1 views

Uploaded by Andresinho Sievchenko

Robust PID Controllers by Taguchi's Method

Robust PID Controllers by Taguchi's Method

© All Rights Reserved

- On-line PID Controller Design via a Single Auto-tuning Neuron
- 292-E341
- r05411005 Digital Control Systems
- Motor design PIC microcontroller
- LIM
- Plant integrator - An example of reset control overcoming limitations of linear feedback.pdf
- PID Control Basics
- Discrete Controller Design
- InTech-Modelling_and_fuzzy_control_of_an_efficient_swimming_ionic_polymer_metal_composite_actuated_robot.pdf
- 2-2-1
- A First Course in Fuzzy and Neural Control 2003 N
- ZR05120334349.pdf
- synchrocoupler
- Self-Tuning Fuzzy PID Design for BLDC Speed Control
- 3_ReportGuidelines_GET431
- Process Dynamics and Control
- Edited Proposal
- PI
- Te Series of Temperature Controller Old
- Pid Control of System Linear Control Systems Lab Report

You are on page 1of 14

John G. Vlachogiannis Ranjit K. Roy

Article information:

To cite this document:

John G. Vlachogiannis Ranjit K. Roy, (2005),"Robust PID controllers by Taguchi's method", The TQM

Magazine, Vol. 17 Iss 5 pp. 456 - 466

Permanent link to this document:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780510615951

Downloaded on: 18 March 2016, At: 01:38 (PT)

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com

The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 947 times since 2006*

Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:

M.J. Ploos van Amstel, David Farmer, (1990),"Controlling the Logistics Pipeline", The International Journal

of Logistics Management, Vol. 1 Iss 1 pp. 19-27 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09574099010804518

Robert A. Marshall, Philippe Ruiz, Christophe N. Bredillet, (2008),"Earned value management insights

using inferential statistics", International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 1 Iss 2 pp. 288-294

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17538370810866386

Jaakko Niskanen, Jussi Rouhento, Heidi Falkenbach, (2011),"European real estate equities: ownership

structure and value of the firm", Journal of European Real Estate Research, Vol. 4 Iss 2 pp. 131-144 http://

dx.doi.org/10.1108/17539261111157307

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:368933 []

For Authors

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for

Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines

are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.

About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com

Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company

manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as

providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.

Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee

on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive

preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at

www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister www.emeraldinsight.com/0954-478X.htm

17,5

Robust PID controllers by

Taguchi’s method

456

John G. Vlachogiannis

Department of Informatics and Computer Technology, Technological

Educational Institute of Lamia, Lamia, Greece, and

Ranjit K. Roy

Nutek Inc., Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of the paper is the fine-tuning of proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers

under model parameter uncertainties (noise).

Design/methodology/approach – The fine-tuning of PID controllers achieved using the Taguchi

method following the steps given: selection of the control factors of the PID with their levels;

identification of the noise factors that cause undesirable variation on the quality characteristic of

PID; design of the matrix experiment and definition of the data analysis procedure; analysis of the

data; decision regarding optimum settings of the control parameters and predictions of the

performance at optimum levels of control factors; calculation of the expected cost savings under

optimum condition; and confirmation of experimental results.

Findings – An example of the proposed method is presented and demonstrates that given certain

performance criteria, the Taguchi method can indeed provide sub-optimal values for fine PID tuning in

the presence of model parameter uncertainties (noise). The contribution of each factor to the variation of

the mean and the variability of error is also calculated. The expected cost savings for PID under

optimum condition are calculated. The confirmation experiments are conducted on a real PID controller.

Research limitations/implications – As a further research it is proposed the contiguous

fine-tuning of PID controllers under a number of a variant controllable models (noise).

Practical implications – The enhancement of PID controllers by Taguchi method is proposed with

the form of a hardware mechanism. This mechanism will be incorporated in the PID controller and

automatically regulate the PID parameters reducing the noise influence.

Originality/value – Application of Taguchi method in the scientific field of automation control.

Keywords Process control, Taguchi methods, Optimization techniques

Paper type Research paper

Introduction

Since the late 1950s Dr Genichi Taguchi introduced several new statistical tools and

concepts for quality improvement, relying heavily on the statistical theory of the design

of experiments technique introduced by Sir R.A. Fisher in 1920s in England (Barker,

1986; Box, 1988; Byrne and Taguchi, 1987; Kackar, 1985; Logothetis, 1988; Montgomery,

1997, 1999; Ross, 1996; Roy, 2001; Shoemaker et al., 1991; Taguchi, 1986). Dr Taguchi

introduced his strategy of experimental design for applications in the following areas:

The TQM Magazine

Vol. 17 No. 5, 2005

pp. 456-466 The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable suggestions given by Professor George

q Emerald Group Publishing Limited

0954-478X

P. Syrcos of the Automation Department of Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Piraeus,

DOI 10.1108/09544780510615951 Greece.

