Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Building Projects
Ahmad Jrade1 and Sabah Alkass2
Abstract: The cost estimate is considered one of the most important and critical phases of a construction project. Preparing reliable and
accurate estimates to help decision makers is the most challenging assignment that cost engineers and estimators face. For decades,
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by University Of Ulster AT on 06/03/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
practitioners in the construction industry focused only on estimating the initial cost of a facility, neglecting costs associated with operating
and maintaining it. Today, more interest lies in investigating the economics of facility management, which include the cost of owning and
operating a building over its useful life. This paper presents a methodology that can be used for an integrated conceptual cost estimating
and life-cycle cost analysis for construction projects during their initial phase. The methodology describes the development and imple-
mentation of a system that automates the preparation of parametric cost estimates and forecasts future running costs of building projects.
The system integrates relational databases, a parametric cost estimate module, an AutoCAD module, a global module, a cost estimate
forecasting and decision support system module, and a life cycle costing and sensitivity analysis module. The system will automatically
generate a new parametric estimate upon any modification in building design. Once the capital costs are identified, the system forecasts
the cost of running and maintaining the new building throughout its expected service life. After assigning the range of deviation, a
sensitivity analysis is conducted, which identifies the most sensitive parameters for further consideration and analysis. Designing the
system in a user-friendly environment allows owners and decision makers to envision the feasibility of new building projects within their
anticipated life cycles. Moreover, it assists architects and cost engineers in generating parametric cost estimates in a dynamic environment.
A numerical case example is presented to illustrate the usefulness and capabilities of the developed system.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲1076-0431共2007兲13:4共205兲
CE Database subject headings: Computer aided drafting 共CAD兲; Cost estimates; Life cycles; Integrated systems; Databases; Fea-
sibility studies; Sensitivity analysis.
to generate detail for the early budget stages of design when there
Usually, the attentiveness of owners and decision makers is relied
is no formal design; however, one must first have a few available upon to control and constrain the total construction costs of new
parameters and cost data for a completed project that is similar in buildings within their estimated values. Despite the increase in
scope to that of the new design. Furthermore, Ellsworth 共1998兲 the cost of ownership and maintenance of these facilities at their
believes that the simplest method to establish a reasonable esti- operation stage, this is often not considered during the feasibility
mate of facility costs is to identify the costs of similar projects phase, resulting in extra costs. Decision makers need additional
and compare these costs with the cost of the new facility. Never- data, efforts, and information to realize these costs in their esti-
theless, in many instances, cost information is unavailable for mates. Thus, the application of life-cycle costing 共LCC兲 becomes
facilities of comparable size, so facilities of different sizes may one of the main requirements set by owners. Abraham and Dick-
have to be considered when developing cost estimates. The para- inson 共1998兲 believe that life-cycle costing studies show that the
metric approach to cost estimating is a procedure involving the cost of owning and operating a system 共ownership cost兲 can be
use of a constant parameter 共with variable values兲 as a reference quite significant, and may often exceed acquisition costs. Thus,
for other variables 共Melin 1994兲. The parameters from which decisions based solely on acquisition cost may not turn out to be
parametric cost estimates are derived include physical properties the best selection in the long term.
that describe project definition characteristics such as size, build- Fuller and Petersen 共1995兲 define LCC as the total discounted
ing type, foundation type, exterior closure materials, roof type dollar cost of owning, operating, maintaining, and disposing of a
and material, number of floors, and functional space and utility building or a building system over a period of time. Furthermore,
system requirements 共Meyer and Burns 1999兲. they define life-cycle cost analysis 共LCCA兲 as an economic evalu-
ation technique that determines the total cost of owning and op-
erating a facility over its assumed life. We consider LCCA as a
Parametric Cost Model process of evaluating the feasibility of a new project that consid-
ers all involved costs, from initial to disposal. Life-cycle cost
Dysert 共1999兲 indicates that a parametric cost model is an ex- analysis is an essential design process for controlling the initial
tremely useful tool for preparing early parametric estimates, when and future costs of owning a building. LCCA can be implemented
there is little technical data or engineering deliverables to provide at any level of the design process and can be used effectively as a
a basis for using more detailed estimating methods. Moreover, tool to evaluate the systems of an existing building.
