Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND JACQUES
LEROY
EcoleNationaleSupdrieure
de Gdoiogie
Appliqude,
B.P.No. 452,54001NancyCedex,France
Abstract
0561-0128/85/219/1605-1452.50 1605
1606 GUHA, ARCHAMBAULT,AND LEROY
I0
1,•
......
I',,, ' ''
• ':'-:
.•.•T.•?;
..:'.:
• "rT•.
-'.":
: :5 .:.- ...:..
,•" '.'•:'..': i
:'T'T'.'
' :
'.' - :'5. : .: ' ' .' ".: '
ß
0 t
N
ILl
-1- ILl
I-- Z
n- 0
0 N
z
o :'::
o
I
I
I
I
I :. :: : :
:.:':.::5..
I
I
i
i
o
o
o
1607
1608 GUHA,ARCHAMBAULT,AND LEROY
A•B
8700............... .• ::
-'_.• META
ANO.T.OS,•E
/ORE ZONES
8200
["•--• FAULT
100 meters
fluidswereintroducedsyntectonically
duringthede- andanalysis of shear-zone
geometry(Ramsay,1980)
velopmentof the shearzone. showthat, assumingsimpleshear,the schistosity
first
appearsat the marginof the shearzone,makingan
GeomechanicalInterpretation of the Deposit angleof about45ø to the wallsof the zone.The schis-
tosityrotateswith furtherdisplacementinsidethe shear
A geomechanical model is proposedfor the main
zone,becoming
strongertowardthe centerof the zone
shear(zoneB) and the subsidiary structure(zoneD)
to explainthe developmentof zone D in relationto
and makingan angleof lessthan 45ø but neverbe-
comingparallelto the displacement
direction.Asstated
zone B and the progressiveevolutionof thesetwo
structures.Alsointegratedinto this modelis a shear by RamsayandGraham(1970)the schistosity surface
is parallelto the XY planeof the finite strainellipsoid
fracture dilatancy model which explainsthe struc-
tures resultingfrom dilation phenomenainside ore
with axesX > Y > Z, and the schistosity planesap-
zones B and D. pearingat the marginof the shearzoneare oriented
at an angle of 45ø to the walls of the zone, which
Developmentof the main shearzone means that for the Henderson shear zone these schis-
and its subsidiarystructures tosity planesshouldhave a north-southstrike and a
near-verticaldip, which is in accordancewith obser-
The regionalsignificanceof the main shearzone, vations(XiYi planesin Fig. 4). The abovestudiesalso
in whichthe Henderson
orebodies
lie (Fig. 1), is un- established a direct correlation between the decrease
known:it couldbe a splayfrom the Dore Lake fault of thisangleandthe increasing intensityof the schis-
(Fig. 1), followingthe modelsof developmentpro- tositytowardthe centerof the zone,notingthat the
posedby Price (1966)and Lajtai (1969)on the me- schistosity
curvesas it is tracedfrom the marginto
chanicsof conjugateand secondorder faults,or the the center and that the axis of curvature is in a direction
resultof multiple displacements of the Dore Lake parallelto the intersectionof the schistosityand the
shearzoneby late-stage faulting,or it couldbe related wall corresponding to the Yi = Yf axisin Figure 4.
to the emplacementof the Chibougamaupluton. The dihedralanglebetweenthe schistosity surface
The oblique attitude of schistosityrelative to the or X•,Y•,surfaceand the wallsof the shearzone is
directionof displacement isoneof the mostsignificant equivalentto the angle 0' (Ramsayand Graham,
featuresobservedin the Hendersonshearzone(Figs. 1970),whichis a functionof shearstrainand canbe
2 and $) and providesa meansfor the determination usedto measureshearstrainparallelto the shearzone
of displacement direction.Experimentalstudies(Mor- and the shapeof the strainellipsoidat that point.The
gensternand Tchalenko,1967a and b; Tchalenko, technique developed by Ramsay andGraham(1970)
1968),fieldobservations (Ramsay andGraham,1970), can be extendedto integratesuccessive finite shear
E VOL U TION OF MINERALIZING FLUIDS 1609
Incremental
shearstrainplane N P shearsinsidemainshearzone
q,"• Con,u,•ate
Ni, shear zone
'x• // /sch'støs't•'Z•Shear
/Actual zone
/.