(1) designing products and processes so that they are robust to environmental Robust PID

conditions; controllers

(2) developing products and processes so that they are robust to component

variation; and

(3) minimising variation around a target value.

In his view, Dr Taguchi considers three stages in a process development (Box et al., 1988; 457

Byrne and Taguchi, 1987; Montgomery, 1997, 1999; Shoemaker et al., 1991; Taguchi, 1986):

(1) system design;

(2) parameter design; and

(3) tolerance design.

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

In system design, the engineer uses scientific and engineering principles to determine

the basic configuration. Parameter design is an investigation conducted to identify

settings that minimise (or at least reduce) the performance variation. Variation in the

performance characteristic may change with different settings. This variation

increases the product manufacturing cost, the lifetime cost and the cost due to harm

that is caused by the product to the society when the customer “uses” product/process

whose quality characteristics differ from the nominal, namely as social cost (Ferrell

and Reddivari, 1995; Ross, 1996; Roy, 2001). Tolerance design is used to specify the

best tolerances for the system parameters (Box, 1988; Box et al., 1988; Byrne and

Taguchi, 1987; Kackar, 1985; Montgomery, 1997, 1999; Ross, 1996; Shoemaker et al.,

1991).

Considerable advantages could be obtained by implementation of Taguchi’s

approach in the process of automation control. In process control today, proportional

integral derivative (PID) controllers still predominate and are sufficient for most needs

with more than 95 per cent of control loops being of the PID type. A vast amount of

literature is available that addresses the problem of PID controllers tuning (Astrom

and Hagglund, 1995; Luyben, 1990). The most important factor in all of these tuning

methods is the form of the actual transfer function of a plant. If the structure of this

transfer function is significantly different from the one used to derive the tuning

formulas, then there is a substantial amount of system unpredictability. However, this

problem is simplified when there is no structural mismatch between the actual and the

assumed transfer functions. In this case there is no structural uncertainty, but rather

the uncertainty is isolated to the actual value of the parameters used to model the plant.

If the model and the actual plant have the same structure type, then the parameters of

the transfer function become of primary concern. In a study made by Bialkowski

(1993), it was shown that 30 per cent of their control loops functioned poorly due to

incorrect PID controller settings. It is, therefore, evident that a tuning refinement in the

presence of model parameter uncertainties is of great importance.

To date, there is no research about robustness of PID controllers under noise

condition. The quality of PID controllers tuning is the result of a number of parameters.

Some of these are controllable while others are noise factors (Astrom and Hagglund,

1995; Luyben, 1990; Ziegler and Nichols, 1942).

The focus of this paper is the robustness of the PID controllers using the Taguchi’s

method. This application to PID controller’s tuning follows the basic steps listed below:

TQM (1) Selection of the control factors of the PID controllers and their alternative levels.

17,5 (2) Identification of the noise factors that cause undesirable variation on the quality

characteristic.

(3) Design of the matrix experiment (orthogonal array – OA) and definition of the

data analysis procedure.

458 (4) Analysis of the data. Response graphs are plotted to determine preferred levels

of each parameter. Also, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) table can be

generated to determine the statistical significance of the parameters.

(5) Decision regarding optimum settings of the control parameters and predictions

of the performance at optimum levels of control factors.

(6) Calculation of the expected cost savings under optimum condition.

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

The Ziegler and Nichols (1942) tuning method is based on the calculation of the

ultimate period (Pu) and ultimate gain (Ku) of the system. The pair Pu, Ku can be

calculated by letting the process loop gain increase until the system begins sustained

oscillations (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995; Luyben, 1990). This is when the poles are

located on the imaginary axis on the root locus plane or when the open loop transfer

function intersects the negative real axis on the Nyquist curve. However, this method is

difficult to automate and dangerous to implement in real situations because it has to

operate near the region of system’s instability.

An alternative method for tuning is the relay feedback method (Astrom and

Hagglund, 1995). In this method the system is forced to oscillate by introducing a

non-linear feedback of the relay type in order to generate a limit cycle oscillation in the

system. The amplitude of the system oscillations can be controlled since it is

proportional to the relay amplitude. In the PID tuning mode, when the steady state is

reached, the system oscillates at a frequency with period and amplitude close to the

ultimate period (Pu) and ultimate gain (Ku) of the open loop system.

