1 views

Original Title: Fission and Fusion

Uploaded by Alexandra Veres

Fission and Fusion

This is about fission.

© All Rights Reserved

- Introduction to Fission and Fusion.ppt
- Monograph
- APES Chp 2 Science
- 601 Notes All
- Uranium-235
- jhseany
- 05p280-2-weapons
- Decay Fission Fusion
- 2002UNIT2PAPER2
- Short Notes
- Nuclear-Energy-Selected-Entries-from-the-Encyclopedia-of-Sustainability-Science-and-Technology.pdf
- Nuclear Decay Question
- Nuclear Physics & Electron Ball as Tics
- SBG Nuclear Reactions- Direct & CNR, Fission & Fusion, Reactor
- Mit22 251f09 Origen
- Chapter 21.3 Energy Fission and Fusion
- UNIT-II
- nuclear decay question.docx
- 7887 2008-06 MS
- 04 Reactors and Fuels

You are on page 1of 9

Dr Emily Nurse

2017

As you have learnt in the module on “Nuclear Phenomenology”, the nucleons in nuclei are bound together

with an attractive force (the nuclear strong force), therefore it takes energy to split the nucleus up into

individual nucleons. This energy is known as the binding energy of the nucleus. Since the energy of the

bound nucleus plus the binding energy is equal to the energy of the individual nucleons, the total energy of

the nucleus is the energy of the free nucleons minus the binding energy. And since mass is equal to energy

(times c2 ) we say that the mass of a nucleus is smaller than the mass of the individual nucleons, and the

di↵erence in mass is due to the negative binding energy.

The basic principle behind nuclear fission and fusion is to take advantage of the di↵erence in the binding

energy per nucleon between nuclei with di↵erent nucleon numbers. This is seen in Figure 1, which shows that

the binding energy per nucleon versus the nucleon number increases rapidly for the lowest nucleon numbers

(with some spikes seen for magic nuclei), reaches a maximum at 56 Fe , then slowly decreases again. It can

be seen that splitting one of the heaviest nuclei into two lighter nuclei results in a larger total binding energy,

and since this energy is negative it results in a smaller total energy (or mass). The leftover energy can then be

released as kinetic energy, which can be utilised, essentially unlocking some of the energy inside the nucleus.

This is the basic principle behind nuclear fission. It is also clear that if two of the lightest nuclei can be fused

together to form a heavier nucleus, the total (negative) binding energy will be larger and hence the total

energy will be smaller, releasing some kinetic energy. This is the basic principle behind nuclear fusion.

2 Fission

2.1 Basics

For a nucleon number larger than 100 it can be energetically favourable for massive nuclei to split into lighter

daughter nuclei, with the extra energy carried o↵ as kinetic energy of the fission products. An example is:

235

92

U ! 92

37

Rb + 140

55

Cs + 3n + X MeV, (1)

although it should be noted that this is not the only fission process that 235 92

U undergoes. The decay

products of fission will themselves decay, for example via -decay and the resulting nuclei will often give o↵

additional neutrons. These neutrons are known as delayed neutrons as they will be released much later than

the prompt neutrons of Equation 1. We will see in Section 2.4 that these delayed neutrons are vital for the

safe running of nuclear fission reactors.

1

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

Let us breakdown the energy released using the Semi-Empirical Mass Formula (SEMF). The di↵erence in

binding energies between the initial and final states is given by the di↵erence in energies for each correction

term of the SEMF.1 We will now go through each correction term in turn (although we ignore the very small

pairing term):

1. Volume term: av (AU ARb ACs ) = 46.7 MeV

⇣ ⌘

2/3 2/3 2/3

2. Surface term: +as AU ARb ACs = 160 MeV

✓ ◆

2 2 2

ZU ZRb ZCs

3. Coulomb term: +ac 1/3 1/3 1/3 = +339 MeV

AU ARb ACs

⇣ ⌘

(ZU AU /2)2 (ZRb ARb /2)2 (ZCs ACs /2)2

4. Asymmetry term: +aa AU ARb ACs = +26.1 MeV

where we have used av = 15.56, as = 17.23, ac = 0.697 and aa = 93.14. So the total di↵erence in energy

released at this stage is 158 MeV. In fact the daughter nuclei also release some energy, due to the subsequent

decays discussed above, so the total energy released is actually ⇡ 200 MeV per fission.