Q,,, ex,st,ng / /•65 • (BZONE)
t Incre•tal shear
/ stra• plane Xi Y•
• ' • ,P she•s inside
mainshe• z•e
• I •Actu• schistosity
inside
• I I I•a• she• z•e
•e of theconju•te• I I •ain she• z•e
/ • I I I:• Fo,•t• i. th•
x', II I,,
/ • .=1• Po (oe3) • I • IXD zone structure
/ •'• •3_ . ß ß ee ß ß . e•_l _•1 .•or R sheas
/ '
Zi ' • o Zi
observations
strainsacrossa shear-zoneprofile and to calculatethe (Figs.2, $, and 4) which demonstrate an
anglebetweenboththe strikeanddip of the schistosity
total differential displacementacrossthe zone. Ob-
and thoseof the shearzone,it may be concludedthat
servationson the schistosityplanes inside the Hen-
dersonmain shearzonereveala dihedralangle(0') the displacementon the main shearzonehasto be an
which variesbetween 15ø and 5ø with an approxi- obliqueone.The relativeattitudesof the incremental
mate mean value0 -• 8.5ø. Usingthe previoustech- strainaxesXi, Yi, and Zi as well asthe final strainaxes
nique the shearstrain will be around 7'y and the in- X/, Y/, and Zf leaveno doubtaboutit. Accordingto
tegrationacross the zone(whichisapproximately100 Ramsay(1980),duringthe firststages of deformation
m) will give a displacement of 700 m or more. the principalaxesof stressa•, as,and aswill coincide
It can be deducedthat, if the directionof displace- with the incrementalstrainXi, Yi, and Zi, respectively,
mentisalongthe strikeof the shearzone,the schistosity but as deformationproceedsthe deformingmassbe-
will makean anglewith the strikeof the shearzone comesanisotropic and thiscorrespondence no longer
but will havethe sameapparentdip asthe shearzone existsin the followingstagesof deformation.This was
in a sectionperpendicularto it; also,a reverseattitude corroborated by the experimentalstudiesof Tchalenko
of displacement (1968).In the caseof the Henderson
will beobtainedif thereisa component shearzone,the
alongthe dip of the shearzone. Thus, on the basisof principalaxesof externalstressrrel,rre2,and rreO
have
1610 GUHA, ARCHAMBAULT, AND LEROY
A)
B) //'//D
D ,"'R
The mode of formation of this second-order fault 5B and C. Shearlensesare formed by the interaction
(zoneD structure)couldbe explainedby the model of thesediscontinuities, and they will be seento fa-
of Lajtai(1969),whereit hasbeenshownthatthetype cilitate the formationof the schistosity, as illustrated
of enechelonfractures(zoneD type)thatwill develop in Figure5C. A directimplicationof thisinterpretation
dependson the normalstressactingnormallyto the with respectto the displacementof zone D is evident
primary fault plane or main shearzone.The experi- from the illustrationsin Figure 5B and C. The dis-
mentalworkdoneby Mandlet al. (1977)provedthat placementon the main shearis muchlarger and later
shearbandsproducedby simple shearingcannot be than the zone D displacement.Both structureswere
interpretedasCoulombslipsbut areboundedby planes active at the time of the formation of the main shear
of maximum shear stress.In their study they have zone but zone D became inactive later, or after the
shownthe behaviorof the principalstressesinsideand secondstageof discontinuity formation.Anotherchar-
outsideshearzonesat peakand after peakshearstress, acteristicwhich may be deducedfrom thesestructural
where they noticedquite a variation in the oh axis. featuresis the great variationof the thicknessof the
They provedthat, at peak shearstress,the axisof the shear zone, a phenomenonobservedby Tchalenko
maximumprincipal stressmust make an angle of 45ø
with the shear zone, as deduced for the Henderson
(1968)andillustrated in Figure5B andC. Thisexplains
the rangeof horizontalwidths(16-100 m) of the main
shearzone (oM in Fig. 4). Also, they observedthe shear zone.