In this study the Taguchi’s approach is applied to refine the near optimum

PID parameters, after a classical relay auto-tuning, which is used to select the optimum

parameters.

Clarifying things it is assumed that the model of process and actual plant have the

same transfer function (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995; Luyben, 1990):

K dc

GðsÞ ¼ expð2d · sÞ ð1Þ

T ·s þ 1

where, Kdc is the DC-gain of process model, d is the time delay and T is the time

constant.

The PID controller may be implemented in continuous or discrete time, in a number

of controller structures. The ideal continuous PID controller time is expressed in

Laplace form as follows (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995; Luyben, 1990):

GPID ¼ K P þ sK D þ K I =s ð2Þ

It is comprised of a proportional (KP), an integral (KI/s) and a derivative (sKD) term.

The performance index used is the integral-squared-error (ISE) and is mathematically Robust PID

defined as (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995; Luyben, 1990; Ziegler and Nichols, 1942): controllers

Z 1 Z 1

ISE ¼ eðtÞ2 dt ¼ ð yðtÞ 2 ysp Þ2 dt ð3Þ

0 0

where y(t) and ysp is the output and the desirable output of process model, respectively.

This particular performance criterion is widely used for controllers tuning because

459

its minimisation is related to minimisation of error magnitude and duration (Ziegler

and Nichols, 1942). Thus, in this study, the ISE will be taken as the quality

characteristic to be observed.

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

In the PID controllers, the KP, KI and KD parameters (equation (2)) are the control

factors since they can be changed by the conventional auto-tuner to minimise the

quality characteristic ISE (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995; Ziegler and Nichols, 1942). The

experience reveals that non-linear behaviour of the control factors of a PID can be

determined only if more than two levels are used (Day, 1986; Ziegler and Nichols, 1942).

Therefore, each control factor is analysed in three levels (Day, 1986). Also literature

reveals that between KP, KI and KD there is no significant conjunction (there is no

dependence), which effects on the quality characteristic ISE (Astrom and Hagglund,

1995; Ziegler and Nichols, 1942). So, the interaction effect of these parameters is not

considered for examination in the PID controllers. In this study, after the auto-tuning

method (Ziegler and Nichols, 1942) the initial optimum set of values is determined for

the control factors under ideal conditions, i.e. without considering any noise factor, is

K P ¼ 8; K I ¼ 45 and K D ¼ 0:47: The three levels of three control factors are identified

for study as presented in Table I. These factor levels define the experimental region,

which is also studied and presented in Table I.

Noise factors are those parameters of process model (equation (1)) that cannot be

controlled or are too expensive to control or cannot be identified. In equation (1), the

Kdc (DC-gain), d (delay time) and d/T (dimensionless factor) are generally known to be the

most uncertain factors; even small uncertainties in their values (uncontrollability) lead to

poor control (Astrom and Hagglund, 1995; Luyben, 1990; Ziegler and Nichols, 1942). In this

study, the first noise factor NF1 (DC-gain, Kdc) could be higher (up to 400) than the original

estimate of 360. The second noise factor NF2 (time delay, d ) could be higher (up to 30 s)

than the original estimate of 27 s and the third noise factor NF3 (dimensionless

controllability factor, d/T) could be higher (up to 0.1666) than the original estimate of 0.135.

Experiments

The objective now is the determination of the optimum levels of control factors so

that the PID controllers to be robust to noise factors. The robust design method

Table I.

A KP 6-10 6 8 10 PID parameters with

B KI 40-50 40 45 50 their ranges and values at

C KD 0.42-0.52 0.42 0.47 0.52 three levels

TQM (Taguchi’s method) uses OAs based on the design of experiments theory to study a

17,5 large number of decision variables with a small number of experiments (Day, 1986;

Montgomery, 1999; Taguchi and Konishi, 1987). The OA, fitting a specific case study

is selected by determining the total degree-of-freedom (DOF) for the factors included

in the study. The selected OA helps in describing the minimum number of

experiments that must be performed to reach a near optimum parameter combination.

460 One DOF is associated with the overall mean regardless of the number of control

factors. To this it is added the DOF associated with each control factor, which is

equal to one less than the number of levels. In this study, the DOF for three control

factors, in each of three levels is: ð3 2 1Þ £ 3 þ 1 ¼ 7: A three-level OA with at least

seven DOF must be selected (Day, 1986; Taguchi and Konishi, 1987). The nearest in

the seven DOF three-level OA is the OA (L9) with nine experimental runs (Day, 1986;

Taguchi and Konishi, 1987).