1 The total number of nucleons is the same before and after the decay, so it is only the correction terms we need to consider.

2

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

Spontaneous fission is when the fission process occurs without external action. In the SEMF we have assumed

that the nucleus is spherical, because this minimises the surface area and hence the energy from the surface

term. If we imagine the process of fission starting with the deformation of a spherical nucleus into a prolate

shape, leading to the eventual splitting into two nuclei, then it is important to consider how the binding

energy changes as the nucleus deforms. As the nucleus stretches into a prolate shape, the surface term will

increase and the Coulomb term will decrease (assuming the volume remains the same). If the change in

Coulomb term is larger than the change in the surface term then the deformed shape will be energetically

favourable and the nucleus is unstable, meaning that spontaneous fission can occur. It turns out that this is

2

2as

only the case for ZA ac ⇡ 49, which is only the case for very heavy nuclei with Z > 116 and A 270.

Fission can also occur in lighter nuclei, but this requires penetrating a potential barrier. Since the energy

of the nucleus increases as it deforms (but then decreases again once it has split) there is a barrier that must

2

be overcome. This is shown in Figure 2, which shows as a solid line the energy of a nucleus with ZA < 2a ac .

s

It can be seen that the energy increases as the nucleus deforms then falls o↵ again as it splits (note also the

dashed line, which shows the energy decreasing through the process in the case of the very heavy unstable

2

2as

nuclei with ZA ac ). The di↵erence in the energies for the spherical nucleus and the maximum of the

curve is known as the activation energy (or fission barrier), which is required in order to induce fission.

Spontaneous fission can occur in this case via a quantum mechanical tunnelling through the barrier, however

the probability is extremely small. For example for 238 92

U the transition rate for spontaneous fission is

3 ⇥ 10 24 s 1 compared to about 5 ⇥ 10 18 s 1 for ↵ decay.

Another possibility is to supply the energy needed to overcome the barrier. This is known as induced

fission and is achieved by supplying a flow of neutrons. Since neutrons are electrically neutral they can

approach the nuclei and be attracted by the strong nuclear force. For heavy nuclei, such as uranium, the

activation energy is only about 6 MeV. This energy can be supplied with a flow of low energy neutrons that

induce neutron capture reactions. They push the nucleus into an excited state above the fission barrier and

it then splits up. When a nucleus absorbs a neutron some energy is released due to the binding energy of

that neutron, if this energy is as large as the activation energy then fission can be induced. The binding

energy of the last added neutron is not the same as the average binding energy per nucleon (this is explained

by the shell model). For uranium it is a little less, and it depends on how adding another neutron a↵ects the

3

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

U (which leads to 236 92

U ) converts an even-odd

nucleus to a more tightly bound even-even nucleus due to the larger pairing term. Conversely, the capture of

a neutron by 23892

U (which leads to 23992

U ) converts an even–even nucleus to a less tightly bound even–odd

one. The binding energy of the last neutron is 6.5 MeV for 236 92

U and 4.8 MeV for 239 92

U (the di↵erence

between them is due to the di↵erence in the change in the pairing term). The activation energy for fission in

235

92

U is 5 MeV (less than the energy supplied by neutron capture) and that in 238 92

U is 6 MeV (more than

the energy supplied by neutron capture). For this reason fission can be induced in 235 92

U by slow neutrons,

in fact the kinetic energy of the neutrons can be zero as a neutron capture will always provide enough energy

to induce fission. Conversely, for fission to be induced in 238 92

U neutrons with at least 1.2 MeV of kinetic

energy (fast neutrons) are required. Materials such as 23592

U that require only slow neutrons to induce fission

are known as fissile materials, other examples include 233 92

U , 239

94

Pu and 24194

Pu . Materials such as 23892

U

232

that require fast neutrons to induce fission are known as non-fissile materials. Other examples include 90 Th

, 240

94

Pu and 24294

Pu .