developmentof second-orderfaults associatedwith
On the basisof the previousdiscussion
and obser-
Coulomb'sslip conceptand the instantaneous stateof
stress.Thosestructuresor faults are conjugateRiedel
vationsit is possible
to summarizea geomechanical
modelfor the developmentof the main shearand its
shearsappearingat ___(•r/4
- ½/2) with the ohaxis(½ subsidiarystructures:
beingthe angleof internalfriction)whichshowedthe
samesenseof relative displacementasthe main shear
zone(syntheticRiedelshearsR). ThoseRiedelshears 1. A stressfield with the greatestprincipal stress
correspond to thezoneD structures,whichareat +(•r/ orientedin an east-westdirectionapplied to the Dore
4 - ½/2) with the oMaxis(Fig. 4). Anothertype of Lake Complexby orogenicprocesses would produce
second-order faults(P-typeshears)will developat +(•r/ brittle failure near the surfaceby developingfaults
4 + ½/2) with the ohaxis;they are of the thrusttype andenechelonfracturepatterns(Roering,1968;Lajtai,
and their displacementis in the oppositesenseof the 1969;Ramsay,1980), wouldfail in a brittle-ductile
R type. Suchstructureshavebeen observedinsidethe mannerat intermediate depth(thepart understudy),
shearzone(Fig. 4). ThusLajtai's'modelexplainsthe and wouldfail by ductileflow at greaterdepth.The
rotation in strike and dip of the zone D structureon Hendersonmain shearzone is containedwithin planes
the basis of the variation of the normal stress on the of maximumshearstress
(Mandlet al., 1977)with the
main shearzone, which shouldproducetensionfrac- maximumprincipalexternalstressaxis(oM)oriented
tures at low normal stress and shear fracture at inter- at 45 ø to the main shear zone axis. The deformation
mediate values of normal stress. in the shearzonewill transformthe rockprogressively
On a qualitative basis,the studiesdone by Mor- by sheardisplacement into cataclastic
zonesin brittle
gensternand Tchalenko(1967a and b), Tchalenko failure (Mandl et al., 1977;Lajtai, 1969) or mylonite
(1968),and Mandl et al. (1977) on clay and granular zonesin moreductileshearzones(White et al., 1980).
materialssubmittedto a shearloadingdevice dem- 2. At the initial stageof developmentof the Hen-
onstratethe sequenceof eventsfor the formationof dersonshearzone, subsidiaryfracture patternsare
second-order faults. These studies show that the ori- developedas second-order faultsand enechelonten-
entation and sequenceof the microscopicdisconti- siongashes(Lajtai, 1969;Roering,1968).As shown
nuitiesare independentof the fabric of the initial ma- in Figure 5B the discontinuities will appearin the
terialsand are directly related to the principal stress followingorder accordingto Tchalenko(1968): (1)
directions.The discontinuities appearin the following at peakstrength,Riedelshears(R and R) are formed
order:(1) at peak strength,RiedelshearsR and R' or which correspondto Coulomb-type slip planes at
second-order faultsthat will developen echelonacross +(•r/4 - ½/2) with the a• axisor at +½/2 and 90ø
the shearzonesand will propagatein the vicinityof - 4/2 to the direction of movementwith the acute
the walls(formationof zoneD structures), as shown angle pointing againstthe relative movement(½ is
in Figure5B; (2) afterpeakstrength,restraintshears the angleof internalfriction);thiscorresponds to the
P in the thrust attitude inside the shear zone, which formationof typeD structures;
(2) afterpeakstrength,
may be observed in Figure5B and C; and ($) toward restraintshears(P) in the thrustattitudeinsidethe
residual strength, principal displacementshearsD shear zone are developedat -4•/2 oriented approx-
characterizedthe shearzone,as illustratedin Figure imately oppositeto the R shears,which can be seen
1612 GUHA, ARCHAMBAULT,AND LEROY
in Figures2 and 5B and C; and (g) towardresidual in dip and strike on fault planes and shear zones.
strength,principaldisplacement shears(D) are de- Thesemay be considered asdifferentordersof mag-
velopedin the directionof the movement,features nitudeof irregularities dependingon the dimensions
whichare notedin Figures2 and g. of the planesof failure. The overridingof theseas-
g. With the continuation
of the sheardisplacement, peritiesby shearingdisplacement will resultin the
progressivefragmentationand pulverizationof the creation of voids,i.e., a succession of open spaces
rockswill take place inside the shear zone, with a which may be filled by fluidsand/or crushedrock.
transformationof the mineralogyand texture of the Theseare characteristicfeaturesof the dilataneyin
rockintoa mylonitieshearzonewith the development shears.
of an oblique sehistosity.
