12 D16 κ x ⎥

⎥ ⎢

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ M y ⎥ ⎢ B12 B22 B26 D12 D22 D26 ⎥ ⎢ κ y ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ M xy ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ B16 B26 B66 D16 D26 D66 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣κ xy ⎥⎦

14.4 Mechanical Behaviour Equation of a Laminate 273

⎡ N ⎤ ⎡ A B ⎤ ⎡ε m ⎤

⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥. (14.30)

⎣⎢ M ⎦⎥ ⎣⎢ B D⎦⎥ ⎢⎣ κ ⎦⎥

(14.24) and (14.27). They can also be expressed by introducing the thickness ek

and the z coordinate zk of the middle plane of layer k, in the form:

n

Aij = ∑ (Qij′ )k ek , (14.31)

k =1

n

Bij = ∑ (Qij′ )k ek zk , (14.32)

k =1

n ⎛ 3 ⎞

e

Dij = ∑ (Qij′ )k ⎜⎜ ek zk2 + 12k ⎟⎟ .

⎝ ⎠

(14.33)

k =1

The coefficients Aij, Bij, Dij of the constitutive equation (14.29) of a laminate are

thus expressed as functions of the reduced stiffness constants of the layers. For

each layer, the reduced stiffness constants are expressed as functions of the

engineering constants from Relations (11.52) and Expressions reported in Table

11.6.

The matrix introduced in Expression (14.29) is the stiffness matrix of the lami-

nate, which describes the elastic behaviour of the laminate at point M0(x, y) =

M(x, y, 0).

Matrix A is called the in-plane stiffness matrix, D is the flexural stiffness

matrix and B is the coupling matrix between in-plane and flexural behaviours of

the laminate. This coupling is induced all the same as the materials of the layers

are homogeneous. It results from the structure in the form of layers with

mechanical characteristics which are different. The coupling matrix vanishes (B =

0), only when the laminate is symmetric (Chapter 15).

Different couplings can be observed and illustrated (Chapter 15). The coupling

between in-plane tension and in-plane shear is induced by the terms A16 and A26.

The coupling between in-plane and bending behaviours results from the terms

B11, B12 and B22, when the coupling between in-plane and twisting behaviours is

introduced by the terms B16 and B26. Lastly, the coupling between bending and

twisting results from the coefficients D16 and D26. Different types of laminates

will be considered in Chapter 15.

274 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

14.4.3 Examples

14.4.3.1 Example 1

We consider a laminate constituted of two unidirectional layers (Figure 14.2).

The lower layer has a thickness of 3 mm and is oriented at 45° from the reference

system (x, y, z) of the laminate. The upper layer is oriented at 0° and is 5 mm

thick. The unidirectional composite material of the two layers is a glass fibre-

epoxy composite with engineering constants:

EL = 46 GPa, ET = 10 GPa, GLT = 4.6 GPa, ν LT = 0.31.

EL

Q11 = = 46.982 GPa,

2 ET

1 −ν LT

EL

ET

Q22 = Q11 = 10.213 GPa,

EL

Q12 = ν LT Q22 = 3.166 GPa,

Q66 = GLT = 4.6 GPa.

Layer oriented at 0°

⎡ 46.982 3.166 0 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

Q′0° = ⎢ 3.166 10.213 0 ⎥ GPa .

⎢ 0 0 4.6 ⎥⎦

⎣

y 2 x 5 mm

1 3 mm

14.4 Mechanical Behaviour Equation of a Laminate 275

Q11

′ = ( Q11 + Q22 − 4Q66 + 2Q12 ) cos 4 45° = 11.282 GPa,

Q12

′ = ( Q11 − Q22 ) cos 4 45° = 9.192 GPa,

Q16

′ = Q11

Q22 ′ ,

′ = Q16

Q26 ′ ,

′ = ( Q11 + Q22 − 2Q12 ) cos 4 45° = 12.716 GPa.

Q66

Whence:

⎡ 20.482 11.282 9.192 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

Q′45° = ⎢11.282 20.482 9.192 ⎥ GPa .

⎢ 9.192 9.192 12.716 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

3. Matrix A

n

Aij = ∑ (Qij′ )k ek

k =1

⎣ 45° 0° ⎦

Hence:

⎡ 296.35 49.676 27.576 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

A = ⎢ 49.676 112.51 27.576 ⎥ ×106 Nm-1 .

