You are on page 1of 386



Ron Paul quotations from the back cover:

“David Duke was hurt by his past and lost the election. How many
more Dukes are there waiting in the wings without such a taint?”

“There is plenty of evidence that John Demanjuk — an American
deported to Israel who may be executed there – is innocent. And
now there is also evidence that Andrija Artukovic was not the war
criminal he was portrayed by to be.”

“Some people even think that the government itself could have been
responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing.”

He would privatize the National Parks: “I would dissolve the
Department of the Interior.”

Paul would legalize NAMBLA “There should be no age of consent




Copyright © 2014
All rights reserved.














































The Late Former New York City Mayor Ed Koch:

“Ron Paul's candidacy for President, for me, was that
of a David Duke without an armband.”

Ron Paul is no libertarian; he is a crypto-Nazi. Crypto-Nazism is
a term implying a secret support for, or admiration of, the genocidal
political and economic system invented by Adolf Hitler. The term is
used to imply that an individual or group keeps this support or
admiration hidden in order to avoid political prosecution or, in Ron
Paul’s case, political suicide. Crypto-Nazis maintain covers such as
“libertarian” and “populist” to disguise a hidden agenda. They use
code words e.g. “Goldman-Sachs” means Jews.

What makes Ron Paul The Most Dangerous Nazi in America is
his immense popularity and the fact that he is part of an electoral
resurgence of Fascism and Nazism in other Western democracies.
In Greece the Nazi Golden Dawn Party got 7% of the popular vote
and in France Marine Le Pen got 19% of the vote. In America Paul
got 11.01% of the Republican Primary vote or 1,821,126 votes. Paul

was able to inspire Edward Snowden to commit an act of treason
that will always be remembered in American history alongside
Benedict Arnold. This book rips the cloak of deception off of Ron
Paul and exposes his true pathological genocidal self, a Nazi swine
without a swastika. After reading this book ask yourself “Would I
vote for the son of Hitler? Would I vote for Rand Paul? You can buy
Ron Paul, The Most Dangerous Nazi in America on Amazon by
clicking here.

*** Currency destruction.

History shows us that riots, violence, and full-scale police states can
result when people finally realize their money isn’t worth the paper
it’s printed on and REFUSE to accept it. Yet those who leech off the
Federal Reserve System don’t care.

If you had listened to Ron Paul and purchased Gold at 1800 an
ounce you would be worshipping the Federal Reserve by this time.
The reason Paul hates the Fed is because its chairpeople are
traditionally Jewish.

ISIS and al-Qaeda were nowhere to be found before the US
launched its war against Iraq -- a war based on lies pushed by the
rabidly pro-Israel neocons who believed it would help that country


dominate the region. PS Your donation can help me wipe the smirks
off the neocons faces.

Paul is getting closer and closer to saying “Jews” instead of neo-

That's why I'm counting on you to sign your "Vote NO! on Lynch"
Action Fax urging your U.S. Senators to vote against Loretta
Lynch's nomination for Attorney General.

Paul claims he opposes Lynch because of civil forfeiture. The real
reason is because she is black.


“As they head further down the road of losing wars and wrecking
Anglo-American liberties, Messrs Obama and Cameron and their
supporters in all parties would do well to read the words of the great
17th century English republican Algernon Sidney, a man who was
revered on both sides of the Atlantic, who greatly influenced
America's founders, and who was executed by the British Crown for
what it described as sedition. "There must therefore be a right,"
Sidney wrote, "of proceeding judicially or extra-judicially against all
persons who transgress the laws; or else those laws, and the
societies that should subsist by them, cannot stand; and the ends
for which governments are constituted, together with the
governments themselves, must be overthrown. ... If he [a political
leader] be justly accounted an enemy of all, who injures all; he
above all must be the publick enemy of a nation, who by usurping
power over them, does the greatest and most publick injury that a
people can suffer. For which reason, by an established law among
the most virtuous nations, every man might kill a tyrant; and no
names are recorded in history with more honor, than of those who
did it."



When the host of Money and Markets, Charles Goyette, recently
said that it is “shocking that the American people are prohibited from
knowing the whole truth about 9/11,” Paul agreed:

“Boy, that’s for sure. It’s shocking, but then, when you stop and think
about it, shouldn’t we expect this from our government? Which is
really sad. It's politically very risky to talk about it, but I’ve come to
the conclusion that all government commissions are designed to
protect the government. … I believe that if we ever get the full truth
[about 9/11], we’ll find out that our government had it in the records
exactly what the plans were, or at least close to it.”

So the government, whoever that might be, knew about the attack
and let it happen. That makes them mass murderers. Remember
before he retired Paul was part of that very same government.

“Does [foreknowledge of the attacks] prove that our president and
others actually sat down and laid the plans and did this? I don’t think
it does, but I think it does show that one of the reasons why they
want to cover it up is because they don’t want to say, the FBI and
the CIA were, at the time, spending $40 billion a year to spy on
everybody to make us safe and secure, and therefore they really
messed up, so they had to hide that. Our own government did more
harm to the liberties of the American people than Bin Laden did.”

Why even pose a question like that about Bush planning the attack
then say I don’t believe it myself. Why even bring it into play? Paul
feels America’s enemies are worse than America. He is a traitor.
Paul later commented on ISIS:


That Saudi Arabia is considered a suitable place to train Syria's
future leaders must be some kind of sick joke. While ISIS was
beheading two American journalists — as horrific as that is — the
repressive Saudi theocracy was beheading dozens of its own
citizens, often for relatively minor or religious crimes.

Again he is paying a backhanded compliment to those sworn to
destroy America and force its citizens to convert to Islam. He is
making excuses for the ISIS beheadings. He is on their side.

There are 200 million people bordering the countries where ISIS is
currently operating. They are the ones facing the threat of ISIS
activity and expansion. Let them fight their own war, rather than
turning the U.S. military into the mercenary army of wealthy Gulf
states. Remember, they come over here because we are over there.
So let's not be over there any longer.

In other words let ISIS exist so it can destroy Israel. That is Paul’s
motivation because as a Nazi he believe Jews are responsible for
all the evil in the world and if you get rid of them you will have

Paul’s Intelligence Advisor Michael Scheurer is a favorite of the
Islamic and its hostage, Cantile, quoted him in a video.

So, let’s get straight to the point with a quote from former CIA chief
turned vigorous anti-intervention campaigner Michael Scheuer.
“President Obama does not have the slightest intention of defeating
the Islamic State, which would require the aerial slaughter, and
boots on the ground demolishing of the Mujahideen. Think what you
will of the Islamists and their brand of war making, but they have
been in the field fighting since 1979, and their movement has never
been larger, more popular, or as well armed as it is today.”


Scheuer's criticism of US strategy for fighting jihadists was once
praised by Osama bin Laden in a 2007 video, where the terror
leader recommended his book "if you want to understand what's
going on".


What Can Be Learned From the Golden Dawn Arrests?



Greece's far right Golden Dawn party looks like a rather nasty piece
of work.

Note the photo used in the Ron Paul article. It does not contain
the swastika-like symbol of Golden Dawn. Golden Dawn looks like
Nazis but it really isn’t, it only looks that way and in fact it is a good

Supporters have been photographed in what appears to be Nazi-
esque salutes; its party logo looks suspiciously like a swastika. The
party has nonetheless skyrocketed to prominence in Greece in the
aftermath of EU-imposed austerity programs, which have bailed out
foreign speculators in Greek debt at the expense of the Greek
economy. The party, which was formed in the 1980s, came from
electoral nowhere to win seven percent of the votes in the 2012
Greek elections.

“In what appears to be Nazi salutes” but which really are not. Its
party logo looks a little like a swastika but is not. But the proof is in
the pudding and Golden Dawn enjoys popularity so it could not be
Nazi. Nazis, however, enjoyed popularity in Germany.

Its platform is clearly populist, anti-bailout, anti-immigration. Party
workers have made inroads in Greek society distributing food and
other assistance to a Greek population that has seen its formerly


southern European standard of living descend to third world level
existence with the smugly approving oversight of Brussels

It’s not really Nazi. It is populist, anti-austerity and nationalistic.
Its “Party Workers” are really nice people.

Two weeks ago, as Greece continues to implode, polls suggested
that the party had more than doubled its support to 15%, which
could well represent the difference between a minor party and a
significant factor in Greek politics. An earthquake looked to strike
the Greek political scene

There is no doubt about it, the Nazis are on the rise in Greece
and as Ron Paul’s popularity indicated, also in the United States.

So the powers that be in Greece, backed no doubt by Brussels and
Washington, had 22 party members arrested, including six Members
of the Greek Parliament and the party leader Nikos Mihaloliakos.
The party's offices were raided by the police throughout the country.

So a great injustice occurred when members of the Greek Nazi
Party were arrested. There was a conspiracy to stop Golden Dawn
from becoming more power by the EU and United States.

This is from the Nazi website Stormfront, “So this is how they
stifle the will of the Greek people? By stamping out and arresting
members of the one and only party that actually gives a damn about
the ordinary Greeks? I hope that the Greek people are paying
attention, and vote accordingly in the upcoming elections to remove
these anti-Greek bastards from power so that Golden Dawn, or it's
new incarnation, can take power and put control of the nation back
into the hands of the Greek people.”

“The Jew cannot operate, cannot infiltrate and distort our
culture without the Caucasian Capitalist sell out. The secret to
answering the Jewish question is very simple: The struggle for
existence and ultimately world domination, in the world today is

between two conflicting Wills-To Power, that of the Jew and the
Aryan. The Will-To-Power of the Jew is finance. The Will-To-Power
of the Aryan is war and discovery, summarized by what is called the
Faustian Instinct.”

The party was charged with operating a criminal enterprise,
including murder, assault, and money laundering. The precipitating
event was the murder of leftish Greek hip-hop singer Pavlos Fyssas
by suspected members of the Golden Dawn party. The murder was
the pretext for the frontal assault on the party.

The murder was another Reichstag Fire. In other words it was
carried out by Greek anti-Nazis to bring repression down on the
Greek Nazis.

As unappealing as the Golden Dawn appears to us, it seems rather
a stretch to arrest the leaders of a political party for the alleged
actions of its alleged members. Do we ask the political party
membership of murderers here in the US? Was Nidal Malik Hasan a
Republican or Democrat? It smacks of desperation.

“Unappealing?” the article spent numerous paragraphs praising
Golden Dawn. The Greeks have wiretap evidence linking the
leadership of Golden Dawn to the murder. These are not trumped
up charges.

Indeed it appears the Greek elite and their counterparts in Brussels
and elsewhere are beginning to notice that there are consequences
to their utter destruction of Greece, its economy, and its society. The
financial speculators who have been bailed out on the backs of the
working classes in Greece suddenly see a history lesson called

“Financial speculators” is a dog whistle term for Jews. The reference
to Versailles is revealing. It is Ron Paul’s belief that is was the terms
of the treaty of Versailles and not German militarism that justly


brought Hitler to power. He hopes the austerity imposed by the EU
will have similar consequences in Greece.

Will arresting the people who have been distributing food to the
starving in Greece reduce or inflame tensions in Greek society? Can
outlawing a political party without addressing the roots of its
extremist ideology produce desired results?

So all Golden Dawn is doing is distributing food to poor
Greeks? Is that all that Nazis do? The party is regularly described
as neo-Nazi by news media and academic sources, and members
are frequently responsible for anti-Semitic graffiti. Officially denying
that it has any connection to Neo-Nazism, the party admires Ioannis
Metaxas, the Greek general who established the 4th of August
regime, in Greece between 1936 and 1941.

Ilias Kasidiaris, a spokesman for Golden Dawn, wrote an article
that was published in Golden Dawn magazine on 20 April 2011, in
which he said: “What would the future of Europe and the whole
modern world be like if World War II (which the democracies, or in
fact the Jews – according to general Ioannis Metaxas – declared on
Germany) hadn't stopped the renewing route of National Socialism?
Certainly, fundamental values which mainly derive from ancient
Greek culture would be dominant in every state and would define
the fate of peoples. Romanticism as a spiritual movement and
classicism would prevail against the decadent subculture that
corroded the white man. Extreme materialism would have been
discarded, giving its place to spiritual exaltation.” In the same article,
Adolf Hitler is characterized as a great social reformer and military

In an article published in 1987 in the Golden Dawn magazine
titled "Hitler for 1000 years", its editor Michaloliakos showed his
support for Nazism and white supremacy. Specifically he wrote,
"We are the faithful soldiers of the National Socialist idea and
nothing else" and "[...] WE EXIST, and continue the battle, the battle


for the final victory of our race". He ends the article by writing "1987,
42 years later, with our thought and soul given to the last great
battle, with our thought and soul given to the black and red banners,
with our thought and soul given to the memory of our great Leader,
we raise our right hand up, we salute the Sun and with the courage,
that is compelled by our military honor and our National Socialist
duty we shout full of passion, faith to the future and our visions:
HEIL HITLER!" Furthermore he uses capital letters for pronouns
referring to Hitler ("by Himself", "His people").

On 17 August 1987, the war criminal Rudolf Hess, Adolf Hitler's
deputy in the Nazi Party, who was given a life sentence at
the Nuremberg Trials, committed suicide. The following day, on 18
August 1987, Golden Dawn members distributed proclamations in
the center of Athens with the phrase RUDOLF HESS IMMORTAL.

In pictures taken during the first congress of Golden Dawn in
February 1990, the congress hall is decorated with
the Swastika and the Wolfsangel.[126]

There are many cases in which Golden Dawn members have
appeared to give a Nazi salute. The founder of the party, Nikolaos
Michaloliakos, appeared to give a Nazi salute in the Athens city
council. He claims that it was merely "the salute of the national
youth organization of Ioannis Metaxas" The party states its logo is a
traditional Greek meander, not a Nazi symbol.

In May 2012, Golden Dawn ran in Greek elections under the
slogan "So we can rid this land of filth". On his post-election
statement, the leader, Nikolaos Michaloliakos, had placed a marble
eagle on an obvious position on his desk, which according to media
reports bears similarity to the eagle of the Nazi Third Reich. After
the elections, Eleni Zaroulia, a Golden Dawn MP, wore an iron
cross ring during her inauguration, a symbol which has been
associated with Nazism. As depicted in a picture taken on 14


September 2012, Panagiotis Iliopoulos, another Golden Dawn MP,
has a tattoo reading the Nazi greeting Sieg Heil.

On 23 July 2012, Artemis Matthaiopoulos, a member of Golden
Dawn, was elected as MP for the town of Serres. The website
(associated with SYRIZA), reported that Matthaiopoulos was the
frontman of the Nazi punk band "Pogrom" and pointed to the band's
song "Auschwitz" with anti-Semitic lyrics such as "fuck Anne Frank"
and "Juden raus".

Ilias Kasidiaris quoted the antisemitic hoax The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion in a speech to parliament on 23 October 2012.
Defending himself in a discussion on whether to lift his
parliamentary immunity over his assault of Kanelli, he quoted
Protocol 19: "In order to destroy the prestige of heroism we shall
send them for trial in the category of theft, murder and every kind of
abominable and filthy crime.”

Golden Dawn's leader, Nikolaos Michaloliakos, denied the
existence of gas chambers and ovens at Nazi extermination camps.
On 6 June 2013, the Golden Dawn MP Ilias Kasidiaris implied
during a stormy debate in the Greek Parliament that he is a
Holocaust denier.

Ironically the Golden Dawn party traces its ideological origins and
even personal and political ties directly to the leaders of the Greek
far-right junta that was spawned by CIA intervention and ruled the
country as a kind of anti-communist US client state from 1967-1974.

So how bad could this group be if the United States created them?

Troubles ahead for Europe, migrating from south to north. Outlawing
troubles will not make them disappear.



A report from Mark Weinhardt, a Des Moines lawyer serving as
independent counsel to the Iowa Senate Ethics Committee, finds
evidence that a top staffer in former U.S. Rep. Ron Paul’s 2012
presidential campaign attempted to pay former Iowa Sen. Kent
Sorenson to join the campaign in a manner that may violate several
federal election laws. The Paul campaign issue raised by the
Weinhardt report revolves around a $25,000 check written by Paul’s
deputy national campaign manager to a company owned by

The check was dated Dec. 26, 2011, and drawn on a Leesburg,
Va., jewelry store owned by the wife of Deputy National Campaign
Manager Dimitri Kesari. Sorenson never cashed that check. Such a
payment made in exchange for something of value to the Paul
campaign would likely qualify as an in-kind contribution, requiring
disclosure on the reports that the campaign files with the Federal
Election Commission. The $25,000 check was not reported,

The Weinhardt investigation also discovered that the majority of
the revenue paid to Sorenson’s Grassroots Strategy consulting firm
was from one entity, ICT Inc., a Maryland firm. ICT paid Sorenson
$73,000 from February 2012 through July of 2012. Weinhardt
called the wire transfers from ICT, “deeply suspicious.”

Date: 10/13/1995 Entity Type: Corporation File Number: 2551389
Company Age: 18 Years

Registered Agent:
Corpamerica, Inc.
2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400
Wilmington, DE 19808

Business Information
Location Type Single Location
State of Incorporation Maryland
Annual Revenue Estimate $48,000

SIC Code 899, Communications Services, NEC
NAICS Code 517919,
Employees 1

Weinhardt explained that the first payment from ICT in February
for $33,000 could represent a $25,000 payment to make up for the
check that Sorenson never cashed from Ron Paul’s Deputy National
Campaign Manager Dimitri Kesari, plus his first monthly payment of
$8,000. Additional payments were made to Sorenson in $8,000 or
$16,000 increments through late July of 2012.

Sorenson was extremely vague while being deposed by Weinhardt
about his financial dealings with ICT. What follows is the transcript
from Sorenson’s deposition regarding his dealings with ICT.

Weinhardt: Who is ICT, Inc.?

Sorenson: It’s somebody I consulted with. I believe they’re a
business out of New Jersey.

Weinhardt: And for whom or what was the consulting about?

Sorenson: I can’t go back and recollect entirely, but I know that
they’re a video consulting fime that produces videos for concerts,

Weinhardt: Do you see that ICT Inc. is incorporated in Hyattsville,

Sorenson: Yeah; but I believe he’s based out of New Jersey, his

Weinhardt: Who is “he”?

Sorenson: I believe – - I’m not sure if it was Nick or Sonny Spanio
(phonetic). I know I’m not pronouncing the name right. They’re

Weinhardt: Spell the last name for us the best you can.

Sorenson: I can’t. I can get that to you, I just don’t – - I struggle
spelling my own name.

Weinhardt: So what was the consulting work that you were doing for
Mr. Spanio?

Sorenson: I don’t think that’s relevant to the investigation.

Weinhardt: I think that it is, and I’m going to ask you to tell me the
answer to the question.

Sorenson: I’m not going to answer the question.

Weinhardt: Tell me what it was that you were doing for the income
that was paid from ICT to Grassroots Strategy?

Sorenson: General consulting on political and business issues.

Weinhardt: Consulting for what or for whom; in other works, who
was ICT’s ultimate client?

Sorenson: They have a lot of clients.

Weinhardt: I know. But what client were you doing work for?

Sorenson: I was doing work for ICT.

Weinhardt: I know. But what client of ICT were you doing work for?

Sorenson: Not a specific client. I was working for ICT.

Weinhardt: Describe your activities for ICT that resulted, to begin
with, in your getting $33,000 through Grassroots Strategies on
February 9th of 2012?

Sorenson: They asked me to consult them on political issues and
also locations for video shoots in Iowa that would appeal to a
fraction of Iowans.


Weinhardt: Do they have any client who was running for president
of the United States in 2012?

Sorenson: I can’t answer that. I mean. I don’t have the answer to

Weinhardt: What politicians, who were running in Iowa, were clients
of ICT?

Sorenson: I don’t have answers to those questions. I wasn’t privy to

Weinhardt: What was it that made you so valuable that they would
pay, I think, well over $60,000 over the course of 2012 to you?

Sorenson: I don’t know if you understand how this works, but they –
- had an interest in me possibly running for U.S. Senate in this
election cycle. I think if what had happened over the last twelve
months, I would probably be one of the front-runners right now; a lot
of people believe that. He asked me to come work for him. He
wanted to help make that happen.

Weinhardt: So who is “he”?

Sorenson: Sonny Spanio. But I can’t spell his last name.

Weinhardt: Do you have a cell phone number or an office number
for Mr. Spanio?

Sorenson: I do not.

Weinhardt: Do you have any contact information for him

Sorenson: Not on me, no; but I can – - I’m sure I can produce that.

Weinhardt: When you return for your deposition on Monday, could
you bring us all the contact information you have for Mr. Spanio?


Sorenson: I will.

Weinhardt: Let me ask this directly: Did the payments that
Grassroots Strategy received for or from ICT, Inc., have anything
whatsoever to do with the Ron Paul campaign?

Sorenson: No.

Weinhardt: Did they have anything to do with an identifiable
candidate that you know of?

Sorenson: No. Not that I know of.

Weinhardt: Did they have to do with any particular political issues
that you know of?

Sorenson: No. Well – - No. I mean, I know that they were – - they
were – - you know, they have a lot – - Listen, if you come to me I
can’t honestly answer that question, because do you think
somebody is from the far left is going to come ask me to help them?

Weinhardt: Well, my question is, there are organizations that are
motivated by particular issues, guns, gay marriage, taxes, things like
that. Is there some issue that ICT was interested in your – -

Sorenson: Not a specific issue.

Weinhardt: – - consulting about?

Sorenson: Not a specific issue.

Weinhardt: So let me understand your testimony. ICT paid you
initially $33,000 and then $8,000 a month for a number of months
for you to help them find locations for videos and things?

Sorenson: And also information on various voting blocks.


Weinhardt: But you never discussed and identifiable candidate or
identifiable issue, and it had nothing to do with anyone running for

Sorenson: No.

Weinhardt: And as you sit here today, you can’t remember the last
name of the person who paid you the money?

Sorenson: I told you the name, I don’t recall the spelling.

Weinhardt: Okay.

Sporer: Is it Spaniel, like the dog?

Sorenson: Spanio. It’s like, S-p-a-n-i-o, but I’m not sure.

Weinhardt: When were you first approached by this person Spanio?

Sorenson: The first time I met him, I believe, would have been in
2010. I believe so.

When Sorenson returned to Weinhardt’s law office to continue the
deposition four days later on 9/23/13, he informed Weinhardt that he
intended on invoke his 5th Amendment rights due to the ongoing
federal investigation.

Sorenson’s lack of information and knowledge regarding his own
financial dealings with ICT is odd considering that the money he
received from that client represents the largest single source of
revenue for him in 2011 and 2012. Are we really to believe that
someone who Sorenson can’t identify by name or by the state in
which they do business, offered him $73,000 out of the blue
because that person wants him to run for the United States Senate?

Are we also to believe that it’s just a coincidence that the $73,000
he received from ICT in 2012 just happens to equal an initial
payment of $25,000, plus six monthly installments at $8,000 a


month? That six months worth of compensation also just happens
to correspond with the timeframe that Ron Paul was still a candidate
for the president. The specific amount of $8,000 per month in
compensation also just happens to correspond with the Dorr
memo from August of 2011, which laid out Sorenson’s list of
demands in return for his support of Ron Paul.

While we don’t yet really know who or what ICT, Inc., we do know
that it is a business entity association with documentary film maker
Noel “Sonny” Izon. We also don’t know exactly how ICT may be
connected with Ron Paul’s political apparatus, but there seems to
be a connection that links ICT to Ron Paul’s Deputy National
Campaign Manager, Dimitri Kesari.

Pavlo Kesari, Dimitri’s brother, is Facebook friends with a Noel Izon
from Maryland. Izon’s Facebook profiles says that he works for the
AFL-CIO. A LexisNexis search found that Mr. Izon has a possible
email address of and links him to an address
in Hyattsville, Maryland. LexisNexis states that he is the manager of
Tropical Investments, the Pres of Interactive Communication
Technology (ICT, Inc.), and other film companies named An Open
Door Production and Scorpion Pictures, LLC.


Is it just another coincidence that Dimitri Kesari’s brother just
happens to be friends with the guy who paid Sorenson $73,000? I
highly doubt it.1


June 2013: Ron Paul claimed that NSA surveillance of private
American citizens is not necessary nor has it prevented as many
terrorism plots as officials claim it has. “I don’t really believe that
because I think they fudged the figures. Of those 50 plots that they
stopped, I think 40 were minor plots overseas, for all we know. So
they stretched the point. And even these hearings today were a bit
of a sham…because they had already decided what the results
would be. They have to try to justify their existence of destroying the
freedom of and the privacy of the American citizens, otherwise
they’re out of work. It’s sort of like the old story about you have to
burn the village to save the village. They want to burn the
Constitution to save the Constitution. And even today, [James] Cole,
the Deputy Attorney General says, the Fourth Amendment doesn’t
apply to this. Where did he get this brilliance to know when it applies
and when it doesn’t? If we can go to war and do all these other
things and throw the constitution out the window so casually, you

1. Researcher Craig Robinson serves as the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Prior to founding Iowa's largest conservative
news site, Robinson served as the Political Director of the Republican
Party of Iowa during the 2008 Iowa Caucuses. In that capacity, Robinson
planned and organized the largest political event in 2007, the Iowa Straw
Poll, in Ames, Iowa. Robinson also organized the 2008 Republican
caucuses in Iowa, and was later dispatched to Nevada to help with the
caucuses there. Robinson cut his teeth in Iowa politics during the 2000
caucus campaign of businessman Steve Forbes and has been involved
with most major campaigns in the state since then. His extensive political
background and rolodex give him a unique perspective from which to
monitor the political pulse of Iowa.


better be sure if you give them an inch, they’re going to take a mile
and paint themselves as heroes. The one thing they don’t do is ever
ask the motivation for people wanting to kill us. If we don’t ask that
question we can’t stop these problems by just taking more liberties
away from the American people. We’re going in the opposite way.
We’ve taken away the constitution; we’re supposed to be fighting to
save the constitution. It’s completely turned on its head.”

How in the heck does Ron Paul know how many terrorist plots
the NSA thwarted? Does he have an agent like Snowden inside the
NSA? He says 40 were minor plots overseas. What constitutes a
minor terrorist plot that according to Paul should be ignored in favor
of privacy? Ten people getting killed overseas? Is that a minor
terrorist plot? He says that the motivation of those who work at NSA
is purely pecuniary rather than patriotic so they have to invent
enemies to collect a paycheck. He and Snowden are the traitors
while those at NSA follow the Constitution and the Patriot Act which
allows the Government to put a pen register on a phone without a
warrant which is essentially what NSA did. But the main subtext
here is the line “The one thing they don’t do is ever ask the
motivation for people wanting to kill us.” Israel is that motivation and
if we cut off military aid to Israel or work to destroy it all our terrorist
problems with radical Islam will evaporate. Ron Paul wishes to
security strip America so that a horrendous terrorist attack will occur
that can be blamed on American support of Israel or on Israel itself
since the Nazis have learned a new phrase, “false flag operation.”


The Pauloids came down hard on this book when they pretended to
review it on Amazon. There are no verified purchases. This was a
half-decent review.



J. Weberman is a notorious gadfly, self-proclaimed expert on
Bob Dylan's garbage and researcher into the conspiracy
surrounding the JFK assassination. He is also a member of both the
Yippies and the Jewish Defense Organization (a somewhat less
extreme version of the Jewish Defense League, but still too much
for the ADL). Weirdly, the only critical book on libertarian
presidential candidate Ron Paul is written by this strange character.
If you're looking for a balanced, scholarly account of the interfaces
between libertarianism, conservative populism and Dixiecrat racism,
you won't find it here.

Weberman sets the stage already at page one: "Ron Paul is no
libertarian; he is a crypto-Nazi. Crypto-Nazism is a term implying a
secret support for, or admiration of, the genocidal political and
economic system invented by Adolf Hitler." Further: "This book rips
the cloak of deception off of Ron Paul and expose his true
pathological genocidal self, a Nazi swine without a swastika. (...) He
was, and is, a clever calculating Liberty Lobby / Spotlight type Nazi,
a Nazi without a swastika, bent on the mass murder of the Jewish
people and on sending the Blacks home to Africa. (...) That is why
Ron Paul, like the Spotlight scum that created him, is determined to
create a situation where millions of Jews are murdered. He is a filthy
Nazi pig and he must be stopped."

Ron Paul's admirers have rejected Weberman's garbology out
of hand. Should we? I'm less sure. Behind all the rhetoric, typos and
irrelevant digressions, Alan "Jew" Weberman does present some
pretty disturbing information on both Paul himself and his allies (or
would-be allies).


Paul had friendly relations with Spotlight, the publication of
Willis Carto's Liberty Lobby, which is indeed a Nazi front group. In
1985, Paul began to publish newsletters, which were heavily
advertised in Spotlight. Recently, Paul admitted that he had ghost
writers, but who were they? The usual speculation is Lew Rockwell,
a former Paul associate and founder of the Ludwig von Mises
Institute. He has denied involvement, and Weberman believes that
the real ghost writer might have been Willis Carto himself! The
political line of the newsletters does seem similar to the line of
Liberty Lobby: "pro-German" statements, defence of Nazi war
criminals, support for David Duke, racist slurs against Blacks,
conspiracy theories about Israel, etc, etc. Small wonder Paul
decades later revealed that he never wrote his own newsletter - but
that simply raises the question why he didn't stop its publication.
Didn't he knew the opinions of the ghost writers? Didn't he knew his
own employees?

Among would-be supporters of Paul, not necessarily endorsed
by him, are overt White supremacists, Muslim fundamentalists
(including our old friend Yousef al-Khattab), Nation of Islam, Lyndon
LaRouche, a few leftists and even a few Jews, including the
inevitable Neturei Karta. Of course, Weberman believes that Paul is
in on it all. Nor does Weberman like Lew Rockwell, Murray Rothbard
or Ludwig von Mises, whom he claims are fascists, racists and/or
self-hating Jews. My sick sense of humour was properly satisfied by
the chapter in which Weberman exposes various individual
weirdoes who (for reasons all their own) supported Paul's recent
candidacy. There's Aakash Dalal and Anthony Graziano, suspected
of fire-bombing a synagogue and the home of a rabbi. Further, we
have Anson Chi who was seriously injured by a homemade bomb,
and Adam Kokesh who was interrogated by the Secret Service after
implicitly supporting death threats against Mitt Romney on the air.
Not to be outdone, a certain Douglas Wright (who had Ron Paul
literature in his home) was charged with attempting to blow up a
local branch of the Federal Reserve...


Weberman devotes almost half his book attacking Paul's
isolationism, which the author believes is really directed against the
State of Israel. He claims that Paul's proposals to cut "all" foreign
aid would weaken Israel's defences against the Arab states and
Iran, thus setting the stage for the destruction of the Jewish state.
Paul once sponsored a bill to end all aid to Egypt, Israel, Jordan and
Pakistan. He voted no to sanctions against Iran, doesn't seem to
regard Iran as a threat, and even seems to believe that they have
the right to build nuclear weapons if they so choose. Instead, Paul
has condemned Saudi Arabia, attempting to link them with
international terrorism. (Weberman is soft on the Saudis, which -
ironically - could also be a controversial position if you're a Zionist!)
The author links Paul to one Michael Scheuer, a high-ranking CIA
operative who Weberman believes was really an "Islamist
ideological mole" and a "Jew-hater", responsible for protecting
Osama bin-Laden in the years leading up to 9/11. After leaving the
CIA, Scheuer have apparently become a vocal critic of the U.S.-
Israeli alliance.

Given the traditional animosity between Jews and Blacks in the
United States, it's interesting to note that Weberman takes pro-
Black positions in his book, presumably because he views African-
Americans as potential allies against Paul. On some questions, the
author sounds liberal: he supports affirmative action, welfare
systems and HUDs. On the War on Drugs, he takes a
"conservative" position, i.e. he supports the war on drugs and
opposes legalization. However, this too is "pro-Black" since it was
also the position taken by the Congressional Black Caucus due to
the crack epidemic in poor Black neighbourhoods. By contrast, Ron
Paul opposes liberal programs, while supporting the legalization of
drugs. In Weberman's opinion, this means genocide of Blacks.
Something tells me this pro-Black orientation cannot possibly be the
real program of the Jewish Defense Organization...


Well, I *did* say the author is a gadfly, didn't I?

My final opinion of "Ron Paul: America's Most Dangerous Nazi"
is that the book, while perhaps garbologically extreme and
somewhat disingenuous, nevertheless does raise some disturbing
questions about Ron Paul's past and present politics. Perhaps one
day a balanced, scholarly study will be published about the difficult
interface between libertarianism, conservative populism and
Dixiecrat racism?


Having a Nazi like Ron Paul as a Presidential candidate was
deleterious to America. His constant efforts to make America more
vulnerable to a terrorist attack by hamstringing the NSA, CIA and
FBI have finally paid off when one of his Paulbots, Edward
Snowden, who, despite lack of a formal education, was able to
infiltrate the NSA and steal documents which he turned over to
Glenn Greenwald, a gay Jewish traitor who was the in house
attorney to The Church of the Creator, a Nazi organization headed


by Matt Hale. Greenwald read coded messages the Hale’s mother
smuggled out of prison to members of Hale’s crew. The FBI found
out this and as a result he had to give up practicing law.

Snowden told the Guardian that he supported a third-party
candidate for president in 2008.

Snowden did become a traitor at the behest of a foreign
government such as China; he did it on behalf of Ron Paul. Paul
had manipulated him into thinking that doing so was the right thing
to do for “libertarian” reasons and constitutional grounds.

The brainwashing worked. This kid never even graduated High
School so his education came from his hero, Ron Paul. But Ron
Paul’s motivation was to weaken the United States Government and
its intelligence community so that another 9/11 type terrorist attack
can take place and be blamed on America’s support of Israel or
deemed a “false flag operation” by the Israelis. If the devastation is
far reaching enough who knows what people might think? Ron Paul
is a traitor whose loyalty is to Nazism. What kind of a former
Congressman would praise someone guilty of treason and
espionage against his own country? Paul:

The Fourth Amendment is clear; we should be
secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects,
and all warrants must have probable cause. Today
the government operates largely in secret, while
seeking to know everything about our private lives –
without probable cause and without a warrant. The
government does not need to know more about what
we are doing. We need to know more about what the
government is doing. We should be thankful for
individuals like Edward Snowden and Glenn
Greenwald who see injustice being carried out by
their own government and speak out, despite the
risk. They have done a great service to the American


people by exposing the truth about what our
government is doing in secret.

The constitutionalist Ron Paul cherry-picked and omitted the
treason clause:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only
in levying War against them, or in adhering to their
Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person
shall be convicted of Treason unless on the
testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or
on Confession in open court.

Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), called the NSA PRISM program,
"an all-out assault on the Constitution." Isn’t what Snowden did a
violation of the constitution? If you take Paul’s belief to its logical
end in a Paul Presidency leaking documents would be legal and all
of America’s secrets exposed to its enemies. Any disgruntled
employee or ex-employee could leak documents and claim to be a
whistle-blower rather than a criminal. Chaos would ensue. But isn’t
this what Ron Paul wants, chaos like that in the Weimer Republic
giving the Nazis a chance to blame it on the Jews and seize power?


The first donation from the traitor Snowden to the Paul
campaign came from an address in Columbia, Md., in March 2012,
while the second came from Waipahu, Hawaii, two months later.
The first contribution describes the donor as an employee of Dell, a
company Snowden has done contract work for in recent years.
Snowden is from Maryland, and most recently for Booz Allen
Hamilton in Hawaii. In addition, Snowden told the Guardian that he
supported a third-party candidate for president in 2008.


Snowden believes the Boston Bombing was a criminal act, not
an act of terrorism: "We have to decide why terrorism is a new
threat. There has always been terrorism. Boston was a criminal act.
It was not about surveillance but good, old-fashioned police work.
The police are very good at what they do."

Ron Paul: “While the media crowed that the apprehension of
the suspects was a triumph of the new surveillance state – and,
predictably, many talking heads and Members of Congress called
for even more government cameras pointed at the rest of us – the
fact is none of this caught the suspect. Actually, it very nearly gave
the suspect a chance to make a getaway.”

Snowden was a Arabist and said he became disillusioned with
the Armed Forces after he heard other soldiers “getting pumped up
over killing Arabs.”


"I'm worried about somebody in our government might kill him
with a cruise missile or a drone missile. I mean, we live in a bad
time where American citizens don't even have rights and that they
can be killed, but the gentlemen is trying to tell the truth about
what's going on. He's not defecting; there are no signs of that
happening. It’s a shame that we are in an age where people who tell
the truth about what the government is doing gets into trouble. No, I
don't think for a minute that he's a traitor.” What are the odds of
Obama ordering a drone strike on Edward Snowden? Is it in the

realm of possibility or is Ron Paul tapping the vast reservoir of
ignorance in America as Hitler did in Germany.

Snowden is giving the Chinese classified documents. In a
interview with a Government controlled Chinese newspaper he
revealed the the US National Security Agency’s controversial Prism
program extends to people and institutions in Hong Kong and
mainland China. Snowden said that according to unverified
documents seen by the South China Post, the NSA had been
hacking computers in Hong Kong and on the mainland since 2009.
None of the documents revealed any information about Chinese
military systems, he said. One of the targets in the SAR, according
to Snowden, was Chinese University and public officials, businesses
and students in the city. The documents also point to hacking
activity by the NSA against mainland targets. Snowden believed
there had been more than 61,000 NSA hacking operations globally,
with hundreds of targets in Hong Kong and on the mainland. “We
hack network backbones – like huge internet routers, basically –
that give us access to the communications of hundreds of
thousands of computers without having to hack every single one,”
he said.2

According to Senator Lindsey Graham the biggest threat to
U.S. intelligence these days is young men like Snowden and Private
Bradley Manning, who is accused of leaking a trove of national
security documents published by Wikileaks. “I think that there’s a
group of people, younger people who are not fighting the war, who
are libertarians mostly, who feel like the government is the problem,”
Graham said, “that those who are trained to defend us are a bigger
threat than those who are trying to attack us. If somebody finally
goes to jail for destroying our national security and weakening our
national defenses, maybe the next 29-year-old who thinks that



they’re going to be some cult figure will think twice. If we can run
[Snowden] down, it’s imperative that we catch him. I don’t care
where he goes, I don’t care what we need to do, we need to bring
this guy to justice for deterrence sake.”

Senator Graham wondered whether young "libertarian" types
could be trusted to serve in classified positions when they proved
that they weren't keen on the strategy. Graham was asked if
Snowden's donations to Ron Paul were the sort of warning signs
vetters should have looked out for. "No, no," said Graham. "I think
people that give donations to Ron Paul are exercising their right to
participate in the political process. Ron Paul isn't a threat to
America. His policies are."

This is another reason why Ron Paul is the most dangerous
Nazi in America in or out of office. He inspired a traitor to weaken
our defense against terrorism. PRISM was successfully used to stop
a harmful attack on American citizens. House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) said the NSA
surveillance successfully stopped a terrorist attack “within the last
few years.” PRISM stopped a terror attack on the NYC subway.
Najibullah Zazi was captured by the Feds when an Al Qaeda email
was traced back to his computer, thanks to the massive data mining
the NSA is doing.

The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA).
CISPA proponents claim that the legislation is necessary to protect
Americans from foreign “cyber terrorists,” but the real effect of this
bill will be to further erode Americans’ online privacy.

Under CISPA, Internet corporations are authorized to hand over
the private information of American citizens to federal agents, as
long as they can justify the violation of your privacy in the name of
protecting “cyber security”. Among the items that may be shared are
your e-mails, browsing history, and online transactions.


Since Ron Paul considered Snowden a hero it comes as no
surprise that he opposes legislation that would make it easier to
catch people like him. Paul:

Like the PATRIOT Act, CISPA violates the fourth
amendment by allowing federal agencies to obtain
private information without first seeking a warrant
from a federal judge. The law also allows federal
agencies to pass your information along to other
federal bureaucrats — again without obtaining a
warrant. And the bill provides private companies with
immunity from lawsuits regardless of the damage
done to anyone whose personal information is
shared with the government.


In April 2013 when Ron Paul announced a
new online curriculum for home-school-ers, he
named Gary North as director of curriculum
development. North, 71, is not a professional
educator. He is a leading theorist of Christian
Reconstructionism, a Christian Identity spinoff
movement that denounces democracy, thinks some forms of slavery
are OK and wants to impose a draconian version of biblical law that
prescribes the death penalty for gays, adulterers, blasphemers,
witches and incorrigible children, among others. In a 2003 column,
Paul wrote, “The notion of a rigid separation between church and
state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the
writings of our Founding Fathers.”3 North’s theocracy has all the
markings of a Nazi-like regime; however Paul tries to obscure this
by attacking one facet of Nazi education:



A common feature of authoritarian regimes is the criminalization of
alternatives to government-controlled education. Dictators recognize
the danger that free thought poses to their rule, and few things
promote the thinking of “unapproved” thoughts like an education
controlled by parents instead of the state. That is why the National
Socialist (Nazi) government of Germany outlawed homeschooling in

Since Ron Paul is supplying the curriculum for home education
it is going to be him controlling the education rather than the State
and those “unapproved thoughts” or “politically incorrect” thoughts
such as those in found his newsletters would be used to inculcate
children. Paul:

Unlike the top-down model of nationalized education,
the homeschool curriculum is designed to encourage
maximum input from parents and students. While the
curriculum will reflect my belief, and interest, in
Austrian economics, libertarian political theory, and
the history of the struggle against state power, the
curriculum is being carefully designed to not show
bias toward any one religion. I hope all parents of any
faith—or no religious belief at all—will feel
comfortable using the curriculum.

“Austrian economics, libertarian political theory, and the history of
the struggle against state power” fascist economics, Nazi political
theory and the history of the “struggle” as in Mein Kampf (My
Struggle) of Hitler and Nazi Germany.



Here Ron Paul intimates that the Federal Government staged
this event as a practice drill for martial law.

Liberty Was Also Attacked in Boston by Ron Paul

Forced lockdown of a city.

Militarized police riding tanks in the streets. Door to door armed
searches without warrant. Families thrown out of their homes at
gunpoint to be searched without probable cause. Businesses forced
to close. Transport shut down. These were not the scenes from a
military coup in a far off banana republic, but rather the scenes just
over a week ago in Boston as the United States got a taste of
martial law.

This was not martial law. There was no curfew. Most people
were happy to go through what they had to go through in order to
avoid becoming a victim of Islamist terror.

The ostensible reason for the military-style takeover of parts of
Boston was that the accused perpetrator of a horrific crime was on
the loose.

Note the use of the word “ostensible.” Represented or
appearing as such; ostensive: His ostensible purpose was charity,
but his real goal was popularity. A terrorist on the loose was not the
real reason for the lockdown. What was the real reason?

The Boston bombing provided the opportunity for the
government to turn what should have been a police investigation
into a military-style occupation of an American city. This
unprecedented move should frighten us as much or more than the
attack itself.

So three people dying, numerous other’s crippled for life, many
deafened, hundreds seriously injured is less frightening than a
comprehensive police dragnet for the perpetrators.

What has been sadly forgotten in all the celebration of the
capture of one suspect and the killing of his older brother is that the
police state tactics in Boston did absolutely nothing to catch them.

An outright lie. Everyone was on alert and when someone saw
that the covering on their boat had been disturbed they called

While the media crowed that the apprehension of the suspects
was a triumph of the new surveillance state – and, predictably,
many talking heads and Members of Congress called for even more
government cameras pointed at the rest of us – the fact is none of
this caught the suspect. Actually, it very nearly gave the suspect a
chance to make a getaway.

The police were able to accurately identify the terrorist by
piecing together numerous videos. This is another outright lie but
what do you expect from a crypto-Nazi?

The “shelter in place” command imposed by the governor of
Massachusetts was lifted before the suspect was caught. Only after
this police state move was ended did the owner of the boat go
outside to check on his property, and in so doing discover the
Liar. He said he saw it from his window. “Like all Watertown
residents, Henneberry stayed in his Franklin Street home as the
hunt for Tsarnaev paralyzed much of eastern Massachusetts on
Friday. When he looked out the window at his boat at one point

during the day, he noticed something was amiss. "I put pads
between the shrink wrap, and it stopped the chaffing and two of
those had fallen down to the ground. It was really windy, so I didn't
think twice about it," he said.”4

No, the suspect was not discovered by the paramilitary troops
terrorizing the public. He was discovered by a private citizen, who
then placed a call to the police. And he was identified not by
government surveillance cameras, but by private citizens who
willingly shared their photographs with the police.

The troops were protecting the public, the terrorists were
terrorizing the public. The police in this case was the FBI. Of course
the Federal Government does not have cameras in Boston.

As journalist Tim Carney wrote last week: “Law enforcement in
Boston used cameras to ID the bombing suspects, but not police
cameras. Instead, authorities asked the public to submit all photos
and videos of the finish-line area to the FBI, just in case any of them
had relevant images. The surveillance videos the FBI posted online
of the suspects came from private businesses that use surveillance
to punish and deter crime on their property.”

So the police cameras did not get a good shot of the suspects.
Most are used for traffic control, not crime. The photos would have
been worthless if not for the skill of the FBI, which Paul wants to

Sadly, we have been conditioned to believe that the job of the
government is to keep us safe, but in reality the job of the
government is to protect our liberties. Once the government decides
that its role is to keep us safe, whether economically or physically,



they can only do so by taking away our liberties. That is what
happened in Boston.

Liberty is worthless if you are dead. Anyway Paul’s idea of
liberty is the freedom to kill Jews and segregate Blacks or send
them back to Africa. He wants to see more terrorist attacks take
place in America as he basically hates the U.S. which he believes is
controlled by ZOG, the Zionist Occupational Government. He will
never say this openly but this is his sick mindset.

Three people were killed in Boston and that is tragic. But what
of the fact that over 40 persons are killed in the United States each
day, and sometimes ten persons can be killed in one city on any
given weekend? These cities are not locked-down by paramilitary
police riding in tanks and pointing automatic weapons at innocent

Note how Paul fails to mention those who lost their legs,
hearing and more. Over 200. BUT? BUT? He qualifies this tragedy
He is the lowest scum on earth.

This is unprecedented and is very dangerous. We must
educate ourselves and others about our precious civil liberties to
ensure that we never accept demands that we give up our
Constitution so that the government can pretend to protect us.

Pretend to protect us? They rounded up the Islamist scum
before they could set their bombs off in Times Square. Paul would
have loved to see NYC attacked because of all the Jews there.



Ron Paul has cleverly chosen certain figures from academia,
the media and the CIA who further his totalitarian political goal.
These individuals are all pieces in a puzzle that when assembled
displays a swastika.

John Laughland, a British writer who is a prominent defender of
the late Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic. Laughland has also
defended Ukraine’s Kremlin-backed president Viktor Yanukovich
whose attempt to steal the 2004 election sparked that country’s
peaceful “Orange Revolution”. He lamented the fate of Belarusian
President Alexander Lukashenko, Europe’s last dictator. The
common thread is totalitarianism and its intellectual justification as in
Mein Kampf.


Oxford historian Mark Almond: A trustee of a sinister and
deceptively named organization, the British Helsinki Human Rights
Group (BHHRG), which trades on the good name of the
international civil liberties monitoring organizations founded as a
result of the 1975 Helsinki accords. The BHHRG was an early
defender of Milosevic and Serbian behavior in the Balkans
generally. The BHHRG hates gypsies just as the Nazis did.

Judge Andrew Napolitano, a former legal analyst for Fox News who
has said that “It’s hard for me to believe that [7 World Trade Center]
came down by itself” and that the 9/11 attacks “couldn’t possibly
have been done the way the government told us.” Ron Paul is the
new Hitler and he is the new Mussolini.

The Nazi Willis Carto is a fan of Judge Andrew Napolitano
and this appeared on his website.

Focusing on FBI claims that since 9-11 it has foiled
multiple alleged terrorist plots to kill Americans,
Napolitano pointed out that while there were some 20

such incidents, three were interrupted by private
citizens who observed suspicious activity. But the
remaining 17 that were “solved” by the feds all had a
common and reprehensible thread: They were
planned, plotted, controlled and carried out by the
federal government itself. Not unlike the 1993 first
attack on the World Trade Center, the FBI had
agents or informants befriend young Muslim men by
luring them into cooperation with encouragement
about being “like-minded” and anti-American. Then,
of course, they were arrested before any damage
could be done—followed by great hoopla the next
day. Napolitano also tackled Israel’s prime role in
promoting a United States war against Iran, and this
may have been the final straw for those signing his
paycheck. The judge’s final guest and source of
information was Michael Scheuer, the former chief of
the CIA’s Osama bin Laden-watching unit. While
Scheuer accepts the U.S. government claim that bin
Laden was the architect of 9-11, a point many
researchers reject, he is a courageous critic of Israel
and its U.S. lobby and, as Napolitano’s guest,
pointed out that a war against Iran benefits Israel and
Saudi Arabia but not the United States.

Eric Margolis who says that “conclusive proof still lacks” connecting
Osama bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks and has speculated that the
events could have been “a plot by America’s far right or by Israel or
a giant cover-up.” Eric Margolis is the son of Henry Margolis, a
Jewish American industrialist, and Nexhmie Zaimi, an Albanian
Muslim journalist. Margolis supports the Islamic Caucasian Emirate

that perpetrated the Boston Massacre. Margolis is a supporter of
terrorism and has been singled out by Al Qaeda as some who can
be trusted. He characterizes Hamas and Islamic Jihad as
“Palestinian resistance groups” whose sole objective is to resist
Israeli occupation, not menace America. This despite the fact that
Margolis is undoubtedly well aware that the stated goal of both
Hamas and Islamic Jihad is the total destruction of Israel and its
replacement with a radical Muslim theocracy. Under this genocidal
scenario, Israeli Jews would be slaughtered and their survivors
forced to live under the brutal rule of their new Islamist overlords.

Southwestern Law School professor Butler Shaffer, in an article for
Rockwell’s site titled, “9/11 Was a Conspiracy,” asks, “In light of the
lies, forgeries, cover-ups, and other deceptions leading to a ‘war’ in
Iraq, how can any intellectually honest person categorically deny
the possibility of the involvement of American political interests in
9/11?” The current practice of accusing the Iranian government of
warlike intentions in order to rationalize one's own desires to attack
that country is one example.

Shaffer blames Israel and America for 9/11, not the Islamists. “Our
wartime suffering is causally connected with the suffering we inflict
upon others. If we are to understand the nature of our blood-stained
world, we must abandon our self-righteous definitions of “good” and
“evil” and see our problems in terms of their interconnectedness.
Only fools will accept the “they hate us for our freedom and our
values” rationale for this war. The reality is that others hate us for


the wrongs our government has inflicted upon them; and we hate
those who retaliate against us for such wrongs.

Walter Block, an neo-Confederate Jewish professor of economics
and fellow at the Mises Institute. He is the mentally ill Jew who has
replaced Murray Rothbard as the Jew the crypto-Nazis keep around
for laughs. Block is nuts and his writing makes little sense. Here he
defends the rights of the Muslims to threaten the artists who did
caricatures of Mohammad.

However, there is a plethora of other instances where
this is not at all true. For example, suppose some
cartoons were published that did not depict
Muhammad in an unflattering light, but, rather, blacks
with big lips shuffling along or tap dancing, Jews with
long noses looking avaricious and holding bags of
money, or hordes of Orientals with a "yellow menace"
caption. If anything is clear, it is that in most western
nations such caricatures would be deemed
"hate speech" and their authors clapped into prison
forthwith. The same applies to the use of such words
as "nigger," "kike," "spic," "chink," "wop," "greaser,"
"cunt," when used in an attempt to denigrate certain
favored groups of people. ("Honky" would not likely
result in the same fate.) And what of holocaust
denial? In many "progressive" nations denying this
historical event, or making fun of it, is a violation of
law. David Irving now languishes in an Austrian
prison for engaging in his free speech rights on this
topic. An Islamic group in Holland posted a cartoon
of Hitler and Ann Frank in bed with each other; but


for the present conflagration, this would have likely
resulted in a jail sentence for them.

An argument has been made by Kathleen Parker that
there is a dis-analogy here. She says: "… the Nazis
… were officially sanctioned enforcers of immoral
social orders that used caricature to further degrade
and dehumanize beleaguered minorities they
ultimately murdered. There is no equivalence
between organized murder on behalf of a malignant
social system and a-half-dozen nerdy artists,
speaking only for themselves, lampooning a fanatical
religious sect…"

But David Irving is not a Nazi. He murdered no one.
He merely engaged in press freedom, or free speech.
The same applies to those who use the racial and
sexual expletives mentioned above. Yes, great evil
was perpetrated by those who used this denigrating
language, and by those who sported Nazi regalia.
The Nazis murdered millions (the Communists
murdered tens of millions; when Prince Harry donned
the swastika he was roundly condemned; had he
treated the hammer and sickle in a similar manner, it
would have passed unremarked, but that is another
story). But it is still a logical fallacy to claim that all
who adopt their regalia, mannerisms, goose-
stepping, etc., are equally guilty; even that they are
guilty of any crime at all. In my own opinion, just as in
the case of prostitution, pornography, addictive
drugs, these are not nice things; but from the
libertarian perspective they are victimless crimes and
should not be punished by law, or through extra-legal
sanctions: rioting.


Michael Scheuer, a former CIA intelligence officer, who blames
Israel for Islamism. Block and Scheuer are covered in this book.

Leverett has challenged Western conventional wisdom on the
Islamic Republic of Iran’s foreign policy and internal politics,
documented the historical record of previous Iranian cooperation
with the United States, and presented the seminal argument in
American foreign policy circles for a U.S.-Iranian “grand bargain”.
His new book, Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come
to Terms with the Islamic Republic (also co-authored with Hillary
Mann Leverett), will be published in 2012.


The Yale Initiative for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-
Semitism (YIISA) was founded in 2006. Its purpose was to provide a
scholarly approach to the study of contemporary and historical anti-
Semitism. It was attached to Yale's Institution of Social and Policy
Studies. It was fully funded from private contributions. Deputy
Provost and Political Science Professor Frances Rosenbluth served
on the faculty committee that reviewed YIISA's performance and
concluded that the university should close the center. In recent
years Rosenbluth appointed Iran-regime apologists Flynt and Hillary
Mann Leverett to serve as senior fellows at Yale's Jackson Institute
for Global Affairs. Last September the Leveretts brought their
students to New York to hold a seminar for them with Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Unlike the YIISA conference, the
move did not stimulate any significant controversy at the university.

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson Blasts 'Politicized' U.S. Intelligence on
Syria, Raises Prospect of Obama Impeachment

Austrian economist Professor Robert Higgs in a recent talk narrates
of how US president Franklin D. Roosevelt baited the Japanese into


attacking the US that paved way for America’s participation in World
War II.

Who knows why Paul dug up this retread but she might still
have some connection to the Intelligence Community. Ron Paul
knows every facet of American society that exhibits Jew hating
tendencies and he is determined to unite them.


On March 11, 2012, according to the Center
For Public Integrity, the Committee to Re-Elect
Ron Paul donated $150,000 to the Foundation
for Rational Economics and Education, a
nonprofit group Paul himself founded in 1976,
according to documents filed with the Federal
Election Commission. Carol Paul, his wife, is the
group's president, IRS documents show. By law,
political campaign committees may contribute
unlimited surplus funds to 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofits such as
the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education, and there's


no prohibition on a former candidate directing those funds to his or
her own charity. Although Ron’s Paul’s wife gets no salary his
daughter, Lori Pyeatt gets 60K a year for doing nothing.

Internal Revenue Code Section 4958. Taxes on excess benefit
transactions: Disqualified Persons

(4) Family members
The members of an individual's family shall be determined under
section 4946(d); except that such members also shall include the
brothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half blood) of the
individual and their spouses.


Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi and in office or out of office he is a
threat. He is not much of a doctor, and will never make any great
advances in medicine as others, such as Louis Pasteur, have. But
Ron Paul thinks he knows better than Pasteur. Despite scientific
evidence that raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms that
can pose serious health risks in 2013 Paul tacitly recommended raw
milk to his zombies. On May 11, 2011 Paul introduced H.R. 1830, a
bill that would effectively overturn the federal prohibition on raw milk
for human consumption in interstate commerce. Paul, who had
introduced the same bill in the previous session of Congress
remarked, “Hard as it is to believe, the federal government is
actually spending time and money prosecuting small businesses for
the “crime” of meeting their customer’s demand for unpasteurized
milk! Americans have the right to consume these products without
having the federal government second-guess their judgment about
what products best promote health.” According to an analysis by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between 1993

and 2006 more than 1500 people in the United States became sick
from drinking raw milk or eating cheese made from raw milk. In
addition, CDC reported that unpasteurized milk is 150 times more
likely to cause food-borne illness and results in 13 times more
hospitalizations than illnesses involving pasteurized dairy products.
This is Paul’s latest Nazi newsletter:


by Ron Paul

While I oppose most gun control proposals, there is
one group of Americans I do believe should be
disarmed: federal agents. The use of force by federal
agents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is
one of the major, albeit overlooked, threats to liberty.
Too often Americans are victimized by government
force simply for engaging in commercial transactions
disproved of by Congress and the federal

Of course Paul wants to disarm Federal Agents. He is a neo-
Confederate who opposes a strong central government. And who
decides if these laws are unjust, unconstitutional and a threat to
liberty? The Courts? No Ron Paul does. He will decide if the laws
are a threat to his version of liberty, “liberty” to commit genocide.

For example, the offices of Rawesome Foods in
Venice, California, have been repeatedly raided by
armed federal and state agents, and Rawesome’s
founder, 65-year old James Stewart, has been
imprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action?
Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk and
cheese to willing customers – in a state where raw
milk is legal! You cannot even drink milk from a cow
without a federal permit!


James Stewart jumped bail, having failed
to show up for two court appearances. In one
of cases, he was out on a $30,000 bail in Los
Angeles County on charges of illegally selling
raw milk. In the other, he was out of a
$100,000 bail in Ventura County on charges of
illegally raising funds for Sharon Palmer’s Healthy Family Farms,
according to an article in The Complete Patient. Stewart was into
the notion of the ‘sovereign man,’ which urges people to claim their
‘Common Law Inherent Rights’ and defend themselves against “all
levels of abuse from Government and Statutes.” Sharon Palmer
supplies Rawesome Foods with raw goat milk and other dairy
products from what is known as a ‘herdshare.’ Under a herdshare
arrangement, the members don’t consider themselves as buying the
milk since they own the animals. Palmer has no license to sell raw
milk in California, a state which does allow retail sales of raw milk
but which also has very strict laws governing raw-milk production
and sales.

This is hardly the only case of federal agents using
force against those who would dare meet consumer
demand for raw milk. In 2011 armed agents of the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raided the
business of Pennsylvanian Amish farmer Dan
Allgyer. Federal agents wasted a whole year and
who knows how many millions of our tax dollars
posing as customers in order to stop Allgyer from
selling his raw milk to willing customers.

On February 2, 2012 Federal District Court Judge Lawrence F.
Stengel ordered a permanent injunction against dairy farmer Dan
Allgyer prohibiting Allgyer from distributing raw milk and raw milk
products across state lines; under Judge Stengel’s order, the
injunction was to be in place for a minimum of five years Stengel
found that Allgyer sold raw milk to members of Grassfed On The
Hill, a food buyers club, at various distribution points in Maryland


and the District of Columbia in violation of federal labeling laws (the
milk containers Allgyer distributed were unlabeled) and the federal
regulation prohibiting raw milk and raw milk products (other than raw
cheese aged at least 60 days) in interstate commerce. As a result
Allgyer closed down his operation.

The use of force against individuals making choices
not approved of by the political elite does not just
stop with raw milk. The Natural News website has
documented numerous accounts of federal
persecution, including armed raids, of health food
stores and alternative medical practitioners.

The Nazi newspaper Spotlight, that supported Ron Paul ran
stories like Peroxide for Improved Health by T. Valentine, an
interview with Fr. Richard Willhelm, SPOTLIGHT, August, 1986.
They advertisers were the purveyors of quack cures.

These type of police state tactics used against,
among others, raw milk producers, and alternative
health providers is justified by the paternalistic
attitude common in Washington, D.C. A member of

Congress actually once told me that, “The people
need these types of laws because they do not know
what is good for them.” This mindset fuels the growth
of the nanny state and inevitably leads to what C.S.
Lewis said may be the worst from of tyranny “…a
tyranny exercised for the good of its victims.”

All Americans, even if they do not believe it is a wise
choice to drink raw milk should be concerned about
the use of force to limit our choices. This is because
there is no limiting principle to the idea that the
government force is justified if used “for our own
good.” Today it is those who sell raw milk who are
being victimized by government force, tomorrow it
could be those who sell soda pop or Styrofoam cups.
Therefore, all Americans should speak out against
these injustices.

African Americans between the ages of 20 and 39 were shown
to have the most fast food and supersized non-diet soda in their diet
when compared with their Caucasian and Hispanic counterparts, as
one-fifth of their calorie intake came from quick service restaurants.
Just another part of Ron’s Paul’s ridden racist agenda.

Christopher Scott "Chris" Kyle (April 8, 1974 – February 2,
2013) was a Navy SEAL and the most lethal sniper in American

military history, with 160 confirmed kills (out of 255 claimed kills). He
was shot and killed in a rifle range on February 2, 2013, in Texas,
while trying to help another vet get over PTSD. People were
shocked at this tweet but I was not. I know Paul is a Nazi so for him
Jews are the cause of all the misery in the world. Since Kyle shot
the enemies of the Jews, Kyle became Paul’s enemy. After he got
heat for this remark he wrote, “As a veteran, I certainly recognize
that this weekend's violence and killing of Chris Kyle were a tragic
and sad event. My condolences and prayers go out to Mr. Kyle’s
family. Unconstitutional and unnecessary wars have endless
unintended consequences. A policy of non-violence, as Christ
preached, would have prevented this and similar tragedies.” But one
week later he was back to his original position: “The warning that
"he who lives by the sword dies by the sword" goes not only for
individuals but for entire societies. It is a warning to all of us. A
country or a society that lives with the violence of pre-emptive war in
fact self-destructs.” If you have info on Ron Paul contact me at





I first became aware of the Nazi termite Ron Paul in
the late 1970’s through the Spotlight, a weekly
crypto-Nazi newspaper published by a Nazi front
group known as Liberty Lobby. The Spotlight
repeatedly featured Ron Paul. I learned about the
existence of Liberty Lobby through Phil Fellows, a
rightwing libertarian who let me crash at Grover
Norquist’s National Taxpayers Union townhouse. Norquist is now a
big Paul supporter5 and a supporter of Muslim candidates for
political office. At this time in my life I worked as a Congressional
investigator in Washington, D.C. It was in this rightwing milieu that,
in 1974, Phil took me to the Liberty Lobby office at 300
Independence Avenue so I could display pictures of two tramps that
were picked up from a freight train parked at the back of the Texas
School Book Depository an hour after the Kennedy assassination. I
pointed out their resemblance to CIA contract agent Frank Fiorini
Sturgis and CIA official Everette Howard Hunt. Both of these men
had gained notoriety after have been involved in Watergate.6 In fact
the CIA spook Howard Hunt’s identity and photograph had been
revealed for the first time as a result of Watergate.


6. Spotlight got into a legal battle with E. Howard Hunt about Hunt’s role in
the Kennedy assassination after they published an article by Victor
Marchetti that quoted a James Angleton memo that read, “Someday we
are going to have to account for Howard Hunt’s presence in Dallas on
November 22, 1963. This author was also sued by E. Howard Hunt over a
similar issue.



The Liberty Lobby staff was pleased by my discovery as it could
prove highly detrimental to the CIA. After I discovered they were
Nazis I realized these vermin hated CIA because some of its agents
and officials had been in the OSS7 and because it was pro-Israel.

7. Office of Strategic Services – the precursor to the CIA that fought the
Nazis during the Second World War


They asked me who I was. When I told them my name was Alan
Jules Weberman, one man said “You mean Alan Jew Weberman?”
This outburst of Jew hatred aroused my interest in Liberty Lobby
and while working for Congressman Henry Gonzalez, a Democrat
from San Antonio, Texas and an associate of Representative Ron
Paul on the House Banking and Currency Committee, I began to
listen to Liberty Lobby’s radio broadcasts every morning before
going to work at the National Archives. I couldn’t believe my ears. It
was pure Nazi propaganda. The putrid corpses of Father Coughlin
and Gerald L. K. Smith had been resurrected!

When Liberty Lobby announced it was
coming out with a weekly publication
called The Spotlight I sent in a money
order and subscribed under a fictitious
name. I became a weekly reader of this
vile Nazi rag for counter-intelligence
purposes. I vividly remember reading the
list of those who attended Spotlight and Liberty Lobby functions and
there was always this man with two first names, Ron Paul.
Republican Congressman Ron Paul this and Ron Paul that.
Congressman Ron Paul will be at the Populist Party (the political
arm of Liberty Lobby) Convention along with David Duke the 1988
Populist Party presidential candidate. Congressman Ron Paul will
be attending the dinner for Spotlight economist Martin Larson. On
and on! It reminded me of an old Jackie Gleason bit where he would
read a list of names and then add “and of course the ever popular
Mae Busch!” a silent movie star that few had heard of. Ron Paul
was so loyal and supportive of Liberty Lobby that he was given an
honorary dinner by it. That was because Ron Paul shared its Nazi
beliefs because he was, and is, a clever calculating Liberty Lobby /
Spotlight type Nazi, a Nazi without a swastika, bent on the mass
murder of the Jewish people and on sending the Blacks back to
Africa. Paul doesn’t look the part no screaming speeches – no Hitler
mustache - and that’s one of the reasons for his success. Another


reason people don’t recognize him for what he is because he is a
pediatrician; however Cuban terrorist Orlando Bosch and Islamist
terrorist Ayman al-Zawahari were also pediatricians.

Back in the 1970’s I reasoned, ‘Okay the Nazis have one
representative in the U. S. Congress that no one has ever heard of.’
I wasn’t that worried. At one time the Nazis had many more but
were still unsuccessful: Republican Senator Gerald Nye of North
Dakota, Senator Burton Wheeler of Montana, and Rep. Martin Dies
of Texas were all Nazi sympathizers if not Nazis. But in retrospect I
should have been very worried. A cancer can start as a tiny lump.

So I’ve known for over thirty years that the Nazis at Spotlight
were Paul’s greatest supporters and he was their de facto
Congressional Representative. After Paul failed to get re-elected
and went on a speaking tour Spotlight made sure he got the money
he needed to finance his campaign by giving them their mailing list
so he could return to public office.

Spotlight and Liberty Lobby was old
school Nazi, 1930’s to 1940’s Third Reich
Nazi, the residue of the Nazi intelligence
and propaganda network that operated
before, during and after the Second World
War. They were different from swastika
wearing neo-Nazis like George Lincoln
Rockwell (seen on the left next to Dan
Burroughs, a Nazi who turned out to be a
Jew) and his crew of misfits and in the long run proved to be more
dangerous. Many of the Spotlight policy board members had been
interred, often secretly, as Nazi spies during the war by the Justice
Department then released after the war ended as they were no
longer considered a threat to national security and might prove
valuable in the Cold War. Ron Paul wrote that he opposed their


As far back as the Civil War, World War I, and World
War II, very often speaking out on political issues
was met with law enforcement officials actually
charging them with crimes and even having
individuals imprisoned.

The Spotlight scum were spies
right out of the movie The House on
92nd Street. Spotlight contributor
Conrad Grieb was interred by the
Justice Department as a suspected
Nazi spy during World War II. As
documented in the book Undercover
by John Roy Carlson8 Grieb ran the
Nazi office in Harlem, hoping to recruit “Negros.” Conrad Grieb was
the author of numerous articles that claimed it was impossible for
two million Jews to have been killed by diesel engine exhaust. The
Jewish Defense Organization tracked Conrad Grieb down then
paid him a visit on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Grieb was no
longer a member of New York City’s social elite class as he was in
the 1940’s. He lived on the fifth floor of a six floor walk up. One
individual gained entrance to the denied area and pounded on his
door. Greib called the cops then went up the fire escape to the roof.
He began throwing stuff down at us so we ducked under some
scaffolding split up and left before the police arrived.



Eustace Mullins, a prominent Spotlight
contributor, was a confident of the traitorous
fascist poet and propagandist Ezra Pound.
Mullins did a book on Pound and visited him
in the mental hospital Pound was sent to
after the war – Pound belonged in a federal
prison for the act of treason because Pound
had made anti-American broadcasts from
Rome but his influential literary friends had him committed instead.
Mullins, who blamed the Federal Reserve Bank for everything evil in
the world, was a classic Jew-hating piece of crap. In The Biological
Jew he wrote that

This religious ceremony of drinking the blood of an
innocent gentile child is basic to the Jew's entire
concept of his existence as a parasite, living off of the
blood of the host.9

Pro-Paul websites promote Mullins lies:

Eustace Mullins Interview! This is quite an
interesting interview from a man who introduced the
world to the reality of the Federal Reserve. At the
urging of poet Ezra Pound, Eustace Mullins began
scouring the Library of Congress for two years to
write his book, Secrets of the Federal Reserve.
Mullins is a bit critical of Ron Paul, and he also
claims that G. Edward Griffin has ripped him off
tremendously. All in all good, challenging food for
thought. Gnostic Media Podcast #045 - A Bona Fide



Tyler Kent, who was imprisoned in the Tower of
London during the war for treason was employed
by Spotlight. Kent was born in Manchuria where
his father was a U.S. Consul. Eventually, through
his father’s connections, he joined the State
Department and was posted to the U.S. embassy
in London. There, he became responsible for
encoding and decoding Top Secret messages.
With a position which required him to encode and decode sensitive
telegrams, Kent had access to a wide range of secret documents,
especially the communications between Churchill and Roosevelt,
and he stole many of them. He also became politically active in
support of the front group known as The America First Committee.
On May 18, 1940, Ambassador Joseph Kennedy was informed of
Kent’s treason, and agreed to waive diplomatic immunity against
Kent. On May 20, 1940 Kent was arrested in a dawn raid at his flat.
When officers of MI5 inspected the flat, they found 1,929 official
documents: besides Churchill’s cables, there was a book containing
the names of people under surveillance by Special Branch and MI5.
Searchers also found keys to the U.S. Embassy code room. Kent
was specifically charged with stealing documents that “might be
directly or indirectly useful to an enemy.” On October 23, 1940 Kent
was tried in camera in the Old Bailey. On November 7, 1940 he was
convicted of treason and sentenced to seven years imprisonment.
Ed Delaney indicted for treason amid charges of working with the
Nazi foreign office worked for Liberty Lobby and Spotlight. Delaney
was a Nazi English-speaking propagandist broadcasting from Berlin
so he fit right in at Spotlight the post-war Nazi propaganda organ.11



Spotlight and its Holocaust denying creation, the Institute for
Historical Review, maintained relationships with Nazi officers from
World War II. When he died in 1994, the Belgian Nazi Leon Degrelle
(seen above with Hitler and Himmler), who commanded an SS
Division during World War II, was memorialized as a "friend of
Institute for Historical Review." Indeed, until he died, the
unrepentant Nazi Degrelle published long essays lauding Hitler in
the Journal of Historical Review. The Journal also published articles
admiring Hitler by Nazi General Otto Ernst Remer, who was
instrumental in keeping der Führer in power after the failed
assassination attempt against him in 1944, and who was a featured
speaker at the eighth Institute for Historical Review conference in
1987. The Journal featured articles by other, lesser-known Nazi
scum as well. Another part of the Institute for Historical Review /
Spotlight group was Noontide Press. Noontide Press publishes and
disseminates Nazi and anti-Semitic classics such as The Protocols
of the Elders of Zion, Mein Kampf, The Turner Diaries and David
Duke's My Awakening. On audio cassette tape the titles include:
Luftwaffe Songs and Stormtrooper Marches. Noontide Press's Web
site offers full text versions of Mein Kampf and The International
Jew, and an almost-complete reproduction in English of Nazi
propagandist Julius Streicher's 1934 German children's book, The
Poisonous Mushroom, including its caricatured illustrations of Jews
and its obscene nursery rhymes.


Just like Ron Paul, under the guise of libertarianism Spotlight,
among other things, railed against the prosecution of Nazi war
criminals, promoted the David Duke Congressional campaign,
claimed the Mossad was responsible for everything you can
imagine, claimed the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was
deliberate, targeted every Jewish politician they could locate and
started the Holocaust denying Institute for Historical Review. While
all this propaganda was being disseminated Ron Paul was
prominently featured in the Spotlight as you can see below:


These vermin were the same scum whose masters in Germany
were able to mass murder at least six million of my people including
my relatives in Hungary. The Jewish race had better take these old
school Nazis seriously because they have proven to be adept at
what they do. It is no accident that Paul has become the most
dangerous Nazi in America. These are America’s smartest, most
devious Nazis. Their longevity makes them even more dangerous
as they wait in the wings for their moment to come when the
economy collapses, when political turmoil becomes the rule. These

maggots’ crypto-Nazi identities became a must because most
Americans don’t want any part of German WW II Nazism since
Americans died in WWII and Nazism involved the systematic killing
women and children. As a result Paul has countless Americans
fooled into believing he is something other than what he really is,
which is a potential genocidal maniac.

Unfortunately, the media describes Ron Paul as a “libertarian”
when in reality he is as far from liberty as you can get – there isn’t
any liberty under Nazism or Fascism unless you call liberty the right
to kill Jews, deport Blacks and other such dark pursuits. Just as Ron
Paul claims to a libertarian Spotlight claimed to be a “Libertarian”
publication thus the name Liberty Lobby. Spotlight threw all their
support behind Paul. Do you think Spotlight would support anyone
other than a Nazi? “Liberty” is one of Paul’s favorite words. It is a
dog whistle term and means right of one, emancipation from alleged
Jewish political and economic domination and influence that,
according to the Nazi Paul, are at the root of all of America’s

Some American Jews realize where Paul is coming from. In
1998 the Republican National Committee declared: "There is no
room in the party of Lincoln for a Klansman like David Duke."12 The
Republican National Committee never issued a similar statement
regarding Ron Paul, however, the conservative Republican Jewish
Coalition declined to invite Ron Paul to its presidential candidates
forum. Executive Director Matthew Brooks stated:

As Americans who are committed to a strong and
vigorous foreign policy, we are deeply concerned
about the prospective presidential campaign of
Congressman Ron Paul. While Rep. Paul plans to



run as a Republican, his views and past record place
him far outside of the Republican mainstream. His
candidacy, as we've seen in his past presidential
campaigns, will appeal to a very narrow constituency
in the U.S. electorate. Throughout his public service,
Paul has espoused a dangerous isolationist vision for
the U.S. and our role in the world. He has been a
virulent and harsh critic of Israel during his tenure in
Congress. Most recently Paul gave an interview in
which he voiced his objection to the recent killing of
Osama Bin Laden.13

Paul admires Osama. According to Paul:

Let there be no doubt, for every terrorist identified,
others will see only a freedom fighter. That was the
case when we aided Osama bin Laden in the 1980s.
He was a member of the Mujahedeen, and they were
the freedom fighters waging a just war against the
Soviet army. Of course, now he is our avowed
enemy. A broad definition of terrorism outside the
understanding of those who attacked the United
States opens a Pandora’s Box in our foreign policy



Then there is the Republican component to Paul’s Nazi cover.
How can someone be a Republican and a Nazi at the same time?
Well, Herbert Hoover had a special relationship with Adolf Hitler and
met with him in 1938. Hoover was a covert supporter of the German
fuehrer. Hoover would oppose America’s involvement in World War
II and fight against FDR’s Lend Lease program to aid Britain. He
assured everyone that Hitler would soon conquer Europe and it was
better to be his friend. Hoover was the behind the scenes power of
the America First Committee, leaving the public face to Charles
Lindbergh. According to FDR, there could be no doubt that
Lindbergh was a Nazi. Lindbergh was finally exposed when he gave
his famous anti-Semitic, America First speech in Iowa. After the
speech, which blamed the Jews for the world’s unrest, Hoover
invited Lindbergh up to his hotel suite at the Waldorf Astoria and
praised him.15




As stated, Ron Paul is a Frankensteinian creation of Spotlight
and Liberty Lobby. Willis Carto created both these entities that
trace back to an organization intent on sending American blacks
back to Africa. Starting in October 1966 two American journalists,
Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson, published a series of stories
under The Washington Merry-go-round that recounted the findings
of a former Liberty Lobby employee, Jeremy Horne. Horne said he
had discovered a box of correspondence between Liberty Lobby
leader, Willis Carto (photo above) and numerous government
officials establishing the Joint Council of Repatriation, a forerunner
organization to the Liberty Lobby. The Joint Council of Repatriation
stated that their fundamental purpose was to "repatriate" blacks
"back to Africa.” Ex-Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Tom Brady
and various members of the White Citizens’ Councils who had
worked to establish the Joint Council of Repatriation, also
contributed to the founding of Liberty Lobby. Justice Tom P. Brady
was the cracker barrel philosopher of Mississippi's racist white


Citizens' Councils and the author of Black Monday, a Negro-baiting
tract attacking the U.S. Supreme Court's 1954 school desegregation
decision.16 In Black Monday Brady wrote,

Whenever and wherever the white man has drunk
the cup of black hemlock, whenever and wherever
his blood has been infused with the blood of the
Negro, the white man, his intellect and culture have

Brady, then a state Circuit Court judge, insisted that the Brown
v Board of Education decision was "not the law of the land." Other
correspondence referred to U.S. Congressional support for the
emerging Liberty Lobby, such as from South Carolina Senator
Strom Thurmond (Dixiecrat presidential candidate in 1948) and
California U.S. Representative James B. Utt. Utt made national
news by suggesting that “a large contingent of barefooted Africans”
might be training in Georgia as part of a United Nations military
exercise to take over the United States. Utt also believed sex
education was a communist plot!18

Willis Carto created Ron Paul. In 1974 Paul started out as a
delegate to the Texas state Republican convention and was also an
unsuccessful candidate for election to the 94th Congress. In 1976
he was elected as a Republican to the 94th Congress, by special
election to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of United
States Representative Robert R. Casey. He was there from April 3,
1976 to January 3, 1977. He was an unsuccessful candidate for
reelection to the 95th Congress in 1976. He was elected to the 96th
and to the 97th 98th Congresses from January 3, 1979 to January 3,


He was not a candidate for reelection to the House of
Representatives in 1984, but was an unsuccessful candidate for
nomination to the United States Senate. He was elected to the 105th
and to the seven succeeding Congresses from January 3, 1997 to
the present. He was an unsuccessful candidate for the Republican
presidential nomination in 2008.

The Spotlight started publication in September 1975 and was
immediately successful, increasing in circulation annually until it
peaked in 1981 at an average paid run of more than 330,000 per
week. Paul was unsuccessful at getting re-elected in 1976, but as
the Spotlight became more powerful so did Ron Paul. Ed Crane, the
president of the Cato Institute, reported that Ron Paul told him that
“his best source of congressional campaign donations was the
mailing list for the Spotlight.”19 The Louisiana Coalition against
Racism and Nazism revealed that the Liberty Lobby was a key
David Duke backer in his successful 1989 run for the state
legislature, providing him a 100,000-name mailing list and direct-
mail expertise. A Liberty Lobby staffer, Trisha Katson, also worked
for Duke around that time.20 The Spotlight got Paul back in office
and kept him office – in retrospect for good reason – so that their
protégée could become the most dangerous Nazi in America.

In 1985 Paul began selling newsletters. The main source of
subscribers to the Ron Paul newsletter came from Spotlight, where


it was heavily advertised. People paid $100 a year to get the views
of a former United States Congressman and unsuccessful candidate
for nomination to the United States Senate. The newsletters were
written from the first person. They had an air of authenticity about
them and contained numerous anecdotes about Congressman
Paul’s experiences in Washington. It is no stretch for him to have
written them as he has subsequently written numerous books. Paul
made more than a million dollars from this venture. If Ron Paul
didn’t write at least some part of them he would have been guilty of
mail fraud. But he did have help.

In 2001, Paul took “moral responsibility” for the comments
printed in his newsletter under his name, telling Texas Monthly
magazine that the comments were written by an unnamed
ghostwriter and did not represent his views.

I could never say this in the campaign, but those
words weren’t really written by me. It wasn’t my
language at all. Other people help me with my
newsletter as I travel around. I think the one on
Barbara Jordan was the saddest thing, because
Barbara and I served together and actually she was a
delightful lady. We wanted to do something on
affirmative action, and it ended up in the newsletter
and became personalized. I never personalize
anything. They were never my words, but I had some
moral responsibility for them. I actually really wanted
to try to explain that it doesn’t come from me directly,
but they [campaign aides] said that’s too confusing.21

Content analysis of the newsletters reveals an uncanny
contemporaneous resemblance to articles in the Spotlight leading



me to believe that Spotlight publisher Willis Carto, and not Paul’s
associate Lew Rockwell,22 ghost wrote some parts of them. Carto
had plenty of experience writing newsletters and his office was a
few blocks from the Capitol and House Office Building. In 1955,
Carto began publication of the monthly Right Newsletter and
established the Research Department of Liberty Lobby, which
began publication of Liberty Letter in 1960.

The newsletters mirrored Spotlight’s often republished Nazi
propaganda in regard to the alleged innocence of accused Nazi war
criminals John Demjanjuk and Andrija Artukovic:

There is plenty of evidence that John Demanjuk —
an American deported to Israel who may be executed
there – is innocent of the crimes with which he was
charged by the U.S. Justice Department’s Office of
Special Investigations (OSI), in part with the use of
KGB-generated documents. And now there is also
evidence that Andrija Artukovic, who died in a
Communist Yugoslavian prison at age 88 after being

22. In 2008, Rockwell denied in an interview with the New Republic that he
was Paul’s ghostwriter.


deported, was not the war criminal he was portrayed
by the OSI to be. Thanks to Congressman Bill
Dannemeyer and Dave Drier, both California
Republicans, the Justice Department’s Office of
Professional Responsibility is now looking into
misconduct by the OSI. It’s too late for Artukovic, but
maybe we can use it to quench the anti-German
bigotry that the Nazi specter is used to stir up.

After all, the Nazis ruled Germany for 12 years a long
time ago. The Germans are a great people. I’m sick
of anti-Germanism, which is not – needless to say –
a hate crime. In fact, it is – like anti-whitism and anti-
Christianism – an approved belief. How about a
German Anti-Defamation League?

In May 2011 a German court sentenced John Demjanjuk to five
years in prison for his role in the killing of 27,900 Jews at a Nazi
death camp but Ron Paul knows better. During World War II Andrija
Artuković was named the Minister of the Interior in the newly formed
Nazi Serbian puppet government. As such Artuković was closely
involved in the mass murder of Serbs, Jews, Roma and the opening
of concentration camps such as Jasenovac. There is no doubt as to
his guilt. After the war he escaped via Switzerland to Ireland and
then finally to California, where he lived until the mid-1980s. His
extradition was requested by the Yugoslav (Serbian) authorities to
be put on the trial for war crimes. The court in Zagreb sentenced
him to death on May 14, 1986. These are the mass murdering
vermin Paul claims were innocent. Only someone who condones
genocide like Paul would have sympathy for these two evil


As they did in this newsletter Paul and Carto frequently quoted
Paul's "old colleague," Representative William Dannemeyer -- who
advocated quarantining people with AIDS--praising him for
"speaking out fearlessly despite the organized power of the gay
lobby." Dannemeyer once compared Nelson Mandela to Willie
Horton, read graphic homosexual acts on the floor of Congress, and
infamously claimed that airborne spores caused AIDS, a disease he
said was "God’s way of punishing gays."


The Spotlight supported the candidacy of the racist swine
David Duke and Duke appeared at many of their events. Duke was
a KKK Grand Wizard and a member of the American Nazi Party.

Jews are trying to exterminate our race. I think,
probably in a moral sense, the Jewish people have
been a blight. And they probably deserve to go into
the ashbin of history. But saying that and actually
shooting or killing people in masses, are two different
things. I'm not advocating extermination. I think the
best thing is to resettle them in someplace where
they can't exploit others. And I don't think they can
live among themselves, I really don't. Let's put it this
way. I question whether 6 million Jews actually died
in Nazi death camps. There are two major sources
for Holocaust stories. One is the Nuremburg war-
crimes trial, which has been shown by all honest
historians to be a farce of justice. Another source is
the great body of literature and media work, and at


least 90% of that material is from biased Jewish
sources. 23

Ron Paul supported David Dukes bid to become a United
States Senator:

The Duke Victory

David Duke received 44% of the vote in the Senate
primary race I in Louisiana, 60% of the white vote,
and 9% of the block vote. This totaled 100,000 more
votes than the current governor when he won.

Duke lost the election. but he scared the blazes out
of the Establishment. If the official Republican hadn't
been ordered to drop out, he might have won.
Certainly there would have boon a run-off.

Duke’s platform called for tax cuts, no quotas, no
affirmative action, no welfare and no busing.
"Tonight, we concede the election" he said. "But we
will never concede our fight for equal rights for all

To many voters, this seems like just plain good
sense. Duke carried baggage from his past but the
voters were willing to overlook that. And if he had
been afforded the forgiveness an ex-communist gets,
he might have von.

Liberal columnists like Richard Cohen of the
Washington Post say he got so "many votes because
Louisianans were racist and ignorant. Baloney.

23. Evelyn Rich interview, February 1986


David Broder, also of the Post and equally liberal,
writing on an entirely different subject, had it right:
“No one wants to talk about (race) publicly, but if you
ask any campaign consultant or pollster privately,
you can confirm the sad reality that a great many
working-class and middle-class white Americans are
far less hostile to the rich and their tax breaks, than
they are to the poor and minorities with their welfare
and affirmative-action programs.”

Liberals are notoriously blind to the sociological
effects of their own programs. David Duke was hurt
by his past. How many more Dukes are there waiting
in the wings without such a taint?


The Nazi waiting in the wings with less baggage is Ron Paul
himself, as he never openly donned the swastika or a Klan robe as
David Duke did, as shown in the photographs on the previous page.
Liberty Lobby and Spotlight helped start the Populist Party, which
ran Duke as its presidential candidate in 1988. In that race, Duke
received 48,267 votes across the nation.

The Ron Paul Survival Newsletter accused Israel of being the
perpetrator behind the bombing of a Berlin Disco.

A LEAD BALLOON to the Reagan administration for
lying about the bombing of Libya and attempted
killing of Khadafy. It was clear at the time that this

unconstitutional act of war was a trumped-up affair
for U.S. political reasons, and now it turns out –
according to the West German police – that there is
no “Libyan connection” with the woman who bombed
the disco in Berlin, killing a U. S. soldier and
triggering the Libyan raid. If anything, she was in
cahoots with Syria, or Israel’s Mossad, which always
seeks to stir up anti-Arab feeling here.

Paul had the same Spotlight line that the Mossad was behind
terrorism and was running false flag operations. Paul knew better
than a Berlin court that convicted four Libyan-connected terrorists in
the 1986 bombing of a West Berlin disco that killed two U.S. soldiers
and a Turkish woman. The court said the bombing was planned by
members of the Libyan secret service and workers at the Libyan
Embassy in then-East Berlin.

The Spotlight constantly ran articles about the USS Liberty
accusing Israel of deliberately attacking the American ship.
A Spotlight report of November 21, 1977 purported to implicate the
CIA's counter-intelligence chief, James J. Angleton, in having
conspired with Israel in orchestrating the attack on the Liberty.

An Israeli loyalist who headed the CIA's liaison with
Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, and who
also played a key role in helping Israel develop its
nuclear arsenal (in defiance of President John F.
Kennedy), Angleton believed the destruction of
the Liberty could be used as a "Pearl Harbor" or
"Remember the Maine" type incident to inflame
American passions against the Arabs.

Paul took the same line in his newsletter:


A Hero Honors Heroes

Marine hero Pete McCloskey, my former colleague in
the House, has always been a man of courage. The
most recent example was his dedication of a new
public library in Grafton, Wisconsin.

Courage to dedicate a library? Yes, because of a
massive and vituperative campaign against the
private donors who raised more than a million dollars
for the town’s new library and then named it in honor
of the U.S.S. Liberty. This is the first memorial to the
34 dead and the 171 wounded American sailors from
the Liberty, which was deliberately assaulted by
Israeli torpedo rocket, and machine gun fire in 1967
to disguise Israel’s sneak attack on Syria.. The U.S.
flag was flying, and previous Israeli reconnaissance
flights had identified the ship as American. Not one of
the survivors, not one U.S. official (at least when
talking off the record), doubts the attack was
deliberate. It went on for hours, and included strafing
of wounded sailors in a lifeboat. But the sailors and
their ship might have fallen off the edge of the earth,
for all the attention they got. It was down the memory

`A 1995 issue of the Ron Paul Survival Report, speculated that
the federal government bombed the Alfred P. Murrah Federal
Building in Oklahoma City.24



Oklahoma City

We're far from knowing everything, or even many
things, about the horrific bombing of the Oklahoma
City federal building.

The latest rumors are tying this to the private militias.
Is the government-media combine set to smear
everyone who questions the wonderfulness of the
federal government? That’s clearly their plan,
whether or not the criminal responsible turn out to be
“right-wing extremists.”

Some people even think that the government itself
could have been responsible. Certainly it has been
worried about its waning authority and respect
among the people, and such an event builds up the
central government.

The government would not use its own agents, these
people say. Spy agencies frequently use false-flag
recruitment. That is, the crazed men recruited into a
'right-wing' terrorist cell would not know they were
actually working for the BAT, for example.

Spotlight ran a similar story:

No Way' Truck Bomb Destroyed Murrah

By Mike Blair

An Oklahoma grand jury has heard more evidence
suggesting the federal government has covered up
many facts about the Murrah building bombing.

Retired Air Force Gen. Benton K. Partin has told the
Oklahoma County grand jury there is no way a crude
bomb consisting of a mixture of ammonium nitrate

fertilizer and fuel oil (ANFO) was responsible for the
1995 destruction of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal
Office Building in Oklahoma City. Partin said he
believes four separate charges, placed within the
building, were responsible for the devastation. The
Justice Department contends a single ANFO bomb
built within a Ryder rental truck and parked in front of
the building destroyed it.25

“Four separate charges, placed within the building?” Sound
familiar? “Internal demolition?” This is what the 9/11 revisionists
claimed took place six years later when the World Trade Center was

The Spotlight contained numerous articles
declaring the innocence of Ernst Zundel, a
Holocaust denying fat Nazi swine. This made
sense as Willis Carto had started the Institute
for Historical Review (IHR) the first
organization dedicated to Holocaust denial.
Carto even sent Holocaust denier Bradley
Smith to Canada in 1984 to cover the trial of
Zundel for The Spotlight. Ernst Zundel was deported from Canada
and convicted of Holocaust denial in Germany. He described his
captivity to The Spotlight saying, "I was held in solitary confinement
with no windows, a light burning around the clock and a
peephole....Sort of how Rudolf Hess was treated." Zundel spoke at
numerous Holocaust denial Nazi conferences sponsored by Willis
Carto. This is from the Ron Paul Newsletter:

Would the New Republic, which has been sickeningly
pompous on Rushdie and in its hymns to secular
humanism, defend things it would find heretical? The



answer is no. This liberal magazine has past
defended Canada’s “anti-hate” law, which was used
to fine and jail a Canadian author, Ernst Zundel, who
questioned the historical reality of the Holocaust.
Liberal newspapers like the Washington Post and
the Boston Globe have also praised the Canadian
law and this prosecution. I’ll believe Establishment
liberals are really committed to free speech when I
see Norman Mailer and his cohorts wearing “I am
Ernst Zundel” buttons and holding readings of his

I personally am offended by writings advocating
fascism, socialism, Communism, and other forms of
special-interest big government. Many people
understandably find Zundel’s writings offensive. But
his case is no different in principle from Rushdie’s,
except that Zundel is poor and in jail, and Rushdie is
rich and protected.

So there it is in black and white, under the guise of “free
speech” Paul defended another Nazi like himself. Note how anti-
hate law appears in quotations. He called Zundel a “Canadian
author who questioned the reality of the Holocaust” and not a Nazi.
He wanted to have readings of his works! Note that Paul is offended

by a bunch of other isms but not offended by Nazism. “Special
interest big government” is another way of saying Zionist
Occupational Government.

More evidence that Paul parrots the
Spotlight, Liberty Lobby line comes from Eric
Rittberg (who is half-Jewish on his mother’s
side). Rittberg was a former Senior Aide to US
Congressman Ron Paul who defected. From
1997 to 2003 he was Campaign Coordinator for
Ron Paul for Congress, from 1995 to 1996 he
was the National Organizer of Draft Ron Paul for
President Committee, and from 1991 to 1992 he was Travel Aide
then Personal Assistant to Paul who was the Libertarian Candidate
for President from 1987 to 1988. Rittberg was a top aide to Ron
Paul for 17 years until he left the fold to run against Paul. Paul wrote
this, “Eric, your enthusiasm for liberty is infectious. Stay that way.
Your help is deeply appreciated-- US Congressman Ron Paul (R-

Mark Lane, a Jew who worked for Spotlight, claimed Willis
Carto never said a bad word about Jews. Rittberg stated:

Ron Paul is most assuredly an isolationist. He denies
this charge vociferously. But I can tell you straight
out, I had countless arguments discussions with him
over his personal views. For example, he strenuously
does not believe the United States had any business
getting involved fighting Hitler in WW II. He
expressed to me countless times, that 'saving the
Jews,' was absolutely none of our business. When
pressed, he often times brings up conspiracy theories
like FDR knew about the attacks of Pearl Harbor
weeks before hand, or that WW II was just


'blowback,' for Woodrow Wilson’s foreign policy
errors, and such.26

Numerous repetitive articles appeared in Spotlight that claimed
Pearl Harbor was orchestrated by FDR to get America involved in
World War II. Over and over again Ron Paul’s thought is nothing but
pure Spotlight Nazi ideology. That is why Ron Paul, like the
Spotlight scum that created him, is determined to create a situation
where millions of Jews are murdered. He is a filthy Nazi pig and he
must be stopped. Paul betrayed his Nazism when he told Congress
that America fought on the wrong side during World War II:

Any academic discussion questioning the wisdom of
our policies surrounding World War II is met with
shrill accusations of anti-Semitism and Nazi lover. No
one is ever even permitted, without derision by the
media, the university intellectuals and the politicians,
to ask why the United States allied itself with the
murdering Soviets and then turned over Eastern
Europe to them while ushering in a 45-year saber-
rattling, dangerous Cold War period.27

America should have aligned itself with the
Axis Powers? That is the implication here.
There is no doubt in this researchers mind
that if “Herr Von Paul” existed in a different
era he would have been part of The America
First Committee or the German-American
Bund two Nazi front groups. The America
First Committee preached “isolationism”
before World War II. The America First Committee was really not




isolationist – they were a Nazi-financed front group put in place to
keep America out of World War II so that Germany could defeat
Russia and England. One of America First’s leaders was the aviator
Laura Ingalls. During World War II she was arrested and charged
with being an un-registered agent of the Nazi German government,
and though she always claimed she had been acting on her own as
an anti-Nazi spy, she was convicted and imprisoned for twenty
months.28 Father Thomas Coughlin, another prominent American
Firster, was charged with sedition during World War II. Compare the
America First Committee four basic principles with those of Ron

 AMERICA FIRST: The United States must build an
impregnable defense for America.

 PAUL: The United States must build an impregnable
missile defense for America. Paul: “Preparedness is
a word that has been thrown around a lot recently,
but it begs the question ‘prepared for what?’ No
nation attacked ours, no nation has threatened ours,
no sane leader would do so as it would be the death
warrant of his own nation, his own people, and likely
his own self. We are prepared to repel an attack and
meet force with force but not necessarily to protect
our nation and the populace. We are still vulnerable
to a missile attack and have done little to protect
against such a possibility.”

 AMERICA FIRST: No foreign power, nor group of
[Axis] powers, can successfully attack a prepared

28. The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century, Wall
Street and ... By Glen Yeadon, John Hawkins-page 161


 PAUL: No foreign power like Iran can successfully
attack a prepared fortress America.

 AMERICA FIRST: American democracy can be
preserved only by keeping out of the European war.

 PAUL: American democracy can be preserved only
by keeping out of the Israeli-Iranian war.

 AMERICA FIRST: "Aid short of war" weakens
national defense at home and threatens to involve
America in war abroad.

 PAUL "Foreign Aid to Israel short of war" weakens
national defense at home and threatens to involve
America in war abroad.

Under the guise of isolationism the Jew-hating Nazi Ron Paul is
attempting to keep America out of a war between
Israel and Iran so Israel can be defeated.

The German American Bund was formed in
July 1933 from the ashes of previous German
American societies. Wilhelm Bohle, a German
undersecretary of state, organized the Nazi support for Germans
abroad, consisting of agitation among German immigrants and
German Americans, cooperation with other anti-Semitic groups, and
direct espionage. The Pauls’ were Pennsylvanian German-
Americans and susceptible to recruitment. Allen Goeppel and Anton
Fuchs were Bund leaders in Pittsburgh. Peter Gaenger, was head of
the propaganda section of the Bund there. Although FBI records of
Bund membership that have been released list only the Bund
leadership evidence suggested that Ron Paul’s grandfather or
father might very well have been a Bund member.

Paul’s Nazism runs deep in his German blood. His grandfather
Caspar Paul, born in Hohenzell, Schluchtern, Prussia August 3,

1866, died [living 1930] was said to have emigrated from Germany
at the age of 14. Caspar Paul was married on May 4, 1899 to
Sophia Ziegler, born in Pennsylvania, on September 15, 1874, died
February 22, 1964. Paul’s grandfather became a truck farmer in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and eventually started a successful dairy
farm. He had 4 sons and 1 daughter. His second son, Howard
Casper Paul, was Ron Paul’s father.

Howard Caspar Paul was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on
August 19, 1904. He was married on October 23, 1929 to Margaret
Dumont, who was born in Pennsylvania on March 7, 1908, and who
died on July 10, 2001. Howard Caspar Paul died on May 23, 1997.
He had an eighth grade education.29

When conscription started in 1940 Howard Casper Paul was 36
years old. At this time those aged 18 to 45 were immediately liable
for induction yet there is nothing that I can find that indicates
Howard performed any military service. Interestingly enough, Paul
claims that it was his father who first made him aware of the plight of

Though I was not active in politics in high school or
college, I recall attending a Rotary Club meeting in
the early 1950s with my father. The speaker was a
college student from Palestine studying in the United
States. Her story was about how her family had been
forced from their property, which had been in the
family for centuries, but was then used for Israeli
settlements. I can recall thinking at the time that this
did not seem fair to me, and it doesn't seem fair to
me today.30


30. Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom
By Ron Paul

This story is made up. I can’t see a Rotary Club having much
interest in Palestinians in the early 1950’s nor do I believe there
were Palestinian exchange students all over the United States.
“Settlements” didn’t start until Israel annexed the West Bank in the

Grandpa Casper Paul may have visited Nazi Germany. He had
left Germany before the war, but he and his wife returned there after
the armistice. How long after the armistice that ended World War I?
Were they there when Hitler was coming to power or was in power?

During one of his speeches in Congress Paul stated, “The
foolish entrance into World War I to satisfy Wilson’s ego led to a
disastrous peace at Versailles, practically guaranteeing World War
II.” Patrick Buchanan had a similar analysis:

It was Wilsonism, liberal interventionism, not
“isolationism” that created the moral political swamp
in which fascism, Hitlerism, and Stalinism were
spawned. Unable to deal with the truth – that their
own heros produced the disasters that may yet ring
down the curtain on the Western Civilization.


In Promoting Democracy--An Obsession Whose Time Has
Passed he stated:

Promoting democracy is now our nation’s highest
ideal. Wilson started it with his ill-advised drive to
foolishly involve us in World War I. His utopian dream
was to make the world safe for democracy. Instead,
his naiveté and arrogance promoted our involvement
in the back-to-back tragedies of World War I and
World War II. It’s hard to imagine the rise of Hitler in
World War II without the Treaty of Versailles.

Hitler called the Germans who signed the Treaty of Versailles
the November criminals and called for their death. The Nazi line is
that it was the harsh treatment of Germany that was to blame for the
rise of Hitler, not economic chaos or the threat of Communism or
the inherent evil of the German Nazis. Paul stated:

Mr. Speaker, I have come forward in the past to
suggest that the history of this century has shown us
that the foreign policy of so-called “pragmatic
interventionists” has created a disastrous situation.
Specifically, I have pointed to the unintended
consequences of our government’s interventions.
Namely, I have identified how World War One helped
create the environment for the holocaust and how it
thus helped create World War Two and
thermonuclear war. And, I’ve mentioned how the
Second World War resulted in the enslavement of
much of Europe behind an iron curtain setting off the
cold war, and spread the international communism
and then our own disastrous foray into Vietnam. Yes,
all of these wars and tragedies wars hot and cold,


were in part caused by the so-called “war to end all

There is something strange about the following sentence taken
from the above. “I have identified how World War One helped create
the environment for the holocaust and how it thus helped create
World War Two and thermonuclear war.” “It” can refer to World War
I or “it” can also refer to “the holocaust” which would imply World
War II was fought for the Jews, a common anti-Jewish canard. In
the rest of this speech Paul focused on the Communists, rather than
the Nazis. Spotlight publisher Willis Carto agreed with Paul:

Hitler's defeat was the defeat of Europe. And of
America. How could we have been so blind? The
blame, it seems, must be laid at the door of the
international Jews. It was their propaganda, lies and
demands which blinded the West to what Germany
was doing.32


Ron Paul would not have gotten the
Spotlight mailing list had he not met with
Willis Carto. Carto has long been at the
forefront of the Nazi movement in the
United States and the Nazi sponsored
Holocaust denial movement worldwide.
Willis Carto was employed by the John
Birch Society as a Major Coordinator for approximately 4 months in
1959. He was fired by John Birch Society founder, Robert Welch for




Carto would soon join forces with Dr.
William Pierce a senior research scientist at
a Connecticut aerospace firm. In 1965
Pierce quit the John Birch Society and
joined the American Nazi Party (George
Lincoln Rockwell’s group). In 1970, Pierce,
a former American Nazi Party officer and
former editor of the National Socialist World, left the National
Socialist White People's Party, the successor to the American Nazi
Party, to join the National Youth Alliance which was originally
established by Willis Carto as the "Youth for Wallace" campaign in
support of the 1968 Presidential bid of racist Alabama Governor
George Wallace. After Wallace lost the Presidential race, Carto
renamed his organization the National Youth Alliance and attempted
to recruit activists to his group. Pierce, like Paul, was a highly
educated man, and that is what made both of them extremely
dangerous Nazis.

Pierce is perhaps best known for his 1978 book, The Turner
Diaries, which depicts the violent overthrow of the “Jew-
controlled” U.S. government. The book served as an inspiration for
various right-wing terrorists who grasped, admired, and attempted to
implement its message including Timothy McVeigh (1995 Oklahoma
City Federal Building bombing) and Robert J. Mathews (whose
group, The Order, was patterned upon the white revolutionary
groups in Turner Diaries.)

The Order was responsible for a crime spree in 1983 to 1984
which included counterfeiting, bank and armored car robberies,
bombing a synagogue, and murder – all in the service of their anti-
Semitic, racist ideology.

It should be noted that some of the major participants in The
Order were introduced to conspiracy theories about U.S. history
through their membership in the John Birch Society – e.g. Robert


Mathews and David Lane. Mathews also joined William Pierce’s
group, National Alliance.

Paul was a Bircher but denies ever belonging to the group,
though he was listed as a subscriber to its magazine, American
Opinion, according to Birch records in Brown University’s archives.33
And when he planned his first run for office in 1974, he has said, the
first person he called for advice was Larry McDonald, a right-wing
congressman who was later president of the John Birch Society.
Paul and the John Birch Society are also 50-50 co-owners of a 3.8-
acre property in Sweeny, Texas that was bequeathed to them by a
constituent of the congressman who died in 2010. On April 4, 2008
Congressman Ron Paul endorsed The John Birch Society in a
statement from his office. His statement also congratulated the
Society on being “a great patriotic organization” now in its 50th year.
Paul stated,

The John Birch Society is a great patriotic
organization featuring an educational program solidly
based on constitutional principles. I congratulate the
Society in this, its 50th year. I wish them continued
success and endorse their untiring efforts to foster
‘less government, more responsibility … and with
God’s help … a better world.’34

Paul also agreed to be the keynote speaker at the Society’s
50th anniversary celebration, October 2nd through the 5th, 2008 in
Appleton, Wisconsin.




Let Willis tell you more about himself:

Willis Allison Carto was born July 17, 1926 in Fort
Wayne, Indiana. After graduation from high school in
1944, he went into the Army to fight for the glorious
democracy of his country, the survival of Soviet
communism, a third and fourth term for Roosevelt, a
chance to kill Germans by the thousands as desired
by Churchill, Eisenhower and the Zionists, part of
Palestine for them as a bonus, vast riches for the
bankers and war suppliers, coffin makers and flag
makers. He earned a Purple Heart when he received
a memento from a Jap infantryman on Cebu Island,
P. I. on May 5, 1945. In 1953, with Aldrich Blake, he
founded Liberty & Property, Inc. and published the
first edition of seven which followed of the First
National Directory of “Rightist” Groups and
Organizations in the United States and Some Foreign
Countries. In 1955, he began publication of the
monthly Right newsletter and established the
Research Department of Liberty Lobby, which began
publication of Liberty Letter in 1960.


In 1964 he published Western Destiny magazine until
he merged it with The American Mercury in 1966. In
1975 he began publication of The Spotlight weekly
newspaper and in 1979 he founded the Institute for
Historical Review and began publication of the
scholarly Journal for Historical Review and organized
the first International Revisionist Conference in Los
Angeles, which was followed by ten others until 1993.
The first issue of the monthly Institute for Historical
Review Newsletter was published in January 1981,
followed by 90 others until late 1993. He published
and edited the Washington Observer Newsletter from
August 15, 1965 through September 15, 1976. In
1994 he founded The Barnes Review, a bimonthly
magazine of authentic history, of which he is the
publisher. In 2001, he began publication of
the American Free Press, a weekly newspaper.
Throughout his career, he has published over 200
titles of patriotic, nationalist books dealing with
different subjects. He has written under various
pseudonyms as well as his own name.35

What Carto omitted from his autobiography is that Carto was a
close associate of Francis Parker Yockey, a post-war Nazi
intelligence agent. Yockey killed himself rather than reveal the
structure of ODESSA, the organization of Nazi SS murderers who
escaped the post war dragnet of the Allies. After Yockey was
arrested for passport violations Willis Carto visited him in jail and
slipped him the cyanide he used to commit suicide. Aside from his
cellmate, Carto was the last person to see Parker alive. Check the
end of the New York Times (June 18, 1960) article that I have
reprinted below for his motivation in committing suicide.



Carto wrote this about Yockey:

In 1952 the State Department refused to renew his
passport. Repeatedly, he applied; each time he was
rejected. A game then developed between the FBI
and Yockey, for the FBI had received orders to keep
him under surveillance at all times. When he dropped
temporarily from sight, as he did frequently, his
friends and relatives and contacts were constantly
interrogated by agents who—they kept repeating—
“just want to talk to him.”


The FBI and CIA wanted to talk to Yockey
about ODESSA an organization that Yockey was
a courier for: The outcome of a post war Nazi
meeting in Strasbourg was the genesis of an
organization; well-financed and well-organized,
with the express purpose of helping fleeing Nazis
escape justice. This organization was called the
Organization Der Ehemaligen SS-Angehörigen
(The Organization of former SS members)
ODESSA. Nazi Hunter Simon Wiesenthal learned
of ODESSA accidentally during conversations with a former
member of German counter-espionage who he met during the
Nuremberg trials. The source said the organization was set up in
1946 after many Nazis already had been imprisoned. Those in jail
contacted friends and aid committees that had been established to
promote the welfare of prisoners. The assistance went beyond
humanitarian aid, a subterfuge, to abetting their escape. In short
order, ODESSA, built a large and reliable network geared to achieve
its ends, and began operations. Routes were mapped and contacts
were established. Influential Nazis vanished as they were secretly
ushered out of Germany and assisted in starting new lives under
false names in foreign countries. At the end of the war, only a
handful of high-ranking Nazi officials stood trial. Many who were
guilty of war crimes escaped with the help of ODESSA.

As Yockey’s early association with the Brownshirts of William
Dudley Pelley and the Father Coughlin movement indicated,
Yockey was from an early age drawn to Fascism and Nazism.
Pelley was arrested in April 1942 and indicted in May for violation of
the Espionage Act. He was convicted and sentenced to 15 years
imprisonment. In 1944, he was again indicted on practically identical
charges. Yockey had himself discharged from the military during
World War II (he was diagnosed as having paranoid type dementia
praecox), and as a successful lawyer and District Attorney in Detroit
obtained a job with the prosecution team of the Nuremburg War


Crimes Tribunals in Germany, for the purposes of infiltration and of
seeking out diehard Nazis in post-War Germany for exfiltration.
Yockey was the first Nazi to deny the existence of the gas chambers
and mass murder in his book Imperium.

These fact-creations were as nothing, however, to
the massive, post-war, "concentration-camp"
propaganda of the Culture-distorting regime based in
Washington. This propaganda announced that
6,000,000 members of the Jewish Culture-Nation-
State-Church-People-Race had been killed in
European camps, as well as an indeterminate
number of other people. The propaganda was on a
world-wide scale, and was of a mendacity that was
perhaps adapted to a uniformized mass, but was
simply disgusting to discriminating Europeans. The
propaganda was technically quite complete.
"Photographs" were supplied in millions of copies.
Thousands of the people who had been killed
published accounts of their experiences in these
camps. Hundreds of thousands more made fortunes
in post-war black-markets. "Gas-chambers" that did
not exist were photographed, and a "gasmobile" was
invented to titillate the mechanically-minded.

Keep this in mind if you doubt Ron Paul is a Nazi: Ron Paul
traced back to Carto who traced back to Yockey who traced back to
ODESSA and ODESSA traced back to Hitler so Paul can be traced
back to Hitler, because that is where this mild mannered pediatrician
is really coming from. But the way Carto describes Liberty Lobby it
has no connection with Hitlerism and German Nazism:

Liberty Lobby: A united voice for patriotic Americans.

Liberty Lobby was conceived in 1955 as a pressure
group for patriotism -- a lobby to fight the organized,


special-interest lobbies (both foreign and domestic)
that proliferate in the nation's capital. Since then,
numerous other lobbies and groups have tried to
emulate that basic concept.

A decade after the war ended the Nazis began to regroup as a
lobby against Israel [foreign special interest lobbies] and against
American Jews [domestic special interest groups].

Not only was Liberty Lobby intended to function as a
lobbying force in the nation's capital, but also as a
source of information and as a clearing house for
grassroots patriotic efforts around the country, both
complementing and uniting their efforts. From 1955-
1958 intensive coast-to-coast fund-raising efforts
were undertaken. Patriotic leaders from around the
nation closed ranks, eager to set the populist
Institution in motion.

The Nazis were offering their services to other racist, Jew-
hating groups such as the KKK and wished to form a broad coalition
against the Jews and Blacks.

A major advance came when on June 23, 1958,
Liberty Lobby's Research Department was
established. The Washington beachhead was thus
broached. On August 30, 1958, another milestone:
Liberty Lobby published the first congressional voting
analysis ever issued by a patriotic organization,
laying the groundwork for thousands of similar voting
records compiled yearly by others. Liberty Lobby
continues to issue its own Liberty Ledger, compiling
the voting records of all senators and congressmen.

The Nazis were conducting statistical analysis in order to
determine which members of Congress could be co-opted by them.


Liberty Lobby's first legislative victory came on March
6, 1959 - the fledgling populist lobby orchestrated
defeat of a Senate bill (drawn up by Rockefeller
Republican Senator Jacob Javits of New York) that
would have barred from the mails all citizen groups
which disagreed with the liberal Supreme Court.

Senator Javits wanted the U.S. Postal Service to declare Nazi
literature as obscene and not allow it to be disseminated through
the U.S. mail.

By mid-1959, a formal office for Liberty Lobby was
established in the nation’s capital. Col. Eugene
Pomeroy agreed to serve as the Washington
secretary of the office.