This will be aided by the Any type of plane insidethe main shearzone and
formationof shear lensesby the interactionof the zoneD structurein the Henderson deposit(foliation
earlier discontinuities which will facilitate the for- planes,faults,joints,contactplanes,etc.)couldshow
mation of the ultimate compression
texture,i.e., the a dilation componentand the formation of open
sehistosity(Ramsayand Graham,1970; Tehalenko, spaces (dilatancyphenomena) in thepresenceof shear
1968;Mandlet al., 1977).This is illustratedin Figure displacements on the mean shearplane if the normal
5C. The evolution of the states of stress and finite strain pressure(e) on the plane is lessthan the transition
at and after failure inside and outside the shear zone normalpressurewhich delimited the brittle and duc-
isdocumented by Ramsay(1980),Ramsay andGraham tile behavior of the rock.
(1970),Morgenstern and Tehalenko(1967aand b), A physicalapproachhasbeenproposedto solvethe
Tehalenko(1968), Lajtai (1969), and Mandl et al. problemin combiningthe friction,dilatancy,and in-
(1977).The lastworkersnotedthat the thickness of terlockcontributions
to the peakshearstrengthof reg-
the shearzone increaseswith the shearingdisplace- ularindentedplanes.Sucha basiswasusedby Ladanyi
ment, a phenomenonwhich is causedby the accu- andArchambault
(1970,1972,1980)toderivea math-
mulationof grainfragmentsin the interstices,
which ematicalmodeland provedaccuratein experimental
increases
the localresistance
to shearing(shearhard- modelsstudied.The shearequationshownbelowwas
ening). developed by satisfying thefirstlawof thermodynamics
4. Whereas the main shear zone and the P and D and by assuming a totaltransformation of energyinto
shearsof stage(2) insideshearzoneare in continual frictionalheat.The equationexpresses mathematically
movement,the subsidiary structures of zoneD (the the ideathat,whentwo similarirregularsurfaces, ini-
R-type shears)retain a simplefracturepatternand tially kept tightly togetherin completecontactby a
movelittle comparedto the principalshearzoneafter normalpressure tr (Fig. 6A), are forcedto performa
its formation,asillustratedin Figure 5B and C. sheardisplacement in the directionof the appliedshear
The above model leads us to examine the mechan- stress•', the strength mobilizedby the displacement
ics of dilation inside the main shear zone and in zone originates essentially from the followingthreesources:
(1) the resistance to slidingalongthe contactsurface
D structures, whichwill demonstrate a relativelysim-
oftheirregularities,
(2)theresistance
toshearing
across
ilar behaviorfor dilatancy.Mandlet al. (1977)ob- the irregularities,
and (g) the workperformedby the
servedan overridingof asperitieson grainsand other
normalpressuretr duringthe dilationor contraction
irregularitiesin their experimentalstudieson shear of the system.
zonesin granular material, similar to that observed
In a generalcaseof shearalongan indentedplane
by variousauthors.This phenomenonis responsible or througha fracturedrockmass,it may be expected
for the developmentof pinch and swell structures that the three mentionedsourceswill participatein
duringthe formationof shearzonesand fault planes the overall strengthsimultaneously but in differing
suchaszoneD. This process playsan importantrole amounts.The proposed shearequation,the complete
in fluid circulationand will be influencedby the developmentof which can be found in Ladanyi and
fiuid'sinterstitialpressures
duringthe formationand Archambault(1970),hasthe form,
evolution of shear zones.
o o-
ferentanglesi0with respectto the generalshearplane
(Fig. 6A) have enabledthe followingtwo empirical
relationsfor the two parametersto be established
(Ladanyiand Archambault,1970):
c) 1j
tan i
o
and
•,=(1•T)K
tan
i0 (s)
as: 1-
( 1 . (4)
o (r•cr
The valueof the transitionstress,aT, for any dense
FIG. 6. Schematicrepresentation of basicassumptions and typ- rock,coincides,
according to Mogi(1966),in theMohr
ical resultsof the shearfracturedilatancymodel (after Ladanyi diagram(Fig. 6B), with the abscissa
of the intersec-
and Archambault,1970). A. Definitionof the dilationrate •, and tion point betweenthe failure envelopeof the rock
the sheararea ratio a,. B. Expectedfailure envelopesfor indented and a straightline passingthroughthe origin and
rocksurfaces.C. Typical variationsof parameters•, and a, with the
normal pressureacting during shear. making an angle of about $9ø with the a axis.It is
found mostoften that the value of aT SOdetermined
is very closeto the uniaxialcompressionstrengthof
wallsurfaces;
and•, isthedilationrate(dilatancy)
at rock, Co.