⎢ 27.576 27.576 61.147 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

4. Matrix B

n

∑( )

1

Bij = hk2 − hk2−1 ( Qij′ )

2 k =1 k

⎣ 45° 0° ⎦

Whence:

⎡198.75 −60.87 −68.94 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

B = ⎢ −60.87 −77.01 −68.94 ⎥ × 103 N .

⎢ −68.94 −68.94 −60.87 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

276 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

5. Matrix D

n

∑( )

1

Dij = hk3 − hk3−1 ( Qij′ )

3 k =1 k

⎡ 65 ⎤

= ⎢ 21( Qij′ ) + ( Qij′ ) ⎥ ×10−9.

⎣ 45 ° 3 0° ⎦

Thus:

⎡1448.07 305.52 193.03 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

D = ⎢ 305.52 651.40 193.03 ⎥ Nm .

⎢ 193.03 193.03 366.70 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

Combining the preceding results, the constitutive equation of the laminate can

be written as :

⎡ Nx ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎢ Ny ⎥

⎢N ⎥

⎢ xy ⎥ =

⎢ Mx ⎥

⎢ ⎥

⎢My ⎥

⎢ ⎥

⎣⎢ M xy ⎦⎥

−68.94 × 103 ⎤ ⎡ ε xx ⎤

⎡ 296.35 × 106 0

49.676 × 106 27.576 × 106 198.75 × 103 −60.87 × 103

⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ 49.676 × 106 112.51× 106 27.576 × 106 −60.87 × 103 −77.01× 103 −68.94 × 103 ⎥ ⎢ε yy ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ 27.576 × 10

6

27.576 × 106 61.147 × 106 −68.94 × 103 −68.94 × 103 −60.87 × 103 ⎥ ⎢ γ xy ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ 198.75 × 10

3

−60.87 × 103 −68.94 × 103 1448.07 305.52 193.03 ⎥ ⎢ κ x ⎥

⎢ −60.87 × 103 −77.01× 10 3

−68.94 × 10 3

305.52 651.40 193.03 ⎥ ⎢ κ y ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ −68.94 × 103 −68.94 × 10 3

−60.87 × 10 3

193.03 193.03 366.70 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣κ xy ⎥⎦

14.4.3.2 Example 2

We shall now consider the laminate of Figure 14.3, constituted of four

unidirectional layers with the same properties:

EL = 38 GPa, ET = 9 GPa, GLT = 3.6 GPa, ν LT = 0.32.

The thicknesses and the orientations of the layers are reported in Figure 14.3.

This laminate is antisymmetric (Chapter 15):

— the thicknesses of the layers are symmetric,

— the orientations of the layer are antisymmetric.

14.4 Mechanical Behaviour Equation of a Laminate 277

1 mm θ = 30 ° 4

1.5 mm θ = − 15 ° 3

x

1.5 mm θ = 15 ° 2

1 mm θ = − 30 ° 1

Q22 = 9.224 GPa, Q66 = 3.6 GPa, Q26 = 0.

⎢ ⎥

Q′−30° = ⎢ 8.176 11.429 −3.418⎥ GPa .

⎢ −9.451 −3.418 8.825 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

⎢ ⎥

′ °

Q15 = ⎢ 4.693 9.473 0.699 ⎥ GPa .

⎢ 6.732 0.699 5.342 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

⎢ ⎥

Q′−15° = ⎢ 4.693 9.473 −0.699 ⎥ GPa .

⎢ −6.732 −0.699 5.342 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

278 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

⎡ 26.290 8.176 9.451⎤

⎢ ⎥

Q′30° = ⎢ 8.176 11.429 3.418⎥ GPa .

⎢ 9.451 3.418 8.825⎥

⎣ ⎦

3. Matrices A, B and D

−30 30 ⎣ 15 −15 ⎦

Whence:

⎡158.22 30.432 0 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

A = ⎢30.432 51.277 0 ⎥ ×106 Nm −1 .

⎢ 0 0 33.674 ⎥⎦

⎣

Furthermore :

Bij = 2 ⎡( Qij′ ) − ( Qij′ ) ⎤ + 1.125 ⎡( Qij′ ) − ( Qij′ ) ⎤ ,

⎣ 30 −30 ⎦ ⎣ −15 15 ⎦

Dij =

1

3

{12.25 ⎡( Qij′ ) + ( Qij′ ) ⎤ + 3.375 ⎡( Qij′ ) + ( Qij′ ) ⎤ .

