Trespass To Person - Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment in Torts Law
Trespass To Person - Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment in Torts Law
An assault is an act which intentionally causes another person to apprehend the in iction of
the immediate, unlawful force on a person.
Holroyd J stated that no words or singing are equivalent to an assault. Therefore, words
alone can’t amount to assault. However, if the words caused the person to apprehend
force then there should be no reason why it couldn’t be an assault.
A battery consists an intentional application of force to another person without any lawful
justi cation.
Essential Requirements :
A false imprisonment is complete deprivation of liberty for any time, however short, without
any lawful excuse.
Section 339 of Indian Penal Code states wrongful restraint ( partial restraint ) , Therefore it
doesn’t amounts to false imprisonment.
Section 340 of Indian Penal Code ( IPC ) states wrongful con nement ( total restraint ) , that
mean no way to escape, thus results in false imprisonment.
http://upreparelaw.com/trespass-to-person-assault-battery-false-imprisonment-notes-torts-law/ 4/11
12/9/2018 Trespass to person : Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment in Torts Law ( Complete Notes pdf ) - UPrepareLaw
Therefore, if there is reasonable escape route, then there will be no false imprisonment as
there will be no total restraint. For Example : if a person is con ned in a room at ground
oor with window of the room be opened, for a man with ordinary prudence it doesn’t
amount to false imprisonment.
Also, period of con nement doesn’t matter, even if the con nement was just for two
minutes, it will also be treated as false imprisonment. More the time period of con nement,
more will be the compensation.
Intention factor per se is considered as a general rule, i.e, it’s an intentional tort and
negligence plays the part of intention.
Case Law : Meering V. Graham White Aviation Co. Ltd. ( 1920 ) ( Preferred Judgement )
An employee was suspected of theft and he was kept in waiting room with some other
employees till the police reached. Even other employees were directed to keep an eye on
him andprevent from to go out.
Police came and all the formalities were carried out and found that plainti was not involved
in theft. Plainti sued the defendant for false imprisonment. The court held the company
liable though the plainti wasn’t aware of the con nement earlier.
http://upreparelaw.com/trespass-to-person-assault-battery-false-imprisonment-notes-torts-law/ 5/11
12/9/2018 Trespass to person : Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment in Torts Law ( Complete Notes pdf ) - UPrepareLaw
In order to say that a retention to be falsely imprisoned, it is necessary that the retention
must be unlawful without any justi cation.
Case Law : Herd V. Weardales, Steel, Coal and Coke Co. Ltd.
A contract between the plainti and the defendant was signed that plainti will work in mine
for a particular shift. Plainti requested to come out of the mine but defendant didn’t allow
him to come out. The court held that there is no false imprisonment as the defendant was
having the defence of the signed contract by the plainti .
Place of Confinement
It could be any place. It is not necessary that the con ned place must be Jail or something
like that. Any place where the person is totally restrained of his freedom to move results in
false imprisonment.
Consent of plainti or Volenti Non Fit Injuria : There is no imprisonment if the plainti
agrees or freely chose to act in conformity with the request of the defendant. For example :
One who enters the premises of others upon some terms which involves some restrictions
on his liberty can’t complain of false imprisonment.
http://upreparelaw.com/trespass-to-person-assault-battery-false-imprisonment-notes-torts-law/ 6/11
12/9/2018 Trespass to person : Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment in Torts Law ( Complete Notes pdf ) - UPrepareLaw
as money was only charged at one side of the crossing. Since, there was a reasonable
condition imposed, it can’t be said that the plainti was falsely imprisoned.
2. Contributory Negligence
3. Self Defence
The law permits the use of reasonable force to protect one’s person or property. If
defendant uses force which is necessary for self defence, he will not be liable for the harm
caused thereby. The force should not be excessive.
http://upreparelaw.com/trespass-to-person-assault-battery-false-imprisonment-notes-torts-law/ 7/11
12/9/2018 Trespass to person : Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment in Torts Law ( Complete Notes pdf ) - UPrepareLaw
A parent is not guilty of an assault if he physically interferes with his child. Interference can
be by the way of reasonable restraint, or chastisement, or therapeutic reasons.
For example : While taking a blood sample a child may not act nicely, therefore use of force
by parent in such case will be reasonable.
Person who disturbs the public worship or public meeting must be lawfully removed for
making the things good.
6. Statutory Authority
7. Prevention of Trespass
For the prevention of trespass only reasonable and justi ed force should be used and that
too be used after the warning.
8. Inevitable Accidents
Inevitable accidents means something that can’t be avoided or something that wasn’t
reasonably foreseen even after due care and caution.
Damages are the usual sort of remedies that are granted to plainti . But in some case
aggravated damages or pecuniary damages are granted depending upon the facts of case.
2. Habeas Corpus
It is a writ requiring a person under arrest to be brought before a judge or into court,
especially to secure the person’s release unless lawful grounds are shown for their
detention.
3. Self Help
Self Help is di erent from self defence. It means helping yourself to get out of the
con nement. Though there are provisions for it :
http://upreparelaw.com/trespass-to-person-assault-battery-false-imprisonment-notes-torts-law/ 8/11
12/9/2018 Trespass to person : Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment in Torts Law ( Complete Notes pdf ) - UPrepareLaw
If the means of escape is reasonable, and the plainti tries to escape and got injured
in the process, he can even claim those damages. For example, A person locked in a
room on ground oor with one window open. This is considered as reasonable
means of escape.
If the means of escape is not reasonable , and still the plainti tries to escape and got
injured in the process, he can’t get damages for this. For example, A person locked in
a room on 7th oor with one window open. Here, it is clearly seen that the means of
escape isn’t reasonable.
Tumblr
Related
General Defences in Torts Law Malicious Prosecution Complete Damnum Sine Injuria [Complete
Notes pdf With Case Laws Notes pdf ( With All Famous Notes With Case Laws]
March 12, 2017 Case Laws ) : Law Of Torts March 3, 2017
In "Act Of God with case laws" May 1, 2017 In "Damnum Sine Injuria"
In "Law of Tort"
http://upreparelaw.com/trespass-to-person-assault-battery-false-imprisonment-notes-torts-law/ 9/11