Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caselets
When Suresh, Manohar Naidu’s grandson, took over the business, he knew things
needed to change. Output hadn’t fallen, and the company was surviving financially
despite competition from what he called “plastic ducks” from the Far East. But
Suresh noticed that productivity per worker had stayed the same for ten years, even
during the period since the company had bought the latest equipment. While
touring the plant, he noticed many employees yawning, and he found himself
doing the same. No one quit. No one complained. They all gave him a smile when
he walked by. But no one seemed excited with the work.
Suresh had heard about a technique called “job rotation” and decided to try it out.
He gave all workers a taste of the “fun” jobs. He asked for volunteers to exchange
jobs for one morning a week. The fine-tuners were skeptical, and the other workers
were only slightly more enthusiastic. The whole program turned out to be a
disaster. Even with guidance, the planers and spray-painters could not master the
higher-precision techniques, and the fine-tuners seemed willing to give them only
limited assistance. After one trial week, Suresh gave up.
During a lunch break that Friday; Suresh was wandering around outside the plant
bemoaning his failure. Then he noticed one of the rough-cutters, Rangarao,
whittling at something with an ordinary pocket knife. It turned out to be a block of
wood that he had cut incorrectly and normally would have thrown in the scrap
heap. But as price said, “It kind of looked like a duck, in a odd way,” and he had
started whittling on it in spare moments.
Suresh like what he saw and asked Price if he would be willing to sell him the duck
when he got through with it. Price looked surprised, but he agreed. The following
week, Suresh noticed that price had furnished the whittlign and was shading it in a
way that made it look even odder. When it was finished, Suresh offered it to one of
his regular customers, who took a look at it and said, “You’ve got hand made?”
and asked if he could order a gross.
By the middle of the next month, Suresh’s “Odd Ducks” program was in full
swing. Workers were still responsible for producing the usual number of
conventional ducks, but they were allowed to use company tools and materials any
time they wanted to work on their own projects. There were no quotas or
expectations for the Odd Ducks. Some employees worked on one for weeks; others
collaborated and produced one or more a day. Some wouldn’t sell their ducks but
crafted them to practice their skills and brought them home to display on their
mantels. Those who would sell them kept half the selling price. That price usually
did not amount to more than their regular hourly wage, but no one seemed to care
about the precise amount of income.
The response to the Odd Duct program was so great that Suresh put up a bulletin
board he called “Odd Letter” as a place to post appreciative notes from customers.
Mot of these customers, it seemed, had no interest in hunting but just liked to have
the ducks around. And when Suresh leaned that some of his customers were in turn
selling the ducks as “Manohar naidu’s old Time odd Ducks,” he did not complain.
1. How did the “Odd Ducks” program enrich the jobs at Standard Decoy?
2. What motivated workers to participate in making the Odd Ducks?
Caselet – 3- Abaya Life
Today, many companies are experimenting with
Reengineering, the wide-spread redesign of jobs and critical processes in an
organization to increase efficiency, cut costs, increase customer satisfaction, and
gain a competitive advantage. Often, reengineering focuses on improving critical
organizational processes such as the way insurance claims are handled or how
customer orders and complaints are processed. Reengineering and the jobs
redesign that the accompanies if frequently result in higher levels of core job
dimensions such as autonomy and task identity.
Abaya Life & Casualty has made major changes in the ways it processes insurance
claims and in the design of jobs within its claim-processing units. Under its new
system, a customer whose car has been stolen calls an 2424 number. In a single
phone call, the customer is told where to pick up a rental car and who will be
handling the claim at Abaya, and the customer is given an appointment with a
claims adjuster. Under abaya’s old system, this procedure would have taken from
two to five days.
Levels of autonomy and task identity are likely to be higher under the new system
because workers have more discretion to make decisions and can handle most
claims from start to finish. According to the job characteristic model, these
increases in autonomy and task identity should have positive effects on the
intrinsic motivation of claims processors. The CEO of Abaya, Rohan Chopra,
expects such changes tohelp the company dramatically cut its costs and gain a
competitive advantage. In any case, customers appear to be delighted with the new
system. Abaya has been receiving fan mail from satisfied customers!