Since neutrons are used to induce fission it is useful to look at the nucleus–neutron cross section for uranium,

the most commonly used element in fission reactors. Figure 3 shows the total and fission nucleus–neutron

cross sections for 235 92

U and for 238 92

U . The total cross section includes contributions from elastic and

inelastic scattering, and from neutron absorption. If the neutron is absorbed an excited state is formed that

will either emit one or more particles, e.g. neutrons, protons, ↵ particles; de-excite by emitting photons;

or undergo fission. There are resonant regions in the neutron absorption cross section where the compound

nucleus produced after the neutron absorption is in a region of excitation where its energy levels are well

separated.

There are a number of things to note about Figure 3. Firstly we can see that the fission cross section for

238

92

U is only relevant if the neutron has a kinetic energy above the activation energy of 1.2 MeV, whereas

for fissile 235

92

U the fission cross section is largest for small energy neutrons. In fact the fission cross section

is 84% of the total cross section at 0.1 eV. For 238 92

U the total cross section is dominated by elastic and

inelastic scattering and shows little dependence on energy except in the resonant region between 1 eV and

1 keV, where is becomes likely that a neutron will be captured into a resonance with radiative decay of the

excited state.

For 23592

U the total cross section at low energies is dominated by fission, with a sizeable contribution from

radiative capture of the neutron with the formation of the excited state 236 92

U plus one or more photons.

There is a clear resonance region, where in this case the resonance will decay via fission. At higher energies

the total cross section is dominated by elastic scattering and inelastic excitation of the nucleus.

We have seen that neutrons can induce fission and also that fission produces neutrons. This leads to the idea

of a chain reaction in which one fission reaction leads to one or more fission reactions due to the produced

neutrons. If the probability that a given neutron induces fission is q and each fission reaction produces an

average of n neutrons, then each neutron will lead to (nq 1) additional neutrons in a time tp , where tp is the

average time before absorption of the neutron occurs. If there are N (t) neutrons present at time t, then at

N (t+ t) N (t)

time t+ t there will be N (t)+N (t) (nq 1) t/tp neutrons present and therefore dN dt = limt!0 =

dN (nq 1)dt R N (t) dN

R tt (nq 1)dt

N (t) (nq 1) /tp giving N (t) = tp . Integrating between t = 0 and t = t gives: N (0) N (t) = 0 tp

4

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

(a) (b)

Figure 3: Nucleus–neutron cross sections versus the neutron kinetic energy for (a) uranium-235 and (b)

uranium-238.

(nq 1)t

giving ln [N (t)] ln [N (0)] = tp leading to:

. (2)

This leads to three possible scenarios, depending on the exact value of nq:

1. For nq < 1, N (t) decreases exponentially, the process is said to be subcritical and the reactions will

soon die out.

2. For nq = 1, N (t) remains constant, the process is said to be critical and the conditions are right for a

sustained, controlled reaction as is required in a nuclear power plant.

3. For nq > 1, N (t) increases exponentially and the process is said to be supercritical. The energy will

grow very rapidly, leading to an explosion, exactly what is needed in a nuclear fission bomb.

Before starting this section I would like to note that the topic of nuclear fission bombs is obviously extremely

sensitive. They have had devastating e↵ects on peoples lives and the teaching of the topic in no way condones

their use, it is simply here to demonstrate how nuclear fission has been utilised and show the physics behind

the weapons.

First we consider the conditions required to create a supercritical reaction. For simplicity we consider

pure 23592

U , which has an average n ⇡ 2.5 and tp ⇡ 10 8 seconds (note that the process in Equation 1

is only one way that fission can occur). For supercritical conditions we require q > 0.4. One of the key

determining factors in the design of a bomb is the size of the metal. If it is small enough that neutrons are

likely to reach the edge of the volume before tp , then the reaction will die out. A neutron with 2 MeV kinetic

energy (which is the average energy of a neutron coming from fission) will move approximately 20 cm in a

straight line in 10 8 seconds. Due to the relatively small kinetic energy compared to the neutron rest mass