Meyer and Burns 共1999兲 believe that the use of the parametric The LCC equation includes the following three variables: 共1兲
model helps to avoid the errors and omissions common in tradi- the pertinent “costs” of ownership; 共2兲 the “study” period over
tional cost estimating procedures, particularly during planning which these costs are incurred; and 共3兲 the “discount rate” that is
and early design phases. The data models used in the preparation applied to future costs to equate them with present day values.
of a parametric estimate are essential to the process. Before a Fuller and Petersen 共1995兲 consider the LCC method of economic
parametric estimate can be generated, estimate data models must analysis as the basic building block of LCCA. Dell’Isola and Kirk
be created; the model’s basic requirements are based on quantita- 共1995兲 consider that a common methodology for LCC, when
tive takeoffs of past estimated projects 共Melin 1994兲. Modeling dealing with architecture/engineering 共A/E兲 systems such as
the parametric cost estimate requires that specific techniques and buildings, includes 共1兲 identification of significant costs for each
methods be followed in order to improve the accuracy and reli- alternative; 共2兲 summation of costs per year; 共3兲 discounting the
ability of that estimate. The most basic method is to identify the costs back to a common base; 共4兲 selecting the lowest cost alter-
intended scope of the project; for buildings, this would be mea- native; and 共5兲 evaluating the final selection with additional non-
sured in gross square feet and referred as the “square foot” economic considerations.
method. This method generally has an accuracy of ±20%; the R. Applying the LCC approach for any facility is not an easy task
S. Means’ Estimating Handbook supports this issue 共Larson for cost engineers and estimators. Many problems arise, depend-
2002兲. Furthermore, Karshenas 共1984兲 mentions that one of the ing on the facility type and the owner’s needs. Assaf et al. 共2002兲
most common methods used in parametric estimates is the square have drawn up five categories of problems, which are as follows:
foot method. In it, historical building cost data or cost books are 共1兲 knowledge problems; 共2兲 data problems; 共3兲 procedural prob-
lems; 共4兲 management problems; and 共5兲 cost problems.
used to get an estimate of the cost per square foot of the type of
building under consideration. The estimated unit cost is then mul-
tiplied by the gross floor area of the proposed building after being Management Information System
adjusted for factors as location, size, and the expected quality of The availability of historical data is indispensable for the prepa-
the proposed building. Therefore, besides the methods, param- ration of cost estimates. The data must be properly organized and
Fig. 7. Phase 4 process flow diagram soon as the user inputs the range of deviation for the sensitivity
analysis, the module computes the present worth for each compo-
nent separately, based on the inputted deviation, and writes these
area, exterior wall, and frame type is retrieved for the parametric
values into the database. In order to automate the process of
cost estimate. The module retrieves size, perimeter, and floor-to-
drawing the sensitivity analysis graph, Microsoft Excel is used
floor height parameters from the modified drawings and automati-
cally adjusts them, using procedures and equations derived for due to its ability to execute this task. However, an internal module
this purpose. Adjustments for exterior wall enclosure and frame in Excel is created and its drop-down menu is customized so that
structure type are inherent in the module and are automatically the user is allowed to draw the graph by a single click from that
made depending on the user selection. menu.
This phase consists of designing a module that automatically fore- This phase integrates a forecasting and DSS module that forecasts
casts the operating cost of the building and its predictable yearly the costs of the proposed project when users select the forecasting
income based on its lifespan. This includes using the sensitivity equations used in the parametric estimate. This module incorpo-
analysis method on sets of predefined parameters to determine rates three different submodules. Two of these modules forecast
the most critical ones. Fig. 7 illustrates the process flow of the
the cost based on either the size or budget, whereas the third
module.
encompasses a DSS that automatically selects the best project and
The first step is to collect all the data needed during the design
its associated 3D-CAD drawings, based on the user’s budget. To
and development process of this phase. Normally, in-house data
simplify the design and implementation procedures of this phase,
are collected from previously executed projects so that an accept-
able level of confidence can be achieved. Published data can also Fig. 8 shows a workflow diagram depicting the different steps of
be used after identifying the source and level of accuracy. This each of the three submodules. Fig. 9 shows a process flow dia-
paper uses data published by the Building Owners and Managers gram for the two submodules.