⎣ 30 −30 ⎦ ⎣ 15 −15 ⎦ }

Hence the matrices B and D:

⎡ 0 0 22.659 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

B=⎢ 0 0 12.101 ⎥ × 103 N ,

⎢ 22.659 12.101 0 ⎥⎦

⎣

⎡ 293.93 77.332 0 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

D = ⎢77.332 114.65 0 ⎥ Nm .

⎢ 0 0 84.087 ⎥⎦

⎣

Combining the preceding results the stiffness matrix of the laminate is:

⎡158.22 × 106 30.432 × 106 0 0 0 22.659 × 103 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎢30.432 × 106 51.277 × 106 0 0 0 12.101× 103 ⎥

⎢ 6 3 ⎥

⎢ 0 0 33.676 × 10 22.659 × 10 12.101× 103 0 ⎥.

⎢ ⎥

⎢ 0 0 22.659 × 103 293.93 77.332 0 ⎥

⎢ 0 0 12.101× 10 3

77.332 114.65 0 ⎥

⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ 22.659 × 103 12.101× 10 3

0 0 0 84.087 ⎥⎦

14.4 Mechanical Behaviour Equation of a Laminate 279

14.4.3.3 Example 3

The effect of the stacking sequence of the layer can be illustrated by consi-

dering the laminate of Figure 14.4, obtained by reversing the layers 1 and 2,

oriented at 15° and –30° of the laminate (Figure 14.3) of the preceding example.

The elements of the matrix A are expressed as:

−30 30 ⎣ 15 −15 ⎦

of the preceding sequence [–30°/15°/–15°/30°].

The matrices B and D are easily determined. We obtain:

⎢ ⎥

B = ⎢ 5.2247 2.9342 5.9258 ⎥ × 103 N ,

⎢ −1.6154 5.9258 5.2247 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

⎢ ⎥

D = ⎢ 64.271 107.32 15.438 ⎥ Nm .

⎢60.686 15.438 71.025 ⎥

⎣ ⎦

The change of the stacking sequence of the layers keeps the in-plane matrix

unchanged, when it modifies the flexural and coupling matrices.

1 mm θ = 30 ° 4

1.5 mm θ = − 15 ° 3

x

1 mm θ = − 30 ° 2

1.5 mm θ = 15 ° 1

280 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

AND STRESSES

The constitutive equation (14.29) expresses the in-plane resultants Nx, Ny, Nxy

and the bending-twisting moments Mx, My, Mxy as functions of in-plane strains

0

ε xx , ε 0yy , γ xy

0

, and of the curvatures κx, κy, κxy. The problems of designing

structures of composite materials require the solution of the inverse problem:

knowing the in-plane resultants and the moments, find the in-plane strains and the

curvatures, and then the stresses.

Expression (14.30) can be written separating the matrix N of the resultants and

the matrix Mf of the moments:

N = A εm + B κ , (14.34)

Mf = B εm + D κ . (14.35)

From the first equation, we can solve for the in-plane strains. Thus:

ε m = A ∗ N + B∗ κ , (14.38)

M f = C∗N + D∗ κ . (14.39)

⎡ ε m ⎤ ⎡ A∗ B∗ ⎤ ⎡ N ⎤

⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥, (14.40)

⎢⎣ M f ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ C∗ ∗⎥ ⎢

D ⎦⎣ κ ⎥⎦

14.5 Determination of Strains and Stresses 281

A∗ = A −1 ,

B∗ = − A −1B,

(14.41)

∗ −1 ∗t

C = BA = −B ,

D∗ = D − B A −1B = D + B B∗ .

In the general case, the matrices A* and D* are symmetric, when the matrix B* is

not.

From Expression (14.39), we obtain:

Equations (14.42) and (14.43) can be regrouped so as to obtain the fully inverted

form of the constitutive equation of laminates. Thus:

⎡ ε m ⎤ ⎡ A′ B′ ⎤ ⎡ N ⎤

⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥, (14.44)

⎢⎣ κ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ C′ D′⎦ ⎣ M f ⎥⎦

⎥ ⎢

with

A′ = A∗ − B∗D∗−1C∗ = A∗ + B∗D∗−1B∗t ,

B′ = B∗D∗−1 ,

(14.45)

∗−1 ∗ t

C′ = −D C = B′ ,

D∗ = D∗−1.