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

The selected OA (L9) is shown in Table II. In this array, the columns are mutually

orthogonal. That is, for any pair of columns, all combinations of factor levels occur and

they occur in an equal number of times. The next step is the development of a

procedure, simulating the variation in the quality characteristic ISE, due to the noise

factors. Taguchi (1986) also proposes OA based on simulation to evaluate the mean

and the variance of quality characteristic response resulting from variations of noise

factors. The diversity of noise factors (levels) is studied by crossing the selected OA

(L9) of control factors with an OA of noise factors (N-OA) (Barker, 1986; Box et al., 1988;

Byrne and Taguchi, 1987; Logothetis, 1988; Montgomery, 1997, 1999; Ross, 1996; Roy,

2001; Shoemaker et al., 1991; Taguchi, 1986). Thus, ISE is evaluated for each of the nine

trials against the background of four different combinations of three noise factors (two

levels at each noise factor). The ISE response was computed for each combination of

control and noise matrix experiments using the MATLAB program (version 6.1),

which simulates the above control system equations (Ziegler and Nichols, 1942). For

each combination of control factor levels, the mean and the standard deviation (std) are

shown in Table III.

It must be notified that column C in the control OA9 was left empty since there are

only three factors in this study (Byrne and Taguchi, 1987; Montgomery, 1999; Ross,

1996; Roy, 2001). Table III shows nine experiments that were carried out. In the next

section, results analysis of these experiments will identify the optimum condition,

which is the optimum mean and has minimum variation around the mean due to noise

factors.

Run A B C D

1 1 1 1 1

2 1 2 2 2

3 1 3 3 3

4 2 1 2 3

5 2 2 3 1

6 2 3 1 2

7 3 1 3 2

Table II. 8 3 2 1 3

Orthogonal array OA9 9 3 3 2 1

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

NF1 360 360 400 400

NF2 27 30 27 30

NF3 0.1666 0.135 0.135 0.1666

Trial KP KI C KD ISE (trial £ noise level) Mean Std S/N ratio

1 6 40 0.42 0.2516 0.2521 0.2099 0.2638 0.24435 0.023648 12.209351

2 6 45 0.47 0.2606 0.2649 0.2148 0.2719 0.25305 0.025922 11.901827

3 6 50 0.52 0.2696 0.2792 0.2213 0.2815 0.2629 0.028208 11.566850

4 8 40 0.52 0.1896 0.1929 0.166 0.1926 0.18527 0.012936 14.627813

5 8 45 0.42 0.2698 0.2604 0.2196 0.2836 0.25835 0.027534 11.718989

6 8 50 0.47 0.2716 0.2678 0.2197 0.2838 0.26072 0.028189 11.638437

7 10 40 0.47 0.1966 0.192 0.17 0.1998 0.1896 0.013453 14.426865

8 10 45 0.52 0.197 0.1959 0.1701 0.2002 0.1908 0.01392 14.371130

9 10 50 0.42 0.3032 0.2772 0.239 0.3186 0.2845 0.034814 10.869852

Note: C: neglected, M ¼ 0:236617

controllers

experiments

Design and results of

Robust PID

Table III.

461

TQM Analysis of experimental results

17,5 There are several approaches to this analysis. One common approach, suggested by

Taguchi’s method, involves graphing the effects and visually identifying the factors, which

appear to be significant. This technique uses a statistical measure of performance called

signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio borrowed from electrical control theory (Astrom and Hagglund,

1995; Barker, 1986; Byrne and Taguchi, 1987; Ross, 1996). Taguchi (1986) stresses the

462 importance of studying also the response variation, using the S/N ratio, resulting in

the minimisation of the quality characteristic variation, due to noise factors. The

smallest-is-best type S/N ratio will be used to analyse the results, since the objective here is

the ISE minimisation (Ross, 1996). Therefore, the S/N ratio is used for that type of response

(Astrom and Hagglund, 1995; Barker, 1986; Byrne and Taguchi, 1987; Ross, 1996):

" #

1 X n

S=N ratio ðdbÞ ¼ 210 · log · ISEi ð4Þ

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

n i¼1

where, ISEi is the response value for a trial condition repeated n times.

S/N ratios are computed in each of the trial combination and the values are

displayed in the last column of Table III. Since the experimental design is orthogonal, it

is possible to separate out the effect of each factor. Therefore the average S/N of each

level (1, 2, 3) of three control factors (KP, KI and KD) are plotted in Figure 1.