Association 共BOMA from year 1984 to 1997兲 and the Consumer First, all the cost data are organized into a tabulated format
Price Index 共CPI兲 共published by Statistics Canada from year 1984 depending on four parameters: 共1兲 project type; 共2兲 exterior wall
to 2002兲. The components of LCC used in this paper include the type; 共3兲 framing system type; and 共4兲 total floor area. The area is
following: 共a兲 Rent; 共b兲 retail; and 共c兲 total operating expenses the key that links the perimeter value and all cost data, including
plus fixed expenses plus leasing costs 共TOEFEL兲. The first two materials, installation, division/elements, total square feet, and
are sources of income, whereas the third is expense and consists project costs. The forthcoming sections present detailed explana-
of cleaning, repair and maintenance, utilities, administration, tions of the procedures taken during the design of each of the
fixed expenses, leasing expenses, and road ground and security three submodules.
expenses. Since the data used are based on BOMA reports, ad-
justment factors have to be applied for the LCC components.
Known as impact factors 共Zhang 1999兲, these factors include ad- Forecasting Estimate Based on Size Entry Submodule
justments for the following: 共1兲 city; 共2兲 location, 共i.e., downtown/
In this submodule, cost data are classified and tabulated based
suburban兲; 共3兲 height of the building 共i.e., number of floors兲; and
共4兲 age and size 共i.e., building age and size in unit area兲. The on the total floor area and the square foot cost of each of the
factors applied to the components used in this paper are as fol- parameters mentioned in the foregoing paragraph. The data for
lows: each division and its associated elements are organized and tabu-
• Income factors include: Income city factor, income location lated as percentages according to the total floor area. Once all the
factor, income height factor, income size factor, and income pertinent cost data are organized into sets of tables, graphs are
age factor. developed for each set of data using spreadsheets. Associated
• Expense factors include: Expense city factor, expense location equations of the best-fitted lines are derived. All the derived equa-
factor, expense height factor, expense size factor, and expense tions are included in the submodule to forecast the costs of the
age factor. proposed project. Once the user selects the project type, exterior
The gathered data are analyzed so that new sets of data are wall, and framing system type, the module will forecast the
determined using overall and weighted-average methods. Further- project’s costs.
Forecasting Costs Based on Budget Entry Submodule proach in the design and implementation of the DSS. The system
contains a total of 70 rules related to the system functionality.
This submodule’s design is similar to the previous one, except
These rules are divided into three groups as follows: 共1兲 wide,
that the cost data are organized and stored based on the total cost
containing 20 rules; 共2兲 intermediate, containing 20 rules; and 共3兲
and on the cost per square foot of each of the parameters men-
narrow, containing 30 rules. A workflow process diagram has
tioned in the previous paragraph. All necessary equations are de-
been designed in order to identify the steps that this submodule
rived and used to forecast the area of the proposed project and the
will execute, as shown in Fig. 10. The process begins by inputting
estimated costs based on the budget entry.