For a standard product, total through put time, from order receipt to shiptime,
totaled 10 to 15 weeks, provided that all went according to plan. Of that time, sales
took 3 to 5 weeks for order entry and processing, while operations took 7 to 10
weeks for manufacturing. In operations, there were six organizational levels from
the shop-floor employee to the head of the department. A typical purchase order
might require seven or eight signatures. Departmental loyalties were strong, and
interdepartmental coordination required numerous formal meetings. Sail one busy
manager, “we have morning meetings, afternoon meetings, quality review
meetings, engineering review meetings, purchasing meetings, make-buy meetings,
and meetings to schedule meetings”.
The production process for an average bearing began in the plant engineering
department, which developed the manufacturing drawings – except when supplied
by the customer. All parts passed through a handful of very expensive machines in
the two departments.
Shipments were frequently held up for want of outside parts or because or internal
production bottlenecks. In some cases delays extended for several weeks,
infuriating customers. To cope, Chabria built up inventories of parts and work-in-
process at all stages. By 2000 inventories had risen to four months of sales. A
computerized material requirements planning (MRP) system introduced in the mid-
1990s at a cost of nearly Rs.10 lakh generated detailed reports on schedules,
inventories, and manufacturing costs (by order, by department, etc.). In addition,
production planning and control (PPC) held periodic meetings to review the status
of various jobs. When all else failed, the “sales action” group in the PPC
department shepherded high-priority orders through the production maze to placate
angry customers. Despite this, in 2000 only a fourth of all industrial orders and a
tenth of all aerospace orders were delivered on time.
Auburn Machine Co. produces parts that are shipped nationwide. It has an
opportunity to produce plastic packaging cases, which are currently purchased at
Rs.70 each. Annual demand depends largely on economic conditions, but long-run
estimates are as shown in table.
If the company produces the cases itself, it must renovate an existing work are and
purchase a molding machine, which will result in annual fixed costs of Rs.8,000.
variable costs for labor, materials, and overhead are estimated at Rs.50 per case.
-
The decision to locate a biotechnology research and developmental facility is based
on a number of factors ranging from the preferences of founding senior
management and proximity to educational/research institutions to the ability to
attract and retain employees.
Location Factor (n =
Mean (%)
50)
Founder/CRO wanted
1.33 93
to live in area
Proximity to
1.72 84
educational institution
Availability of
2.10 70
scientists
Ability of attract
2.12 74
employees
Availability of
2.12 70
technicians
Attractive physical
2.16 70
environment
Ample space for facility
2.49 61
expansion
Availability of existing
2.58 61
facility
Access to major airport 2.58 54
Productivity of
2.58 54
qualified labour
1. Following the results of the survey which factors do you think will most
influence the location of the new firm? Why?
2. Explain the importance of “Proximity to educational institute in location
decision of this biotechnology firm?
Caselet – 9- Fun School
Fun School (FS), a toy manufacturer, has a policy to introduce one or two new toys
a year. In August 1999, the manufacturing manager, Mathew, has been informed
by his toy inventors that they have designed a talking Barbie doll. This doll will
stand two feet high and is capable of telling jokes via an electronic voice
synthesizer. One of the company’s three manufacturing staff departments, design
engineering, states that the product can be made primarily from molded plastic
using the firm’s new all-purpose molders (now used for making small attachments
to the firm’s wooden toys). FS in its previous initial production of new toys, has
relied heavily on its skilled workforce to “debug” the product design as they make
the product and to perform quality inspections on the finished product. Production
runs have been short runs to fill customer orders.
If the talking Barbie doll is to go into production, however, the production run size
will have to be large and assembly and testing procedures will have to be more
refined. Currently, each toy maker performs almost all of the processing steps at
his or her workbench. The production engineering department believes that the
assembly of the new toy is well within the skill levels of the current workforce but
that the voice synthesizer and battery-operated movement mechanism will have to
be subcontracted. FS has always had good relations with subcontractors, primarily
because the firm has placed its orders with sufficient lead time so that its vendors
could optimally sequence. FS orders with those of some larger toy producers.
Mathew has always favored long-range production planning so that he can keep his
30 toymakers busy all year.
The marketing department has forecast a demand of 50,000 talking Barbie dolls for
the coming month. The dolls should sell at retail for Rs.980. a preliminary cost
analysis from the process engineering department is that they will cost no more
than Rs.410 each to manufacture. The company is currently operating at 60
percent capacity. Financing is available and there is no problem with cash flow.
Mathew is wondering if he should go into production of talking Barbie dolls.
How consistent is the talking Barbie doll order with the current capabilities and
focus of FS?