2.4K views

Uploaded by Coenie_Odendaa_8871

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Grounding Design Analysis
- ETAP Ground Grid Systems
- System Substation Earthing
- Ground Grid Design
- Schneider Electric Earthing Systems
- Substation Design Guideliness
- Grounding Calculation
- Substation Grounding
- Design & Selection of Lightning Arrester
- Electrical Substation
- Earthing Practice
- @Practical Guide to Electrical Grounding, 1st Edition, 1999
- GUIDE FOR PREPARATION OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR POWER TRANSFORMERS
- Wiring Matters- IET 2009 Winter Publication
- 631 Earthing Systems Fundamentals of Calculation
- Earthing Calculation IEEE
- CYMGRD Manual-Grounding
- Substation Earthing Design
- 18 - Ground Grid
- SUBSTATION & SWITCHYARD STRUCTURE’S

You are on page 1of 13

Jerry Johnson

POWER Engineers, Inc.

Hailey, Idaho, USA

(208) 788-3456

September 1999

Table of Contents

ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 1

4.1 EFFECTS ON THE HUMAN BODY ............................................................................. 6

4.2 HIGH SPEED FAULT CLEARING .............................................................................. 6

4.3 EFFECTS ON TOLERABLE STEP AND TOUCH POTENTIALS....................................... 7

5.1 CALCULATION OF SF .............................................................................................. 9

5.2 DECREMENT FACTOR DF ...................................................................................... 10

REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 11

Factors that Affect Substation

Ground Grid Design

Abstract

This paper discusses three major factors that influence substation grounding system

design: 1) Soil Resistivity, 2) Fault Clearing Time and 3) Ground Fault Current. Each

must be considered along with short-comings of the analysis software and alternative

designs to develop a safe and the most economic solution.

1.0 Introduction

As available fault currents increase on today’s electrical power grid, interest in substation

grounding system design also increases. Personnel safety is primary, but the economics

are also a key factor. Engineers do not wish to “over design” grounding systems, but they

do want to design systems that protect personnel and equipment while providing an

optimized economic solution.

This paper discusses how each of these three factors can affect the design of a substation

grounding system.

Line-to-Ground faults occurring in or near a substation cause a current to flow from the

energized line through the buried ground grid in the station back to the source. This

current flow causes the grid to “rise in potential” above remote areas that are considered

to be at zero potential. The flow of current also causes the potential (voltage) or Ground

Potential Rise (GPR) to vary at different points in the substation. This can produce a

potential difference or Step Voltage between the feet of an individual standing on the

surface of the soil. This current flow can also cause a potential difference between metal

structures and various points on the surface of the soil. This difference results in a Touch

Voltage between the hands of an individual touching a structure and the individual’s feet

on the surface of the soil as illustrated in Figure 1.

The human body can withstand considerable voltage for a short period of time. For a

worker to be safe within a substation, this value must be below the level that will cause

the heart to fibrillate. The values of maximum allowable step and touch potentials for a

person weighing 50kg or 110lbs is defined as:

(1000 + 6Csρs)0.116

Estep = Eq 1 [1].

ts

(1000 + 1.5Csρs)0.116

Etouch = Eq 2 [1].

ts

Where:

Cs = the reduction factor for a high resistivity layer of crushed rock.

ρs = the resistivity of the surface material in Ω-m

ts = the duration of the shock current in seconds.

Usually the ground grid design will require a layer of high resistivity crushed rock placed

on the surface of the substation to act as an insulator between a person’s feet and the

substation grid and to raise the tolerable voltages. When the station grid is designed, this

feature can be used to decrease the amount of buried conductor used or to increase the

safety margin in the design. However, the cost of the crushed rock layer should be

considered since high resistivity rock may be difficult to find in certain areas.

The potential differences within a station result from the ground current flowing from the

grid conductors into the surrounding soil (earth). All soils have some resistance to

electric current flow which is measured as “resistivity”. The electrical resistivity of the

various layers of soil have a great influence on the resulting step and touch potentials

within the substation.

soil under a variety of conditions [2]. The study found that the resistivity of the soil

varied with soil type, density, moisture content, temperature and state (frozen or

unfrozen). Figure 2 shows how a clay soil was found to vary with temperature and state

for three different moisture contents.