Comparing the Figure 1(a)-(c) it is shown that the line in Figure 1(b) has the largest

gradient. Thus, from Taguchi’s (1986) method it is testified that factor KI, shown in

Figure 1(b), is more prominent than other factors (Montgomery, 1997; Ross, 1996; Roy,

2001). Moreover, level 3 appears to be the best choice for factors KP and KD and level 1

for factor KI since they correspond to the largest average S/N ratio (Figure 1). In the

next sections the significance of each control factor in ISE is calculated and the

predicted ISE mean and their confidence interval (CI) are estimated.

Another common method used in statistical ANOVA (Montgomery, 1997, 1999;

Ross, 1996), indicates which factors are statistically significant and how much (in

percentage) each one affects the variance of ISE. With a view to studying the factor

significance, ANOVA using the S/N of the results is performed in Table IV.

Taking Table IV into account it is marked that KI (parameter B) significantly

affects the variability of ISE with percentage 50.79 per cent. Also the KP (parameter A)

and KD (parameter C) affect the variability of ISE with percentages 15.69 per cent

and 32.69 per cent, respectively. The influence of the error variance is calculated at

0.8097 per cent.

Utilizing the estimation model of Taguchi based on the average of factorial factors and

equivalent “b-discount factors”, a predicted optimum mean of IŜE is estimated by

equation (Logothetis, 1992; Montgomery, 1997; Ross, 1996):

^ ¼ M · bðM Þ þ ðA3 2 M Þ · bðAÞ þ ðB1 2 M Þ · bðBÞ þ ðC 3 2 M Þ · bðCÞ

ISE ð5Þ

where: M is the total average of ISE, b(A), b(B), b(C) are the b-discount factors of

factors A, B, C, respectively, and defined as (Logothetis, 1992):

Robust PID

controllers

463

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

Figure 1.

Effects of each control

factor on S/N ratio

B 8.636447 2 1098.696 50.7938

C 5.562273 2 707.6114 32.69709 Table IV.

Error 0.113979 29 0.809779 ANOVA for S/N ratio

Total 16.98748 35 100 of ISE

where, FP is the F-ratio of factor P ¼ {A3 ; B1, C3} is the best experimental condition for

controllable factors. The b(M) is the overall b-factor defined as (Logothetis, 1992):

bðM Þ ¼ 1 2 V e =SS ð7Þ

where: SS is the total sum square of trials and Ve is the variance due to error.

TQM From Tables III and IV it is shown that total SS ¼ 16:98748; M ¼ 0:236617;

V e ¼ 0:113979: As a final result, the predicted mean estimation of IŜE is 0.173774.

17,5

Estimation of predicted confidence interval

The CI for the predicted mean of IŜE in a confirmation run can be calculated using the

following equation (Logothetis, 1988; Montgomery, 1997; Ross, 1996; Roy, 2001):

464 sﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ

Fð1; a; DOFe Þ · V e

CI ¼ ð8Þ

neff

where: F(1, a, DOFe) is the F-ratio required for a ¼ risk; confidence ¼ 1 2 a; DOFe is

the degree-of-freedom of pooled error, Ve is the pooled error variance and neff is the

effective sample size (Logothetis, 1988; Montgomery, 1997; Ross, 1996; Roy, 2001):

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

N

neff ¼ P ð9Þ

1 þ ðDOFp · bðPÞÞ

p

P ¼ {A3 ; B1 ; C 3 } and b(P) is the b-discount factor (Logothetis, 1992) of control factor P.

For interval confidence of 99 per cent of predicted ISE, the next parameters are

equal with: F(1, 1 per cent, 29Þ ¼ 7:6 (tabulated in Ross (1996)), the error variance

V e ¼ 0:113979 and the effective size of samples neff ¼ 5:643176: So the CI is computed

CI ¼ 0:027671: The 99 per cent CI of the predicted optimum is:

^ 2 CIÞ # ISE

ðISE ^ # ðISE

^ þ CIÞ ) 0:1641 # ISE

^ ¼ 0:173774 # 0:20144 ð10Þ

The variability of ISE at optimum condition is estimated using the Qualitek-4 (2002)

program. In this study, the factors A-C significantly affect the variability around the

mean of IŜE. Contributions of optimum condition are shown in Table V.

The significant levels of control factors A3, B1 C3 have a total contribution of

2.7221 db. As the current grand average of performance was 12.5923 db, the expected

result at the optimum condition was estimated to be 15.3144 db. Therefore, the

expected improvement was 17.7747 per cent.

