You are on page 1of 9

Nama : Marisa Erni Widiyana

NIM : H31116507

Discriminant

Analysis Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Cases N Percent

Valid 16 100.0

Excluded Missing or out-of-range group


0 .0
codes

At least one missing discriminating


0 .0
variable

Both missing or out-of-range group


codes and at least one missing 0 .0
discriminating variable

Total 0 .0

Total 16 100.0

Group Statistics

Valid N (listwise)

TANAH Mean Std. Deviation Unweighted Weighted

A P 2.4696E3 967.97534 8 8.000

K 1.6354E3 743.76704 8 8.000

Ni 39.1962 35.47169 8 8.000

Mo 50.3750 2.44584 8 8.000

B P 2.6321E3 944.85848 8 8.000


K 2.1371E3 659.21543 8 8.000

Ni 41.7662 29.95931 8 8.000

Mo 53.0000 17.92046 8 8.000

Total P 2.5509E3 927.85637 16 16.000

K 1.8862E3 726.69540 16 16.000

Ni 40.4812 31.74589 16 16.000

Mo 51.6875 12.42964 16 16.000

Tests of Equality of Group Means

Wilks' Lambda F df1 df2 Sig.

P .992 .115 1 14 .739

K .873 2.039 1 14 .175

Ni .998 .025 1 14 .878

Mo .988 .169 1 14 .688

Pooled Within-Groups Matricesa

P K Ni Mo

Covariance P 9.149E5 6.660E5 -1.226E4 1.784E3

K 6.660E5 4.939E5 -8.711E3 782.562

Ni -1.226E4 -8.711E3 1.078E3 -113.630

Mo 1.784E3 782.562 -113.630 163.562

Correlation P 1.000 .991 -.390 .146

K .991 1.000 -.378 .087

Ni -.390 -.378 1.000 -.271


Mo .146 .087 -.271 1.000

a. The covariance matrix has 14 degrees of freedom.

Covariance Matricesa

TANAH P K Ni Mo

A P 9.370E5 7.160E5 -6.807E3 1.692E3

K 7.160E5 5.532E5 -6.356E3 1.379E3

Ni -6.807E3 -6.356E3 1.258E3 -3.516

Mo 1.692E3 1.379E3 -3.516 5.982

B P 8.928E5 6.160E5 -1.771E4 1.876E3

K 6.160E5 4.346E5 -1.107E4 185.714

Ni -1.771E4 -1.107E4 897.560 -223.744

Mo 1.876E3 185.714 -223.744 321.143

Total P 8.609E5 6.433E5 -1.133E4 1.779E3

K 6.433E5 5.281E5 -7.787E3 1.082E3

Ni -1.133E4 -7.787E3 1.008E3 -104.256

Mo 1.779E3 1.082E3 -104.256 154.496

a. The total covariance matrix has 15 degrees of freedom.

Analysis 1

Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matrices

Log Determinants
TANAH Rank Log Determinant

A 4 29.415

B 4 34.083

Pooled within-groups 4 34.474

The ranks and natural logarithms of determinants printed are those


of the group covariance matrices.

Test Results

Box's M 38.143

F Approx. 2.602

df1 10

df2 937.052

Sig. .004

Tests null hypothesis of equal


population covariance matrices.

Summary of Canonical Discriminant Functions

Eigenvalues

Canonical
Function Eigenvalue % of Variance Cumulative % Correlation

1 5.938a 100.0 100.0 .925

a. First 1 canonical discriminant functions were used in the analysis.


Wilks' Lambda

Test of
Function(
s) Wilks' Lambda Chi-square df Sig.

1 .144 23.244 4 .000

Standardized Canonical
Discriminant Function
Coefficients

Function

P -8.076

K 8.143

Ni .085

Mo .537

Structure Matrix

Function

K .157

Mo .045

P .037

Ni .017
Pooled within-groups
correlations between
discriminating variables and
standardized canonical
discriminant functions
Variables ordered by
absolute size of correlation
within function.

Canonical Discriminant Function


Coefficients

Function

P -.008

K .012

Ni .003

Mo .042

(Constant) -2.593

Unstandardized coefficients

Functions at Group
Centroids

Function

TANAH 1

A -2.279

B 2.279
Unstandardized canonical
discriminant functions
evaluated at group means

Classification Statistics

Classification Processing Summary

Processed 16

Excluded Missing or out-of-range group


0
codes

At least one missing discriminating


0
variable

Used in Output 16

Prior Probabilities for Groups

Cases Used in Analysis

TANAH Prior Unweighted Weighted

A .500 8 8.000

B .500 8 8.000

Total 1.000 16 16.000

Classification Function Coefficients

TANAH

A B
P .004 -.034

K .000 .052

Ni .113 .125

Mo .345 .537

(Constant) -16.053 -27.876

Fisher's linear discriminant functions

A = (0,004 × 3560) + (0,000 × 2107) + (0,113 × 0,66) + (0,345 × 0,46) - 16,053 = -1,5798
B = (-0,034 × 3560) + (0,052 × 2107) + (0,125 × 0,66) + (0,537 × 0,46) - 27,876 = -39,0225

Casewise Statistics

Highest Group Second Highest Group Discriminant Scores

P(D>d | G=g) Squared Squared


Case Mahalanobis Mahalanobis
Number Actual Group Predicted Group p df P(G=g | D=d) Distance to Centroid Group P(G=g | D=d) Distance to Centroid Function 1

Original 1 1 1 .054 1 .831 3.722 2 .169 6.914 -.350

2 1 1 .787 1 1.000 .073 2 .000 18.393 -2.009

3 1 1 .666 1 1.000 .186 2 .000 17.033 -1.848

4 1 1 .651 1 1.000 .204 2 .000 25.107 -2.731

5 1 1 .767 1 1.000 .088 2 .000 18.163 -1.982

6 1 1 .988 1 1.000 .000 2 .000 20.923 -2.295

7 2 2 .659 1 1.000 .194 1 .000 24.996 2.720

8 2 2 .616 1 1.000 .251 1 .000 25.600 2.780

9 2 2 .358 1 1.000 .845 1 .000 30.009 3.199

10 2 2 .227 1 1.000 1.460 1 .000 33.259 3.488

11 1 1 .163 1 1.000 1.949 2 .000 35.460 -3.675

12 1 1 .287 1 1.000 1.134 2 .000 31.625 -3.344


13 2 2 .307 1 .997 1.044 1 .003 12.512 1.258

14 2 2 .159 1 .982 1.982 1 .018 9.929 .872

15 2 2 .798 1 1.000 .065 1 .000 23.179 2.535

16 2 2 .370 1 .998 .802 1 .002 13.419 1.384

Classification Resultsa

Predicted Group Membership

TANAH A B Total

Original Count A 8 0 8

B 0 8 8

% A 100.0 .0 100.0

B .0 100.0 100.0

a. 100.0% of original grouped cases correctly classified.