The inverted form of the constitutive equation is written in (14.44) in a form

analogous to that of (14.30). It introduces inversions of 3 × 3 submatrices of the

direct form. The inverted stiffness matrix can also be obtained by direct inversion

of the 6 × 6 stiffness matrix in equation (14.29).

The strain field at point (x, y, z) is next determined from the in-plane strains

and curvatures considering Expression (14.14). Taking account of the assump-

tions made (first-order scheme), the in-plane strains εxx, εyy and γxy vary linearly

through the thickness of the laminate.

The strains, expressed in the material directions of the layer with orientation θ

with respect to the reference system of the laminate (Figure 11.1), are next

282 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

deduced from the general transformation relation (6.41). In the present case, the

transformation relation is restricted to the three in-plane strains. Thus, the strains

in the layer k, referred to the material directions (L, T, T') of the layer, are written

in the form:

⎡ εL ⎤ ⎡ε xx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ε T ⎥ = T ⎢ε yy ⎥ , (14.46)

⎢γ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ k ⎣γ xy ⎦

where the transformation matrix is expressed as:

⎢ ⎥

T = ⎢ sin 2 θ cos 2 θ − sin θ cos θ ⎥ . (14.47)

⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ −2sin θ cos θ 2sin θ cos θ cos 2 θ − sin 2 θ ⎥

⎦

The stresses in the layer k are next obtained using Equation (14.19) or (14.20).

For example :

⎡σ xx ⎤ ′ Q12

⎡ Q11 ′ ′ ⎤

Q16 ⎡ε xx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = ⎢Q12 ′ Q22

′ ′ ⎥

Q26 ⎢ε yy ⎥ . (14.48)

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ′ Q′ ′ ⎥⎦ k ⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣σ xy ⎥⎦ k ⎣Q16 26 Q66 ⎢⎣γ xy ⎥⎦

The stresses, expressed in the material directions of the layer, are next derived

either by using the stress transformation on the in-plane stresses σxx, σyy and σxy,

or directly from the in-plane strains εL, εT, γLT in the material directions.

By applying the transformation equation of the stresses, the expression is

obtained from the general relation (5.44). We obtain:

⎡ σL ⎤ ⎡σ xx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ σ T ⎥ = T′ ⎢σ yy ⎥ , (14.49)

⎢σ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ k ⎣σ xy ⎦ k

introducing the matrix:

⎢ ⎥

T′ = [ T(−θ )] = ⎢ sin 2 θ

t

cos 2 θ −2sin θ cos θ ⎥ . (14.50)

⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ − sin θ cos θ sin θ cos θ cos 2 θ − sin 2 θ ⎥

⎦

14.5 Determination of Strains and Stresses 283

Starting from the in-plane strains expressed in the material directions, the

stresses in the layer k are obtained as:

⎡ σL ⎤ ⎡ Q11 Q12 0 ⎤ ⎡ εL ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ σ T ⎥ = ⎢Q12 Q22 0 ⎥ ⎢ εT ⎥ . (14.51)

⎢σ ⎥ ⎢ Q66 ⎥⎦ k ⎢γ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ k ⎣ 0 0 ⎣ LT ⎦ k

14.5.5 Example

The loads applied to a structure constituted of a laminated material are such

that they reduce at a point to the in-plane resultants Nx, Ny, Nxy (Figure 14.5). We

must determine at the point under consideration:

1. the in-plane strains and the curvatures;

2. the strains in each layer referred to the reference system (x, y, z) of the

laminate, then to the material directions;

3. the stresses in each layer referred to the reference system (x, y, z) of the

laminate, then to the material directions;

in the case where the laminate is that of example 3 of Subsection 14.4.3.3 (Figure

14.4), and the values of the in-plane resultants are :

Ny

Nxy

y Nx

1 mm

x

1 mm

284 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

14.4.3.3, the constitutive equation of the laminate is written as:

⎡1000 ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎢ 500 ⎥

⎢ 250 ⎥

⎢ ⎥ × 103 =

⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ ⎥

⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ 0 ⎥⎦

⎡ 158.22 × 106 0

30.432 × 106 0

⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ 30.432 × 106 51.277 × 106 0 5.2247 × 103 2.9342 × 103 5.9258 ×103 ⎥ ⎢ε yy ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ 0 0 33.674 × 106 −1.6154 × 103 5.9258 × 103 5.2247 × 103 ⎥ ⎢ γ xy ⎥

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥.