In order to calculate the expected cost savings, the Taguchi’s loss function has been

used (Ross, 1996; Roy, 2001). Savings in dollars ($) can be calculated when S/N ratio is

known. On account of the lack of the current performance status (in terms of S/N), the

cost savings in relation to the average performance loss (average S/N of all trials) can

be calculated using the next formula (Qualitek-4, 2002; Roy, 2001):

KP 10 3 0.6303

KI 45 1 1.1623

Table V.

KD 0.52 3 0.9295

Main contribution of

control factors at Notes: Total contribution from all factors ¼ 2:7221; Current grand average of

optimum condition performance ¼ 12:5923; Expected results at optimum condition ¼ 15:3144

L ¼ {1 2 10½ðS=NÞ1 2ðS=N Þ2 =10 } · 100 per cent of L1 ¼ 46:569 cents=$1 loss ð11Þ Robust PID

controllers

where L1 is the per cent loss before the experiment (S/N)1 is the average S/N

performance of all trials and (S/N)2 is the optimum performance.

This paper described a method of optimisation of PID controller’s performance following 465

the Taguchi robust design approach. In this study, the values of control factors ðK P ¼ 10;

K I ¼ 40; K D ¼ 0:52Þ in the fine-tuning of the PID controllers under noise factors were

achieved. The ISE mean was estimated at 0.174 with a std of 0.011 and S/N of 15.177. The

above optimum results are different from the initial given by Ziegler and Nichols (1942)

ðK P ¼ 8; K I ¼ 45; K D ¼ 0:47 with ISE mean of 0.226, with a std of 0.02 and S/N of 12.88).

Conclusively, the study produced a decrease of 0.052 of the ISE mean (about 23 per cent

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

more precision in control procedure) and a slight reduction in std. In the above optimum

levels of PID control factors, the mean performance of IŜE mean was estimated to be

0.173774 with a CI between 0.14610 and 0.20144. The confirmation tests at the optimum

condition resulted in an average IŜE of 0.18873, which was within the predicted CI.

Furthermore, the contribution of each factor to the variation of the mean and the variability

of ISE was also calculated. KI was elected as the most significant factor, affecting the

variability of ISE with a percentage of 50.79 per cent. Also, as the current S/N average of all

trials was 12.5923 db, the expected result at the optimum condition was estimated to be

15.3144 db. Therefore, the expected improvement in reduction of ISE was 17.7747 per cent.

The expected cost savings for PID controllers under optimum condition were calculated at

46.569 cents for every dollar of loss before the Taguchi’s experimental design.

Finally, the confirmation experiments were conducted on a real PID controller in the

Informatics and Energy Informatics (IEI) Lab of Technological Educational Institute

(TEI) of Lamia. More specifically, the optimum settings of PID parameters ðK P ¼ 10;

K I ¼ 40; K D ¼ 0:52Þ recommended by this investigation for various actual plants,

under various size of noise were tested. The average ISE of PID was found to be 0.1887,

which was within the predicted CI (equation (10)).

This paper implemented the Taguchi’s method (robust design method) in the scientific

field of automation control. Specifically, the control factors (decision variables)

affecting the performance of PID controllers under noise condition are regulated.

Regulating these values much more quality and fine-tuning of PID controllers are

achieved. As a further research it is proposed the enhancement of PID controllers by

Taguchi’s method with the form of a hardware mechanism. The novel mechanism will

be incorporated in the PID controller as shown in the diagram of Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Hardware enhancement of

PID controllers by

Taguchi’s mechanism

TQM Then, this hardware Taguchi’s mechanism will automatically regulate the PID

parameters reducing the noise influence.

17,5

References

Astrom, K.J. and Hagglund, T. (1995), PID Controllers, 2nd ed., ISA, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Barker, T.B. (1986), “Quality engineering by design: Taguchi’s philosophy”, Quality Progress,

466 Vol. 19 No. 12, pp. 33-42.

Bialkowski, W.L. (1993), “Dreams versus reality: a view from both sides of the gap, keynote

address, control systems’92”, Whistler, British Columbia, 1992, Vol. 94 No. 11.

Box, G.E.P. (1988), “Signal-to-noise ratios performance criteria and transformations”,

Technometrics, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 1-40.

Box, G.E.P., Bisgaard, S. and Fung, C.A. (1988), “An explanation and critique of Taguchi’s

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 123-31.

Byrne, D.M. and Taguchi, G. (1987), “The Taguchi approach to parameter design”, Quality

Progress, Vol. 20 No. 12, pp. 19-26.

Day, A. (1986), Orthogonal Fractional Factorial Designs, Wiley Eastern, New Delhi.