the budget, then selecting the rule type. The system automatically
searches for projects in which the direct construction costs rank
Decision Support System Based on Budget within the budget entered by the user. In case of an empty listing,
Entry Submodule the system stops the search until the user changes the rule type. In
In this submodule, a DSS is designed in order to assist users in case a list is provided, a selection of the project is made, and the
selecting the best project size from the database and its associated submodule forecasts the area accordingly, using the derived equa-
3D-CAD drawings within their anticipated budget. In Phase 2, in tions. Once the user accepts this value, the submodule forecasts
order to store 3D-CAD drawings, a special database is designed, the whole estimated costs using the same stated equations. Upon
which the DSS uses in selecting the best-fit drawing, based on the the user’s request, the DSS selects from the specified database the
forecasted area. This paper uses the rule-based reasoning ap-
Fig. 9. Phase 5 process flow diagram Fig. 10. DSS workflow process diagram
most suitable 3D-CAD drawing, which it makes available to the project direct construction cost from 1996 to 2000. Thus, an in-
user to animate and modify. Routed on the drawing’s modifica- flation rate of 3% is used; this brings the project’s actual construc-
tion, the new parameters are read and written to the database, and tion costs in 2000 amount to $11,541,334. Next, the estimating
immediately a new estimate is forecasted and provided. After- tool is applied to select a project involving a high-rise building
wards, the user can forecast the running costs of the proposed with an area close to 129,095 ft2 is selected from the database.
project and apply sensitivity analysis as mentioned in previous The process starts by selecting the estimating tool to be used from
paragraphs. the main form. Afterwards, once we select the project type, which
is “apartment, 8–24 story,” the system asks to select a combina-
tion of area, exterior wall type, and framing system type. At this
Numerical Case Example stage, the selected parameters that are compatible with the actual
project are the following: 129,000 ft2, ribbed precast concrete
The preceding paragraphs explored in detail the methodology fol- panels, and steel frame, respectively. Based on this selection, the
lowed in developing the integrated system. This section validates system contacts the database and queries the cost data related to
the capabilities of the system. The performance of the system is the entered parameters. It retrieves and provides the information
examined through an actual high-rise building project constructed in three different formats that are summarized, detailed by divi-
in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, by an owner-developer sions, and detailed by elements. Fig. 11 demonstrates one of these
firm. The project consists of 80 units and has a ribbed precast formats. Clicking the “associated AutoCAD drawing” button
concrete panel as the exterior wall type and steel frame as the opens the associated 3D-CAD drawing as shown in Fig. 12. That
structural framing type. Furthermore, it has a gross area of drawing has a total floor area of 129,000 ft2, a floor area of
129,095 ft2, and its construction was consummated in 1996 for a 8,600 ft2, 15 stories, and a perimeter of 547 ft; therefore, it has to
direct construction cost of $10,254,326. The total project costs be adjusted in a way that meets the actual values of the project at
were $23,029,641; included in these costs is an indirect cost of hand. Hence, we have modified the floor area from 8,600 to
$12,775,315, out of which $5,042,964 is the cost of land. The 4,621 ft2, the perimeter from 547 to 401 ft, the number of floors
system’s capabilities and performance are measured using the de- from 15 to 28, and the total floor area to 129,033 ft2. Based on the
veloped estimating tools, which are the database, forecasting parameters retrieved from the modified drawing, a new cost esti-
equations based on size, and forecasting equations based on bud- mate is generated after executing all needed adjustments. These
get 共by using the DSS and manual selection兲. adjustments are based on size, perimeter, inflation, and location as
exemplified in Fig. 13. Note that the floor height has not been
changed, so no adjustment is required. Since the direct construc-
Estimating Using Database
tion cost of the actual project has already been adjusted from year
Since all the cost data used in the system are based on the national 1996 to 2000, adjustment for inflation is not needed. Therefore, a
average costs for the year 2000, it is necessary to update the value of zero is entered in the “Inflation Rate” and the “Number
of Years” as shown in Fig. 13. Nevertheless, an adjustment for able result, and accordingly demonstrates the capability of the
location is required, so a new square footage cost is computed. A system to supply a high level of accuracy for proposed projects at
new cost estimate is generated as displayed in Fig. 14. Adjusting their feasible stage.