As Figure 2 inicates, the resistivity rises linearly on the log scale as the temperature

drops; but after passing the frozen state it rises rapidly with the falling temperatures. The

percent moisture also has a strong influence on the resistivity. The higher the moisture

content, the higher the resistivity becomes when the soil is in the frozen state and lower

in the unfrozen state. It is important for the engineer/designer to determine moisture

content and temperature the soil can experience in the area of the substation when the

station grid is being designed. They also need to keep in mind the frost depth and

whether the ground rods penetrate unfrozen soil year round.

Figure 3 shows the ground grid that was used in the analysis. The following parameters

were used:

Conductor Burial Depth 18 inches

Conductor Size 4/0 AWG Copper

Grid Mesh Size 20 ft by 20 ft

Fault Current 10,000 Amperes

Fault Clearing Time 0.25 seconds

Soil Resistivity 25 Ω-m

Insulating Layer 4” of 3000 Ω-m Crushed Rock

180 ft

80 ft

Analysis of the grid was done using Safe Engineering Services, CDEGS Program [3]

using a uniform soil model of 25 Ω-m and 100 Ω-m. The values were taken from Figure

2, Curve 2 for temperatures of 5°C (41°F) and -5°C (23°F). The results of the case runs

show that for the 25 Ω-m case, the station meets IEEE 80 standards for both step and

touch potentials as illustrated in Figures 4 and 5. However, for the 100 Ω-m case,

allowable touch voltages are exceeded throughout the station grid as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 4: Step Potential Plot for 25 Ω-m Soil Case

Possible solutions would be to add additional conductor and/or ground rods to lower the

potential differences to allowable values. Alternative means to achieve safety include

equipment platforms electrically connected to the equipment or 6” buried mesh around

the equipment.

The effects of an electrical current passing through vital parts of the human body depend

on the magnitude, duration and frequency of the current. The most serious consequence

from exposure is ventricular fibrillation, resulting in stoppage of blood circulation.

The human body is very susceptible to the effects of current at power frequencies (50Hz

and 60Hz). Currents of approximately 0.1mA can be lethal. The most common effects of

electrical shock on the body are perception, muscular contraction, unconsciousness, heart

fibrillation, respiratory nerve blockage and burning [1].

Another means to reduce the dangerous fault circumstances is to modify the fault clearing

time.

faults that persist for several minutes.

2. Experience as well as tests show that the chance for serious injury or death is reduced

if the duration of current through the body is very brief. The allowable current values

may be based on the primary relaying or protective devices, or in some cases, that of

the backup relaying.

IEEE 80 states that a good case can be made for using the primary protective device

clearing time to calculate the maximum allowable step and touch potentials. This is due

to the low combined probability that the primary relay malfunctions will coincide with all

other adverse factors that are needed for an accident [1].

Equations 1 and 2 show the relationship of the fault clearing times to the allowable values

of step and touch potentials. Since ts is in the denominator of each equation, the smaller

the clearing time the larger the allowable values of step and touch. Using fault clearing

values of 0.25sec. and 1.0sec. in the previous 25 Ω-m case analyzed, shows that the

allowable touch potential is exceeded for the 1.0 sec. case along the perimeter of the

station as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Touch Potential Plot for 25 Ω-m Soil Case 1.0 second Clearing Time

To design the station to meet backup relaying contingencies, additional ground conductor

(smaller grid spacing) would be required for the substation to meet IEEE 80 standards for

touch potential.

5.0 Fault Current

design has been receiving a lot of attention. For many years, engineers have been using

the maximum line to ground fault values in their designs. This approach is being looked

at more closely. Computer analysis and other techniques can be used to determine the

value for the maximum grid current. This can result in a more cost-effective substation

ground grid that still meets IEEE 80 standards [1].

Another reason for determining a more accurate value of the grid current is the increasing

magnitudes of fault currents. These increasing currents have a direct relationship to

increasing the GPR making it difficult and expensive to protect communication circuits

[4].