Ferrell, W. and Reddivari, V. (1995), “Higher quality products with better tuned controllers”,

Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 29 Nos 1/4, pp. 321-5.

Kackar, R.N. (1985), “Off-line quality control, parameter design and the Taguchi method”,

Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 176-209.

Logothetis, N. (1988), “The role of data transformation in the Taguchi analysis”, Quality and

Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 49-61.

Logothetis, N. (1992), Total Quality Management from Deming to Taguchi and SPC,

Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead.

Luyben, W.L. (1990), Process Modelling, Simulation and Control for Chemical Engineers,

McGraw-Hill, International Edition, New York, NY.

Montgomery, D.C. (1997), Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York,

NY.

Montgomery, D.C. (1999), “Experimental design for product and process design and

development”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society D, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 131-9.

Qualitek-4 (2002), Software for Automatic Design and Analysis of Taguchi Experiments, Nutek,

Inc., Bloomfiled Hills, MI, available at: www.rkroy.com/wp-q4w.html

Ross, P.J. (1996), Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Roy, R.K. (2001), Design of Experiments Using the Taguchi Approach: 16 Steps to Product and

Process Improvement, Wiley, New York, NY.

Shoemaker, A.C., Tsui, K.L. and Wu, C.F.J. (1991), “Economical experimentation methods for

robust design”, Technometrics, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 415-27.

Taguchi, G. (1986), Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organisation

(Distributed by American Supplier Institute Inc.), Dearborn, MI.

Taguchi, G. and Konishi, S. (1987), Orthogonal Arrays and Linear Graphs, American Supplier

Institute Inc., Dearborn, MI.

Ziegler, J.G. and Nichols, N.B. (1942), “Optimum settings for automatic controllers”, Transaction

ASME, Vol. 64, pp. 759-65.

This article has been cited by:

1. John Manuel Fernandes, Theo van NiekerkImplementation of an industrial controller for a ball-on-wheel

system 129-134. [CrossRef]

2. Matloub Hussain, Paul R. Drake, Dong Myung Lee. 2012. Quantifying the impact of a supply

chain's design parameters on the bullwhip effect using simulation and Taguchi design of experiments.

International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 42:10, 947-968. [Abstract] [Full

Text] [PDF]

3. W.J. Zhang, J.W. Li, B. ZettlClassification of design theories and methodologies for effective industrial

applications 1255-1260. [CrossRef]

4. Abdul-Wahid A. Saif, Muneeb A. AkramA Robust-Gain-Scheduled methodology for process parameter

design and control with application to a carbonated beverage filling process 1670-1674. [CrossRef]

5. B. Younes, A. Fotheringham, R. Mather. 2011. Factorial Optimisation of the Effects of Melt Spinning

Downloaded by University College London At 01:38 18 March 2016 (PT)

Processing 26, 150-163. [CrossRef]

6. Xiaoming Chen, Jili Tao, Yong Zhu, Xiaoying LiuOptimized fuzzy control for LED constant current

driver design 1124-1127. [CrossRef]

7. Božidar Bratina, Nenad Muškinja, Boris Tovornik. 2010. Design of an auto-associative neural network

by using design of experiments approach. Neural Computing and Applications 19, 207-218. [CrossRef]

8. Zhijun Sun, Huafeng Li, Weiqing HuangControl of multiple ultrasonic motors with robust parameter

design 1827-1830. [CrossRef]

9. Jiju Antony, Daniel Perry, Chengbo Wang, Maneesh Kumar. 2006. An application of Taguchi method of

experimental design for new product design and development process. Assembly Automation 26:1, 18-24.