the $10,592,190 shown in Fig. 11 from the national average cost We were not able to gather actual data about the cost of run-
to Vancouver gives us a value of $11,481,934; this is for an area ning the actual building. For that reason we will use the system to
of 129,000 ft2 and a perimeter of 406 ft. Comparing this value forecast these costs without any level of comparison. By selecting
with the new project estimated cost given in Fig. 14 共i.e., the “life-cycle costing” top menu and the “forecast project LCC”
$12,882,156 for an area of 129,033 ft2 and perimeter of 401 ft兲 button, the system immediately opens the form shown in Fig. 15,
shows a difference of $1,400,222, which is around 12.2%. Based and asks us to enter some necessary data so that the module can
on AACE International Classification 共18R-97兲, the expected forecast the LCC. The data needed consists of: 共1兲 land area; 共2兲
range of accuracy for Class 5 estimates, where the level of project land price/ ft2; 共3兲 office rental area; 共4兲 retail space area; 共5兲 other
definition is between 0% and 2%, is from −50% to 100%. For a income; 共6兲 salvage value; 共7兲 LCC period of study; 共8兲 office
Class 4 estimate that has a project level of definition ranging rental rate/ ft2; 共9兲 interest rate; and 共10兲 inflation rate, as exem-
between 1% and 5%, the expected accuracy level is −30% to plified in Fig. 15. Once all these data are entered, the system
+50%. Therefore, the system’s validation is above the acceptable supplies us with a list of output reports from which to select; Figs.
level, which means its outcomes are dependable and hold a high 16 and 17 show two of these reports. The first provides a break-
level of accuracy. down of the expenses per square foot cost based on their fixed
After entering the indirect costs as percentages, the system percentages. The second shows the life-cycle costing analysis re-
provides users with a list of four different types of output reports, sult, which calculates the saving investment ratio, used to identify
consisting of two graphical and two tabulated, and users are asked whether the proposed project is feasible.
to select the desired one共s兲. Yet, as mentioned previously, the total
project costs of $23,029,641 include a land fee of $5,042,964. If
Forecasting the Costs Based on Size
we remove this value, the actual project cost for 1996 would be
$17,986,677 and for 2000 would be $20,244,163. The value cal- The same cost data used in the previous section is used to validate
culated by the system after entering the indirect costs is the system using linear regression equations based on the size
$18,073,665. Comparing the two values shows a difference of entry. To start, we have to make a group of selections that in-
− $ 2,170,498, which corresponds to −12.00%. This is an accept- cludes the area, exterior wall type, and framing type. The system
prompts the user to enter the area 共129,095 ft2兲 and, once entered, footage cost adjusted for the city of Vancouver, which gives us a
forecasts the cost based on the entered value using linear regres- value of $100/ ft2. Based on this value, the system forecasts the
sion equations. The system searches for the best-fitted 3D-CAD new estimate and provides us with four different formats. As seen
drawing from the database that has an area close to the one en- in Fig. 18, the new forecasted construction cost of the modified
tered when the user clicks on the “associated AutoCAD drawing” drawing is $12,929,712 for the year 2000, whereas the value of
button. Associated drawing adjustments then have to be made the actual project at the same year is $11,541,334. There is a
based on the new parameters extracted from the drawing. difference of + $ 1,388,378, which corresponds to +12.03%.
The linear regression equations are based on the national av- Based on AACE International Classification 共18R-97兲, this is a
erage cost for the year 2000, and since we have adjusted the direct very good accuracy level for this type of cost estimate. Adding
construction cost of the actual project from year 1996 to 2000, we the indirect costs to the forecasted one, the system provides a total
considered the inflation rate and number of years as zero. How- cost of $18,140,386 compared to $20,244,163 for the actual
ever, an adjustment for location is made to have the final square project in 2000. This gives a difference of − $ 2,103,777, matching
a −11.59%. We can forecast the running costs of the project by different from the actual one by −92 ft2, which corresponds to
following the same procedures taken in the previous paragraph. −0.071%. Afterward, the system forecasts all the components of
the estimate, and supplies them in three different formats. Fig. 21
Forecasting the Costs Based on Budget shows a summary. Selecting the “associated AutoCAD drawing”
button in that form runs the DSS in an attempt to find a 3D-CAD
To use this estimating tool, we have to adjust the actual direct drawing that has the closest area to the forecasted one; the se-
construction cost from 1996 to 2004. The reason for doing so is lected drawing has an area of 129,500 ft2 and a perimeter of
that, in this tool, the system brings back the budget-entered value 548.09 ft, and is shown in Fig. 22. This drawing is modified in a
to the year 2000 and national average cost because the derived way such that its area is 129,033 ft2 and perimeter is 401 ft. Af-
linear regression equations derived previously were based on this terward, these parameters are sent to the external database, and all
type of cost for the mentioned year. Thus, the actual direct con- required adjustments are automatically executed by the system.