(mn = 939.57 MeV/c2 ) we can estimate this using the classical expression for kinetic energy: 12 mn v 2 , so that

2

we have: 2 MeV = 12 ⇥ 939.57 MeV/c2 ⇥ v 2 giving: 0.0043 = vc2 which gives v = 2 ⇥ 107 ms 1 and hence

5

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

the distance travelled is 20 cm. However, the neutron will not travel in a stright line because an average of

6 collisions is expected before inducing fission, and if we assume that the direction of the neutron changes

randomly after each collision, the average distance travelled is actaully 7 cm. However, not all these neutrons

will induce fission, as some will escape the material and some will be captured in nuclei without inducing

fission. This means that a larger sphere is required and it turns out that a radius of 9 cm, corresponding to

a critical mass of 50 kg, is required to ensure a supercritical reaction. A bomb is usually made by starting

with a subcritical mass of material then using a mechanism to increase its size when the bomb is to go o↵.

In order to produce power from nuclear fission, a critical reaction is required, with nq = 1. As we will see,

any small deviations above unity would lead to a huge increase in the power output in a very short time.

We will consider a thermal reactor, which uses uranium as the fuel and low-energy neutrons to establish

a chain reaction. Natural uranium contains only 0.7% 235 92

U and 99.3% 238 92

U , so a neutron is much more

238

likely to interact with a nucleus of 92 U . A 2 MeV neutron has little chance of inducing fission in natural

uranium. It is more likely to scatter inelastically with a 23892

U nucleus, losing energy in the process (see

Figure 3(b)). After a couple of such interactions the neutron energy will be below the threshold of 1.2 MeV

for inducing fission in 238

92

U . Such a neutron is much more likely to be captured into one of the 238 92

U

resonances, with the emission of photons, before inducing fission in one of the rare 23592

U nuclei. There are

two possible ways to ensure a critical reaction in uranium:

235

1. Enrich the uranium so that it contains 2-3% 92

U , making it more likely that a neutron will induce

fission in a 235

92

U nucleus.

2. Surround the natural uranium fuel in a large volume of moderator material, which has the job of slowing

down the fast neutrons produced in fission via elastic collisions. The slow neutrons are not energetic

enough to be absorbed into a 238

92

U resonance. It will therefore be more likely to eventually meet and

induce fission in a 235

92

U nucleus, the cross section for which is high at low energies (see Figure 3).

Usually heavy water (D2 O) or graphite are used as moderator materials.

Vital to the safe running of a nuclear fission reactor is that it operates with precisely nq = 1. This is

achieved with control rods that are mechanically inserted into the reactor whenever the reaction needs to be

reduced (and removed if the reaction needs to be increased). They are usually made of cadmium, which has

a very high absorption cross section for neutrons. The problem with this mechanism is that tiny increases to

nq, from e.g. fluctuating temperatures, would very rapidly lead to an explosive reaction. In order to see this

we consider Equation 2. Typically tp ⇡ 10 3 seconds in natural uranium (note it is much longer than the

equivalent time in pure 23592

U due to the smaller cross sections), so for a modest 0.1% increase in nq such

that nq = 1.001, the reactor flux would increase by e60 ⇡ 1026 in only one minute, which is clearly a highly

unstable system. Mechanical insertion of the control rods is not possible on the timescales required to control

such rapid increases in flux. It is therefore necessary to have a much smaller rate of increase in a safe nuclear

reactor. The key to this is to consider the a↵ect of delayed neutrons, which appear on average ⇡ 13 seconds

after the fission. These delayed neutrons come from the fission of decay products that have undergone a

series of decays. Taking account of delayed neutrons we need to replace nq with (nprompt + ndelayed ), where

nprompt is the number of prompt neutrons per fission and ndelayed is the number of delayed neutrons per

fission. To ensure that reactions remain constant we have the requirement (nprompt + ndelayed ) q = 1, where

ndelayed ⇡ 0.02, giving a roughly 1% correction to nprompt . The idea is to keep nprompt q far enough below 1

6

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

that small variations in q cannot lead to an unstable system. However (nprompt + ndelayed ) q is kept very close

to 1, and it is the time scale of the delayed neutrons (⇡ 13 seconds) that dictate the growth of the neutron

flux in the event of a deviation from criticality. These timescales are manageable for mechanical control of

the reactor via the insertion of neutron absorbing control rods.