The symmetrical grid current that flows between the ground grid and the surrounding

earth is defined as:

Ig = SfIf Eq 3 [1].

Where:

Ig = symmetrical grid current in Amps.

Sf = current division factor relating the magnitude of fault current to that of the

grid current.

If = rms value of the symmetrical ground fault current in Amps.

The design value of the maximum grid current is then defined as:

IG = CpDfIg Eq 4 [1].

Where:

IG = maximum grid current in Amps.

Cp = projection factor for the increase in fault current during the station life-span.

Cp = 1 is for zero future growth.

Df =Decrement factor based on the fault clearing time, ts.

5.1 Calculation of Sf

Computer programs are available to calculate the current division factor Sf. These

programs accurately calculate the actual maximum ground fault current flowing in the

grid, but they require a considerable amount of data to be input into the program. In many

cases, an approximation can be used to estimate the value of Sf. In some situations this

approximation value is sufficient for designing the grounding system.

Southern Company Services and Georgia Power Company developed a set of curves,

which can be used to approximate Sf [4]. The information required to use these graphs is

the number of transmission and distribution lines at the substation and the substation grid

resistance. A typical graph is shown in Figure 8.

For the case run previously, if one transmission line serves the station and two

distribution feeders exit the station and the calculated grid resistance is 0.3 Ω (from the

output of the CDEGS Program), Figure 8 can be used to determine Sf . This value is

approximately 75% or 0.75. Using this value of Sf , the symmetrical grid current Ig is

equal to 0.75*10,000 or 7,500Amps.

5.2 Decrement Factor Df

The maximum grid current IG, is the maximum asymmetrical ac current that will flow

between the station grid and the surrounding soil. This current is defined by Equation 4

and includes the symmetrical current Ig as well as a correction factor for the dc

component, the transient and subtransient ac components. Both the ac transient and

subtransient as well as the dc component decay exponentially. The design of the station

ground grid must take into account the asymmetrical current; therefore a Decrement

Factor, Df is derived to take into account these asymmetrical components. The decrement

factor can be computed by using Equation 5.

Ta

Df = 1 + (1 − e − tf Ta

) Eq 5 [1].

tf

Where:

tf = fault clearing time in seconds.

Ta = equivalent system subtransient time constant in seconds.

Typical values of the decrement factor are provided by IEEE 80 for an assumed X/R ratio

of 20 and are shown in Table 1.

Fault Duration (sec.) Cycles (60Hz ac) Decrement Factor

0.008 0.5 1.65

0.1 5 1.25

0.25 15 1.10

0.5 or longer 30 or more 1.0

Using the typical value of the decrement factor for the fault clearing time of 0.25 sec., a

growth projection factor of 15% and data previously calculated yield IG as:

IG = (1.15)(1.10)(7,500)

IG = 9,487A

This value would be used in the final design of the substation grid instead of the 10,000

Ampere value used previously.

6.0 Summary

The soil’s electrical resistivity can vary with the temperature and moisture content. These

variables need to be taken into account in the design and analysis to ensure the station

grid meets IEEE 80 standards for the varying soil conditions.

The human body can withstand exposure to high current levels for only a short period of

time. High-speed fault clearing is essential to minimize the exposure time to the levels of

fault currents available in most substations. Quick clearing of faults also allows higher

permissible touch and step voltages.

The maximum grid current must also be considered. Much of the station’s ground fault

current may be carried out of the station by overhead static wires or system neutral wires.

Calculation of the current division factor is important, so that the station’s grid is not over

designed.

Many factors are involved in the design of a substation ground grid. These factors

determine the extent and amount of ground conductor required for the substation grid

design. When these factors are optimized, an economic station ground grid that meets or

exceeds IEEE standard can be designed.

References

1. “IEEE Guide for Safety in Substation Grounding”, IEEE Standard 80-1986, Institute

of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc. New York, 1986.

Electrical Association, July 1988.

Grounding System Fault Currents Using Graphical Analysis”, IEEE Transactions on

Power Delivery, Vol. PWRD-2, No. 3, pp. 725-732, July 1987.