struction cost of $10,254,326 is adjusted for year 2004 by consid- Ultimately, a new cost estimate is generated and provided by
ering an inflation rate of 3%; the new value is $12,989,873. Once the system in four different formats, as described in previous
the budget is entered, the system identifies the city where the sections. Moreover, the system provides four different formats of
project is located, in this case Vancouver, and changes the default output reports to select from following the input of the indirect
value of the city. The new computed value has to be brought to percentages; Fig. 23 exemplifies a summarized report. Normally,
year 2000; for this reason, the system needs the inflation rate, the system forecasts the running costs of the selected project after
which is 3%, in our case. The system automatically identifies the sets of input are made, as mentioned previously. To apply the
number of years by reading the current year from the computer’s sensitivity analysis method, we input the range of errors 共−50% to
date and then adjusts the costs to year 2000. At this stage, the +50% with a step of 5兲, and the system executes all necessary
system asks for the project’s category, which is “commercial,”
calculations and draws the graph as seen in Fig. 24.
and after that whether to run the DSS or manually select the
project type. We select to run the DSS as seen in Fig. 19. Before
running the DSS, we select the “narrow” rule type, and based on
this selection, the DSS provides two projects, the direct costs of Summary
which are compatible with the entered one. One of these projects
is “apartment, 8–24 story” that has “ribbed precast concrete This paper presents a methodology for modeling the procedures
panel” as the exterior wall type and “steel” as the framing type, as of generating parametric cost estimates and life-cycle costing of
illustrated in Fig. 20. Once the “continue” top menu is clicked, building projects by the integration of 3D-CAD drawings and
the system bases its calculations on the value of $10,646,987 to relational databases with a workable system. The system includes
forecast the area that is found to be 129,003 ft2. This value is a parametric cost estimate module, an AutoCAD module, a global
Fig. 22. Area and perimeter of the provided drawing by the DSS
visual basic module, a life-cycle costing and sensitivity analysis 共BOMA, 1984 to 1997兲 publications for life-cycle costing calcu-
module, and a linear regression and decision support system mod- lations. The developed system is intended to assist owners, archi-
ule. The system’s databases are based on R. S. Means’ national tects, and cost engineers in generating an understanding of the
average costs data 共R. S. Means, 2000a,b兲 for the parametric cost cost of construction projects and their anticipated running costs at
estimate, and on the Building Owners and Managers Association the very earliest stages. Furthermore, the system allows users to
create different scenarios through the integration of 3D-CAD the federal energy management program.” NIST handbook 135,
drawings, enabling them to design a project that meets their tech- 具http://www.bfrl.nist.gov/oae/publications/handbooks/135.pdf典 共Feb.
nical requirements and limited budget. Time reduction, fast cal- 10, 2004兲.
culation execution, easy drawing modification, efficient estimated Hemiö, T., and Salonen, M. 共2000兲. “Virtual reality: Human interface to
and running costs predictions, effective project selection, and product data.” CIT, Iceland, 457–464.
professional-output report generation are some of the system’s Karshenas, S. 共1984兲. “Predesign cost estimating method for multistory
advantages. buildings.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 110共1兲, 79–86.
Kibert, J. C., and Hollister, C. K. 共1994兲. “An enhanced construction
specific SQL.” Autom. Constr., 2共4兲, 303–312.