3 Fusion

3.1 Basics

Fusion is the opposite process to fission, where two very light nuclei fuse to form a heavier nucleus, releasing

energy due to the fact that the (negative) binding energy per nucleon is larger for the fused nucleus. The

energy released in fusion is less than that in fission, but the light nuclei are much more abundant in nature,

making it an attractive potential for power generation.

The practical problem with fusion comes from the fact that two positively electrically charged nuclei will

repel each other due to the Coulomb repulsion, stopping them getting close enough for the strong nuclear

force to take over allowing them to fuse. The Coulomb potential between two nuclei gives the amount of

energy required to overcome this Coulomb barrier and is given by:

0

1 ZZ e2

VC = ,

4⇡✏0 R + R0

0 0 1

where Z and Z are the two atomic numbers and R and R are their e↵ective radii. If we take R = 1.2A 3 fm

(from the “Nuclear Phenomenology” module) then we obtain:

0 0

e2 h̄cZZ ZZ

VC = h i = 1.198 h i MeV,

4⇡✏0 h̄c 1.2 A1/3 + (A )

0 1/3

fm A1/3 + (A0 )

1/3

2

where we have used ↵ = 4⇡✏e0 h̄c = 137

1

and h̄c = 0.197 GeV fm (see the “Basic Ideas in Particle Physics”

0 0

notes). For simplicity we set A ⇡ A ⇡ 2Z ⇡ 2Z , then VC ⇡ 0.15A5/3 MeV and for A ⇡ 8, VC ⇡ 4.8 MeV.

This would be the amount of energy required to overcome the Coulomb barrier, and would be smaller for

lighter nuclei.

In order to overcome this barrier a confined mixture of nuclei can be heated enough that the kinetic

energy supplies the required energy. Using the relationship between particle energy and temperature in a

medium, E = kB T , with Boltzmann’s constant kB = 8.6 ⇥ 10 5 eV K 1 , we obtain T ⇡ 5.610 K for a particle

energy of 4.8 MeV. This is a very high temperature! Actually, fusion will occur at lower temperatures than

this for two reasons:

1. Quantum tunnelling: similar to ↵-decay, discussed in the “Nuclear Phenomenology” module, the prob-

G

ability to penetrate an

penergy barrier via quantum tunnelling is e , where G is the energy dependent

Gamow factor: G = EG /E, where EG increases as the barrier increases and E is the energy of the

particles.

2. A collection of nuclei with a given mean energy will have a Maxwellian distribution of energies about

the mean and the distribution of the energies will have the form e E/kB T .

7

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

So the e↵ect from quantum mechanical tunnelling increases with energy and that from the energy distribution

of the particles decreases with energies. When these two e↵ects are combined we end up with a reaction rate

that peaks at a certain energy and there is a small range of energies within which fusion takes place at a

non-negligible rate (see the lecture slides for a distribution of the reaction rate versus energy).

The energy of the sun comes from nuclear fusion reactions, and mostly from the proton–proton chain. The

temperature of the sun is 107 K and all the material is fully ionised and is referred to as a plasma. The

nuclei of hydrogen atoms (which are just protons) are the starting point for the process, which has the three

following steps:

1. Two hydrogen nuclei (protons) fuse to form a deuterium nucleus:

1

1

H + 11 H ! 21 H + e+ + ⌫e + 0.42 MeV.

1

2. The deuterium fuses with more hydrogen to produce helium and a photon: 1

H + 21 H ! 32 He + +

5.49 MeV.

3. Two helium nuclei (from the above two steps occuring twice) fuse to form an ↵ particle plus some extra

hydrogen nuclei: 32 He + 32 He ! 42 He + 11 H + 11 H + 12.86 MeV.