At a meeting in Washington’s Army-Navy Club in 1953, General
Pedro del Valle, Lieutenant Colonel John H. Coffman, USMC (Ret.);
and Lieutenant Colonel Eugene Cowles Pomeroy (Ret.) created
DAC, the Defenders of the American Constitution, electing del Valle
as president to spread the “anti-New World Order gospel” into the
highest ranks of the U.S. military hoping to instigate a military coup
against the Eisenhower Presidency. DAC claimed its main goal was
to purge the United States of any communist influence. The idea
behind the group was to allegedly organize the citizens in each
state as vigilantes against sabotage, terrorism and other forms of
treason, and give them a national voice. Actually these officers
hoped to form their own army just as Hitler had formed his own
private army called Sturm Abteilung (Storm Section). The SA (also
known as Stormtrooper or Brownshirts) were instructed to disrupt
the meetings of political opponents and to protect Hitler from
revenge attacks. Another thing that may have been going through
Carto’s evil mind was the possibility of a putsch, such as Hitler’s did
with the help of the military in the infamous Beer Hall Putsch. Carto


Shortly thereafter, the populist Institution's founding
Board of Policy (BOP) was set in motion, composed
of a group of highly selected patriots of national
stature. Founding chairman of the BOP was the late
Col. Curtis B. Dall who assumed the post in 1960.

Spotlight’s publisher and editors, like all
Nazis, hated FDR because he instituted
lend-lease and ultimately brought America
to war against the Axis powers. Spotlight
contained numerous so-called exposes
about FDR and even hired Col. Curtis B.
Dall, the former son-in-law of FDR, as its
front man. Dall was active in New York
City’s social life hosting cotillions and fund
raisers for various causes as he was married to FDR’s daughter
when FDR was Governor of New York. Dall had become active in
politics in the 1940's and in 1948 campaigned for Dixiecrat Strom
Thurmond, who was the Presidential nominee of the racist States'
Rights Party. In July 1964 Dall was the head of the Constitution
Party that supported the racist George Wallace when he ran for
president.36 As documented later in this book Ron Paul was a
supporter of the Constitution Party. Because of his social position
the New York Time’s obituary for Dall described Spotlight as “an
anti-Communist organization.” Carto continues:

Treasurer of Liberty Lobby is Willis A. Carto. He has
held that office since he founded the Institution in
1955. On November 24, 1960 the first issue of the
monthly Liberty Letter (a newsletter which ultimately
evolved into the weekly Spotlight newspaper) was



released. The purpose of Liberty Letter was unique,
in that it was designed to promote political action, not
just education. At this time there were just 2,000
subscribers. On January 22, 1966, control of Liberty
Lobby's Board of Policy was turned over to
Americans who signed an oath of loyalty to the U.S.
constitution and who pledged regular financial
support to Liberty Lobby.

What does the last part of this paragraph mean? Why would the
members of the Board of Policy have to be Americans and loyal to
the U. S. Constitution. Loyalty oaths were for communists. Carto is
hinting that he began receiving foreign funding for Liberty Lobby,
possibly from the Saudis. The Saudis quietly passed along money
to a variety of anti-Jewish groups, including those who purvey
Holocaust-denial literature. To take just one example, William
Grimstad, author of The Six Million Reconsidered, worked after
1977 as a registered Saudi agent. Noontide Press published the
Anti-Zion by William Grimstad.

Another possible source of Liberty Lobby and Spotlight funding
might have been Nazi gold. Raubgold, "stolen gold" is the gold
transferred by Nazi Germany to overseas banks during the Second
World War. The present whereabouts of Nazi gold that disappeared
into European banking institutions in 1945 is unknown. In addition to
the gold the Nazis also stole silver from the nations they conquered.
In 1973 Liberty Lobby established its popular silver minting and
selling division, Liberty Trust, today the oldest private mint in the
U.S. specializing in pure silver.

Since coming to Washington
in 1961, Liberty Lobby grew
exponentially: From 2,000 to
some 100,000 paid
members and subscribers at
present (although for several

years during the early 1980s paid circulation actually
surpassed one-third of a million readers); From one
unpaid employee to over 60 employees; From a
rented desk in the National Press Building to its own
headquarters two blocks from the Capitol Building;
From an annual operating budget of $10,000 to $5
million. Numerous major outreach efforts were also
undertaken during the subsequent several decades:
Issuance of a special 1964 campaign report, LBJ: A
Political Biography, which made history for this type
of publication by distributing 14 million copies,
published and they were distributed from several
locations around the country. As a result of the LBJ
report, Liberty Lobby's monthly The Liberty Letter
skyrocketed to some 150,000 subscribers - a
phenomenon unlike anything yet seen in the populist

LBJ: A Political Biography was a smear sheet that was put as a
paid insert in many local U.S. newspapers or distributed for free
door to door. Post-war Nazi literature had never received such
widespread dissemination before!

Publication of 48 special Emergency Liberty Letters
highlighting major legislative emergency campaigns,
urging patriots to take action on important matters
before Congress. Lobbying congressional offices and
appearing before congressional committees on a
regular basis. In 1965 a Liberty Lobby spokesman
appeared before congressional committees no less
than 15 times.

In the mid-1970s Liberty Lobby launched a daily
national radio program which, at its peak, a decade
later, was heard over more than 400 radio stations
around the country. Entitled This is Liberty Lobby, the

broadcast reached millions of Americans on a regular
basis and helped the populist Institution grow by
leaps and bounds.

In 1973 Liberty Lobby established its popular silver
minting and selling division, Liberty Trust, today the
oldest private mint in the U.S. specializing in pure

In 1975 the BOP voted to establish a national weekly
newspaper, now known as The Spotlight, to replace
the monthly Liberty Letter. (The Liberty Letter has
since re-emerged as a regular special green wrap-
around newsletter sent exclusively to members of the
BOP.) The Spotlight, received free by all BOP
members in good standing, soon evolved into "must"
reading for tens of thousands of Americans who
subscribe yearly.

In 1990 Liberty Lobby established the Populist Action
Committee, a non-partisan, Constitutionally-oriented,
America First PAC dedicated to helping patriots
seeking office not only on the Populist Party ticket,
but as independents and in the ranks of the major

The above is just a sketchy overview of some of the
populist Institution's major efforts over the years.

Throughout its history, Liberty Lobby has been
engaged in some of the big battles in official
Washington and around the country. Just to mention
a few: [Carto’s words now appear in bold type so we
can compare them to those of Ron Paul]

The fight against NAFTA and GATT for protection
of American jobs and industry;

Ron Paul co-sponsored this legislative bill:


To provide for the withdrawal of the United States
from the North American Free Trade Agreement. Be
it enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled,

(a) Withdrawal of Approval - Notwithstanding any
other provision of law, the approval of the NAFTA by
the Congress provided for in section 101 (a) of North
American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
shall cease to be effective beginning on the date that
is six months after the date of the enactment of this

Derailing the proposed Conference of the States,
another high-level scheme to dismantle the
American republic;

Efforts to expose Bilderbergers and Trilateralists
and the Council on Foreign Relations and their
insidious influence on world affairs.

On February 18, 2001, Ron Paul appeared on Radio Free
America, a show founded by Willis Carto. Radio Free America is
part of Carto’s American Free Press, which is labeled as a Nazi
group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The American Free
Press, which markets books like “The Invention of the Jewish
People” and “March of the Titans: A History of the White Race,”
urged its subscribers to help it send hundreds of copies of Ron



Paul’s collected speeches to voters in New Hampshire. The book, it
promises, will “Help Dr. Ron Paul Win the G.O.P. Nomination in
2012!” Paul discussed several conspiracy theories. A transcript of
the show was made available through Spotlight.

Here’s Mack calling from Georgia: The Trilateral
Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations
have a lot of power in choosing the American
President. Do you think our elections are just a fraud
on the people?

Paul: Almost no one gets elected who isn’t friendly
with the Trilateral Commission and the Council on
Foreign Relations. If you are not in tune with them,
the national media will crucify you. So you wouldn’t
win. I think the people allow themselves to be

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral
Commission plays into all sorts of conspiracy theories about world
government and control by the elite. This elite is often identified as
International Bankers, the Rothschild’s, Kuhn-Loeb, Goldman
Sachs; dog whistle words for Jews. Ron Paul:

You referred to who really pulls the strings. For years
now, it's been claimed by many, and there's pretty
good evidence, that those who are involved in the
Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign
Relations usually end up in positions of power. And I
believe this is true. If you look at the Federal
Reserve, if you look at key positions at the World
Bank or the IMF, they all come from these groups. If
you have national television on, you might see a big
debate about the Far East crisis, and you have

38. If you are not in tune with them, the national media will crucify you.


Brzezinski and Kissinger talking about how to do it.
One says don't invade today, invade tomorrow. And
the other says, invade immediately. That's the only
difference you find between the Rockefeller

Defeat of the proposed Constitutional convention
to rewrite the supreme law of the land;

Combating encroaching power grabs by United
Nations and other global government bodies that
undermine American sovereignty;

In 2006 Ron Paul opposed America’s membership and financing of
the United Nations and stated,

This new [UN Peacekeeping] commission will create
the beginning of a global UN army. It will claim the
right to intervene in any conflict anywhere on the
globe, bringing the World Bank and the IMF formally
into the picture as well. It is a complete new world

Promotion of an America First foreign policy,
particularly in the realm of Middle East affairs;

That meant cutting off all economic aid to Israel and siding with
its enemies. Ron Paul of course has proposed cutting off ALL
economic aid.


Defeat of the Atlantic Union, the purpose of
which was to merge the United States with
Western Europe;

Advancement of the concept of a "Taxpayers Bill
of Rights" (ultimately enacted into law);

On November 20, 2008 Ron Paul also expressed his
displeasure with the IRS in a New York Times interview:

I want to abolish the income tax, but I don’t want to
replace it with anything. About 45 percent of all
federal revenue comes from the personal income tax.
That means that about 55 percent — over half of all
revenue — comes from other sources, like excise
taxes, fees, and corporate taxes. We could eliminate
the income tax, replace it with nothing, and still fund
the same level of big government we had in the late
1990s. We don’t need to “replace” the income tax at
all. I see a consumption tax as being a little better
than the personal income tax, and I would vote for
the Fair-Tax if it came up in the House of
Representatives, but it is not my goal. We can do

Spearheading the drive for audit reform and the
ultimate abolition of the Federal Reserve banking

Ron Paul has stated:

Abolishing the Federal Reserve will allow Congress
to reassert its constitutional authority over monetary
policy. The United States Constitution grants to
Congress the authority to coin money and regulate
the value of the currency. The Constitution does not
give Congress the authority to delegate control over

monetary policy to a central bank. Furthermore, the
Constitution certainly does not empower the federal
government to erode the American standard of living
via an inflationary monetary policy.41

The fight for tougher immigration laws and
control of illegal aliens.

Ron Paul,

Illegal immigrants enter the country for the express
purpose of giving birth. But illegal immigrants also
use emergency rooms, public roads, and public
schools. In many cases they are able to obtain
Medicaid, food stamps, public housing, and even
unemployment benefits. We must end the perverse
incentives that encourage immigrants to come here
illegally, including the anchor baby incentive.42

These again are just a few of the highlights, but
they illustrate the essence of Liberty Lobby's
populist and nationalist agenda, a record of
consistency and success.




The Spotlight folded in 2001, due a dispute with
the Institute for Historical Review over the
money left to Carto by Jean Farrel Edison, the
granddaughter of Thomas Edison and the heir to
Thomas Alva Edison’s fortune. Jean Farrel
Edison died in 1985, leaving conflicting
instructions about the dispersal of her estate. A
handwritten will bequeathed the money then
estimated at $40 million to a South African-born woman who was
Edison's neighbor in Switzerland. Carto's Holocaust denial institute's
parent corporation, the Legion for the Survival of Freedom also had
a claim to the money because Edison left further instructions that
only a Legion representative could open the four safe deposit boxes
in Europe, Asia and the United States that contained cash
certificates for the money. Three of the boxes and $20 million in
certificates were found, according to Irwin Suall of the ADL, who
said the fourth box in Singapore was never located. The Legion and
the neighbor fought over the money in Swiss courts, finally splitting
the estate in 1990.

The Nazi Paul’s columns were then featured for several years
in the American Free Press - a publication of Willis Carto containing
the same crap that appeared in Spotlight. The American Free Press
sponsored a “First Amendment Festival” in Washington DC. Only
American Free Press subscribers could attend the event that
featured David Duke. Duke lambasted Jews throughout his speech
noting at one point that “the racial policies of Israel are more
extreme than the policies of National Socialist Germany.”

The bottom line here is that Ron Paul is part of a group of
crypto-Nazis Carto determined to create a situation where millions
of Jews are murdered. He is a potential Adolf Hitler, a Nazi bent on
genocide. He must be stopped.





Another reason for Ron Paul’s success is that he is the racist in
a country with a long history of racism. He is more dangerous than
the third party racist candidate Governor George Wallace. But, like
George Wallace, Ron Paul is a neo-Confederate, and proud
member of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which has been labeled
as a neo-Confederate organization. In a video with a Confederate
flag behind him Paul claimed that the North should have paid to buy
slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the
South renouncing slavery. Paul also failed to bring up the fact that it
was the South that started the war by attacking the North in 1861.
Paul had this to say about the Civil War and Civil Rights on
December 23, 2007:

Tim Russert: I was intrigued by your comments about
Abe Lincoln. "According to Paul, Abe Lincoln should
never have gone to war; there were better ways of
getting rid of slavery."

Paul: Absolutely. Six hundred thousand Americans
died in a senseless civil war. No, he shouldn't have
gone to war. He did this just to enhance and get rid of


the original intent of the republic. I mean, it was the
iron fist…

Russert: We'd still have slavery.

Paul: Oh, come on, Tim. Slavery was phased out in
every other country of the world. And the way I'm
advising that it should have been done is do like the
British Empire did. You buy the slaves and release
them. How much would that cost compared to killing
600,000 Americans and where it lingered for 100
years? I mean, the hatred and all that existed.
So every other major country in the world got rid of
slavery without a civil war. I mean, that doesn't sound
too radical to me. That sounds like a pretty
reasonable approach.

Paul believed that slavery was only an ancillary issue
in the Civil War:

While all Americans should be grateful that this
country finally extinguished slavery following the Civil
War, many scholars believe that the main issue in the
Civil War was the proper balance of power between
the states and the federal government. President
Lincoln himself made it clear that his primary
motivation was to preserve a strong central
government. For example, in a letter to New York
Tribune editor Horace Greeley in 1862, Lincoln said:
“My paramount object in this struggle is to save the
Union, and it is not either to save or destroy slavery.
If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I
would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and
leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do


about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I
believe it helps to save the Union.”43

You can find this quotation on numerous racist
websites to demonstrate that Lincoln hated Blacks.
What Paul was trying to tell Congress here was the
Abraham Lincoln was a racist who did not care about
slavery but used the issue to save the Union. The
Russert interview with Paul continues:

Let me ask you about race, because I, I read a
speech you gave in 2004, the 40th anniversary of the
Civil Rights Act. And you said this: "Contrary to the
claims of supporters of the Civil Rights Act of '64, the
act did not improve race relations or enhance
freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by
the Civil Rights Act of '64 increased racial tensions
while diminishing individual liberty." That act gave
equal rights to African-Americans to vote, to live, to
go to lunch counters, and you seem to be criticizing

Rep. Paul: Well, we should do this at a federal level,
at a federal lunch counter it'd be OK or for the
military. Just think of how the government, you know,
caused all the segregation in the military until after
World War II. Tim, you're, not compelled in your
house to invite strangers that you don't like. So it's a
property rights issue. And this idea that all private
property is under the domain of the federal
government I think is wrong. So this -- I think even
Barry Goldwater opposed that bill on the same
property rights position and now this thing is totally



out of control. If you happen to like to smoke a cigar,
you know the federal government's going to come
down and say you're not allowed to do this.

Russert: But you would vote against...

Russert: You would vote against the Civil Rights Act
if, if it was today?

Paul: If it were written the same way, where the
federal government's taken over property has nothing
to do with race relations. It just happens, Tim, that I
get more support from black people today than any
other Republican candidate, according to some
statistics. And I have a great appeal to people who
care about personal liberties and to those individuals
who would like to get us out of wars. So it has
nothing to do with racism, it has to do with the
Constitution and private property rights.

On July 3, 2004, Ron Paul was the only Congressman to vote
against a bill hailing the 40th anniversary of the 1964 Civil Rights

Mr. Speaker, I rise to explain my objection to H. Res.
676. I certainly join my colleagues in urging
Americans to celebrate the progress this country has
made in race relations. However, contrary to the
claims of the supporters of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 and the sponsors of H. Res. 676, the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or
enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration
dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased
racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federal
government unprecedented power over the hiring,
employee relations, and customer service practices

of every business in the country. The result was
a massive violation of the rights of private property
and contract, which are the bedrocks of free
society. The federal government has no legitimate
authority to infringe on the rights of private property
owners to use their property as they please and to
form (or not form) contracts with terms mutually
agreeable to all parties. The rights of all private
property owners, even those whose actions decent
people find abhorrent, must be respected if we are to
maintain a free society. This expansion of federal
power was based on an erroneous interpretation of
the congressional power to regulate interstate
commerce. The framers of the Constitution intended
the interstate commerce clause to create a free trade
zone among the states, not to give the federal
government regulatory power over every business
that has any connection with interstate commerce.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated the
Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also
failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial
harmony and a color-blind society. Federal
bureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see if
actions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the only
way the federal government could ensure an
employer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of
1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of a
business’s workforce matched the racial composition
of a bureaucrat or judge’s defined body of potential
employees. Thus, bureaucrats began forcing
employers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas have
not contributed to racial harmony or advanced the
goal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotas
encouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racial
strife. Of course, America has made great strides in

race relations over the past forty years. However, this
progress is due to changes in public attitudes and
private efforts. Relations between the races have
improved despite, not because of, the 1964 Civil
Rights Act. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I join in
sponsors of H. Res. 676 in promoting racial harmony
and individual liberty, the fact is the Civil Rights Act of
1964 did not accomplish these goals. Instead, this
law unconstitutionally expanded federal power, thus
reducing liberty. Furthermore, by prompting race-
based quotas, this law undermined efforts to achieve
a color-blind society and increased racial strife.
Therefore, I must oppose H. Res. 676.44

Ron Paul’s lifelong friend and close political associate, Lewellen
Rockwell argued that the Civil War "transformed the American
regime from a federalist system based on freedom to a centralized
state that circumscribed liberty in the name of public order."
Desegregation in the civil rights era, he says, resulted in the
"involuntary servitude" of white business owners. In the past,
Rockwell has praised the electoral success of European neofascists
like Joerg Haider in Austria and Christoph Blocher in Switzerland.

Both Rockwell and Von Mises Institute research director Jeffrey
Tucker are listed on the racist League of the South's Web page as
founding members. Tucker has written for League publications, and
many League members have taught at the Von Mises Institute's
seminars and given presentations at its conferences. One founding
League member who still sat on the board of directors in 2007 is
Jack Kershaw, a lifelong segregationist who once was an official in



the Klan sponsored racist White Citizens Councils of the 1950s and
1960s. Kershaw has never hidden his racist views. “Somebody
needs to say a good word for slavery,” Kershaw told a reporter in
1998. “Where in the world are the Negroes better off today than in
America?” Martin Luther King assassination patsy James Earl Ray
hired Jack Kershaw as his appeals attorney. Kershaw promoted
Ray's claim that he was not responsible for the shooting, which was
said to have been the result of a conspiracy of the otherwise
unidentified man named "Raoul."

This amalgamation of neo-confederates hides their racism
under the worn-out guise of State’s Rights. Paul warned his
followers that this dog whistle term has been recognized as such:

We must not allow the term "states' rights" to be
smeared and distorted into code words for
segregationist policies or racism. States’ rights simply
mean the individual states should retain
authority over all matters not expressly delegated to
the federal government in Article I of the Constitution.
Most of the worst excesses of big government can be
traced to a disregard for states' rights, which means
a disregard for the Ninth and Tenth amendments.
The real reason liberals hate the concept of states'
rights has nothing to do with racism, but rather
reflects a hostility toward anything that would act as a
limit on the power of the federal government. (What
Really Divides Us? December 24, 2002).

The Ninth Amendment stated “The enumeration in the
Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people.” The Tenth Amendment
stated, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the
States respectively, or to the people.” The Articles of Confederation
and the Constitution of the Confederate States both contained

similar language to these Amendments. Confederate racists like
Ron Paul not only want to kill Jews but they also want to bring back
segregation, lynchings and Jim Crow or better yet send African
Americans back to Africa. Ron Paul has a redneck cracker

John Patrick Bedell, the man who shot two police officers at the
Pentagon before being killed was a conspiracy theorist and fan of
the Ludwig von Mises Institute Facebook group. In an Internet
posting, a user named JPatrickBedell wrote he was determined to
see justice for the 1991 death of a Marine in California. The death
was ruled a suicide but has long been the source of cover-up
theories. The writer said the case would be a step toward revealing
the truth behind 9/11.

Paul opposes basic civil rights law - he maintains his opposition
to the 1964 Civil Rights Act and opposes restrictions on the
“freedom” of business owners to refuse service to blacks. So Paul’s
idea of freedom is the right to be racist. Paul is a faux libertarian
whose real agenda is not individualism but to prevent the federal
government from restraining the darker racist impulses at work at
the state and local levels. The following is from the Ron Paul

The Double Standard

We know about the crimes at Bensonhurst and
Howard Beach because of press propaganda and
because great oddities took place in each: white on
black crime. Virtually all inter-racial crime is black on
white, not white on black.

When blacks kill whites, however, it's not defined as
news. A month after the Bensonhurst killing, points
out Jared Taylor, an almost identical crime was
committed in the Bronx. A white got out of his car to
use a phone. Two blacks asked him what a honkey

was doing on Tremont Avenue, shouted at him, and
then shot him in the stomach.

There were “no marches, no outbursts, no
handwringing, and hardly any press coverage.” When
a black minister who helped stir up the Bensonhurst-
omania was asked about it, he said it wasn’t racism it
was “revenge.”

Race and Crime

We hear lots about black-on-black crime. But what
about interracial crime? One out of ten of those
crimes is white on black, whereas nine out of ten is
black on white. This is even more impressive, in a
negative sense, where you realize that blacks are
only 12% of the population.

Criminologist Jared Taylor reports that if you subtract
the crimes committed by blacks for the overall U.S.
crime rate, we have no more crime proportionately
than Western Europe and less than Britain.

Who is Jared Taylor? Jared Taylor is
a follower of the eugenicist William
Shockley who stated “My research
leads me inescapably to the opinion
that the major cause of the
American's Negros intellectual and
social deficits is hereditary and
racially genetic in origin and thus not
remediable to a major degree by practical improvements in
environment.”45 Shockley believed that the Nazi’s picked the wrong



race to mass murder as the Jews were intellectually superior to
most Germans. If you watch the Nazi propaganda film The Eternal
Jew you will find that some of the German hatred for Jews is based
on the fact that they came over to Germany with nothing and were
able to accumulate wealth by first starting out selling merchandise
from their pockets, then from a tray, then from a pushcart and finally
from a store or chain of stores. They became professionals like
doctors and lawyers while the German dunkoffs remained peasants.
Jared Taylor claims he has no problem with Jews and that they are
White however the Jewish Defense Organization of which I am a
member opposes all forms of racism. I have personally had Jared
Taylor’s racist meetings cancelled for two years in a row. Taylor
wants to sterilize Black women and has received grants from the
Pioneer Fund as has Willis Carto. The Pioneer Fund was started in
1937 and was closely aligned with Nazi Germany. Jared Taylor is
described as a “criminologist” by Ron Paul and his newsletter gave
out subscription information about Taylor’s publications. Llewellyn
Rockwell published Jared Taylor’s article “Hate Crimes Laws Miss
the Point Indeed, They are Instruments of Totalitarianism.”

Another way to get rid of people with African blood is to refuse
medical aid to Africa while it is experiencing an AIDS epidemic. On
July 24, 2008 Ron Paul stated:

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this irresponsible
legislation, which will ship $48 billion overseas as
foreign aid at a time when Americans are feeling the
pressure of rapidly increasing inflation and a
weakened dollar. It is particularly objectionable to
ship money to fund healthcare overseas when so
many Americans either struggle with high healthcare
costs or avoid seeking medical assistance altogether
due to lack of insurance or funds. As we know, the
federal government does not have $48 billion to send
overseas so it will have to print the money. It is a
cruel irony that this will add to inflation at home which

will increase even further the costs of healthcare in
the United States. Mr. Speaker, I am saddened by
the prevalence of disease in impoverished countries
overseas. I certainly encourage every American
concerned about HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria
overseas to voluntarily provide assistance to help
alleviate the problem. But I do not believe it is
appropriate -- nor is it Constitutional -- to forcibly take
money from American citizens to send abroad. I urge
my colleagues to reject this and all foreign aid

More Haitians?

If there is one thing we don’t need in this country, its
more Haitians immigrants with AIDS. Congratulations
to the Senate for stopping, at least temporarily,
Clinton’s plan to have the AIDSians move here to die
at $100,000 a pop, courtesy of the taxpayers. But
what does it tell us about Clinton that he would like all
the Haitians, AIDS carriers and otherwise, to go on
U.S. welfare in Florida? That he hates the real

Jesse Jackson went on a hunger strike to protest the
idea of keeping the Haitians in Haiti, or at least out of
the U.S. Unfortunately he went off the diet. As usual
his motive seems to be pure malice toward white

Paul didn’t want to help the Haitians out after a devastating
earthquake. On January 21, 2010 he claimed that this was for



financial reasons but as you can see from the above excerpt from
his newsletter he hated Haitians long before this national disaster

I rise in reluctant opposition to this resolution.
Certainly I am moved by the horrific destruction in
Haiti and would without hesitation express
condolences to those who have suffered and
continue to suffer. As a medical doctor, I have
through my career worked to alleviate the pain and
suffering of others. Unfortunately, however, this
resolution does not simply express our condolences,
but rather it commits the US government “to begin
the reconstruction of Haiti” and affirms that “the
recovery and long-term needs of Haiti will require a
sustained commitment by the United States….” I do
not believe that a resolution expressing our deep
regret and sorrow over this tragedy should be used to
commit the United States to a “long-term” occupation
of Haiti during which time the US government will
provide for the reconstruction of that country. I am
concerned over the possibility of an open-ended US
military occupation of Haiti and this legislation does
nothing to alleviate my concerns. On the contrary,
when this resolution refers to the need for a long term
US plan for Haiti, I see a return to the failed attempts
by the Clinton and Bush Administrations to establish
Haiti as an American protectorate. Already we are
seeing many argue that this kind of humanitarian
mission is a perfect fit for the US military. I do not
agree. Certainly I would support and encourage the
efforts of the American people to help the people of
Haiti at this tragic time. I believe that the American
people are very generous on their own and fear that
a US government commitment to reconstruct Haiti


may actually discourage private contributions. Mr.
Speaker, already we see private US citizens and
corporations raising millions of dollars for relief and
reconstruction of Haiti. I do not believe the US
government should get in the way of these laudable
efforts. I do express my condolences but I
unfortunately must urge my colleagues to vote
against this resolution committing the United States
government to rebuild Haiti.47

In Stay out of Sudan's Civil War House Amendments to
Comprehensive Peace in Sudan Act 11/19/04 he stated:

The fact is we do not know and cannot understand
the complexities of the civil war in Sudan, which has
lasted for 39 of that country’s 48 years of existence.
Supporters of our intervention in Sudan argue that
this is a clear-cut case of Sudan’s Christian minority
being oppressed and massacred by the Arab majority
in the Darfur region. It is interesting that the CIA’s
World Factbook states that Sudan’s Christians, who
make up five percent of the population, are
concentrated in the south of the country. Darfur is a
region in the mid-western part of Sudan. So I wonder
about this very simplistic characterization of the

Paul’s newsletters were filled with racist attacks on blacks:
“Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to
pick up their welfare checks,” read a typical article from the June




1992 “Special Issue on Racial Terrorism,” a supplement to the Ron
Paul Political Report. Racial apocalypse was the most persistent
theme of the newsletters; a 1990 issue warned of “The Coming
Race War.” George Lincoln Rockwell, the neo-Nazi leader of the
American Nazi Party:

Believed a race war was imminent. He expressed
horror at the prospect of interracial carnage on
American soil but actually welcomed it as a
necessary element of the social chaos that would
sweep him to power. “Commander Rockwell was
positive” a follower wrote, that the Blacks were going
to go on an all-out rampage before the decade of the
Sixties as out, and touch off the race war that so
many talked about in those days," To a boyhood
friend not involved in American Nazi Party politics
Rockwell confided: "I am convinced that the world is
building to a Race War, in which we are outnum-
bered ten to one, we are divided and decadent, while
the colored races are hard and getting harder.” The
terror of that race war Rockwell believed would drive
the American people to turn to him as the only
politician tough enough to protect their interests. For
Rockwell, the coming race war was but one battle in
the larger war with the Jew.49

On August 30, 1979 Paul praised the magazine The American
Mercury: “Mr. Bruce, I found all the articles you sent me from the
American Mercury very interesting.”



Russell Maguire, who owned the Thompson Submachine
Gun Company, became owner of the American Mercury in August
1952. In 1952 George Lincoln Rockwell became its editor. Maguire
sold the Mercury to the Defenders of the Christian Faith, Inc., owned
by Reverend Winrod and located in Wichita, Kansas, in 1961.
Reverend Winrod was known as "The Jayhawk Nazi" during World
War II, and was tried and convicted for violations of the Sedition Act
of 1918. In 1966 the magazine merged with Willis Carto and Roger
Pearson’s Western Destiny. Pearson was a well known neo-Nazi
and pro-Fascist who headed up the World Anti-Communist
League during its most blatantly pro-Fascist periods. Pearson was a
close associate of Wickliffe Draper, founder of the Pioneer Fund and
was the largest recipient of Pioneer Fund grants in history. By
then The American Mercury was a quarterly with a circulation of
barely 7,000, and its editorial content was composed almost entirely
of attacks upon Jews, African Americans, and other minorities.

A 1978 American Mercury article praised Adolf Hitler as the
"greatest Spenglerian." The spring 1980 issue celebrated H. L.
Mencken's centennial, and lamented the passage of his era, "before
the virus of social, racial, and sexual equality" grew in "fertile soil in
the minds of most Americans." The issue of The American
Mercury Paul praised included essays entitled, “You Can't Escape
the Kosher Food Tax,” “Are You Ready for the White Man's
Doomsday,” and “Racism - Black African Style.” The last issue
concluded with a plea for contributions to build a computer index —
with information about the 15,000 most dangerous political activists,
actual or alleged, in the United States.

An article the following year in the Ron Paul / Willis Carto
newsletter was about disturbances in the Adams Morgan
neighborhood of Washington, D.C., and was entitled Animals Take
Over the D.C. Zoo. Another newsletter reported on the heretofore
unknown phenomenon of “Needlin’,” in which “gangs of black girls
between the ages of 12 and 14” roamed the streets of New York
and injected white women with possibly HIV-infected syringes.


“Needlin’,” a new form of racial terrorism, has struck
New York City streets on the Upper West Side. At
least 39 white women have been stuck with used
hypodermic needles–perhaps infected with AIDS–by
gangs of black girls between the ages of 12 and 14.
The New York Times didn’t find this fit to print for
weeks and weeks, until its candidate David Dinkins
was safely elected. Even then the story was very low
key, with race mentioned many paragraphs into it.

Who can doubt that if the situation had been
reversed, if white girls had done this to black women,
we would have been subjected to months-long
nation-wide propaganda campaign on the evils of
white America? The double standard strikes again.

Another newsletter stated:

Today, gangs of young blacks bust into a bank lobby
firing rounds at the ceiling. We don’t think a child of
13 should be held as responsible as a man of 23.
That’s true for most people, but black males age 13
who have been raised on the streets and who have
joined criminal gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary
and culpable as any adult, and should be treated as

Paul vilified Dr. Martin Luther King Jr:

So now even the establishment press admits that
Martin Luther King plagiarized his PhD dissertation,
his academic articles, his speeches, and his


He was also a comsymp, if not an actual party
member, and the man who replaced the evil of forced
segregation with the evil of forced integration.

King, the FBI files show, was not only a world-class
adulterer, he also seduced underage girls and boys.
The Rev. Ralph David Abernathy revealed before his
death that King had made a pass at him many years

And we are supposed to honor this "Christian
Minister" and lying socialist satyr with a holiday that
puts him on par with George Washington?

Congratulations to Arizona! Who could doubt that the
result would be exactly the same if the other 49
states could also vote on a holiday for this affirmative
action saint?

Paul attacked Ronald Reagan for signing legislation creating
the federal holiday in his name, complaining, “We can thank him for
our annual Hate Whitey Day.” Paul had this to say about King:

St. Martin was a world-class philanderer who beat
up his paramours ("non-violence" didn't apply in all
spheres, I guess). He was a flagrant plagiarist with
a phony doctorate. He replaced forced
segregation in a few states with forced integration
in all states. And he was a dedicated socialist.
What a guy. He probably deserves two holidays.

Why, he often asked "is it that people have to pay
water bills in a world that is two-thirds water?"
(Forget a PhD. Give this man an IQ test.)

Capitalism, he said, has "left a gulf between
superfluous wealth and abject poverty, has

created conditions permitting necessities to be
taken from the many to give luxuries to the few,
and has encouraged small hearted men to
become cold and conscienceless." As
compensation, he advocated paying blacks "about
fifty billion" -- $250 billion in today's dollars -- per
year for ten years, although all the wealth in the
country "could not adequately compensate its
Negroes for his centuries of exploitation and

King advocated racial quotas: "If a city has a 30%
Negro population," then "Negroes should have at
least 30% of the jobs in any particular company,
and join in all categories."

And David Garrow's Pulitzer Prize-winning
biography reports that King "made it clear to close
friends" that he considered himself a Marxist."

Even his ballyhooed "non-violence" was a tactic.
He wanted to take power like Castro did, "but a
violent revolution on the part of American blacks
would find no sympathy and support from the
white population." So he adopted non-violence as
a "strategy for change, a tactical program."

The official line among some conservatives and
libertarians is that the civil rights movement
started out well, but went astray after King's death.
In fact, it was bad from the beginning, never
seeking the mere removal of Jim Crow laws,
which would have been legitimate, but forced
integration and wealth redistribution.

In 1988 when I ran for president on the Libertarian
Party ticket, I was berated for hours by LP

members because I had refused to vote, while in
Congress, for a Martin Luther King national

I didn't know then about his plagiarism, but the
rest of King's crimes were clear. J. Edgar Hoover
once called his "the most dangerous man in
America." Who could have known the danger
would continue after his death and threaten to
strangle our culture?

Perhaps, the most damnable lie that Ron Paul
tells about race in the US is his claim that Martin
Luther King and Rosa Parks are amongst his
greatest heroes. Of course, there's not an ounce
of truth in either claim. For one thing, he voted
against honoring either of them - twice against
making King's birthday a holiday, and once
against honoring Rosa Parks with the
Congressional Gold Medal. In 2012 the lying racist
pig said this:

One of my heroes is Martin Luther King because
he practiced the libertarian principle of peaceful
resistance and peaceful civil disobedience, as did
Rosa Parks. But also, I’m the only one up here —
and the only one in the Republican Party — that
understands true racism in this country is in the
judicial system, and it has to do with enforcing the
drug laws. Look at the percentages. The
percentage of people who use drugs are about the
same with blacks and whites. And yet the blacks
are arrested way disproportionately.

“Arrested disproportionately?” Paul really believes that they are
not as he stated:


Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls
the criminal justice system, I think we can safely
assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city
are semi-criminal or entirely criminal. We are
constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men,
it is hardly irrational.

After Barak Obama was re-elected by a few populous states some
people in the states that went for Romney began talking secession.
Paul was widely quoted on the subject:

Actually, after the Civil War, nobody believes there is
a so-called right to secession, but it is a very
legitimate issue to debate because all of the states
that came into the Union before the Civil War
believed they have a right to secede and New
England in the early part of the 19th century actually
considered it, and nobody questioned them about
whether they had the right to do it or not.

Since the Civil War, it’s been sort of a dead issue, but
he brought it up. It stirred the media and believe me,
it really stirred some of the liberal media where they
started really screaming about what is going on here.
“This is un-American”, I heard one individual say,
“This is treasonous to even talk about it.”



A close aide to Sen. Rand Paul (R., Ky.)
who co-wrote the senator’s 2011 book
spent years working as a neo-Confederate
racist. Paul hired Jack Hunter, 39, to
help write his book The Tea Party Goes to
Washington during his 2010 Senate run.
Hunter joined Paul’s office as his social
media director in August 2012. From 1999
to 2012, Hunter was a South Carolina
radio shock jock known as the “Southern
Avenger.” He has weighed in on issues
like racial pride and Hispanic immigration, and stated support for
the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln.

Prior to his radio career, while in his 20s, Hunter was a
chairman in the League of the South, which “advocates the
secession and subsequent independence of the Southern States
from this forced union and the formation of a Southern republic.”

“The League of the South is an implicitly racist group in that the
idealized version of the South that they promote is one which, to use
their ideology, is dominated by ‘Anglo-Celtic’ culture, which is their
code word for ‘white’,”50

The League of the South is connected with the Mises Institute
which is run by Lew Rockwell and Ron Paul. Thomas Woods, a
prominent Rockwellian, is a founding member of the League of the
South. Another prominent Rockwellian identified as a League
member is Charley Reese. He is part of the ultra-Catholic group that
revolves around Rockwell.



The Southern Patriot Shop is owned by the League of the
South which paid $158,000 for the building. The manager is David
Sutter. All this is easily confirmed via League of South web sites.
Joshua Caleb Sutter, is an employee and the son of David.

Now David Sutter is not unknown in among Nazi scum. He was
a major activist in the Aryan Nations. He called himself Wulfran Hall,
High Counsel of Aryan Nations. Sutter lived at the compound of the
Aryan Nation for awhile. And when the group split the new leader,
and Sutter’s mentor, August Kreis, moved the headquarters to a
trailer not far from the Southern Patriot Shop.

Joshua Sutter was previously arrested when he tried to
purchase a firearm with the serial number ground off. Sutter also
was a member of the Church of the Sons of Yaweh, a racialist
Identity church, that preaches that only whites have souls and that
Jews are the physical offspring of Satan. After the 9/11 attacks
Sutter was appointed by the Aryan Nations as their Minister for
Islamic Liaison. His job was to start building alliances with radical
Islamic groups.51

“[T]he Southern League supports a return to a political and social
system based on kith and kin rather than an impersonal state
wedded to the idea of the universal rights of man. At its core is a
European population.” — Michael Hill, essay on League of the
South website, 2000

The League of the South is connected with Occidental Dissent,
a group that believes Africans are subhumans. The group compares
Black people to Chimpanzees. These are hardcore racist Nazi pigs
but what do you expect? Ron and Rand are both crypto-Nazis.





Ron Paul is estimated to have 150 to 200 delegates bound to
him at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida plus
control over four state delegations. According to RNC Rule 40, Paul
needed a plurality of delegates from five states for his name to be
put forth for nomination at the convention. Nebraska was the last
state to hold a convention and its 32 delegates were not required to
match the primary, where Romney won 70% of the vote. However,
prospective delegates must indicate their presidential preference
and are bound to vote for that candidate for the first two ballots.
Paul failed to win a plurality of delegates in Nebraska in fact he only
won one! Had he succeeded it would have forced a roll call vote
where each delegate of each state would have been polled on the
floor of the convention. If Paul had succeeded in Nebraska it also
would have meant getting a prime time 15-minute speaking slot,
perhaps a promise of a Cabinet position, and, of course, influencing
the GOP platform to further his Crypto-Nazi agenda. Since this was
Paul’s last chance to pull off a bloodless putsch and become
President, Nebraska Republican Party officials, for the first time,


hired security52 for the convention to ward off any disruptions that
have occurred at state conventions such as the one in Arizona,
where Paul supporters got into a shouting match with Romney


Although he got about 11% of the Republican
Primary popular vote53 Paul was able to amass a
disproportionate number of delegates to the
Republican Convention by poaching the votes
where the delegates were unbound. In this way
these “libertarians” were able to deprive citizens of
their liberty to elect the candidates of their choice. The liberty to
deprive others of their liberty is the liberty of Ron Paul and his
robot like storm troopers.

In Louisiana Paul’s slime balls did a great job of “spreading
liberty” and deprived people of the right to have their vote count.
Paul received only 6% of the popular vote yet Paul dominated the
Louisiana Republican caucuses. He captured 27 of the 46
delegates to which Louisiana is entitled. Paul supporters also
elected one of their own, Henry Herford, to a senior party post.
Week after week, Paul forces use GOP rules54 to dominate or exert
a large influence at state Republican conventions and send pro-
Paul delegates to the national GOP convention.55 Louisiana was no


fluke. At the Nevada Republican convention Paul won 22 of a
possible 25 delegates to the national convention yet he came in
third with less than 19 percent of the vote. In Iowa after what the
Des Moines Register described as a "two-day tug-of-war marked by
bouts of angry shouting,"56 Paul supporters walked away with 23 of
28 total delegates to send to Augusts’ Republican National
Convention in Tampa, Florida.57

How do these Ron Paul Stormtroopers manage to round up
delegates? Through physical intimidation! In Saint Peters County
Missouri a Blackman, Eugene Dokes, who, as chairman of the
county's GOP committee, played a key role in leading the caucus.
But Dokes said he grew concerned Saturday after supporters of
White House hopeful Ron Paul were "beginning to get physical." "At
one point there was four or five people surrounding me," Dokes
recalled Sunday. "I didn't think it was safe." This is how a Nazi who
used the name Lone Guard was there as a Ron Paul supporter and
later posted,

The lying, cowardly negro who single handedly
embarrassed the GOP by shutting down the largest
caucus in Missouri because he didn't want any Ron
Paul delegates is now claiming Ron Paul supporters
are threatening his family, according to Brent
Stafford, the man who Dokes had arrested.

Ron Paul’s followers were able to subvert democracy by
misusing the Electoral College system. This does not bother them.
Democracy is something they profess to disbelieve in. Yet, at the
same time, Ron Paul’s storm trooper’s claim they want a
Jeffersonian democracy.



Thomas Jefferson favored a nation with most powers reserved
for the states. He was opposed to a strong central authority and
believed that the people were the final authority in government.
Hamilton believed that the government should be run by those who
were educated and wealthy rather than by “the mob.” Before my
DNS was banned from the website the Daily Paul I noticed
numerous posts that stated: “This is a Republic not a Democracy.”
Republic is a buzzword for where it is permissible for a minority to
rule over a majority through an Electoral College system. In reality
all the word Republic means is that a country is not an aristocracy.
We are both a Republic and Democracy. So the Pauloids are elitists
and Hamiltonians, not Jeffersonians. They are also found of this
quotation “James Madison said Democracy is the tyranny of the
majority.” This is from The Daily Paul:

Even though Ron Paul lost the popular vote in every
state so far, he has now won the majority of the
delegates in 11 states. And the delegate count
happens to be the only thing that matters when it
comes to electing nominees. Thank you Founding
Fathers for the Electoral College system. And thank
you Ron Paul people who have used that system as
the Founding Fathers' intended.58

Ron Paul supporters have no compunctions about their
activities because they are not libertarians. Libertarians would not
be depriving people of their liberty, their freedom to choose political
leaders by depriving them of their vote. The Founding Fathers
intended to use the Electoral College System to protect democracy
from the Irish urban poor turning it into mob rule. The voters the
Pauloids disenfranchised were middle class Republican voters, not
the illiterate Black Irish the Founding Fathers had in mind. The
Pauloids are not using the system, they are playing the system.


The Nazis are old hands at subverting democracy. They did it in
Germany with the passage of the Enabling Act. The Enabling Act
was passed by Germany's Reichstag and signed by President Paul
von Hindenburg on March 23, 1933. It was the second major step,
after the Reichstag Fire Decree, through which Chancellor Adolf
Hitler legally obtained plenary powers and established his
dictatorship. It received its name from its legal status as an enabling
act granting the Cabinet the authority to enact laws without the
participation of the Reichstag. If the Pauloids took control of
Congress they could conceivably do it here, although it would
require a Constitutional Amendment. What sociological groups
comprise Ron Paul’s supporters? One group of Ron Paul Slime
balls is comprised of hardcore Nazi scum, like Don Black and his
son see with Paul on the following page.


The mass murderer of six people in Wisconsin
at a Sikh temple, Wade Michael Page, was a
participant in bands that performed Nazi and
skinhead music. Page started two bands –
Definite Hate and End Apathy. These bands
were heavily advertised on Don Black’s
website, Stormfront. Interestingly enough the
slogan end apathy is often used by Ron Paul
followers as you can see HERE. This group of Ron Paul supporters
consists of racists, fascists, eugenicists, Skinheads, Klansmen and
Nazis. They realized that a vote for Ron Paul, even though he
doesn’t spell it out, is a vote to kill Jews and deport Blacks. These
vermin know that the only difference between Ron Paul and Adolf
Hitler is that Hitler put his platform forward in plain German, shouted
it at the German people and made it clear to them that all the Jews
in Europe were going to die under his rule. Millions of Germans
understood what the final solution to the Jewish problem meant and
supported it. These post-war hardcore Jew-haters understand that
Paul can’t announce that publically here and get away with it. The
media, the ADL, WWII veterans would be all over him. It would be
political suicide. These wanna be mass murderers know that Ron
Paul is forced to candy-coat his Nazi beliefs using dog whistle words
like “no foreign entanglements” when he means disown Israel and
let it be destroyed.

Dog-whistle politics, also known as the use of code words, is a
term for a type of political campaigning or speechmaking which
employs coded language that appears to mean one thing to the
general population but has a different or more specific meaning for a
targeted subgroup of the audience. The term is used to refer to
messages with an intentional subtext. The key to its use is to
maintain the option of "plausible deniability." For example the
phrase "states' rights", although literally referring to powers of
individual state governments in the United States, are "code words"
for institutionalized segregation and racism.


In January 2012 Ron Paul was a hot topic on the talk radio
show hosted by Nazis Don Black and his son Derek. But Paul and
Black go back further than that. In 1981, a lawyer tried to subpoena
Ron Paul to testify in the trial of Black,59 then a Grand Wizard for the
Ku Klux Klan who would later go on to found the white supremacist,
neo-Nazi website, Stormfront. Black was charged along with two
other Klansmen with planning to violently overthrow the small
Caribbean country of Dominica in what they called Operation Red
Dog. An examination of Operation Red Dog revealed that in 1981 a
group of American and Canadian White supremacists led by
Klansman and mercenary, Michael (Mike) Perdue planned on taking
over a small West Indian country called Dominica by overthrowing
the government and Prime Minister Eugenia Charles and restoring
its previous prime minister, Patrick Johns into power. The group
planned to create an Aryan paradise in Dominica and make money
through casinos, cocaine and brothels.60

On the day the group of white supremacists was supposed to
travel to Dominica, they were arrested by ATF agents and were
found with over thirty automatic weapons, shotguns, rifles,
handguns, dynamite, ammunition, a confederate flag and a Nazi
flag. The plan would be dubbed The Bayou of Pigs after the failed
invasion of Cuba.

The leader of the group, Michael Perdue, would plead guilty to
planning the coup and turned state’s evidence. Perdue would testify
that several other people helped organize and fund the coup and
that two Texas politicians were aware of the plan. Among those
Perdue implicated were David Duke, former Texas Governor, John
Connally and Congressman, Ron Paul whom he claimed knew


60. The Ku Klux Klan in Mississippi: A History By Michael Newton Page


about the plot. Connally was credited with helping Paul win his first
congressional election.61

A judge refused to subpoena Paul and Connally despite the fact
that Perdue had claimed that both of them were aware of the plot.
Don Black’s friend and fellow KKK Grand Wizard, David Duke was
called to testify before a grand jury but claimed that he would take
the Fifth Amendment and never appeared. While Duke was never
charged with a crime, several books points to Duke as the organizer
who connected Perdue to the other mercenary Klansmen and the
people who funded their endeavor.62 Everyone else implicated by
Perdue was charged with the plot.

Perdue implicated three men as funders of the plot, L .E.
Matthews of Jackson, Mississippi, James C. White of Houston, and
David Duke’s close friend and backer, J. W. Kirkpatrick. Kirkpatrick
would kill himself before he could stand trial and White and
Matthews would be acquitted in court. Former Prime Minister of
Dominica, Patrick Johns would be sentenced to 12 years in prison
for his part of the plot. Michael Perdue, Don Black and seven other
Klansmen would be sentenced to only 3 years in prison. Ron Paul
has never made a statement denying knowledge of the plot despite
the fact that he was implicated by Perdue and almost subpoenaed.

Paul was photographed with Black and his son by David Duke’s
former assistant, Jamie Kelso63 who was an organizer for Ron
Paul and the owner of white supremacist sites,


62. The Rise of David Duke By Tyler Bridges page 98


and and a moderator for Black’s neo-Nazi
website, Stormfront.64

Black would become one of Paul’s most enthusiastic supporters
and helped rally the white supremacist community around Paul,
through Stormfront. Black said he received Paul’s Nazi newsletters
when they were first published and described how the publications
were perceived by members of the Nazi movement. KKK
Grand Wizard and former Louisiana Congressman David Duke
phoned in to Don Black’s internet radio show and explained why
he’s voting for Paul. Black told him:

Everybody, all of us back in the 80’s and 90’s, felt
Ron Paul was, you know, unusual in that he had
actually been a Congressman, that he was one of us
and now, of course, that he has this broad
demographic–broad base of support.

Black donated to Mr. Paul in 2007 and in 2011 it was revealed
that Black donated $500 dollars to the Ron Paul Presidential
campaign. Black told The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur that he
supported Paul’s presidential candidacy.65 Ron Paul’s campaign
refused to reject the donation and return it. This is from Stormfront:

Re: Is Ron Paul listening to David Duke's radio in his
closet? Ron Paul could certainly be a White
Nationalist, but if he ever made any sign of this he
would be done. The second the public hears "white
nationalist", they immediately think of "NAZI"
"RACIST" "HOLOCAUST", and Ron Paul would be
over with. Regardless of his views though; he is
certainly on our side.


Paul was asked about this: “If they want to endorse me, they’re
endorsing what I do or say — it has nothing to do with endorsing
what they say.” But if the Nazis are endorsing what Paul has to say
there must be some areas of agreement between them.

Paul received support from other White Supremacist groups:
When Anonymous hacked a white supremacist website known as
American 3rd Position (A3P) the anti-Nazi fighters discovered:

In addition to finding the usual racist rants and
interactions with other white power groups, we also
found a disturbingly high amount of members who
are also involved in campaigning for Ron Paul.
According to these messages, Ron Paul has
regularly met with many A3P members, even
engaging in conference calls with their board of
directors. We put extra effort in ruining the life of A3P
webmaster Jamie Kelso. On top of being on the
board of directors of A3P, former scientologist, and
high ranking Ron Paul organizer, he also is the
account owner of German Nazi forums and store nsl-, We went ahead and
wiped those websites off the internet as well,
dumping private messages and order information.

Paul met with Bill Johnson, the chairman of A3P. Johnson
wrote a 1989 book, under the name James O. Pace, called
"Amendment to the Constitution," backing what became known as
the Pace Amendment. Here it is, in part:

No person shall be a citizen of the
United States unless he is a non-
Hispanic white of the European
race, in whom there is no
ascertainable trace of Negro blood,
nor more than one-eighth


Mongolian, Asian, Asia Minor, Middle Eastern,
Semitic, Near Eastern, American Indian, Malay or
other non-European or non-white blood. Hispanic
whites, defined as anyone with an Hispanic ancestor,
may be citizens if, in addition to meeting the
aforesaid ascertainable trace and percentage tests,
they are in appearance indistinguishable from
Americans whose ancestral home is the British Isles
or Northwestern Europe. Only citizens shall have the
right and privilege to reside permanently in the United

Ron Paul endorsed Bill Johnson for a seat on the Los Angeles
Superior Court in 2008. Paul would retract his endorsement
after Johnson’s racist views were made public. In e-mails Jamie
Kelso boasted of being asked to be Johnson’s “personal assistant”
and referred to Johnson as “Ron Paul’s top man in Southern
California for the last 3 years.”

Bill Johnson and I will be meeting with Ron Paul. I
have a teleconference call with Bill (and Ron Paul)
tonight. Much more later. Things are starting to
happen (thanks to folks like you). I’ll be at CPAC from
Feb. 9 to Feb. 12. I’ll send back reports to you from
personal meetings with Ron Paul and many others.
It’ll be here on WhiteNewsNow, a place that is really
starting to get interesting because of the presence of
folks like you. Birds of a feather flock together, and
we are really gathering some quality here.

The militia types also support Paul: Three months before far-
right terrorists killed 168 Americans in Oklahoma City; Paul’s
newsletter praised the “1,500 local militias now training to defend
liberty” as “one of the most encouraging developments in America.”
And he offered specific advice to antigovernment militia members,
such as, “Keep the group size down,” “Keep quiet and you’re harder

to find,” “Leave no clues,” “Avoid the phone as much as possible,”
and “Don’t fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let
it begin here.” Timothy McVeigh, using the alias "T. Tuttle,"
advertised for sale a military style launcher in the crypto-Nazi
newspaper The Spotlight that repeatedly featured Paul. The ad,
which appeared in the August 16, 1993 issue and two subsequent
issues, offered for sale a "LAW launcher replica" which "fires 37 mm
flares," as well as the flares themselves which can be modified for
explosive use. (LAW stands for "light anti-tank weapon.")

Paul, a Nazi who is planning hate crimes beyond most people’s
comprehension, opposed Hate Crimes legislation:

Last week, the House of Representatives acted with
disdain for the Constitution and individual liberty by
passing HR 1592, a bill creating new federal
programs to combat so-called “hate crimes.” The
legislation defines a hate crime as an act of violence
committed against an individual because of the
victim's race, religion, national origin, gender, sexual
orientation, gender identity, or disability. Federal hate
crime laws violate the Tenth Amendment's limitations
on federal power. Hate crime laws may also violate
the First Amendment guaranteed freedom of speech
and religion criminalizing speech federal bureaucrats
define as “hateful.”

There is no evidence that local governments are
failing to apprehend and prosecute criminals
motivated by prejudice, in comparison to the
apprehension and conviction rates of other crimes.
Therefore, new hate crime laws will not significantly
reduce crime. Instead of increasing the effectiveness
of law enforcement, hate crime laws undermine equal
justice under the law by requiring law enforcement
and judicial system officers to give priority to

investigating and prosecuting hate crimes. Of course,
all decent people should condemn criminal acts
motivated by prejudice. But why should an assault
victim be treated by the legal system as a second-
class citizen because his assailant was motivated by
greed instead of hate?

HR 1592, like all hate crime laws, imposes a longer
sentence on a criminal motivated by hate than on
someone who commits the same crime with a
different motivation. Increasing sentences because of
motivation goes beyond criminalizing acts; it makes it
a crime to think certain thoughts. Criminalizing even
the vilest hateful thoughts — as opposed to willful
criminal acts — is inconsistent with a free society.

HR 1592 could lead to federal censorship of religious
or political speech on the grounds that the speech
incites hate. Hate crime laws have been used to
silence free speech and even the free exercise of
religion. For example, a Pennsylvania hate crime law
has been used to prosecute peaceful religious
demonstrators on the grounds that their public Bible
readings could incite violence. One of HR 1592's
supporters admitted that this legislation could allow
the government to silence a preacher if one of the
preacher's parishioners commits a hate crime. More
evidence that hate crime laws lead to censorship
came recently when one member of Congress
suggested that the Federal Communications
Commission ban hate speech from the air waves.
Hate crime laws not only violate the First
Amendment, they also violate the Tenth Amendment.
Under the United States Constitution, there are only
three federal crimes: piracy, treason, and
counterfeiting. All other criminal matters are left to

the individual states. Any federal legislation dealing
with criminal matters not related to these three issues
usurps state authority over criminal law and takes a
step toward turning the states into mere
administrative units of the federal government.66

On September 7, 2000 Paul opposed the creation of the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum while at the same time
pretending to denounce Hitler:

Mr. Chairman, I rise today in hesitant opposition to
H.R. 4115, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum
Authorization Act. We as vigilant Americans must
never forget the horrific lessons of the past and those
attendant consequences of corporatism, fascism, and
tyrannical government; that is, governmental
deprivation of individual rights. A government which
operates beyond its proper limits of preserving liberty
never bodes well for individual rights to life, liberty
and property. Particularly, Adolph Hitler’s tyrannical
regime is most indicative of the necessary
consequences of a government dominated by so-
called ‘government-business’ partnerships, gun-
confiscation schemes, protectionism, abandonment
of speech and religious freedom in the name of
‘compelling government interests.’67


67. Congressional Record, V. 146, Pt. 12, July 27, 2000 to September 13,
2000 page 17229


Hitler was a socialistic gun-confiscating liberal
willing to abandon freedom of speech and religion in
the name of ‘compelling government interests”
another word for national security. The Nazis never
nationalized the German means of production and
companies like Mercedes Benz and General Aniline
thrived under Hitler. Hitler had the socialist wing of
the Nazi Party exterminated during the Night of the
Long Knives.

