On December 17, the Springfield City Council voted to accept MGL ch 40 §5B, which allows for the establishment of special purposes funds with dedicated revenue. Specifically the Council directed half of local option revenue from recreational marijuana sales to go toward neighborhood stabilization funds. Mayor Domenic Sarno vetoed, arguing the 50% dedication was too high.
Original Title
Mayor Domenic Sarno's veto of an order establishing a special fund for neighborhood stabilization.
On December 17, the Springfield City Council voted to accept MGL ch 40 §5B, which allows for the establishment of special purposes funds with dedicated revenue. Specifically the Council directed half of local option revenue from recreational marijuana sales to go toward neighborhood stabilization funds. Mayor Domenic Sarno vetoed, arguing the 50% dedication was too high.
On December 17, the Springfield City Council voted to accept MGL ch 40 §5B, which allows for the establishment of special purposes funds with dedicated revenue. Specifically the Council directed half of local option revenue from recreational marijuana sales to go toward neighborhood stabilization funds. Mayor Domenic Sarno vetoed, arguing the 50% dedication was too high.
THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS
MAYOR DOMENIC J. SARNO.
HOME OF THE BASKETBALL HALL OF FAME
Thave made the decision to veto the Council order creating the Impacted Neighborhood
Stabilization Fund. This order ereates a new fund that will take in 50% of the excise tax revenue
that the City eams on recreational marijuana sales. The fund will be dedicated to “improving the
quality of life in and economic capacity of” neighborhoods that have been disproportionately
affected by cannabis prohibition.
Ihave not chosen to veto this order because I disagree with the Council's motivation for
creating this fund, I completely understand their intent; nevertheless, I cannot approve this order
as itis currently written, My chief concern is that it is not prudent fiscal policy to dedicate half
of a revenue source to a fund, when the size of those revenues is still unknown, Additionally, I
believe clear procedures for how this revenue shall be used should be created before they are
dedicated to the fund.
On Friday, November 30%, I met with Councilors Melvin Edwards and Jesse Lederman,
along with my Chief of Staff, Tom Ashe and our Chief Administrative and Financial Officer,
TJ. Plante to discuss this order and the creation of the Neighborhood Stabilization Fund. I
agreed with their motivation for creating the fund and thought that we had reached an
understanding that the order would dedicate 25% of the revenues generated by the excise tax on.
marijuana to the fund. I am not comfortable with setting the amount at 50% as a starting point.
‘We can continue to look at this as we get a clearer picture of the actual revenue generated.
I look forward to working with the Council to revisit this issue and to collaborating with
them on developing a set of clear policies and procedures that will govern how this fund shall be
used. Working together, I believe we can develop a solution that will exemplify the commitment
that the members of the Couneil and I both hold to the City’s neighborhoods and sound fiscal
policy.
City of Springfield + 36 Court Street + Springfield, MA 01103-1687 + (413) 787-6100