⎢ −13.384 × 10

3

5.2247 × 103 −1.6154 × 103 327.38 64.271 60.686 ⎥ ⎢ κ x ⎥

⎢ 5.2247 × 103 2.9342 × 103 5.9258 × 103 64.271 107.32 15.438 ⎥ ⎢ κ y ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣ −1.6154 × 103 5.9258 × 103 5.2247 × 103 60.686 15.438 71.025 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣κ xy ⎥⎦

as:

⎡ ε xx

0 ⎤

⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ε yy ⎥

⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ γ xy ⎥

⎢ ⎥=

⎢ κx ⎥

⎢κ ⎥

⎢ y⎥

⎢κ xy ⎥

⎣ ⎦

⎡ 7.207 −4.322 0.069 0.415 × 103 −0.525 × 103 0.279 × 103 ⎤ ⎡ 1 ⎤

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ −4.322 22.297 0.279 −0.187 × 103 −0.042 × 103 −1.810 × 103 ⎥ ⎢ 0.5 ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎢ 0.069 0.279 30.508 1.032 × 103 −1.920 × 103 −2.730 × 103 ⎥ ⎢ 0.25⎥

⎢ ⎥ × 10−3.

3 3

⎢ 0.415 × 10 −0.187 × 10 1.032 × 10

3

4.052 × 106 −2.058 × 106 −3.065 × 106 ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ ⎥

⎢ −0.525 × 103 −0.042 × 103 −1.920 × 103 −2.058 × 106 10.747 × 106 −0.445 × 106 ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥

⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥

⎣⎢ 0.279 × 10 −1.810 × 10 −2.730 × 10 17.15 × 106 ⎦⎥ ⎢⎣ 0 ⎦⎥

3 3 3

−3.065 × 106 −0.445 × 106

0

ε xx = 5.064 ×10−3 , κ x = 0.,580,

−3

ε 0yy = 6.897 ×10 , κ y = −1.027,

0 −3

γ xy = 7.836 ×10 , κ xy = −1.309.

symmetric, as the stiffness matrix of the constitutive equation. It is the same for

14.5 Determination of Strains and Stresses 285

the submatrices A' and D'. In contrast, the submatrices C' and B' (transposed

from each other) are not symmetric.

The strains, referred to the reference system (x, y) of the laminate, are derived

from Relation (14.14) and are expressed as follows:

⎡ε xx ⎤ ⎡5.064 ⎤ ⎡ 0.580 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ −3 ⎢ ⎥

⎢ε xy ⎥ = ⎢6.897 ⎥ × 10 + ⎢ −1.027 ⎥ z .

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ −1.309 ⎥

⎣γ xy ⎦ ⎣ 7.836 ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

The variations of the in-plane strains εxx, εyy and γxy as functions of z are reported

in Figure 14.6.

The strains in each layer, referred to the material directions of the layer, are

next deduced from Relation (14.46). For the layer k of the laminate, we have:

⎡ εL ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎢ εT ⎥ = Ak + Bk z , (14.52)

⎢γ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ k

with

⎡ε xx

0 ⎤

⎡ κx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

A k = T ⎢ε 0yy ⎥ , Bk = T ⎢ κ y ⎥ , (14.53)

⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢⎣γ xy ⎥⎦ ⎣κ xy ⎦

⎡ εL ⎤ ⎡8.914 ⎤ ⎡ −0.388⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ −3 ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ε T ⎥ = ⎢3.045⎥ ×10 + ⎢ −0.058⎥ z , 1.5 mm ≤ z ≤ 2.5 mm,

⎢γ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ −2.046 ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ 30° ⎣5.505⎦ ⎣ ⎦

⎡ εL ⎤ ⎡ 2.129 ⎤ ⎡ 0.745 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ εT ⎥ = ⎢ 9.831⎥ ×10−3 + ⎢ −1.192 ⎥ z , −1 mm ≤ z ≤ 0,

⎢γ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ 0.737 ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ −30° ⎣ 2.330 ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

⎡ εL ⎤ ⎡ 7.145⎤ ⎡ 0.145 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ −3 ⎢ ⎥

⎢ ε T ⎥ = ⎢ 4.815⎥ × 10 + ⎢ −0.592 ⎥ z , −2.5 mm ≤ z ≤ −1 mm,

⎢γ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ −1.937 ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦15° ⎣ 7.702 ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

286 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

⎡ εL ⎤ ⎡3.227 ⎤ ⎡ 0.799 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ εT ⎥ = ⎢8.733 ⎥ × 10−3 + ⎢ −1.246⎥ z, 0 ≤ z ≤ 1.5 mm.