- Grounding Design AnalysisUploaded byreply2amit1986
- ETAP Ground Grid SystemsUploaded bySeanChan
- System Substation EarthingUploaded byBabar Saleem
- Ground Grid DesignUploaded byReza Torkaman
- Schneider Electric Earthing SystemsUploaded bySeanChan
- Substation Design GuidelinessUploaded byPradeep Kumar Maraptla
- Grounding CalculationUploaded byT S Virdi
- Substation GroundingUploaded bygosalhs9395
- Design & Selection of Lightning ArresterUploaded byAnkur_soni
- Electrical SubstationUploaded byMohammedSaadaniHassani
- Earthing PracticeUploaded byChetan Ramteke
- @Practical Guide to Electrical Grounding, 1st Edition, 1999Uploaded bycyong7788
- GUIDE FOR PREPARATION OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR POWER TRANSFORMERSUploaded byme_vahabi
- Wiring Matters- IET 2009 Winter PublicationUploaded bylalindadef
- 631 Earthing Systems Fundamentals of CalculationUploaded byGhassan Al Salem
- Earthing Calculation IEEEUploaded byAitor Lander Iza
- CYMGRD Manual-GroundingUploaded byahmedanas
- Substation Earthing DesignUploaded byRaj Prakash
- 18 - Ground GridUploaded byleoarcangel
- SUBSTATION & SWITCHYARD STRUCTURE’SUploaded bynestlejin
- Earthing CalculationUploaded byHesham Abdullah AlAdwan
- Design of Grounding System for GIS Indoor SubstationUploaded byzerferuz
- Plaquette_SES-CDEGSUploaded bycarcejerome
- Earth Mat CalculationsUploaded byRohit Madaan
- DSLP dirct srole lightning protectionUploaded bygsaiswaroopg
- cdegsUploaded byChristopher Perkins
- Earthing HandbookUploaded byRonan O'Shea
- EARTHING CALCULATION.pdfUploaded byTimothy Green
- Transformer Ngr Sizing CalculationUploaded byanuvdev

- Heat TransferUploaded bystylishhunterp
- Phys ch 8Uploaded byjohnny
- ECT207Uploaded byv2304451
- Enhanced Fault Ride-Through Method ForUploaded byRaviYadav
- Comparing Transformer Derating Computed Using the Harmonic Loss Factor FHL and K-FactoUploaded byKhajaBurhan
- Turlock Electric Rates - Schedule BPUploaded byGenability
- MHS Physics Problems Chapter 9Uploaded byKlaus Danjolli
- ABB Auxiliary Signalling and Trippning Relays RXMA 1 RXMA 2 RXMS 1 RXSF 1 RXME 1 RXME 18 RXMH 2 RXMUploaded byNeelakandan Masilamani
- Water PumpUploaded byFirdaus Zahari
- 2Z_12regBtBp1208Uploaded bySony Rama
- ac dc coil codes ei coil upgrade addersUploaded bymubs73
- IJETR032521Uploaded byerpublication
- Chapter 1Uploaded bySiddharth Bhanushali
- XRRatio ABBUploaded byAshish Ranjan
- Databook CurrentUploaded byAsad Khan
- Case Study 4Uploaded byAndreas Pantziaros
- Corona Testing Under Direct Voltage ConditionsUploaded byPlaton Apergis
- DEEE-73(1)Uploaded bybibiana8593
- Lab Phy360 1Uploaded byIsmi Fadli
- Lecture SlidesUploaded bykanchi
- Measurement of High Voltage(Naseer Ahmed)Uploaded bymohandissohaib
- IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy July 2017Uploaded bysusantojd
- Clausius Inequality and EntropyUploaded byShoaib Mughal
- Mains Rotational Motion Paper-01Uploaded byAnju Mohta
- whirlpool_awz_330_1Uploaded byrobmeier
- Giancoli Ch 32 Particle.pdfUploaded byahkeel
- CROW BAR PROTECTION Exciter Discharge ProtectionUploaded bycyyguy3k
- Harmonic Wave TrainUploaded byeka123
- 9.LORUploaded byThameemul Buhari
- 3.3 (b) Mole N mass.pptUploaded byFidree Aziz