Paul continued to characterize Hitler as a socialist rather
than a National Socialist:

The 20th century has produced socialist dictators the
world over, from Stalin, Hitler, and Mao to Pol Pot,
Castro, and Ho Chi Minh. More than 200 million
people died as a result of bad ideas of these evil
men. Each and every one of these dictators despised
the principle of private property ownership, which
then undermined all the other liberties cherished by
the people.

Paul had this to say about the resurgence of Nazism in Europe:

This legislation refers to the rise of anti-Semitism in
Europe as if it’s a purely homegrown phenomenon,
as if native residents of European countries are
suddenly committing violent crimes against Jews. But
I think we are only getting part of the story here.
What is absent from the legislation is mention of the
well reported fact that much of the anti-Jewish
violence in Europe is perpetrated by recent
immigrants from Muslim countries of the Middle East
and Africa. Reporting on a firebombing of a
Synagogue in Marseille, France, for example, the
New York Times quotes the longtime president of


that region’s Jewish Council, Charles Haddad, as
saying, “This is not anti-Semitic violence; it’s the
Middle East conflict that’s playing out here.”

The national police state mentality has essentially
taken over crime investigation throughout the
country. Our local sheriffs are intimidated and
frequently overruled by the national police. Anything
worse than writing traffic tickets prompts swarms of
Federal agents to the scene. We frequently see the
FBI, the DEA, the CIA, the BATF, Fish and Wildlife,
the IRS, Federal marshals and even the Army
involved in local law enforcement. They do not come
to assist, but to take over. The two most notorious
examples of federal abuse of police powers were
seen at Ruby Ridge and Waco, where non-
aggressive citizens were needlessly provoked and
killed by government agents. At Waco, even Army
tanks were used to deal with a situation that the local
sheriff could have easily handled. These two
incidents are well-known, but thousands of other
similar abuses routinely occur with little publicity. The
Federal police state seen in the action the Ruby
Ridge and Waco hopefully is not a sign of things to
come, but it could be, if we are not careful.

In a speech reprinted in the Spotlight
Paul remarked: “This fear has come from
the police state mentality that prompted
Ruby Ridge, Waco and many other
episodes of an errant federal government.”
In 1992, in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, white
separatist Randy Weaver, with his wife, four
children, and a family friend, resisted well
over one hundred law enforcement authorities after federal
marshals attempted to arrest him for failing to make a court date

stemming from illegal gun sales. Protestors for the Weavers
included Aryan Nation members, skinheads, and Order members'
families. Spotlight ran numerous articles about the incident. After an
eleven-day standoff a federal marshal, Weaver's wife Vicki and his
son Sam were dead and a federal marshal, Weaver, and Weaver's
friend shot. Rep. Helen Chenoweth (R-Idaho) introduced legislation
in the House requiring federal authorities to secure state and local
permission to conduct law enforcement operations in municipalities.
Paul co-sponsored the bill.

Every American racist is behind Ron Paul. He is their
candidate! They know where he is coming from and there are plenty
of them as historically there was never a shortage of bigots in


A smaller group of Paul supporters consist of Muslims. There
several Facebook pages entitled Muslims for Ron Paul. A scan of
Paul's political donors shows many common Muslim names, like
Mohammed, Ali and Ahmed.68 Yousef al-Khattab, co-founder of
the Islamist69 website and group Revolution Muslim,70 endorsed Ron
Paul.71 The Website muslims4liberty, a pro-Paul site, contained this:

It looks like the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)
needs a serious reality check. Last week the SPLC


added long time friend of Muslims 4 Liberty, Michael
Boldin to their list of “30 New Activists Heading Up
the Radical Right.”72 Michael is the Founder and
Director of the Tenth Amendment Center73 (TAC)
and Muslims 4 Liberty stands with him TAC against
this despicable slander.

The TAC believes citizens and states have the right to nullify
federal law so it has gained wide support among neo-Confederates
who are still angry at the powers the federal government
accumulated after the Civil War that allowed it, among other things,
to act against segregation, discrimination. In the 1950s, several
states tried unsuccessfully to resist desegregation by nullifying
federal laws. The Supreme Court has consistently rejected
nullification as unconstitutional.74

LOUIS FARRAKHAN of the Nation of Islam also supports Ron

Brother Farrakhan is not anti-Semitic. But I have to
say these people [those who established the Federal
Reserve Bank in 1913] claim to be Jews. And no the
Federal Reserve Bank really don’t have nobody
overseeing them. Congressman Ron Paul is trying
his best but he is like a man crying in the wilderness
to try and scrape the Federal Reserve and bring the
right to print money back to the U.S. Congress.75


Farrakhan went on the say that it was no coincidence that the
Anti-Defamation League was formed in 1913 as its purpose was to
stop anyone from criticizing the Federal Reserve Bank. Out of six
bankers present at the formulation of the Fed, one, Paul Warburg of
Kuhn & Loeb was Jewish.76

Another large group of rank and file Ron Paul supporters are young
Whites. In the results of a Gallup77 poll broken down by age of
respondents, Ron Paul does disproportionately well with voters
aged 18-34, being the preferred choice of 20% of that demographic
nationally. Some of these kids have no idea what Paul represents
and have no idea of his hidden agenda. They are dupes. They are
generally the young Paulbots who don’t realize Paul is a Nazi and
instead believe he is a Libertarian who wants to free the Prisoners
of Weed (POW) and legalize marijuana. Paul plays them like a
violin. I assume they believe he is as far from Nazi totalitarianism as
you can get because he attacks the power of the State, however, he
does this for several covert reasons. The main reason is that it is
part of his crypto-Nazi politics. Paul is a neo-confederate and if this
were American Civil War times he would be labeled a traitor to the



Paul says that he wants to weaken the Federal Government and
wants certain powers returned to State Governments just as the
Confederates did. This way the Southern states could re-institute
the right to segregate and discriminate. “States’ Rights” as in J. B.
Stoner’s National States Rights Party is a dog whistle term for the
imposition of Jim Crow. These younger Paulbots are programmed
with the same buzz words such as “constitution” and “freedom” as
they troll the internet looking for negative comments about Paul.
Freedom and Bread," was the slogan used by Hitler to great effect
during the Nazi electoral campaign against tired old President


But not all of Paul’s youthful followers are Nazi dupes. Judging
from World War II and how America refused to bomb the Nazi death
camps, there will always be a residual undercurrent of Jew hatred in
America for demagogues like Paul to tap into for support. That is
why, although they have had no Nazi affiliation in the past, many
Ron Paul supporters have held racist and Jew-hating sympathies
that they were forced to suppress otherwise they would have risked
social ostracism in a politically correct world. This group caught on
to the fact that Ron Paul is a crypto-Nazi and jumped at the chance


to finally express their hatred for Blacks and Jews in a socially
acceptable way and politically correct way.


Jew-hating “Progressives” are also supporting Ron Paul. At
Truthdig, Robert Scheer calls him “a profound and principled
contributor to a much-needed national debate on the limits of
federal power.” When former White House correspondent Helen
Thomas said that Jews should leave Palestine and go back to
Poland and Germany Scheer defended her. Salon’s Glenn
Greenwald (photo left) is so outraged that
progressives haven’t abandoned Obama for
Paul that he accuses them of supporting the
murder of Muslim children. Greenwald had to
stop practicing law after it was revealed that he
had smuggled out messages from prison on
behalf of Nazi Matt Hale. There’s a Paul fan
base in the Occupy movement and
at Counterpunch, where Alexander Cockburn is a longtime admirer.
Cockburn was fired from the Village Voice for taking money from
anti-Israeli Arab organizations. Paul is a regular guest of Jonathan
Stuart Leibowitz (Jon Stewart), who has yet to ask him a tough
question. Stewart minimizes the threat posed by radical Islam and
has often been labeled a traitor to the Jews. The leftist Code Pink
endorsed him. Jewish celebrities like Oliver Stone, Howard Stern
and Bill Maher also support Paul for reasons that are beyond my
understanding, although Oliver Stone showed that despite the
indisputable fact that Adolf Hitler would have sent him to a gas
chamber Stone had sympathy for him: “Hitler is an easy scapegoat
throughout history and it’s been used cheaply.”

Stone, who met with the Iranian Hitler Ahmadinejad, went on to
say that the Jewish Lobby is preventing an open discussion about
the truth of the Holocaust. Stone’s son recently traveled to Iran and
converted to Shiite Islam. In the early 1980’s Stone was going to

base his move JFK on a book I co-authored Coup D’Etat in America
– The CIA and the Assassination of John Kennedy however Colonel
Fletcher Prouty talked him out of it. Prouty was on the Board of
Directors of Spotlight. The Jew haters on the Left know that Paul is
a dedicated, incorruptible enemy of the State of Israel as any Nazi
would be. That is why they rally behind him.


Jews on the far Right also support Paul. In his book, Liberty
Defined Paul expressed his pleasure that an anti-Zionist self-hating
group called the American Council for Judaism allegedly has
growing support.

Other American Jews have spoken out against
Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians as well. The
American Council for Judaism is growing in influence
in the American Jewish community, especially with
the younger generation. Although it’s argued that
Jews are motivated to immigrate to Israel because
they were exiled from Palestine, only a small fraction
of American Jews ever moved to Israel.

The American Council for Judaism is opposed the concept of
Jewish nationality and a Jewish state. The editor of its publications,
Allan C. Brownfield, told the New York Times that “While we wish
Israel well, we don’t view it as our homeland.” In the fall of 2010,
Brownfield wrote a glowing book review of The Dark Side of
Zionism, a book that equates Zionism with Nazism.78 Brownfield’s
article Zionism and Anti-Semitism - A Strange Alliance Through
History was reprinted by the Nazi Institute for Historical Review.79




Allan C. Brownfeld received his B.A.
degree from the College of William and
Mary, his J.D. degree from the Marshall-
Wythe School of Law of the College of
William and Mary and his M.A. in
Government and Politics from the
University of Maryland. He has served on
the faculties of St. Stephen's Episcopal
School, Alexandria, Virginia, and the University College of the
University of Maryland. He is not much of a Jew; in fact it appears
as if he has converted to Catholicism somewhere along the line.

Brownfeld is a columnist for the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation,80
a bunch of Jew hating anti-abortion Catholics that include the
Holocaust denier and Spotlight golden boy Patrick Buchanan. The
Foundation recently honored Joe Sobran, a Jew hating piece of
trash who was fired by William F. Buckley from the National Review
for his anti-Semitic columns. In 1985 a six-member federal jury
found that Spotlight libeled National Review in the early 1970's by
printing that National Review's editor, William F. Buckley Jr., had a
''close working relationship'' with George Lincoln Rockwell, founder
of the American Nazi Party. This was a clever ploy and a big lie
used to discredit Buckley. The Nazi’s considered Buckley a kosher
conservative and a threat to the racist right.

The founder of the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation, Fran Griffin,
and a big pro-lifer, supports Ron Paul despite Paul’s having said
that abortion laws should be left up to the States, rather than
abortion being outlawed on a federal level as murder. If this were to
be the case women in states where it was illegal could always travel
to states where it was not to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.



The American Council for Judaism was
founded by Lessing J. Rosenwald. Rosenwald
was a pathological piece of work who wanted to
see his own people destroyed, thinking the Nazis
would overlook him or maybe he believed that the
Nazis were right and he also should be
destroyed? Born in Chicago, Rosenwald was the
son of Julius Rosenwald, a clothier who became
part-owner and was president of Sears, Roebuck and
Company from 1908 to 1923, and chairman from 1923 to 1932.
Lessing went to work for Sears in 1911 as a shipping clerk, and in
1920, was given the important responsibility of opening a catalog
supply center for the growing mail-order. Succeeding his father, he
was Chairman of Sears from 1932 until 1939. Rosenwald was the
best known Jewish supporter of the America First Committee that
was led by his successor at Sears-Roebuck and lifelong
friend Robert E. Wood. He finally resigned from the Committee's
board in December 1940 over concerns about anti-Semitism, but
stated that he remained "fully in accord with the Committee's
objectives." In 1943, Rosenwald accepted the invitation to become
President of the American Council for Judaism, a position he held
until 1955; after that he remained Chairman of the Board.81

Dr. Alfred M. Lilienthal was another
prominent member of the American Council
for Judaism. Lilienthal was the first Jew to
denounce Israel in Readers Digest article
entitled “Israel’s Flag is Not Mine.” The Nazi
Duke praised Lilienthal for having dared to
expose the truth about Jewish supremacism.
Lilienthal signed a petition that supported
French Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson's right to publish his filthy
lies in France. Lilienthal was published by Regnery Press. Henry



Regnery's grandfather, William H. Regnery, was the founder of the
America First Committee. Lilienthal, the dirty low life piece of scum
wrote this about, Anne Frank, an innocent Jewish girl killed by the
Nazi pigs:

The Diary of Anne Frank may be a fraud. It was sold
as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl who died in
a Nazi concentration camp after two years of abuse
and horror. Any informed literary inspection of this
book would have shown it could not possibly have
been the work of a teenager.82

Paul favors self-hating Jews because
they are easier to deceive and to
ultimately murder than the militant
variety. Ron Paul shook a hand that
shook Achmadinajad’s hand. The
hand belonged to Yisroel Dovid
Weiss, a traitorous “rabbi” who leads
Neturei Karta, a sect of ultra-Orthodox Jews who want to see Israel
destroyed to hasten the coming of the Messiah. While many
Haredim (ultra-orthodox) believe the Jews get the Holy Land when
the Messiah arrives, not before -- only Neturei Karta actively sides
with Israel's enemies. The late Neturei Karta leader Moshe
Hirsh was a close associate of Yasser Arafat, and Rabbi Weiss has
traveled with a delegation to Tehran more than once, including on a
trip to attend an infamous conference on so-called Holocaust
revisionism. Weiss told Paul that Judaism was a religion and
"should never be transformed into nationalism." Paul responded by
saying that the suggestion was "good advice".



Ron Paul’s Jewish senior legal advisor, Bruce Fein, believes
that Paul won’t wait until America is attacked but would take pre-
emptive action if the CIA called for it:

Ron Paul would close the hundreds of U.S. military
bases abroad, redeploy weapons and soldiers now
dedicated to defending foreigners and foreign
countries to the U.S. to defend American sovereignty
and Americans, and end our multiple treaty
obligations that require us to wage war in defense of
other nations. Our government shouldn’t send
Americans abroad on quests to secure the liberty of

Candidate Paul favors the collection of intelligence
on potential adversaries, trade between the United
States and other nations, and cultural exchanges and
embassies abroad. Like President Thomas Jefferson,
he would seek “peace, commerce, and honest
friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with

The cornerstone of peace and the common defense
is deterrence. Ron Paul would embrace a retaliatory
capability sufficient to destroy every living thing in
any country complicit in an actual or imminent attack
on the United States. He would deploy troops and
weapons systems capable of foiling any acts of war
targeting Americans on American soil.83

Ron Paul, however, said he would never launch a pre-emptive



Why are we in Korea? We’ve been there since I’ve
been in high school. Why are we in Japan? We’ve
been there since World War II. Why are we in
Germany, subsidizing their welfare state by paying
for their defense by staying in Germany? And why
are we in five wars in the Middle East? We’d be
much better off. We are less safe because of this.
We’re going broke. And it undermines our national
security. So why stay any of those places? There’s
no economic or military advantage for us to be so
involved, trying to make other people live the way we
do. If we have—

Fox News: Well, yeah, but some would say,
Congressman, that there’s a difference in being
defensive or being offensive, when it comes to
protecting our country. Some believe that we can
more defensive, and when there’s a threat we can
defend against it. Others believe that we should be
offensive, which is part of the reason why there are
some military bases overseas, so that we’re “leading”
in those areas.

Ron Paul: Right!

Fox News: Why do you believe that that’s not the
way to go?

Ron Paul: Because that’s the way dictators work. To
say it casually that we should consider being
offensive, that’s what dictators do. This whole idea
that was encapsulated with the last administration
that “we endorse preventive war, pre-emptive war;
we go to war to prevent somebody from attacking
us,” that is endless war—and for casual reasons,
without declaration. I think that is so dangerous. We


should have a defense; we should defend our
country. But when you talk about bases because we
might need an offensive war, I consider that
absolutely un-American.84

Fein was raised in an Orthodox Jewish home and
in 1972 graduated from Harvard Law School with
honors. Fein served as an associate deputy
attorney and general counsel to the Federal
Communications Commission under Ronald
Reagan. He served as Research Director for
Republicans on the Joint Congressional
Committee on Covert Arms Sales to Iran. He has been a Visiting
Fellow for Constitutional Studies at the Heritage Foundation and an
adjunct scholar at American Enterprise Institute. He has advised
numerous countries on constitutional reform, including South Africa,
Hungary and Russia. Sounds like a rational individual until we
discover that he drew up baseless articles of impeachment for
President Obama. But now the plot thickens.

Fein’s wife, Mattie, an Iranian Jew, took an interventionist pro-
Israel position when she ran for Congress in Venice, California.
Mattie Fein was asked “Would you support Israel taking military
action to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons? Under what
circumstances?” and she responded “The United States should
support whatever Israel believes is justified by national security
worries over Iran.” As a result many of the Jew-hating Paulbots are
calling for the removal of Fein as they have labeled this Jewish
Uncle Tom, this token Jew, this schick dreck, as a Zionist infiltrator.



Ron Paul stated he would not have helped Jews escape the
Holocaust. Fein wrote:

That Kissinger is devoid of moral scruple or noble
character is confirmed by a recently released Oval
Office tape recording his volunteered advice to then
President Richard M. Nixon regarding the free
emigration of Soviet Jews to Israel to escape
persecution: "And if they put Jews into gas chambers
in the Soviet Union, it is not an American
concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern."85

Ron Paul is against criminalizing hate speech but Fein is not:

The ugliest marks in the history of the United States
have stemmed from the incitements to racial
prejudice practiced by Theodore Bilbo, Orville
Faubus, the Ku Klux Klan, and the producers of The
Birth of a Nation. Diatribes of these types create an
explosive social nitroglycerine waiting for an epithet
or racial incident to spark violence. ...It is said that if
racially or religiously bigoted speech is squelched,
there will be no stopping point to prevention of
genuine free speech. Nonsense! The progress of
civilization has been the progress of making
refinements and differentiations in the law.
Prohibitions on racially or religiously derogatory
speech have existed in the United States, Canada,
Great Britain, West Germany, and elsewhere without
undermining democracy, political dissent or debate.
...Prohibiting racially and religiously bigoted speech is
praiseworthy because it seeks to elevate, not to



degrade, because it draws from human experience,
not from woolly dogmas or academic slogans,
because it salutes reason as the backbone of
freedom and tolerance. Is that clear enough?86

When Fein parrots Paul’s line about cutting off foreign aid he
never mentions the word “Israel” but lists other countries like the
Sudan. He is afraid his family might disown him. There are so many
contradictions about Fein that I have to question whether is a
publicity seeker who would sell out his own people to get on cable
or something more sinister. Anyway you want to look at it he is
serving the Nazis.


Numerous Ron Paul web pages carry stories that alleged that
Ron Paul is the victim of massive vote fraud. Researcher Dennis
King reported that when crypto-Nazi Lyndon LaRouche candidates
made a poor showing,

The national office strives to maintain their morale by
telling them it's a result of "vote fraud." The USLP



(LaRouches political party) has become, in fact, quite
expert on the vote fraud issue. In 1976 it persuaded
local Republicans in four states, and also a top Ford
advisor, to cooperate in court challenges against
Carter's victory. According to defectors, the USLP
vote fraud experts have also been hired on occasion
as consultants to mainstream politicians.87

This claim of vote fraud is not the only connection between Ron
Paul and Lyndon LaRouche and his zombie-like followers. In the
mid-1970s LaRouche and his group were close with Ron Paul
associate Willis Carto, according to LaRouche's deposition in a libel
case and one by Carto in another lawsuit. Carto said in his 1980
deposition that his group, Liberty Lobby, never endorsed the
LaRouche’s group but that he was "quite impressed" with its
members and that his organization's newspaper, Spotlight, had
praised it. LaRouche met with Carto in Wiesbaden, Germany.
Questioned about this meeting during a 1984 deposition, LaRouche
recalled that they had discussed "the Jewish question" as well as
the "abomination" of America's postwar occupation of Germany.
LaRouche knows Paul is a crypto-Nazi like him and sings his

Going into the final Republican Presidential debate of
the pre-primary series, Rep. Ron Paul's support is
surging, based on the response to his principled
stands against Obama's wars, and against Obama's
violent attacks on U.S. constitutional principles and
civil rights. Paul has reportedly worked with attorney
Bruce Fein, who has circulated a bill of impeachment
against Obama. Lyndon LaRouche commented that
should Paul win in Iowa and/or New Hampshire, it will



"trigger a crisis" for the British-directed perpetual war

According to Dennis King “British” is LaRouche’s dog whistle term
for Jew. LaRouche stated:

In addition to Ron Paul's statement's that an
"impeachment process would be possible" against
Obama in the killing of American citizens Anwar al-
Awlaki and Samir Kahn, are condemnations from
other leading figures. Already on Sept. 30,
Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) made a
statement condemning the administration for what it
called "the extrajudicial killing" of Anwar al-Awlaki, an
American citizen. In the larger context, the fact that
Obama has boasted that he is responsible for the
assassinations of two American citizens, with no due
process and a "state secret" blanket claim, is the
strongest corroboration to date of Lyndon
LaRouche's April 11, 2009 diagnosis of Obama as an
extreme narcissist in the tradition of Emperor Nero
and Hitler in the bunker. On Friday, Obama proved
that LaRouche was absolutely correct. As of Friday,
Obama is a lot closer to being removed from office by
impeachment or the invoking of Section 4 of the 25th
Amendment than most people realize.89

LaRouche agrees with Ron Paul when it comes to the Fed:
“The Fed prefers to please the British, rather than defend the
interests of the United States. These people have betrayed the
country," LaRouche concluded. "They should get the credit for
betraying the country." He agrees with Paul on 9/11 revisionism and




with Willis Carto on Holocaust denial: In a Carto-influenced article
LaRouche later tried to suppress, LaRouche stated:

America must be cleansed for its righteous war by
the immediate elimination of the Nazi Jewish Lobby
and other British agents from the councils of
government, industry, and labor. Zionist cultism is
among the most worthless, most contemptible of

What LaRouche is saying here is that America must make
amends for its role in World War II by purging the various
professions of Jews, just as Hitler did in Nazi Germany.

We shall now examine the cult character of Zionism
at successive levels, beginning with the
commonplace delusions of the American Zionist or
Zionist fellow traveler. The contemptible but
impassioned sophistry that the Zionist demagogue
offers to all foolish enough to be impressed with such
hoaxes is the ‘holocaust’ thesis. It is argued that the
culmination of the persecution of the Jews in the Nazi
holocaust proves that Zionism is so essential to
‘Jewish survival’ that any anti-Zionist is therefore not
only an anti-Semite, but that any sort of criminal
action is excusable against anti-Zionists in memory of
the mythical ‘six million Jewish victims’ of the Nazi
‘holocaust.’ This is worse than sophistry. It is a lie.

True about a million and a half Jews did die as a
result of the Nazi policy of labor-intensive
‘appropriate technology’ for the employment of
‘inferior races,’ a small fraction of the tens of millions



of others - especially Slavs - who were murdered in
the same way Jewish refugee Felix Rohatyn
proposes today.

So there weren’t any gas chambers – Jews were worked to
death at menial jobs and was only a small fraction of the others who
were murdered. Then LaRouche brings in Felix Rohatyn to illustrate
that today the Jews are worse murderers than the Nazis were.

Even on a relative scale, what the Nazis did to
Jewish victims was mild compared with the virtual
extermination of gypsies and the butchery of
Communists. The point is that Adolf Hitler was put
into power largely on the initiative of the Rothschilds,
Warburgs and Oppenheimers, among others.

According to LaRouche the Jews brought on their own destruction
by financing Hitler.

The murderers of the million and a half or more Jews
who died in the ‘holocaust’ are any group, Jewish or
non-Jewish, which supported then or now the policies
advocated by Felix Rohatyn or Milton Friedman.
Either you, as a Jew, join with the U.S. Labor Party to
stop Rohatyn and Friedman or you are implicitly just
as guilty of the death of millions of Jews as Adolf

Here LaRouche says “a million and a half or more” Jews were
killed in the so-called Holocaust rather than “a million and a half”
and again attributes their death to the Jewish economists Rohatyn
and Friedman then he tells us you have to join him in his effort to
“stop” (kill) these Jews or you will be labeled “a Nazi” (confusing
code word for a Jew) and you will die like the rest of the Jews when
the big day comes and LaRouche takes power. All these code
words and bizarre theories caused LaRouche to be less of a threat
than Paul, although long as he is alive LaRouche will remain a

threat. In 1976, LaRouche campaigned for the first time in a
presidential election as a U.S. Labor Party candidate, polling 40,043
votes (0.05 percent). He received 25,562 votes in the 1988
presidential election, standing under the banner of the "National
Economic Recovery" party. In the 1988 Presidential Election Paul
placed third in the popular vote with 431,750 votes (0.47%), behind
Republican Bush and Democrat Michael Dukakis.


In July 2012 Ron Paul spoke at a rally on Sunday, August 26,
2012 at the University of South Florida’s Sundome. This event was
going to be the biggest Nazi rally since the German-American Bund
at Madison Square Garden in New York City, on February 20, 1939
pictured on the left, however on twenty-thousand people attended.

The speakers included Doug Weade, Paul’s campaign
manager (the closest Paul will ever come to weed) and Ron Paul’s
former chief of staff Lew Rockwell. Rockwell reprinted hundreds of
Patrick Buchanan’s articles on his blog. Rockwell is the
reincarnation of neo-Nazi leader George Lincoln Rockwell. He

What happened was that when the Nazis first learned
of the fire, they assumed that it was carried out by
the Communists and, therefore, that it would be a
great piece of political propaganda to use to go after
the Communists. When they later learned that it was


a lone arsonist, they decided to ignore the truth and
still claim the Communists were behind the fire.
And that is the lie about the Reichstag Fire—not that
it was a False Flag operation carried out by the

Rockwell has a history of defending Nazis and wrote, “When
Nazi Germany occupied France during WW2, did the evil Germans
forbid the French from going to church?”92 In a 1990 column
defending Nazi War Criminal John Demjanjuk Buchanan denied that
Jews had been mass murdered using diesel engine fumes:

Diesel engines do not emit enough carbon monoxide
to kill anybody. In 1988, 97 kids trapped 400 feet
underground in Washington, D.C. tunnel while two
locomotive spewed diesel exhausts into the car,
emerged unharmed after 45 minutes. Demjanjuk’s
weapon of mass murder cannot kill.

The Paulfest featured at least one Jew so it
would not seem like an anti-Jewish, anti-Israel
event. Professor Walter Edward Block (see
illustration for his book Thinking the
Unthinkable on the left) spoke. Block lectured
about the rights of a woman to stop an
unwanted pregnancy. He explained that the
libertarian theory of abortion leads to the right
of the woman to evict an unwanted fetus, but not to kill that fetus, a
theory he refers to as "evictionism." Block stated that in the event of
an unwanted pregnancy, a fetus becomes to its mother what a
trespasser is to the owner of the property in question. The problem
here is that the “trespasser” is afforded no rights, no liberty, from




this so-called libertarian. If the pregnancy is terminated in the six
month of gestation he would remove it and let it die a horrible death
rather than perform a Dilation and Curettage.

This crackpot is one of the leading Jewish
defenders of voluntary slave contracts93 arguing that a
slave contract is "a bona fide contract where
consideration crosses hands; when it is abrogated,
theft occurs." He argues that his position shows "that
contract, predicated on private property [can] reach to the furthest
realms of human interaction, even to voluntary slave contracts.” 94
Aside from the re-legalization of slavery, the Pauloids will be rallying
for more strip mining as Block has written,

To say of a thing that it is “natural” or “unnatural” is not to say
anything about that thing’s intrinsic value. A thing’s value depends
upon whether or not it satisfies our needs, and contributes to our
well-being. Strip mining, when evaluated rationally, fulfills these
more rational criteria. Block made some stupid Jewish joke that
stereotyped Jews.

Of course the main speaker was Ron Paul. The former Liberty
Lobbyist repeatedly used the word “Liberty” in an ambiguous
fashion as in “the cause of liberty.” What he precisely meant by the
word was never defined but his audience comprised of 99% Whites
knew what he meant, Paul was unhappy with the RNC because
many of his delegates had been disqualified because of a rule
change and because he was not going to be given a speaking slot
at the convention. He never mentioned Israel by name however it
was referred to by implication when he used the term “my foreign
policy.” He recalled that other “mainstream republicans” had told




We like you but if you would change your foreign
policy you would have a lot more success. You need
to change your foreign policy. And of course if I didn’t
have the policy that I do have I don’t believe we
would be here tonight. This is something they
obviously do not understand; those who do
understand it fear it because of the powerful special
interests behind a foreign policy of intervention in the
military industrial complex but its complex but they
strongly resent this.

The term “military industrial complex” was invented by the
Leftist sociologist C. Wright Mills and first used in his book The
Power Elite (1956) then picked up by President Eisenhower in his
farewell address (1960) in which he stated that it was a threat to
democracy. So the dirty Jews are the “powerful special interests”
who pull the strings behind the scenes and control the armaments
industry so they can profiteer from the wars they instigate. Later on
Paul would state, “The media is part of the military industrial
complex.” In other words the Jews control the media. Another code
word for Jew is “neo-con” because many of the neo-cons were
Jewish. “Right now we still have neo-cons all over the place they are
not just in one party either.”

Paul traced America’s troubles to 1913 but refused to admit that
a Republican was President at the time. Paul continues his historical
narrative but is hesitant to use the word “Nazi.” He skipped over a
few decades then stated that it was in the “1930’s where we had so
much Fascism and Keynesianism.” Earlier he had said that in the
1930’s “the fascism of Hitler and Mussolini, and they contributed to
another 25 million people that died” then made reference to the
“fascism of Europe” and how we “ended up” in World War II. Paul is
not going to blame the Nazis because he is a crypto-Nazi.

Paul knows by this time he will get nowhere with the American
people unless there is a catastrophic economic event that can be

blamed on Israel: “The downfall of the economy will provide more
excuses to crack the whip and crackdown on our civil liberties.” He
makes it seem as if the present administration would be responsible
when it would more likely be crypto-Nazis like himself.

Terrorism is a result of “blowback” and the chances of anyone
being killed by a terrorist are one in 25 million. He claimed that
American soldier had up to a 20% chance that he would be killed by
friendly fire. Paul said he heard someone remark that if Paul’s
people were in charge Osama Bin Laden would still be alive. Paul
countered “but you know that I think the answer is so would the
3,000 people still be alive.” So America was to blame for 9/11 not
Islam. Prior to this Paul hinted 9/11 was an inside job. Paul said he
had also be accused of not being patriotic – he cited pre-op traitor
not only to his country but to his sex, Bradley Manning and Wiki
U.S. security document publisher Julian Assange as patriots. Ron
Paul ended his farewell address with this thought:

In 1935 Sinclair Lewis wrote a novel It Can’t Happen
Here and that novel essentially was a warning
because he believed that it could happen here; it was
an anti-Fascist novel because he was very
concerned about Mussolini and the Nazis and his
whole argument was that it can happen here. But I
would like to turn that around and say it can
happen here.

Paul qualified this statement saying something for the good can
happen here but his more cognizant followers caught on to the real
drift of his statement.

Currently Ron Paul supporters are a minority. But remember,
Hitler’s "National-Socialist Freedom Movement" polled 3% of the
vote in the December 1924 Reichstag elections, and this fell to 2.6%
in 1928. State elections produced similar results. But two years
later, after the results were in for the September 1930 Reichstag


elections, the Nazis won 18.3% of the vote, and became the
second-largest party in the Reichstag. This was a result of the 1929
stock market crash and the subsequent Great Depression during
which Germany became the hardest hit country with unemployment
reaching 6.5 million. As long as Ron Paul runs for public office he is
a threat. Hitler was elected to public office; there was no coup or
power grab and Ron Paul is still a viable candidate waiting in the
wings to take power when the economic and political circumstances
are right. Paul's campaign chairman Jesse Benton stated that Paul
was not considering running under a third-party candidacy barring
"some sort of financially catastrophic event in this country." Paul
was hoping that an American-Israeli attack on Iran launched before
the 2012 elections will cause an economic crisis that will catapult
him to power just as Hitler benefited from the 1929 Stock Market
crash and the Great Depression that followed.95 Paul is betting
against America. Ron Paul is a defeatist and traitor to his country
who wants to accomplish what Hitler failed to do – defeat the United

For every generation of Jews there is going to be some political
figure out to mass murder the Jewish people and this time it is Ron
Paul, in league with his proxy, Ahmadinejad, the Hitler of Iran.





Paul knows that it would be impossible to goad America into
attacking the Jewish state. He needs a proxy and he sees Iran as
his best hope because the leader of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,
is a Holocaust denier and Holocaust deniers are Nazis like himself.
As reported, Holocaust denial (Holocaust Revisionism is a
euphemism) was an invention of Francis Parker Yockey, a Nazi spy.
Yockey was linked to Ron Paul through Paul’s associate Spotlight
publisher Willis Carto.

Where are Holocaust deniers really
coming from? Holocaust deniers are
crypto-Nazis not revisionist historians.
First of all they all know the Holocaust
took place but deny it in order to further
Nazism. Most people were disgusted by
Nazism due to its insane genocidal


nature so the Nazis want to convince people that this pathology did
not exist so people will be attracted to Nazism once again. They are
well aware that unlike themselves, not too many people are into
gassing babies. Holocaust deniers also want to deny the last
Holocaust so when they perpetrate a new one they can deny that
one too. Another motivation of the Nazi Holocaust denier is to de-
legitimatize the necessity for the existence of Israel, because the
Holocaust was what convinced the world to give the Jews their own
State. The Nazi despises Israel because the existence of Israel
makes it much harder for the Nazi insect to kill Jews since, unlike
the Jews in Nazi Germany Jews in Israel are not unarmed. Nazism
is about - among other things - the killing of Jews; it is a criminal
conspiracy to commit mass murder. Finally these vermin want to
desecrate the memory of those who perished. They’ve taken
everything from these Jews and now they want to take their deaths
from them and make them into non-persons.

The first part of Paul’s plan to destroy Israel then wipe out the
Jewish race is to protect the political interests of Ahmadinejad, the
Hitler of Iran, by ending sanctions against Iran (Paul was one of four
Congressmen who voted against sanctions) so that the regime does
not capitulate and give up its bomb making program. Paul wants to
help the Iranians get atomic weapons and the means to deliver
them to Tel Aviv any way he can.


Rep. Justin Amash was one of the four. Justin Amash is the son
of a Palestinian father, and Syrian mother. The father of this first-
generation Arab-American is a Palestinian whose family was driven
from its home by Israel during its war of liberation and lived in a
refugee camp. Amash is chairman of the House Liberty Caucus.
There’s no formal membership list, and Amash said about a dozen
regular meetings are held in his office. He hopes the group gets big
enough someday that they need to move to a bigger space.


In his Position Paper on U.S. – Israel Relations he stated “The
United States has a long and strategically important history of strong
foreign relations with Israel. As a member of Congress, I will work to
continue and strengthen this relationship. I will also respect Israel’s
sovereignty and will not support counterproductive efforts to impose
agreements or conditions on Israel. Israel must manage its foreign
relations and domestic policies as it deems to be in its own best
interests as a sovereign nation.” This has caused some other Arabs
to label him pro-Israel; however, his affinity for Ron Paul indicates
this is merely a ruse. Note the phrase “strategically important history
of strong foreign relations” as to military relations. Then he goes on
to state that America must minimize its foreign relations with Israel
and let the Jewish State be on its own. Rand Paul also claims to be
pro-Israel yet he is in favor of letting Iran develop the bomb.

“Ron Paul was an educational figure. He was out there really
presenting things that others had not been talking about,” Amash
said. “This next generation of liberty Republicans, like Rand Paul
and Mike Lee and Thomas Massie and Raul Labrador, we’re
interested in making sure that … we re-brand the Republican Party
as a place that is welcoming to people from across the political
spectrum and follows the founding principles of our country: limited
government, economic freedom, individual liberty.” Amash voted
against H.R. 3783 Countering Iran in the Western Hemisphere Act
of 2012 along with John Duncan, (R-TN), Walter Jones (R-NC)
Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Ron Paul
(Nazi -TX).


The Palestinian Arab “Christian” introduced H.R. 2399, the
Limiting Internet and Blanket Electronic Review of
Telecommunications and Email Act that restricts the federal
government’s ability under the Patriot Act to collect information on
Americans who are not connected to an ongoing investigation. The
bill also requires that secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
(FISA) court opinions be made available to Congress and
summaries of the opinions be made available to the public. It would
cripple America’s ability to fight terrorism, but Amash is on the other
side and wants to see another terrorist attack that can be blamed on
America’s relationship with Israel or on Israel.


Amash is leading C4L which “was instrumental in 2010 in
defeating the free speech-infringing “Disclose” Act that was directly
targeted at our donors’ privacy. They also joined with my son Rand
in 2011 to nearly derail renewal of key “Patriot” Act provisions.
Campaign for Liberty activists in Delaware led an effort to defeat HB
88. HB 88 would have given new powers to state bureaucrats to
deny Delaware citizens their Second Amendment rights by declaring
them “mentally ill.”

The second part of Paul’s plan involves weakening Israel by
cutting off all economic and military aid so that it will be easier for
Iran to destroy it. But he can’t say this; otherwise people would put
this together with his Nazi Newsletter connections and realize what
his hidden agenda is about. So he says cut off all foreign aid. All
foreign aid should end, which is blatantly unconstitutional. Paul had
to admit “While it may be a relatively small part of our federal
budget, for many countries it is a large part of theirs and it creates
perverse incentives for both our friends and enemies.”

In February 2012 Paul asked for House vote on an amendment
that would cut $6 billion of U.S. aid. Paul was trying to build support
for an amendment to the fiscal 2011 funding bill that would end all


foreign assistance to Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Pakistan. If Paul's
amendment gets a vote, it would be the first time the entire House
would vote on whether or not to give $6 billion to these foreign
governments. The vote would come in the midst of the largest
American fiscal crisis in a generation, which could increase the
chance that it would attract significant support.96

Paul knows well that Israel is the number one recipient of
military foreign aid. Egypt and Pakistan are next but unlike Israel
they are not threatened with annihilation from numerous hostile
nations. He fooled the New York Times which wrote, “His votes
against support for Israel follow quite naturally from his opposition to
all foreign aid. There is no sign that they reflect any special animus
against the Jewish state.”97

The third part of the plan involves bringing all the military back
from abroad, not just from the Middle East. This would also make it
more difficult to come to the aid of Israel (which would be highly
unlikely under a Paul regime anyway) and more importantly it would
remove a deterrent to war. But it has plausible deniability due to the
word all. His blanket statements shield his real purposes.

The Paulbots are fond of quoting Benjamin Netanyahu out of
context to show that Paul is a friend of Israel and is doing Israel a
favor by cutting off aid:

My friends, you don't need to do nation building in
Israel. We're already built. You don't need to export
democracy to Israel. We've already got it. You don't
need to send American troops to defend Israel. We



defend ourselves. You've been very generous in
giving us tools to do the job of defending Israel on
our own.

The rest of this quotation reads:

Thank you all, and thank you President Obama, for
your steadfast commitment to Israel's security. I
know economic times are tough. I deeply appreciate
this. Support for Israel's security is a wise investment
in our common future. 98

In no way was Netanyahu saying that Israel no longer wants
American economic and military aid. If this were the case Israel
would refuse it.

Ron Paul is Israel’s avowed enemy but he has to be low key
about it so his soft line on Israel is basically “let’s take Jefferson’s
advice and not get involved in foreign entanglements.” He wants
America to stay neutral. This is reminiscent of The Neutrality Acts,
laws that were passed by the United States Congress in the 1930s,
in response to the growing turmoil in Europe and Asia that
eventually led to World War II. They were spurred by the growth in
isolationism and non-interventionism in the US following its costly
involvement in World War I, and sought to ensure that the US would
not become entangled again in foreign conflicts. The legacy of the
Neutrality Acts in the 1930s was widely regarded as having been
generally negative: they made no distinction between aggressor and
victim, treating both equally as "belligerents"; and they limited the
US government's ability to aid Britain against Nazi Germany.

Ron Paul is also fond of saying that Israel can defend itself
because it has 300 nukes. The Nazi Paul hopes to see the State of


Israel reach a point where it would become so desperate thanks to a
nuclear Iran it have to employ these atomic weapons and exercise
what is known as the Samson Option. The Samson Option is a term
that used to describe the Israeli deterrence strategy of massive
retaliation with nuclear weapons as a “last resort” against nations
whose military attacks threaten its very existence.

The use of nuclear weapons by Israel almost became a reality
when, on the afternoon of October 6, 1973, Egypt and Syria
attacked Israel in a coordinated surprise attack, beginning the Yom
Kippur War. Caught with only regular forces on duty, augmented by
reservists with a low readiness level, Israeli front lines crumbled. By
early afternoon on October 7, no effective forces were in the
southern Golan Heights and Syrian forces had reached the edge of
the plateau, overlooking the Jordan River. This crisis brought Israel
to nuclear alert.

Defense Minister Moshe Dayan told the Prime Minister Golda
Meir that “this is the end of the third temple,” referring to an
impending collapse of the state of Israel. “Temple” was also the
code word for nuclear weapons. The Israelis assembled 13 twenty-
kiloton atomic bombs. The Jericho missiles and the nuclear strike F-
4s were armed and prepared for action against Syrian and Egyptian
targets. They also targeted Damascus with nuclear capable long-
range artillery. U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger was notified
of the alert several hours later on the morning of October 9. The
U.S. decided to open an aerial resupply pipeline to Israel, and Israeli
aircraft began picking up supplies that day.99

There are other aspects of the Samson option that could
destroy the world. Aside from destroying enemy troops and
fortifications the enemy’s oil fields might be targeted. Exercising the
Samson option would raise the price of gasoline to $50 a gallon. It



would also raise radiation levels and cancer rates throughout the
world and contaminate the food supply. The West has a strategic
interest, like it or not, in making sure there is not going to be another
Holocaust, this time a nuclear Holocaust, not only out of moral
considerations but out of practical ones, because an atomic war in
the Middle East could destroy Western Civilization. This is an
entirely different ballgame than when the West stood by and let the
Nazis slaughter at least 6 million defenseless Jews, something Jews
will never let happen again. That is why Paul’s Iranian policy of
using Iran as a proxy to destroy Israel is irrational because of the
Israeli nuclear arsenal. The only way it makes sense is if the mass
murder of Jews, despite the consequences, is your main goal.

The United States has no choice. It must join Israel if Israel
decides to destroy the Iranian bomb factories: If Israel strikes Iran’s
bomb factories unilaterally it is unlikely it could cripple Iran’s
retaliatory capacity. Iran looks at Israel as an American proxy and
would retaliate against the United States even if the United States
had no involvement in the strike. But if American and NATO joined
in a strike against Iran, Iran could be brought to its knees and it
would be much more difficult for it to retaliate. I must reiterate. If it
means the destruction of Israel, Ron Paul doesn’t care what the
consequences are for America. Hatred for Jews is in his blood just
as it was in Adolf Hitler’s and Hitler ultimately destroyed Germany.
One has to understand his mentality which was best articulated by
Willis Carto “If Satan himself, with all of his superhuman genius and
diabolical ingenuity at his command, had tried to create a
permanent disintegration and force for the destruction of the
nations, he could have done no better than to invent the Jews.”



Ron Paul is Iran’s best friend in Congress. Paul’s pro-Iranian
stance dates back to at least December 1979 when he voted
against awarding compensation to the hostages who had just
returned from Iran. In Big-Government Solutions Don’t Work
(September 7, 2006) Paul said,

In 1953, the U.S. and British overthrew the
democratically elected Mohammed Mossadegh and
installed the Shah. His brutal regime lasted for over
25 years and ended with the Ayatollah taking power
in 1979. Our support for the Shah incited the
radicalization of the Shiite clerics in Iran, resulting in
the hostage takeover.

Everything is America’s fault, radical Islam has no responsibility
for Iran becoming a theocracy. During Paul’s appearance on the
Alex Jones bogus conspiracy show, Paul called allegations that Iran
had attempted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United
States a “propaganda stunt” of the Obama administration. Paul:

Well, obviously, if we’re doing it [assassinating the
Iranian nuclear scientists] we shouldn’t be doing it.

But this is an act of terrorism and we sympathize with
them, they’re victims of terrorism and we condemn all

Obviously the Iranian government wouldn’t be killing
their own scientists, so we should have great
empathy for them. If we haven’t done it, we should
prove to them or give them all reassurance that we
have not done it.

In answer to your questions, if we are doing it, we
ought to quit. That wouldn’t make any sense.

You know, participating in violent acts that would be
equivalent to terrorism. At the same time, that’s all
we talk about, going around the world in the global
war on terrorism, so there’d be no consistency there.
Well, it’s a real mess; we should have done a lot less
a lot sooner. Everybody knows we have CIA that’s
[sic] maneuvering in Iran. We had a drone shot down
– maybe 2 drones shot down over Iran. We’re getting
ready to put very punishing sanctions on them and
disrupting the oil market. And you know, they’re a
very weak nation. They’re responding in a natural
way. But they don’t want trouble because they know
they can be annihilated in about 40 minutes either by
Israel or the United states. This whole idea that they
want a fight, I think that is all concoction of the West
to prepare the people for a war that is likely to come
when we have a policy like this. I think it makes the
perfect argument for my non-interventionist foreign
policy when we shouldn’t be engaged and stirring up

And all these things we do to try to get rid of the
regime in Iran right now actually plays into their


hands because once we interfere and put on
sanctions, this brings the Iranian people together.
They’re having elections in a few months and
Ahmadinejad is not that strong politically. But when
we interfere as outsiders, those who are struggling to
get control of their government and have a more
sensible government, we have to drive them into the
arms of the government. Just as we were brought
together after 9-11, where there were no dissenters,
we came together, there were no Republicans or
Democrats, so we have to try to understand how our
policies actually do the opposite of what we intend
them to do.100

Paul sympathized with the Iranians. He didn’t want to see their
scientists killed as he wanted them alive so they could produce an
atomic device that will be used to wipe Israel off the face of the map.
He is acting as a propagandist for Israel’s enemies. The last thing
he wants to see is Iran’s bomb factories destroy by the United
States due to some concocted idea that Iran wants a war. Paul
opposed sanctions against Iran because he wants to see them



economically strong with plenty of funds for their “destroy Israel”
plans. In 2009 he stated:

I rise in strongest opposition to this new round of
sanctions on Iran, which is another significant step
toward a US war on that country. I find it shocking
that legislation this serious and consequential is
brought up in such a cavalier manner. Suspending
the normal rules of the House to pass legislation is a
process generally reserved for “non-controversial”
business such as the naming of post offices. Are we
to believe that this House takes matters of war and
peace as lightly as naming post offices?101

Statement on Mark-up of HR 1905, the Iran Threat Reduction
Act of 2011 House Foreign Affairs Committee - Rep. Ron Paul, M.D.
November 2, 2011:

I would like to express my concerns over the Iran
Threat Reduction Act of 2011 and my opposition to it
being brought to the Floor for a vote. Let us be clear
on one critical matter: the sanctions against Iran
mandated by this legislation are definite steps toward
a US attack on Iran. They will also, if actually applied,
severely disrupt global trade and undermine the US
economy, thereby harming our national security. I am
surprised and disturbed that the committee viewed
this aggressive legislation to be so bipartisan and
uncontroversial that a recorded vote was not even
called. Some may argue that we are pursuing
sanctions so as to avoid war with Iran, but recent
history teaches us otherwise. For how many years
were sanctions placed on Iraq while we were told



they were necessary to avoid war? Thousands of
innocent Iraqis suffered and died under US sanctions
and still the US invaded, further destroying the
country. Are we safer after spending a trillion dollars
or more to destroy Iraq and then rebuild it? These
new sanctions against Iran increasingly target other
countries that seek to trade with Iran. The legislation
will severely punish foreign companies or foreign
subsidiaries of US companies if they do not submit to
the US trade embargo on Iran. Some 15 years after
the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 failed to bring Iran to
its knees, it is now to be US foreign policy to threaten
foreign countries and companies.
The Iran Threat Reduction Act authorizes what will
no doubt be massive amounts of US taxpayer money
to undermine the Iranian government and foment
another "Green Revolution" there. We will establish
and prop up certain factions over others, send them
enormous amounts of money, and attempt to fix any
resulting elections so that our preferred candidates
win. Considering the disturbing aftermath of our
"democracy promotion" operations in places like
Egypt, Iraq, Libya, where radical forces have
apparently come out on top, it may be fair to
conclude that such actions actually undermine US
national security rather than bolster it.


On July 18, 1994, a terrorist attack was mounted on the Jewish
community's AMIA building in Buenos Aires, Argentina, killing 85
and injuring over 250 people. The AMIA building was totally
destroyed and heavy damage was caused to the surroundings. The
attack was perpetrated by a suicide terrorist driving a car bomb
containing hundreds of kilograms of explosives. On July 15, 2008
pretending to condemn the attack on the AMIA Jewish Community
Center in Buenos Aires in July 1994 and for other purposes Ron
Paul had this to say to Congress:

Madam Speaker, as one who is most consistently
opposed to war and violence, I join my colleagues in
condemning the brutal and unjustified attack on a
Jewish community center in Argentina 14 years ago.
I do not support this resolution; however, as it
misuses a tragedy 14 years ago in a foreign country
to push for US war against Iran today. Although this
resolution clearly blames Iran and Hezbollah for the
bombing, in fact the investigation is ongoing and far
from conclusive. In an article titled “U.S. Uses Probe
to Pressure Iran” the Wall Street Journal earlier this
year suggested that renewed US interest in this 14
year old case is more related to politics than a
genuine desire for justice.

Reported the Journal,

“As tensions between the U.S. and Iran persist,
Washington and its allies are using an investigation
into a 1994 terrorist attack in Argentina to maintain
pressure on the Iranian regime. Behind the scenes,
Bush administration officials are encouraging the
probe, which centers on the bombing of a Jewish
community center in Buenos Aires. One U.S. goal is
to cause legal problems for some of Iran's political
leaders. Administration officials also hope to use the
matter to highlight Iran's alleged role in financing and
supporting terrorism around the world.

Those pushing for a Unites States attack on Iran are
using this tragic event to foment fear in America
that Iran and Hezbollah are perpetrating terrorist acts
in the Western Hemisphere. This is another in an
ongoing series of resolutions we see on the House
floor pushing us toward war against Iran. I have no
doubt that we will see another similar resolution on
the floor next week, and the week after, and so on
until we find ourselves making another tragic mistake
as we did in 2002 with H J Res 114 giving the
president the authority to attack Iraq. I urge my
colleagues to resist this push to war with Iran before
it is too late.102

Once again Paul defended Iran by saying that there is no
conclusive evidence that they were involved in the terrorist attack.
Argentinean authorities conducted an extensive investigation into
the AMIA attack, with significant international cooperation, and
concluded that "the decision to carry out the AMIA attack was made,



and the attack was orchestrated, by the highest officials of the
Islamic Republic of Iran at the time, and that these officials
instructed Lebanese Hezbollah -- a group that has historically been
subordinated to the economic and political interests of the Tehran
regime -- to carry out the attack." Iran and Hezbollah each had their
own reasons for wanting to attack Israeli or Jewish targets in
Argentina in 1994, as they had just two years earlier when they
bombed the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires. At the time, Tehran
was furious over Buenos Aires' decision to cease all nuclear
cooperation with Iran in 1992 for fear that Iran's nuclear program
was not limited to peaceful purposes. In 1994, Argentina terminated
its nuclear cooperation. Hezbollah, meanwhile, sought to avenge
the Israeli assassination of its leader, Abbas Moussawi, in 1992,
and then Israel's capture of Hezbollah ally Mustapha Dirani in
Southern Lebanon in May 1994. But Ron Paul knows better, his
investigation was more far-reaching than that of the Argentine
Government. On April 5, 2006 Paul delivered this pro-Iranian
speech entitled Iran - The Next Neocon Target:

If Iran had a nuclear weapon, why would this be
different from Pakistan, India, and North Korea
having one? Why does Iran have less right to a
defensive weapon than these other countries? If Iran
had a nuclear weapon, the odds of her initiating an
attack against anybody-- which would guarantee her
own annihilation -- are zero. And the same goes for
the possibility she would place weapons in the hands
of a non-state terrorist group. There’s been a lot of
misinformation regarding Iran’s nuclear program.
This distortion of the truth has been used to pump up
emotions in Congress to pass resolutions
condemning her and promoting UN sanctions.

IAEA Director General Mohamed El-Baradi has never
reported any evidence of “undeclared” sources or


special nuclear material in Iran, or any diversion of
nuclear material.

We demand that Iran prove it is not in violation of
nuclear agreements, which is asking them impossibly
to prove a negative. El-Baradi states Iran is in
compliance with the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPT) required IAEA safeguard agreement.

We forget that the weapons we feared Saddam
Hussein had been supplied to him by the U.S., and
we refused to believe UN inspectors and the CIA that
he no longer had them. Likewise, Iran received her
first nuclear reactor from us. Now we’re hysterically
wondering if someday she might decide to build a
bomb in self interest.

There are some who may not agree strongly with any
of my arguments, and instead believe the
propaganda: Iran and her President, Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, are thoroughly irresponsible and have
threatened to destroy Israel. So all measures must
be taken to prevent Iran from getting nukes-- thus the
campaign to intimidate and confront Iran.

First, Iran doesn’t have a nuke and is nowhere close
to getting one, according to the CIA. If they did have
one, using it would guarantee almost instantaneous
annihilation by Israel and the United States.
Hysterical fear of Iran is way out of proportion to

Paul wants to see Iran get nuclear weapons more than anything
in the world. He calls them “defensive weapons.” But what country is

103. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 358


Iran threatened by? Paul quotes El-Baradi the former head of the
International Atomic Energy Agency as saying that Iran is not
developing a bomb. IAEA has now joined the ranks of those who
are warning of the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran. Iran is quite
possibly developing nuclear bombs -- with this assessment, the
IAEA has taken a clear stance against Tehran for the first
time. Under former director general, Egypt's Mohamed El-Baradi,
who headed the IAEA from 1997 to 2009, the reports from the
Vienna-based agency always read the same: The IAEA had asked
Iran for more cooperation and transparency, but Tehran had turned
a deaf ear and only granted limited access to IAEA inspectors. Year
after year, the conclusions that El-Baradei drew from the brief
reports sounded similar: There was no proof against the Iranians, so
they were left alone. In 2009, he was succeeded by Yukiya Amano
of Japan who reported that a weapons program was indeed
underway. Paul wants Israel to wait until Tel Aviv is destroyed then
retaliate. During a town hall meeting in December 2011 Paul was
asked what President Paul would do about Iran:

Well I’d be provoking them a lot less because they’re
reacting to the provoking of the West saying “we’re
gonna put on sanctions.” We have them surrounded
with nuclear weapons and we’re claiming that they’re
gonna build a nuclear weapon and there’s no
evidence for this. So we’re just looking for trouble.
We’re building the war propaganda against Iran just
as we did against Iraq. And people want to go to war
against Iran. And I think they’re reacting to the
provocations of so many other people saying that
“we’re liable to bomb you because you are building a
nuclear weapon.” But our CIA doesn’t confirm that
nor does the UN confirm that. So they’re acting
actually in a rational manner because they’re saying
“they’re gonna attack us and start bombing us.” They
have to say “well, we don’t have any nuclear


weapons, we can’t really defend ourselves. So we
might sink a boat, sink a ship out there in the Persian
Gulf”, hoping that we might back off. I just think we’re
treating the whole thing wrong.