⎢γ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ −0.330⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ −15° ⎣5.869 ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

Whence the relations giving the strains εL, εT, γLT as functions of the z coordinate:

−2.5 mm ≤ z ≤ −1 mm −1 mm ≤ z ≤ 0

ε L = 7.145 ×10−3 + 0.145 z, ε L = 2.129 × 10−3 + 0.745 z ,

ε T = 4.815 ×10−3 − 0.592 z, ε T = 9.831× 10−3 − 1.191z,

γ LT = 7.702 ×10−3 − 1.936 z. γ LT = 2.330 × 10−3 + 0.737 z.

ε L = 3.227 × 10−3 + 0.799 z , ε L = 8.914 ×10−3 + 0.388 z,

ε T = 8.733 × 10−3 − 1.246 z, ε T = 3.046 ×10−3 − 0.058 z,

γ LT = 5.869 ×10−3 − 0.330 z. γ LT = 5.505 ×10−3 − 2.046 z.

The variations of the strains εL, εT, γLT through the thickness of the laminate are

reported in Figure 14.6.

The stresses in each layer, referred to the reference system (x, y) of the

laminate, are written from Relations (14.19) or (14.20) as follows:

⎡σ xx ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = A1k + B1k z , (14.54)

⎢ ⎥

⎣σ xy ⎦ k

with

⎡ε xx

0 ⎤

⎡ κx ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

A1k = Q′k ⎢ε 0yy ⎥ , B1k = Q′k ⎢ κ y ⎥ , (14.55)

⎢ 0 ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

γ

⎣⎢ xy ⎦⎥ ⎣κ xy ⎦

where the matrices Q′k are the reduced stiffness of the layers determined in

Example 2 of Subsection 14.4.3.2. From this we deduce:

14.5 Determination of Strains and Stresses 287

30°

–15°

–30°

15°

ε (× 10−3 )

ε xx 3.6 ε yy 9.5 γ xy 11.1

7.9 2.9 0.4

30° 4.4 6.9 5.3

8.3 2.96 2.4

–15°

2.1 9.8 2.3

3.2 8.7 5.9

–30° 7.0 5.4 9.6

1.4 11 1.5

15°

ε (× 10−3 )

εL 6.8 εT 6.3 γ LT 12.5

30° 194 74 –12

256 130 126

–15°

115 93 –2

158 87 4

–30°

257 102 85

96 96 11

15°

σ ( MPa )

σxx 246 σ yy 114 σxy 91

318 50 1.4

30°

193 76 19

333 52 9

–15°

112 90 8

151 97 21

–30°

289 71 35

86 106 6

15°

45 σ ( MPa )

σL 283 σT 78 σ LT

FIGURE 14.6. Stresses and strains through the thickness of the laminate.

288 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

⎡σ xx ⎤ ⎡ 263.564 ⎤ ⎡ −5522.83 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = ⎢147.009 ⎥ + ⎢ −11467.79 ⎥ z, (MPa) 1.5 mm ≤ z ≤ 2.5 mm,

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣σ xy ⎦ 30° ⎣140.579 ⎦ ⎣ −9580.17 ⎦

⎡σ xx ⎤ ⎡115.451⎤ ⎡ 19217.67 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = ⎢ 93.440 ⎥ + ⎢ −2519.78 ⎥ z, (MPa) −1 mm ≤ z ≤ 0,

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣σ xy ⎦ −30° ⎣ −2.284 ⎦ ⎣ −13520.26 ⎦

⎡σ xx ⎤ ⎡ 263.411⎤ ⎡ 6785.75 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = ⎢ 94.571 ⎥ + ⎢ −7919.24 ⎥ z , (MPa) −2.5 mm ≤ z ≤ −1 mm,

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣σ xy ⎦15° ⎣ 80.758 ⎦ ⎣ −3805.83⎦

⎡σ xx ⎤ ⎡157.918⎤ ⎡ 24407.03 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢σ yy ⎥ = ⎢ 83.622 ⎥ + ⎢ −6090.45 ⎥ z, (MPa) 0 ≤ z ≤ 1.5 mm.