Kim, Y. S., Oh, S. W., Kim, J. R., and Sung, B. J. 共2000兲. “The develop-
References
ment of an automated system using 3D CAD and relational database.”
Proc., 17th Symp. on Automation and Robotics in Construction XVII,
Abraham, D. M., and Dickinson, R. J. 共1998兲. “Disposal costs for Taiwan, 827–833.
environmentally regulated facilities: LCC approach.” J. Constr. Eng.
Kunigahalli, R. 共1997兲. “3D modeling for computer-integrated construc-
Manage., 124共2兲, 146–154.
tion of RC structures.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 11共2兲, 92–101
Aouad, G., Kirkham, J., Brandon, P., Brown, F., Child, T., Cooper, G.,
Larson, D. P. 共2002兲. “Conceptual estimating.” Proc., Transactions of the
Ford, S., Oxman, R., and Young, B. 共1995兲. “The conceptual model-
ing of construction management information.” Autom. Constr., 3共4兲, American Association of Cost Engineering, 46th Annual Meeting,
267–282. Portland, Ore., EST.07.1–EST.07.3.
Assaf, S. A., Al-Hammad, A., Jannadi, O. A., and Abu Saad, S. 共2002兲. Lipman, R., and Reed, K. 共2000兲. “Using VRML in construction in-
“Assessment of the problems of application of life cycle costing in dustry applications.” 具http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build00/PDF/
construction projects.” Cost Eng., 44共2兲, 17–22. b00013.pdf典 共May 15, 2003兲.
Bajaj, A., Gransberg, D. D., and Grenz, D. M. 共2002兲. “Parametric esti- Loucopoulos, P., and Zicari, R. 共1992兲. Conceptual modeling, databases,
mating for design costs.” Proc., Trans. American Association of Cost and CASE: An integrated view of information systems development,
Engineers, 46th Annual Meeting, Portland, Ore., EST.08.1–EST.08.6. Wiley, New York.
Building Owners and Managers Association 共BOMA兲. 共2002兲. 2002 Means, R. S. 共2000a兲. Means assembly costs data, 21st Annual Ed., R. S.
BOMA Experience Exchange Report, BOMA International. Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Mass.
Dell’Isola, A., and Kirk, S. 共1995兲. Life cycle costing for design profes- Means, R. S. 共2000b兲. Means square foot costs data, 21st Annual Ed., R.
sionals, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York. S. Means Company, Inc., Kingston, Mass.
Dunston, P. S., and Bernold, L. E. 共2000兲. “Adaptive control for safe and Melin, J. B. 共1994兲. “Parametric estimation.” Cost Eng., 36共1兲, 19–24.
quality rebar fabrication.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 126共2兲, 122–129. Meyer, R. E., and Burns, J. T. 共1999兲. “Facility parametric cost estimat-
Dysert, R. L. 共1999兲. “Developing a parametric model for estimating ing.” Proc., Trans. American Association of Cost Engineers, 43rd An-
process control costs.” Proc., Transactions of the American Associa- nual Meeting, Denver, EST.02.1–EST.02.6.
tion of Cost Engineers, 43rd Annual Meeting, Denver, EST.01.1– Oberlender, D. G., and Trost, S. M. 共2001兲. “Predicting accuracy of early
EST.01.4. cost estimates based on estimate quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.,
Ellsworth, K. R. 共1998兲. “Cost-to-capacity analysis for estimating waste- 127共3兲, 173–182.
to-energy facility costs.” Cost Eng., 40共6兲, 27–30. Park, C., Choi, S., and Kim, K. 共1999兲. “An efficient quantity takeoff
Elmasri, R., and Navathe, S. B. 共2000兲. Fundamentals of database sys- method for the preliminary design phase.” Proc., Trans. American
tems, 3rd Ed., Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., Reading, Mass. Association of Cost Engineers, 43rd Annual Meeting, Denver,
Fuller, S. K., and Petersen, S. R. 共1995兲. “Life-cycle costing manual for EST.09.1–EST.09.5.