Paul knows that Iran is attempting to construct an atomic
weapon to use against Israel so he does everything he can to
facilitate this project. He twists the truth and accuses America of
provoking a peaceful Iran. By the time Paul gave this speech there
was plenty of evidence Iran is building the bomb from the UN
inspectors yet he disregards it. Is Paul on some intelligence
committee in Congress that makes him privy to classified
information? This is a lie that Paul knows to be untrue. But what do
you expect from a lying Nazi scum? Notice how Paul never
mentions Israel by name but says “so many other people.” If he
used to word Israel too often people would get a better idea of
where he is really coming from. Paul says that the threat to sink
ships passing through the Straits of Harmuz with conventional
weapons means Iran lacks atomic weapons. There is no logic there
just propaganda. Paul’s most convincing argument is that America
is “building the war propaganda against Iran just as we did against
Iraq.” This is why a lot of Iraqi vets support Paul.


There is an Aesop fable about a shepherd boy who pretended
that his flock was threatened by a wolf. When the villagers came to
help him he told them “I was just puttin’ you on” and laughed. "Don't
cry 'wolf', shepherd boy," said the villagers, "when there's no wolf!"
They went grumbling back down the hill back to their village. When
a real wolf came along and the boy shouted Wolf! Wolf! no one
believed him and the boy was eaten alive. The neo-cons cried
“wolfowitz” when it came to the dangers emanating from Iraq and
now when a real danger of WMDs comes from Iran, their warnings
and the warning of others are discredited.


The New York Times reported “[Those who believe Iran is
developing a bomb] criticize the C.I.A. for being overly cautious in its
assessments of Iran, suggesting that it is perhaps over-
compensating for its faulty intelligence assessments in 2002 about
Iraq’s purported weapons programs, which turned out not to exist.”
The Times also reported:

Haunting such discussions [of Iran’s nuclear
weapons program] is the memory of the Iraq war.
The intelligence on weapons of mass destruction,
which was one of the Bush administration’s main
rationales for the invasion, proved to be devastatingly
wrong. And the news media, including The New York
Times, which ultimately apologized to readers for
some of its coverage of claims of Iraqi weapons of
mass destruction, are again under scrutiny by critics
wary of exaggerated threats.104

The neo-cons are responsible for
the rise of Ron Paul and Nazism
in America. When they instigated
the war in Iraq they played right
into the hands of the Nazis who
claimed that the Jews were
behind almost all major wars.
Neo-con Paul Wolfowitz and his
crew followed the wishes of the
rightwing Likud Party, that wanted revenge for the SCUD missiles
that hit Israel during the Gulf War, missiles that had the potential to
turn Israel into one big gas chamber, missiles that could have killed
Wolfowitz’s sister who lives in Israel, or could have killed Wolfowitz



himself, who was visiting Israel during these attacks.105 Israelis had
to drape plastic across their windows and wear gas masks not
knowing what those warheads contained. They were terrorized by
Saddam who should have been taken out immediately however the
US did not want Israel involved in the war. Later there was no
reprisal against Iraq for this act of war and this made Israel appear
weak. In 1992, while he was working under then-Defense Secretary
Dick Cheney, Wolfowitz, upset by President George H. W. Bush’s
decision to leave Saddam Hussein's regime in place after the 1991
Gulf War argued in a draft version of a Defense Policy Guidance
paper that the U.S. should use pre-emptive force to prevent
countries from developing weapons of mass destruction, and act
alone if necessary. Although the draft guidance was quashed soon
after it was leaked to the New York Times, these doctrines later
found their way into George W. Bush’s national security strategy.106
Wolfowitz had planned this war years in advance. Jewish neo-cons
were placed in key positions in the Department of Defense.

Obama’s choice of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense is his
answer to the neo-cons. Ron Paul remarked:

Many who object to our continued foreign policy of
endless war and empire overseas feel encouraged
by Obama’s choice of Senator Hagel to head the
Defense Department. Hagel has shown some
admirable willingness to advise caution overseas. He
is seen as unenthusiastic over the prospects of a US
war on Iran, which is certainly to be welcomed.
Nevertheless because he does represent a more
moderate voice in foreign policy than the neo-
conservatives can tolerate, they are dragging his
name through the mud. In choosing Hagel, then, we

105. George Bush, A World Transformed, Knopf September 14, 1998.
106. Interhemispheric Resource Center Profile of Lewis Libby

can hope the president is signaling that he will
pursue a less aggressive foreign policy in his second

A massive propaganda operation was begun. The people
involved in this op were too smart to believe the lies they generated.
For example Dr. Laurie Mylroie the descendant of Holocaust
survivors received her Ph.D. in Political Science from Harvard
University and her B.A. from Cornell. She was an Assistant
Professor in Harvard's Political Science Department. In 1990 she
co-wrote, with New York Times reporter Judith Miller, the pro-war
book “Saddam Hussein and the Crisis in the Gulf.” Next, she
became an Associate Professor in the Strategy Department at the
U.S. Naval War College. Subsequently, she was a member of the
staff of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy with Martin
Indyk. Mylroie and Eleanor Wolfowitz, the former wife of Paul
Wolfowitz, who lost most of his extended family in the holocaust,
wrote Study of Revenge that alleged Ramzi Yousef, the mastermind
of the first World Trade Center bombing, was an Iraqi mole. Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who pretended that he bought
this nonsense, asked Bush to declare Ramzi Yousef an enemy
combatant and transfer him to a U.S. military installation to force
him to confess that he was actually an Iraqi intelligence agent. This
caused a top Bureau of Prisons official to make an unauthorized
entry to Yousef's cell at Florence, Admax Penitentiary to see if he
would go along with this sham in order to lessen the harshness of
his prison conditions. By 2003 this theory had been dismissed as
one that was concocted to link Saddam Hussein with 9/11, since, as
a result of the arrest of Ramzi Yousef’s uncle, Khalid Shaikh
Muhammed, his family tree was revealed, and it was demonstrated

that Yousef was not a mole but KSM’s nephew. But Mylroie
continued the deception and even did a piece for the neo-con Wall
Street Journal claiming this new evidence proved she was right.

When the CIA failed to find a link between Saddam’s
Iraq and Al-Qaeda Wolfowitz had Douglas J. Feith,
Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, form a special
unit in the Pentagon to link the two. Feith’s unit was
known as the Office of Special Plans; actually it was
the Office of War Propaganda. Before he became
part of the Wolfowitz Pack Feith “represented a leading Israeli
armaments manufacturer (the IDF – the Israeli Defense Forces) in
establishing joint ventures with leading U.S. aerospace
manufacturers for manufacture and sale of missile systems, to the
U.S. Department of Defense and worldwide.”107 A report by the
Pentagon's acting inspector general, Thomas F. Gimble, stated
Feith, ''developed, produced and then disseminated alternative
intelligence assessments on the Iraq and Al Qaeda relationship,
which included some conclusions that were inconsistent with the
consensus of the Intelligence Community, to senior decision-
makers.'' Eric S. Edelman, an undersecretary of defense, attacked
the Gimble Report. Feith was pleased that the inspector general had
cleared him of violating laws or Defense Department policies.
Richard Perle and David Wurmser aided Feith.

Richard Perle, a former aide to the pro-
Israel Senator from Washington “Scoop”
Jackson was an assistant secretary of
defense in the Reagan administration, and a
former member of George W. Bush’s
Defense Policy Board who had strong ties to
Likud. Pearle served as a consultant to Douglas Feith when Feith

107. James Zogby “Revolving Door Poses Danger to Defense” Baltimore
Sun August 7, 2001.


ran a firm that was involved with the secular government of
Turkey.108 Richard Perle resigned from the Defense Policy Board in
February 2004,109 after he called for the head of the CIA and
Defense Intelligence Agency to step down due to the fact that no
weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.110 I encountered
Perle while working as a researcher for Senator Richard Schweiker,
(R- Penn). My associate, Michael Canfield had visited Scoop
Jackson’s office and displayed the tramp shots to Perle, who was
his aide. Perle in turn called the FBI and offered to act as an
informer on Canfield.

It was no coincidence that Iraqi War Hawk David Wurmser was
married to an Israeli terrorism expert at the Hudson Institute, Meyrav
Wurmser. Her Ph.D. thesis was on the ideas that formed the Likud
Party. Dr. Wurmser taught political science at the United States
Naval Academy. She writes articles for such neo-con pro-Israel
publications as the Weekly Standard.111 David Wurmser was a
special advisor to Vice President Cheney and a former Director of
Middle East Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, which was
behind the Iraqi National Congress. The AEI had published a book
written by a man who claimed to be a former Iraqi nuclear scientist
which stated the Iraq was hard at work building an atomic bomb.

108. James Zogby New Questions About Feith Washington Watch May 13,

109. Wall Street Journal Review and Outlook February 26, 2004.
110. Eric Rosenberg “Advisor Want U.S. Intelligence Chiefs to Quit” The
Toronto Star February 18, 2004


This Attack Iraq Pack cooked up
numerous other stories of Iraq’s potential
deployment of WMD’s and attempts by
Iraq to purchase yellow cake uranium in
Niger. In his State of the Union speech on
January 28, 2003 Bush said, “The British
government has learned that Saddam
Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from
Africa.” WMD investigator Joseph C. Wilson debunked this lie in
February 2002 and as a result neo-con “Scooter” Libby released the
fact that Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, was a CIA agent112 to the
press as a reprisal against Wilson. Wolfowitz had hired Libby in
1981 as a speechwriter and an Asia analyst at the State Department
under President Ronald Reagan and in 1989 as a strategist in the
Defense Department, headed by Cheney in the administration of
George H. W. Bush. Between government stints, Libby practiced
law with the firm of Leonard Garment, counsel to President Richard
M. Nixon. Libby was convicted for perjury in connection with the
Plame Affair. Before his sentence was commuted he was hired by
the Hudson Institute.113

This grouping thought it represented the interests of Israel but
ultimately these deceptions could be a contributing factor to the
destruction of the Jewish State. The neo-cons removal of Saddam
shifted the balance of power to Iran. It also shifted the balance of
power in the Republican Party. These know-it-alls gave Ron Paul, a
Nazi intent on the destruction of Israel, ammunition to use against
his Republican rivals. Now Paul can put forth the irrational argument
that if Iran had nuclear weapons it might contribute to world peace:




I do not quite have the concern that others have
expressed that Iran is on the verge of having a
nuclear weapon. They have never been found in
violation. There has been a lot of talk and a lot of
accusation, but technically they have never been
found in any violation. There has been no talk, it has
been implied, but there has been no serious talk that
Iran is a threat to our national security. There is no
way. Even if they had nuclear weapons, they are not
going to be a threat to our national security. Pakistan,
that is not a democratic nation. It happens to be a
military dictatorship. They have nuclear weapons.
India has nuclear weapons. As a matter of fact, the
nuclear weapons serve as a balance of power
between two countries. The Soviets, had 30,000
nuclear weapons, and we followed a policy of
containment. We did not say we have to go into the
Soviet Union and bomb their establishment. No.
Finally that problem dissipated. And yet we create
unnecessary problems for ourselves. We go looking
for trouble, and I see this as very detrimental for what
we are doing with this resolution.114

Shi‘a teachings promise the return of a messiah. For some
Shi‘a the messiah will be Muhammad al-Mahdi the Twelfth Imam,
who went into occultation in 874 AD and is expected to return before
the Day of Judgment to lead the righteous against the forces of evil.
The Soviets did not believe that the destruction of Israel will bring
about the return of the Mahdi, the Iranians do, nor did the Soviets
believe in an afterlife in an Islamic paradise.

Iran has made it very clear that it wishes to destroy Israel. This
is from the semi-official Iranian news agency.



Tehran, October 26 – Iran’s President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad called for Israel to be “wiped off the
map.” “The establishment of the Zionist regime was a
move by the world oppressor against the Islamic
world,” the President told a conference in Tehran
entitled The World without Zionism. “The skirmishes
in the occupied land are part of a war of destiny. The
outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined
in Palestinian land,” he said. “As the Imam said,
Israel must be wiped off the map,” said Ahmadinejad,
referring to the late founder of the Islamic Republic of
Iran, Imam Khomeini.115

The “wiped off the face of the map” quotation is a transliteration
of vanish from the page of time. The remark was made at a
conference titled World Without Zionism, a play on Karl Marx’s
World Without Jews. But when the Nazis like Stormfront and Paul
and their self-hating Jewish puppets translate it they claim that it
merely means regime change in Israel to a “non-Zionist” state. So
don’t worry about Ahmadinejad: he is not another Hitler but just
someone who wants to help out the Jews with regime change.



On Al-Quds Day 2012 (also known as Death to Israel Day) the
Iranian Hitler made it quite clear that if millions upon millions of Jews
died in an Atomic Holocaust the world would be free of evil:

It is quite clear to everyone today that Zionism
counters human perfection and human societies and
is the main cause of human decline. A minority group
that is anti-humane and corrupted and is against
divine values has been organized and is countering
all the divine values. These are deviated persons
who merely think about wealth and power and
dominating others. For more than two thousand
years, and at least four hundred years, that a small
number of Zionists have caused turbulence in human
societies and have caused irreparable loses. Slavery,
colonialism have been mainly planned by these
Zionists. World War I and II - based on clear
documents - have been aimed at domination and the
wars have been planned and designed by behind the
scenes Zionists. The Zionists since they dominated
the US administration they have brought under the
control all the affairs of the world. A few people acting
behind the scène of US administrations and they

have under the control all the points of power in the
world and they dominate all the banking system of
the world and also they have dominated the world
media. And they are using all these tools for
destroying values, cultures, nations and the
existence of countries. You see that wherever there
is a major moral destruction and decadence. You see
there are Zionists companies and corporations and
wherever there is massacre and a slaughter the
Zionists are involved.

The formation of the Zionist regime is a
pretext and an opportunity for actually supporting
certain governments, the governments that serve the
Zionists. They want to create convergence because
instead of religion, instead of God [Allah], instead of
the prophet [Mohammad], the divine book [the
Qur’an] and all the perfect values they want to
destroy all these and instead create those
governments that serve the Zionists. And the Zionist
regime is the tool that is used by the Zionists for
dominating the Middle East, and the region, and the
world. The existence of the Zionist regime is an insult
to all humanity and the destruction of the personality
and character of nations and human beings. You
know they are involved in the inter-racial [racist]
teachings. They only consider themselves as
humans and they consider others as animals. They
actually, the Zionists, consider [as] authorized the
killing of humans and the Zionist plundering the
wealth of others. You see the Western governments,
they tolerate being insulted, but they do not tolerate
any criticism of the Zionist regime and they justify all
the crimes committed by the Zionist regime, because
they rely on the Zionists and the Zionists pay them


money for propaganda. And it’s a party comprising
seven to eight thousand people and they are running
all the affairs. It’s a Satanic party today.

Fighting the Zionist regime is equal to
protecting the rights of all humans and also
defending human dignity and opening the way for
saving humans from colonialism and arrogance and
saving humans from poverty and misery. The whole
world should know, with the grace of God, protecting
the Zionist regime has turned into a commitment by
many countries, Western powers, on the other side.
On the other hand you see that with the grace of god
world al-Quds day has turned into a focal point for
unity and solidarity of Muslims aimed at eliminating
this fake Zionist regime. For several hundred years
humanity has been just countering the Zionists and
for several hundred for almost one hundred years
you see the nations have been captivated by the
Zionist management. You see in a big country like
the US the presidential hopefuls they have to bow
before the Zionists and show their commitment
otherwise they will not have the chance in
participating in the American elections…

Dominating Palestine has been a historical
wish by the Zionists; tens of conflicts have been set
up in order to attain this wish. And close to seventy
years designs have been made and crimes have
been committed for setting up this fake regime
Zionist regime and all the human boundaries have
been trampled upon so that the Zionist regime would
be imposed on the region. And all the might and
capabilities of the arrogant powers were used and
they managed to obtain success to some extent,
[however] exactly at a time when they thought the

Zionist regime has been stabilized and it has been
accepted by the regional nations due to a major
move by the Iranian nation known as the Islamic
Revolution guided by a divine man and subsequently
with the awareness of nations and their movement
against Zionists and the revitalization of Palestinian
resistance in the past two or three decades the
foundations of the Zionist regime has been
jeopardized and the philosophy behind its formation
has been put to question. The Zionists they felt the
danger and you see the Western nations are after
saving the Zionist regime and prior to this they were
saving the Zionist so they would have the [?] of
restoring themselves…

Most dictators trample upon the rights on
nations. The majority of these dictators depend on
the Zionists and the arrogants. These dictators have
no way but to be dependent on them. But hopefully
the nations have been awakened and they are
demanding their rights. All nations have been
captivated even in the United States and Europe.
Most governments in the West are affiliated to the
Zionists and the people have no right to choose.
They [the Zionists] have formed several parties and
in fact when they become tired of one party they
have no choice but to depend on, resort to, another
party and all these parties are after serving the
Zionists. And you see the people are shouting in the
US and Europe but there is no one to save the

And of course the existence of the Zionist
regime is a guarantee for this plundering. It’s a base,
it’s a focal point. The arrogant powers overlook the
dignity and respect of all humans including Muslims.

A Muslim nation can destroy all these arrogant
powers and justice is the opposite aside of arrogance
and they will victimize everything and in order to
obtain power and wealth and any negligence can
cause irreparable losses. Any negligence will cause a

Today they are engaged in a complicated
scheme and that means a two state plan. The Zionist
regime is a cancerous tumor. Even a single
cancerous cell in an inch of the Palestine land the
same situation will continue in the future. The
Zionists are domineering elements and want to they
are after expansionism. An academic colleague of
ours who is at the US met me in one of my trips
overseas. I mean an Iranian met me he said that you
are right concerning the Zionists. He said we were
working in an academic team and there was a single
person who was a pro-Zionist he wanted to become
a member and the other 15 members opposed his
membership and he just kept coming and going and I
felt pity and I asked the other members for this pro-
Zionist person to become a member of the academic
board after six or seven years I returned and I saw
none of the members are present there and all of the
members are new and find one of those old members
and I say what happened to the team and he said
that single pro Zionist person has in fact led to the
expulsion of all the other members and he has
brought his pro-Zionist friends to become members
of that academic board.

The presence of the Zionist in a single inch of
the Palestinian lands is dangerous let alone having a
government there. This is my understanding of the
ongoing situation. This is my personal understanding

and this is my understanding this is the scheme that
has been designed do not level any allegations
against me later on this is my personal understanding
and in fact the Zionists are after just having a
theatrical performance and they later would say that
okay we going accept a two state government, a
person over the line would be granted to Palestinians
the Zionists would become independent and even if
ten percent of the land is given to the Zionist that
would still be dangerous and a two state solution
means a historical for the Zionists to restore
themselves and in fact accepting the two state
solution means just losing and eliminating all the
efforts that have been made for hundreds of years.
And any person who accepts that two state solution
he won’t be in line with the interest of world nations.
All world nations must pay attention to this - the
criterion for the honesty of rulers and politicians is
contingent on restoring the rights of nations and also
combating the Zionist regime. One cannot say that
he is that he is after restoring the rights of nations
and he is in line with the Zionist policies then one
cannot believe in him. It is not possible to have a
person who doesn’t combat the Zionist regime who
reconciles and compromises with the Zionist regime
and at the same time he cannot claim to be an
advocate of freedom. So one should be cautious so
that the NATO forces will not claim to be advocates
of freedom and freedom will not be established with
the bullets of NATO forces. What matters is the
independence and the basic rights of nations.

In conclusion I want to address the arrogant
powers and the Zionists. Open your ears! The spring
you spoke about is not merely an Arabist spring. This


is a starting point. An Arabist spring is good but you
should know that the spring of humanity will unfold.
The Western and American springs will be unfolded
soon with the grace of Allah.

The nations are going through the process of
awaking. How much longer can you engage in acts of
deception? He said that I want to make a change and
everybody thought that he wants to make a change
everyone thought he wants to make changes within
in the US and later he said that he meant the
changes in the Middle East. I am telling you it is to
your benefit to set the Zionists aside and recognize
the rights of nations and also recognize your interests
and pursue your interests within your own
geographical borders. You should know that a new
spring will be unfolding if you do not pay attention to
this piece of advice. The nations will in fact contribute
to your decline.

Stop supporting the Zionist regime and they
will be of no use for you. The regional nations have
been awakened. Perhaps though instigating tribal
differences you may have a chance for a short period
of time. This will be for the short term. You should
honestly help the regional nations. You should know
that very soon the nations will soon eliminate and put
an end to the Zionist regime.

You are after a new Middle East and we are
also after a new Middle East. A new Middle East will
definitely take shape but with the grace of Allah and
the help of nations there will be no trace of the
existence of the Americans and the Zionists.


Stop insulting the Iranian nation and correct your
literature. You should be friends of the Iranian nation
that is your benefit and the Iranian nation has always
managed to bury all its ill wishes in the course of
history and you are the weakest and the same will
happen to you and this will only bring about
embarrassment for you will bring about shame for
you and the domination of the Zionists will be
destroyed and we have bright prospect ahead.
Communism is gone and capitalism will also be
destroyed and the Imam of the time will establish the
divine governance and the true prosperity of
humanity will be materialized and we hope for such a

Let’s dispense with the theory, put forth by many self-hating
Jews on the Left, that Ahmadinejad only hates Zionists and not
Jews. Ahmadinejad made it clear that he is referring to Jews when
he uses the word Zionist.

For more than two thousand years, and at least four
hundred years, that a small number of Zionists have
caused turbulence in human societies and have
caused irreparable loses – Ahmadinejad.

There was no Zionist movement 2,000 years ago however there
were Jews. Hitler:

Today, after two thousand years, with
deepest emotion I recognize more
profoundly than ever before - the fact
that it was for this that He had to shed
His blood upon the Cross. As a
Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be
cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth
and justice. And as a man I have the duty to see to it


that human society does not suffer the same
catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the
ancient world some two thousand years ago - a
civilization which was driven to its ruin through this
same Jewish people. - Munich April 12, 1922

It is quite clear to everyone today that Zionism
counters human perfection and human societies and
is the main cause of human decline – Ahmadinejad.

In Mein Kampf, Hitler wrote that the Jews were responsible for all
the evil and troubles in the world. This idea was reflected in the
propaganda pamphlet (1930) of the Nazi propagandist Goebbels:

Why do we oppose the Jews? We are
enemies of the Jews, because we are
fighters for the freedom of the German
people. The Jew is the cause and the
beneficiary of our misery…he is the real
cause for our loss of the Great War…that
is the reason why we, as nationalists and as
socialists, oppose the Jew. He has corrupted our
race, fouled our morals, undermined our customs,
and broken our power. The Jew is the plastic demon
of the decline of mankind. . . .We are enemies of the
Jews because we belong to the German people. The
jaw is our greatest misfortune. .

The Nazi Rudolph Hess expressed the same views
according to the retired medical superintendent of a British Prison,
Dr N. R. Phillips, “In my experience Hess’s strongest delusion was
in regard to the Jews. He regarded them as responsible for all the
troubles in the world. He thought they exercised a hypnotic influence


over everyone and had a hand in everything unpleasant that
happened, even to himself.”116

World War I and II - based on clear documents -
have been aimed at domination and the wars have
been planned and designed by behind the scenes
Zionists – Ahmadinejad.

Who triggered the first and second world wars, that
left seventy millions killed and hundreds of millions
injured or homeless? Who used nuclear bomb
against defenseless people, and stockpiled
thousands of warheads in their arsenals? –
Ahmadinejad UN Speech 2011

Ahmadinejad objected to the A-bomb being dropped
on Nazi ally Japan. What these statements reveal is that we
are dealing with someone who is totally insane. Hitler
believed in conspiracy theories that regarded the Jews as
Communists and claimed that they had deliberately made
Germany lose World War I by causing strikes, subversion
and revolution on the home front. He also said that they had
deliberately caused the Great Depression. Hitler never said
the Jews CAUSED World War I. He also blamed the Jews
for the surrender of the Germans and the Treaty of
Versailles and for the disarmament that followed.

But the politicians of the Right deserve
exactly the same reproach. It was through
their miserable cowardice that those
ruffians of Jews who came into power in
1918 were able to rob the nation of its

116. The Madness of Rudolph Hess - and the Places It Led Him


arms. The conservative politicians have neither right
nor reason on their side when they appeal to
disarmament as the cause which compelled them to
adopt a policy of prudence (that is to say, cowardice).
Here, again, the contrary is the truth. Disarmament is
the result of their lack of spirit. - Mein Kampf.

You see that wherever there is a major moral
destruction and decadence. You see there are
Zionists companies and corporations and wherever
there is massacre and a slaughter the Zionists are
involved – Ahmadinejad.

What soon gave me cause for very
serious consideration were the activities
of the Jews in certain branches of life,
into the mystery of which I penetrated
little by little. Was there any shady
undertaking, any form of foulness,
especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew
did not participate? On putting the probing knife
carefully to that kind of abscess one immediately
discovered, like a maggot in a putrescent body, a
little Jew who was often blinded by the sudden light -
Mein Kampf.

A few people acting behind the scène of US
administrations and they have under the control all
the points of power in the world and they dominate all
the banking system of the world and also they have
dominated the world media – Ahmadinejad.

I gradually discovered that the Social
Democratic Press was predominantly
controlled by Jews. But I did not attach
special importance to this circumstance,
for the same state of affairs existed also

in other newspapers. But there was one striking fact
in this connection. It was that there was not a single
newspaper with which Jews were connected that
could be spoken of as National, in the meaning that
my education and convictions attached to that word -
Mein Kampf.

The function of the so-called liberal Press was to dig
the grave for the German people and REICH. No
mention need be made of the lying Marxist Press. To
them the spreading of falsehood is as much a vital
necessity as the mouse is to a cat. Their sole task is
to break the national backbone of the people, thus
preparing the nation to become the slaves of
international finance and its masters, the Jews - Mein

From the political point of view it is not in the interests
of Great Britain that Germany should be ruined even
still more, but such a proceeding would be very much
in the interests of the international money-markets
manipulated by the Jew - Mein Kampf.

A minority group that is anti-humane and corrupted
and is against divine values has been organized and
is countering all the divine values – Ahmadinejad.

Their very existence is an incarnate denial of the
beauty of God's image in His creation. - Mein Kampf.

Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned by
these Zionists – Ahmadinejad.

That is why the Jewish people, despite
the intellectual powers with which they
are apparently endowed, have not a
culture--certainly not a culture of their


own. The culture which the Jew enjoys to-day is the
product of the work of others and this product is
debased in the hands of the Jew - Mein Kampf.

And it’s a party comprising seven to eight thousand
people and they are running all the affairs. It’s a
Satanic party today – Ahmadinejad.

By presenting his doctrine as part and
parcel of a just re-vindication of social
rights, the Jew propagated the doctrine
all the more effectively. But at the same
time he provoked the opposition of
decent people who refused to admit these demands
which, because of the form and pseudo-philosophical
trimmings in which they are presented, seemed
fundamentally unjust and impossible for realization.
For, under the cloak of purely social concepts there
are hidden aims which are of a Satanic character -
Mein Kampf.

He will stop at nothing. His utterly low-down conduct
is so appalling that one really cannot be surprised if
in the imagination of our people the Jew is pictured
as the incarnation of Satan and the symbol of evil -
Mein Kampf.

And the Zionist regime is the tool that is used by the
Zionists for dominating the Middle East, and the
region, and the world. The existence of the Zionist
regime is an insult to all humanity and the destruction
of the personality and character of nations and
human beings – Ahmadinejad.

The Jewish domination in the State
seems now so fully assured that not only
can he now afford to call himself a Jew

once again, but he even acknowledges freely and
openly what his ideas are on racial and political
questions. A section of the Jews avows itself quite
openly as an alien people, but even here there is
another falsehood. When the Zionists try to make the
rest of the world believe that the new national
consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the
establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the
Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the
simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest
intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so
as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to
establish a central organization for their international
swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this
cannot be controlled by any of the other States.
Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who
have been found out and at the same time a high-
school for the training of other swindlers - Mein

You see that wherever there is a major moral
destruction and decadence. You see there are
Zionists companies and corporations and wherever
there is massacre and a slaughter the Zionists are
involved – Ahmadinejad.

On April 1, 1933, a week after Hitler became dictator of Germany,
he ordered a boycott of Jewish shops, banks, offices and
department stores.

They want to create convergence because instead of
religion, instead of God [Allah], instead of the prophet
[Mohammad], the divine book [the Qur’an] and all the
perfect values they want to destroy all these and
instead create those governments that serve the
Zionists – Ahmadinejad.


Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance
with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending
myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of
the Lord - Mein Kampf.

The existence of the Zionist regime is an insult to all
humanity and the destruction of the personality and
character of nations and human beings. You know
they are involved in the inter-racial [racist] teachings.
They only consider themselves as humans and they
consider others as animals. They actually, the
Zionists, consider [as] authorized the killing of
humans and the Zionist plundering the wealth of
others – Ahmadinejad.

The Nazis are found of making reference to the Talmudic
passage known as Baba Mezia 114a-114b. This is made reference
to in the Jew hating forgery, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, one
of Hitler’s favorite books.

To what extent the whole existence of
this people is based on a continuous lie is
shown incomparably by the Protocols of
the Wise Men of Zion, so infinitely hated
by the Jews. They are based on a
forgery; the Frankfurter Zeitung moans
and screams once every week: the best proof that
they are authentic. What many Jews may do
unconsciously is here consciously exposed. And that
is what matters. It is completely indifferent from what
Jewish brain these disclosures originate; the
important thing is that with positively terrifying
certainty they reveal the nature and activity of the
Jewish people and expose their inner contexts as
well as their ultimate final aims. The best criticism
applied to them, however, is reality. Anyone who

examines the historical development of the last
hundred years from the standpoint of this book will at
once understand the screaming of the Jewish press.
For once this book has become the common property
of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered
as broken

The Protocols claimed this is a Talmudic passage: "The Jews are
human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings,
but beasts." Here is an accurate translation:

R. Shimon b. Yochai said: Graves of non-Jews do
not transmit ritual impurity, as it is written, "And you,
my flock, the flock of my pastures, you are Adam"
(Ezekiel 34:31) --only you are called "Adam."

We learn the law of ritual impurity from another verse that uses
the word "Adam." "Only you are called 'Adam'" means that the term
"Adam"-"man"-in particular applies to Jews. Other words, such as
"Ha'adam" - "the man" - also apply to non-Jews. So the Gomorra is
saying that the word "Adam" without the definite article only refers to
Jews. This passage in the Talmud says nothing at all about who is a
human being. Genesis states that we are all descendants of Adam
and Eve making everyone human. And besides that, the supposed
quote contains a completely fabricated sentence: "They are beasts."

It was Hitler who labeled people as sub-human
untermenchen, not the Talmud or Gomorra. During a speech in May
1923, Hitler had said, "The Jews are undoubtedly a race, but not
human. They cannot be human in the sense of being an image of
God, the Eternal. The Jews are the image of the Devil.”

Today they are engaged in a complicated scheme
and that means a two state plan. The Zionist regime
is a cancerous tumor. Even a single cancerous cell in
an inch of the Palestine land the same situation will
continue in the future – Ahmadinejad.

In 1941 Hitler proclaimed “The Jews are a cancer on the
breast of Germany.” On September 16, 1919, Hitler issued his first
written comment on the so-called Jewish Question. He defined the
Jews as a race and not a religious community, characterized the
effect of a Jewish presence as a “race-tuberculosis of the peoples,"
and identified the initial goal of a German government to be
discriminatory legislation against Jews.

You are after a new Middle East and we are also
after a new Middle East. A new Middle East will
definitely take shape but with the grace of Allah and
the help of nations there will be no trace of the
existence of the Americans and the Zionists.

The ultimate goal must definitely be the removal of
the Jews altogether! – Hitler 1919.

And it’s a party comprising seven to eight thousand people and they
are running all the affairs. It’s a Satanic party today.

At the beginning of the War, or even
during the War, if twelve or fifteen
thousand of these Jews who were
corrupting the nation had been forced to
submit to poison-gas, just as hundreds
of thousands of our best German
workers from every social stratum and from every
trade and calling had to face it in the field, then the
millions of sacrifices made at the front would not
have been in vain. On the contrary: If twelve
thousand of these malefactors had been eliminated
in proper time probably the lives of a million decent
men, who would be of value to Germany in the
future, might have been saved. But it was in
accordance with bourgeois 'statesmanship' to hand
over, without the twitch of an eyelid, millions of


human beings to be slaughtered on the battlefields,
while they looked upon ten or twelve thousand public
traitors, profiteers, usurers and swindlers, as the
dearest and most sacred national treasure and
proclaimed their persons to be inviolable. Indeed it
would be hard to say what is the most outstanding
feature of these bourgeois circles: mental debility,
moral weakness and cowardice, or a mere down at
heel mentality. It is a class that is certainly doomed to
go under but, unhappily, it drags down the whole
nation with it into the abyss - Mein Kampf.

The whole world should know, with the grace of God,
protecting the Zionist regime has turned into a
commitment by many countries, Western powers, on
the other side – Ahmadinejad.

And the same is true of democracy. In general even
in the early days both England and France had
already been bound with the fetters of slavery. With, I
might say, a brazen security these States are fettered
with Jewish chains.117 – Hitler 1922

Slavery, colonialism have been mainly planned by
these Zionists. World War I and II - based on clear
documents - have been aimed at domination and the
wars have been planned and designed by behind the
scenes Zionists – Ahmadinejad.

Although the Jews were lurking unseen as wire-
pullers in the background - Mein Kampf.

It is clear that Ahmadinejad is a follower of Adolf Hitler
and considers himself the new Hitler, but according to Paul
Ahmadinejad poses no threat to the United States or Israel,



even with nuclear weapons. Paul wants to lift economic
sanctions on Iran. He wants to re-establish diplomatic
relations with Iran. Paul loves Ahmadinejad because he
knows he is a Nazi who wants to murder millions of Jews
and Paul is also a Nazi who wants to murder millions of
Jews so Paul uses him as his proxy.

Paul has to use code words but just as Hitler made it
clear to German people what he had in store for the Jews
Ahmadinejad does the same: May 11, 2006 to a student rally
in Jakarta, Indonesia “Israel is a regime based on evil that
cannot continue and one day will vanish.” This is from the
Iranian Hitler’s speeches to Iran's Holocaust Conference
January 30, 2008:

I warn you to abandon the filthy Zionist entity, which
has reached the end of the line. It has lost its reason
to be and will sooner or later fall. The ones who still
support the criminal Zionists should know that the
occupiers' days are numbered. … Accept that the life
of Zionists will sooner or later come to an end.
Thanks to people's wishes and G-d's will the trend for
the existence of the Zionist regime is downwards and
this is what G-d has promised and what all nations
want…Just as the Soviet Union was wiped out and
today does not exist, so will the Zionist regime soon
be wiped out!!118

Representatives Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) were
the only two lawmakers who voted against a resolution condemning



Ahmadinejad for his statements calling for the destruction of Israel
and genocide of the Jews.

Mr. Speaker, I join with my colleagues here in
condemning the statement reportedly made by
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that “Israel
must be wiped off the map.” I reject this statement
and any such statement by any government
anywhere because I reject the notion that the use or
threat of violence is an appropriate way to solve
international disputes. While rejecting comments by
Iran that seem to advocate the use of force, I must
also strongly object to using Achmadinajad’s
statement as an excuse to escalate our own rhetoric
and strengthen our anti-Iranian and anti-Muslim
policies. This condemnable statement is nevertheless
being conveniently used to expand our policy of
remaking the Middle East in our own image. I do find
it interesting to hear my colleagues condemning
Iran’s implied threat of force while in the same breath
calling for the use of force against Iran. Ironically, it is
small step from repeatedly calling Iran “our enemy”
with increasingly militaristic rhetoric to calling for Iran
to be “wiped off the map.” We should keep this in
mind as we condemn the rhetoric of others while
repeating similar rhetoric ourselves.119

The resolution outlined the reasons why the Iranian leader was
in violation of the UN Genocide Convention.

119. Congressional Record, V. 151, Pt. 18, October 27 to November 7,
2005 page 24208


Calling On The United Nations Security Council To
Charge Iranian President With Certain Violations
Because Of His Calls For Destruction Of Israel

Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to
this resolution. This resolution is an exercise in
propaganda that serves one purpose: to move us
closer to initiating a war against Iran. Citing various
controversial statements by Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, this legislation demands
that the United Nations Security Council charge
Ahmadinejad with violating the 1948 Convention on
the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of

Paul opposes all international bodies that investigate and
punish world leader and military men for genocide because
someday he might be called before one:

Supporters of the International Criminal Court are
quick to say that the Court is modeled on the
Nuremberg tribunal set up after World War II, but
nothing could be further from the truth. Nuremberg
was a trial initiated and prosecuted by sovereign
nations. It was a reassertion of national sovereignty
over the crimes of a regime that disregarded the
concept that saw other sovereign countries as merely
“living space” for their own people. As one analyst
recently wrote, “the Nuremberg tribunal, unlike the
Hague tribunal, was not really an international
tribunal at all. The judges quite specifically stated that



the act of promulgating the Nuremberg charter was
‘the exercise of sovereign legislative power of the
countries to which the German Reich unconditionally
surrendered.’ There was no pretense that the
‘international community’ was prosecuting the

In October 2009, Ron Paul and Kucinich were also the only two
Members of Congress to vote against H. Res. 175 condemning the
government of Iran for “state-sponsored persecution of its Bahá’í
minority and its continued violation of the International Covenants
on Human Rights.”

The Iranians made it clear that they want to see Israel
destroyed with nuclear weapons “wiped off the map” but the Nazis,
like Paul, want to deny this to prevent Israel from launching a pre-
emptive strike. It is also not advantageous for them to admit it as it
would reveal the true nature of the Iranian régime and further alarm
certain righteous Christian elements within the United States122 like
Congresswoman Michele Bachmann:

We know without a shadow of doubt that Iran will
take a nuclear weapon, they will use it to wipe out our
ally Israel, off the face of the map. And they’ve stated
they will use it against the United States of America.
We would be fools and knaves to ignore their
purposes and their plan.

This is a posting from Stormfront praising Paul:




Paul said that the quote attributed to M. Ahmadinejad
of wanting Iran to wipe Israel off the map isn't
accurate and that he was talking about a regime
change [Zionist]...This is a very interesting answer
(even though Ron Paul was obviously very nervous
talking about that), since the only ones talking about
that were White Nationalist's (I might be wrong, but I
don't think that other politicians or media reported of
this obvious misquote) So, the question remains...
How was Ron Paul aware of that? If he's aware of
that is he also aware that USA is a ZOG empire?
And, most importantly, is he listening to Stormfront
radio in his closet?

In spring 2009, the American Council for Judaism’s Issues
publication carried an article by Yakov M. Rabkin that defended Iran
and bashed Israel. Rabkin wrote this about Ahmadinejad and
Holocaust denial:

The BBC quoted Ahmadinejad saying, “If European
countries claim that they have killed Jews in World
War II ... why don’t they provide the Zionist regime
with a piece of Europe.” While the “if” is obviously
provocative, neither this nor numerous other quotes
suggest that his goal is to deny this genocide.
Rather, he uses the memory of the mass murder of
Jews in Europe to emphasize the plight of the
Palestinians and to test the limits of the freedom of
speech obtaining in the West. He wonders why, in
the name of the freedom of expression, cartoons of
Mohammed can be published, while it is against the
law in several European countries to question or
make fun of the Nazi genocide. The competition of
Holocaust cartoons organized in Iran attracted some
plainly anti-Semitic works, complete with imagery
borrowed from the rich arsenal of European anti-

Semitic iconography. Some could be considered as
revision and even denial of the mass murder of
civilians committed in Europe in the early 1940s. This
competition caused a furor in many Western
countries, which was precisely the point the Iranian
president had wanted to make. But he did not deny
the Nazi genocide.

In his speech, when the Iranian president reportedly
first made the remark, the word “map” does not even
appear. In fact, he was rehashing one of Ayatollah
Khomeini’s decades-old anti-Zionist diatribes: Esrâ’il
bâyad az sahneyeh roozégâr mahv shavad, which
means “Israel must vanish from the page of time.”
After the canard about “wiping Israel off the map”
circled the world and entered the public mind, some
Israeli instigators of the anti-Iran campaign quietly
dropped it from further use. A recent report about
Iran published by the Jerusalem Center for Public
Affairs (JCPA), a Zionist think tank particularly active
in stirring the anti-Iran campaign, attributes the
offensive quote to Khomeini and translates it
correctly, insisting, however, that the quote is
“genocidal.” The latter term has become a favorite in
recent Zionist publications: the same report also
refers to “the failed genocidal 1948 war of several
Arab states and Palestinians against Israel.”

The American Council for Judaism is the group that Ron Paul
speaks fondly of because they are traitors to the Jewish people, sick
Jews who hate themselves for being Jewish. Why quibble over the
translation? During a rare Friday prayer lecture at Tehran University
Ayatollah Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, said

From now onward, we will support and help any
nations, any groups fighting against the Zionist

regime across the world, and we are not afraid of
declaring this. The Zionist regime is a true cancer
tumor on this region that should be cut off, and it
definitely will be cut off.123

Ron Paul knows that the Shi’ite branch is the brand of Islam is
predominant in Iran. He also knows the Shi’ite branch of Islam has
been at odds for centuries, often in violent conflict with the Sunnis.
There are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world and roughly 15% are
Shi’ia. Sunnis belong to the Salafiya branch of Islam, which regards
Shiites as little better than non-Muslims. For the Salafist-Wahhabists
being a Christian or a Jew, people of the book, is far preferable to
being Shiite – a rejectionist of the true faith.

Ron Paul is well aware that the Salafist-Wahhabists Saudis and
the Shi’ite Iranians will always be enemies. Since he supports the
Iranians he does all he can to discredit the Saudis. On November
29, 2001 in a speech entitled The War on Terrorism Paul made it
seem as if the Saudi Royal Family was responsible for 9/11.

The predominant nationality of the terrorists was
Saudi Arabian. Yet for political and economic
reasons, even with the lack of cooperation from the
Saudi government, we have ignored that country in
placing blame. The Afghan people did nothing to
deserve another war. The Taliban, of course, is
closely tied to bin Laden and al-Qaeda, but so are
the Pakistanis and the Saudis.124

In The Case For Defending America January 24, 2002:


124. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 162


Could oil be the reason we have concentrated on
bombing Afghanistan while ignoring Saudi Arabia,
even though we have never found Osama bin
Laden? Obviously, Saudi Arabia is culpable in these
terrorist attacks on the United States, and yet little is
done about it.

In reality Bin Laden did all he could to bring down the Saudi
monarchy: Ibrahim al-Reemy was a Yemeni closely linked to Osama
bin Laden and was the organizer of the attempted bombing of the
Saudi Interior Ministry building and the Special Emergency Forces
headquarters training unit at Riyadh on December 29, 2005. In the
late 1960s, Osama Bin Laden's brother Mahrous bin Laden joined a
Salafist-Wahabist sect opposed to the Saudi regime. With his
assistance, the dissidents who came to Saudi Arabia from southern
Yemen smuggled weapons into Mecca using trucks belonging to the
Bin Laden Group and attempted to take over the Al-Masjid al-
Haram ("The Holy Mosque") - the holiest mosque in the world and
the primary destination of the Hajj pilgrimage. Mahrous bin Laden
was arrested, but thanks to the family's connections with the Saudi
king, he was released after the Saudi Security determined he was
an unwitting participant. Bakr bin Laden was given a contract to
repair the damage that was done to Grand Mosque and soon rebuilt
it. Osama Bin Laden aroused so much enmity in the Saudi
Government that it put out a contract on him.

In a speech entitled A Sad State of Affairs October 25, 2001
Paul argued:

Our support for the less-than-ethical government of
Saudi Arabia, with our troops occupying what most
Muslims consider sacred land, is hardly the way to
bring peace to the Middle East. A policy driven by our
fear of losing control over the oil fields in the Middle
East has not contributed to American Security. Too
many powerful special interests drive our policy in

this region, and this does little to help us preserve
security for Americans here at home.

Paul blamed the Jews for the American presence in Saudi
Arabia just like he blames the Jews for everything else. Presently he
hates Saudi Arabia because according to The Times of London
Saudi Arabia has conducted tests to stand down its air defenses to
enable Israeli jets to make a bombing raid on Iran’s nuclear

In his speech entitled Statement Opposing Resolution on Iran
given on June 19, 2009 he argued:

Of course I do not support attempts by foreign
governments to suppress the democratic aspirations
of their people, but when is the last time we
condemned Saudi Arabia or Egypt or the many other
countries where unlike in Iran there is no opportunity
to exercise any substantial vote on political
leadership? It seems our criticism is selective and
applied when there are political points to be made. I
have admired President Obama’s cautious approach
to the situation in Iran and I would have preferred that
we in the House had acted similarly.

That is why I am introducing the “Terror Immigration
Elimination Act of 2003.” This bill will deny student
and “diversity” visas to anyone coming from a country
currently on the State Department’s list of terrorism-
sponsoring countries. Further, Mr. Speaker, it is time
we face reality regarding Saudi Arabia. We must
remember that most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi
nationals. Also, when al-Qaeda supporters were
rounded up from Afghanistan and held at Camp X-
Ray, reports showed that of the 158 prisoners more
than one hundred were Saudi nationals. With such


an evident level of involvement from Saudi nationals
in these activities, it is quite obvious that the Saudi
government is not doing all it can, or all it should, in
resolving this urgent problem. Therefore, Saudi
citizens will also be denied student and “diversity”
visas to the United States under this bill.

Ron Paul believes that the elections in Iran are not rigged by the
Revolutionary Guard. The New York Times reported on the 2012
Iranian elections: “Results of the vote have been dismissed as
meaningless by many of the opposition supporters who filled the
streets during the antigovernment protests set off by the disputed
presidential election of 2009. That was followed by a harsh
crackdown, lasting months that effectively destroyed the reformist
movement and any allied opposition.” Paul was trying to damage
relations with the Kingdom by placing its citizens on a terrorist
blacklist. In November 2010 Paul again defended Iran and attacked
the Saudis in his Texas Straight Talk newsletter:

This month the US Administration notified Congress
that it intends to complete one of the largest arms
sales in US history to one of the most repressive
regimes on earth. Saudi Arabia has been given the
green light by the administration to spend $60 billion
on some 84 new F-15 aircraft, dozens of the latest
helicopters, and other missiles, bombs, and high-tech
military products from the US weapons industry.

We are told that our increasingly aggressive policies
toward Iran are justified by that country’s rigid Islamic
laws and human-rights violations, while the even
more repressive Islamic rule in Saudi Arabia is never


Paul is far more interested in disarming the Israelis than
he is in preventing the Iranians from getting the bomb and
the capability to deliver it to Israel. Paul:

Today, the Israeli political lobby is a powerful political
force. Two to three hundred nuclear weapons, under
Israel's control, make Israel more powerful than all
the Arab and Muslim countries put together. But
that's not where the real power lies. The UN can
labor tirelessly in "controlling" one nuclear weapon (in
Iran) that doesn't exist while the international
community does not put pressure on Israel to sign
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In contrast, the
world community rarely even admits that Israel's
nukes exist—and at the same time Iran has never
been ruled in noncompliance with the NPT. The fact
that Muslim nations become annoyed with this policy
is written off by most in the West by charging anti-

Paul and Liberty Lobby have both denied being anti-Semitic
despite having been accused numerous time of being so. Carto
would claim to be only anti-Zionist and even had Jews like Sherman
Skolnick, whose parents were Warsaw Ghetto survivors, on the
Board of Liberty Lobby. Paul has a few token house Jews who

125 Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom


support him. When journalist Jack Anderson wrote the Liberty Lobby
was an anti-Semitic neo-Nazi organization Carto went as far as
suing Anderson. Liberty Lobby lost this landmark case. Paul doesn’t
come out and say “I am against Zionism” but implies this in his
books, speeches and Congressional votes. “Zionism” has become a
dog whistle word for Jews as in Achmadinajad’s “World Without
Zionism” conference. In August 2012 Paul voiced his opposition to
sanctions against Iran:

I think this bill would be better named if we called it
Obsession With Iran Act 2012. Because this is what
we continue to be doing is be obsessed with Iran and
the idea that Iran is a threat to our national security.
Iran happens to be a third world nation they have no
significant navy, air force intercontinental ballistic
missiles. The IAEA and our CIA said they are not on
the verge of a nuclear weapon. It’s so similar to what
we went though in the early part of the last decade
when we were beating the war drums to go to war
against Iraq and it was all a façade; there was no
danger from Iraq. So this is what we are doing,
beating the war drums once again. Now since the bill
has come back from the conference if we’re going to
deal with civil liberties in Syria well I happen to be a
civil libertarian I am very concerned about civil
liberties. But let me tell you this bill is not going to do
anything to enhance the civil liberties of the
individuals in Syria. Now if we were really interested
in civil liberties why wouldn’t we look to ourselves?
Why wouldn’t we look to the things we do here. What
about our warrantless searches under the Patriot
Act? What about the policy of assassination and
assassinating American citizens? What about arrests
by the military the National Defense Authorization
Act. What about the drone warfare that we go on do


you we are protecting civil liberties by arbitrarily
dropping drones anyplace in the world with innocent
people dying? If we want to really care about civil
liberties in Syria? What do we care about the civil
liberties? What about the secret prisons we have and
the history of torture in this country. What about the
fact that kill lists are being made by the executive
branch of government and we sit idly by and approve
of it by saying nothing and the American people put
up with it and we march in this direction marching
into a determination to have another war. When you
put on sanctions on a country it’s an act of war and
that’s what this is all about. The first thing you do
when war breaks out between two countries is you
put sanctions on the country, you blockade the
country. So this is an act of war. What would we do if
somebody blockaded us and put sanctions on us and
prevented the importation of any product in this
country? We’d be furious; we’d declare war we’d go
to war so we are the antagonists. We are over there
poking our nose, poking our nose in other people’s
affairs just looking for the chance to start another
war. First it’s Syria, than Iran we have too many wars
we need to stop these wars we don’t have the money
to fight these wars any longer. I am still rather
impressed with the obsession over a weapon that still
does not exist and no concern whatsoever about
many nuclear weapons that are held by countries
that never even joined the nuclear non-proliferation
treaty. It is called for in the debate that Iran should
end all its nuclear programs. But they are permitted
to have their programs under the Non Proliferation
Treaty/ And the other countries that have weapons
including the countries that hold the weapons that
came from the Soviet Union system, it seems that

that would be a much greater danger You know the
investigation by the UN or by the CIA has never
indicated that they never enrich above 20%. And they
said they would not even do it to 20% if they would
merely allow if the west would cooperate and sell
them this material they said we don’t need it. But we
need 20% enrichment for nuclear isotopes, medical
isotopes. So our refusal to deal with them prompts
them to take it up to enrichment to 20%. 5% of
course is what they are allowed to do for nuclear
energies. But this idea that we can badger people
and then defy the law what we are asking them to do
is to close down their program is you are asking them
to defy international law they agreed to this they have
a right to do this under this treaty. For us to say that
they must quit it I think it is very close to an
obsession on a country that is incapable of attacking
us. They don’t have a history of invading their
neighboring countries. The last time they were at war
was with Iraq and we bugged Iraq to go to go into
Iran. So I find this very distressing that the obsession
continues. I find it very very upsetting that this vote
will of course be overwhelmingly in support of
correcting the civil liberties of Syria and making Iran
toe the line and give up on something that they are
permitted to do. A vote for this in my opinion in time
will show that it’s just one more step to another war
that we do not need. We have not been provoked.
They are not a threat to our national security and we
should not be going this. We’ve been doing it to long.
For the last 10, 15 years we are just obsessed with
idea that we go to war and try to solve all the
problems of the world at the same time it is
bankrupting us. I strongly urge a no vote on this



If Paul were elected President and Israel was destroyed by Iran
there would be no country for American Jews to seek asylum in.
President Paul would whip up Jew hatred in America with
conspiracy theories and racism. He would eviscerate or destroy all
anti-terrorist laws and let the enemies of America regroup overseas.
There would be a devastating chemical, biological or radiological
attack which he would have his FBI Director David Duke and CIA
Director Michael Scheuer blame on the remnants of the Mossad or
on the American Jews. A State of War or State of National
Emergency could be declared by President Paul and Jews could be
ordered sent to concentration camps. There is precedent for this:
Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7,
1941, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, which
permitted the military to suspend the constitutional safeguards of
American citizens for the sake of national defense. The order set
into motion the exclusion from certain areas, and the evacuation
and mass incarceration of 120,000 persons of Japanese ancestry
living on the West Coast, most of who were U.S. citizens or legal
permanent resident aliens.




Paul is a crypto-Nazi and pretends he is not anti-Israel:

Israel is our close friend. While President Obama’s
demand that Israel make hard concessions in her
border conflicts may very well be in her long-term
interest, only Israel can make that determination on
her own, without pressure from the United States or
coercion by the United Nations. Unlike this President,
I do not believe it is our place to dictate how Israel
runs her affairs. There can only be peace in the
region if those sides work out their differences among
one another. We should respect Israel’s sovereignty
and not try to dictate her policy from Washington.126


The bottom line here is that “respect Israel’s sovereignty” means
Paul wants the US to totally abandon Israel as an ally and not
guarantee its existence as it has done since 1948. Israel is on its
own. In a May 24, 1996 Congress Daily article Paul, stating that
lobbying groups who seek special favors and handouts are evil,

By far the most powerful lobby in Washington of the
bad sort is the Israeli government and that the goal of
the Zionist movement is to stifle criticism.

This does not sound like a friend of Israel to me! On September
7, 2006 in his speech entitled Big-Government Solutions Don’t Work
Paul hinted how the Jews controlled American foreign policy in the
Middle East:

I find it amazing that we in this country seem
determined to completely separate religious
expression and the state, even to the detriment of the
first amendment, yet we can say little about how
Christian and Jewish religious beliefs greatly
influence our policies in the Middle East? It should be
the other way around. Religious expression,
according to the First Amendment, cannot be
regulated anywhere by Congress or the Federal
courts. But deeply held theological beliefs should
never dictate our foreign policy. Being falsely
accused of anti-Semitism and being a supporter of
radical fascism is not an enviable position for any
politician. Most realize it is best to be quiet and
support our Middle East involvement.

Paul has to defend himself against charges of anti-Semitism on
many occasions. This is because he is an anti-Semite. Paul has the
same position on Israel as the Spotlight:


The Spotlight is anti-Zionist, a political position
mandated by Liberty Lobby's Policy Position No. 5,
"Pro American Foreign Policy." This clearly means a
policy of nonintervention in foreign affairs. Liberty
Lobby sees that most of this nation's problems today
result from intervention into foreign wars, none of
which have served US interests. Nonintervention is
the original policy for America, laid down by our
government from the American Revolution to the
Spanish-American War. With two exceptions, our
glorious victories over Grenada and Haiti, every
foreign war has resulted in disaster for this nation
and the other belligerents. This policy means hands-
off Vietnam, Iraq, Kosovo and the Palestinian no-win
mess. It definitely means no more taxpayer's money
for Israel. Liberty Lobby's position on this has been
consistent for 45 years, and is the reason for Israel's
agents, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)
attacking and minimizing Liberty Lobby and the
Spotlight at every opportunity. To attain its
subversive aim of unlimited, perpetual financial gifts
for Israel-the most aggressive nation in the world --
except perhaps for the USA -- the ADL has made a
fetish of putting down Liberty Lobby /The Spotlight.127

More lies are found in an excerpt from The Revolution: A
Manifesto, by Ron Paul:

I see no reason that our friendship with Israel cannot
continue. I favor extending to Israel the same honest
friendship that Jefferson and the Founding Fathers
urged us to offer to all nations. But that also means
no special privileges like foreign aid – a position I



maintain vis-a-vis all other countries as well. That
means I also favor discontinuing foreign aid to
governments that are actual or potential enemies of
Israel, which taken together receive much more
American aid than Israel does. Giving aid to both
sides has understandably made many Israelis and
American Jews conclude that the American
government is hypocritically hedging its bets.128

Paul’s attempt to seem even handed is a smoke screen. The
enemies of Israel don’t need the foreign aid as much as Israel does
because countries like Saudi Arabia and Iraq have funds from oil
revenues. The other recipients of foreign aid like Pakistan and Egypt
face minimal if any military threats. American military aid has always
given Israel military superiority. If it stops there is no guarantee that
Israel can maintain this superiority. Paul is too smart to say, “Let’s
cut off aid to Israel.” Then people would see where he is coming
from. So he says let’s cut off aid to all countries including Israel
which is the largest recipient of it. He has also stated “We should
share intelligence for mutually agreed goals. We should honor our
pledge to refuse any arms sales that would undermine Israel’s
qualitative military edge in the region.”129 What does this last
sentence mean? That America will not sell arms to Israel’s enemies
so the balance of power remains static? What about Israel’s
quantitative edge? And who is going to decide if an arms sale
undermines this? President Ron Paul? The same Ron Paul who
opposed a House resolution condemning terrorism inflicted on




Mr. Farr. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.
Res. 294, condemning the terrorism inflicted on
Israel, expressing solidarity with the Israeli people,
and calling on the Palestinian Authority to take
immediate and effective steps to dismantle the
terrorist infrastructure on the West Bank and Gaza. I
also rise today to express my solidarity with all those
who support the efforts towards peace between
Israelis and Palestinians.