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣σ xy ⎦ −15° ⎣ 2.951 ⎦ ⎣ −10176.80 ⎦

The variations of the stresses σxx, σyy and σxy through the thickness of the lami-

nate are reported in Figure 14.6.

The stresses in each layer, referred to the material directions of the layer consi-

dered, are next deduced from Relation (14.49). Hence:

⎡ σL ⎤

⎢ ⎥

⎢ σ T ⎥ = A 2k + B 2k z , (14.56)

⎢σ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ k

with

A 2 k = T′A1k , B 2 k = T′B1k , (14.57)

where T' is the transformation matrix for the stresses defined in (14.50). We

obtain :

⎡ σL ⎤ ⎡356.170 ⎤ ⎡ −15305.74 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ σ T ⎥ = ⎢ 54.402 ⎥ + ⎢ −1684.88 ⎥ z , (MPa) 1.5 mm ≤ z ≤ 2.5 mm,

⎢σ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ 30° ⎣ 19.820 ⎦ ⎣ −7364.33 ⎦

⎡ σL ⎤ ⎡111.926 ⎤ ⎡ 25492.20 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ σT ⎥ = ⎢ 96.965 ⎥ + ⎢ −8794.31⎥ z , (MPa) −1 mm ≤ z ≤ 0,

⎢σ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ −30° ⎣ 8.389 ⎦ ⎣ 2652.46 ⎦

Exercises 289

⎡ σL ⎤ ⎡ 292.480 ⎤ ⎡ 3987.79 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ σ T ⎥ = ⎢ 65.502 ⎥ + ⎢ −5031.28 ⎥ z, (MPa) −2.5 mm ≤ z ≤ −1 mm,

⎢σ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦15° ⎣ 27.728 ⎦ ⎣ −6972.19 ⎦

⎡ σL ⎤ ⎡151.466 ⎤ ⎡ 27452.49 ⎤

⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎢ σT ⎥ = ⎢ 90.074 ⎥ + ⎢ −9135.91⎥ z , (MPa) 0 ≤ z ≤ 1.5 mm.

⎢σ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥

⎣ LT ⎦ −15° ⎣ 21.130 ⎦ ⎣ −1189.00 ⎦

The variations of the stresses σL, σT and σLT through the thickness of the laminate

are reported in Figure 14.6. These variations allows us to evaluate the conditions

of first fracture in the laminate, by applying to each layer the fracture criteria

considered in Chapter 12.

EXERCICES

14.1 A [0°/30°/45°] laminate is constituted of three layers of the same thickness

e = 1 mm and of the same mechanical characteristics:

14.2 The layers considered in Exercise 14.1, of thicknesses equal to 0.5 mm, now

constitute a symmetric [0°/30°/45°]s laminate.

Calculate the new stiffness matrix. Compare it with the previous matrix.

14.3 Do Exercises 14.1 and 14.2, reversing the order of the layers: [45°/30°/0°]

and [45°/30°/0°]s . Compare the different results obtained.

14.4 Do exercises 14.1 and 14.2 again, modifying the orientation of the layers to

[0°/45°/90°].

— as inputs :

• the number n of layers,

• the moduli EL, ET, νLT GLT and the orientation of each layer;

— as output: the stiffness matrix of the laminate constituted of the n layers.

Apply this procedure to recover the results of Exercises 14.1 to 14.4.

290 Chapter 14 Classical Laminate Theory

— as inputs:

• the stiffness matrix of a given laminate,

• the in-plane resultants and the resultant moments;

— as outputs:

• the inverted stiffness matrix,

• the in-plane strains and curvatures,

• the in-plane strains in the material directions of each layer,

• the in-plane stresses in the material directions of each layer.

This procedure will be connected with the procedure implemented in the prece-

ding exercise.

Apply these procedures to the case where the laminates of Exercises 14.1 and

14.2 are subjected to the resultants and moments with values:

N x = 2.5 kN/mm, N y = 1.5 kN/mm, N xy = 1 kN/mm,

M x = 20 Nm/mm, M y = 15 Nm/mm, M xy = 10 Nm/mm.