In each step the energy released is the di↵erence in binding energies between the initial and final states. The

relevant binding energies are: B 21 H = 2.224 MeV, B 32 He = 7.718 MeV and B 42 He = 28.3 MeV. For

the first step the di↵erences in the masses of the particles in the initial and final states must also be taken

into account: me+ = 0.511MeV/c2 , mn = 939.566 MeV/c2 and mp = 938.272 MeV/c2 . You can convince

yourselves that accounting for these gives the energy di↵erences seen above. The extra energy is in the kinetic

energy of the particles. The first step is slow as it involves the weak interaction and it therefore sets the

scale for the long lifetime of the sun. For a complete chain the first two steps occur twice providing the two

helium nuclei for the third step. The total energy released is: 2 ⇥ (0.42 + 5.49) + 12.86 = 24.68 MeV and the

overall interction is given by:

4 1

1

H ! 42 He + 2e+ + 2⌫e + 2 + 24.68 MeV.

The produced positrons will annhilate with electrons in the plasma providing an extra 1.02 MeV of energy

per positron so the total energy is 26.72 MeV. However, each neutrino will carry o↵ an average of 0.26 MeV of

energy, which will be lost in space. The rest of the energy is transported to the surface of the sun and emitted

as photons or ejected high-energy particles. The total energy radidated from the sun from the proton–proton

chain is therefore 6.55 MeV per proton. The proton–proton chain is the dominate fusion process powering

the sun, but other processes involving the fusion of heavier nuclei also occur producing additional energy and

changing the composition of elements in the sun to include the heavier elements.

Due to the abundance of light nuclei the idea of utilising the energy from fusion as a source of power is

a very attractive one. The proton–proton interactions that power the sun are very slow (due to the weak

interaction) so cannot be used. Possible candidates for fusion reactor processes are deuterium–deuterium

fusion and tritium–dueterium fusion. The former proceeds via: 21 H + 21 H ! 32 He + n + 3.27 MeV or 21 H + 21 H !

3

1

H + p + 4.03 MeV and the latter via: 21 H + 31 H ! 42 He + n + 17.62 MeV, which gives o↵ more energy and also

8

PHAS3224: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2017

has the advantage of having a larger cross section than deuterium–deuterium fusion. In all these reactions the

energy produced comes from the di↵erence in binding energies before and after the reaction. The problem

with tritium–deuterium fusion is the low abundance of natural tritium, which has a half-life of only 17.7

years. By contrast deuterium is found in huge quantities in sea water.

Nonetheless, due to its advantages, tritium–deuterium fusion is considered as a candidate for fusion reac-

tors. The cross section for this process is reasonable when the nuclei have an energy of 20 keV, corresponding

2⇥104

to a temperature of T = kEB = 8.6⇥10 5 = 2 ⇥ 10

8

K. The main problem with practical fusion is how to

contain plasmas at such high temperatures. Any material container would vaporize at these temperatures.

The solution is to contain the plasma using either:

1. magnetic confinement where the charged particles in the plasma follow a helix path as they curve

round a magnetic field with a direction that points in a circle around a donut shape or

2. intertial confinement where pulsed lasers bombard small pellets of a tritium–deuterium mixture in

many directions at the same time at very high energies.

Fusion research aims to try and make the ratio of energy output to energy input (required to reach such high

temperatures) greater than one so that fusion is feasible for a source of power. This is known as the Lawson

criteria. This ratio is larger for longer confinement times and higher particle densities. A value greater than

one has not yet been reached but research is still ongoing.