Mr. Paul. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this
measure. Of course we all deplore terrorism and
violence that any innocents are forced to suffer.
There is, sadly, plenty of this in the world today. But
there is more to this resolution than just condemning
the violence in the Middle East. I have a problem with
most resolutions like this because they have the
appearance of taking one side or the other in a
conflict that has nothing to do with the United States.
Our responsibility is to the American people and to
the Constitution, not to adjudicate age-old conflicts
half-way around the world. When we take sides in
these far off conflicts, we serve to antagonize the
people affected and end up no closer to peace than
when we started. This bill makes reference to the
need to have solidarity with Israel. Elsewhere people
say we should have solidarity with the Palestinians
and the Arabs. So, as I have said before when bills
such as this are on the floor, it is sort of a contest:
Should we be pro-Israel or pro-Arab, or anti-Israel or
anti- Arab, and how are we perceived in doing this? It
is pretty important. But I still believe, through all these
bills attempting to intervene in the Middle East, that
there is a third option to this that we so often forget
about. Why can we not be pro-American? What is in


the best interests of the United States? We do not
hear much talk of that, unfortunately. As I keep
saying when votes such as this come to the floor, the
best foreign policy for the United States is non-
interventionism. It is a policy of American interests
first, costs much less money, and is in keeping with a
long American tradition so eloquently described by
our Founders. I hope the peoples of the Middle East
are able to resolve their differences, but because
whether they decide or not is not our business I urge
a no vote on this resolution.130

“Non-interventionism” in this context means that we should take
the side of the Arabs not because it is the morally right thing to do
but because it is in America’s best interests. Paul told Congress:

Mr. Speaker, this resolution [we are voting on] in
several places asserts that the United States is
“strongly committed” to the security of Israel. I find no
provision in the Constitution that allows the United
States Government to confiscate money from its own
citizens and send it overseas for the defense of a
foreign country. Further, this legislation promises that
the United States “remains committed to Israel,
including secure, recognized, and defensible
borders.” So we are pledging to defend Israel’s
borders while we are not even able to control our
own borders. Shouldn’t we be concentrating on
fulfilling our constitutional obligations in our own
country first, before we go crusading around the
world to protect foreign borders? I also must object to
the one-sidedness of this legislation. Like so many
that have come before it, this resolution takes sides



in a conflict that has nothing to do with us. Among
other things, it affirms Israel as a “Jewish state.” Is it
really our business to endorse a state church in a
foreign country? What message does this send from
the United States to Israeli citizens who are not

Paul is consistently on the side of Israel’s enemies when it
comes to his voting record in Congress:

Statement on H Res 34, Recognizing Israel's right to
defend itself against attacks from Gaza, Reaffirming
the United States strong support for Israel, and
supporting the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

Madame Speaker, I strongly oppose H. Res. 34,
which was rushed to the floor with almost no prior
notice and without consideration by the House
Foreign Affairs Committee. The resolution clearly
takes one side in a conflict that has nothing to do with
the United States or US interests. I am concerned
that the weapons currently being used by Israel
against the Palestinians in Gaza are made in
America and paid for by American taxpayers. What
will adopting this resolution do to the perception of
the United States in the Muslim and Arab world?
What kind of blowback might we see from this? What
moral responsibility do we have for the violence in
Israel and Gaza after having provided so much
military support to one side?

Madame Speaker, this resolution will do nothing to
reduce the fighting and bloodshed in the Middle East.
The resolution in fact will lead the US to become



further involved in this conflict, promising “vigorous
support and unwavering commitment to the welfare,
security, and survival of Israel as a Jewish and
democratic state.” Is it really in the interest of the
United States to guarantee the survival of any foreign
country? I believe it would be better to focus on the
security and survival of the United States, the
Constitution of which my colleagues and I swore to
defend just this week at the beginning of the 111th
Congress. I urge my colleagues to reject this

On March 5, 2008 Paul failed to acknowledge the fact that
Hamas sent rockets into Israel from Gaza prior to Israel’s retaliation:

Madam Speaker: I rise in opposition to H. Res. 951.
As one who is consistently against war and violence,
I obviously do not support the firing of rockets
indiscriminately into civilian populations. I believe it is
appalling that Palestinians are firing rockets that
harm innocent Israelis, just as I believe it is appalling
that Israel fires missiles into Palestinian areas where
children and other non-combatants are killed and

Paul was interviewed by Iranian television about the Israeli
retaliation against the Islamists of Gaza:

It’s our money and it’s our weapons. But I think we
encouraged it. Certainly the president has said




nothing to diminish it. As a matter of fact he justifies it
on moral grounds…without even mentioning the
tragedy of Gaza, you know the real problems that are
there. To me I look at it like a concentration camp.
People are making homemade bombs – like they’re
the aggressors?134

In others word if Gaza looks like a concentration camp then that
makes the Israelis Nazis. No one is being sent to gas chambers in
Gaza. Paul tends to use the word “concentration camp” and Nazi in
a way that waters-down its true meaning. For example he told the
House “Now we have what I call the ‘Nazification’ of the financial
system, not only in America but worldwide. I don’t use that term
lightly. As a matter of historic fact, the civil forfeiture laws in this
country mirror in many major respects the Nazi forfeiture laws that
were used to confiscate the property of the Jews.” Due process still
exists in America. Ron Paul had this to during the same interview for
Iranian TV:

I think if we weren’t in the Middle East there’d be a
much greeted motivation for Israel to deal with all the
people and maybe the Arab League. Maybe they
would be talking to the Arab League every single day
and work out problems. But they don’t do that. They
don’t have the motivation because they know we’ll
back them up. No matter what happens over there,
Israel knows and our government knows, Republican
or Democrat that we’ll do whatever is necessary to
bailout Israel.

If Israel has a problem they have to deal with it. I
don’t think it should be any of our business. It’s just



that it’s our business and we will be blamed because
we support Israel blindly so. And we give them the
money and we give them the weapons. …

If I personally favor one side or the other side then
it’s really pretty academic because politically I don’t
want to be involved. If I wanna say well, you know, I
really think the Palestinians have been ripped off and
therefore all the blame is on Israel, then I’ve sorta
stepped in a little bit more than I want to. I can have a
personal opinion but politically my position is that
America would be much better off if we just minded
our own business.135

Ron Paul wants to weaken Israel so it has to go begging for
mercy to the Arab League. Ron Paul admits is keeping his true
opinions about Israel to himself as he knows it would be a political
disaster if he expressed them openly. Paul’s ex-confident Eric
Rittberg reported,

Paul is however, most certainly Anti-Israel and
Anti-Israeli in general. He wishes the Israeli state did
not exist at all. He expressed this to me numerous
times in our private conversations. His view is that
Israel is more trouble than it is worth, specifically to
the America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians,
and supports their calls for the abolishment of the
Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the




In Liberty Defined Paul claims that the Jews would have trickled
into to Israel a little at a time and would have been welcomed with
open arms by the Muslims and everything would have been ginger-
peachy for the Holocaust survivors but that bad old U.N. messed
things up by voting for the establishment of the Jewish State:

From the 1890s until 1948, when Israel became a
sovereign nation carved out of Palestine, immigration
was mostly voluntary, gradual, and accomplished
with due respect for existing land titles. Zionism,
during the first forty years of this movement, was not
about taking land by force nor was it about militarism,
A continual peaceful transformation would probably
have occurred except for the political actions after
World War II in which the United Nations turned a
local and demographic issue into an international and
highly politicized one.

Historian Juan Cole has pointed out that Jerusalem
(Palestine), through the many centuries, was under
Jewish rule for only about 170 years. In other words,
there are many competing claims for the same land,
and it is impossible to decide between them. Dozens
of other regimes occupied the land for much longer
periods of time. For instance, Muslims ruled
Jerusalem for 1,191 years.137

What Paul is saying is that the Jewish people have no real claim
to the land of Israel. He quotes Juan Cole, a well-known professor
at the University of Michigan who believes Israel’s Likud Party is



comprised of fascist Jews. Cole has made a career out of attacking

Ron Paul sides with the Islamic world against America and
blames anti-Americanism on American and Israeli foreign policy. He
also blames the British, a favorite target of Nazis due Britain’s role in
defeating Adolf Hitler. Paul:

The West has been at war with the Muslim world for
over a thousand years. In this century, the British led
the charge prior to World War II. Since that time it
has been the United States. Although the British
remain close allies of ours in intimidating the Muslim
world, it is the military strength of the United States
that assumes the burden of responsibility for the
policy. It is justified by claiming a right and need to
protect “our” oil. The fear I have is that our policies,
along with those of Britain, the UN, and NATO since
World War II, inspired and have now awakened a
long forgotten sleeping giant that of Islamic

So America and its allies are to blame for the rise of Islam, a
religion and political system Paul sees as a potential ally against
Israel and the Jews. That is why Ron Paul supported the
construction of a mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero:

Is the controversy over building a mosque near
ground zero a grand distraction or a grand

Or is it once again grandiose demagoguery? It has
been said, “Nero fiddled while Rome burned.” Are we
not overly preoccupied with this controversy, now



being used in various ways by grandstanding
politicians? It looks to me like the politicians are
fiddling while the economy burns. The debate should
have provided the conservative defenders of property
rights with a perfect example of how the right to own
property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of
assembly and religion by supporting the building of
the mosque. Instead, we hear lip service given to the
property rights position while demanding that the
need to be “sensitive” requires an all-out assault on
the building of a mosque, several blocks from
“ground zero.”

Just think of what might (not) have happened if the
whole issue had been ignored and the national
debate stuck with war, peace, and prosperity. There
certainly would have been a lot less emotionalism on
both sides. The fact that so much attention has been
given the mosque debate, raises the question of just
why and driven by whom?

In my opinion it has come from the neo-conservatives
who demand continual war in the Middle East and
Central Asia and are compelled to constantly justify
it. They never miss a chance to use hatred toward
Muslims to rally support for the ill-conceived
preventative wars. A select quote from soldiers in
Afghanistan and Iraq expressing concern over the
mosque is pure propaganda and an affront to their
bravery and sacrifice.

The claim is that we are in the Middle East to protect
our liberties is misleading. To continue this charade,
millions of Muslims are indicted and we are obligated
to rescue them from their religious and political
leaders. And, we're supposed to believe that abusing

our liberties at home and pursuing unconstitutional
wars overseas will solve our problems.

The nineteen suicide bombers didn't come from Iraq,
Afghanistan, Pakistan or Iran. Fifteen came from our
ally Saudi Arabia, a country that harbors strong
American resentment, yet we invade and occupy Iraq
where no al Qaeda existed prior to 9/11.139

So it is the neo-conservatives (code word for Jews) who
oppose it and not the Christian evangelical clergy and families of
those killed on 9/11. Paul had more to say in favor of the Ground
Zero Mosque:

Many fellow conservatives say they understand the
property rights and 1st Amendment issues and don't
want a legal ban on building the mosque. They just
want everybody to be “sensitive” and force, through
public pressure, cancellation of the mosque
construction. This sentiment seems to confirm that
Islam itself is to be made the issue, and radical
religious Islamic views were the only reasons for
9/11. If it became known that 9/11 resulted in part
from a desire to retaliate against what many Muslims
saw as American aggression and occupation, the
need to demonize Islam would be difficult if not
impossible. There is no doubt that a small portion of
radical, angry Islamists do want to kill us but the
question remains, what exactly motivates this
hatred? If Islam is further discredited by making the
building of the mosque the issue, then the false
justification for our wars in the Middle East will
continue to be acceptable.



The justification to ban the mosque is no more
rational than banning a soccer field in the same place
because all the suicide bombers loved to play soccer.
Conservatives are once again, unfortunately, failing
to defend private property rights, a policy we claim to
cherish. In addition conservatives missed a chance to
challenge the hypocrisy of the left which now claims
they defend property rights of Muslims, yet rarely if
ever, the property rights of American private

Defending the controversial use of property should
be no more difficult than defending the 1st
Amendment principle of defending controversial
speech. But many conservatives and liberals do not
want to diminish the hatred for Islam — the driving
emotion that keeps us in the wars in the Middle East
and Central Asia.

It is repeatedly said that 64% of the people, after
listening to the political demagogues, don't want the
mosque to be built. What would we do if 75% of the
people insist that no more Catholic churches be built
in New York City? The point being is that majorities
can become oppressors of minority rights as well as
individual dictators. Statistics of support is irrelevant
when it comes to the purpose of government in a free
society — protecting liberty.

The outcry over the building of the mosque, near
ground zero, implies that Islam alone was
responsible for the 9/11 attacks. According to those
who are condemning the building of the mosque, the
nineteen suicide terrorists on 9/11 spoke for all
Muslims. This is like blaming all Christians for the
wars of aggression and occupation because some

Christians supported neo-conservatives aggressive

The House Speaker is now treading on a slippery
slope by demanding an investigation to find out just
who is funding the mosque — a bold rejection of
property rights, 1st Amendment rights, and the Rule
of Law — in order to look tough against Islam. This is
all about hate and Islamaphobia. We now have an
epidemic of “sunshine patriots” on both the right and
the left who are all for freedom, as long as there's no
controversy and nobody is offended. Political
demagoguery rules when truth and liberty are

Paul’s son, Senator Rand Paul opposed the construction of a
mosque near Ground Zero:

While this is a local matter that will be decided by the
people of New York, I do not support a mosque being
built two blocks from Ground Zero. In my opinion, the
Muslim community would better serve the healing
process by making a donation to the memorial fund
for the victims of September 11th.

Rand Paul is not Ron Paul: Sen. Rand Paul took what very well
could be considered his most pro-Israel stance yet, saying in an
interview that an attack on Israel should be treated as an attack on
the United States. Asked in an interview whether the United States
would stand with Israel and provide it foreign aid if the Jewish state
was attacked by its enemies, Paul went a step further and said such
an attack should be treated as an attack on the U.S. 'Well absolutely
we stand with Israel,' he said in an interview with Breitbart News,



'but what I think we should do is announce to the world – and I think
it is pretty well known --- that any attack on Israel will be treated as
an attack on the United States.'” On the other hand in a speech
before the Heritage Foundation Rand Paul seemed to favor
containment of Iran as opposed to taking out their bomb factories. Is
he going to wait until after Israel is attacked with nuclear weapons
then attack Iran? Rand Paul is a walking contradiction and that
makes him dangerous.

Because Ron Paul sees the Islamists as an ally in the war
against the Jews, he has stated the he opposes religious profiling at
America’s airports. The Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR) the American arm of Hamas, thanked Ron Paul for having
rejected profiling during CNN’s Republican debate, and directed
their ire at another presidential candidate, Rick Santorum. During
the debate, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer noted that Santorum had advocated
profiling in the past. “Just to be precise, is it ethnic profiling, religious
profiling, who would be profiled?” Blitzer asked. “The folks that are
most likely to be committing these crimes,” Santorum replied.
“Obviously Muslims would be someone you’d look at, absolutely.”
“That’s digging our hole for ourselves,” Paul disagreed. “What if they
look like [Oklahoma City bomber] Timothy McVeigh?” This was not
the only issue that Paul and CAIR agreed upon. A CAIR press
release read:

As we have stated repeatedly in the past, the
American Muslim community firmly repudiated Anwar
al-Awlaki’s incitement to violence, which occurred
after he left the United States. While a voice of hate
has been eliminated, we urge our nation’s leaders to
address the constitutional issues raised by the
assassination of American citizens without due
process of law.

Ron Paul stated:


No I don’t think that’s a good way to deal with our
problems. He was born here, Al-Awlaki was born
here, he is an American citizen. He was never tried
or charged for any crimes. No one knows if he killed
anybody. We know he might have been associated
with the underwear bomber. But if the American
people accept this blindly and casually that we now
have an accepted practice of the president
assassinating people who he thinks are bad guys, I
think it’s sad.141

How else could have Paul defended the Imam who inspired so
much violence in the United States including the Fort Hood
massacre of unarmed soldiers by one of Al-Awlaki’s followers? How
many American soldiers would have had to die in an attempt to
bring Al-Awlaki back to the United States?

Paul is in league with Michael Scheuer
another Jew-hater. It wasn’t until 1996
that the FBI recognized the increased
threat to the United States posed by
Osama Bin Laden and created the
Osama Bin Laden Unit to handle al-
Qaeda-related matters. From 1996 to
1999, the Osama Bin Laden tracking unit
was at the Counterterrorist Center. Post-9/11 it was run by Michael
Scheuer. Sheuer attended Canisius College. U.S. News and World
Report ranked Canisius as 22nd among regional schools in its
"North Region." He went on to earn an M.A. from Niagara University
in 1976 and another M.A. from Carleton University in 1982. He also
received a Ph.D. in British Empire-U.S.-Canada-U.K. relations from



the University of Manitoba in 1986. He was never the brightest light
on the Christmas.

Scheuer was an Islamist ideological mole within the CIA and a
truly dangerous enemy of the United States. Scheuer pretended to
go after Osama Bin Laden but was in reality was protecting him. In
order to hide this Sheuer blamed the Clinton Administration for
CIA’s failure to kill Bin Laden, claiming that he had the chance to do
it numerous times but was prevented from doing so by his superiors.
He offered no evidence to back up these claims other than his self
serving statements based on his apparent bona fides while in the
CIA: Scheuer was in charge of the rendition program and was
responsible for numerous kidnappings, imprisonment and torture of
30 lower level Islamists. This researcher believes he carried out
these operations successfully in order to maintain his credibility so
he could protect the big enchilada, Osama Bin Laden. Scheuer
knew that if Bin Laden remained on the loose, he would soon carry
out an operation against the United States that would make the
other jihadist terrorist acts look like greasy kids stuff. Scheuer never
made clandestine contact with Al-Qaeda so the CIA Counter
Intelligence Section or Office of Security had no reason to suspect

In retrospect if Sheuer held the same views while he headed
the Bin Laden Desk that he expressed after he left it, then there is
no other explanation other than that he was an enemy ideological
mole. In his book Imperial Hubris Scheuer called Bin Laden a “great
man” and Bin Laden spoke highly of Scheuer in a video Al Qaeda
released142 and said, "If you want to understand what's going on and
if you would like to get to know some of the reasons for you’re losing
the war against us, then read the book of Michael Scheuer in this
regard." Additionally Scheuer claimed that repressive governments
like Algeria, Egypt and especially Saudi Arabia are responsible for
the resurgence of Islamic jihadist fundamentalism in the Moslem


world and he said that he wanted to see these governments
overthrown. He already got his wish in Egypt which will soon be
transformed into an Islamic dictatorship by the Muslim Brotherhood
and al-Shahab as they have been voted into office.

Scheuer blamed everything on Israel. Even if there was no
Israel these Islamists would still be intent on establishing a
Caliphate and making the entire world Islamic, starting with the
Jews, who Mohammed failed to convert. But Scheuer argues that it
is not religious or cultural differences that have made Islam regard
America as the enemy. It is solely the result of America’s support for
the State of Israel. Scheuer wants the Islamic world to focus its
hatred on Israel rather than the United States. Other CIA and FBI
agents may have screwed up when it came to 9/11 but their failure
was unintentional while Scheuer’s was deliberate! He was
transferred out of the UBL Unit in 1999 and he resigned from the
CIA in 2004.143

After he left the Agency he became an Adjunct Professor of
Security Studies at Georgetown University, and was a regular
contributor to the Jamestown Foundations Terrorism Focus until he
was fired in 2009. In 2009, Scheuer reported that he had lost his
position as a Senior Fellow with the Jamestown Foundation, after
"several major financial donors to Jamestown threatened to
withdraw funding" if he continued in that role. The funding threats
were pursuant to his criticism of Barack Obama's "dancing the Tel
Aviv two-step" in allegedly kowtowing to the Israeli lobby, as well as
Scheuer's disdaining of Obama's selection as Chief of Staff of Rahm
Emmanuel, who he called "a U.S. citizen who during the 1991 Gulf
War left America to serve in Israel's military.” Scheuer has stated,
“Israel is not only an unnecessary and self-made liability for the
United States, it is an untreated and spreading cancer on our

143. Report of the Joint Inquiry into the Terrorist Attacks of September 11,
2001 – by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

domestic politics, foreign policy, and national security.” Scheuer
published two books blaming others for his failure to kidnap or
murder Usama Bin Laden. It was Scheuer who trained the CIA
Station Chief in Khost who let a triple agent wreak havoc on the
CIA. Scheuer stated:

Dr. Paul’s non-interventionist policy will allow
foreigners to work out their political destiny in their
own way and at their own pace; prevent unnecessary
additions to America’s growing list of enemies; and
save countless young lives. Electing anyone but Ron
Paul will further increase the already strong chances
of widespread Islamist-conducted violence inside the
United States.

Ron Paul stated:

The pharmaceutical plant in Sudan was just that, a
pharmaceutical plant, owned by a Muslim
businessman who was standing up to the Islamic
fundamentalists, the same people we pretend to
oppose and use as scapegoats for all our Middle-
Eastern policies. And now we have the controversial
and unconstitutional waging of war in Iraq.144

The only known use of EMPTA is as a precursor to Vx a deadly
nerve gas; it has no uses in pharmaceuticals. It is not made
accidentally as a by-product of legitimate pharmaceutical
manufacturing. A soil sample was taken from the grounds around
the Al-Shifa “Pharmaceutical Plant” in the Sudan and EMPTA was
discovered. According to former CIA Director George Tenet, the CIA
sent a human agent to Al-Shifa who entered the facility grounds,
evaded plant guards, and collected the soil sample from a



designated area within the gates of the plant.145 He said that a U.S.
commercial laboratory analyzed the sample and found a level 2.5
times that necessary to be considered a trace presence of EMPTA.
Tenet said the operative had submitted to repeated polygraph tests
to gain assurance that the informant had carried out the mission as
instructed. But of course Ron Paul has better intelligence than the

Paul continued to defend Islamist terrorists by denying that
jihad is a pillar of Islam.

Robert Pape, author of Dying to Win, explains the
strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Pape has
collected a database of every suicide terrorist attack
between 1980 and 2004, all 462 of them. His
conclusions are enlightening and crucial to our
understanding the true motivation behind the attacks
against Western nations by Islamic terrorists. After
his exhaustive study, Pape comes to some very
important conclusions. I, like many, have assumed
that the driving force behind the suicide attacks was
Islamic fundamentalism. Promise of instant entry into
paradise as a reward for killing infidels seemed to
explain the suicides, a concept that is foreign to our
way of thinking. The world’s expert on suicide
terrorism has convinced me to rethink this simplistic

145. Tim Weiner and Steven Lee Myers “U.S. Notes Gaps in Data about
Drug Plant But Defends Attack; Sudan Envoy Angry” The New York Times,
September 3, 1998. Former Shifa export manager Alamaddin al-Shibli
denied that the soil sample could have been taken from Shifa saying, “the
factory was tiled throughout, and there was asphalt everywhere outside the
buildings. Where could anyone have taken a sample?” See Dahne, “Owner
of Sudanese Factory Comes Under Scrutiny.”


explanation, that terrorism is merely an expression of
religious extremism and resentment of a foreign

University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape argued that
Islam has little to do with suicide bombing. Rather, he suggested,
that suicide bombers, wherever they are in the world, were
motivated much more by tactical goals. He juxtaposed the suicide
terrorism of the (non-Islamic) Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam with
Islamist suicide bombing to demonstrate that a desire to end
occupation is the common factor rather than religion. Therefore, he
suggested that focus upon religion is a distraction and that
policymakers seeking to stop the scourge of suicide attacks should
work instead to address root causes, which he sees as the
presence of troops or interests in disputed or occupied lands. This is
just another way of convincing Americans that if they abandoned
Israel the threat of terrorism would subside. The fact remains that
most suicide bombings since 1980 in the world in general and in the
Middle East in particular are sponsored by Islamist and not secular
terrorist groups. Pape avoids this conclusion by gerrymandering his
data so that he does not need to include the significant numbers of
suicide bombings conducted by Sunnis against Shi‘a in Iraq.

The following is from a speech by Prime Minister Mahathir
Mohammad of Malaysia to the Tenth Islamic Summit Conference
Putrajaya, Malaysia, October 16, 2003:

There is a feeling of hopelessness among the Muslim
countries and their people. They feel that they can do
nothing right. They believe that things can only get
worse. The Muslims will forever be oppressed and
dominated by the Europeans and the Jews. It cannot
be that there is no other way. 1.3 billion Muslims



cannot be defeated by a few million Jews. There
must be a way. And we can only find a way if we stop
to think, to assess our weaknesses and our strength,
to plan, to strategize and then to counter attack. We
are actually very strong. 1.3 billion people cannot be
simply wiped out. The Europeans killed 6 million
Jews out of 12 million. But today the Jews rule this
world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for

The enemy will probably welcome these proposals
and we will conclude that the promoters are working
for the enemy. But think. We are up against a people
who think. They survived 2000 years of pogroms not
by hitting back, but by thinking. They invented and
successfully promoted Socialism, Communism,
human rights and democracy so that persecuting
them would appear to be wrong, so they may enjoy
equal rights with others. With these they have now
gained control of the most powerful countries and
they, this tiny community, have become a world
power. We cannot fight them through brawn alone.
We must use our brains also.

Of late because of their power and their apparent
success they have become arrogant. And arrogant
people, like angry people will make mistakes, will
forget to think.

This is from a speech Paul gave to entitled Congress on
October 28, 2003 entitled Shouldn’t Censor Foreign Leaders:

A careful reading of the prime minister’s speech did
not find any explicit calls for violence. Actually, Dr.
Mahathir called for Muslims around the world to
cease using violence to seek their goals. He stated,

“Is there no other way than to ask our young people
to blow themselves up and kill people and invite the
massacre of more of our own people?” Also, he
advises against “revenge” attacks and urges Muslims
to “win [the] hearts and minds” of non-Muslims
including “Jews...who do not approve of what the
Israelis are doing.” While we may agree or disagree
with the cause that Dr. Mahathir espouses, the fact
that he calls for non-violent means to achieve his
goals is to be commended rather than condemned.
This is not to agree with every aspect of his address
— and certainly not to agree with some of the
ridiculous statements contained therein — but rather
to caution against the kind of blanket condemnation
that this legislation represents. Do we not also agree
with his words that Muslim violence in the Middle
East has been counterproductive? President Bush
himself in May invited Dr. Mahathir to the White
House to, in the president’s words, “publicly thank the
Prime Minister for his strong support in the war
against terror.”147


Ron Paul was sent a copy of this book at his office, Campaign
Committee and PAC. A few weeks later he released a statement
that shocked his constituency. Business insider148 reported that
when asked about Israel moving its capitol from Tel Aviv to
Jerusalem Paul told evangelical leaders:




The real issue here is not what America wants, but
what does Israel want? If Israel wants their capital to
be Jerusalem, then the United States should honor
that. How would we like it if some other nation said
'We decided to recognize New York City as your
capital instead, so we will build our embassy there?’

Paul was reacting to this book and to the
formation of an organization known as JAP –
Jews Against Paul. He is a devious,
duplicitous weasel and he released this
statement so people would think “How could
Paul be a Nazi when he favored a position of
this nature?” A smart move on Paul’s part designed to neutralize
any effect this expose might have. Throughout this expose I never
once do I say that Ron Paul is dumb, however I do say that his
followers who don’t pick up on the dog whistle language and
actually believe this man stands for liberty are dumb brainwashed
zombies. As for his overt and covert Nazi followers, the only good
Nazi is a dead Nazi.





We need no more Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act!
No more Violent Radicalization & Homegrown Terrorism Prevention
No more torture!
No more Military Commissions Act!
No more secret prisons and extraordinary rendition!
No more abuse of habeas corpus!
No more PATRIOT Acts!
What we need is more government transparency and more privacy
for the individual! (Ron Paul March 13, 2008)

Paul wrote this in his Texas Straight Talk Newsletter:

Some, even conservatives, have offered the example
of President Franklin Roosevelt's use of a military
court to try a group of Nazi saboteurs during World
War II. It is curious to see FDR as a model for


conservatives, but nevertheless we were in a
declared war and those captured were agents of a
country with which we were in an active state of war.
We are not currently in a state of war, despite what
pundits might claim.149

For Ron Paul the war between America and Islamist terrorists
does not exist so it is no surprise that he was one of the three
Republican members of Congress who voted against the PATRIOT

When the PATRIOT Act was passed, it was in the
passions following 9/11, and that bill should have
never been passed. It was brought up carelessly,
casually, in a rapid manner. The bill that had been
discussed in the Committee on the Judiciary was
removed during the night before we voted. The full
text of this bill was very difficult to find. I am
convinced that very few Members were able to
review this bill before voting. That bill should have
never passed. We certainly should continue to
maintain the sunset provisions. But that is a long way
off, and we should be starting to reform and improve
this particular piece of legislation. This is our first
chance to do so.

Demanding domestic security in times of war invites
carelessness in preserving civil liberties and the right
of privacy. Frequently the people are only too
anxious for their freedoms to be sacrificed on the
altar of authoritarianism thought to be necessary to
remain safe and secure. Nothing would please the
terrorists more than if we willingly give up some of



our cherished liberties while defending ourselves
from their threat. Many of the questionable provisions
in this bill, such as the expanded pen register
authority and the expanded use of roving wiretaps,
are items for which law enforcement has been
lobbying for years. The utility of these items in
catching terrorists is questionable to say the least.
After all, terrorists have demonstrated they are smart
enough not to reveal information about their plans
when they know federal agents could be listening.150

How does Paul know what would please the terrorists more?
Do you think that terrorists are happy about laws that make it more
difficult for them to operate? Paul introduced an amendment to
weaken the “sneak and peek” provision and had 300 members of
Congress vote and was able to eviscerate that clause. “Sneak and
Peak” means to execute search warrants without immediately
informing their targets. Thanks to the PATRIOT Act "Sneak-and-
peek" searches are now easier to get, legal in all jurisdictions, and
the law contains no practical limit on how long authorities can delay
notifying the subject of a search. But contrary to the impression left
by Ron Paul, they aren't new: some federal courts allowed them
prior to the USA PATRIOT Act. Paul:

The irony is that PATRIOT Act-type regulations were
all proposed before 9-11, and are now becoming a
costly burden to American businesses. I’m getting
more calls every day from constituents who are being
harassed by government bureaucrats for “infractions”
of all kinds totally unrelated to national security. This
immeasurable cost from the stepped-up activity of



government bureaucrats will further burden our
economy as it slips toward recession — and do little
to enhance homeland security.151

Paul was just following the anti-terrorist legislation Nazi Party
line as put forth by Willis Carto:

The SPOTLIGHT March 27, 1995


There's a move on in Congress to further erode
Constitutional rights and protections in the name of
"anti-terrorism." Under the guise of combating
terrorism, a bill has been introduced in both the
House and Senate that presents further
infringements on the rights of Americans as
guaranteed by the Constitution. Officially called the
Omnibus Counter-Terrorism Act of 1995, the Senate
version of the bill, S. 390, has been introduced by
Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.) and Sen. Arlen Specter
(R.-Pa.). The House version, H.R. 896, has been
introduced by Rep. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). The
bill, which was initiated by the FBI, appears to have
bipartisan support, which could expedite action to get
it to the floor of both houses of Congress for a vote.
While it is a federal crime under current law for
Americans to contribute funds for terrorist actions
anywhere in the world, the new act would broaden
such crime to a point where it would even be unlawful
to donate money for peaceful activities, including
contributions to the operation of a hospital, to a group



that has also been accused of committing "terrorist

Under a provision of the bill the president has the
power to designate any group as sponsoring
terrorism, which would than make it a crime to donate
money to the group for even lawful - even
humanitarian - objectives. The act would impose guilt
by association. Permanent resident aliens who
support a group listed by the president as having
conducted a terrorist act could be classified as "alien
terrorists" and be subject to deportation. Special
courts would be convened, before which the
government could appear and show probable cause
that an alien has supported terrorism by simply being
associated in some obscure manner with either a
group listed as terrorist or any of its members. The
court could then order deportation based on secret
evidence that would not even be made available to
the defendant's attorney. The act could provide a
general charter for the FBI and other federal
agencies, including the military, to investigate political
groups and causes at will. It is a wide ranging
federalization of different kinds of actions applying to
both citizens and non-citizens. It would allow up to
10-year sentences for citizens who are found guilty
by association and deportation of resident aliens.
While many provisions of the act could ultimately be
found unconstitutional after years of litigation, the
damage could be enormous to the Constitution in the
meantime. The First Amendment, guaranteeing
freedom of speech and of the press, and the
presumption of innocence until proven guilty and the
right to bail, are deemed most at risk.


It seems as if Paul is defending freedom of resident aliens
against the power of an evil dictatorship doesn’t it? How else could
he phrase it? “I feel that resident alien terrorists deserve more rights
so they can get the job done? They deserve freedom! That is,
freedom from FBI scrutiny.” Freedom? If America would have sided
with the Nazi during World War II as Paul wished, the Gestapo, the
greatest abusers of individual freedom to ever crawl out from under
a rock on the planet earth, would have replaced the FBI. The Nazi
secret police tortured and terrorized Jews, gays, Communists and
all who opposed them. They sent people to death camps without
due process of law and habeas corpus. Paul doesn’t care about
freedom. Paul wants to hamstring the FBI, CIA and NSA by not
passing any new anti-terrorist laws and repealing the laws that have
prevented Islamists from launching another devastating attack like
9/11. Why would Paul want to see Americans dead? Paul knows
that Jews and Israelis would be the prime targets of Islamic
terrorists. New York City is where they are most likely to strike. If
non-Jews were hurt Paul would only consider it collateral damage.
And there are other advantages to be gained by Nazis from a
terrorist strike: If a devastating terrorist attack occurs in America
Paul and his followers could always blame it on “an Israeli false flag
operation” or one perpetrated by the US Government to pass more
anti-terrorist legislation or bring us to war. You think this is
farfetched? This is from a Ron Paul newsletter:

The Middle East, in the last forty years, has soaked
up billions of dollars in the name of American security
and peace. The more we give Israel, the more we
must give their Arab enemies. The height of this folly
was vividly and tragically dramatized on October 23,
1981, with the killing of the 241 Marines in Beirut
when their barracks were destroyed by radical
Moslems. The terrorists probably were aided by Iran
and supplied with explosives sold to them by Israel,


originating from the United States and paid for by
American taxpayers.

Paul claimed that his votes are in line with the wishes to the
founding fathers. Would the founding fathers characterize the
American Government as a bunch of psychopaths willing to murder
members of their own armed forces in Beirut by indirectly supplying
them with explosives? This propaganda is designed to put people in
a frame of mind where any terrorist attack can be blamed on
anybody despite the absence of facts. It is part of a hidden agenda
to allow a terrorist incident or incidents to occur here and then
blame them on America’s relationship with Israel or on the Mossad
without any supporting evidence.

What all this boils down to is that Paul regards the Federal
Government as ZOG – the Zionist Occupational Government and
wants to limit its power then destroy it by hamstringing or dissolving
the FBI, CIA etc. He hopes to do this by promulgating the idea that it
is not worth giving up certain civil liberties in exchange for keeping
Islamic terrorism out of the United States. He is interested in civil
liberties only to security strip America because he wants to
empower Jew-hating Islamic terrorists so they can strike America
again and drive a wedge between Israel and the war-weary United


Paul believes in all sorts of screwball conspiracy theories such
as the military is involved in a conspiracy against America as is the
CIA. In a March 2009 interview, Paul entertained the bogus
conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’s claim that NORTHCOM, the U.S.
military’s combatant command for North America, is “taking over”
the country. “The average member of Congress probably isn’t a


participant in the grand conspiracy,”152 Paul reassured the fevered
host, essentially acknowledging that such a conspiracy exists. “We
need to take out the CIA.” In a January 2010 speech, Paul
announced, “There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIA
coup” against the American government. “They’re in businesses, in
drug businesses,” the congressman added.153 Eric Rittberg wrote
that that Paul is a 9/11 conspiracy theorist:

He engaged in conspiracy theories including perhaps
the attacks were coordinated with the CIA, and that
the Bush administration might have known about the
attacks ahead of time. He expressed no sympathies
whatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and pretty
much forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort of
memorial expressions, or openly asserting pro-
military statements in support of the Bush

Ron Paul has repeatedly denied that he believes in 9/11
conspiracy theories, but in an interview in October 2011, he was
asked why he wouldn’t talk about the “truth” behind 9/11. He
responded that he “just can’t handle the controversy.”

A group called Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth asked Paul
whether he believed the official investigation into the September 11th
attacks was credible. “I never automatically trust anything the
government does when they do an investigation,” Paul replied,
“because too often I think there’s an area that the government
covered up, whether it’s the Kennedy assassination or whatever.”




Ahmadinejad is the world’s most infamous 9/11 revisionist. In
his September 22, 2011 UN Speech last year he stated,

When the need to form a fact-finding team to
undertake a thorough investigation concerning the
hidden elements involved in September 11 incident
was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all
independent governments and nations as well as by
the majority in the United States, my country and
myself came under pressure and threat by the
government of the United States. Instead of
assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main
perpetrator and threw his body into the sea. Would it
not have been reasonable to bring to justice and
openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the
incident in order to identify the elements behind the
safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack
the twin world trade towers?

Very interesting: if Osama Bin Laden had been brought to
justice in the United States he might have revealed that he was in
league with the United States or the Israelis. This makes no sense
and is the ranting of a madman who could soon possess nuclear
weapons. On August 7, 2010 he stated:

No Jews were killed in the World Trade Center,
because one day earlier they were told not to go to
their workplace. They announced that 3,000 people
were killed in this incident, but there were no reports
that reveal their names. Maybe you saw that, but I
did not. What was the story of September 11? During
five to six days, and with the aid of the media, they
created and prepared public opinion so that everyone
considered an attack on Afghanistan and Iraq as
(their) right.


Revisionism concerning World Trade Center bombings is
nothing new for Ron Paul. Shortly after the Brooklyn-Jersey City cell
of Gamma Al Islamiyya perpetrated the first World Trade Center
bombing this appeared in the Ron Paul Survival Newsletter.

The New York Bombing

It was only a few days after the World Trade Center
bombing before Mohammed A. Salameh was
arrested. Is he guilty? Who knows? Some people
think this is a frame-up by anti-Arab interests. Recall
that shortly after the Kennedy assassination, Lee
Harvey Oswald was apprehended and accusations
were made. We’re still sorting that one out. From my
point of view, it’s hard to believe the perpetrators
could be as stupid as the authorities maintain.

We now know what one homemade bomb can do to
a large city – one billion dollars of damage. Whether
it was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish
friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by
the Islamic fundamentalists, matters little. The cities
have become centers of violence, whether through
the daily and routine terrorism of crime, political
bomb terrorism, or the terrorism of mob behavior as
in Los Angeles.

The leader of the Ron Paul Super PAC, its founder, chairman
and treasurer, is Gary Franchi, a promoter of 9/11 revisionist
conspiracy theories. As with many other so-called "independent"
Super PACs, which can receive unlimited donations outside the
normal rules of campaign finance, the pro-Paul group is operated by
people with close ties to the candidate. The group's advisory board
members include Penny Langford Freeman, Paul's political director
from 1998 to 2007, and Joe Becker, chief legal counsel for Ron Paul


Franchi has supported the 9/11 Truth Movement, which
supports the idea that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,
were an inside job to create a pretext for a reduction in American
liberty with the World Trade Center brought down by a planned U.S.
controlled internal demolition, instead of terrorist-controlled
airplanes. Franchi founded the Lone Lantern Society (a reference to
Paul Revere indicating that foreign enemies are on American soil).
The group supports "the birth of freedom and the death of the New
World Order," a secretive elite that is supposedly trying to set up a
world government. Lone Lantern has held street demonstrations on
the 11th of every month in Chicago and elsewhere, demanding an
investigation of 9/11. In New Hampshire in 2008, a video shows
Franchi asking Tom Ridge, the former secretary of Homeland
Security, who was campaigning for Senator John McCain, whether
Ridge would support an investigation of the "controlled demolition"
of the World Trade Center. Ridge was having none of it, saying, "I
just don't buy into that. That's a conspiracy theory that has no basis
in fact. It's almost out of the Twilight Zone."

According to a 2010 report by the Southern Poverty Law
Center, "Gary Franchi is one of the leading promoters of a resurgent
Patriot conspiracy theory that alleges the government is creating
concentration camps for U.S. citizens." In 2009 he co-wrote and co-
produced the video Camp FEMA: American Lockdown, which
claims that the Federal Emergency Management Agency is creating
concentration camps on air bases and in vacant buildings to house
political dissenters when the federal government proclaims martial
law. "Your church may have already signed a deal with the devil,"
reads promotional material for the film. The film questions whether
Census data will be used to round up Americans. Clips from
Franchi's film on YouTube show Hitler youth marching while the
narrator ominously describes President Obama's plans to expand
AmeriCorps and the USA Freedom Corps, the volunteer initiative
launched by the Bush administration after 9/11.


In a videotaped interview with delusionary
conspiracy talk show host Alex Jones, Franchi
explained that at 17 he began to read about
"the committee of 300, the Club of Rome, the
Council of Foreign Relations," and other groups
of the New World Order. He said his parents,
thinking he was mentally ill, had him heavily
medicated for 10 years. But he continued his
reading, particularly about the implantation of RFID microchips by
government, and formed the Lone Lantern Society to tell people that
"the enemies are here." "It's the truth, it's the message, that's
piercing the darkness," Franchi told Jones. "Anything that's done in
darkness, anything that is hidden in secret will be revealed. It's
having an impact. People are waking up by the millions, Alex, by the
millions! The New World Order does not stand a chance."154

This is from Ahmadinejad’s UN Speech 2011 to the United Nations:

Who used the mysterious September 11th incident as
a pretext to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, killing,
injuring, and displacing millions in two countries with
the ultimate goal of bringing into its domination the
Middle East and its oil resources? By using their
imperialistic media network which is under the
influence of colonialism they threaten anyone who
questions the Holocaust and the September 11th
event with sanctions and military action. Last year,
when the need to form a fact-finding team to
undertake a thorough investigation concerning the
hidden elements involved in September 11th incident
was brought up; an idea also endorsed by all



independent governments and nations as well as by
the majority in the United States, my country and
myself came under pressure and threat by the
government of the United States. Instead of
assigning a fact-finding team, they killed the main
perpetrator and threw his body into the sea. Would it
not have been reasonable to bring to justice and
openly bring to trial the main perpetrator of the
incident in order to identify the elements behind the
safe space provided for the invading aircraft to attack
the twin world trade towers? Why should it not have
been allowed to bring him to trial to help recognize
those who launched terrorist groups and brought
wars and other miseries into the region? Is there any
classified information that must be kept secret?

According to the Iranian Hitler the reason his country is
threatened is not because it is trying to develop an atomic bomb to
use to destroy Israel but because he is questioning the Holocaust
and September 11th. Osama Bin Laden was killed so that he would
not "identify the elements behind the safe space provided for the
invading aircraft to attack the twin world trade towers?" Who could
have provided that "safe airspace?" Could it have been the Israelis,
could it have been the Jews or was it Lady Gaga? If this psychopath
gets a-hold of nukes he is crazy enough to use them.

Who nullified the Breton Woods system by printing
trillions of dollars without the backing of gold reserves
or equivalent currency? A move that triggered
inflation worldwide and was intended to prey on the
economic gains of other nations.

This is pure Lyndon LaRouche, the failed Hitler. When you
see the LaRouchoids in the street they have signs saying REVIVE
BRETON WOODS AGREEMENT. The Iranian Hitler got this from
the failed American Hitler.


What is the justification for the presence of hundreds
of US military and intelligence bases in different parts
of the world, including 268 bases in Germany, 124 in
Japan, 87 in South Korea, 83 in Italy, 45 in the United
Kingdom, and 21 in Portugal? Does this mean
anything other than military occupation?

This is pure Ron Paul, the favorite candidate of the Nazis.
The crypto-Nazi that wants cut off all aid to Israel. JDO has been on
to Paul for decades as he was a populist hero in the Nazi
newspaper, The Spotlight. He is a very clever weasel cloaking his
Jew hating in isolationism just as the American Firsters did. More
from the same speech:


A future that will be built when humanity initiates to
trend the path of the divine prophets and the
righteous under the leadership of Imam al-Mahdi, the
Ultimate Savior of mankind and the inheritor to all
divine messengers and leaders and to the pure
generation of our great Prophet. The creation of a
supreme and ideal society with the arrival of a perfect
human being, who is a true and sincere lover of all
human beings, is the guaranteed promise of Allah.
He will lead the freedom and justice lovers
to eradicate tyranny and discrimination, and promote
knowledge, peace, justice freedom and love across
the world. He will present to every single individual all
the beauties of the world and all good things which
bring happiness for humankind.

If the tradition of the Mahdi was authentic, then there would
have been some mention of it in the Qur'an. On the contrary, even
the word mahdi does not appear in that book! The original legend
about the messianic Imam was adopted by the Shi'is from other


religious communities, to which they added their own details until it
reached its present form. Islam needed a messianic figure such as
the other two major religions had so they came up with the story that
an imam disappeared then underwent “a minor occultation”, that is
he came halfway back using Imam’s as cutouts, then he went into a
major occultation which he will remain in until he returns and sets
everything straight - meaning everyone adopts shi'i Islam including
the Sunnis. “Occult” can mean “to hide or become hidden or shut off
from view” but it can also mean “of or characteristic of magical,
mystical, or supernatural arts, phenomena, or influences” often
connected with Devil worship. Now the key word here is magical.
Magic is unconditionally & absolutely haram / prohibited. It is a
gunahane kabira (greater sin) leading to Hell fire. A person who
indulges in magic & does not repent is punishable by Death in an
Islamic society, as it is equivalent to shirk & severely criticized in
many many a hadith

"Keep away from the seven destructive sins!" They
said, "What are they, O Messenger of Allah?" He
answered, "Associating partners with Allah;
practicing sorcery; taking a life, which Allah has
made forbidden except for a just cause (according to
Islamic Law); eating Riba (usury) eating up an
orphan's wealth; fleeing from the battle field at the
time of fighting (with the unbelievers); and accusing
chaste women, who never think of anything that can
touch their chastity and who are good believers, of

So what we have in Shia is a reversion to pre-Islamic times
known as the time of the jinn.

In September 2004 Paul voted against a commemoration of


Mr. Speaker, I am forced to rise in opposition to this
legislation, I do so despite my desire to
commemorate the horrific attacks on September 11,
2001 and again express my sympathy to the families
of the victims. But don’t be fooled by the label. This
legislation is no mere commemoration of the events
of September 11, 2001. Rather, it is page after page
of Congressional self-congratulation. It is page after
page of praise for policies that have made us no
safer from terrorist attack, but that have certainly
made us much less free at home. Does it not strike
anyone else as a bit unseemly for Congress to be
congratulating itself on this solemn occasion? What
this legislation does not do is address some of the
real causes of the hatred that lead others to wish to
harm us. Why should we bother to understand the
motivations of madmen and murderers? It is not to
sympathize with them or their cause. It is to ensure
our self-preservation. Those who oppose us and who
have attacked us have made it very clear: They
oppose our foreign policy of interventionism and
meddling, and they oppose our one-sided approach
to the Middle East. Therefore, mitigating the anger
against us could be as simple as returning to the
foreign policy recommended by our forefathers. We
should not be stationing hundreds of thousands of
our troops in more than 100 foreign countries,
guarding their borders while our own remain open to
terrorist infiltration. We should not be meddling in the
internal affairs of foreign countries, nor should we be
involving ourselves in foreign conflicts that have
nothing to do with the United States. We should not
be sending hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars


overseas to “build nations” and “export democracy” at
the barrel of a gun.155

Paul disguises his Nazism with tirades against totalitarianism
and writes:

The founders wanted to set a high bar for the
government to overcome in order to deprive an
individual of life or liberty. To lower that bar is to
endanger everyone. When the bar is low enough to
include political enemies, our descent into
totalitarianism is virtually assured. The PATRIOT Act,
as bad as its violation against the Fourth Amendment
was, was just one step down the slippery slope. The
recently passed National Defense Authorization Act
continues that slip into tyranny, and in fact,
accelerates it significantly. It is no longer limited to
members of al-Qaeda or the Taliban, but anyone
accused of substantially supporting such groups or
associated forces. How closely associated, and what
constitutes substantial support? What if it was
discovered that someone who committed a terrorist
act was once involved with a charity? Or suppose a
political candidate? Are all donors of that candidate
or supporters of that candidate now suspects and
subject to indefinite detainment? Is that charity now
an associated force?156

155. Congressional Record, V. 150, Pt. 13, July 22, 2004 to September 14,
2004 page 17847



Paul’s agenda is to strengthen any group that hates Jews. Just
like Willis Carto’s Spotlight, Paul wants to let “charitable”
organizations like the Holy Land Foundation, which was convicted of
supporting terrorism, operate freely in America. He wants to see the
American Muslims elect a pro-terrorist candidate. Paul told this to
Congress in November 1999:

Sanctions are one thing, but seizures of bank assets
of any related business to the Taliban government
infuriates and incites the radicals to violence. There
is no evidence that this policy serves the interests of
world peace. It certainly increases the danger to all
Americans as we become the number one target of
terrorists. Conventional war against the United States
is out of the question, but acts of terrorism, whether it
is the shooting down of a civilian airliner or bombing
a New York City building, are almost impossible to
prevent in a reasonably open society.157

Paul was right about bombings of a New York City building
being impossible to prevent in 1999 because there were few anti-
terrorism laws in place. Since laws like the PATRIOT Act were
passed there have been no major terrorist incidents within the
United States. Paul opposed The National Defense Authorization

The Bill of Rights has no exceptions for really bad
people or terrorists or even non-citizens. It is a key
check on government power against any person.
That is not a weakness in our legal system; it is the
very strength of our legal system. The National
Defense Authorization Act attempts to justify

157. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 21, November 17, 1999 to
December 3, 1999 page 30043


abridging the Bill of Rights on the theory that rights
are suspended in a time of war, and the entire United
States is a battlefield in the war on terror. This is a
very dangerous development, indeed. Beware.158

Paul wants to give enemy combatants the same rights as
American citizens giving them a chance to be acquitted in an
American court of law rather than being tried by a military tribunal.

Under the guise of protecting Civil Liberties, Paul wants to
security strip America by protecting those who leak classified
information so that the US will become more vulnerable to terrorist
attacks. Paul:

It has been charged, by self-proclaimed experts, that
Julian Assange, the internet publisher of this
information, has committed a heinous crime
deserving prosecution for treason and execution or
even assassination. But should we not at least ask
how the U.S. government can charge an Australian
citizen with treason for publishing U.S. secret
information that he did not steal?159

Paul wishes to make it easier for terrorists to board airplanes
rather than to protect people’s rights:

The incident of the so-called “underwear bomber” last
Christmas is given as justification for the billions of
dollars the federal government is spending on the
new full-body imaging machines, but a Government
Accountability Office study earlier this year concluded
that had these scanners been in use they may not


have detected the explosive material that was
allegedly brought onto the airplane. Additionally,
there have been recent press reports calling into
question the accuracy and adequacy of these
potentially dangerous machines. My legislation is
simple. It establishes that airport security screeners
are not immune from any US law regarding physical
contact with another person, making images of
another person, or causing physical harm through the
use of radiation-emitting machinery on another
person. It means they are subject to the same laws
as the rest of us.160

Why the so called underwear bomber? Was the underwear
bomber a real person or a figment of the Government’s
imagination? Why explosive material that was allegedly brought
onto the airplane? On March 14, 2008 Paul made this statement
on H.R. 3773 - FISA Amendments Act of 2008:

Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this latest attempt
to undermine our personal liberties and violate the
Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. This bill will
allow the federal government to engage in the bulk
collection of American citizens’ communications. In
effect, it means that any American may have his



electronic communications monitored without a
search warrant.

As such, the bill clearly violates the Fourth
Amendment, which states: “The right of the people to
be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but
upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The assurances in this bill that Americans will not
have their communications monitored without warrant
are unconvincing. The bill merely states that the
government should do its best to avoid monitoring
Americans if possible. We have seen how
meaningless such qualified prohibitions have been as
we recount the abuses over the past several years.

Just today, we read in the news that the federal
government has massively abused its ability to
monitor us by improperly targeting Americans
through the use of “national security letters.”
Apparently some 60 percent of the more than 50,000
national security letters targeted Americans, rather
than foreign terrorists, for surveillance.

This is what happens when we begin down the
slippery slope of giving up our constitutional rights for
the promise of more security. When we come to
accept that the government can spy on us without a
court order we have come to accept tyranny. I urge
my colleagues to reject this and all legislation that


allows Americans to be spied on without a properly
issued warrant.161

FISA wiretaps are authorized by the judiciary in secret to
assure their efficacy. Why would a Nazi get so upset about Fourth
Amendment rights when the Nazis are known for breaking down
people’s doors without a warrant, searching their home and seizing
their possessions? Why is Paul upset about communications being
intercepted? Because he wants to see the terrorists succeed. He
wants to hamstring the FBI, NSA and CIA so the terrorists have a
better chance of success. He is hoping they will hit Jewish targets or
New York City, which has a high percentage of Jews living there.
Paul shares a common goal with the Islamist terrorists – the murder
of every Jew on this planet. It sure seems as if Ron Paul is out to
protect our rights when that is not the object of blocking this
legislation at all. His ultimate goal is a Fifth Reich. Paul commented
on Protect America Act of 2007:

Madame Speaker, I rise in opposition to the
extension of the Protect America Act of 2007
because the underlying legislation violates the US
Constitution. The misnamed Protect America Act
allows the US government to monitor telephone calls
and other electronic communications of American
citizens without a warrant. This clearly violates the
Fourth Amendment, which states:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly



describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be

On January 30, 2008 Paul commented on a bill to extend
the Protect America Act of 2007 for 30 Days:

The Protect America Act sidelines the FISA
Court system and places authority over foreign
surveillance in the director of national intelligence
and the attorney general with little if any oversight.
While proponents of this legislation have argued that
the monitoring of American citizens would still require
a court-issued warrant, the bill only requires that
subjects be "reasonably believed to be outside
the United States." Further, it does not provide for the
Fourth Amendment protection of American citizens if
they happen to be on the other end of the electronic
communication where the subject of surveillance is a
non-citizen overseas.163

Paul wants to protect the rights of terrorists even when they are
overseas along with the rights of terrorists living in America who get
calls from terrorists overseas. Paul wants to see the number of
Islamists increase in America: Remarks on Violent Radicalization &
Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, HR 1955. This was a bill to
establish a commission to study homegrown terrorism. It passed the
House but died in the Senate.

There are many causes for concern in HR 1955. The
legislation specifically singles out the Internet for
“facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based
violence, and the homegrown terrorism process” in




the United States. Such language may well be the
first step toward US government regulation of what
we are allowed to access on the Internet. Are we, for
our own good, to be subjected to the kind of
governmental control of the Internet that we see in
unfree societies? This bill certainly sets us on that
course. (12/5/2007)164

Ron Paul continually takes the sides of the enemies of America,
making excuse after excuse for terrorists. He never mentions that
jihad is one of the pillars of Islam and that even if Israel were wiped
off the face of the map the Islamic Fundamentalists would still hate
America for being a Christian country that does not accept Islam
and Shar’ia Law.