- MTE-2Uploaded byMohit Chauhan
- Linear algebraUploaded bymydeardog
- B.Com. Part- IUploaded byhimanshubnl
- Linear-Algebra-With-Applications-5th-edition-Otto-Bretscher Searchable.pdfUploaded byAaron Olkin
- Fp1mei RevUploaded byGadisNovel
- Crystallography BookUploaded byGiovaniGonçalves
- 620001Uploaded byRajput Sunny
- Engineering Mathematics Mohamed AltemalyUploaded byMahbub Rashid
- 1509.00748Uploaded byhuevonomar05
- Markov ExcelUploaded byJorge Stiven Pico Morales
- P1 Matlab - Matlab in Control SystemsUploaded byZahidur Ovi Rahman
- STPM_Math_T1_S1_Skema_2011Uploaded byAcyl Chloride Hariprem
- MATLAB Tutorial 2013Uploaded byvinaysamm
- BRM - MS scaling.pdfUploaded byramsan1991
- Math Yearly Plan f4 2012Uploaded bySoh Tyan Jiin
- harold and maudeUploaded byapi-247628554
- Introductory API for MatlabUploaded byRaymond Wong
- 1999-1.pdfUploaded byMuhammad Al Kahfi
- Julia Basic CommandsUploaded byLazarus Pitt
- ASSIGNMENT.docxUploaded bykiranjot
- 2010_Copositive Programming_ a SurveyUploaded byOmar Abdalla
- ls+1Uploaded byAnlimi Tha
- (1)Uploaded byjojon
- lec34Uploaded byMishal Limbu
- Coupled PendulumsUploaded bySreetama Das
- Laurio Ps123longtest2Uploaded byJohn Kelly Mercado
- A Cone Compl. Lin. Alg. for Statis Output-Feedback and Related ProblemsUploaded byAnonymous DgWkoyXPA
- section 11 2Uploaded byapi-255155256
- linalgebUploaded byluser
- Matrices 2Uploaded byByungJae Kang

- Design of PVT Tolerant Bandgap Reference Circuit for Low Noise and Low CurrentUploaded byManraj Gujral
- Application of FRP Composites for Underwater Piles RepairUploaded byRiccardo Cozza
- GDJP.docUploaded bybalusapps
- The Transylvanian Basin (Romania) and its Relation to the Carpathian Fold and Thrust Belt: Insights in Gravitational Salt TectonicsUploaded byCoraKiri
- 136605456 Beam CatalogueUploaded byMinh Tuan Nguyen
- Bacteriology Tabels 2011 MedicawyUploaded byahmed yousef
- quantum dotsUploaded byVeerareddy Vippala
- Beam DeflectionsUploaded byUğur Dündar
- Time Study to Compare Different Operation Cycles Included in Manufacturing of Components with Cylindrical BoresUploaded byInnovative Research Publications
- Risk Assessment - Michaewl BaldwinUploaded byStacey Lee
- Tough and Tricky Exponents and Roots QuestionsUploaded byriad
- DatasheetUploaded byaltseletronica3666
- Debris Flow Control StructureUploaded byzahrul azha
- CI-2001_AB_OMUploaded byapi-3750211
- Developments of Morden Timber Structures - Timber in ConstructionUploaded byPapa Confi
- Sullair Lit S-Energy Ls14enUploaded byvcitorsaul79
- Active Damping of vibrationUploaded byteuku arriessa sukhairi
- ZF AVS Automatic Gearbox ManualUploaded byDaniel Ting
- 2014 Resume.pdfUploaded byRJ Lucas
- CATÁLOGO N° 11 (Ingles)Uploaded byDavid Medina
- 7 Drilling BrakeUploaded byHany Ahmed
- Tripping CurvesUploaded byNurdin Sudrajat Sasrabahu
- The Journal of Borderland Research 1964-06Uploaded byEsa Juhani Ruoho
- 34-SAMSS-624Uploaded bynaruto256
- Fun - Nerdy Pick-up LinesUploaded byDarigan194
- Alternative for Pavement ModellingUploaded byPuttapon Thongindam
- voltammetryUploaded byNandhan
- Eternal ReturnUploaded bydokumento
- LESSON PLAN Sensation and PerceptionUploaded byBrylle Deeiah
- Floating Drug Delievery SystemUploaded byOussama Salahi