- Introduction to Fission and Fusion.pptUploaded byZubair Hassan
- MonographUploaded byAnumakonda Jagadeesh
- APES Chp 2 ScienceUploaded byAPES2000
- 601 Notes AllUploaded byJack Cavaluzzi
- Uranium-235Uploaded byMaxim Šporki
- jhseanyUploaded byjhseany
- 05p280-2-weaponsUploaded byMuhammad Jahanzaib
- Decay Fission FusionUploaded bymamun31127088
- 2002UNIT2PAPER2Uploaded bypetey78
- Short NotesUploaded byHaseen Ullah
- Nuclear-Energy-Selected-Entries-from-the-Encyclopedia-of-Sustainability-Science-and-Technology.pdfUploaded byibrahim12345
- Nuclear Decay QuestionUploaded byDhanBahadur
- Nuclear Physics & Electron Ball as TicsUploaded byprateekjuly23
- SBG Nuclear Reactions- Direct & CNR, Fission & Fusion, ReactorUploaded bySowgata Chowdhury
- Mit22 251f09 OrigenUploaded bygokonk
- Chapter 21.3 Energy Fission and FusionUploaded bySandile SynthaxError Mabika
- UNIT-IIUploaded bySatheshkumar Dhamotharan
- nuclear decay question.docxUploaded byDhanBahadur
- 7887 2008-06 MSUploaded byExamStuff
- 04 Reactors and FuelsUploaded bylimakm
- documentUploaded byapi-267702996
- ChemUploaded bydterose
- Fission and FusionUploaded byBrasa Y. de Almira
- Research Development EngineerUploaded byapi-121431561
- October 2013 Answer PhysicsUploaded byNayanBhiwapurkar
- nuclear fission guided notesUploaded byapi-463905397
- physicsUploaded byMental Kitty
- Nuclear Power PlantUploaded byReden
- 3.7_8_2015Uploaded bygrace_lo_1
- Nuclear FuelUploaded bykarthik_naidu

- 3.Unsupervised LearningUploaded byAlexandra Veres
- Decision Trees and Random ForestsUploaded byAlexandra Veres
- ML workshopUploaded byAlexandra Veres
- Git Cheat SheetUploaded bykzelda
- The Electorweak Interaction Part IUploaded byAlexandra Veres
- 04 Phonons-Thermal PropertiesUploaded byAlexandra Veres
- Lattice DynamicsUploaded byAlexandra Veres
- DiffractionUploaded byAlexandra Veres

- Experiment 8 Hydrogen SpectrumUploaded byNadillia Sahputra
- Assignment THERMODYNAMICS SolutionUploaded byJeffry Todo Jeremia
- HYSYS Upstream GuideUploaded byJahangir Malik
- Part 1: Interview Questions and Answers for the Mechanical DomainUploaded bydeepika walde
- Ethanol AnhydrousUploaded byMulayam Singh Yadav
- Thermochemical Treatment of MetalsUploaded byGenes Cristinel
- CondenserUploaded bycirius_cool
- Pages From Enteghal Hararat SenjelUploaded byhamid vahedil larijani
- H2S Solubility in WaterUploaded byGary Jones
- AP Chemistry Mini-Labs (2)Uploaded byNori Hepler
- Vapor Deposition Technologies - SputteringUploaded bythuron
- Crystalline ImperfectionsUploaded byJessica De Guzman
- 6_Plane Mirrors Lesson pptUploaded bydaregumacal
- Estimating Parallel Plate-Fin Heat Sink Thermal Resistance « Electronics Cooling Magazine – Focused on Thermal Management, TIMs, Fans, Heat Sinks, CFD Software, LEDs_LightingUploaded byVivek Agrawal
- Slides for Coating Techniques Part 1 GFE Schmalkalden UniUploaded byfroid1259539
- Crystal Structure of SiliconUploaded byVijayraghavan Ramesh
- es048422mUploaded byTamir Enkh-Amgalan
- Engine Coolant Additives and RadiatorsUploaded byFERTG
- Testosteron LC MS MS APPIUploaded bymikicacica
- Armannsson Geothermal Sampling and AnalysisUploaded byFajar Rizki Widiatmoko
- PHYF144 Tutorial Questions updated.docUploaded byAnonymous KUuLddnO98
- SET - NET Spectroscopy NumericalsUploaded byBapu Thorat
- Performance and Input Output RelationshipsUploaded byAPI
- A Review on Exergy of Food Production ProcessesUploaded byKevin Perez Rojas
- Chapter 3 Partial NotesUploaded byazmaloney7
- A Df Users GuideUploaded byjocomada
- 11 Chemistry Notes Ch09 HydrogenUploaded byNitish Kumar Singh
- Chapter 7Uploaded byricky2112
- electronic spectra - transition metalsUploaded bychemcm
- ENZYMOLOGY (2)Uploaded bybarbie.monster89