[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

- On-line PID Controller Design via a Single Auto-tuning NeuronUploaded bydemon123abc
- 292-E341Uploaded byWajid Khattak
- r05411005 Digital Control SystemsUploaded bySRINIVASA RAO GANTA
- Motor design PIC microcontrollerUploaded byHeli Copter
- LIMUploaded bykommerapranayreddy
- Plant integrator - An example of reset control overcoming limitations of linear feedback.pdfUploaded byPaulina Marquez
- PID Control BasicsUploaded byjakkamrugved
- Discrete Controller DesignUploaded byNguyen Ngoc
- InTech-Modelling_and_fuzzy_control_of_an_efficient_swimming_ionic_polymer_metal_composite_actuated_robot.pdfUploaded byWilliam H. Coral
- 2-2-1Uploaded byVikas Patel
- A First Course in Fuzzy and Neural Control 2003 NUploaded byCesar David Arango Osorio
- ZR05120334349.pdfUploaded byAJER JOURNAL
- synchrocouplerUploaded byMandark0009
- Self-Tuning Fuzzy PID Design for BLDC Speed ControlUploaded byGRD Journals
- 3_ReportGuidelines_GET431Uploaded byIrfan Haider
- Process Dynamics and ControlUploaded bySyed Arslan Khalid
- Edited ProposalUploaded byTesfaye Meberate
- PIUploaded byUsha R
- Te Series of Temperature Controller OldUploaded byAlejandro Saravia Alcócer
- Pid Control of System Linear Control Systems Lab ReportUploaded bySyamil Rahman
- Discussion PDC.docxUploaded byMira Fazzira
- PID ControlUploaded byk
- PidUploaded byAnonymous BylYA7Tt
- DC MOTOR CONTROL BY ARMATURE CONTROL METHODUploaded byRaj Lakhwani
- I216E-EN-01+RX+PumpSequencer+UsersManual (1)Uploaded byJose Leornardo Condori
- h 374047Uploaded byInternational Journal of Research in Engineering and Science
- 3203949 . Robust Decentralized Controller Design via Ai to Enhance Power System Dynamic PerformanceUploaded byrahuljacob
- Data Rita TekananUploaded byRita
- Development of an Automatic Arc Welding System Using SMAW ProcessUploaded byAnonymous g80PbBY73
- ATC770 ManualUploaded byEduardo Huayta

- My SuffixesUploaded byMurphy Anderson
- Both Either Neither None 2Uploaded byAndresinho Sievchenko
- DUM Articles - PresentationUploaded byAndresinho Sievchenko
- Okali TraditionsUploaded byAndresinho Sievchenko
- Countable and Uncountable NounsUploaded byAndresinho Sievchenko
- Sense of Identity 2Uploaded byAndresinho Sievchenko
- Sense of IdentityUploaded byAndresinho Sievchenko
- Sandvik - Technical Guide -Materials ISOUploaded byznovak77
- Bandas Skf CatalogoUploaded byAndresinho Sievchenko
- Microchip 18F877 DatasheetUploaded byberety

- MG5595 Coursework Brief BBL 2016.17Uploaded byIsaiah Ogutu
- TomateUploaded byleonorgcl9362
- Policy Analysis and AdvocacyUploaded byWajahat Ghafoor
- Financial Goal SettingUploaded bymahesh19689
- The Manhattan Pair Distance Heuristic for the 15-PuzzleUploaded byhahaggerg
- Use the BOPPPS Model to Develop a Lesson Plan Effective (1)Uploaded byPháp Văn
- Accenture Process and Innovation Performance Solving Retail Problems Using Lean Six SigmaUploaded byYash Verma
- Pharmaceutical CGMPs for the 21st CenturyUploaded byMabel Ureta Concepcion
- LE GALÈS; VITALE (2013) Governing the large metropolis.pdfUploaded byheraldoferreira
- ENG 3 - Academic Writing SkillsUploaded byMadeline Sibulo
- Review of Art and Cognition IntegratingUploaded byMESTRESIDINEY
- -01-THEDYNAMICSOFPEOPLEANDORGANIZATIONSUploaded byIshwari Peswani
- Seismic Behaviour of Infilled Frame Structures with and Without Shear WallUploaded byIRJET Journal
- Anticipating the Evolutions and Outcomes of Alliances Between RivalsUploaded byPankaj Khatoniar
- w375Uploaded byDhani Amalia
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ed4343.001.10f taught by Emily Hennessy (eft031000)Uploaded byUT Dallas Provost's Technology Group
- Screening of Breast Cancer Based on AgeUploaded byInternational Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
- QUIAMBAO_VJr_Chap5Uploaded byVicJr Quiambao
- Raising the Red Flag on Some Energy DrinksUploaded byNSF International
- Eac Pca Manual _2Uploaded byDaris Purnomo Jati
- Genos EI Concise SelfUploaded byKarolina Kalisz
- MikaUploaded byMurnizahayati Aripin
- 2016 IPDM - Frugal InnovationUploaded byItiel Moraes
- Assembly Line BalancingUploaded byHarshad_S
- English as a Business Lingua FrancaUploaded byMarc
- Human Factor in Functional SafetyUploaded bySteve Carvalho
- Towards a Framework for E-Commerce UsabilityUploaded byJohn Smith
- Supervisor Performance AppraisalUploaded byHarry olardo
- 1-s2.0-S1359431109001501-main.pdfUploaded byMoeenulHaque
- Research Methadology reshinUploaded byMuhammad Aslam C