peak shearstrength,definedas the ratio dy/dx and The confiningpressureis providedfor in the ple-
the sheardisplacementdx at failure as illustratedin viousmodelvia the normalstresson the shearplane,
Figure 6A. At o- = 0, •, -- tan i0, where io is the but the brittle-ductiletransitionzone(aT) limitsthe
geometricascending slopeof relevantintact irregu- applicabilityof the model. These parameterscould
larities,and as-- ZAAs/A is the sheararea ratio ex- be affectedby the presenceof interstitialfluid pres-
pressedas the proportionof the total shearsurface sure, which was certainly the case.The previousde-
passing throughsolidrockduringpartialshearingof velopmentwas for dry, unfilled shear surfaces,but
the asperities
(Fig. 6A). It wassuggestedthat rr, the the role of water or fluids on the behavior of the shear
shearstrengthof the materialadjacentto the discon- fracture dilatancymodel is of prime importancefor
tinuity surfaces,be representedby a parabolicrela- the interpretationof the depositunder study.
tionship: The mechanismof dilationformationon irregular
shearsurfacesis illustratedin Figure 7A and C rep-
• = Co[(V-•+ n- l)/n](l + no'/Co)'/2, (9.) resentingschematicallya part of the zoneD structure
which showsthe dilatancyphenomena(3) after a
whereCois the uniaxialcompressive strengthof the sheardisplacement (,Xx).It is shownthat fragments
rock material adjacentto the discontinuitywhich, of rockcomingfrom partialshearingof asperities will
owingto weatheringor looseningof the surface,may be depositedinsidethe inducedopenings.Recalling
be lower than the uniaxialcompressive
strengthof the structural model for the main shear zone and zone
1614 GUHA,ARCHAMBAULT,
AND LEROY
• •gzone
a reasonablenumber of Tm and Th determinationsare
available.The field of zoneB samplesextendstoward
the top andbottomof referenceline (1) representing
/ Th 'C Tm = Th. The field of zone D samplesis restricted
40 80 120 160 200
to the top part of the reference line.
FIo. 9. Evolution of the fluid within zones B and D as seen
The analysisof the dissolvedions in the aqueous
from a temperatureof disappearance of halite (Tin)and temper- phasein the fluid inclusions, includingthe soluble
atureof homogenization(Th)plot.Line I corresponds to a relation daughter mineralssuch as the chlorides(reproduced
Tm= Th; points situatedabove line 2 correspondto inclusions in Table 1), demonstrates the followinggeneralchar-
oversaturated
at the time of trapping. acteristics:Na and Ca are the dominant cation, and
Ca/Na and Ca/Mg atomic ratiosare higher in zone
D than in zone B.
dilatancymodelwill enhancecirculationbetweenthe ThedatafromTable
1areplotied
onaschematic
main zoneand subsidiaryfaults.Anotherevidentcon- diagram
of zones
B andD showing
therelativepo-
clusionis that fluidsmigrate from zonesof high in- sitionof the samples(Fig. 10). In spiteof the limited
terstitialpressureand high strain (contractionzone) quantityof data,someinterestingpointscanbe noted.
to zonesof low interstitialpressure(dilationzone). The K/Na ratiosare nearly similar in boththe zones;
Thishasbeenshownby DunnetandMcMoore(1969),
who studiedthe influenceof inhomogeneous strain
T^]•LE 1. Atomic Ratios of the Cation in the Fluid
on the remobilizationof oresbasedon main param-
After Guhaet al. (1979),analyzedby the method
etersof differentialstress;namely, temperature,con- described by Potyet al. (1974).
fining pressure,differentialeffectivestress,and time.
The conclusionthat the dilation contractionsystem Atomic ratios
will keepthe hydrodynamicsystemoperatingis valid Stope or
Zone drift (DR) Sample K/Na Ca/Na Ca/Mg
for boththe main shear(zoneB) aswell asthe sub-
sidiarystructure(zoneD). In the latter case,where 11-55 249 0.019 0.58 48.7
the displacementshave been relatively limited, it is 11-55 180 0.025 0.47 24.8
possiblefor the movementor evolutionof the fluid 11-58 187A 0.025 0.68 88.2
to be different from that of the main shear zone. 9-55DR 606 0.014 0.56 85.1
9-55DR 607 0.015 0.44 55.0
9-55DR 608 0.017 0.51 61.9
Characteristics
offluidphases
within 18 MDR 218A 0.024 0.65 74.6
B and D zones 18 MDR 222 0.028 0.87 $6.$