In the Name of Patriotism (Who are the Patriots?) We
fail to realize that the extremists, willing to sacrifice
their own lives to kill their enemies, do so out of a
sense of weakness and desperation over real and
perceived attacks on their way of life, their religion,
their country and their natural resources. Without the
conventional diplomatic or military means to retaliate
against these attacks, and an unwillingness of their
own government to address the issue, they resort to
the desperation tactic of suicide terrorism. Their
anger toward their own governments, which they
believe are co-conspirators with the American
government, is equal to or greater than that directed
toward us. These errors in judgment in understanding
the motive of the enemy and the constant fear that is
generated have brought us to this crisis where our
civil liberties and privacy are being steadily eroded in
the name of preserving national security. We may be



the economic and military giant of the world, but the
effort to stop this war on our liberties here at home in
the name of patriotism, is being lost. (6/6/07)

Fighting Terrorism With Big Government - A
Convenience or Necessity? Fighting terrorism is a
top concern for most Americans. It is understandable,
knowing how vulnerable we now are to an attack by
our enemies. But striking out against the liberties of
all Americans, with the PATRIOT Act, the FBI, or
Guantanamo-type justice will hardly address the
problem. Liberty cannot be enhanced by undermining
liberty! It is never necessary to sacrifice liberty to
preserve it. It’s tempting to sacrifice liberty for safety,
and that is the argument used all too often by the
politicians seeking more power. But even that is not
true. History shows that a strong desire for safety
over liberty usually results in less of both. But that
does not mean we should ignore the past attacks or
the threat of future attacks that our enemies might
unleash. First, fighting terrorism is a cliché. Terrorism
is a technique or a process, and if not properly
defined, the solutions will be hard to find. Terrorism is
more properly defined as an attack by a guerrilla
warrior who picks the time and place of the attack
because he cannot match the enemy with
conventional weapons. With too broad a definition of
terrorism, the temptation will be to relinquish too
much liberty, being fearful that behind every door and
in every suitcase lurks a terrorist-planted bomb.
Narrowing the definition of terrorism and recognizing
why some become enemies is crucial. Understanding
how maximum security is achieved in a free society
is vital. We have been told that the terrorists hate us


for our wealth, our freedom, and our goodness. This
war cannot be won if that belief prevails.165

How much of a better way could anyone find to pitch “Allow
Terrorism to Return to America” to the American people other than
“if you want to be truly free you have to give terrorists some freedom
to do their thing.” Paulbots are programmed to quote Ben Franklin:
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Safety from biological weapons?
Chemical weapons? Radiological weapons? Dirty bombs? Suicide
bombers? None of this existed back then and if Franklin was told of
the casualties of 9/11 he would have been happy to give the
Government the laws it needed to prevent another 9/11.

Ron Paul of Texas in the House of Representatives January 9,
2003: Restoring the Second Amendment. Paul might sound like he
is defending the Second Amendment but his real motivation is to
place weapons in the hands of terrorists, including semi-automatic
weapons that have no sporting value. He also wants to make sure
that neo-Nazis and Rightwing militias have access to weapons that
are easily converted to full-auto.

Speaker, H.R. 3193 repeals several of the more
draconian citywide Washington, DC, gun restrictions
enacted in 1976. I rise to restore the right the
founding fathers saw as the guarantee of every other
right by introducing the Second Amendment
Protection Act. This legislation reverses the steady
erosion of the right to keep and bear arms by
repealing unconstitutional laws that allow power-



hungry federal bureaucrats to restrict the rights of
law-abiding gun owners.

Specifically, my legislation repeals the five-day
waiting period and the "instant" background check,
which enables the federal government to compile a
database of every gun owner in America. My
legislation also repeals the misnamed ban on "semi-
automatic" weapons, which bans entire class of
firearms for no conceivable reason beside the desire
of demagogic politicians to appear tough on crime.
Finally, my bill amends the Gun Control Act of 1968
by deleting the "sporting purposes" test, which allows
the Treasury Secretary to infringe on second
amendment rights by classifying a firearm (handgun,
rifle, and shotgun) as a "destructive device" simply
because the Secretary believes the gun to be "non-

Thomas Jefferson said "The constitutions of most of
our States assert that all power is inherent in the
people; ...that it is their right and duty to be at all
times armed." Jefferson, and all of the Founders,
would be horrified by the proliferation of
unconstitutional legislation that prevents law-abiding
Americans from exercising their right and duty to
keep and bear arms. I hope my colleagues will join
me in upholding the Founders' vision for a free
society by cosponsoring the Second Amendment
Restoration Act.166



The Founding Fathers never had access to anything but muzzle
loaders so how does Paul know how they would react to putting
weapons that can kill scores of people in the hands of today’s
citizens, many of whom are Islamic and many of whom are parts of
a permanent criminal underclass that did not exist back then?
Another reason Ron Paul wants to repeal gun law is so that White
can shoot Black “youth” – a euphemism for “nigger.”

From October, l992:

Carjacking: A Hip-Hop Thing to Do

If you live in a major city, you've probably already
heard about the newest threat to your life and limb,
and your family: carjacking. It is the hip-hop thing to
do among the urban youth who play unsuspecting
whites like pianos. The youth simply walk up to a car
they like, pull a gun, tell the family to get out, steal
their jewelry and wallets, and take the car to wreck.
Such actions have ballooned in the recent months. In
the old days, average people could avoid such youth
by staying out of bad neighborhoods. Empowered by
media, police, and political complicity, however, the
youth now roam everywhere looking for cars to steal
and people to rob. What can you do? More and more
Americans are carrying a gun in the car. An ex-cop I
know advises that if you have to use a gun on a
youth, you should leave the scene immediately,
disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible.
Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you,
but one bought privately (through the classifieds, for
example). I frankly don’t know what to make of such
advice but even in my little town of Lake Jackson,
Texas, I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how
to use a gun in self-defense. For the animals are


Ron Paul November 13, 2002 Oppose The New Homeland
Security Bureaucracy!

Mr. Speaker, when the process of creating a
Department of Homeland Security commenced,
Congress was led to believe that the legislation
would be a simple reorganization aimed at increasing
efficiency, not an attempt to expand federal power.
Fiscally conservative members of Congress were
even told that the bill would be budget neutral! Yet,
when the House of Representatives initially
considered creating a Department of Homeland
Security, the legislative vehicle almost overnight grew
from 32 pages to 282 pages - and the cost had
ballooned to at least $3 billion. Now we are prepared
to vote on a nearly 500-page bill that increases
federal expenditures and raises troubling civil
liberties questions. Adding insult to injury, this bill
was put together late last night and introduced only
this morning. Worst of all, the text of the bill has not
been made readily available to most members,
meaning this Congress is prepared to create a
massive new federal agency without even knowing
the details. This is a dangerous and irresponsible

The Department of Homeland has been able to prevent another
9/11 yet Paul opposed its existence on the grounds that it would be
just another Government bureaucracy. What else could he say? -
that he opposed it because he wanted to see America take another
hit like 9/11? How would Ron Paul deal with terrorism?



July 27, 2007

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. A BILL:

To authorize the President to issue letters of marque
and reprisal with respect to certain acts of air piracy
upon the United States on September 11, 2001, and
other similar acts of war planned for the future.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled, This Act may be cited as the
`Marque and Reprisal Act of 2007'.


The President of the United States is authorized and
requested to commission, under officially issued
letters of marque and reprisal, so many of privately
armed and equipped persons and entities as, in his
judgment, the service may require, with suitable
instructions to the leaders thereof, to employ all
means reasonably necessary to seize outside the
geographic boundaries of the United States and its
territories the person and property of Osama bin
Laden, of any al Qaeda co-conspirator, and of any
conspirator with Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda who
are responsible for the air piratical aggressions and
depredations perpetrated upon the United States of
America on September 11, 2001, and for any
planned future air piratical aggressions and
depredations or other acts of war upon the United
States of America and her people.


No letter of marque and reprisal shall be issued by
the President under this Act without requiring the
posting of a security bond in such amount as the
President shall determine is sufficient to ensure that
the letter be executed according to the terms and
conditions thereof.

Does anyone really believe that a group of mercenaries would
have been capable of effectuating the operation that the Navy Seals
pulled-off when they captured Osama? Why the security bond?
Does Paul think that Osama might sue the United States if the
soldiers-of-fortune violated his rights?

In 1988 at the University of Houston Paul declared “Bring
American troops home, abolish the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and the Central Intelligence Agency and dismantle every other
agency except the Justice and Defense Departments.”167 The
Islamists would love to the FBI dismantled as it continually brings
down domestic American terrorists with sting operations. Paul
wrote, “House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers tells
us of the tremendous benefits of this NSA Big Brother-like program.
He promises us that domestic terrorism plots were thwarted, but he
cannot tell us about them because they are classified. I am a bit
skeptical, however. In April, the New York Times reported that most
of these domestic plots were actually elaborate sting operations
developed and pushed by the FBI. According to the Times report,
“of the 22 most frightening plans for attacks since 9/11 on American
soil, 14 were developed in sting operations.” Even if Chairman
Rogers is right, though, and the program caught someone up to no
good, we have to ask ourselves whether even such a result justifies



trashing the Constitution. Here is what I said on the floor of the
House when the PATRIOT Act was up for renewal back in 2011:

If you want to be perfectly safe from child abuse and
wife beating, the government could put a camera in
every one of our houses and our bedrooms, and
maybe there would be somebody made safer this
way, but what would you be giving up? Perfect
safety is not the purpose of government. What we
want from government is to enforce the law to protect
our liberties.”

Ron Paul wants “imperfect safety” and more terrorist attacks
like the one at the Boston Marathon.

If Paul’s constituents were being investigated for terrorist
activity and ties to terrorists they would have their Congressman
object to anti-terrorist laws so that they either would not be unjustly
accused or so that it would be easier to carry out terrorist attacks.
But if you are a Texan and not involved in terrorism or not being
unjustly accused of it why worry about giving the FBI more
investigatory power? How is it going to affect you? Ron Paul
opposes any program that will increase America’s security: In
December 2012 he stated,

Earlier this month we learned that the Obama
Administration is significantly expanding the number
of covert Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) agents
overseas. From just a few hundred DIA agents
overseas today, the administration intends to
eventually deploy some 1,600 covert agents. The
nature of their work will also shift, away from
intelligence collection and more toward covert
actions. This move signals a major change in how
the administration intends to conduct military and
paramilitary operations overseas. Unfortunately it is


not a shift toward peace, but rather to an even more
deadly and disturbing phase in the “war on terror.” In
2010, I said in a speech that there had been a CIA
coup in this country. The CIA runs the military, the
drone program, and they are in drug trafficking. The
CIA is a secretive government all on its own. With
this new expanded Defense Intelligence Agency
presence overseas it will be even worse. Because
the DIA is operationally under control of the
Pentagon, direct Congressional oversight of the
program will be more difficult. Perhaps this is as
intended. The CIA will be training the DIA in its
facilities to conduct operations overseas. Much of this
will include developing targeting data for the
president’s expanding drone warfare program.




Most American evangelicals are
pre-millennial dispensationalists.
They believe that God has a special
plan for the nation of Israel, which
will play a key role in the end of days
and the return of Christ. A smaller
segment of evangelicals holds to
what’s called reformed or covenant
theology, which, tends to teach that in this day the church is what
Israel was in the Old Testament. In other words, Christians are the
new chosen people. Covenant theologians don’t give Israel any
religious significance and are much further to the right than
mainstream evangelicals. While dispensationalists believe that
Christ will return imminently and establish a biblical reign on earth,
covenant theologians tend to believe its man’s job to create Christ’s
kingdom before he comes back. The most radical faction of
covenant theology is called Christian Reconstructionism, a
movement founded by R. J. Rushdoony that seeks to turn the Book
of Leviticus into law, imposing the death penalty for gay people,
blasphemers, unchaste women, and myriad other sinners.
Reconstructionists adhere to the view expressed by Ron Paul at a
Pastor's Forum at Chuck Baldwin's Pensacola, Florida church that
Christians are the new "chosen people," and the righteous must rule
for 1,000 years before Jesus will return.168



Rushdoony is a racist, sexist, Jew-hating bigot who denies the
Holocaust. In Foundations of Social Order he wrote,

The false witness born during World War II with
respect to Germany is especially notable and
revealing. The charge is repeatedly made that six
million innocent Jews were slain by the Nazis, and
the figure – and even larger figures – is now
entrenched in the history books. Poncins, in
summarizing the studies of the French Socialist, Paul
Rassinier, himself a prisoner in Buchenwald, states:
‘Rassinier reached the conclusion that the number of
Jews who died after deportation is approximately
1,200,000 and this figure, he tells us, has finally been
accepted as valid by the Centre Mondial de
Documentation Juive Contemporaine. Likewise he
notes that Paul Hilberg, in his study of the same
problem, reached a total of 896,292 victims. Very
many of these people died of epidemics; many were
executed. Did the Nazis actually execute many
thousands, tens, or hundred thousands of Jews?
Men to whom such murders were nothing had to
blow up the figure to millions. Did the doctor perform
a number of experiments on living men and women?
A few sterilized women and a few castrated men and
their horrified tears and grief are not enough to stir
the sick and jaded tastes of modern man: make him
guilty of performing 17,000 such operations. The
evils were all too real: even greater is the evil of
bearing false witness concerning them, because that
false witness will produce an even more vicious
reality in the next upheaval. Men are now ‘reconciled’
to a world where millions are murdered, or are said to


be murdered. What will be required in the way of
action and propaganda next time?169

Ron Paul is a favorite politician of Christian
Reconstructionists. Gary North, Rushdoony's son-
in-law and star polemicist of the Reconstructionist
movement was a Paul staffer during the Texas
congressman’s first term and has called him the
“mahatma of self-government.” “The people who I
know who are big Ron Paul guys are old school
Reconstructionists,” says Ron Paul supporter
Brian D. Nolder, the pastor of Christ the Redeemer Church in Pella,
Iowa. Rev. Phillip G. Kayser (see photo above), another prominent
right-wing Reconstructionist Nebraska pastor, endorsed Paul. The
campaign issued a press release citing "the enlightening statements
he makes on how Ron Paul's approach to government is consistent
with Christian beliefs." One of Kayser's "Christian beliefs" was
applying the death penalty for gay male sex.

Ron Paul's has long ties to the Reconstructionist movement,
from which the more broadly accepted dominionist strain in right-
wing evangelical Christianity flows. When Ron Paul exited the GOP
presidential race in 2008 Ron Paul threw his support to Pastor
Chuck Baldwin, who ran on the ballot of the Constitution Party, sort
of the political arm of the Christian Reconstructionists. (Baldwin
parts company with Reconstructionists on his idea of how the end-
times will go down, but is otherwise well-aligned with the
Reconstructionist agenda). Founded in 1992 by Howard Phillips, a
follower of Rushdoony, the Constitution Party offers this in the
preamble to the party platform:

The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore
American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations



and to limit the federal government to its
Constitutional boundaries.170

Ron Paul worked with Howard Phillips in forming a shadow
government to monitor the Carter Administration. Paul was the
shadow Secretary of Labor.171 Howard Phillips, whose conversion to
Christianity was inspired by Rushdoony himself routinely refers to
gays as "sodomites" in his own writings. Rushdoony made the
conversion of Jews his special mission. (Phillips is of Jewish
heritage.) At a 2008 rally convened by Ron Paul in Minneapolis in
the shadow of the Republican National Convention, Howard Phillips
appeared as a keynote speaker. Ron Paul has appeared with
Howard Phillips at Constitution Party events, and served as the
keynote speaker of the 35th anniversary gala of the Conservative
Caucus, another of Howard Phillips' groups.

In the 1940s and 1960s, segregationists Strom Thurmond and
George Wallace won chunks of the electoral vote for their own third
parties. (Wallace's vehicle, the American Independent Party, came
under the Constitution Party tent in 1992.) This is a sample of
Constitution Party thought:

We, the members of the American Constitution Party,
gratefully acknowledge the blessings of the Lord God
as the Creator, Preserver, and Ruler of the universe
and of our nation. We hereby appeal to Him for aid,
comfort, guidance and the protection of His Divine
Providence as we work to restore and preserve this
nation as a government of, by, and for the people.
Our republic is a nation governed by a constitution
rooted in Biblical law and administered by
representatives elected by the people to preserve,


171. The Morning Record and Journal - Feb 25, 1977


protect, and defend it against attacks by all its
enemies, whether from without or within. We affirm
the principles of inherent, unalienable, individual
rights upon which these United States of America
were founded. The sole legitimate function of
government is to secure these rights through the
preservation of domestic tranquility, the maintenance
of a strong national defense, and the promotion of
equal justice for all. The federal government has no
role as an instrument of salvation. Salvation is by the
blood of Christ and faith in Him by God's grace.172

Together with Howard Phillips and John Birch Society president
John McManus, Paul has spun a conspiracy theory about an
imminent threat to U.S. sovereignty under the non-existent North
American Union, which the three contend is a European Union-style
plan already under way, designed to erase America's national
borders and eradicate U.S. currency. Ron Paul's demand for a
return to the gold standard for U.S. currency, as well as his disdain
for the Federal Reserve, align perfectly with the "biblical" monetary
policy positions espoused by Rushdoony in his book entitled
The Institutes.

Members of the Christian Identity Church,
also believe they are the chosen people, and not
the Jews, who they have replaced. This is the
basis of Replacement theology. Christian
Identity's origins can be traced back to the
nineteenth century in Great Britain, where a small
circle of religious thinkers advanced the idea,
known as British-Israelism that modern
Europeans were biologically descended from the ancient Israelites
of the Old Testament, specifically, from the Lost Tribes scattered by



invasions of Hittites, Assyrians and Babylonians. The Lost Tribes
had purportedly made their way to Europe, and from them
descended the modern European nationalities. British-Israelism
increasingly advanced the idea, common in anti-Semitic circles in
the early twentieth century, that most Jews were not really
descendants of ancient Israelites, but were instead descended from
an Asiatic people known as the Khazars, who settled near the Black
Sea during the Middle Ages. European (Ashkenazic) Jews were
thus "false" Israelites who further obscured the fact that it was really
White Europeans who were the "true" Israelites. Every Nazi rag has
a reference to the “Khazar conversion” thanks to Arthur Koestler,
who wrote a book entitled The Thirteenth Tribe. Having lived
through the horrors of World War II Koestler was attempting to show
that Jews were really Aryans, by pointing to the fact that Christians
in Khazikistan had converted to Judaism. So what? They were only
a small portion of the Jewish world population at the time.
Unfortunately Koestler’s desire to purge the Jews of their Middle
Eastern heritage was used by the Nazis to attack Jews. One of the
most influential British-Israel advocates of this and other anti-Jewish
ideas was William J. Cameron, editor of the Dearborn Independent,
the weekly newspaper published by Henry Ford in the 1920s, and
Ford's press adviser until the 1940s.

The key figure in the transformation of British-Israelism into
what was increasingly called "Christian Identity" was Wesley Swift
(1913-1970), a former Methodist minister from Southern California.
In the 1940s, Swift started his own church, later known as the
Church of Jesus Christ Christian. He was active in extreme right-
wing groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, and developed a close
friendship with the nation's most prominent postwar anti-Semite,
Gerald L. K. Smith. Because of the activities of Swift, Christian
Identity increasingly became linked with extreme right-wing

Christian Identity penetrated most of the major Nazi
movements. Thanks to Aryan Nations, many neo-Nazis became

believers. Klan leaders such as Thomas Robb and Louis Beam
adopted the faith, as did some racist skinheads, such as the
Hammerskins. Christian Identity also found a welcome home in
extreme anti-government activism, notably the tax protest
movement, the sovereign citizen movement (descended from
William Potter Gale's Posse Comitatus) and the militia movement.
The resurgence of right-wing extremism in the 1990s following the
Ruby Ridge and Waco standoffs further spread Identity beliefs.173

Willis Carto has apparently become an adherent of Christian
Identity. In an article posted on The Barnes Review website entitled,
"Is Christianity Relevant?," he claimed that the "present day Jews
are not the descendants of the group celebrated in the Old
Testament but as a combination of races in no way connected to it."

In his address to the segregationist John Birch Society's 50th
Anniversary Gala in 2008, Ron Paul spoke in the code he knew
would be understood by Christian Reconstructionists and Christian
Identitists alike, who have long ties to the Birch Society.
Reconstructionists refer to the righteous who reside in a land swept
by evil as "the remnant." (A prominent Christian Reconstructionist
publication is called The Remnant Review). "The remnant holds the
truth together," Paul told the Birchers, "both the religious truth and
the political truth.'" Paul also used the “remnant” dog whistle term in
his speech to his supporters in Maine after he lost the caucus there.

Paul is no fan of Roman Catholicism and in February 2004 he

This war started a long time before 9-11. That attack
was just the most dramatic event of the war so far.
The Arabs have fought Western crusaders for



centuries, and they have not yet forgotten the
European Crusades centuries ago.174

On March 28, 2006 in Making the World Safe for Christianity he

The toughest task is analyzing what we do from their
perspective. We should try harder to place ourselves
in the shoes of those who live in the Arab countries
where our efforts currently are concentrated. We are
outraged by a Muslim country that would even
consider the death penalty for a Christian convert.
But many Muslims see all that we do as a reflection
of western Christianity, which to them includes
Europe and America. They see everything in terms of

In commenting on an immigration bill aimed at keeping Catholic
Mexicans out of the United States, Paul revealed his fondness for
FAIR - Federation for American Immigration Reform – an
organization listed as a hate from by the Southern Poverty Law

There are some elements of this new bill to be
applauded. Measures to require detention of, and
expedited removal of aliens, for example, are a good
step. Also to be applauded is the requirement for an
additional 250 inspectors at U.S. ports of entry each
year from 2007 through 2010, although this is
unfortunately subject to the availability of funds. But


overall this bill is a weak substitute for real
immigration and border reform. As the Federation for
American Immigration Reform (FAIR) says, H.R.
4437 “treats some of the symptoms, it does not, in
fact, do enough to actually cure the illness.”176

At the center of the anti-Mexican immigrant web is the
nonprofit Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the
most important organization fueling the backlash against
immigration. Founded in 1979, FAIR has long been marked by anti-
Latino and anti-Catholic attitudes. It has mixed this bigotry with a
fondness for eugenics, the idea of breeding better humans
discredited by its Nazi associations. It has accepted $1.2 million
from the Pioneer Fund, an infamous foundation. It has employed
officials in key positions who are also members of white supremacist
groups. Recently, it has promoted racist conspiracy theories about
Mexico's secret designs on the American Southwest and an
alternative theory alleging secret plans to merge the United States,
Mexico and Canada. A senior FAIR official sought "advice" from the
leaders of a racist Belgian political party. These are Paul’s thoughts
on immigration:

Here is a road map for real immigration reform. First
we need better enforcement of the laws we’ve got —
which plainly call for illegal immigrants to be arrested
and deported and for our borders to be secure.
These things are already law, but the executive
branch over the past decades has failed to enforce
them. Congress can pass any law it wants, but
unless federal agencies enforce those laws they are



Second we need to eliminate the two main magnets
attracting illegal immigrants to illegally enter the
country, the welfare magnet and the citizenship
magnet. Failure to address these in an immigration
bill raises questions about achieving real results.
That is why I introduced three amendments to this
bill, in the hopes that we can finally do something
about the problem of illegal immigration. I introduced
an amendment to end so-called “birth-right
citizenship,” whereby anyone born on U.S. soil is
automatically an American citizen. I introduced an
amendment to end the practice of providing U.S.
Social Security payments to non-U.S. citizens. And
finally I introduced an amendment to prohibit illegal
aliens from receiving food stamps, student loans, or
other federally-provided assistance. Unfortunately,
none of my amendments were even allowed to reach
the Floor for a vote.177

These ideas go against traditional libertarian thinking. The
Libertarian Party Platform states that Libertarians are prepared to
welcome refugees, and the LP works against discriminatory policies.
It states that a free market requires the free movement of both
capital and labor across borders. Older LP Platform stances were
more pro-open borders. The 2004 Platform called for "the
elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the
Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a
declaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered the
country illegally.” This is where Ron Paul’s libertarian cover would
prove to be a big liability if he applied libertarian ideas consistently.
He would be voted out of office by his Texan constituency. Paul



I voted in favor of the Border Protection, Anti-
terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005
and for the SAFE Port Act of 2006. I continue to
support measures that help secure our borders and
thereby make us less vulnerable to future foreign

What happened to Paul’s steadfast rule about the only true
federal crimes being engaging in counterfeiting, treason, or piracy?
It would have been too much for his constituents to handle had he
voted against this bill. Paul refused to come to the aid of his fellow
Christians who were being slaughtered by Muslims in Dafur.





In Time Magazine 2008 Ron Paul made his nomination
for Person of the Year:

Amid a horrific financial crisis, all we hear are calls
for more of the money-printing, spending and
subsidies that created this mess. So I choose my
great teacher, Ludwig von Mises, champion of the
Austrian School of economics, who taught us how a
central bank like the Fed causes booms and busts
and how to build prosperity through sound money
and economic freedom.

Ludwig Von Mises taught at the Vienna
University from 1913 to 1934, while also serving
as a principal economic adviser to the Fascist
Austrian government during the Austro-
fascist regime of Engelbert Dollfuss. Chancellor
Dollfuss was killed in July 1934, during an
attempt by Austria's Nazis to topple the regime
and seize power for Nazi Germany. Despite
Dollfuss’ death, the attempt failed and Kurt
Schuschnigg succeeded as Chancellor and ruled until the demise of
the regime in 1938. The Austrian state from 1933 to 1938 was not
authoritarian, it was fascist, and the connection between Austrian
pan-German identity and the state’s fascistizing policies in the
media, education and population politics can shed light on the
politics of Von Mises in the 1930s. Austro-fascism was an attempt to
turn Austria into a fascist state similar to Franco’s Spain and
Mussolini’s Italy that failed after the Anschluss, the 1938 Nazi
annexation of Austria. Ludwig Von Mises was a fascist economist
who opposed labor unions and all progressive Austrian economics.
Unemployment grew drastically under the Austrofascist regime to


over 25% between 1932 and 1933. In response, the government
removed unemployment benefits from the national budget.
Additionally, the government created the so-called "Cooperations" of
workers and enterprisers charged with undermining workers'
movements. International trade was restricted and eventually

In 1934 Mises left for Geneva, Switzerland.
This dirt bag who looked like Adolf Hitler knew
that no matter how much he swore allegiance to
fascist doctrine the Nazis would exterminate him
simply because he was a Jew. This brought him
to his senses. In Switzerland he was a professor
at the Graduate Institute of International Studies.
In 1940, he immigrated to New York City. He was
a visiting professor at New York University from 1945 until he retired
in 1969, though he was not salaried by the university due to his
crackpot economic theories. Instead, he earned his living from
funding by laissez faire economists such as Lawrence Fertig.

Had Von Mises not been a Jew he would have been a willing
collaborator with the Nazis. His having to leave his homeland put
him in touch with the true nature of the Nazis and he wrote the
following, which however still evidences his own self hatred:

If the Jews themselves are to blame for the fact that
those whose ideal is perpetual war and bloodshed,
who worship violence and are eager to destroy
freedom, consider them the most dangerous
opponents of their endeavors, it must be because the
Jews are foremost among the champions of freedom,
justice, and peaceful co-operation among nations. If
the Jews have incurred the Nazis' hatred through
their own conduct, it is no doubt because what was
great and noble in the German nation, all the
immortal achievements of Germany's past, were


either accomplished by the Jews or congenial to the
Jewish mind. As the parties seeking to destroy
modern civilization and return to barbarism have put
anti-Semitism at the top of their programs, this
civilization is apparently a creation of the Jews.
Nothing more flattering could be said of an individual
or of a group than that the deadly foes of civilization
have well-founded reasons to persecute them.179

Ron Paul’s close associate, Lew Rockwell, is head of the Von
Mises Institute along with Murray Rothbard a Jew who supported
David Duke:

Well, they finally got David Duke. But he sure scared
the bejesus out of them. It took a massive campaign
of hysteria, of fear and hate, orchestrated by all
wings of the Ruling Elite, from Official right to left,
from President Bush and the official Republican Party
through the New York-Washington-run national
media through the local elites and down to local left-
wing activists. It took a massive scare campaign, not
only invoking the old bogey images of the Klan and
Hitler, but also, more concretely, a virtual threat to
boycott Louisiana, to pull out tourists and
conventions, to lose jobs by businesses leaving the
state. It took a campaign of slander that resorted to
questioning the sincerity of Duke's conversion to
Christianity – even challenging him to name his
"official church."

The reality of the current system is that it constitutes
an unholy alliance of "corporate liberal" Big Business
and media elites, who, through big government, have



privilege and have caused to rise up a parasitic
Underclass, who, among them all, are looting and
oppressing the bulk of the middle and working
classes in America. Therefore, the proper strategy of
libertarians and paleos is a strategy of "right-wing
populism," that is: to expose and denounce this
unholy alliance, and to call for getting this preppie-
underclass-liberal media alliance off the backs of the
rest of us: the middle and working classes.180

Rothbard’s ideas are quite similar to Dukes with the exception of
sending the Blacks back to Africa and gassing American Jews.

A right-wing populist program, then, must concentrate
on dismantling the crucial existing areas of State and
elite rule, and on liberating the average American from
the most flagrant and oppressive features of that rule.
In short:

1. Slash Taxes. All taxes, sales, business, property,
etc., but especially the most oppressive politically
and personally: the income tax. We must work
toward repeal of the income tax and abolition of the

2. Slash Welfare. Get rid of underclass rule by
abolishing the welfare system, or, short of abolition,
severely cutting and restricting it.

3. Abolish Racial or Group Privileges. Abolish
affirmative action, set aside racial quotas, etc., and
point out that the root of such quotas is the entire
"civil rights" structure, which tramples on the property
rights of every American.



4. Take Back the Streets: Crush Criminals. And by
this I mean, of course, not "white collar criminals" or
"inside traders" but violent street criminals – robbers,
muggers, rapists, and murderers. Cops must be
unleashed, and allowed to administer instant
punishment, subject of course to liability when they
are in error.

5. Take Back the Streets: Get Rid of the Bums.
Again: unleash the cops to clear the streets of bums
and vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares?
Hopefully, they will disappear, that is, move from the
ranks of the petted and cosseted bum class to the
ranks of the productive members of society.181

Rothbard, a leading member of the
American Council on Judaism was a Jew
who hated Jews. He said America made a
grave mistake when it entered World War II.
Rothbard blamed many later problems on
the fact that the United States participated
in the war. He tried to justify Nazi Germany
by claiming Hitler’s actions were defensive.
Libertarian Chris Tame witnessed Rothbard
claim the Holocaust was just propaganda



made up to justify WW II after the war. That was the line taken by
Rothbard’s favorite historian182, Harry Elmer Barnes, a prominent
member of the America First Committee who authored Holocaust
denial books published by Noontide Press. As Willis Carto stated,
he publishes the Barnes Review, a Holocaust denying rag named in
honor of Harry Elmer Barnes, in lieu of the Institute for Historical
Review’s magazine.

Rothbard wrote and Rockwell disseminated this:

Now revisionism teaches us that this entire myth, so
prevalent then and even now about Hitler, and about
the Japanese, is a tissue of fallacies from beginning
to end. Every plank in this nightmare evidence is
either completely untrue or not entirely the truth. If
people should learn this intellectual fraud about
Hitler's Germany, then they will begin to ask
questions, and searching questions, about the
current World War III version of the same myth.
Nothing would stop the current headlong flight to war
faster, or more surely cause people to begin to
reason about foreign affairs once again, after a long
orgy of emotion and cliché. The task of revisionism
has been to penetrate beneath these superficialities
and appearances to the stark realities underneath –
realities which show, certainly in this century, the
United States, Great Britain, and France – the three
great "democracies" – to be worse than any other
three countries in fomenting and waging aggressive
war. Realization of this truth would be of incalculable
importance on the current scene.183




Paul is constantly quoting this sick, self-hating Jew. In his Texas
Straight Talk newsletter in July 2012 he wrote, “As Murray Rothbard
put it, "Fractional reserve banks ... create money out of thin air.
Essentially they do it in the same way as counterfeiters.
Counterfeiters, too, create money out of thin air by printing
something masquerading as money or as a warehouse receipt for
money. In this way, they fraudulently extract resources from the
public, from the people who have genuinely earned their money.”
Ron Paul, like Rothbard, demonized the Federal Reverse. Paul
introduced a bill to abolish it:

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to stand up for
working Americans by putting an end to the
manipulation of the money supply which erodes
Americans' standard of living, enlarges big
government, and enriches well-connected elites, by
cosponsoring my legislation to abolish the Federal
Reserve. Madame Speaker, I rise to introduce
legislation to restore financial stability to America's
economy by abolishing the Federal Reserve. Since
the creation of the Federal Reserve, middle and
working-class Americans have been victimized by a
boom-and-bust monetary policy. In addition, most
Americans have suffered a steadily eroding
purchasing power because of the Federal Reserve's
inflationary policies. This represents a real, if hidden,
tax imposed on the American people.184

Same old rightwing nonsense that suggested the Fed was
some sort of a conspiracy to benefit the well-connected elites – the
Jews. The fact that many of its chairmen had been Jews played into
this. Ahmadinejad was also a fan of well-connected elites and on
August 28, 2007 stated,



Zionists are people without any religion. They are
lying about being Jewish because religion means
brotherhood, friendship and respecting other divine
religions. They are an organized minority who have
infiltrated the world. They are not even a 10,000-
strong organization.

Congressman Charles Lindberg Sr. opposed the establishment
of the Federal Reserve:

The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts
want inflation...they can unload the stocks on the
people at high prices during the excitement and then
bring on a panic and buy them back at low
prices...the day of reckoning is only a few years

Where would we be without the Fed in the Ron Paul world of
economics based on the works of a fascist economist named
Ludwig Von Mises? Interest rates would fluctuate wildly. Who would
control interest rates in a Fed-less world? An unfettered free
market? A cabal of Wall Street bankers? Congress? You can see
the problems with these scenarios. There would be more bank
failures: The Fed serves as a last-resort lender for struggling
financial institutions. Without it, we’d almost certainly see more bank
failures, from Main Street to Wall Street. There would be less
lending: Without the support of the Fed and other safeguards, banks
would be far more conservative in their lending. Fewer people would
qualify for mortgages, fewer businesses would be funded, and the
economy would look very different.186 Not only does Paul want to




get rid of the Fed, he wants to abolish the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation:


The purpose of reconciliation is to identify suitable
targets for budget reductions in order to reduce
spending. Therefore, it is quite odd that the Financial
Services Committee would use reconciliation as a
vehicle to consider the Federal Deposit Insurance
Reform Act, as this act could increase the possibility
of future bank failures, and thus increase federal
expenditures. The bill does this by expanding the
federal government's unconstitutional control over
the financial services industry. This bill also raises
taxes on all financial institutions. Therefore, I must
oppose this bill.

I primarily object to the provisions in this legislation
which may increase the premiums assessed on
participating financial institutions. These "premiums,''
which are actually taxes, are the premier sources of
funds for the Deposit Insurance Fund. This fund is
used to bail out banks who experience difficulties
meeting their commitments to their depositors. Thus,
the deposit insurance system transfers liability for
poor management decisions from those who made
the decisions, to their competitors. This system
punishes those financial institutions which follow
sound practices, as they are forced to absorb the
losses of their competitors. This also compounds the
moral hazard problem created whenever government
socializes business losses.

In the event of a severe banking crisis, Congress will
likely transfer funds from the general revenue into the

Deposit Insurance Fund, which could make all
taxpayers liable for the mistakes of a few. Of course,
such a bailout would require separate authorization
from Congress, but can anyone imagine Congress
saying "No'' to banking lobbyists pleading for relief
from the costs of bailing out their weaker

Given his antipathy towards FDIC, and the
ease with which Ron Paul can avoid supporting
this system (by simply withdrawing one's money
from a bank), you'd expect Ron Paul to have no
contact with the FDIC banking system, right?
Wrong. As shown by Ron Paul's 2010 Presidential
Campaign financial disclosure forms Paul not only uses FDIC
protection, but actively maximizes his protection by keeping the
maximum amount of money covered in FDIC in one bank, and then
spreading the rest out to a number of other financial institutions. If
Paul was able to abolish the FDIC a massive bank failure could lead
to another Depression. Paul’s knows this as well as I do but he
wants another Depression so a Nazi can take power and blame the
economic disaster on the Jews. Paul is conversant with the most far
out gold conspiracy theories:

Gold Reserve Transparency Act For far too long, the
United States government has been less than
transparent in releasing information relating to its
gold holdings. Not surprisingly, this secrecy has
given rise to a number of theories about the gold at
Fort Knox and other depositories. Some people
speculate that the gold has been involved in gold
swaps with foreign governments or bullion banks,
others believe that the gold has secretly been



shipped out of Fort Knox and sold, and still others
believe that the bars at Fort Knox are actually gold-
plated tungsten. Historically, the Treasury and Mint
have dismissed these theories, rather than
addressing these concerns with substantive
rebuttals. No one from Congress has been allowed to
view the gold at Fort Knox in nearly 40 years, recent
photographs of the gold holdings seem to be hard to
come by, and the Mint's and Inspector General's
audit statements contain only the bare minimum of

Paul’s financial statements indicate that most of his wealth is in
the form of non-numismatic gold coins and stock in gold mining
companies. With gold at $1700 an ounce Paul must be a very rich
man today.

Another economist favored by Paul is Friedrich A. Hayek.
Hayek was a student of Von Mises and worked under him in the
Austrian government’s economic section. Hayek traced the rise of
Austrian anti-Semitism to the immigration of “visibly different” Jews
from Poland when anti-Semitism in Austria was endemic.

When I grew up in Vienna the established Jewish
families were a generally respected group and all
decent people would frown upon the occasional anti-
Jewish outbursts of a few popular politicians. It was
the sudden influx of large numbers of Galician and
Polish Jews [during World War I] … which in a short



period changed the attitude. They were too visibly
different to be readily absorbed.189

Hayek also claimed that it was “the rise of the violent anti-
Semitism which led to Hitler, not the other way around.” Hayek’s
family might have been secret Jews. He had a second cousin on his
mother’s side who was Jewish and he did not return to Austria after
it was annexed by Germany.

Before the end of World War II, in 1944, Hayek, who was later
to win the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science, startled the
Western world with a book entitled The Road to Serfdom. Despite
the fact that New Deal economics based on the principles of John
Maynard Keynes had rescued America from the Great Depression
and the progressive politics that accompanied it gave birth to Lend
Lease and anti-Nazism before Pearl Harbor Hayek formulated the
crackpot theory that these economic and political ideas were
eventually going to turn America into a Nazi country.

THE AUTHOR has spent about half his adult life in
his native Austria, in close touch with German
thought, and the other half in the United States and
England. In the latter period he has become
increasingly convinced that some of the forces which
destroyed freedom in Germany are also at work here.
The very magnitude of the outrages committed by the
National Socialists has strengthened the assurance
that a totalitarian system cannot happen here. But let
us remember that 15 years ago the possibility of such
a thing happening in Germany would have appeared
just as fantastic not only to nine tenths of the
Germans themselves but also to the most hostile
foreign observer.



There are many features which were then regarded
as "typically German" which are now equally familiar
in America and England, and many symptoms that
point to a further development in the same direction:
the increasing veneration for the state, the fatalistic
acceptance of "inevitable trends," the enthusiasm for
"organization" of everything (we now call it

The character of the danger is, if possible, even less
understood here than it was in Germany. The
supreme tragedy is still not seen that in Germany it
was largely people of good will, who, by their socialist
policies, prepared the way for the forces which stand
for everything they detest. Few recognize that the
rise of fascism and Nazism was not a reaction
against the socialist trends of the preceding period
but a necessary outcome of those tendencies. Yet it
is significant that many of the leaders of these
movements, from Mussolini down (and including
Laval and Quisling) began as socialists and ended as
fascists or Nazis. In the democracies at present,
many who sincerely hate all of Nazism's
manifestations are working for ideals whose
realization would lead straight to the abhorred
tyranny. Most of the people whose views influence
developments are in some measure socialists. They
believe that our economic life should be "consciously
directed," that we should substitute "economic
planning" for the competitive system. Yet is there a
greater tragedy imaginable than that, in our endeavor
consciously to shape our future in accordance with
high ideals, we should in fact unwittingly produce the
very opposite of what we have been striving for?


No less significant is the intellectual outlook of the
rank and file in the communist and fascist
movements in Germany before 1933. The relative
ease with which a young communist could be
converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known,
best of all to the propagandists of the two parties.
The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently
with each other than with other parties simply
because they competed for the same type of mind
and reserved for each other the hatred of the

Hayek came out with these anti-New Deal ideas a year before
the war ended. I believe these ideas were demoralizing to the war
effort as America and the Soviet Union were allies and the
implication here is that there would be no moral difference had we
allied ourselves with the Nazis. In 1947 Hayek started the Mont
Pelerin Society with the help of Tea Party backer Charles C. Koch.

In February 2012 Paul staged his rally near the nation's World
War I museum in Missouri, asserting that the U.S. got off track
about 100 years ago during the era of President Woodrow Wilson,
who led the nation through World War I and unsuccessfully
advocated for the nation's involvement in a forerunner of the United

We've slipped away from a true Republic. Now we're
slipping into a fascist system where it's a combination
of government and big business and authoritarian

190. The Road to Serfdom: Text and Documents By Friedrich August
Hayek, Bruce Caldwell


rule and the suppression of the individual rights of
each and every American citizen.191

This labeling of a liberal economic system as fascist is right
out of Hayek.





Assuming Ron Paul was serious about implementing his social
and political programs what would America be like?


President Ron Paul would not enter into any treaty regarding
global warming and the rise in the temperature of the earth’s surface
would continue. Paul:

There is no convincing scientific evidence that human
release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other
greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the
foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the
Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's
climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific
evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon
dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the
natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.


The environmentalists have given us global warming
hysteria, based on speculative computer models
instead of actual temperature data, to justify a treaty
to impose federal and international taxes, rationing
and prohibitions on all U.S. carbon-based energy
sources. (June 4, 2009)

Above all, we must never forget our contract with the
American people – the Constitution that provides the
sole source of legitimacy of our government. That
Constitution requires that we preserve the basic
human rights of our people – including the right to
freely manufacture, use, and sell energy produced by
any means they devise – including nuclear,
hydrocarbon, solar, wind, or even bicycle generators.

"While it is evident that the human right to produce
and use energy does not extend to activities that
actually endanger the climate of the Earth upon
which we all depend, bogus claims about climate
dangers should not be used as a justification to
further limit the American people's freedom," Paul


President Paul would repeal all environmental legislation. Paul:

On environment, governments don't have a good
reputation for doing a good job protecting the
environment. If you look at the extreme of socialism
or communism, they were poor environmentalists.



Private property owners have a much better record of
taking care of the environment. If you look at the
common ownership of the lands in the West, they're
much more poorly treated than those that are
privately owned. In a free-market system, nobody is
permitted to pollute their neighbor's private property -
- water, air, or land. It is very strict.193

Here is what Paul had to say about Earth Day.

Here are just some of the “achievements” of an
environmental movement that has flourished by
promoting fantastic enviro-scares, sending out
millions of pieces of semi-hysterical direct mail
fundraising letters, peddling junk science, and
making ever-more-collusive legal deals. A failed
Endangered Species Act which, by substituting
“ecosystem” control for species protection incentives,
has caused thousands of landowners to drive off or
exterminate the very species that were supposed to
be protected.

A wetlands protection program that has gone from
controlling real wetlands to regulating buffer zones
around tiny “vernal pools” of spring snow melt, and
even lands that have no water on them at all, but
feature “hydric soils.” An air quality program that
denies permits to dry cleaning plants unless they can
prove that their emissions will not cause 300,001
instead of the normal 300,000 cancer deaths among
1 million people who will live for 70 consecutive years
next door to the plant. A “superfund” bill which has

193. Amanda Little, "An interview with Ron Paul about his presidential
platform on energy and the environment," Grist, 16 Oct. 2007


sucked billions of dollars out of taxpayers to pay
lawyers to pursue “potentially responsible parties”
instead of actually cleaning up toxic waste sites. An
ozone depletion scare whose purported effect —
increasing incidence of dangerous ultraviolet B at
ground level — turned out to be unsupportable by
evidence. Ludicrous requirements imposed on the
nuclear energy industry, such as requiring massive
concrete vaults for the storage of old coveralls and
air filters whose radioactivity level a few feet from the
container is less than the background radiation
produced by ordinary Vermont granite.194

Paul would make America a barren land devoid of animal life.
There would be less wetlands, more pollution, less cleanup of
polluted areas, more cancer through a depletion of the ozone layer
and less stringent rules regarding the disposal of radioactive
material. The younger generation must be desperate to get behind
someone like him who would expose them to higher cancer rates.

President Paul would eliminate the DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY. The Department of Energy (DOE) is a Cabinet level
department of the United States government concerned with the
United States' policies regarding energy and safety in handling
nuclear material. Its responsibilities include the U.S.’s nuclear
weapons program, nuclear reactor production for the United States
Navy, radioactive waste disposal, and domestic energy production.
DOE also sponsors more basic and applied scientific research than
any other US federal agency; most of this is funded through its
system of United States Department of Energy National
Laboratories. Are the States going to take over the nuclear safety
function or will the DOE become part of the Pentagon where it
polices and oversees itself? Is this function going to be privatized?

194. 1999 Ron Paul 31:15


The DOE has kept things relatively safe. Is it really worth the
savings to put America’s nuclear weapons at risk? Ron Paul knows
this so what is his hidden agenda here? Possibly to consolidate the
President’s control over the nuclear arsenal?

Next President Ron Paul would eliminate the DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION. On November 14, 2008 Ron Paul said this in a
New York Times interview:

First, the Constitution does not authorize the
Department of Education, and the founders never
envisioned the federal government dictating those
education policies. Second, it is a huge bureaucracy
that squanders our money. We send billions of
dollars to Washington and get back less than we
sent. The money would be much better off left in
states and local communities rather than being
squandered in Washington. Finally, I think that the
smallest level of government possible best performs
education. Teachers, parents, and local community
leaders should be making decisions about exactly
how our children should be taught, not Washington

The Department of Education has given us the No
Child Left Behind law, massive unfunded mandates,
indoctrination, and in some cases, forced medication
of our children with psychotropic drugs. We should
get rid of all of that and get those choices back in the
hands of the people.


One of the things the Department of Education does is
enforcing Public Law 94-142. Before the enactment of Public Law
94-142, the fate of many individuals with disabilities was likely to be
death. Too many individuals lived in state institutions for persons
with mental retardation or mental illness. In 1967, for example, state
institutions were homes for almost 200,000 persons with significant
disabilities. These restrictive settings provided only minimal food,
clothing, and shelter. Too often, retarded persons were merely
accommodated until they died.

It is the purpose of Public Law 94-142 is to assure
that all handicapped children have available to them,
within the time periods specified in section 612(2) (B)
a free appropriate public education which
emphasizes special education and related services
designed to meet their unique needs, to assure that
the rights of handicapped children and their parents
or guardians are protected, to assist States and
localities to provide for the education of all
handicapped children and to assess and assure the
effectiveness of efforts to educate handicapped

The first people the Nazis killed were retarded people. As part
of Action T4, six death institutes were set up in 1940 and 1941
across the German Reich under the direction of the branches of
the Nazi Party, overseen by a specially-created centre for the

extermination program, established at Tiergartenstrabe 4, Berlin.
These institutes were responsible for gassing 70,000 mentally ill and
mentally retarded patients from psychiatric institutions, old people’s
homes, nursing homes and hospitals.

Additionally, the No Child Left Behind law benefits African-
Americans as do other functions of the Department of Education.195
President Paul would abolish THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING

HUD’s mission is to create strong, sustainable,
inclusive communities and quality affordable homes
for all. HUD is working to strengthen the housing
market to bolster the economy and protect
consumers; meet the need for quality affordable
rental homes: utilize housing as a platform for
improving quality of life; build inclusive and
sustainable communities free from discrimination;
and transform the way HUD does business.

This one is an easy one to figure out how getting rid of HUD fits
into Paul’s hidden agenda. It benefits Blacks who he hates. He
would also get rid of the DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR which

Bureau of Indian Affairs
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Bureau of Reclamation
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
National Park Service
Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
U.S. Geological Survey



Leave all of this responsibility to corrupt State Legislators and
the entire environment will go to hell. It won’t be long until the
National Parks have been sold off then privatized or developed.

President Paul would also abolish the Transportation Security
Administration, leaving security at airports and other transportation
systems up to the private sector.


How would gay people fare in Ron Paul’s America? After Sasha
Baron pretended to come on to Paul, Paul stated, "I was expecting
an interview on Austrian economics. So, that didn't turn out that
way. But, by the time he started pulling his pants down, I, What is
going on here? I ran out of the room. This interview has ended.
When this all gets out, I'm probably going to have to apologize to my
supporters because I think most of them are going to figure out why


in the world didn't I sock this guy in the nose?"196 From the Ron Paul

Mass. Legislature Found Only 99% Crazy

The Massachusetts legislature has just passed a
“civil rights” law to protect gays from discrimination.
Like all civil rights laws, it gives the officially
accredited victims special privileges, but there is one
interesting note. Over the protests of the gay
community, the law excludes from protection anyone
“whose sexual orientation involves minor children as
the sex object.” Now we know what is the next
frontier for “anti-discrimination” laws in Teddy
Kennedy’s home state.

So in Ron Paul’s America gays would be considered precursors
to child molesters. One clue to how President Paul would treat gays
comes from the fact that the Nazis banned homosexual activity as
early as 1935. And in 1936, the Nazi Party established a Central
Office for Combating Abortion and Homosexuality. In 1941 Hitler
ordered the death penalty for any SS and police members found
guilty of homosexual activity. Between 1933 and 1945, the Nazis
arrested roughly 100,000 men as homosexuals. Most were sent to
prison, but between 5,000 and 15,000 ended up in death camps,
where they were forced to wear pink triangles. Most of these men
were murdered. But Ron Paul must maintain his libertarian
credentials so he does a balancing act when it comes to gays. Paul
did not support a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage:

Mr. Speaker, while I oppose federal efforts to
redefine marriage as something other than a union
between one man and one woman, I do not believe a



constitutional amendment is either a necessary or
proper way to defend marriage.

Because of the dangers to liberty and traditional
values posed by the unexpected consequences of
amending the Constitution to strip power from the
states and the people and further empower
Washington, I cannot in good conscience support the
marriage amendment to the United States
Constitution. Instead, I plan to continue working to
enact the Marriage Protection Act and protect each
state’s right not to be forced to recognize a same sex
marriage. (9/30/2004)197

On the other hand, according to the website,
Paul voted against allowing gay adoptions in Washington, D.C.;
supported "Don't Ask, Don't Tell;" and said that the Defense of
Marriage Act was "proper." Paul has also stated that he
thinks marriage should only be between a man and a woman. But
others around him can be more frank. Mike Heath, Paul’s Iowa state
director, is a former board chairman of Americans for Truth about
Homosexuality, which the Southern Poverty Law Center classifies
as a hate group. Had Paul won the Iowa caucuses, it would have
actually been a triumph for a fundamentalist faction that has until
now been considered a fringe even on the Christian right. Eric
Rittberg reported that Ron Paul has AIDSaphobia:



In 1988, Ron had a hardcore Libertarian supporter,
Jim Peron, owner of Laissez Faire Books in San
Francisco. Jim set up a magnificent 3-day campaign
swing for us in the SF Bay Area. Jim was what you
would call very openly Gay. But Ron thought the
world of him. For 3 days we had a great time
trouncing from one campaign event to another with
Jim’s Gay lover. The atmosphere was simply jovial
between the four of us. (As an aside we also met
former Congressman Pete McCloskey during this
campaign trip). We used Jim’s home/office as a
“base.” Ron pulled me aside the first time we went
there, and specifically instructed me to find an
excuse to excuse him to a local fast food restaurant
so that he could use the bathroom. He told me very
clearly, that although he liked Jim, he did not wish to
use his bathroom facilities. I chided him a bit, but he
sternly reacted, as he often did to me, Eric, just do
what I say. Perhaps “sternly” is an understatement.
Ron looked at me directly, and with a very angry look
in his eye, and shouted under his breath: “Just do
what I say NOW.”198



Jim Peron has strong ties to the North American Man Boy Love
Association (NAMBLA) and published a pedophile journal called
Unbound out of his San Francisco bookstore (called free forum
books) which is a pedophile journal. His bookstore in San Francisco
was raided twice by police because of at least one employee’s child
molesting habits and the pedophile literature was confiscated. Peron
hosted NAMBLA meetings at his bookstore and the 1st journal was
written in 1987 before Paul went and hung out with him for three

The second incident involved one or two other
staffers many years later at the BBQ in Surfside
Beach. I was not in direct presence of the incident.
But another top staffer, and I believe one of our
secretaries, was witness to it. This top staffer
adores Ron, but was extremely insulted by his
behavior, I would even say flabbergasted to the
point of considering resigning from his staff over it.

“Bobby,” a well-known and rather flamboyant and
well-liked gay man in Freeport came to the BBQ. Let
me stress Ron likes Bobby personally, and Bobby
was a hardcore campaign supporter. But after his
speech at the Surfside Pavilion Bobby came up to
Ron with his hand extended, and according to my
fellow staffer, Ron literally swatted his hand away.

Some parts of Ron Paul’s newsletter were written from the point
of view of a Doctor interested in quack theories about the AIDS
virus. Paul touted a now discredited theory that AIDS was produced
by the United States Army’s Special Weapons Division located at
Fort Detrick, Maryland:


AIDS: Something Else We Can Thank Government

William C. Douglass, MD, writing in the anti-
government medicine Health Freedom News, gives a
fascinating analysis of AIDS and speculates on its
origin. I’d like to share his research with you:

“There are many viruses that grow in animals, and
many in humans,” he points out, “but most of the
viruses that grow in animals don’t affect humans.”
For example, “the bovine leukemia virus” is “lethal to
cows but not humans.” “The sheep visna virus is also
non-reactive in man. These deadly viruses are
‘retroviruses’ meaning they can change the genetic
composition of cells they enter.”

Dr. Douglass believes that AIDS is a deliberately
engineered hybrid of these two animal viruses
cultured in human tissue, and he blames World
Health Organization experimentation at Ft. Detrick,

Ft. Detrick is one of the centers of biological warfare
research, where federal scientists are engaged in
deliberately manufacturing deadly diseases for World
War III. Could they have produced AIDS? Could the
government have experimented with it in the civilian
population, as it did in the 1950s with the LSD, and
had things get out of control? I don’t know, but these
sure are interesting questions.

“I have always said,” notes Dr. Douglass, “and our
forefathers told us this, that the greatest threat to the
people is always the government. Not foreign
governments, but our own government.”


This conspiracy theory was invented by the
KGB. Operation Infektion was a KGB
disinformation campaign to spread lies that the
United States Army invented HIV/AIDS as part
of a biological weapons research project at Fort
Detrick, Maryland. The Soviet Union used it to
undermine the United States’ credibility, foster
anti-Americanism, isolate America abroad, and
create tensions between host countries and the U.S. over the
presence of American military bases (which were often portrayed as
the cause of AIDS outbreaks in local populations). According to U.S.
State Department analysts, another reason the Soviet Union
"promoted the AIDS disinformation may have been its attempt to
distract international attention away from its own offensive biological
warfare program, which was monitored for decades. The Soviets
developed anthrax, tularemia, plague, cholera and asbotulinum
toxin, enterotoxins and mycotoxins for biological warfare
purposes.”199 More on AIDS from the Paul/Carto newsletters:


The tactics of the homosexual lobby seem to get
more extreme by the day. Recently, a group invaded
Catholic services at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New
York City and proceeded to shriek, sound air horns,
lie down in the aisles, desecrate the Eucharist, toss
condoms, wave sacrilegious drawings of Jesus
Christ, and handcuff themselves to the pews.
Meanwhile, thousands more screamed outside. I’m
not Catholic, but even aside from the violations of
private property involved, I find this morally



The demonstrations were organized by ACT UP: the
Aids Coalition To Unleash Power because the
Catholic Church has lobbied against homosexual
propaganda in the public schools. Victor Mendolia,
spokesman for ACT UP, calls lobbying against such
programs “criminal.” That is the correct description
for his organization, of course.

A well-known Libertarian editor just back from New
York told me: “The ACT-UP slogan, on stickers
plastered all over Manhattan, is ‘Silence = Death.’
But shouldn’t it be ‘Sodomy = Death’?”

Meanwhile, speaking of acting up, my former church,
the Episcopal, has just ordained its first openly gay
priest. “I’m floating on air,” said the Rev. J. Robert
Williams. Among the people attending the ordination
in Newark, New Jersey – conducted by liberal Bishop
John Shelby Spong – were James Skelly, Williams’s
live-in companion.

President Paul would pass a law making membership in gay
organizations a criminal offense and he would do everything in his
power to prevent gays from being ordained as ministers. President
Paul could base this legislation on the alleged contagiousness of

Caring for the AIDS patient

The government tells us that AIDS cannot be
transmitted "casually." The government also tells us
that it should raise our taxes, and risk our sons for
Saudi Arabia. Recently, a non-government physician
writing in Gene Antonio's Healthwatch Report (P. O.
Box 90140-264 Arlington, TX 76004, $25 a year)
gave some excellent advice "To Those Caring for the
AIDS Patient."

1. Wear rubber gloves when handling the clothes,
dishes, etc. of the patient.

2. Use paper plates and cups and burn them

3. Boil all his laundry for at least 15 minutes.
4. Pour a half cup of Clorox in his bath water before
draining it.

5. Always wipe the toilet seat with a soapy paper
towel. Do not put the towel in the toilet, but in a paper
bag to be burned.

6. No kissing, since AIDS can be transmitted by

7. No sexual relations, since condoms are far from

8. Do not allow the patient to eat in a restaurant.

9. Do not allow the patient to drive or operate
machinery due to mental impairment.

How often are these sorts of commonsense
precautions taken? Not often, because they violate
the government propaganda line, and would be
considered a hate crime. But they give us an idea of
how we should actually proceed, instead of having
tax-funded programs to promote the conduct that
causes AIDS.

Another newsletter warned that “the AIDS patient” should not
be allowed to eat in restaurants because “AIDS can be transmitted
by saliva,” a strange claim for a physician to make. Paul told
Congress AIDS in a “politically correct disease” -

Think of what it would mean if we followed this simple
logic and implemented a Federal social program,
similar to the current war on smoking, designed to
reduce the spread of AIDS within the gay community.
Astoundingly, we have done the opposite by making
AIDS a politically correct disease. There was
certainly a different attitude a hundred years ago
regarding those with sexually transmitted diseases
like syphilis compared to the special status given
AIDS victims today.200

According to Paul we have to treat people with AIDS like lepers.
If President Paul acted on these crackpot theories he could have
gays quarantined so that AIDS, which his Surgeon General found to
be highly contagious, could be eradicated. Gays would be granted
“special status” Sonderbehandlung (“special treatment”) which in the
language of the Nazis would mean execution,


You want to get rid of drug crime in this country?
Fine, let's just get rid of all the drug laws. - Ron Paul
(at the 2011 CNN Republican presidential debate).

President Paul would legalize all recreational drugs. Repealing
laws against drugs, however, would require Congressional approval
which would be highly unlikely. What President Paul could do would
be to order his FBI Director not to enforce drug laws and order his
Attorney General not to prosecute violations of these laws. This
would be a violation of the law in itself. He could, however, order his
FBI Director to give these laws less priority. But this has already
taken place. In 1999 there were a total of 28,192 FBI employees:



11,646 agents and 16,546 support staff. In September 2002, 900
new agents were hired. The Counter Terrorism Division was
expanded, adding 14 new “sections” and “units” specializing in
trying to combat terrorism. Five hundred and eighteen agents were
reassigned to counter-Islamist operations from within the agency. Of
them, 400 came from the anti-drug crimes division, 59 were shifted
from white-collar crime divisions and another 59 were transferred
from the violent crime-fighting sections. Indeed, the FBI has
transferred even more agent positions than it originally announced
and has augmented those agents with the short-term assignment of
additional field agents from drug and other law enforcement areas to
work on counterterrorism. Before leaving office former United States
Attorney General John Ashcroft said American law enforcement
agencies have now created a “most wanted list” of 54 drug
organizations that must be toppled here and abroad, and this is
what they will focus on.

After the September 11th attack the number of agents working
narcotics cases dropped 45%, bank fraud cases dropped 31% and
bank robbery investigations dropped 25%. As would be expected,
the number of newly opened drug cases has fallen in relation to the
decline in the number of field agent positions allocated to drug

So, aside from raiding pot dispensaries throughout the country,
the FBI is concentrating on fighting the drug gangs and cartels. If
President Paul took the FBI heat off these criminal organizations
and ordered his Attorney General not to prosecute them under
RICO at the same time drugs were still illegal under State law the
Mexican Cartels would have a field day and over-run this country
turning it into Little Mexico. How can State Governments fight
international or even interstate drug cartels?

The argument which springs from the criticism of a
federalized criminal code and a federal police force is
that states may be less effective than a centralized

federal government in dealing with those who leave
one state jurisdiction for another. Fortunately, the
Constitution provides for the procedural means for
preserving the integrity of state sovereignty over
those issues delegated to it via the tenth amendment.
The privilege and immunities clause as well as full
faith and credit clause allow states to exact
judgments from those who violate their state laws.
The Constitution even allows the federal government
to legislatively preserve the procedural mechanisms
which allow states to enforce their substantive laws
without the federal government imposing its
substantive edicts on the states. Article IV, Section 2,
Clause 2 makes provision for the rendition of
fugitives from one state to another. While not self-
enacting, in 1783 Congress passed an act which did
exactly this. There is, of course, a cost imposed upon
states in working with one another rather than relying
on a national, unified police force. At the same time,
there is a greater cost to state autonomy and
individual liberty from centralization of police

None-the-less Paulbots believe he would make the southern
border safer by advocating an end to the federal War on Drugs.


Paul, who voted against a bill honoring the Drug Enforcement
Administration would stop the DEA from actively pursuing drug
producers, distributors, and purchasers by dissolving it in its entirety
because he believes the DEA is an illegal entity:

201. Congressional Record, V. 152, Pt. 15, September 26, 2006 to
September 28, 2006 Pge 19834


The IRS and the DEA, with powers illegally given
them by the Congress and the courts, have prompted
a flood of seizures and forfeitures in the last several
decades without due process and frequently without
search warrants or probable cause. Victims then are
required to prove themselves innocent to recover the
goods seized.202

The DEA was created with an executive order (much like FEMA
and the EPA). If President Paul wanted to end the federal war on
drugs, he could end the DEA. He would not need permission from
congress to shut it down. Any department that was created with an
executive order can be abolished without congressional approval.
All the President Paul needs to do is sign his name and America will
become lawless Mexico because state law enforcement would be
unable to cope with the Mexican drug cartels that would overrun


Cannabis is not a drug its toxicity is
too low. It is a herb that will get you
about as high as a cup of coffee will.
As far as drugs go there are good
drugs and bad drugs. Hard, toxic
drugs are a dangerous shortcut to
happiness. They cause euphoria,
happiness unwarranted by external
circumstance, however they can kill, they can induce psychopathic
activity and you can get seriously addicted to them and commit
crimes to obtain them. If they were legal a lot of discontented poor
and mentally weak people will turn to them. There would be massive
crack and heroin addiction in the black ghetto community. It is easy

202. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 94


to overdose on heroin so assuming it was legal so there would also
be numerous deaths of African-Americans. This would suit the racist
Ron Paul just fine. That is why Paul wants no drug enforcement on
a federal level and says he would leave it up to the states to decide
which drug should be legalized. What state is going to legalize
heroin? If one state did decide to legalize heroin junkies from the
other states will move there or go there to cop. Can you imagine a
state where the majority of citizens are junkies? Would the state
flower be an opium poppy? So this is really nonsensical and aimed
at people who want to believe anything. Paul made his position on
heroin clear during a presidential debate:

Q: You say that the federal government should stay
out of people's personal habits, including marijuana,
cocaine, even heroin.

A: It's an issue of protecting liberty across the board.
If you have the inconsistency, then you're really not
defending liberty. We want freedom [including] when
it comes to our personal habits.

Q: Are you suggesting that heroin and prostitution
are an exercise of liberty?

A: Yes, in essence, if we leave it to the states. For
over 100 years, they were legal. You're implying if we
legalize heroin tomorrow, everyone's gonna use
heroin. How many people here are going to use
heroin if it were legal? I bet nobody! "Oh yeah, I need
the government to take care of me. I don't want to
use heroin, so I need these laws!"203



Paul was not addressing the Crypts or the Bloods nor a group
of ghetto youth with little opportunity (who wouldn’t admit to wanting
to cop some heroin anyway), he was addressing a group of well off
white people who had come to hear a Presidential debate.

Paul claims he does not believe that heroin is bad drug and has

A hundred years ago, a pharmacist openly
advertised, “Heroin clears the complexion, gives
buoyancy to the mind, regulates the stomach and the
bowels and is, in fact, a perfect guardian of health.”
Obviously this is overstated as a medical panacea,
but it describes what it was like not to have hysterical
busybodies undermine our Constitution and waste
billions of dollars on a drug war serving no useful
purpose. This country needs to wake up! We should
have more confidence in citizens making their own
decisions, and decide once again to repeal federal
prohibition, while permitting regulation by the states

President Paul would give the American people the right to
destroy themselves with something he himself considers “bad stuff.”
This throws some light on the real reason he wants all drugs
legalized – to further mess up the lives of people who use them.
Evidence of this can be found in Paul’s opposition to free needle
exchange and his support of legislation banning it.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this legislation. It
makes no sense to pay somebody, pay for free
needles to do something that is currently illegal. It is



very questionable whether it will do any good. As a
physician, I would have to agree with the opposition
that a clean needle certainly is better than a dirty
needle. I do not think there is a question about that.
But I do believe that there is a message sent that if
we provide free needles to do something that we are
condoning or encouraging it. But there is also a
strong moral as well as an economic argument
against this. What we are talking about here is
lowering costs of risky behavior. We are saying that
we will pay for the needles to perform this risky
behavior. But there is another much larger element
that has not been discussed so far, and that has to
do with the concept that all risky behavior be
socialized; that is, through the medical system, it is
assumed that those who do not participate in risky
behavior must pay for the costs of the risky behavior,
whether it has to do with cigarettes or whether it has
to do with drugs or whether it has to do with any kind
of safety. So, therefore, the argument is that we have
to save money in medical care costs by providing
free needles. But there is another position, and that is
that we might suggest that we do not pay for free
needles and we might even challenge the concept
that we should not be paying people and taking care
of them for risky behavior, whether it is risky sexual
behavior or risky behavior with drugs. I think this is
very clearly the problem, and I do not believe we
should be socializing this behavior because, if we do,
we actually increase it. If we lower the cost of
anything, we increase the incidence of its use. So if
the responsibility does not fall on the individual
performing dangerous behavior, they are more likely
to, and this is just part of it, the idea that we would
give them a free needle. But there is a moral

argument against this as well. Why should people
who do not use drugs or do not participate in
dangerous sexual procedures and activities have to
pay for those who do? And this is really the question,
and there is no correct moral argument for this. And
the economic argument is very powerful. It says that
if we lower the cost, we will increase this behavior.
So this concept has to be dealt with if we are ever to
get to the bottom of this. So, Mr. Speaker, I strongly
support this legislation.205

Paul wants addicts punished for their risky behavior by letting
them get AIDS and Hepatitis. He argues that if the junkies have to
pay for their set of works they might kick junk because it is just too
gosh darn expensive with a family to feed and all. This makes no
sense. The reason he supported this bill was to wreak further havoc
on the Black community.


Paul’s hidden agenda comes more into focus after reading the
newsletter below:



Ron Paul is arguing in favor of crack. He says that crack will not
cause psychosis and that the proof is that Marion Barry, Mayor of
Washington, D.C. used crack when he was in office and continued
to function. Of course Marion Barry did not live in the projects on
welfare nor did he live on the streets. The truth is crack is an
addictive drug that produces numerous psychiatric symptoms,
syndromes, and disorders. The symptoms include agitation,
paranoia, hallucinations, delusions, violence, as well as suicidal and
homicidal thinking. They can be primary to the drug's effect or
secondary to exacerbation of co-morbid psychiatric disorders.
Cocaine use during pregnancy can increase the complications of
pregnancy and affect the fetus directly. These crack heads may also
use other drugs, alcohol, and nicotine, which adversely affect the
pregnancy as well. They have an increased rate of miscarriages and
placenta abruption, in which the placenta separates from the wall of
the uterus and results in stillbirth. There is increasing information
that cocaine may cause birth defects with increased rates in fetal
death rates, malformation, low birth weights, and behavioral
abnormalities. Paul’s hidden agenda here is that Blacks will go
crazy or be stillborn if crack is legalized. Paul is well aware that a
number of ominous trends emerged in the black community in the
mid-1980s due to crack cocaine. Between 1984 and 1994, the


homicide rate for black males aged 14 to 17 more than doubled,
and the homicide rate for black males aged 18 to 24 increased
nearly as much. During this period, the black community also
experienced an increase weapons arrests and the number of
children in foster care. Paul goes on to say the fear of crack is
similar to the unwarranted fear of pot in the 1930’s when one cannot
equate the two.

Paul thought cocaine was pretty cool too!

One hundred years ago, you could buy cocaine in a
drugstore. Most Americans would be tremendously
surprised to realize that for most of our history drugs
were not illegal. The first marijuana law was in 1938.
And they got around that on the constitutional aspect
by just putting a tax on it. So there is a lack of respect
for how we solve our problems, a lack of wisdom on
what we ought to do, and a lack of concern; and this
is my deep concern as a physician, a lack of concern
for seeing people dying and suffering.206

One hundred years ago there were no gangbangers getting
coked up and dropping hammers on each other and on anyone else
in the Black community caught in the crossfire. Come on, we know
from Paul’s newsletters that he is aware of Black crime and the role
drugs play in it. Then Paul expects us to believe that it is his
concern for “seeing people dying and suffering” that motivates him
rather than exactly the opposite.

President Paul would free non-violent federal drug offenders. In
addressing Res. 412 Honoring Men And Women Of The Drug
Enforcement Administration on March 3, 2004 Paul stated:



And then if we look at the prison system, we have
created a monstrosity. Eighty-four percent, according
to one study, 84 percent of all Federal prisoners are
nonviolent drug prisoners. They go in and they come
out violent. We are still talking about a medical
problem. We treat alcoholism as a medical problem,
but anybody who smokes a marijuana cigarette or
sells something, we want to put them in prison. I think
it is time to stop and reevaluate this.207

If you end up in Federal Prison for drugs, it is not just for selling
a bag or two of heroin. There is a myth in this country that U.S.
prisons are filled with non-violent drug users. This assertion is
simply not true. Actually, only 5 percent of inmates in federal prison
on drug charges are incarcerated for drug possession. Most cases
of simple drug possession are simply not prosecuted, unless people
have been arrested repeatedly for using drugs. In 1999, for
example, only 2.5 percent of the federal cases argued in District
Courts involved simple drug possession. Even the small number of
possession charges is likely to give an inflated impression of the
numbers. It is likely that a significant percentage of those in prison
on possession charges were people who were originally arrested for
trafficking or another more serious drug crime but plea-bargained
down to a simple possession charge.208 “Non violent drug user” can
also mean heroin and crack dealers who did not get caught with
their weapons.

These evil merchants of death and destruction will be put back
in the Black and Hispanic communities to deal their drugs again.
Paul just wants them free, not on probation or parole.

207. Ibid.



Paul also wants to turn gangs loose in the ghetto. On May 11,
2005 he voted against the Gang Deterrence and Community
Protection Act:

Mr. PAUL. Mr. Chairman, the Gang Deterrence and
Community Protection Act, (H.R. 1279), is the latest
example of Congress disregarding its constitutional
limitations in the name of “getting tough on crime.”
Gang crime is certainly a serious issue in many parts
of the country. However, unless criminal gangs are
engaging in counterfeiting, treason, or piracy, the
federal government has no jurisdiction over the
criminal activities of gangs. In fact, by creating new
federal crimes related to gang activities, but
unrelated to one of the federal crimes enumerated in
the Constitution, the new federal crimes and
enhanced penalties in this bill usurp state and local
authority. Finally, I must oppose this bill because it
expands the Federal death penalty. While I recognize
that nothing in the Constitution forbids Federal, State,
or local governments from imposing a death penalty,
I have come to the conclusion that a consistent pro-
life position requires opposition to any legislation
imposing a Federal death penalty for unconstitutional
Federal crimes. Mr. Speaker, I do not advocate
Federal action to stop individual States from
imposing a death penalty, I simply oppose
compounding the damage done by creating new
Federal crimes by making those crimes subject to a
Federal death penalty. H.R. 1279 exceeds
Congress’s constitutional authority by creating new
Federal crimes, thus further burdening the already
overwhelmed Federal judiciary system and taking
another step toward upending our constitutional
system by turning the States into administrative


districts of the Federal Government. This bill also
creates unwise mandatory minimum sentences,
usurping the sentencing decisions of judges and
juries. Finally, H.R. 1279 raises serious moral issues
by expanding the use of the Federal death penalty.
Therefore, I must oppose H.R. 1279 and urge my
colleagues to do same.209

Paul defended doctors who ran practices where drugs like
oxycontin were promiscuously prescribed to pill head patients:

Doctors are even being punished for the misdeeds of
their patients. For example, Dr. James Graves was
sentenced to more than 60 years for manslaughter
because several of his patients overdosed on various
combinations of pain medications and other drugs,
including illegal street drugs. As a physician with over
thirty years experience in private practice, I find it
outrageous that a physician would be held criminally
liable for a patient’s misuse of medicine.210

Florida Assistant State Attorney Russ Edgar stated that Dr.
Graves was fully aware that his patients were abusing the drugs,
and that a trip to the 55-year-old doctor's office was a veritable
"tailgate party" for such abusers. By running a "prescription mill," the
doctor was making $500,000 a year, Edgar argued in court. So
much for Paul’s expertise in law enforcement. So if you take
President Paul’s desire to see heroin and crack legalized and put it
together will his support of the racist pigs David Duke and Jarrod
Taylor and opposition to a clean needle program perhaps you can
really figure out where Paul is coming from.


The most bizarre part of Paul’s promise to legalize drugs lies is
his contention that FDR was responsible for marijuana prohibition:

But prohibition, obviously, when they passed that
amendment to the Constitution, recognized that the
Congress could not pass laws. And like I mentioned
in 1937, when Roosevelt decided that we should
attack medical marijuana, that he would do it through
raising taxes. So it is only in recent history that we
have decided that this is a Federal project. The
record is just not very clear it has been very

Herbert Hoover was president in 1937 not FDR. Most
knowledgeable pot smokers know that it was the racist Republican
Harry Anslinger (pictured above in the light overcoat overseeing a
marihuana seizure) who convinced Congress to make pot illegal.
Harry J. Anslinger quotes: “...the primary reason to outlaw marijuana
is its effect on the degenerate races.” “Marihuana leads to pacifism



and communist brainwashing.” “There are 100,000 total marijuana
smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and
entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from
marijuana usage. This marijuana causes white women to seek
sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”
Anslinger was a creation of the racist, pro-Nazi Hoover
Administration as demonstrated by this chronology of his career:

 1928 : International Congress against Alcoholism,
Antwerp, Belgium

 1928 : Conference to Revise Treaty with US, Ottawa,

 1929-1930 : Assistant Commissioner of Prohibition

 1930-1962 : Commissioner of Federal Bureau of


Willis Carto called himself a Jeffersonian
Libertarian: Paul calls himself the same thing
and pretends to take a libertarian position on
medical marijuana so that people won’t think
that he is a Nazi. This is a lie designed to
attract the many people in America who are
tired of the War on Drugs. Paul is an
advocate of medical marijuana only because he sees a whole lot of
discontented people who are being oppressed just as Hitler saw the
German’s suffering under the Weimar Republic. He is exploiting this
for his own ends – he is the only pro-pot candidate who never
smoked marijuana in his life. If Paul were President the only thing
he could do would be to take pot off the DEA’s Schedule One list of

(1) Schedule I.—


(A) The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.

(B) The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States.

(C) There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other
substance under medical supervision.

Paul co-sponsored the States' Rights to Medical Marijuana Act:

Title: To provide for the medical use of marijuana in
accordance with the laws of the various States.

Summary: Transfers marijuana from schedule I of the
Controlled Substances Act to schedule II of such Act.
Declares that, in a State in which marijuana may be
prescribed or recommended by a physician for
medical use under applicable State law, no provision
of the Controlled Substances Act shall prohibit or
otherwise restrict:

1. The prescription or recommendation of marijuana
by a physician for medical use;

2. An individual from obtaining and using marijuana
from a physician's prescription or recommendation of
marijuana for medical use; or

3. A pharmacy from obtaining and holding marijuana
for the prescription or recommendation of marijuana
by a physician for medical use under applicable State

4. Prohibits any provision of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act from prohibiting or restricting a
State entity from producing or distributing marijuana
for the purpose of its distribution for prescription or
recommendation by a physician in a State in which

marijuana may be prescribed by a physician for
medical use.212

On May 11, 2011 he made this statement introducing the
Industrial Hemp Farming Act, HR 1831:

Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Industrial Hemp
Farming Act. The Industrial Hemp Farming Act
requires the federal government to respect state laws
allowing the growing of industrial hemp. Nine States--
Hawaii, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Montana, North
Dakota, Oregon, Vermont, and West Virginia--allow
industrial hemp production or research in accord with
state laws. However, federal law is standing in the
way of farmers in these states growing what may be
a very profitable crop. Because of current federal law,
all hemp included in products sold in the United
States must be imported instead of being grown by
American farmers.213

This is what attracts the legalize
pot crowd to Paul and I can
understand it having been one of
the founders of the Legalize Pot
Movement back in 1967 along with
Irvin Dana Beal who is serving a
long sentence for possession and
distribution of pot. Many voters
know others who have had to go to jail or prison as a result of the
drug laws, some of whom had serious medical conditions that




ingesting or smoking cannabis mitigated. The Paulbots are
generally skeptical about politician’s campaign promises but are
willing to take Paul at his word when it comes to pot. Another
problem is that none of the other presidential candidates including
Obama favor decriminalization or legalization. So Paul has co-opted
a real issue that he has used to further his main agenda which is
racist and genocidal in nature. Would Dr. Paul prescribe medical

Just because I favor the legalization of drugs doesn’t
mean I favor using them, of course. As a physician, I
know they’re bad stuff. – Ron Paul214

The federal war on drugs has proven costly and
ineffective, while creating terrible, violent crime. But if
you question policy, you are accused of being pro-
drug. That is preposterous. As a physician, father,
and grandfather, I abhor drugs. I just know that there
is a better way — through local laws, communities,
churches, and families — to combat the very serious
problem of drug abuse than a massive federal-
government bureaucracy. - Ron Paul215

Paul has to walk a fine line because the people who put him in
office are anti-drug:

Those who favor strict drug laws should understand
that federal preemption is a double-edged sword. For
example, if a socially conservative state like Utah
wanted to enact harsh drug policies to reflect its
community standards, federal law could actually

215. http://vote-

prevent the enactment of such policies. When the
American people give up state and local authority
over any issue, whether its marijuana, abortion, or
gun control, they give up most of their power to affect
policy. It’s far easier to influence, and hold
accountable, state and local officials. Once the
federal government takes the opposite side of an
issue, however, good luck changing things.216

This is nonsense. The Federal Government could not prevent
New York State from passing the Rockefeller Drug Laws and who
says that the federal government would be motivated in that


Since President Ron Paul the “constitutionalist” opposes
separation of powers America under President Paul would soon
become a dictatorship:

Tell Congress to pass H.R. 958!

Congress has the authority under Articles I, III and IV
of the Constitution of the United States to set limits
on the Supreme Court and lower federal courts in
order to correct abuses of judicial power and
continuing violations of the Constitution by federal

We the People Act (H.R. 958) says the “The
Supreme Court of the United States and each
Federal court” may not adjudicate any claim involving
the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit
of local government relating to the free exercise or



establishment of religion; any claim based upon the
right of privacy, including any such claim related to
any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or
reproduction; or any claim based upon equal
protection of the laws to the extent such claim is
based upon the right to marry without regard to sex
or sexual orientation; and that a violation by a justice
or a judge of any of the provisions of the Act shall be
an impeachable offense, and a material breach of
good behavior subject to removal by the President of
the United States according to rules and procedures
established by the Congress.217

The United States Constitution Section 1 - Judicial powers – reads:

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be
vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior
Courts as the Congress may from time to
time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the
supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices
during good Behavior, and shall, at stated Times,
receive for their Services a Compensation which
shall not be diminished during their Continuance in

So one can only assume that Ron Paul will deem the decisions
that he does not like as bad behavior and fire the Justices who
rendered them. Paul is no constitutionalist – he wants a dictatorship.

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to support, and
cosponsor, the Pledge Protection Act (HR 2028),
which restricts federal court jurisdiction over the
question of whether the phrase “under God” should
be included in the pledge of allegiance. Local schools



should determine for themselves whether or not
students should say “under God” in the pledge. The
case finding it is a violation of the First Amendment to
include the words “under God” in the pledge is yet
another example of federal judges abusing their
power by usurping state and local governments’
authority over matters such as education. Congress
has the constitutional authority to rein in the federal
courts’ jurisdiction and the duty to preserve the
states’ republican forms of governments. Since
government by the federal judiciary undermines the
states’ republican governments, Congress has a duty
to rein in rogue federal judges. I am pleased to see
Congress exercise its authority to protect the states
from an out-of-control judiciary. While I will support
this bill even if the language removing the United
States Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over cases
regarding the pledge is eliminated, I am troubled that
some of my colleagues question whether Congress
has the authority to limit Supreme Court jurisdiction in
this case. Both the clear language of the United
States Constitution and a long line of legal
precedents make it clear that Congress has the
authority to limit the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction.
The Framers intended Congress to use the power to
limit jurisdiction as a check on all federal
judges, including Supreme Court judges , who, after
all, have lifetime tenure and are thus unaccountable
to the people.218



This is a very slippery slope. If Congress were able to limit the
jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over cases with which it had
problems with this would be a first step in destroying the separation
of powers clause in the United States Constitution. The Separation
of Powers devised by the framers of the Constitution was designed
to do one primary thing: to prevent the majority from ruling with an
iron fist. Based on their experience, the framers shied away from
giving any branch of the new government too much power. The
separation of powers provides a system of shared power known
as Checks and Balances.

Three branches are created in the Constitution. The Legislative,
composed of the House and Senate. The Executive, composed of
the President, Vice-President, and the Departments. The Judicial,
composed of the federal courts and the Supreme Court. Each of
these branches has certain powers, and each of these powers is
limited, or checked, by another branch. Paul stated: “The Founders
recognized that one of the chief dangers to liberty was the
concentration of power in a few hands, which is why they carefully
divided power among the three branches.” But the Nazi Paul wants
to throw a monkey wrench into this balance of power and pave the
way for a dictatorship in America. When it suits Paul’s hidden
agenda he flushes the constitution right down the toilet.


In an 1802 letter to the Danbury (Conn.) Baptist Association,
Thomas Jefferson, then president, declared that the American
people through the First Amendment had erected a "wall of
separation between church and state." Paul, who calls himself a
Jeffersonian, wants to force the judiciary into breaking down that


In recent years, we have seen numerous abuses
of power by Federal courts. Federal judges regularly
strike down state and local laws on subjects such as
religious liberty, sexual orientation, family relations,
education, and abortion. This government by Federal
judiciary causes a virtual nullification of the Tenth
Amendment’s limitations on federal power.
Furthermore, when federal judges impose their
preferred polices on state and local governments,
instead of respecting the policies adopted by those
elected by, and thus accountable to, the people,
republican government is threatened. Article IV,
section 4 of the United States Constitution
guarantees each state a republican form of
government. Thus, Congress must act when the
executive or judicial branch threatens the republican
governments of the individual states. Therefore,
Congress has a responsibility to stop Federal judges
from running roughshod over state and local laws.
The Founders would certainly have supported
congressional action to reign in Federal judges who
tell citizens where they can and can’t place manger
scenes at Christmas.219

The founding fathers did not mention God in the Constitution,
and the faithful often regarded our early presidents as insufficiently
pious. George Washington was a nominal Anglican who rarely
stayed for Communion. John Adams was a Unitarian, which
Trinitarians abhorred as heresy. Thomas Jefferson, denounced as
an atheist, was actually a deist who detested organized religion and
who produced an expurgated version of the New Testament with the
miracles eliminated. Jefferson and James Madison, a nominal

219. Congressional Record, V. 153, Pt. 1, January 4, 2007 to January 17,
2007 page 374


Episcopalian, were the architects of the Virginia Statute of Religious

Paul wants America to move closer to Republic and farther
away from democracy. In a tirade to Congress entitled A Wise
Consistency on February 11, 2004 Paul proclaimed:

We should give up our obsession with democracy,
both for ourselves and others, since the dictatorship
of the majority is just as destructive to a minority,
especially individual liberty.

Paul also wants to strip power from the executive branch: Paul
was the sponsor of H.R. 2655, the Separation of Powers
Restoration Act. His legislation would terminate all existing states of
national emergency and remove from the executive any power to
declare national emergencies; vest power in Congress alone to
declare states of national emergencies; restrict presidential power to
issue executive orders by denying them any force of law except as
provided for by Congress; and repeal the 1973 War Powers
Resolution, which, Paul noted, granted broad war-making authority
to the president. This would make it more difficult to dispatch
America troops to Israel and would throw the balance of power
between the President, the Commander and Chief, and Congress
out of whack.


Ron Paul is immensely popular among the war-weary Iraq and
Afghanistan veterans. This is because they would much rather be in
a peacetime army. Hitler was also popular among the war-weary
veterans of World War I. They participated in riots against the Jews
and Communists and made up the majority of the members of the
S.A. the Stormtroopers. Paul stated:

The elimination of Osama bin Laden should now
prompt us to bring our troops home from Afghanistan

and Iraq. Al Qaeda was never in Iraq and we were
supposedly in Afghanistan to get Osama bin Laden.
With bin Laden gone, there is no reason for our
presence in the region – unless indeed it was all
about oil, nation-building, and remaking the Middle
East and Central Asia. – Ron Paul220

President Ron Paul would bring back approximately 310,000
Active Duty personnel from overseas where they can join the more
than one million troops stationed in the United States not counting
the Reserves? What are they going to do in the United States? Will
they rebuild the infrastructure? Nope that would be socialism. Will
they collect their usual paychecks? Paul:

We don't need to pay all this money to keep troops
all over the country, 130 countries, 900 bases. But
also, just think, bringing all the troops home rather
rapidly, they would be spending their money here at
home and not in Germany and Japan and South
Korea, tremendous boost to the economy.221

Paul is counting Marine guards and military attaches as part of
a vast expanse of U.S. military power around the globe. But only 11
countries actually house more than 1,000 U.S. military personnel.
Guess Paul never heard of armed forces personnel spending their
money at a PX and living in base housing when they are stationed
overseas? Bringing home the troops may cost taxpayers less but in
the long run they will get much less security for their money, less
bang for the buck. What good will the armed forces do in US?
Defend our borders from foreign invasion? Become Storm Troopers




at the beck and call of their Commander and Chief, Herr President
Ron Paul? If Paul ends welfare, unemployment insurance,
Medicaid, Medicare, and allows U.S. States to bring back
segregation, abolishes the FDIC and Fed he will need more than the
National Guard to suppress an internal rebellion.

Okay all the troops return: Will we build more bases to house
them? Will they have to purchase home mortgages or pay rent? Will
this really stimulate the American economy as Paul claims? Will
they eventually get discharged from the Army and into the private
sector in order to save even more money? They will be a drain on
the economy not a boom as their military training is not always
applicable to civilian life. Many would end up homeless, on the


As a logical consequence stemming from his belief that there
are only three federal crimes, and assuming Paul really believes it,
Ron Paul would do away with the federal laws against prostitution.
Here are the laws he would ask Congress to revoke:

1) MANN ACT - Only applies if someone pays the
travel costs like an airline ticket and crosses state
lines for the purpose of prostitution. It is very rare for
the Feds to go after folks under the Mann Act and
usually no one is paying directly for transportation.
The law was originally referred to as the “White-Slave
Traffic Act of 1910” and prohibited white slavery. It
also banned the interstate transport of females for
“immoral purposes.” Its primary stated intent was to
address prostitution, immorality, and human
trafficking. The act is better known as the Mann Act,
after James Robert Mann, an American lawmaker.


2) TRAVEL ACT – The Federal racketeering laws
contain a provision, much loved by prosecutors,
commonly known as the “Travel Act” — and more
formally as “Interstate and foreign travel or
transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises.” The
Travel Act makes it a crime to travel in interstate
commerce with the intention of, among other things,
promoting, conducting or distributing the proceeds of
unlawful activity (expressly including prostitution), if,
after the travel, such an illegal activity is performed. It
would, for example, be a felony violation of the Travel
Act (punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment), to
travel across state lines (or aid and abet a prostitute
in doing so) for the purpose of promoting or carrying
on the business of a prostitution ring; it would,
similarly (and separately), violate the Travel Act to
send the prostitute back across state lines to
distribute the proceeds of the prostitution.

3) The PROTECT ACT specifically implemented
several amendments in connection with sex tourism
and commercial sexual exploitation: (1) in the area of
sex tourism, new provision 2423© makes it sufficient
to show that a United States citizen or lawful
permanent resident traveled abroad and engaged in
any illicit sexual conduct with a minor, regardless of
what his intentions may have been when he left the
United States; (2) the addition of 2423(d) specifically
reaches any person who knowingly “arranges,
induces, procures, or facilitates the travel” of an
individual they know is traveling for the purpose of
engaging in illicit sexual conduct, when they engage
in facilitating the travel for the purpose of commercial
advantage or private financial gain; (3) new provision
2423(e) punishes an attempt or conspiracy to violate


any of the provisions in 2423; (4) the definitions
contained in 2423(f) broaden the prohibited conduct
under the statute to include commercial sex acts (as
defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1591©(1)) with persons under
18; and (5) for defendants charged under the sex
tourism provision, 2423© an affirmative defense was
added for defendant who “reasonably believed” that
person who had engaged in the commercial sex act
was 18. The defendant bears the burden of proving
the affirmative defense by a preponderance of the

The PROTECT ACT also changed the sentencing
scheme for 18 U.S.C. § 2423. For 18 U.S.C. §
2423(a)(traveling for criminal sex act) the maximum
sentence was upgraded to 30 years imprisonment.
Formerly, the equivalent provision had a maximum
sentence of 15 years. A mandatory minimum
sentence of 5 years was also enacted. In the revision
to section 2423(b), the maximum sentence was also
upgraded from 15 to 30 years imprisonment.

Paul voted against a bill congratulating the Government of
South Africa upon its first two successful convictions for human
trafficking. How are state governments going to fight international
human traffickers? Human trafficking involves an act of recruiting,
transporting, transferring, harboring or receiving a person through a
use of force, coercion or other means, for the purpose of exploiting
them. Is this what liberty means to Ron Paul, the right to exploit
other human beings? Where do Ron Paul’s freedom end and other
people’s rights begin?



We are bound and determined to write more rules
and regulations dealing with the first and the second
amendment, and I do not see this as a good trend. It
is said today that those who want to undermine the
first amendment, that it is already established that
pornography is not protected under the first
amendment. And today the goal is to make sure that
the depiction of violence is not protected under the
first amendment. But do my colleagues know that the
major cause of violence in the world throughout
history have been abuse of religion and the abuse of
philosophy? So, therefore, the next step will be, if we
can limit the depiction of pornography and then
violence, be the limitation of the depiction of a
philosophy that deals with religion or political systems
such as Communism or other fascism.222


Paul voted against requiring operators of wi-fi networks who
discover the transmission of child porn and other forms online sex
predation to report it to the government.223 Ron Paul defended his
stand in these words:

Mr. Speaker, as a parent, grandparent and OB-GYN
who has had the privilege of delivering over 4,000


223. Josh Harkinson, Ron Paul's 15 Most Extreme Positions, Mother
Jones, May 16, 2011


babies, I share the revulsion of all decent people at
child pornography. Those who would destroy the
innocence of children by using them in sexually-
explicit material deserve the harshest punishment.
However, the Child Obscenity and Pornography
Prevention Act (HR 4623) exceeds Congress’
constitutional power and does nothing to protect any
child from being abused and exploited by
pornographers. Instead, HR 4623 redirects law
enforcement resources to investigations and
prosecutions of “virtual” pornography which, by
definition, do not involve the abuse or exploitation of
children. Therefore, HR 4623 may reduce law
enforcement’s ability to investigate and prosecute
legitimate cases of child pornography.

Legislation outlawing virtual pornography is, to say
the least, of dubious constitutionality. The constitution
grants the federal government jurisdiction over only
three crimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It is
hard to stretch the definition of treason,
counterfeiting, or piracy to cover sending obscene or
pornographic materials over the Internet. Therefore,
Congress should leave the issue of whether or not to
regulate or outlaw virtual pornography to states and
local governments.

In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I share my
colleagues' revulsion at child pornography, I do not
believe that this justifies expanding the federal police
state to outlaw distribution of pornographic images
not containing actual children. I am further concerned
by the possibility that passage of HR 4623 will divert
law enforcement resources away from the
prosecution of actual child pornography. HR 4623
also represents another step toward the

nationalization of all police functions, a dangerous
trend that will undermine both effective law
enforcement and constitutional government. It is for
these reasons that I must oppose this well-
intentioned but fundamentally flawed bill. (Ron Paul
June 26, 2002).224

Here is one of the laws that President Paul would try to
get Congress to revoke or order the Justice Department and
the FBI to give low priority to:

8 U.S.C. § 1466A (2008)


(a) In general. Any person who, in a circumstance
described in subsection (d), knowingly produces,
distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to
distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a
drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that--

(1) (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit
conduct; and (B) is obscene; or

(2) (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of
a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or
masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including
genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal,
whether between persons of the same or opposite
sex; and

(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or
scientific value; or attempts or conspires to do so,



shall be subject to the penalties provided in section
2252A(b)(1) [18 USCS § 2252A(b)(1)], including the
penalties provided for cases involving a prior

Child pornography is an international problem and there is no way it
can be dealt with by local and state police departments. State and
local governments cannot make arrests overseas nor have their
liaisons overseas make arrests. Under a Ron Paul presidency
Dreamboard, referenced below would still be in operation and
Michael Childs, 49, of Huntsville, Alabama, (photo on the left) who
sentenced to 30 years in prison, and others like him, would be on
the street.

WASHINGTON – Attorney General Eric Holder
announced today the unsealing of three indictments
and one complaint charging a total of 72 individuals
for their participation in an international criminal
network dedicated to the sexual abuse of children
and the creation and dissemination of graphic images
and videos of child sexual abuse throughout the
world. Operation Delego, an ongoing investigation
that was launched in December 2009, targeted the
72 charged defendants and more than 500 additional
individuals around the world for their participation in
Dreamboard – a private, members-only, online
bulletin board that was created and operated to
promote pedophilia and encourage the sexual abuse
of very young children, in an environment designed


to avoid law enforcement detection. To date, 52 of
the 72 charged defendants have been arrested in the
United States and abroad. Members traded graphic
images and videos of adults molesting children 12
years-old and under, often violently, and collectively
created a massive private library of images of child
sexual abuse.225


Ron Paul has stated that there should be no “age of consent
law” in the federal statutes. But his newsletter espouses a different
view in cases where Black youth is involved:

We don’t think a child of 13 should be held as
responsible as a man of 23. That’s true for most
people, but black males age 13 who have been
raised on the streets and who have joined criminal
gangs are as big, strong, tough, scary and culpable
as any adult, and should be treated as such.

Aside from this Paul said that it should be OK by federal law for
a 24 year old man to convince a 10 year old boy or girl to have sex.
When pressed on this issue and other similar issues, Paul said that
the states should have no such laws either! So far we have
legalized prostitution and drugs on a federal level. What if the States
followed suit? A twelve year old girl should be able to live with a
pimp, sell her body, and use the proceeds to purchase heroin (after
her pimp takes a percentage, that is). Paul told Congress:

Mr. Chairman, I rise today in opposition to the Child
Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of
1998. This bill, if passed, will further expand the



authority of this country’s national police force and
further “justify” the federal Justice Department’s
intrusion into mail, telephone and Internet

In a one minute twenty-four second interview with Peter Zottolo
shown on YOUTUBE227, Ron Paul says he supports NAMBLA and
so does the constitution. Nov 29, 2007

COMMENT: Some jackass got pwnd when his
joke backfired. Don't know what NAMBLA is?
It’s The North American Man / Boy Love
Association. Yeah, something tells me Ron
Paul wont like that.

On March 14, 2002 Paul voted against the Federal Penalties for
Child Sexual Abuse Act:

The bill before us today simply expands Federal
penalties for already existing Federal crimes, and




does not in any way infringe on the jurisdiction of the
States. However, Mr. Chairman, I would ask my
colleagues to consider whether child sexual abuse
should be a Federal crime at all. The Constitution
specifies three Federal crimes, namely treason,
piracy, and counterfeiting. It is a stretch, to say the
least, to define child abuse as a form of treason,
piracy, or counterfeiting. Therefore, perhaps the best
means of dealing with child sexual abuse occurring
on Federal lands across State lines is to turn the
suspected perpetrator over to the relevant local
jurisdiction and allow the local authorities to
prosecute the crime.

In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, while I believe this is a
worthy piece of legislation, I hope someday we will
debate whether expanding Federal crimes (along
with the use of congressionally mandated mandatory
minimum sentences) is consistent with constitutional
government and fundamental principles of justice.228


There would be no federal sexual harassment laws under a
Paul presidency.

In the past several months the airways have been
filled with Members of Congress relating or restating
their fidelity to their oath of office to uphold the
Constitution. That is good, and I am sure it is done
with the best of intentions. But when it comes to
explaining our constitutional responsibility to make
sure unconstitutional sexual harassment laws are
thoroughly enforced, while disregarding most



people’s instincts towards protecting privacy, it
seems to be overstating a point, compared to our
apathy toward the usurping of congressional power
to declare and wage war. That is something we ought
to be concerned about.229

Like all other drugs GHB, the date rape drug, would be legal:

I have extensive experience in the clinical use of
gamma hyudroxy butyric acid (GHB) . . . I have used
these substances for over ten years on hundreds of
patients (and have advised thousands through my
books and articles on the subject). I have not had
one instance reported to me of adverse effects in my
patients. GHB is the safest, most nontoxic sleep
inducing substance known. It has a wide range of
other therapeutic uses. The therapeutic threshold for
GHB is greater than almost any known
pharmaceutical substance (the LD50 is40–100 times
greater than the sleep-inducing therapeutic dose
of 3–6 grams!). For each of the aforementioned
procedural and substantive reasons, I must again
oppose H.R. 2130, the Hillory J. Farias Date-
Rape Prevention Drug Act.230

GHB is available in odorless, colorless, and tasteless form that
is frequently combined with alcohol and other beverages. GHB has
been used to commit sexual assaults due to its ability to sedate and
incapacitate unsuspecting victims, preventing them from resisting
sexual assault.

229. A Foreign Policy of Freedom By Ron Paul page 84



Paul voted against life sentences for rapists and child molesters
using the same tired excuse:

Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the policy behind H.R. 4679,
the Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act, is
unobjectionable. Given the high rates of recidivism
among sex criminals, it is certainly legitimate to take
steps to reduce the likelihood that a paroled sex
criminal will commit further crimes. In fact, given the
likelihood that a sex offender will attempt to commit
another sex crime, it is reasonable to ask why rapists
and child molesters are not simply imprisoned for
life? However, Mr. Speaker, questions of the proper
punishment for sexual crimes are not issues properly
under federal jurisdiction. The Constitution grants the
federal government jurisdiction over only three
crimes: treason, counterfeiting, and piracy. It is hard
to stretch the definition of treason, counterfeiting, or
piracy to include sex crimes. Therefore, even though
I agree with the policy behind H.R. 4679, I must
remind my colleagues that the responsibility for
investigating, prosecuting and punishing sex crimes
is solely that of state and local governments.231


Pain Relief Promotion Act of 1999 (H.R. 2260) 27 October

Being strongly pro-life, I’m convinced that the Roe vs.
Wade Supreme Court decision of 1973 is one of the
worst, if not the worst, Supreme Court ruling of the
20th century. It has been this institutionalizing into



our legal system the lack of respect for life and liberty
that has and will continue to play havoc with liberty
and life until it is changed. It has been said by many
since the early 1970s that any legalization of abortion
would put us on a slippery slope to euthanasia. I
agree with this assessment.232

The intention of H.R. 2260 was to repeal the Oregon law
legalizing euthanasia and make a statement against it. None-the-
less Paul opposed it. However, following Paul’s line of reasoning
regarding the legalization of drugs if you are going to legalize these
sometimes lethal drugs like heroin why not legalize various poisons
like arsenic, shellfish toxin etc. to so that if you wanted to kill
yourself (or someone else) you would be at liberty to do so?

Additionally, this bill empowers the Attorney General
to train federal, state, and local law enforcement
personnel to discern the difference between palliative
care and euthanasia. Most recently, though, it was
the Attorney General who specifically exempted the
physicians of Oregon from certain provisions of Title
21, the very Title this legislation intends to augment.
Under the tutelage of the Attorney General, it would
thus become the federal police officer’s role to
determine at which point deaths from pain medication
constitute assisted suicide.233

Just as in Roe v Wade Paul refused to federalize a crime. He
did this time after time which makes me wonder why is he so closely
wedded to this abstract principle that there are only three federal

232. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 19, October 26, 1999 to November
3, 1999 page 27069

233. Congressional Record, V. 145, Pt. 19, October 26, 1999 to November
3, 1999 page 27098


crimes? According to Paul “Constitutionally, there are only three
federal crimes. These are treason against the United States, piracy
on the high seas, and counterfeiting (and for a short period of
history, the manufacture, sale, or transport of alcohol was
concurrently a federal and state crime).”

Is it worth adhering to these principles when a lack of federal
criminal enforcement is bound to lead to taking the lives of the
unborn and elderly and giving dope dealers, rapists, pornographers
and child molesters a freer hand? Is this his guiding principle in life
that there are only three federal crimes and this overrides everything
else? Isn’t that what the federal legislature does, make laws?


Roe vs. Wade Where To From Here? November 20, 2004

The 1973 Roe vs. Wade ruling caused great harm in
two distinct ways. First, it legalized abortion at any
stage, establishing clearly that the Supreme Court
and the government condoned the cheapening of
human life. Second, it firmly placed this crucial issue
in the hands of the federal courts and national
government. The federalization of abortion was
endorsed even by those who opposed abortion.
Instead of looking for state-by-state solutions and
limiting federal court jurisdiction, those anxious to
protect life came to rely on federal laws, eroding the
constitutional process. The authors of the
Constitution intended for criminal matters and acts of
violence (except for a few rare exceptions) to be
dealt with at the state level. Now, however,
conservatives as well as liberals find it acceptable to
nationalize issues such as abortion, marriage, prayer,
and personal sexual matters — with more federal
legislation offered as the only solution. This trend of


transferring power from the states to the federal
government compounds our problems — for when
we lose, it affects all 50 states, and overriding
Congress or the Supreme Court becomes far more
difficult than dealing with a single state.234

Of course the anti-abortion groups want federal legislation.
Otherwise if you want an abortion all you had to do was go to state
where it was legal. You could not have the State Police stopping
every pregnant woman to make sure she was not on her way to
another state to have an abortion. And how could the local
authorities determine if someone were in the early stages of
pregnancy? Would they have to carry around portable sonographic
imagers? Paul’s goal is to strip the Federal Government of all its
expanded powers and return to a confederacy.


Now, cruelty to animals, nobody is going to come and
defend cruelty to animals. But quite frankly there will
be times it will be difficult to define. The motivation for
most cruelty to animals is because people are sick.
This is a mental illness. We are dealing with mental
illness here and we are going to write a Federal law
against it. So if somebody, and it was even
mentioned by the proponents of this bill, that people
like Ted Bundy delight in this. Yes. These people are
psychopaths. They are nuts. It is an illness. We
cannot pass a law to deal with mental illness. I
strongly object to this approach. We should be
thinking not only about the process but of the



unintended consequences of passing legislation like

So cruelty to animals is a treatable illness, a mental illness and
not a crime. PETA might disagree.


Under President Paul every Jew-hating piece of crap would
come out of the woodwork and feel justified attacking Jews and
Jewish houses of worship, community centers etc.. Ron Paul’s mere
candidacy incited the firebombing of two synagogues in New
Jersey. Anthony Graziano threw a firebomb into the home of a rabbi
in Rutherford, New Jersey and attacked a synagogue in Paramus,
New Jersey. Paulbot Indian Hindu Aakash Dalal was his co-
conspirator. On the day of Graziano’s arrest, a letter to the editor
signed by Dalal was published on the web site of the Rutgers
student newspaper, the Daily Targum:

As it happens, Ron Paul accurately predicted the
2007-2008 housing crisis in 2002 on the floor of the
House, while others were oblivious. To empower the
Federal Reserve System and to ignore Paul’s ideas
would be irresponsible and illogical. Allowing the
Federal Reserve to continue to exist in its current
form is only rewarding failure and incompetence.236




The author was Aakash Dalal a
sophomore majoring in chemistry
and biological sciences. Dalal
had been friends with Graziano
since they both attended middle
school in Lodi. Both of these two
maggots joined the Rutgers
University chapter of a group
called the Young Americans for
Liberty, which used to be known as Students for Ron Paul. Dalal
who posted a picture of himself with Paul as his Facebook profile,
was charged with conspiring with Graziano to commit numerous
criminal acts aimed at Jews: nine counts of aggravated arson,
conspiracy to commit aggravated arson, bias intimidation and
criminal mischief. Dalal’s attorney, Chris DiLorenzo, said that Dalal
shouldn't be considered an accessory to the synagogue bombings
because the Rutgers student was on leave from college, out of
state, working for Ron Paul in the New Hampshire primaries when
the attacks took place in early January. Graziano was charged with
numerous counts of attempted murder. We can get a look at the
Ron Paul mentality from Graziano’s Facebook page.

The last post on Graziano’s Facebook page was on January
24, 2012 by Ck Rafuls. It was a link that said RONPAUL2012 but
went to a story about Graziano’s arrest. Ck advised him “Don’t drop
the soap Jew Killer.” On January 16, 2012 Graziano praised a black
football player who said he was going to vote for Paul. Arian Foster
must have thought his first name Aryan Foster. Graziano wrote
“Dude, you are an inspiration for…” on Foster’s wall. On January 11,
2012 Anthony posted a logo from Bromley Pure Green Tea and
Meth? January 11, 2012 was when Graziano firebombed the
Rutherford Rabbi’s home. January 8, 2012 “LIVE FREE OR DIE!
RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012!” Graziano posted “RON PAUL


2012! On Jew’s Wall on January 2nd.” Jew’s wall was supposed to
be pro-Jewish but was taken over by Jew haters. Graziano was
responsible for an arson committed in Paramus on January 3, 2012.
Graziano threw a bottle containing gasoline at the rear wall of
Congregation K'Hal Adath Jeshurun, but the resulting fire burned
out quickly. Graziano December 21, 2011: “Do or die. Ride or die
(he rode his bike to the attacks). We’ll build and multiply. Spread the
word (about Ron Paul) and salute (the new Hitler). Move without
fear, you are a tiger in the field, staring at prey.” Graziano’s prey
turned out to be some little Jewish children and their parents.
Graziano’s dad: OK PAUL HAS MY VOTE. Kenny Feola: Ron Paul
winning so far. When told that Paul was winning, Graziano wrote
“Yes he is, and obviously certain “people” (certain subhuman Jews)
who hang out in certain “establishments” (who are part of the power
structure) aren’t too happy.” Graziano was "weeks away" from
another attack because he had submitted paperwork in an attempt
to buy a gun before he was arrested.

In Plano Texas,237 a "Ron Paul grassroots
campaign organizer" who, FEC records show
donated heavily to Ron Paul's campaign,
Anson Chi , was seriously injured as a
homemade bomb he was carrying (most likely
to a neocon target) accidentally detonated.
Anson is well known online at Ron Paul Forums238 and even
developed a popular website on "How to become a delegate."239



On his talk show this week, Adam Vs The Man, Ron Pauloid
Adam Kokesh read an email from a viewer which said "There is a
way the nomination can be given to Ron Paul," he read
aloud."There is a way to fix the situation we currently face with
Obama versus Romney. Romney needs to die."240 Kokesh
responded that "it sure is tempting isn't it, to think that you could
take out one life and prevent the deaths of so many others." Kokesh
was contacted by the Secret Service. Douglas Wright, who plotted
to blow up a bridge spanning the Cuyahoga River, had Ron Paul
literature in his home. Wright’s indictment read,

Wright suggested getting a car that they can drive
into the Federal Reserve Bank with C-4, and blow it
up. Upon hearing Wright mention blowing up the
Federal Reserve Bank, Baxter advised this is now
higher scale, and wanted everyone to agree this was
an open discussion. Baxter advised people have
been attacking banks and the Federal Reserve for a
long time, and the Federal Reserve has branches all
over the country. The group discussed where the
Federal Reserve banks were located.241

Numerous Ron Paul supporters were present at an Occupy
Cleveland demonstration against the Fed.242






Ron Paul leaves Congress, still the pariah he always was. No
legislation name after him, any office buildings or bridges. But as
long as he is sentient he is a threat. Paul’s farewell speech to
Congress contained the same seemingly innocuous message and
there was only one interesting part:

Government use of force to mold social and
economic behavior at home and abroad has justified
individuals using force on their own terms. The fact
that violence by government is seen as morally
justified, is the reason why violence will increase
when the big financial crisis hits and becomes a
political crisis as well.

Paul hoped for a Depression scale financial crisis so he could rise to
power just as Hitler did. From what part of society will the increase
in violence come from? From Ron Paul’s Storm troopers.

First, we recognize that individuals shouldn’t initiate
violence, then we give the authority to government.


Eventually, the immoral use of government violence,
when things goes badly, will be used to justify an
individual’s “right” to do the same thing. Neither the
government nor individuals have the moral right to
initiate violence against another yet we are moving
toward the day when both will claim this authority. If
this cycle is not reversed society will break down.

When needs are pressing, conditions deteriorate
and rights become relative to the demands and the
whims of the majority. It’s then not a great leap for
individuals to take it upon themselves to use violence
to get what they claim is theirs.

Paul is making a convoluted argument for the use of violence
by individuals against the government. Paul blames the government
for any violence that may befall it. The Government uses violence
against its citizens and so the citizens justifiably resort to violence
against the Government, this is the cycle Paul referred to.

Then we learn that during a time of economic crisis the
majority, also known as the Federal Government will deprive people
of their rights. If this happens those who are being deprived of their
rights have a right to take up arms against the Federal Government.

What all this boils down to is that Ron Paul is a piece of the filth
that America has dredged up from its pro-Nazi and isolationist past.
In his world, freedom, liberty, and the Constitution wouldn’t exist;
tyranny and totalitarianism would reign. It would be the Fourth
Reich. Paul’s connection with the Jew hating pathological genocidal
maniacs of Liberty Lobby, his connection to the Jew hating Nazis
David Duke and Don Black, his defense of Nazi war criminals and
Holocaust deniers puts him a class several notches below child
molesters. Many pedophiles will let their victims live, the Nazis do



In the early 1970’s A. J. Weberman became a
widely known counter-culture figure after he
went through Bob Dylan’s garbage. He coined
the word “Garbology” to describe the
journalistic technique of searching through
trash for information and called himself a
garbologist. He also invented Dylanology -
another word he coined – which means the
study of Bob Dylan’s cryptic poetry. Weberman was the first to make
the connection between Watergaters E. Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis
and the Kennedy assassination. He was sued by E. Howard Hunt in
an effort to shut him up. Hunt later confessed to his son that he was
part of “the big event.” Weberman was able to depose former DCIA
Richard Helms, CI/SIG head James Angleton, G. Gordon Liddy,
Bernard Barker and others. Weberman worked as a researcher for
Sen. Richard Schweiker, (R-Pa) and as a Congressional researcher
for Cong. Henry Gonzalez (D-San Antonio, Texas). Weberman has
numerous political arrests including one for having tossed a tomato
at former President Nixon. Weberman, along with I. D. Beal, was the
founder of the Yippie Museum, an educational institution chartered
by the Board of Regents of New York State. He is the subject of an
award winning movie entitled The Ballad of A. J. Weberman. His
revolutionary circle included John Lennon, Yoko Ono, Jerry Rubin,
Abbie Hoffman, David Peel, Tom Forcade, Aron Kay and Phil Ochs.
Weberman’s other books are Coup D’Etat in America, the CIA and
the Assassination of JFK co-authored by Michael Canfield, My Life
In Garbology, The Dylan to English Dictionary, Homothug, The
Secret Life of Rudy Giuliani, The Devil and Bob Dylan and A History
of Islamist Terrorism in America. He is a Director of the Jewish
Defense Organization and a non-leader of the Youth International